Not Yet Ready for Everyone: an Experience Report about a Personal Learning Environment for Language Learning Carsten Ullrich, Ruimin Shen, and Denis Gillet
Dec 13, 2014
Not Yet Ready for Everyone: an Experience Report about a
Personal Learning Environment for Language Learning
Carsten Ullrich, Ruimin Shen, and Denis Gillet
PLE for Language Learning - Carsten Ullrich
Personal Learning Environment
All kinds of things can serve as a PLE
Here: mash-up environment
Assembled according to suggestions by French teacher
Responsive OpenLearning Environments
www.role-project.eu
PLE for Language Learning - Carsten Ullrich
PLE for Language Learning - Carsten Ullrich
Motivation
Understand better the way how PLEs can be integrated in classroom
Do students interact with a PLE?
How do students interact with a PLE?
How do our students interact with a PLE?
What kind of interactions are suited?
Limitations, improvements
PLE for Language Learning - Carsten Ullrich
PLE’s and Evaluations
Significant amount of literature on benefits, potential
But difficult to find evaluations (what did I miss?)• Blees, I., Rittberger, M.: Web 2.0 learning environment: Concept,
implementation, evaluation. eLearning Papers 15 (2009): 13 participants familiar with Web 2.0 technology
• Minocha, S.: A study on the effective use of social software by further and higher education in the UK to support student learning and engagement. Tech.rep., JISC, Bristol (2009): 26 case studies where students worked with a singe Web 2.0 service embedded in a PLE
• Gillet, D., Law, E.L.C., Chatterjee, A.: Personal learning environments in a global higher engineering education web 2.0 realm. In: 1st IEEE Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). Madrid, Spain (2010): Higher engineering education, self-directed aggregation of peers, teaching assistants and resources
Small numbers, higher education, digitally literate users
But what about “typical” learners?
PLE for Language Learning - Carsten Ullrich
Online SJTU
Shanghai Jiao Tong University College of Continuing Education
35.000 students
Blended learning
PLE for Language Learning - Carsten Ullrich
Challenges
Students have only limited time available for study
• adult learners with full time job & family
“Typical” learners: limited digital literacy
Exam-oriented
Varying degree of interest in learning in general and in topic
PLE for Language Learning - Carsten Ullrich
Recording tool Conversation toolOnline translation
Spell CheckText2Speech
Business DictionaryConjugaisonQTI Engine
PLE for Language Learning - Carsten Ullrich
Why?
Tools can• facilitate communication
• empower students
Goals:• Facilitate access to tools, train tool usage skills
• Provide training opportunities
• Reuse: access to tools we never would be able to build on our own
PLE for Language Learning - Carsten Ullrich
Setting
French I and French II over 3 semesters • Spring 09 (S1, June 2009–August 2009),
• Summer 09 (S2, September–November 2009)
• Spring 10 (S3, starting March–June 2010)
Numbers:• S1: 128 students (French I),
• S2: 474 students (347 French I, 130 French II)
• S3: 369 students (178 French I, 191 French II)
• Students progress from French I to French II:S2 French II students = S1 French I students
PLE for Language Learning - Carsten Ullrich
Data on Participation
In classroom: • French I: 20–30 students• French II: 10–15 students
Final exams: • 33 for S1 (French I)• 106 (French I: 72, French II: 34) for S2• 95 (French I: 37, French II: 56) for S3
About 23%, typical for second language
Lecturer popular among students, received good grades in student evaluations
PLE for Language Learning - Carsten Ullrich
Evaluation Methods and Instruments
Observation of teacher-student interactions
Teacher interview
Questionnaires and video-taped Q&A session to collect student feedback students
Log-file analysis: usage of the PLE (comparable to homework)
PLE for Language Learning - Carsten Ullrich
Results
Students like the idea of having tools and exercises in one system
But: several technical and pedagogical issues
PLE for Language Learning - Carsten Ullrich
Connection
Mash-ups require fast connection
Access to services not always given
PLE for Language Learning - Carsten Ullrich
User Interface/Usability
Drawback of widgets: screen space allocated to widget significantly smaller than of a standard Web site
Scrolling within a page
Repeated log-ins
PLE for Language Learning - Carsten Ullrich
Data Collection
How to get data from embedded widgets?
OpenApp/CAM
But: how to access third-party widgets?• Javascript security
• Browser plug-ins not practically applicable
PLE for Language Learning - Carsten Ullrich
Restricted Functionality
Not all Web sites/services support widgets
A lot of existing sites/services offer access to their functionality only via Website
Widgets offer only limited access to main functionality
PLE for Language Learning - Carsten Ullrich
Pedagogical Issues
Initial approach of PLE usage: • introducing PLE during class via example usage• students received a homework that required them to
use the PLE as demonstrated
For instance, teacher showed how to record a video using a Web 2.0 service, and students’ homework consisted of recording a video, too, or to respond to the teacher’s video
No specific topic (increases motivation)?
Initial approach failed. No student did this or any other similar open homework
PLE for Language Learning - Carsten Ullrich
Reasons: Overtaxed
Students quickly become overtaxed
Concept of a PLE is unfamiliar
Embedded services are new
PLE for Language Learning - Carsten Ullrich
Value?
Students do not see the value in learning how to use tools
• it distracts from learning grammar and vocabulary
• does not prepare for the exam
PLE for Language Learning - Carsten Ullrich
Web 2.0 No Fun
Often, students (and teachers) not intrinsically motivated to use Web services
Technically inclined users might find playing around and experimenting with Web tool interesting in itself
But majority of students feel that time could be spent more effectively
PLE for Language Learning - Carsten Ullrich
Lessons Learned
Make sure students clearly perceive value
Not sufficient to present single example of how to use the PLE in class
Each PLE usage needs to be broken down into individual steps
Embed PLE usage in meaningful tasks
Open tasks can be too open:• “write a text in French and record yourself reading it” • “write and speak a self-introduction you will use for introducing
yourself to a French colleague”
Create class accounts in third-party services to avoid repeated account creation/login
PLE for Language Learning - Carsten Ullrich
Recent Results
This semester: PLE usage with specific, relevant tasks
Data still under analysis
Higher participation, good quality of student contributions
Encouraging feedback, students want to use PLE after class ends
PLE for Language Learning - Carsten Ullrich
Summary
Anderson, T.: PLEs versus LMS: Are PLEs ready for Prime time? (2006):
• “we are some distance from being able to operationalize” the vision of a PLE”
Today, PLE usage still only for teachers / students who feel comfortable with and are proficient in technology
PLE not motivating by itself
When used properly: encouraging feedback
PLE for Language Learning - Carsten Ullrich
Thank You
Questions?
Contact: • [email protected]
• http://www.carstenullrich.net
• http://twitter.com/ullrich