Top Banner
North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting
21

North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting.

Mar 27, 2015

Download

Documents

Anthony Greer
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting.

North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results

Michelle Woolfolk

NC Division of Water Quality

Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting

Page 2: North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting.

NC Eastern Regional Mercury Study

• Funded by USEPA grant (104(b)(3))• Goals

1. Evaluate levels of ambient mercury in surface water systems using low level techniques (Method 1631)

2. Estimate site-specific total mercury:methyl mercury translators to evaluate water quality criteria

3. Estimate site-specific water to fish bioaccumulation factors

4. Evaluate potential mercury loads from WWTPs

• Referred to hereafter as the ERMS

Page 3: North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting.

River basinsBROADCAPE FEARCATAWBACHOWANFRENCH BROADHIWASSEELITTLE TENNESSEELUMBERNEUSENEWPASQUOTANKROANOKESAVANNAHTAR-PAMLICOWATAUGAWHITE OAKYADKIN

Major hydrography

80 0 80 Miles

N

EW

S

NC Eastern Regional Mercury Study Sites

##

#

##

#

#

#

###

#

#

Eno River

Contentnea Creek

Cashie River Kendricks Creek

Phelps Lake

Black RiverSouth River

Lumber River

Lake Waccamaw

Waccamaw River

Ledbetter Lake

Abbotts Creek

Waccamaw River

Cape Fear R

iver

Neuse River

Tar River

Pee Dee R

iver

Deep

Rive

r

Haw R

iver

Chowan River

DWQ, 1/17/2003

Page 4: North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting.

Ambient Surface Water Total Hg

Figure 4-1a. ERMS: Total Mercury Histogram

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Total Hg conc., ng/L

Fre

qu

ency

Goal 1: Ambient mercury levels

No. of observations

46

Geometric mean (ng/L)

4.49

Median (ng/L) 4.1

Range of concentrations

1.06 – 28.6 Standard exceeded in 11 % of samples.

Page 5: North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting.

Ambient Surface Water Total MeHg

ERMS: Total Methylmercury Histogram - XX

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Total Hg conc., ng/L

Fre

qu

encyNo. of

observations48

Geometric mean (ng/L)

0.32

Median (ng/L) 0.241

Range of concentrations

0.065 – 4.04

Goal 1: Ambient mercury levels

Page 6: North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting.

Ambient sediment Total Hg

Figure 4-?. ERMS: Total Mercury in Sediment

0

2

4

6

8

10

Total Hg conc., ng/gF

req

uen

cyNo. of observations

24

Geometric mean (ng/g)

20.22

Median (ng/g) 28.22

Range of concentrations

1.52 – 322.3

Goal 1: Ambient mercury levels

Page 7: North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting.

Ambient sediment Total MeHg

No. of observations

24

Geometric mean (ng/g)

0.471

Median (ng/g) 0.214

Range of concentrations

0.014 – 3.867

Goal 1: Ambient mercury levels

ERMS: Total Monomethyl Mercury in Sediment

02468

1012

Total MeHg conc., ng/gF

req

uen

cy

Page 8: North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting.

Ambient Hg residue: piscivorous fish

Goal 1: Ambient mercury levels

Figure 4-?. ERMS: Mercury levels in Piscivorous Fish

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

Bow fin (n=6) Chain Pickerel(n=9)

LargemouthBass (n=71)

Yellow Perch(n=15)

Black Crappie(n=6)

Flathead catf ish(n=3)

Res

idu

e, m

g/k

g

25%ile Median 75%ile Maximum Minimum DHHS Action Level

Black crappie

Page 9: North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting.

Ambient Hg residue: Omnivores and InsectivoresFigure 4-?. ERMS: Mercury Residue in Omnivorous Fish

0

0.05

0.10.15

0.2

0.25

0.30.35

0.4

0.45

Creek chubsucker(n=3)

White catf ish (n=3) Brow n bullhead (n=7) Channel catf ish (n=6)

Res

idu

e, m

g/k

g

25%ile Median 75%ile Minimum Maximum DHHS Action Level

Figure 4-?. ERMS: Mercury Levels in Insectivorous Fish

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

Redbreastsunfish (n=9)

Pumpkinseed(n=4)

Bluegill sunfish(n=18)

Redear sunfish(n=24)

Spotted sucker(n=21)

Silver redhorse(n=3)

Res

idu

e, m

g/k

g

25%ile Median 75%ile

Minimum Maximum DHHS Action Level

Spotted sucker

White catfish

Page 10: North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting.

Bioaccumulation factors

• Bioaccumulation is the uptake and retention of a chemical by a living organism as a result of either intake of food, drinking water, air or direct contact. (EPA 1994b)

• A bioaccumulation factor is defined as :BAF = Residue

C(d)where

Residue = concentration in wet tissue, mg/kgC(d) = concentration of chemical dissolved in H2O,

mg/L

Goal 3: Bioaccumulation

Page 11: North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting.

Bioaccumulation factors, cont.

• Can be species specific, size specific, or trophic level specific– Species specific: e.g., largemouth bass, black

crappie, bluegill sunfish, etc.– Size specific: e.g., largemouth bass of length

40 cm– Trophic level specific: e.g., all of trophic level

3

Goal 3: Bioaccumulation

Page 12: North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting.

Largemouth bass bioaccumulation

• One of three species with a regional advisory by DHHS

• Caught and analyzed at every site in ERMS (makes site-to-site comparison possible)

• Calculate BAFs to all fish caught at a site and to a “normalized” 40-cm bass

• Allow variability in exposure concentration

Goal 3: Bioaccumulation

Page 13: North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting.

Largemouth bass BAFs

Goal 3: Bioaccumulation

Figure 5-?. ERMS Range of Bioaccumulation Factors(All largemouth bass)

0.1

1

10

100

BA

F (

mg

-L/k

g-n

g)

1st quartile Median 3rd quartile "" Lower CL Upper CL

Page 14: North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting.

40-cm Largemouth bass BAFs

Goal 3: Bioaccumulation

Figure 5-?. ERMS: Range of Bioaccumulation Factors (Reference fish: 40-cm LMB)

0.1

1

10

100

BA

F (

mg

-L/k

g-n

g)

Insu

ffic

ient

dat

a

Insu

ffic

ient

dat

a

Page 15: North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting.

What is the significance of BAFs?

• We use the BAFs to calculate the allowable water concentrations of MeHg(d) and ultimately Hg(t).

• Required to implement the AWQC for methylmercury

Goal 3: Bioaccumulation

Page 16: North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting.

Target water column levels

• Evaluate human health endpoint, not wildlife

• Only evaluate to DHHS criteria

• Site-specific water column translators (i.e., MeHg(d)/MeHg(t) and MeHg(t)/Hg(t)) [less confidence in relationships between MeHg(d) and Hg(t)]

Goal 3a: Target water levels

Page 17: North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting.

Target water column levels

Goal 3a: Target water levels

Figure 5-?. ERMS: Range of Target Total Mercury Levels (All largemouth bass)

0.1

1

10

100

Co

nc

en

tra

tio

n,

ng

/L

1st quartile Median 3rd quartile NC WQS Low er CL Upper CL Series7

Page 18: North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting.

Target water column levels, cont.

Goal 3a: Target water levels

Figure 5-?. ERMS: Range of Target Total Mercury Levels(Reference fish: 40-cm LMB)

0.1

1

10

100

Co

nc

en

tra

tio

n,

ng

/L

Central (GM) NC WQS 75%ile ERMS Low er CL Upper CLIn

suff

icie

nt d

ata

Insu

ffic

ient

dat

a

Page 19: North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting.

And now for the big picture…

Houston, we have a problem ...

0.1

1.0

10.0

100.0

1000.0

Lk Waccamaw Waccamaw R ERMS effluent Waccamaw MDNRainwater

To

tal

Hg

co

nc,

ng

/L

1st quartile Median 3rd quartile

Allowable Hg conc.

Page 20: North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting.

Photo-toon by R. Johnson

Page 21: North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting.

Questions?

Michelle WoolfolkDiv. of Water Quality, Modeling Unit(919) 733-5083 ext. [email protected]

Connie BrowerDiv. Of Water Quality, Standards Unit(919) 733-5083 ext. [email protected]