2/12/2019 1 Noise: Health Effects, Measurements, & Controls 2019 Indiana Safety & Health Conference 9:00 a.m. ‐ 12:00 p.m. February 26, 2019 ©2019, A Havics 1 Andrew A. “Tony” Havics, CIH, PE pH2, LLC Decibel Hell ©2019, A Havics 2
2/12/2019
1
Noise: Health Effects, Measurements, & Controls
2019 Indiana Safety & Health Conference
9:00 a.m. ‐ 12:00 p.m.February 26, 2019
©2019, A Havics 1
Andrew A. “Tony” Havics, CIH, PEpH2, LLC
Decibel Hell
©2019, A Havics 2
2/12/2019
2
©2019, A Havics 3
Which would you choose to “keep” if for the rest of your life you could only have one of your two senses – your hearing or your vision?
©2019, A Havics 4
“…after a lifetime in silence and darkness that to be deaf is a greater affliction than to be blind…I have imagination, the power of association, the sense of touch, smell, and taste, and I never feel blind, but how can I replace the loss of hearing?”
‐ Helen Adams Keller (1880‐1968)
2/12/2019
3
Some Facts
• 75% of farm workers have some hearing loss
– Source: NY Center for Agriculture and Medicine
• The sound system in your car is louder than the sound system the Beetles used for their concerts in the 1960s. They only had 300 Amp speakers.
©2019, A Havics 5
Anatomy & Hearing
©2019, A Havics 6
2/12/2019
4
The Ear
©2019, A Havics 7
©2019, A Havics 8
The Occupational Environment – It’s Evaluation and Control, 3rd Ed., D. Anna, Editor, American Industrial Hygiene Assoc. Press, Fairfax, VA, 2011.
2/12/2019
5
©2019, A Havics 9
The Occupational Environment – It’s Evaluation and Control, 3rd Ed., D. Anna, Editor, American Industrial Hygiene Assoc. Press, Fairfax, VA, 2011.
Sound & Noise Fundamentals
©2019, A Havics 10
2/12/2019
6
General Waveform Explanation
©2019, A Havics 11
Sound moves about 340 m/s
Wave definitions
©2019, A Havics 12
Air at Sea Level
The Occupational Environment – It’s Evaluation and Control, 3rd Ed., D. Anna, Editor, American Industrial Hygiene Assoc. Press, Fairfax, VA, 2011.
DON’T PANIC ‐ YET
2/12/2019
7
Typical Sound Variation
©2019, A Havics 13
Frequency
©2019, A Havics 14
The human hears approximately 20 Hz to 10,000 Hz
Q: What is Hertz?
2/12/2019
8
Wavelength of Sound in the Air
©2019, A Havics 15
Frequency (Hz) Wavelength
31.5 35.8 ft
63 17.9
125 9.0
250 4.5
500 2.2
1000 1.1
2000 6.7 in
4000 3.4
8000 1.7
Speed of Sound
©2019, A Havics 16
Material Speed (fps)
Air 1,100
Lead 4,000
Water 4,500
Concrete 10,000
Glass 12,400
Wood 14,000
Steel 17,000
Iron 17,000
2/12/2019
9
Sound Pressure Level
©2019, A Havics 17
Q: How many Pascals is Ambient Air Pressure?
Perceived Loudness
©2019, A Havics 18
2/12/2019
10
A‐, B‐, C‐Weighting Scales
©2019, A Havics 19
C W e ig h tin gB W e ig h tin gA W e ig th in g
10 100 1,000 10,000
F re q ue nc y (Hz)
-80
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
Re
lativ
e R
esp
onse
(dB
)
Typical Values for SPL
©2019, A Havics 20
2/12/2019
11
Speech Interference
©2019, A Havics 21
The Occupational Environment – It’s Evaluation and Control, 3rd Ed., D. Anna, Editor, American Industrial Hygiene Assoc. Press, Fairfax, VA, 2011.
OSHA PEL
©2019, A Havics 22
The Occupational Environment – It’s Evaluation and Control, 3rd Ed., D. Anna, Editor, American Industrial Hygiene Assoc. Press, Fairfax, VA, 2011.
2/12/2019
12
OSHA PEL
©2019, A Havics 23
5 dB 2X
5 dB 2X
Exchange Rate = 5 dB
The Occupational Environment – It’s Evaluation and Control, 3rd Ed., D. Anna, Editor, American Industrial Hygiene Assoc. Press, Fairfax, VA, 2011.
Level v. Dose
©2019, A Havics 24
2/12/2019
13
Dose Example: Eng/Admin Controls
©2019, A Havics 25
D = C1 + C2 + C3 ……. Cn
T1 T2 T3 ……. TnX 100, percent
D = 4 + 2 + 2
4 4 8X 100, percent
D = (0 + 0.5 + 0.25) X 100 = 75%
80 dBA for 4 hours95 dBA for 2 hours90 dBA for 2 hours
D = DoseC = Amount of time exposed at specified noise levelT = Amount of time allowed at specified noise level
0
See Handout Also
A‐Weighting for All Limits
©2019, A Havics 26
C W e ig h tin gB W e ig h tin gA W e ig th in g
10 100 1,000 10,000
F re q ue nc y (Hz)
-80
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
Re
lativ
e R
esp
onse
(dB
)
2/12/2019
14
TWA Calculation
• A dose of 1.0 (100%) is equivalent to a time‐weighted average (TWA) of 90 dBA.
©2019, A Havics 27
TWA Calculation Example
©2019, A Havics 28
TWA = 16.61 Log10[D/100] + 90
TWA = 16.61 Log10[75/100] + 90
TWA = 16.61 Log10[0.75] + 90
TWA = 16.61 [‐0.12494] + 90
TWA = ‐2.08 + 90
TWA = 87.92
87.92 < PEL of 90 dBA so OK
Previous Example ‐ D = (0 + 0.5 + 0.25) X 100 = 75%
See Handout Also
2/12/2019
15
©2019, A Havics 29The Occupational Environment – It’s Evaluation and Control, 3rd Ed., D. Anna, Editor, American Industrial Hygiene Assoc. Press, Fairfax, VA, 2011.
What about Determining Time for Other Limits?
©2019, A Havics 30
TSPL = 8/(2(L‐Th)/ER) hours
Where:
TSPL = Time allowed at a Sound Pressure Level LL = SPL of noise for that time periodTh = Threshold LimitER = Exchange Rate
2/12/2019
16
NIOSH REL
©2019, A Havics 31
TSPL = 8/(2(L‐Th)/ER) hours
Where:
TSPL = ??L = 90 dBATh = 85 dbAER = 3 dBA
TSPL = 8/(2(90‐85)/3) hours
TSPL = 8/(2(5/3)) hours
TSPL = 8/(3.31748) hours
TSPL = 2.41 hours = 145 min
One is allowed 90 dBA for 480 minute for OSHA; What is it for NIOSH?
Different Exposure Limits in Perspective
OSHANavyACGIH, NIOSH, Air Force, Army
050
0
1,00
0
1,500
2,00
0
2,50
0
Allowable Time (min)
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
SP
L (
dB
A)
©2019, A Havics 32
2/12/2019
17
Health Effects & NIHL
©2019, A Havics 33
Adverse Effects on Man
©2019, A Havics 34
2/12/2019
18
©2019, A Havics 35
Speech
Speech Interference
• Speech Interference Level (PSIL)
• PSIL = Avg SPL for 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz
©2019, A Havics 36
Wilson, Noise Control, 1989
2/12/2019
19
Sleep Interference
• Noise Exposure Forecast (NEF)
• LDN = NEF + 35 dBA
©2019, A Havics 37
Wilson, Noise Control, 1989
Learning Interference
• Aircraft noise
• Train noise
• Traffic and street noise
©2019, A Havics 38
Shield, The effects of noise on children at school, a review, J Bldg Acoustics, 10, 2, 97‐106, 2003.Haines, Chronic aircraft noise exposure, stress responses, mental health and cognitive performance in school children, Pyschol Med, 31, 2, 365‐277, 2001
2/12/2019
20
Measuring NIHL
©2019, A Havics 39
Normal Audiogram
©2019, A Havics 40
Plogg, Barbara, and Patricia Quinlan, Eds.: Fundamentals of Industrial Hygiene, 5th Edition. National Safety Council, Itasca, IL. 2002.
2/12/2019
21
Typical Hearing Loss Audiograms
©2019, A Havics 41
Early Loss
Intermediate Loss
Advanced Loss
Plogg, Barbara, and Patricia Quinlan, Eds.: Fundamentals of Industrial Hygiene, 5th Edition. National Safety Council, Itasca, IL. 2002.
Threshold Shift
• (10) Standard threshold shift. (i) As used in this section, a standard threshold shift is a change in hearing threshold relative to the baseline audiogram of an average of 10 dB or more at 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz in either ear
©2019, A Havics 42
DEMO
2/12/2019
22
Noise Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL)
• Noise‐Induced Temporary Threshold Shift (NITTS)– a decrease in hearing sensitivity that typically returns to its former level within a few minutes to a few hours
• Noise‐Induced Permanent Threshold Shift (NIPTS)– irreversible sensorineural hearing loss
• Tinnitus
©2019, A Havics 43
Hearing Impairment Threshold
©2019, A Havics 44
% Excess Risk of HL%Total Risk of HL
70 80 90 100 110
8-Hr TWA SPL (dBA)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Ris
k of
Hea
ring
Loss
(%)
Based on data from: Prince, A re‐examination of risk estimates from the NIOSH Occupational Noise and Hearing Survey (ONHS), J Acoust Soc Am, 101, 2, 950‐963, 1997
2/12/2019
23
Hearing Protection
©2019, A Havics 45
©2019, A Havics 46
Hearing Protection
• Use:
– When engineering controls can’t reduce noise enough
– For employees with noted hearing loss
– While engineering controls are being implemented
2/12/2019
24
©2019, A Havics 47
Hearing Protection Devices (HPDs)
©2019, A Havics 48
2/12/2019
25
Lab v Reality
©2019, A Havics 49
Not Wearing All The Time
©2019, A Havics 50
2/12/2019
26
Noise Measurement
©2019, A Havics 51
©2019, A Havics 52
2/12/2019
27
Noise Source Addition
©2019, A Havics 53
AIHA: The Occupational Environment: Its Evaluation, Control, and Management, 3rd edition.
DEMO
Noise Source Addition
©2019, A Havics 54
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Source Difference (dB)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Am
ount
Ad
ded
to H
igh
er S
ourc
e (d
B)
2/12/2019
28
Noise Source Addition Example 1
©2019, A Havics 55
One Source to 85 dBA
Source Controlled Controlled Controlled
Lp Lp Lp Lp
90 85 90 90
90 90 90 90
90 90 90 90
90 90 90 90
93 93 85 93
95 95 95 85
Added Source Sound
99.62 99.28 98.74 98.00
93
95
96
98
100
+2
+3
+1
+2
+2
Noise Source Addition Example 2
©2019, A Havics 56
Two Sources to 85 dBA
Source Controlled Controlled Controlled
Lp Lp Lp Lp
90 85 90 85
90 85 90 90
90 90 90 90
90 90 85 90
93 93 85 85
95 95 95 85
Added Source Sound
99.62 98.92 98.32 95.96
2/12/2019
29
Octave Bands
©2019, A Havics 57
1/3 Octave Bands
©2019, A Havics 58
2/12/2019
30
Commonly Used
©2019, A Havics 59
1/1 v 1/3 Octave Bands
©2019, A Havics 60
2/12/2019
31
Sound Levels Meters (SLMs)
• Sound level meters used by OSHA meet American National Standards Institute (ANSI)– Standard S1.4‐1971 (R1976) or S1.4‐1983, "Specifications for Sound Level Meters."
• Types 0, 1, and 2.– Type 0 is used in laboratories.
– Type 1 is used for precision measurements in the field.
– Type 2 is used for general purpose measurements
©2019, A Havics 61
Sound Levels Meters (SLMs)
©2019, A Havics 62
ANSI S1.4‐1983
2/12/2019
32
Meter Response Time
• Fast response
• corresponds to a 125‐millisecond (ms) time constant.
• Slow response
• corresponds to a 1‐second time constant
©2019, A Havics 63
Dosimetry
• On the Person
– Microphone near Lapel
– OSHA defines the hearing zone as a 2‐foot‐wide sphere surrounding the head
• Criterion Setups
– single or multiple
• Batteries last 8‐10 hours
©2019, A Havics 64
2/12/2019
33
Typical OSHA Setup
©2019, A Havics 65
Selection Setting forHearing
Conservation
Setting forAdministrative and
Engineering Controls
Threshold 80 dBA 90 dBA
Criterion Level 90 dBA 90 dBA
Exchange Rate 5 dB 5 dB
Frequency Weighting A A
Response Rate Slow Slow
Peak Threshold 140 dBA 140 dBA
Limit 85 dBA AL 90 dBA PEL
Microphone
• Protect from wind and harsh materials
• Wind screens are optional indoors if air currents are minimal
• Always use a windscreen in areas with air motion, outdoors, and in dusty locations or during jobs when the microphone might get dirty
©2019, A Havics 66
Similar for SLM
2/12/2019
34
SPL vs Distance
©2019, A Havics 67
Calibration
©2019, A Havics 68
2/12/2019
35
Calibration
©2019, A Havics 69
Meter Specifics
©2019, A Havics 70
2/12/2019
36
Noise Control
©2019, A Havics 71
Principle 1 ‐ Identify Sources of Noise and Their Importance
• Sound is Generated by:
– Vibrating surfaces: panels, pipes, etc.
– Mechanical impacts: presses, dropped parts, etc.
– Pulsating gas flows: exhausts
– Air flow over surfaces: ducts, wind, etc.
– Compression & rarefaction of medium: gears mashing, blade passage frequency, etc.
©2019, A Havics 72
DEMO
2/12/2019
37
Principle 1 ‐ Identify Sources of Noise and Their Importance
• Obtain frequency spectrum
• Turn components on & off
• Use temporary controls (mufflers, lagging, enclosures)
• Conduct near‐field readings
• Measure vibration spectrum
• Plot frequency data to observe possible BPF, gear meshing, etc.
©2019, A Havics 73
©2019, A Havics 74
Driscoll, AIHA PDC 431, Noise Control Engineering, 1999
2/12/2019
38
Principle 1 ‐ Identify Sources of Noise and Their Importance
• Prioritizing for Noise Control:
– Plot linear versus A‐weighted
– Rank noise order sources (dBA)
– Determine interrelationship between noise source and receiver
– Consider benefit to employees in the area
– Consider Noise Criteria
©2019, A Havics 75
Variable Speed Fan (at Maximum): A‐Weighted v Linear
©2019, A Havics 76
A-WeightedLinear
8 16 32 64 128
256
512
1,024
2,048
4,096
8,192
16,38
4
32,76
8
Frequency (Hz)
-50
0
50
100
SP
L (d
B)
2/12/2019
39
Rank Order
©2019, A Havics 77
Blower
Elect
ric M
otor
Gea
rbox
Pipel
ine
Pump
Equipment Type
50
70
90
110
SP
L (d
BA
) 85.081.0
88.0
95.091.0
Principle 2 – List & Evaluate Possible Noise Control Procedures as they Apply to Source, Path and Receiver
©2019, A Havics 78
Possible noise control procedures for:
Source Path Receiver
Modify Enclosure Enclosure
Redesign Absorption Absorption
Relocate Barrier Relocate
2/12/2019
40
Treatment at Source:
©2019, A Havics 79
Treatment of Sound Path:
©2019, A Havics 80
liadur.czNewWell
2/12/2019
41
Treatment of Receiver:
©2019, A Havics 81
http://www.iac‐acoustics.com/us/soundproof‐rooms‐and‐booths/medical/audiology‐booths/
Principle 3 – Identify Relative Contributions for Direct and Reflected
Sound
©2019, A Havics 82
Total Sound Level = Direct + Reflected
Direct & Reverberant
2/12/2019
42
Principle 4
• Sound Absorption– is realized by materials, usually porous, which dissipate acoustic energy in the form of heat
– light weight fibrous or foam material
• Sound Isolation– is realized by materials that are poor transmitters
– dense, heavy
• See EAR DEMOs
©2019, A Havics 83
Principle 5 – Identify the Significance of Flanking Paths
• Flanking path
– any route by which sound waves travel from a source to a receiver
– airborne or structure‐borne
©2019, A Havics 84
DEMO
2/12/2019
43
Effect of Opening Size
©2019, A Havics 85
10% opening
1% opening
0.1% openingApprox. 38‐29 = 9 dB
0.1%
1 SFout of 1,000 SF
86
Effect of Distance on Noise
Free-field presumption
0 10 20 30 40 50 60Distance from Sound Source (feet)
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
SP
L (
dB
A)
100 dBA at 5 ft from source
SPLd2 = SPLd1 + 20 Log [d1/d2]
6 dBA
6 dBA
6 dBA
©2019, A Havics
2/12/2019
44
Total Sound
©2019, A Havics 87
Absorption
©2019, A Havics 88
2/12/2019
45
Absorption
©2019, A Havics 89
Room Effect
©2019, A Havics 90
2,0001,0005002001005020105
TA
0.12
5
0.25
0
0.50
0
1.00
0
2.00
0
4.00
0
8.00
0
16.0
00
32.0
00
64.0
00
r/Q (r in feet)
-30
-20
-10
0
10
Lp -
Lw
(dB
)
Direct
Reverberant/Room Effect
2/12/2019
46
Q‐Factor
©2019, A Havics 91
DEMO
Compressed Air
• SPL % (speed)8
• So reduce air speed as low as possible
©2019, A Havics 92
2/12/2019
47
Electric Motors
• If an enclosure is used, increase number of blades
• Higher BPF making wavelengths shorter & frequency higher –thus easier to control
©2019, A Havics 93
Questions?
©2019, A Havics 94
Andrew Anthony “Tony” Havics, PE
pH2, LLC
5250 E US Highway 36, Suite 830
Avon, IN 46123
(317) 718‐7020 Office