Non Traditional Students They are working adults or non-working adults. Many are at or below the poverty line. The majority receive full Title IV funding.

Non Traditional Students• They are working adults or non-working adults.

• Many are at or below the poverty line.

• The majority receive full Title IV funding.

• They are parents and many are single mothers.

• They have never been to college or have tried college and been unsuccessful.

• They have limited or no family support in terms of resources – money, child care, transportation.

• They have life issues which can and do derail them in their quest for a better life.

  2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013

Female 80 84 81 82  

Male 20 16 19 18  

Full time 88 71 85 79  

Part time 12 29 15 21  

2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013

Asian 2 1 1 <1  

Black 29 22 26 25  

Hispanic 16 10 12 11  

White 55 65 58 62

2+races 2 1 2

Full and part time 18-24 25-34 35 plus

2008-2009 40 37 30

2009-2010 42 39 26

2010-2011 32 32 36

2011-2012 29 35 35

2012-2013

STUDENT DEMOGRAPHICSThe following data from the most recent IPEDS describes OBC’s student population. Reported in percentages:

Age Distribution:

Ethnicity Statistics:

Computerized Technology

Performance Based Outcomes• Retention• Placement• Graduate Satisfaction• Employer Satisfaction

Student Learning Outcomes• Review of Grades• Faculty Performance• GPA Analysis• IT Certifications• CMA Certifications

MANAGEMENT OF THE CAMPUS EFFECTIVENESS PLAN

Assessment Tool Criteria Timeline Responsibility Benchmark Results

Retention AIR/CAR Historical Rates and Key Operating Stats Quarterly RG, DH, DOE 74% Page 23-25

Placement AIR/CAR Historical Rates, Key Operating Stats,& rates in OH Monthly/Quarterly

CS 72% Page 26-28

StudentLearning Outcomes

Reviewof Grades

Data is collected in Diamond D at the end of the quarter for active students and analyzed.

Quarterly DOE, DH, RG 70% of students receive grades of A,B, and C

Page 29-30

Faculty Performance Review

Faculty are reviewed annually and rated on a scale of 1-5. Data is collected as reviews occur and analyzed.

Annually DOE, DIR Rating of 3 as a minimum standard & 93%

Page 30-31

Student Evaluation of Faculty

Week 5,6 students are surveyed online. Surveys include facility, coursework and instructor effectiveness. Data is collected and analyzed.

Quarterly DIR, DOE, DH 82% faculty effectiveness

Page 31-32

GPA Analysis

Data is collected for all active students in Diamond D at the end of the quarter and analyzed.

Quarterly DIR,DOEDH, RG

85% of students receive GPA>=2.00

Page 32-34

IT Certifications

Upon course completion students can sit for the ITCompTia Certification Exams at OBC. Vouchers are valid for 1 year. Results are received immediately and analyzed.

Ongoing DOE, DH 70% attempt 70%pass Page 34-36

CMA Certification

CMA Certification exam through the AAMA. Fourth quarter students apply to take the exam which is paid for as part of the enrollment agreement. Exam is scheduled after course completion and results sent to the student.

Ongoing DOE, DH 90% attempt 70% passBased on CAHHEP standards

Page 36-38

Graduate Satisfaction

Graduate Surveys

Data is collected during exit interviews and analyzed Quarterly CS,DIR, DOE 90%satisfaction Page 38-40

Employer Satisfaction

Employer Surveys

Data is collected by phone, mail and online on an ongoing basis and analyzed

Quarterly CS, DIR 90%satisfaction Page 40-42

Assessment of Campus Effectiveness

CEP Review and Adjustment

The Directors meet annually to review the results of the IEP and to plan for improvements.

Annually IEP All benchmarks met Page 42-43

Responsibility CodesDIR Director RG RegistrarDH Department Heads CEP CEP CommitteeCS Career Services Personnel DOE Director of Education

ASSESSMENT OF CAMPUS EFFECTIVENESS

Assessment Tool Responsibility Benchmark Results

Retention AIR RG, DH, DOE 75% 76%Placement AIR CS 71% 94%StudentLearning Outcomes

Reviewof Grades

DOE, DH, RG 70% of students receive grades of A,B, and C Met Metric

Faculty Performance Review

DOE, DIR Rating of 3 as a minimum standard for faculty & 93% Met Metric

Student Evaluation of Faculty

DIR, DOE, DH 80% faculty effectiveness Met Metric

GPA Analysis

DIR,DOE,DH, RG 85% of students receive GPA>=2.00 Didn’t meet Metric(at 80%)

IT Certifications

DOE, DH 70% attempt 70%pass No but improvement noted

CMA /RMACertification

DOE, DH 90% attempt 70% passBased on CAHHEP standards

No and yes81%/71% RMA CMA results

Graduate Satisfaction

Graduate Surveys

CS,DIR, DOE 90%satisfaction>95%

Employer Satisfaction

Employer Surveys CS, DIR 90%satisfaction>95%

Assessment of Institutional Effectiveness

IEP Review and Adjustment IEP All benchmarks met Page 42

“A Framework for Understanding Poverty”Dr. Ruby K Payne

• Faculty preparation and professional development.

• How adult learners learn – relevancy is paramount.

• Classroom instruction has to be student centered.

• Support services that focus on academics and life skills.

• Create a future orientation.