Top Banner
Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective Israeli Center for Third Sector Research March 2008 Mark Sidel University of Iowa
24

Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

Jan 17, 2022

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

Israeli Center for Third Sector ResearchMarch 2008

Mark Sidel

University of Iowa

Page 2: Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

For Nonprofits,A New Self-Regulation Imperative –

Around the World

Why are Nonprofits focusing on Governing Their Own Sector in

Addition to Government Regulation?

2

Page 3: Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

Why Self-Regulation?

• The Problem – Even Crisis – of Nonprofit Accountability and Legitimacy in Some Countries

• Increasing Government Intervention

• Increasing Media Scrutiny

• Increased Nonprofit Scrutiny of its Own

• The New Context of Counter-Terrorism

3

Page 4: Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

The Multiple Motivationsfor Nonprofit Self-Regulation

• Sectoral Defense Against Encroaching Regulation

• Improving Standards in the Sector and Weeding Out Weaker Actors

• Reshaping Public Perception of the Sector

• Public Education for Nonprofit Organizations, Boards, and Staff

4

Page 5: Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

The Multiple Motivationsfor Nonprofit Self-Regulation

• A Means or Condition for Accessing Government or Donor Funding

• Learning Opportunity for Nonprofits and Networks

• Market Mechanism to Exclude Unproductive Actors

• Market Mechanism to Exclude Competitive Actors, Benefitting Remaining Players

5

Page 6: Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

The Multiple Motivationsfor Nonprofit Self-Regulation

• Competitive Opportunity for Self-Regulatory Service Providers

• An Opportunity for Differential Government or Legislative Preference for Certain Networks or Service Providers

6

Page 7: Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

Typologies of Nonprofit Self-Regulation

• Voluntary or Required

• Guidelines, Voluntary Codes of Conduct, Codes of Conduct with Certification, Organizational Certification to Standards, Accreditation, Rankings and Ratings

• National, Sub-Sectoral, Sub-National?

• Carrots? Conditioning of Donor Funding, Government Funding, Tax Status

7

Page 8: Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective:

The United States

• Long History in the United States, Especially Sectoral

• Growing Pressure from Congress and the Press

• Senate Finance Committee

• Staff Recommendations

8

Page 9: Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

The United States (continued)

• Panel on the Nonprofit Sector and Independent Sector

• Principles for Good Governance and Ethical Practice: A Guide for Charities and Foundations (2007)

• The Contours of the Debate over the Principles for Good Governance and Ethical Practice

9

Page 10: Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

Key Problems for Nonprofit Self-Regulation in the U.S.

• The Question of Enforcement

• The Problem of “Layering” – Multiple Systems for Local, Sub-Sectoral, and National Self-Regulation: Example: “Iowa Land Trust”

• The Burden on Local, Smaller and Advocacy Groups

• Guarantor of Quality – or of Market Position?

10

Page 11: Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

Key Problems for Nonprofit Self-Regulation in the United states

• The Emergence of Self-Regulatory Entrepreneurs

• Does Self-Regulation Discourage Diversity in Approach, in Participation, in Goals?

• Self-Regulation and The Role of Education for Nonprofit Boards, Leaders, and Staff

11

Page 12: Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

The Philippines

• Earliest Models of Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Asia, in a Society with a Vibrant NGO Culture

• Self-Regulation with Government Support: A Challenge or Boon to Collective Action

• Government Determination of Tax Status Devolved to the Nonprofit Sector Through Self-Regulation

• The Philippine Council for Nonprofit Certification (PCNC)

12

Page 13: Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

The Philippines

• Best Example Worldwide of Government-NGO Collaboration on Self-Regulation

• Standards and Implementation through PCNC

• Issues: Labor Intensive; Easier for Larger Groups?; Conflicts Within the State

• The Merged Model of Collective Action and Government Support

• The PCNC Throughout Asia

13

Page 14: Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

India

• Multiple Experiments, Multiple Motivations

• Overall, Collective Action for Sectoral Self-Defense to Forestall Stricter Government Regulation

• Also Increasing Public Trust, and Quality

• The Variety of Typologies

• Voluntary Guidelines; Information Provision, Certification; Standards and Enforcement

14

Page 15: Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

India

• From Guidelines to Standards: A Long and Tortuous Process

• Three Models Today

• “Intranet” Self-Regulations: Donors Governing Recipients

• Code of Conduct, Standards, and the Struggle for Enforcement: The Credibility Alliance

15

Page 16: Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

India

• Transparency as a Self-Regulatory Tool: Guidestar India (and earlier initiatives)

• The Government’s Attitude Toward Self-Regulation: National Policy on the Voluntary Sector

16

Page 17: Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

Pakistan

• Self-Regulatory Initiative Along Philippine Lines: Collective Action and Tax Status

• A Slow Process

17

Page 18: Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

Cambodia

• Self-Regulation as Collective Action to Defend and Unify a Fractured and Attacked Sector

• Earlier Efforts

• Code of Ethical Standards and Minimum Standards for NGOs in Cambodia

– Goals, and the Struggle for Implementation

18

Page 19: Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

Advantages and Obstaclesto Self-Regulation

• The Educational Function

• The Unifying Function

• The Standard Setting Function

• Utility vis-à-vis Government

• Utility vis-à-vis the Public

19

Page 20: Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

Advantages and Obstaclesto Self-Regulation

• The Transition to Enforcement

• Financial Sustainability of Self-Regulatory Models

• Scaling Up

• “Layering”: Multiple and Overlapping Self-Regulation Systems in One Country

– National, Sectoral, and Sub-National

– Donors, Regulators, and Self-Regulators

20

Page 21: Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

Issues in Self-Regulation

• Enforcement

• Outliers Don’t Obey Anyway

• The Burdens on Local and Smaller Groups

• Does Nonprofit Self-Regulation Discourage –Even Prevent – Innovation and Non-Mainstream Practices?

• Is Nonprofit Self-Regulation Unfriendly to Advocacy?

21

Page 22: Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

The New Context for Nonprofit Self-Regulation: Counter-Terrorism• The Collective Action Paradigm: Network

Activity to Forestall Stricter Regulation

• The U.S. Example: Layers of New Regulation and Requirements after September 11

• The Sectoral Response in the U.S.:

Principles of International Charity

• Fear and Self-Regulation: The United Way

22

Page 23: Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

Counter-Terrorismand Nonprofit Self-Regulation

• Principles of Accountability for International Philanthropy (EFC and COF)

• UK Charity Commission: Enhancing Self-Regulation, Preserving Enabling Environment

• Montreux Initiative and Humanitarian Forum

• Self-Regulation as a Real Measure to Prevent Terrorist Financing, or a Tool in Dialogue with Government?

23

Page 24: Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Comparative Perspective

The Complex Future for Nonprofit Self-Regulation

And my thanks to ICTR and all of you

24