This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
P227R0101 24/05/2018 R Barham T Mason David Tarrant (HaskoningDHV) P227R0102 12/06/2018 R Barham T Mason David Tarrant (HaskoningDHV) P227R0103 07/09/2018 R Barham T Mason David Tarrant (HaskoningDHV) P227R0104 25/01/2019 R Barham T Mason David Tarrant (HaskoningDHV) P227R0105 11/03/2019 R Barham T Mason David Tarrant (HaskoningDHV)
This report is a controlled document. The report documentation page lists the version number,
record of changes, referencing information, abstract and other documentation details.
The ramp up takes place over the first half-hour of piling, starting at ten percent of maximum and
gradually increasing in blow energy and strike rate until reaching the maximum energy, where it stays
for the remaining time.
The monopile scenario contains 10,350 pile strikes over 360 minutes (6 hours, inclusive of soft start
and ramp up). Two pin pile scenarios have been considered and both include 4 individual piles
installed consecutively. One scenario assumes a total of 9,000 strikes over 6 hours (1 hour 30
minutes for each pin pile), and the other assumes a total of 19,800 strikes over 12 hours (3 hours for
each pin pile). For the purposes of noise modelling, it is assumed that there is no pause between
each individual pin pile, and there is continuous exposure.
10% Ramp up 100%
Monopile blow energy 500 kJ Gradual increase 5000 kJ
Number of strikes 150 strikes 300 strikes 9900 strikes
Duration 10 minutes 20 minutes 330 minutes
Table 4-2 Summary of the ramp up scenario used for calculating cumulative SELs for monopiles
10% Ramp up 100%
Pin pile blow energy 270 kJ Gradual increase 2700 kJ
Number of strikes (6h) 150 strikes 300 strikes 1800 strikes
Duration (6h) 10 minutes 20 minutes 60 minutes
Number of strikes (12h) 150 strikes 300 strikes 4500 strikes
Duration (12h) 10 minutes 20 minutes 150 minutes
Table 4-3 Summary of the ramp up scenario used for calculating cumulative SELs for a single pin pile for both duration assumptions (modelling assumes four consecutive piles installed at the same
location)
4.3.2 Source levels
Modelling requires knowledge of the source level, which is the theoretical noise level at 1 m from the
noise source.
The INSPIRE noise propagation model assumes that the noise acts as a single point source. This is
adjusted to take into account the water depth at the noise source location to allow for the length of pile
in contact with the water, which affects the amount of noise that is transmitted from the pile into its
surroundings.
The unweighted SPLpeak and SELss source levels estimated for this project are provided in Table 4-4
results in section 5.1, maximum ranges were predicted for monopiles installed at the deeper SW
location. In general, the pinnipeds have the greatest effect range due to the stricter criteria applied to
this species hearing group.
When considering the two multiple pulse scenarios for pin piles, the 12-hour scenario results in
slightly increased SELcum impact ranges compared to the 6-hour scenario.
Detail for ranges calculated to be less than 50 m for single strike criteria and 100 m for cumulative
criteria have not been included as confidence cannot be given to the accuracy of the results at such
close range.
Results for the initial impact ranges at soft start (500 kJ and 270 kJ for monopile and pin pile,
respectively) and for the maximum energy, including exposure over the entire pile sequence, are
given in separate tables.
Southall et al. (2007) - Auditory Injury Monopile (500 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
locatio
n Unweighted
SPLpeak
Cetaceans 230 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Pinnipeds 218 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
M-Weighted single strike
(SELss)
LF Cetaceans 198 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
MF Cetaceans 198 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
HF Cetaceans 198 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
PW Pinnipeds 186 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
NE
location
Unweighted SPLpeak
Cetaceans 230 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Pinnipeds 218 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
M-Weighted single strike
(SELss)
LF Cetaceans 198 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
MF Cetaceans 198 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
HF Cetaceans 198 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
PW Pinnipeds 186 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Table 5-2 Summary of the single strike impact ranges for auditory injury criteria from Southall et al (2007) for installation of a monopile using the soft start blow energy of 500 kJ
Southall et al. (2007) - Auditory Injury Monopile (5000 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
locatio
n
Unweighted SPLpeak
Cetaceans 230 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Pinnipeds 218 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
M-Weighted single strike
(SELss)
LF Cetaceans 198 dB 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
MF Cetaceans 198 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
HF Cetaceans 198 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
PW Pinnipeds 186 dB 150 m 150 m 140 m
M-Weighted multiple pulse
(SELcum)
LF Cetaceans 198 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
MF Cetaceans 198 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
HF Cetaceans 198 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
PW Pinnipeds 186 dB 3.1 km 2.9 km 2.8 km
NE
location
Unweighted SPLpeak
Cetaceans 230 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Pinnipeds 218 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
M-Weighted single strike
(SELss)
LF Cetaceans 198 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
MF Cetaceans 198 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
HF Cetaceans 198 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
PW Pinnipeds 186 dB 90 m 90 m 80 m
M-Weighted multiple pulse
(SELcum)
LF Cetaceans 198 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
MF Cetaceans 198 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
HF Cetaceans 198 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
PW Pinnipeds 186 dB 300 m 200 m 200 m
Table 5-3 Summary of the impact ranges for auditory injury criteria from Southall et al (2007) for installation of a monopile with a maximum blow energy of 5000 kJ
Table 5-4 Summary of the single strike impact ranges for auditory injury criteria from Southall et al (2007) for installation of pin piles using the soft start blow energy of 270 kJ
Table 5-5 Summary of the impact ranges for auditory injury criteria from Southall et al (2007) for installation of pin piles with a maximum blow energy of 2700 kJ
Table 5-6 Summary of the single strike impact ranges for TTS criteria from Southall et al (2007) for installation of a monopile using the soft start blow energy of 500 kJ
Southall et al. (2007) - TTS Monopile (5000 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
locatio
n Unweighted
SPLpeak
Cetaceans 224 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Pinnipeds 212 dB 80 m 80 m 80 m
M-Weighted single strike
(SELss)
LF Cetaceans 183 dB 350 m 350 m 340 m
MF Cetaceans 183 dB 140 m 140 m 130 m
HF Cetaceans 183 dB 120 m 120 m 110 m
PW Pinnipeds 171 dB 1.1 km 1.1 km 1.1 km
NE
location
Unweighted SPLpeak
Cetaceans 224 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Pinnipeds 212 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
M-Weighted single strike
(SELss)
LF Cetaceans 183 dB 200 m 200 m 190 m
MF Cetaceans 183 dB 80 m 80 m 70 m
HF Cetaceans 183 dB 70 m 70 m 60 m
PW Pinnipeds 171 dB 610 m 610 m 600 m
Table 5-7 Summary of the impact ranges for TTS criteria from Southall et al (2007) for installation of a monopile with a maximum blow energy of 5000 kJ
Southall et al. (2007) - TTS Pin Pile (270 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
locatio
n Unweighted
SPLpeak
Cetaceans 224 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Pinnipeds 212 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
M-Weighted single strike
(SELss)
LF Cetaceans 183 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
MF Cetaceans 183 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
HF Cetaceans 183 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
PW Pinnipeds 171 dB 150 m 150 m 150 m
NE
location
Unweighted SPLpeak
Cetaceans 224 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Pinnipeds 212 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
M-Weighted single strike
(SELss)
LF Cetaceans 183 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
MF Cetaceans 183 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
HF Cetaceans 183 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
PW Pinnipeds 171 dB 70 m 70 m 70 m
Table 5-8 Summary of the single strike impact ranges for TTS criteria from Southall et al (2007) for installation of pin piles using the soft start blow energy of 2700 kJ
Table 5-9 Summary of the impact ranges for TTS criteria from Southall et al (2007) for installation of pin piles with a maximum blow energy of 2700 kJ
Table 5-10 to Table 5-13 include only the behavioural response ranges for LF and MF cetaceans. The
behavioural response ranges for HF cetaceans are given in Table 5-14 to Table 5-17 using the Lucke
et al. (2009) criteria.
Southall et al. (2007) - Behavioural Monopile (500 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
Likely Avoidance (SELss)
LF Cetaceans 152 dB 4.5 km 4.5 km 4.5 km
MF Cetaceans 170 dB 430 m 430 m 430 m
Possible Avoidance (SELss)
LF Cetaceans 142 dB 12 km 12 km 12 km
MF Cetaceans 160 dB 1.7 km 1.7 km 1.7 km
NE
Likely Avoidance (SELss)
LF Cetaceans 152 dB 2.4 km 2.4 km 2.4 km
MF Cetaceans 170 dB 210 m 210 m 210 m
Possible Avoidance (SELss)
LF Cetaceans 142 dB 7.3 km 7.0 km 6.8 km
MF Cetaceans 160 dB 850 m 850 m 850 m
Table 5-10 Summary of the single strike impact ranges for behavioural response criteria from Southall et al (2007) for installation of a monopile using the soft start blow energy of 500 kJ
Southall et al. (2007) - Behavioural Monopile (5000 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
Likely Avoidance (SELss)
LF Cetaceans 152 dB 14 km 14 km 13 km
MF Cetaceans 170 dB 2.0 km 2.0 km 2.0 km
Possible Avoidance (SELss)
LF Cetaceans 142 dB 28 km 27 km 25 km
MF Cetaceans 160 dB 6.6 km 6.5 km 6.4 km
NE
Likely Avoidance (SELss)
LF Cetaceans 152 dB 8.8 km 8.4 km 8.2 km
MF Cetaceans 170 dB 1.1 km 1.1 km 1.1 km
Possible Avoidance (SELss)
LF Cetaceans 142 dB 19 km 18 km 17 km
MF Cetaceans 160 dB 3.9 km 3.8 km 3.7 km
Table 5-11 Summary of the impact ranges for behavioural response criteria from Southall et al (2007) for installation of a monopile with a maximum blow energy of 5000 kJ
Southall et al. (2007) - Behavioural Pin Pile (270 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
Likely Avoidance (SELss)
LF Cetaceans 152 dB 2.7 km 2.7 km 2.7 km
MF Cetaceans 170 dB 230 m 230 m 230 m
Possible Avoidance (SELss)
LF Cetaceans 142 dB 8.3 km 8.2 km 8.0 km
MF Cetaceans 160 dB 940 m 940 m 930 m
NE
Likely Avoidance (SELss)
LF Cetaceans 152 dB 1.4 km 1.4 km 1.4 km
MF Cetaceans 170 dB 120 m 120 m 110 m
Possible Avoidance (SELss)
LF Cetaceans 142 dB 4.7 km 4.6 km 4.4 km
MF Cetaceans 160 dB 470 m 470 m 470 m
Table 5-12 Summary of the single strike impact ranges for behavioural response criteria from Southall et al (2007) for installation of pin piles using the soft start blow energy of 270 kJ
Southall et al. (2007) - Behavioural Pin Pile (2700 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
Likely Avoidance (SELss)
LF Cetaceans 152 dB 11 km 11 km 11 km
MF Cetaceans 170 dB 1.5 km 1.5 km 1.5 km
Possible Avoidance (SELss)
LF Cetaceans 142 dB 25 km 23 km 22 km
MF Cetaceans 160 dB 5.1 km 5.0 km 5.0 km
NE
Likely Avoidance (SELss)
LF Cetaceans 152 dB 7.0 km 6.7 km 6.5 km
MF Cetaceans 170 dB 800 m 800 m 790 m
Possible Avoidance (SELss)
LF Cetaceans 142 dB 16 km 15 km 14 km
MF Cetaceans 160 dB 2.9 km 2.8 km 2.8 km
Table 5-13 Summary of the impact ranges for behavioural response criteria from Southall et al (2007) for installation of pin piles with a maximum blow energy of 2700 kJ
5.2.1.2 Lucke et al. (2009) results
Table 5-14 to Table 5-17 present the predicted impact ranges in terms of the criteria from Lucke et al.
(2009), covering auditory injury, TTS and behavioural reaction in harbour porpoise. These criteria are
defined in section 2.2.2.1. The criteria from Lucke et al. (2009) are all unweighted single strike SELs.
As before, impact ranges less than 50 m have not been given in detail.
Lucke et al. (2009) Monopile (500 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
Auditory injury (SELss) 179 dB 120 m 120 m 120 m
TTS (SELss) 164 dB 980 m 980 m 980 m
Behavioural (SELss) 145 dB 9.4 km 9.3 km 9.0 km
NE
Auditory injury (SELss) 179 dB 60 m 60 m 60 m
TTS (SELss) 164 dB 490 m 490 m 490 m
Behavioural (SELss) 145 dB 5.4 km 5.2 km 5.1 km
Table 5-14 Summary of the single strike impact ranges for criteria from Lucke et al. (2009) for installation of a monopile using the soft start blow energy of 500 kJ
Lucke et al. (2009) Monopile (5000 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
Auditory injury (SELss) 179 dB 610 m 610 m 600 m
TTS (SELss) 164 dB 4.2 km 4.2 km 4.1 km
Behavioural (SELss) 145 dB 24 km 22 km 21 km
NE
Auditory injury (SELss) 179 dB 340 m 340 m 330 m
TTS (SELss) 164 dB 2.4 km 2.4 km 2.4 km
Behavioural (SELss) 145 dB 15 km 15 km 14 km
Table 5-15 Summary of the impact ranges for criteria from Lucke et al. (2009) for installation of a monopile with a maximum blow energy of 5000 kJ
Table 5-16 Summary of the single strike impact ranges for criteria from Lucke et al. (2009) for installation of pin piles using the soft start blow energy of 270 kJ
Lucke et al. (2009) Pin Pile (2700 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
Auditory injury (SELss) 179 dB 440 m 440 m 430 m
TTS (SELss) 164 dB 3.2 km 3.2 km 3.2 km
Behavioural (SELss) 145 dB 20 km 19 km 18 km
NE
Auditory injury (SELss) 179 dB 240 m 240 m 230 m
TTS (SELss) 164 dB 1.8 km 1.7 km 1.7 km
Behavioural (SELss) 145 dB 13 km 12 km 12 km
Table 5-17 Summary of the impact ranges for criteria from Lucke et al. (2009) for installation of pin piles with a maximum blow energy of 2700 kJ
5.2.1.3 NMFS (2016) results
Predicted auditory injury and TTS impact ranges are given in Table 5-18 to Table 5-25 using the
NMFS unweighted SPLpeak and weighted SELcum criteria from NMFS (2016). Again, ranges less than
50 m (SPLpeak) and 100 m (SELcum) have not been given in detail.
NMFS (2016) - Auditory Injury Monopile (500 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
Unweighted SPLpeak
LF Cetaceans 219 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
MF Cetaceans 230 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
HF Cetaceans 202 dB 70 m 70 m 70 m
PW Pinnipeds 218 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
NE
Unweighted SPLpeak
LF Cetaceans 219 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
MF Cetaceans 230 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
HF Cetaceans 202 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
PW Pinnipeds 218 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Table 5-18 Summary of the single strike impact ranges for auditory injury from NMFS (2016) for installation of a monopile using the soft start blow energy of 500 kJ
Table 5-19 Summary of the impact ranges for auditory injury from NMFS (2016) for installation of a monopile with a maximum blow energy of 5000 kJ
NMFS (2016) - Auditory Injury Pin Pile (270 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
Unweighted SPLpeak
LF Cetaceans 219 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
MF Cetaceans 230 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
HF Cetaceans 202 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
PW Pinnipeds 218 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
NE
Unweighted SPLpeak
LF Cetaceans 219 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
MF Cetaceans 230 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
HF Cetaceans 202 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
PW Pinnipeds 218 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Table 5-20 Summary of the single strike impact ranges for auditory injury from NMFS (2016) for installation of pin piles using the soft start blow energy of 270 kJ
Table 5-21 Summary of the impact ranges for auditory injury from NMFS (2016) for installation of pin piles with a maximum blow energy of 2700 kJ
NMFS (2016) - TTS Monopile (500 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
Unweighted SPLpeak
LF Cetaceans 213 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
MF Cetaceans 224 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
HF Cetaceans 196 dB 160 m 160 m 160 m
PW Pinnipeds 212 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
NE
Unweighted SPLpeak
LF Cetaceans 213 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
MF Cetaceans 224 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
HF Cetaceans 196 dB 80 m 80 m 80 m
PW Pinnipeds 212 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Table 5-22 Summary of the single strike impact ranges for TTS from NMFS (2016) for installation of a monopile using the soft start blow energy of 500 kJ
Table 5-23 Summary of the impact ranges for TTS from NMFS (2016) for installation of a monopile with a maximum blow energy of 5000 kJ
NMFS (2016) - TTS Pin Pile (270 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
Unweighted SPLpeak
LF Cetaceans 213 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
MF Cetaceans 224 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
HF Cetaceans 196 dB 90 m 90 m 90 m
PW Pinnipeds 212 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
NE
Unweighted SPLpeak
LF Cetaceans 213 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
MF Cetaceans 224 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
HF Cetaceans 196 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
PW Pinnipeds 212 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Table 5-24 Summary of the single strike impact ranges for TTS from NMFS (2016) for installation of pin piles using the soft start blow energy of 270 kJ
Figure 5-7 Filtered noise inputs for monopiles and pin piles using the MF and HF cetacean filters from
NMFS (2016). The lighter coloured bars show the unweighted third octave levels
5.2.2 Impacts on fish
Table 5-26 to Table 5-37 give the maximum, minimum, and mean impact ranges for species of fish
based on the injury criteria found in the Popper et al. (2014) guidance. For the SELcum criteria, a
fleeing animal speed of 1.5 ms-1 has been used (Hirata, 1999). All the impact thresholds from the
Popper et al. (2014) guidance are unweighted. It should be noted that some of the same noise levels
are used as criteria for multiple effects. This is as per the Popper et al. (2014) guidelines (shown in
Table 2-9), which is based on a comprehensive literature review. The data available to create the
criteria are very limited and most criteria are “greater than”, with a precise threshold not identified. All
ranges associated with criteria defined as “>” are therefore somewhat conservative and in practice the
actual range at which an effect could occur will be somewhat lower. As with the marine mammal
criteria, impact ranges less than 50 m (SPLpeak) and 100 m (SELcum) have not been included.
The results show that fish with swim bladders involved in hearing are the most sensitive to the impact
piling noise with ranges of up to few hundreds of metres for the SPLpeak injury criteria and ranges up
to 6.5 km for TTS (SELcum).
Popper et al. (2014) - Fish (no swim bladder) Monopile (500 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
SPLpeak Mortality and potential
mortal injury > 213 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Recoverable injury > 213 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
NE
SPLpeak Mortality and potential
mortal injury > 213 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Recoverable injury > 213 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Table 5-26 Summary of the single strike impact ranges for fish (no swim bladder) using the criteria from Popper et al. (2014) for installation of a monopile using the soft start blow energy of 500 kJ
Popper et al. (2014) - Fish (no swim bladder) Monopile (5000 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
locatio
n
SPLpeak Mortality and potential
mortal injury > 213 dB 70 m 70 m 70 m
Recoverable injury > 213 dB 70 m 70 m 70 m
SELcum
Mortality and potential mortal injury
> 219 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
Recoverable injury > 216 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m TTS >> 186 dB 6.5 km 6.2 km 5.8 km
NE
location
SPLpeak Mortality and potential
mortal injury > 213 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Recoverable injury > 213 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
SELcum
Mortality and potential mortal injury
> 219 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
Recoverable injury > 216 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m TTS >> 186 dB 2.0 km 1.7 km 1.6 km
Table 5-27 Summary of the impact ranges for fish (no swim bladder) using the criteria from Popper et al. (2014) for installation of a monopile with a maximum blow energy of 5000 kJ
Popper et al. (2014) - Fish (no swim bladder) Pin Pile (270 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
SPLpeak Mortality and potential
mortal injury > 213 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Recoverable injury > 213 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
NE
SPLpeak Mortality and potential
mortal injury > 213 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Recoverable injury > 213 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Table 5-28 Summary of the single strike impact ranges for fish (no swim bladder) using the criteria from Popper et al. (2014) for installation of pin piles using the soft start blow energy of 270 kJ
Popper et al. (2014) - Fish (no swim bladder) Pin Pile (2700 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
locatio
n
SPLpeak Mortality and potential
mortal injury > 213 dB 50 m 50 m 50 m
Recoverable injury > 213 dB 50 m 50 m 50 m
SELcum
(6 hours)
Mortality and potential mortal injury
> 219 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
Recoverable injury > 216 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m TTS >> 186 dB 3.6 km 3.5 km 3.3 km
SELcum
(12 hours)
Mortality and potential mortal injury
> 219 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
Recoverable injury > 216 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m TTS >> 186 dB 4.1 km 3.9 km 3.7 km
NE
location
SPLpeak Mortality and potential
mortal injury > 213 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Recoverable injury > 213 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
SELcum
(6 hours)
Mortality and potential mortal injury
> 219 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
Recoverable injury > 216 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m TTS >> 186 dB 500 m 390 m 300 m
SELcum
(12 hours)
Mortality and potential mortal injury
> 219 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
Recoverable injury > 216 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m TTS >> 186 dB 600 m 460 m 300 m
Table 5-29 Summary of the impact ranges for fish (no swim bladder) using the criteria from Popper et al. (2014) for installation of pin piles with a maximum blow energy of 2700 kJ
Popper et al. (2014) - Fish (swim bladder not involved in hearing)
Monopile (500 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
SPLpeak Mortality and potential
mortal injury > 207 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Recoverable injury > 207 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
NE
SPLpeak Mortality and potential
mortal injury > 207 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Recoverable injury > 207 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Table 5-30 Summary of the single strike impact ranges for fish (swim bladder not involved in hearing) using the criteria from Popper et al. (2014) for installation of a monopile using the soft start blow
energy of 500 kJ
Popper et al. (2014) - Fish (swim bladder not involved in hearing)
Monopile (5000 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
locatio
n
SPLpeak Mortality and potential
mortal injury > 207 dB 170 m 170 m 170 m
Recoverable injury > 207 dB 170 m 170 m 170 m
SELcum
Mortality and potential mortal injury
210 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
Recoverable injury 203 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m TTS > 186 dB 6.5 km 6.2 km 5.8 km
NE
location
SPLpeak Mortality and potential
mortal injury > 207 dB 90 m 90 m 90 m
Recoverable injury > 207 dB 90 m 90 m 90 m
SELcum
Mortality and potential mortal injury
210 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
Recoverable injury 203 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m TTS > 186 dB 2.0 km 1.7 km 1.6 km
Table 5-31 Summary of the impact ranges for fish (swim bladder not involved in hearing) using the criteria from Popper et al. (2014) for installation of a monopile with a maximum blow energy of
5000 kJ
Popper et al. (2014) - Fish (swim bladder not involved in hearing)
Pin Pile (270 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
SPLpeak Mortality and potential
mortal injury > 207 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Recoverable injury > 207 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
NE
SPLpeak Mortality and potential
mortal injury > 207 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Recoverable injury > 207 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Table 5-32 Summary of the single strike impact ranges for fish (swim bladder not involved in hearing) using the criteria from Popper et al. (2014) for installation of pin piles using the soft start blow energy
Popper et al. (2014) - Fish (swim bladder not involved in hearing)
Pin Pile (2700 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
locatio
n
SPLpeak Mortality and potential
mortal injury > 207 dB 120 m 120 m 120 m
Recoverable injury > 207 dB 120 m 120 m 120 m
SELcum
(6 hours)
Mortality and potential mortal injury
210 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
Recoverable injury 203 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m TTS > 186 dB 3.6 km 3.5 km 3.3 km
SELcum
(12 hours)
Mortality and potential mortal injury
210 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
Recoverable injury 203 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m TTS > 186 dB 4.1 km 3.9 km 3.7 km
NE
location
SPLpeak Mortality and potential
mortal injury > 207 dB 60 m 60 m 60 m
Recoverable injury > 207 dB 60 m 60 m 60 m
SELcum
(6 hours)
Mortality and potential mortal injury
210 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
Recoverable injury 203 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m TTS > 186 dB 500 m 390 m 300 m
SELcum
(12 hours)
Mortality and potential mortal injury
210 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
Recoverable injury 203 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m TTS > 186 dB 600 m 460 m 300 m
Table 5-33 Summary of the impact ranges for fish (swim bladder not involved in hearing) using the criteria from Popper et al. (2014) for installation of pin piles with a maximum blow energy of 2700 kJ
Popper et al. (2014) - Fish (swim bladder involved in hearing)
Monopile (500 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
SPLpeak Mortality and potential
mortal injury > 207 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Recoverable injury > 207 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
NE
SPLpeak Mortality and potential
mortal injury > 207 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Recoverable injury > 207 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Table 5-34 Summary of the single strike impact ranges for fish (swim bladder involved in hearing) using the criteria from Popper et al. (2014) for installation of a monopile using the soft start blow
energy of 500 kJ
Popper et al. (2014) - Fish (swim bladder involved in hearing)
Monopile (5000 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
locatio
n
SPLpeak Mortality and potential
mortal injury > 207 dB 170 m 170 m 170 m
Recoverable injury > 207 dB 170 m 170 m 170 m
SELcum
Mortality and potential mortal injury
207 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
Recoverable injury 203 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m TTS 186 dB 6.5 km 6.2 km 5.8 km
NE
location
SPLpeak Mortality and potential
mortal injury > 207 dB 90 m 90 m 90 m
Recoverable injury > 207 dB 90 m 90 m 90 m
SELcum
Mortality and potential mortal injury
207 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
Recoverable injury 203 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m TTS 186 dB 2.0 km 1.7 km 1.6 km
Table 5-35 Summary of the impact ranges for fish (swim bladder involved in hearing) using the criteria from Popper et al. (2014) for installation of a monopile with a maximum blow energy of 5000 kJ
Popper et al. (2014) - Fish (swim bladder involved in hearing)
Pin Pile (270 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
SPLpeak Mortality and potential
mortal injury > 207 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Recoverable injury > 207 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
NE
SPLpeak Mortality and potential
mortal injury > 207 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Recoverable injury > 207 dB < 50 m < 50 m < 50 m
Table 5-36 Summary of the single strike impact ranges for fish (swim bladder involved in hearing) using the criteria from Popper et al. (2014) for installation of pin piles using the soft start blow energy
of 270 kJ
Popper et al. (2014) - Fish (swim bladder involved in hearing)
Pin Pile (2700 kJ)
Maximum Mean Minimum
SW
locatio
n
SPLpeak Mortality and potential
mortal injury > 207 dB 120 m 120 m 120 m
Recoverable injury > 207 dB 120 m 120 m 120 m
SELcum
(6 hours)
Mortality and potential mortal injury
207 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
Recoverable injury 203 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m TTS 186 dB 3.6 km 3.5 km 3.3 km
SELcum
(12 hours)
Mortality and potential mortal injury
207 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
Recoverable injury 203 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m TTS 186 dB 4.1 km 3.9 km 3.7 km
NE
location
SPLpeak Mortality and potential
mortal injury > 207 dB 60 m 60 m 60 m
Recoverable injury > 207 dB 60 m 60 m 60 m
SELcum
(6 hours)
Mortality and potential mortal injury
207 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
Recoverable injury 203 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m TTS 186 dB 500 m 390 m 300 m
SELcum
(12 hours)
Mortality and potential mortal injury
207 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
Recoverable injury 203 dB < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m TTS 186 dB 600 m 460 m 300 m
Table 5-37 Summary of the impact ranges for fish (swim bladder involved in hearing) using the criteria from Popper et al. (2014) for installation of pin piles with a maximum blow energy of 2700 kJ
Although impact piling is expected to be the primary noise source during the Norfolk Boreas
development (Bailey et al. 2014), several other noise sources will also be present. Each of these has
been considered and its impact assessed in this section.
Table 6-1 provides a summary of the various noise producing sources, aside from impact piling, that
could be present during the construction and operation of Norfolk Boreas.
Activity Description
Dredging Trailer suction hopper dredger may be required on site for the export cable, array cable and interconnector cable installation.
Drilling Necessary in case if impact piling refusal
Cable laying Required during the offshore cable installation.
Rock placement Potentially required on site for installation of offshore cables and scour protection.
Trenching Plough trenching may be required during offshore cable installation.
Vessel noise Jack-up barges for piling, substructure and turbine installation. Other large and medium sized vessels on site to carry out other construction tasks, dive support and anchor handling. Other small vessels for crew transport and maintenance on site.
Operational WTG Noise transmitted through the water from operational wind turbine generators. The project design envelope gives turbine sizes of between 9 MW and 20 MW.
Table 6-1 Summary of the possible noise making activities at Norfolk Boreas
The NPL Good Practice Guide 133 for underwater noise (Robinson et al. 2014) indicates that under
certain circumstances, a simple modelling approach may be considered acceptable. High-level
modelling was undertaken using the SPEAR model and is considered sufficient and there would be
little benefit in using a more detailed model for these sources. The limitations of this approach are
noted, including the lack of frequency or bathymetry dependence.
6.2 SPEAR model description
The SPEAR (Simple Propagation Estimator And Ranking) model is based on Subacoustech
Envrionmental’s database of noise measurements. It uses a simple source level and transmission
loss (SL-TL) spreading model for calculating impact ranges produced by the particular noise source.
Results can easily be compared to determine the significance of the predicted impact as either the
effect of the multiple noise sources on one species, or as the effect of one type of noise source
against multiple species with varying hearing abilities. The SPEAR model is intended for the
estimation of impact ranges from relatively low-level noises and also rank ordering of a number of
activities that cause underwater noise in order of significance, so that the critical activities can be
identified and selected or evaluated. Typically SPEAR can be used to identify the effect of a range of
noise sources on a particular species or the effect of a particular noise source on a range of animals.
The simple model does not take bathymetry or other specific environmental parameters into account,
but since it is built around noise data sampled in relatively shallow water around the UK, the relatively
short ranges calculated are expected to be of the correct order at Norfolk Boreas. It is not intended for
detailed modelling outputs, so where impact ranges demonstrate that there may be potentially
significant adverse effects, a more in-depth underwater noise model would be recommended for
For the purposes of identifying the greatest noise impacts, approximate subsea noise levels have
been predicted using a simple modelling approach based on measured data scaled to relevant
parameters for the site. Extrapolated source levels at 1 m range for the construction activities are
presented in Table 6-2. Operational WTGs have been assessed separately in section 6.4.
At these levels, any marine mammal would have to remain in close proximity (i.e. less than 500 m,
and in most cases less than 50 m) from the source for 24 hours to be exposed to levels sufficient to
induce PTS as per NMFS (2016). In most hearing groups, the noise levels are low enough that there
is negligible risk.
There is a low to negligible risk of any injury or TTS to fish, in line with guidance for continuous noise
sources in Popper et al. (2014). These results are summarised in Table 6-3; it is worth noting that
Popper gives different criteria for shipping and continuous noise than the criteria used for impact
piling.
Estimated unweighted
source level Comments
Dredging 186 dB re 1 µPa @ 1 m (RMS) Based on five datasets from suction and cutter suction dredgers.
Drilling 179 dB re 1 µPa @ 1 m (RMS) Based on seven datasets of offshore drilling using a variety of drill sizes and powers.
Cable laying 171 dB re 1 µPa @ 1 m (RMS)
Based on eleven datasets from a pipe laying vessel measuring 300 m in length; this is considered a worst-case noise source for cable laying operations.
Rock placement
172 dB re 1 µPa @ 1 m (RMS) Based on four datasets from rock placement vessel ‘Rollingstone.’
Trenching 172 dB re 1 µPa @ 1 m (RMS) Based on three datasets of measurements from trenching vessels more than 100 m in length.
Vessel noise (large)
171 dB re 1 µPa @ 1 m (RMS)
Based on five datasets of large vessels including container ships, FPSOs and other vessels more than 100 m in length. Vessel speed assumed as 12 knots.
Vessel noise (medium)
164 dB re 1 µPa @ 1 m (RMS) Based on three datasets of moderate sized vessels less than 100 m in length. Vessel speed assumed as 12 knots.
Table 6-2 Summary of the estimated unweighted source levels for the different construction noise sources considered
Due to uncertainty in the calculation of subsea noise propagation close to a relatively large source,
single strike ranges less than 50 m and cumulative ranges less than 100 m are presented to these
The maximum and minimum turbine sizes for Norfolk Boreas have been modelled (9 MW and 20 MW)
to give the expected spread of source levels for operational WTGs.
The estimation of the effects of operational noise in these situations has two features that make it
harder to assess compared with noise sources such as impact piling. Primarily, the problem is one of
level; noise measurements made at many wind farms have demonstrated that the operational noise
produced was at such a low level that it was difficult to measure relative to the background noise
(Cheesman, 2016). Also, an offshore wind farm should be considered as an extended, distributed
noise source, as opposed to a ‘point source’ as would be appropriate for pile driving at a single
location, for example. The measurement techniques used at the sites above have dealt with these
issues by considering the operational noise spectra in terms of levels within and on the edge of the
wind farm (but relatively close in, so that some measurements above background could be detected).
Both turbine sizes considered for this modelling are larger than those for which data is available, listed
in Table 6-4. Norfolk Boreas is also in greater water depths and as such, estimations of a scaling
factor must be highly conservative. However, it is recognised that the available data on which to base
the scaling factor is limited and the extrapolation that must be made is significant.
The operational source levels (as SPLRMS) for the measured sites are given in Table 6-5 (Cheesman,
2016), with an estimated source level for Norfolk Boreas in the bottom two rows. These were derived
from measurement campaigns at each of the identified wind farm sites, based on data at multiple
distances to predict a source level.
To predict to operational noise levels at Norfolk Boreas, the level sampled at each of the sites have
been taken and then a linear correction factor has been included to scale up the source levels (Figure
6-1).
This fit was applied to the data available for operational wind turbine noise as this was the
extrapolation that would lead to the highest, and thus worst case, estimation of source noise level
from the larger 15 MW turbine. This resulted in an estimated source level of 158.5 dB SPLrms, 12 dB
higher than the 6 MW turbine, the largest for which noise data existed. Alternatively, using a
logarithmic fit (3 dB per doubling of power output) to data would lead to a source level of 149.8 dB
SPLrms. A more extreme and unlikely 6 dB increase per doubling of power output would lead to
154.5 dB SPLrms. Thus, the linear estimate used is considerably higher than alternatives and is
considered precautionary.
Unweighted source level (RMS)
Lynn 141 dB re 1 µPa (RMS) @ 1 m
Inner Dowsing 142 dB re 1 µPa (RMS) @ 1 m
Gunfleet Sands 1 & 2 145 dB re 1 µPa (RMS) @ 1 m
Gunfleet Sands 3 146 dB re 1 µPa (RMS) @ 1 m
Norfolk Boreas (9 MW) 150.2 dB re 1 µPa (RMS) @ 1 m
Norfolk Boreas (20 MW) 165.4 dB re 1 µPa (RMS) @ 1 m
Table 6-5 Measured operational noise taken at operational wind farms and the predicted source levels for the sizes of turbine considered at Norfolk Boreas
E227R0104_A1 25/01/2019 R Barham T Mason David Tarrant (HaskoningDHV)
This report is a controlled document. The report documentation page lists the version number, record of changes, referencing information, abstract and other documentation details.
Fish: no swim bladder >219 dB SELcum or >213 dB SPLpeak
>216 dB SELcum or >213 dB SPLpeak
>>186 dB SELcum
Fish: swim bladder is not involved in hearing
210 dB SELcum or >207 dB SPLpeak
203 dB SELcum or >207 dB SPLpeak
>186 dB SELcum
Fish: swim bladder involved in hearing
207 dB SELcum or >207 dB SPLpeak
203 dB SELcum or >207 dB SPLpeak
186 dB SELcum
Eggs and larvae 210 dB SELcum or >207 dB SPLpeak
- -
Table 1 Criteria for assessment of mortality and potential mortal injury, recoverable injury and TTS in species of fish and eggs and larvae as a consequence of impact piling noise (Popper et al., 2014)
Modelling results
Table 2 to Table 4 present the modelled impact ranges based on the Popper et al. (2014) criteria,
showing the increase in predicted ranges when using a stationary animal model compared to the fleeing
animal model used in the main report. Maximum ranges are predicted of 18 km for stationary animals
when considering the 186 dB SELcum criteria for fish during installation of monopiles, and pin piles over
a 12-hour period.
1 Popper A N, Hawkins A D, Fay R R, Mann D A, Bartol S, Carlson T J, Coombs S, Ellison W T, Gentry R L, Halvorsen M B, Løkkeborg S, Rogers P H, Southall B L, Zeddies D G, Tavolga W N (2014). Sound exposure guidelines for Fishes and Sea Turtles. Springer Briefs in Oceanography. DOI 10. 1007/978-3-319-06659-2.
COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE
Annex 1: Comparison of stationary and fleeing impact ranges for fish at Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind
Farm
Subacoustech Environmental Ltd. 3
Document Ref: P227R0104_A1
COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE
As with the main report, detail for ranges calculated to be less than 100 m have not been included as
confidence cannot be given to the accuracy of the results at such close range.
219 dB SELcum 500 m 450 m 400 m < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
216 dB SELcum 700 m 650 m 600 m < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
210 dB SELcum 1.5 km 1.5 km 1.4 km < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
207 dB SELcum 2.2 km 2.1 km 2.0 km < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
203 dB SELcum 3.5 km 3.4 km 3.3 km < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
186 dB SELcum 18 km 17 km 16 km 6.5 km 6.2 km 5.8 km
Table 2 Summary of the SELcum impact ranges for fish using criteria from Popper et al. (2014) for installation of a monopile with a maximum blow energy of 5000 kJ
219 dB SELcum 400 m 350 m 300 m < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
216 dB SELcum 500 m 450 m 400 m < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
210 dB SELcum 1.0 km 950 m 900 m < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
207 dB SELcum 1.4 km 1.4 km 1.3 km < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
203 dB SELcum 2.3 km 2.2 km 2.1 km < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
186 dB SELcum 13 km 13 km 13 km 3.6 km 3.5 km 3.3 km
Table 3 Summary of the SELcum impact ranges for fish using criteria from Popper et al. (2014) for installation of pin piles with a maximum blow energy of 2700 kJ over a period of 6 hours
219 dB SELcum 600 m 550 m 500 m < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
216 dB SELcum 800 m 750 m 700 m < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
210 dB SELcum 1.6 km 1.5 km 1.4 km < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
207 dB SELcum 2.2 km 2.2 km 2.1 km < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
203 dB SELcum 3.6 km 3.5 km 3.4 km < 100 m < 100 m < 100 m
186 dB SELcum 18 km 17 km 17 km 4.1 km 3.9 km 3.7 km
Table 4 Summary of the SELcum impact ranges for fish using criteria from Popper et al. (2014) for installation of pin piles with a maximum blow energy of 2700 kJ over a period of 12 hours
The impact ranges, assuming that the receptor remains static during noise exposure, are considerably
greater than when based on a fleeing assumption. It is worth noting that the nearest low intensity fish
spawning ground, for sole at 17 km to the west (Ellis et al., 20102), is on the edge of the calculated
range in this direction. All other spawning grounds for sole and herring therefore are beyond the
calculated range of impact, based on the worst-case assumption for fish behavioural reaction during
noise exposure.
2 Ellis J R, Milligan S, Readdy L, South A, Taylor N, Brown M (2010). MB5301 Mapping spawning and nursery areas of species to be considered for Marine Protected Areas (Marine Conservation Zones). Report No 1: Final Report on development of derived data layers for 40 mobile species considered to be of conservation importance. Cefas report for Defra, August 2010.