Nonlinear Performance and Potential Damage of Degraded Structures Under Different Earthquakes The 5 th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering “Facing Earthquake Challenges Together” May 4-8 2015, Tongji University Shanghai, China Case study of ground motion and response spectra comparison of the Wenchuan (2008) and Lushan (2013) earthquakes Yuxin Pan Structural & Earthquake Engineering / Dr. Carlos E Ventura M.Phil | The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong (2012) PhD Candidate | The University of British Columbia, Canada (2013 - Present) May 7 th , 2015
24
Embed
Nonlinear Performance and Potential Damage of …risedr.tongji.edu.cn/ubc/PPT/5.7/student 4/6 Yuxin PAN.pdf · Nonlinear Performance and Potential Damage of Degraded Structures Under
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Nonlinear Performance and Potential Damage of Degraded Structures Under Different Earthquakes
The 5th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering
“Facing Earthquake Challenges Together” May 4-8 2015, Tongji University Shanghai, China
Case study of ground motion and response spectra comparison of the Wenchuan (2008) and Lushan (2013) earthquakes
Yuxin PanStructural & Earthquake Engineering / Dr. Carlos E Ventura
M.Phil | The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong (2012)
PhD Candidate | The University of British Columbia, Canada (2013 - Present)
May 7th, 2015
Background & Objectives
General Seismicity of Selected Stations
Numerical Model of Equivalent SDOF System
Analysis Results & Discussions
• Inelastic hysteretic response
• Arias intensity vs. drift limit
• Elastic & inelastic response spectra
Conclusions & Future Works
Outline
Research background
Crustal EQs
Intraplate EQs
Interplate EQsCascadia Seismic Sources
Historical Eqs in Canada
SI_for_Kobe 72SI_for_Llayllay 81
cm Max_DiplacementLlayllay 15cm Max_Diplacement_Kobe 20
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7020
10
0
10
20
Time (s)
Dis
pla
cem
ent
(cm
)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7020
10
0
10
20
Time (s)
Dis
pla
cem
ent
(cm
)
cm / sMax_Velocity_Kobe 74cm / sMax_Velocity_Llayllay 73
Directivity is an effect of a fault rupturing whereby earthquake ground motion in the direction of rupture propagation is more severe than that in other directions from the earthquake source.
8
5249150 0 150
150
150Particle Velocity (cm/s)
E/W direction
N/S
direction
150 0 150
150
150Particle Velocity (cm/s)
E/W direction
N/S
direction
200 0 200
200
200Particle Displacement (cm)
E/W direction
N/S
direction
S 1
200 0 200
200
200Particle Displacement (cm)
E/W direction
N/S
direction
Research background
Fig. Intensity map for Wenchuan and Lushan EQs
In 2008, there was an big earthquake with Mw of 7.9 occurred in Wenchuan, Sichuan Province of China. Fiveyears later, in 2013, another earthquake with Mw of 7.0 took place at the same region (Lushan, Sichuan Province)along the Long Men Shan fault.
This study mainly analyzed the ground motion records at same stations from bothearthquakes, and compared the elastic and inelastic response spectra for a typicalSDOF in-filled reinforced concrete (RC) structure by considering the stiffness andstrength degradation. Response of different capacity levels’ structures (100% Fy,75% Fy, … 10% Fy) will also be investigated.
Four main stations were selected forcomparison, both east-west (EW) andnorth-south (NS) ground motions wereanalyzed, as seen in Figure. They are51YAM, 51LSF, 51QLY and 51YAL.These four stations recorded themaximum PGA of Lushan Earthquake.
Fig. Elastic spectra comparison
Fig. Arias Intensity and significant duration (5%-95%)
Elastic spectra & Arias intensity
Directivity
12
51LSF
Location 30.021N 102.895E
Site Condition Soil
Distance to Wenchuan Epicenter 119.3 KM
PGA of Wenchuan EQ 124.1 CM/S2 (EW)
Distance to Lushan Epicenter 32.6 KM
PGA of Lushan EQ 387.4 CM/S2 (EW)
13
51QLY
Location 30.407N 103.266E
Site Condition Soil
Distance to Wenchuan Epicenter 67.2 KM
PGA of Wenchuan EQ 199.8 CM/S2 (NS)
Distance to Lushan Epicenter 28.2 KM
PGA of Lushan EQ 315.5 CM/S2 (NS)
Directivity
Equivalent SDOF System
Experimental Test
Reinforced Concrete Partially Infilled Frames; OpenSees modeling: Hysteretic material; Strength and stiffness degradation; No pinching effect was considered; 10% collapse drift limit
Reference: Anil, Ö zgür, and Sinan Altin. "An experimental study on reinforced concrete partially infilled frames." EngineeringStructures 29.3 (2007): 449-460.
-600
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
-0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0 0.02 0.04 0.06
Mo
me
nt
Rotation
Hysteretic Curve of Equivalent SDOF
Fy
0.75Fy
0.5Fy
0.25Fy
0.1Fy
Zerolengthelement
Rigid column
Mass
Numerical model in OpenSees
Inelastic hysteretic response
51YAM_Lushan_EW
51YAM_Wenchuan_EW
Short Period (T=0.5s)
51YAM_Lushan_EW
51YAM_Wenchuan_EW
Medium Period (T=1.0s)
Inelastic hysteretic response
Inelastic hysteretic response
51YAM_Lushan_EW
51YAM_Wenchuan_EW
Long Period (T=2.0s)
Drift limit vs. Significant duration
51YAM_Lushan_EW 51YAM_Wenchuan_EW
Elastic & inelastic response spectra
For each station, both N-S and E-W directions were studied. The design earthquake spectra and rare earthquake spectra (2% in 50 years)
based on Chinese Code for Seismic Design of Buildings (CCSDB) were also plottedfor comparison.
CCSDB 51YAM 51LSF 51QLY 51YAL
Design Intensity 7 7 7 7
Design EQ Acceleration 0.10g 0.15g 0.10g 0.15g
Rate EQ Acceleration 0.50g 0.72g 0.50g 0.72g
Characteristic Period 0.45s 0.40s 0.45s 0.45s
Site Category II II II II
Design EQ Category 3rd 2nd 3rd 3rd
Damping Ratio 5%
0
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
1.5
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Sa (
g)
Period (s)
Design Acceleration from CCSDB
Design EQ - 51LSF
Rare EQ - 51LSF
Design EQ - 51YAM
Rare EQ - 51YAM
Elastic & inelastic response spectra
51YAM (N-S)
Elastic & inelastic response spectra
51LSF (E-W)
Conclusions
For the four selected stations, the Lushan Earthquake has much higherPGA, but larger drift demands resulted from the Wenchuan Earthquake;
Both elastic and inelastic spectra from Lushan Earthquake are higherthan the local design spectra, and could be higher than rare earthquakespectra;
Overall, long period structures have larger displacements, but this trendvaries with different capacity levels;
For the Wenchuan Earthquake, as expected, elastic system performedbetter than those weaker systems. However, for the Lushan Earthquake,elastic systems generated larger displacement at different period ranges.