Stack Test &port No. 84-3 James Julian, Inc. Narth East, Cecil Co. Fioehg Drum Mix Asphalt Plant May 1984 Division of Stationary Source Ehfor-t Air Managemsnt Mmbistration Office of Enviranmental Program Department af Health and Mental Hygiene state of Mary1aI-d Approved by Ronald E. Lip"& May 31, 1984
18
Embed
No. 84-3 · Stack Test &port No. 84-3 James Julian, Inc. Narth East, ... mthod 1005 as . con* in . AMA . TM 83-05, Stack Test Methods . ... 9.07 14~99 . 13.13 \i017 . 4.0 . 10 ...
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Stack Test &port No. 84-3
James Julian, Inc. Narth Eas t , Cecil Co.
Fioehg Drum Mix Asphalt P l a n t May 1984
Div i s ion of Stationary Source Ehfor-t Air Managemsnt Mmbistration
Office of Enviranmental Program Department af Health and Mental Hygiene
state of Mary1aI-d
Approved by Ronald E. Lip"&
May 31, 1984
EPA
Text Box
Note: This is a reference cited in AP 42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume I Stationary Point and Area Sources. AP42 is located on the EPA web site at www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ The file name refers to the reference number, the AP42 chapter and section. The file name "ref02_c01s02.pdf" would mean the reference is from AP42 chapter 1 section 2. The reference may be from a previous version of the section and no longer cited. The primary source should always be checked.
Introduction :
Particula& stack tests were conducted in May, 1984 on the exhaust emissions £ran the Boeing drum mix asphalt plant operated by Jams Julian, Inc, located in North East, C e c i l County. The tests were conducted i n an effor t to determine whether o r not the fac i l i ty was being operated within canpliance of applicable Maryland S t a t e air quality regulations,
The emissions are controlled by a venturi scrubber folluwed by a cyclone depnister, Although the plant is rrawnally rated a t 600 TPH, the tests were conducted a t the n o d production rate of 275 TPH, The capacity of the storage silo (100 tons) necessitated running each test in t w o halves, By starting with an enpty s i l o and having seueral trucJcs standing by, the plant was able to opexate for the required 45 minutes needed to make A m l e traverse. This inc luda the 36 minutes of sampling plus a period to allm the plant to stabilize. During all three tests, the plant was Using virgin material.
This fac i l i ty was tested in mrdance w i t h mthod 1005 as con* in AMA TM 83-05, Stack Test Methods for Stat ionary Souroes, The controlling
- standard for this source is the federal New Source P e r f o m c e Standard of
R e s u l t s :
A sumnary of the results is presented in table 1-1. Canplete results and prirrrary data are contained i n the al?pendix.
Table 1-1. Summary of Particulate Sampling Results For:
84-3 Jamep Julian, Inc. - Ebdng aMn mix asphpl$,,plant I I '
9kbased on front half catch
2oncentsatio:
004
.04
-04
Run ID
5/2/84-1
5/3/84-1
5/3/84-2
Average
Concentration* (grainslscfd)
-092
.025
. 0077
.065
?
Emission Rate*
( lbslhr)
21.5
5 -4
16.9
14.6
r
Production rate (WH)
275
275
275
Isokinetic Variation
(%I
99.8
101.6
102.2
flow rate (scfm dry)
27282
25495
25731
Data
7. C02
3.5
4.6
3.5
Average Stack
temp (OF)
144
143
145
7. Hz0
22.2
22.3
23.4
Gas
7. 02
12.8
13.0
13.0
APPENDIX :
Nomenclature Calculated Resu l t s Data Summaries Laboratory Ana Lyses Primary Data Calibration Data Preliminary Stack Test Survey
Barometric pressure, pb = 30.23 in Hg Calibrated by ?= J $
a If there i s only one thermometer on t he dry gas meter, record the temperature under td.
AH, in*
H2°
0.5
1.0
1.5
2-0
3*0
4-0
Quality Assurance Ha~dbook 145-2.3A ( f r o n t side)
in. m@i H ~ O
1,793
LB20
1,831 ll857 1957
'i
,966
.?% ,997 ,988 ,'?9 2
AH - 13.6 - - 0.0368
0.0737
0.110
0-147
0-221 :
0.294
Time @I>
min
l3.08
9.07
14~99 13.13 \i017
4.0 10 I,o,558
>
Ori f ice manometer
s e t t i n g (Am,
in. H20
0.5
1.0
vW Pb(td + 460) - - 'i AH
P + 1 (tw + 460)
Temperatures
.90/4, I
0.0317 bX [(t;w+ 460) '12 m@i = P, (td + 460)
h
Wet t e s t m - meter (tJ,
OF
79.5
79,s 79.5
79, y
79,5
79,s
Gas volume
1,771
>,(3 5 30.. 23x 5 4 2 . 7 ) I+6. -I- s 3 4.5) lot 3 22?"j?.L 8 . e o . n x ( 30.34-X f 3 9 , ~ > 10 (3 &,-z 3 X s7o.e)
10. t53 ( 30,38>( 539,s 1 0 1 3 o o 2 3 ~ ~ 7 o * ~ to, S 8 L ( 30: 45)( 5 3 "r l> 10(30 .~ .3 \1571*7 . I p317(43 , . \ c S 3 q l S > 4.13 / t
i o .ySg( 3 0 . 5 2 3 5 3 9 -
.s) 30.1 3 (571,7) L 1 0 J
W e t t e s t meter (Vw),
f t3
-: - 5 s
5
1.5 I 10
Dry gas meter (Vd) 9
f t 3
s,a+t 5.22+
to.628
Dry gas meter -
2.0 10 I )08~53
3.0 10 1 )4.582 11117 (9.13 . 124-
~ v g ' (tdL OF
925
101,7
108.5 110.4 iIo.5
99.3
I n l e t (td 1,
i OF
102.3
104.3 118.3
121 121.7
Outlet (td 1,
o "F
92.7
4 6 98*7
44.7 99.3
Page 1
MARYLAM) STATE BUREAU OF AIR QUALITY & NOISE CQRIXOL
STACX SAMPLIK; PRELPIIMRY SURVEY
I. General Infomat ion: /
Plant JOMS 1 PQspkc~if f
Address I r
Telephone 30 1 - 28 7 - 91 7/ S u m y Date
Source
~ o n t a c t ( s ) :
fi 'GO/ kL T i t l e *
T i t l e Ext.
T i t l e Bxt.
Process Description ( including type, operating schedule, feed canposit ion and
rates , production, rate, maximum rated capacity, and type of fuel) :
Notes :
Page 2
MARYLAND STATE - BAQNC -
PRBLIMINARY SURVEY
Plant ~~~ // //
Source u ,I
, ,
Survey Date 5&/8 ?‘- I I
11. Stack Data:
Material of Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Height of Sample S i t e from Ground Level, ( f t ) . . . . . . . . . . n/ S o Inside Cross Sectional Dimensions a t Test S i t e L . . . . . . . . . 5-3 ( t
. . . . . . . . Inside,Cross - Sectional Area a t Test S i te , ( f t 2 ) .