Top Banner
Notes on David Cunning, Everyday Examples , chapters 1-4
12
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Notes on David Cunning, Everyday Examples, chapters 1-4.

Notes on David Cunning, Everyday Examples, chapters 1-4

Page 2: Notes on David Cunning, Everyday Examples, chapters 1-4.

Chapter 1The Nature and Existence of the External World

• Commonsense or direct realism (Aristotle)• Skepticism about the reliability of perceptions of the external

world• Descartes's use of skepticism to defend indirect realism (doubt

[e.g., the Dream Argument] => cogito => existence of God => non-deceiving God => pretty

reliable perception of the external world [as long as we do our part])• Aristotle on the four causes or explanatory factors (material,

formal, efficient, final)• Heidegger’s critique of technology and "enframing" (for example,

an automobile, computer, or cellphone)

Page 3: Notes on David Cunning, Everyday Examples, chapters 1-4.

Chapter 2Morality and Value

Possible Sources of Morality and Value:

• God• Objective structure of the world • Subjective feeling or sentiment• Evolution by natural selection (not covered by Cunning)

Page 4: Notes on David Cunning, Everyday Examples, chapters 1-4.

God and Morality

Euthyphro’s Dilemma – How do we understand the relationship between God and morality? There are two options:

1. Something is good (bad) because God commands (forbids) it.

2. God commands (or forbids) something because it is independently good (or bad).

An objection to #1 => morality is arbitraryAn objection to #2 => morality is self-standing and independent of God

Page 5: Notes on David Cunning, Everyday Examples, chapters 1-4.

Morality is Objective

• Definition: What is good or bad can be identified by anyone through rational inquiry into the moral order of the universe.

• Objections: How exactly do we identify this objective moral order? Why should we follow this order?

Page 6: Notes on David Cunning, Everyday Examples, chapters 1-4.

Morality is Subjective

• Definition: Everyone has an inner moral sense that enables him or her to identify bad from bad.

• Objections: What about differences among individuals or cultures? What if an individual or a culture lacks moral sentiment?

Page 7: Notes on David Cunning, Everyday Examples, chapters 1-4.

Evolution by Natural Election

The Dutch primatologist Frans de Waal has identified the following basic features involved in the emergence of “morality from the bottom up”:• Empathy and Consolation• Pro-social Tendencies• Reciprocity and Fairness

http://www.ted.com/talks/frans_de_waal_do_animals_have_morals?language=en

Page 8: Notes on David Cunning, Everyday Examples, chapters 1-4.

Chapter 3Material Minds: A No-Brainer?

• Materialism• Immaterialism• Eliminative materialism

Page 9: Notes on David Cunning, Everyday Examples, chapters 1-4.

Arguments for Materialism

• Only matter exists (Epicurus, Lucretius, Thomas Hobbes)• Minds travel with bodies (Margaret Cavendish)• Mind-Body interaction (Princess Elizabeth)• Aging and brain trauma (Julien Offray de la Mettrie)• Artificial intelligence (Alan Turing vs. John Searle)

Page 10: Notes on David Cunning, Everyday Examples, chapters 1-4.

Arguments for Immaterialism

• Dualism (Socrates, René Descartes)• Matter is too low-grade to explain consciousness (Plotinus,

Augustine)• Human beings are made in the image (tselem) of God

(Genesis 1:26-28)• How could physical parts interact to create the unity of

consciousness? (G.W. Leibniz)• Physicalism is false; there exists an irreducible subjective

viewpoint (Thomas Nagel, Frank Jackson)

Page 11: Notes on David Cunning, Everyday Examples, chapters 1-4.

An Argument for Eliminative Materialism

• Paul Churchland’s position is that external mental categories like beliefs and desires (“folk psychology”) are misleading and can (and should) be reduced to internal brain states and activities

• Objections: – Churchland’s view is self-refuting;– His preferred scientific terminology is just as imprecise as folk psychological

terms as “beliefs” or “desires”

Page 12: Notes on David Cunning, Everyday Examples, chapters 1-4.

Chapter 4The Meaning of Life

• Epicurus on hedonism (= maximizing net pleasure over pain)• Epictetus on rational self-control over one’s emotions and “going with the grain”• Susan Wolf on the four criteria for a having a meaningful life:

– The person must be excited about, and actively engaged in, some set of projects (vs. the Blob);– The person must have some goal(s) that he or she sees as having long-term value, and that their

everyday pursuits contribute to these (vs. the Useless);– The person - to some degree – must be successful at the pursuits to which he or she is

committed (vs. the Bankrupt);– The person’s life must actually be valuable or important (vs. the Failure).– Two case studies:

Walter Palmer (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LzXpE1mjqA&feature=youtu.be) Rachel Beckwith https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXpkBJ5r0Qg)

• Harry Frankfurt on first-order and second-order desires (for example, having a desire to eat nutritious food vs. having a desire to have the desire to eat nutritious food).

• Socrates on the best life as one that emphasizes spiritual and intellectual activity over embodiment

• The question of an eternal afterlife