Top Banner
Note ! The following is excerpted from a lecture found on-line. The original author is Professor Peter Y. Yu Department of Physics University of California at Berkley
16

Note! The following is excerpted from a lecture found on-line. The original author is Professor Peter Y. Yu Department of Physics University of California.

Jan 02, 2016

Download

Documents

Annabel Floyd
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Note! The following is excerpted from a lecture found on-line. The original author is Professor Peter Y. Yu Department of Physics University of California.

Note! The following is excerpted from a lecture found on-line.

The original author is Professor Peter Y. YuDepartment of Physics

University of California at Berkley

Page 2: Note! The following is excerpted from a lecture found on-line. The original author is Professor Peter Y. Yu Department of Physics University of California.

Impurities & Defects Effects on Semiconductor Devices

“Human beings and semiconductors are

interesting because of their defects”*

*Peter Y. Yu, U.C.-Berkeley

Outline: Point Defects1. Shallow & Deep Impurities (“Centers”)

2. Examples of Deep Centers a. Isoelectronic centers (a “good” defect!)

b. Fe in Si (a “bad” defect for solar cells).

3. Conclusions

Page 3: Note! The following is excerpted from a lecture found on-line. The original author is Professor Peter Y. Yu Department of Physics University of California.

1. Donors: Examples: PSi in Si, SiGa in GaAs

2. Acceptors:Examples: BSi in Si, SiAs in GaAs

3. Isovalent or Isoelectronic:Example: NP in GaP

4. Amphoteric:Example: Si in GaAs

SiGa is a donor, SiAs is an acceptor.

5. Vacancies & Interstitials

Defect Classification by their Electronic Properties

Page 4: Note! The following is excerpted from a lecture found on-line. The original author is Professor Peter Y. Yu Department of Physics University of California.

• Consider a single donor impurity, such as P substituting for Si.

– There is one extra valence electron e- in P in comparison to Si.

– This e- is very weakly bound to P+ by the

Screened Coulomb Potential: V = -[(e2)/(εr)]ε = Material dielectric constant. This accounts for the screening of the

impurity potential by the valence electrons.

• The Schrödinger Equation for that e- is “equivalent” to that for an

Effective “Hydrogen Atom”{(p2)/(2m*) - (e2)/(εr)]}ψ(r) = Eψ(r)

m* = The effective mass of the electron in the conduction band.• This approach is therefore known as the

Effective Mass Approximation• It is also known as the

Effective Hydrogen Atom Approximation

Hydrogenic or “Shallow” Defects

Page 5: Note! The following is excerpted from a lecture found on-line. The original author is Professor Peter Y. Yu Department of Physics University of California.

• Just as in the Hydrogen Atom, the energy eigenvalues E for the donor energy levels form a Rydberg series. Because of this, they are called

“Hydgrogenic” LevelsThey have the form:

En = E – (R*)/(n2) (n = 1,2,3,4,.)

where the Effective Rydberg constant is

R* = (m*/m)(13.6 eV)/(ε)2 E Energy when the e- becomes free (ionized in H). This is the conduction band edge in

semiconductors. R* Energy to ionize the electron in the ground state.

“Hydgrogenic” Impurity Levels

Page 6: Note! The following is excerpted from a lecture found on-line. The original author is Professor Peter Y. Yu Department of Physics University of California.

• “Hydgrogenic” Impurity Levels for a single donor electron have the form:

En = E – (R*)/(n2) (n = 1,2,3,4,.)

the effective Rydberg constant is

R* = (m*/m)(13.6 eV)/(ε)2 E Energy of the conduction band edge in semiconductors.

R* Energy to ionize the electron in the ground state.

• Using the above equation, the binding energy of the e- in the 1s level of the donor ion is ~ 10-100 meV in semiconductors. It is that small because, generally m* << m and ε >> 1.

• For this effective “Hydrogen Atom”, there is also an effective “Bohr radius”, a* = ε(0.5Å)(m/m*) a* is a measure of the average distance that the 1s donor electron can move in the lattice away from the donor atom. Typical numbers give:a* > 10Å. This is a large distance (several lattice spacings)!

“Hydgrogenic” Impurity Levels

Page 7: Note! The following is excerpted from a lecture found on-line. The original author is Professor Peter Y. Yu Department of Physics University of California.

8

“Hydrogenic” Donor Levels

• Note that, since the donor levels are a few meV & the

bandgap Eg is in the eV range, this diagram is obviously

NOT to scale!!

Schematic Diagram of hydrogenic donor levels

in the bandgap region of a direct gap material

Page 8: Note! The following is excerpted from a lecture found on-line. The original author is Professor Peter Y. Yu Department of Physics University of California.

9

Comparison:Measured Shallow Donor & Acceptor Levels & Effective Mass Approximation Predictions

in some compound semiconductors

Page 9: Note! The following is excerpted from a lecture found on-line. The original author is Professor Peter Y. Yu Department of Physics University of California.

10

Two “Local Factors”which help to determine defect properties are

1. The chemical nature of the defect2. The defect “size”.

• Impurities with d & f valence electrons tend to retain their atomic nature in the material. That is, the electron is localized & doesn’t travel very far from it’s donor atom.

• Impurities with a large size difference from the hostatoms tend to induce (sometimes very large!)

Lattice Relaxation.• Defects involving dangling bonds (e.g. vacancies) also

tend to induce (sometimes very large!)

Lattice Relaxation.

Page 10: Note! The following is excerpted from a lecture found on-line. The original author is Professor Peter Y. Yu Department of Physics University of California.

11

Deep Levels or “Deep Centers”• The binding energies E of hydrogenic donor or acceptor

impurities are typically < 100 meV & therefore E << Eg,where Eg is the host material bandgap.

So these impurities are also labeled as

Shallow Impurities or Shallow Levels. The earliest understanding was that defects which produce

energy levels where the Effective Mass (hydrogenic)

Approximation is not valid were known as

Deep Centers or Deep Levels.It was assumed that these defects always produced levels E in the host bandgap of the order of ~ (½)Eg from a band edge. The more

recent, modern understanding is that deep centers may have energy

levels in the bandgap which can be close to either the conduction

band edge or the valence band edge. It turns out that, for such defects,

lattice relaxation effects can be important.

Page 11: Note! The following is excerpted from a lecture found on-line. The original author is Professor Peter Y. Yu Department of Physics University of California.

12

Qualitative reasons for Lattice Relaxation

Host atoms may have to change their equilibrium positions (displace from

equilibrium) in order to accommodate defects. For example, this happens if the

size

of the impurity atom is either >> larger than the size of the host atom it displaces

or

if the impurity atom size is << the size of the host atom. The most severe case of

this happens if there is a vacancy. In that case, the host lattice tends to form new

bonds so that there are no “dangling bond “defects left. The figure shows a

schematic of what happens when there is a vacancy in Si.

Page 12: Note! The following is excerpted from a lecture found on-line. The original author is Professor Peter Y. Yu Department of Physics University of California.

13

Energy Considerations in Lattice Relaxation • It costs a small amount in energy to displace atoms (~phonon

energy for small displacements) but this more than balanced out by the gain in lowering the electronic energy.

• The details of all of this are complex & beyond the scope of this course. They involve so-called “Negative & Centers” and Jahn-Teller distortions.

• There also can be strong electron-phonon coupling as in molecules

• The configuration and the size of the atomic displacements from equilibrium are determined by a complex balance between electronic and lattice energies and therefore are difficult to predict.

• These displacements also depend strongly on the charge state of the defect.

Page 13: Note! The following is excerpted from a lecture found on-line. The original author is Professor Peter Y. Yu Department of Physics University of California.

14

Deep Centers with Small Binding Energies & Lattice Relaxation Isoelectronic Traps

• Consider substitutional NAs in GaAs and GaAsP (alloy):N has the same valence as As or P so there is

No Coulomb Potential & thus No shallow donor or acceptor hydrogenic levels! There also are no dangling bonds.

•Can there be bound states? (Can there be levels in the bandgap?)

•N is much more electronegative than P and As. The

•electronegativity of N = 3 and for P = 1.64, respectively. This

means that electrons are more attracted to N than to P or As.

•This impurity potential is short-ranged and weak

A small binding energy is expected (the level in the bandgap is expected to be near a band edge).

•A simple approximation to this potential would be a δ-functionAlthough potential is shallow, it is highly localized nature The EMA is not a good approximation.

Page 14: Note! The following is excerpted from a lecture found on-line. The original author is Professor Peter Y. Yu Department of Physics University of California.

14

N in GaP & GaAsAn Example of a “Good” Deep Center

• The short-ranged potential means that the wavefunction in r space will be highly localized around the N.

The electron wavefunction is spread out in k-space.

Although GaP is an indirect bandgap material, the opticaltransition is very strong in GaP:N

Red LED’s used to be made from GaP:N

It turns out that a large amount of N can be introducedinto GaP but only small amount of N can be introducedinto GaAs because of a larger difference in atomic sizes.

Page 15: Note! The following is excerpted from a lecture found on-line. The original author is Professor Peter Y. Yu Department of Physics University of California.

13

N in GaPA “Good” Deep Center

• The N impurity in GaP is a “good” deep center because it makes GaP:N into a material which is useful for light-emitting diodes (LED).

• GaP has an indirect band gap so, pure GaP is not a goodmaterial for LED’s (just as Si & Ge also aren’t for the same reason).

• It turns out that the presence of N actually enhances theoptical transition from the conduction band to the N level which makes GaP:N an efficient emitter.

• So, GaP:N was one of the earliest materials for red LED’s.

• More recently, GaP:N has been replaced by themore efficient emitter: GaInP (alloy).

Page 16: Note! The following is excerpted from a lecture found on-line. The original author is Professor Peter Y. Yu Department of Physics University of California.

13

The GaAsP Alloy withN ImpuritiesInteresting,

beautiful data!

The N impurity level is a deep level in the bandgapin GaP but it is a level resonant in the conduction band in GaAs. The figure is photoluminescence datain the alloy GaAsxP1-x:N under large hydrostatic pressure for various alloy compositions x.