Nokia Plo 2g Counter Kpi

8/9/2019 Nokia Plo 2g Counter Kpi

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nokia-plo-2g-counter-kpi 1/24

PLO 2G

Workshop,16 June 2010



Process Implementation New site

Process for PLO



Process Implementation Upgrade

In process upgrading TRX, there isn’t used Lock Value, after Implementation, check alarm, if clear,can be anouncement that site is on Air



Lock Value

For Site RFI, The easurement for lock !alue min " hourl#,

Denses Urban, Urban, Sub Urban : 3%



Measurement

$%I measurements statistics are measured &' hours aggregation usingdata from (SS s#stem) ethod and scope as follo*s+

i) For ne* sites + using three"- consecuti!e da#s measurement

ii) For *ork description s*ap .et*ork /lement, Relocation

.et*ork /lement, and Relocation /0pansion ./, all $%I

parameter *ill be monitored for " *orking da#s before and "*orkingda#s after)

iii) For upgrading *ith additional sector1antenna

i!) For upgrading *ithout additional antenna)



2ased on Tinem ", For .e*site *e ha!e onitoring 3$%I +

Voice +

4) S5SR S5667 Success Rate 8-

&) 7(SR 7and (!er Success Rate 8-

") T675R T67 5rop Rate 8-5ata+

4) T2F5LR T2F 5o*n9link /stablishment SuccessRate 8-

&) T2F:LR T2F uplink /stablishment Success Rate8-

") T2FSR T2F Success Rate 8-

Additional onitoring +

4) Tra;c < T672

&) Share Tra;c < $%I Surronding =st la#er

5ri!e Test+4) 6SSR

&) 5ropped 6alls

") 7(SR

') RX >ual ?9@

@) S>I94

3) Idle R0 Le!el B 9C? d2mD) Attach Success Ratio

KPI Newsite



2ased on Tinem ", For :pgrade *e ha!e onitoring 3$%I +

Voice +

4) S5SR S5667 Success Rate 8-

&) 7(SR 7and (!er Success Rate 8-

") T675R T67 5rop Rate 8-

5ata+

4) T2F5LR T2F 5o*n9link /stablishment SuccessRate 8-

&) T2F:LR T2F uplink /stablishment Success Rate8-

") T2FSR T2F Success Rate 8-

Additional onitoring +

4) Tra;c < T672

&) $%I Surronding =st la#er

5ri!e Test for additional antenna1additional sector+

4) Idle < 5edicated R0 Le!el

&) RX >ual ?9@

") S>I ?94

KPI Upgrade



FormulaKPI NSN

SDSR (! 100*(((SDCCH_ASSIGN+SDCCH_HO_SEIZ)-(SDCCH_RADIO_FAIL+SDCCH_A_IF_FAIL_CALL+SDCCH_AIS_FAIL_CALL+SDCCH_!SER_AC"+SDCCH_CS!_RESE"+SDCCH_NE"#_AC"+SDCCH_"S_FAIL+SDCCH_LAPD_FAIL+SDCCH_RF_OLD_HO+SDCCH_AIS_FAIL_OLD+SDCCH_A_IF_FAIL_OLD))$SDCCH_SEIZ_A"")

"#$ Drop (! 100*s%&('ro_fer_c_ss,. -"CH_RE_ES"_ASSIGN)$s%&(c_.e/_c_ss,.)

$%SR (! 100*s%&(&sc_o_s%cc_o+sc_o_s%cc_o+ce_s%cc_o)$(s%&(&sc_o_c_c_+&sc_o_s'cc_c_+&sc_o_s'cc_)+s%&(sc_o_c_c_+sc_o_s'cc_c_+sc_o_s'cc_)+s%&(ce_c_c_+ce_s'cc_c_+ce_s'cc_))

"&F DL 'stalis)ment SR (! 100-(100*S%&(2NO_RADIO_RES_A3A_DL_"F4)$S%&(2RE5_1_"SL_DL4+2RE5_6_"SL_DL4+2RE5_7_"SL_DL4+2RE5_8_"SL_DL4+2RE5_9_:_"SL_DL4))

"&F UL 'stalis)ment SR (! 100-(100*S%&(NO_RADIO_RES_A3A_!L_"F)$S%&(RE5_1_"SL_!L+RE5_6_ "SL_!L+RE5_7_"SL_!L+RE5_8_"SL_!L+RE5_9_:_"SL_!L))

"&F #ompletion SR (! 100*(1-(S%&(.r_of_%_f+.r_of_'_f-%_f_es,s&e._f,e'-'_f_es,s&e._f,e'-%_ers_f_re_'%e_.o_res-'_ers_f_re_'%e_.o_res-;e_'%r_%_f-;e_'%r_'_f-%_f_re_'%e_o_f%s-'_f_re_'%e_o_f%s-%_f_re_'%e_o_s%se.'-'_f_re_'%e_o_s%se.')$S%&(.r_of_%_f+.r_of_'_f-%_f_es,s&e._f,e'-'_f_es,s&e._f,e'-%_ers_f_re_'%e_.o_res-'_ers_f_re_'%e_.o_res-%_f_re_'%e_o_f%s-'_f_re_'%e_o_f%s-%_f_re_'%e_o_s%se.'-'_f_re_'%e_o_s%se.')))



*+ ,cceptance Value

Target for acceptance ES1 56S based on 6luster



NP" (Network per-ormance "arget!



SDSRKPI NSN

SDSR (! 100*(((SDCCH_ASSIGN+SDCCH_HO_SEIZ)-(SDCCH_RADIO_FAIL+SDCCH_A_IF_FAIL_CALL+SDCCH_AIS_FAIL_CALL+SDCCH_!SER_AC"+SDCCH_ CS!_RESE"+SDCCH_NE"#_AC"+SDCCH_"S_FAIL+SDCCH_LAPD_FAIL+SDCCH_RF_OLD_HO+SDCCH_AIS_FAIL_OLD+SDCCH_A_IF_FAIL_OLD))$SDCCH_SEIZ_A"")

SDRC%seRFC

Cec< SDSR

SD o<,.Cec< SD o.

"R=>A''SDCCH

SD Dro C%se

SDRC%seA,sCSDRC%seRFO' SDRC%seA,sO' SDRC%seA,fC SDRC%seA,fO' SDRC%seLAPD

Cec< RF>Fre?>@ALLID>C.e Pr&eer Cec< ,. Pr SC

O;er soo

Cec< ,. Pr @SC

LAC$CI re'Cree or .oB

Cec< r& forLAPD ,. "S

es

No



$%SRKPI NSN

$%SR (! 100*s%&(&sc_o_s%cc_o+sc_o_s%cc_o+ce_s%cc_o)$(s%&(&sc_o_c_c_+&sc_o_s'cc_c_+&sc_o_s'cc_)+s%&(sc_o_c_c_+sc_o_s'cc_c_+sc_o_s'cc_)+s%&(ce_c_c_+ce_s'cc_c_+ce_s'cc_))

C%se!LLe;e

Cec< HOSR HO A.s,s HO Dro

C%se!L5%,

C%seDLLe;e

C%seDL5%,

SC%se!LI.erfere.ce

C%seDLI.erfere.ce

C%se!&re

C%sePG"

C%seDR

C%seRFD

C%seERFD

C%seS@@

No "CH A;,e ,. re ce

"CH "re oc<,.>(ND 197)

@<e %s,f,c,o.

Cec< 5%, "R=> Cec<Pr&eer

Cec< Fre?> "R=>

Cec< HO LE3EL !@RELLA

Cec< @r,. PG"

Cec< HOC

Cec< HOC

Cec< F@"

Cec< ADE

ND 197



"#$DR%PKPI NSN

"#$ Drop (! 100*s%&('ro_fer_c_ss,. -"CH_RE_ES"_ASSIGN)$s%&(c_.e/_c_ss,.)

C%seRFC

Cec< "CHDROP

"CHDro C%se

C%seA,sCC%seRFO' C%seA,sO' C%se"RC C%se"RO' C%seA,fC C%seA,fO' C%seLAPD

Cec< fre?>@ALLID>Cec<Pr&eer

Cec< ,. SC

O;eersoo or .oB

Cec< ,. SC

O;eersoo or .oB

Cec< ,. Pr @SC

LAC$CI re'Cree or .oB

Cec< r& forLAPD ,. "S



Sample NDND ./0

ND ./1

.5 4C3, For 6heck >ualit#of TRX, see on >@, if thereis measure under C?8 on>@ :L15L, sucpectproblem on that TRX,

For Intrf fre must be 4)?,if greather than 4)?,suspect interference

.5 4C@, For 6heck >ualit#of 2alance per TRX



ND .12

.5 4@", for 6heckAdGacenc#, *e can seethat site blocking17(failure to adGe



ND *2*

.5 &"&, for check TATime Ad!ance- forthat site)

.5 D?, for check a0AdGacenc#

ND 34



ND 0.

.5 34, for check nons#metrical AdGacen#,one*a# adGacenc#-



Sample S5, Report





S)are "ra--ic

S l KPI S di Fi t L



Sample KPI Surrounding Fist La6er

O. A,r

O. A,r

$%SR +D+M'+,M'NDN+MD.

7)6 88

SDSR +D+M'+,M'NDN+MD.



Sample KPI Surrounding Fist La6er "#$DR%P +D+M'+,MN+MD.

O. A,r



,N,L9SIS : R'#%M'D,"I%N For SDSR M'+,M'NDUN+M+.

O. A,r

7)6 88

SDSR +D+M'+,M'NDN+MD.

Anal#sis +

2ased on T>ALL S5SR ofsite /EA/.5:.EE4

decrease 6aused A2IS 6Allhigh &?9&4 a#-) 2ut from&& a# until no* theperformance S5SR of site/EA/.5:.EE4 isgood)

Recommendation+ after &4a# The performance S5SR

is good so *e don’t needgi!e to recommendation)



Nokia Plo 2g Counter Kpi

Documents