Top Banner
Spectroscopy Analysis of Natural Products-1 21.01.201 4 EFG-704 By Omer Bayazeid
36
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: NMR spectroscopy

Spectroscopy Analysis of Natural

Products-1

21.01.2014 EFG-704

By Omer Bayazeid

Page 2: NMR spectroscopy
Page 3: NMR spectroscopy

Introduction:

Origanum vulgare (Lamiaceae) is a perennial herb distributed in Europe,NorthAfrica,America and Asia.

The herb is widely used as a spice in Western diets, and is also commonly used as a traditional medicine for the treatment of various diseases, such as cold, cough, and digestive disorders.

Page 4: NMR spectroscopy

The plant is known for its powerful antimicrobial and antioxidant activities.

The antimicrobial activity of O. vulgare is due to its high content of volatile oils.

The phenolic compounds including flavonoids and phenolic acids, another kind of constituent in O. vulgare, are responsible for its antioxidant activity.

Page 5: NMR spectroscopy

In their work, they report the isolation of six new phenolic compounds (1–6) from O. vulgare, along with known ones:2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid, 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid, rosmarinic acid, origanoside.

Page 6: NMR spectroscopy

The structures of the new compounds were identified with spectroscopic analyses and acid hydrolysis experiments.

Plant material:

Whole plants of O. vulgare were collected in China, in September 2012.

Page 7: NMR spectroscopy

Extraction and isolation:

The air-dried whole plants of O. vulgare (10.0 kg) were powdered and percolated with 95% (V/V) ethanol solution at room temperature. For Isolation Column chromatography and TLC was performed using precoated silica gel GF254 plates.

Page 8: NMR spectroscopy

Identification of Compounds:

Compound-1:

4-[[(2’,5’-dihydroxybenzoy- l)oxy]methyl] phenyl-O-b-D-glucopyranoside

Page 9: NMR spectroscopy

Carbon No.

Type of

Carbon

13C Signal δ/ppm

1H signalδ/ppm

1 Cq 157.3 -

2,6 CH 116.3 7.05 (d,8.6)

3,5 CH 129.7 7.37 (d,8.4)

4 Cq 129.8 -

7 CH2 065.4 5.16 (s)

Ring A

Page 10: NMR spectroscopy

Carbon No.

Type of

Carbon

13C Signal δ/ppm

1H signalδ/ppm

1’ Cq 120.6 -

2’ Cq 150.6 -

3’ CH 115.5 6.81 (d, 8.3)

4’ CH 122.0 7.34 (dd, 8.3,2.1)

5’ Cq 145.1 -

6’ CH 116.3 7.38 (d, 2.1)

7’ Cq 165.6 -

Ring B

Page 11: NMR spectroscopy

Carbon No.

Type of

Carbon

13C Signal δ/ppm

1H signalδ/ppm

1’’’ CH 100.4 4.89 (d,7.4)

2’’’ CH 73.3 3.26 (m)

3’’’ CH 76.7 3.34 (m)

4’’’ CH 69.8 3.18 (m)

5’’’ CH 77.1 3.27 (m)6’’’ CH2 60.8 3.70(m)

3.74(m)

Sugar Part

D-glucose

Page 12: NMR spectroscopy

HMBC

The NMR data of ring B were identical to those of 2,5-dihydroxy- benzoic acid ,suggesting ring B had two hydroxyls at C-2’ and C-5’ positions, respectively.  It was also confirmed by the 1H–1H COSY and HMBC correlations

Page 13: NMR spectroscopy

Identification of Compounds:

Compound-2:

4-[[(3’,4’-dihydroxybenzoyl)oxy]methyl]phenyl-O-B-D-[6-O-(3’’,5’’-dimethoxyl-4’’-hydrox- ybenzoyl)] glucopyranoside

Page 14: NMR spectroscopy

Carbon No.

Type of

Carbon

13C Signal δ/ppm

1H signalδ/ppm

1 Cq 159.0 -

2,6 CH 117.9 7.03 (d,8.6)

3,5 CH 130.7 7.18 (d,8.6)

4 Cq 132.0 -

7 CH2 067.1 5.16 (s)

Ring A

Page 15: NMR spectroscopy

Carbon No.

Type of

Carbon

13C Signal

δ/ppm

1H signalδ/ppm

1’ Cq 122.9 -

2’ CH 117.6 7.47 (d)

3’ Cq 146.3 -

4’ Cq 152.0 -

5’ CH 116.1 6.85 (d, 8.0)

6’ CH 123.9 7.48 (dd, 8.0,2.4)

7’ Cq 168.3 -

Ring B

Page 16: NMR spectroscopy

Carbon No.

Type of

Carbon

13C Signal δ/ppm

1H signalδ/ppm

1’’ Cq 121.5 -

2’’,6’’

CH 108.7 7.33 (s)

3’’,5’’

Cq 149.1 -

4’’ Cq 142.4 -

7’’ Cq 168.0 -

3’’,5’-OMe

CH3 057.1 3.83 (s)

Ring C

Page 17: NMR spectroscopy

Sugar Part Carbon No.

Type of

Carbon

13C Signal δ/ppm

1H signalδ/ppm

1’’’ CH 102.3 4.93 (d,7.4)

2’’’ CH 75.0 3.81 (m)

3’’’ CH 78.1 3.51 (m)

4’’’ CH 72.3 3.51 (m)

5’’’ CH 75.8 3.79 (m)

6’’’ CH2 65.4 4.73 (m) 4.42 (m)

D-glucose

Page 18: NMR spectroscopy

HMBC

The HMBC correlations between δH 4.73 (H-6’’’) and δC 168 (C-7’’) suggested the benzoyl was connected to C-6’’’ through an ester bond.

The positions of methoxy groups were elucidated by the HMBC correlations.

Page 19: NMR spectroscopy

Identification of Compound:

Compound-3:

acacetin 7-O-[4’’’O-acetyl-b-D-apiofuransyl-(1 -3)]- b-D-xylopyranoside

Page 20: NMR spectroscopy

Ring ACarbon No.

Type of Carbon

13C Signal

δ/ppm

1H signalδ/ppm

2 Cq 163.8 -

3 CH 103.8 6.95 (s)

4 Cq 182.0 -

5 CH 161.1 12.91 (s)

6 CH 099.1 6.38 (d, 2.0)

7 Cq 162.4 -

8 CH 094.4 6.81 (d, 2.0)

9 Cq 157.0 -

10 Cq 105.4 -

Page 21: NMR spectroscopy

Carbon No.

Type of

Carbon

13C Signal

δ/ppm

1H signalδ/ppm

Ring B1’ Cq 122.6 -

2’,6’ Cq 128.4 8.08 (br d, 8.8)

3’,5’ CH 114.6 7.12 (br d, 8.8)

4’ Cq 162.5 -

4’-OMe

Cq 55.6 3.88 (s)

D-xylose

D-apiose

Page 22: NMR spectroscopy

Carbon No.

Type of

Carbon

13C Signal δ/ppm

1H signalδ/ppm

1’’ CH 98.2 5.20 (d,7.6)

2’’ CH 75.3 3.52 (m)

3’’ CH 76.5 3.43 (m)

4’’ CH 69.4 3.41 (m)

5’’ CH2 65.7 3.76 (m)3.42 (m)

Sugar Part 1

Page 23: NMR spectroscopy

Sugar Part 2

Carbon No.

Type of

Carbon

13C Signal δ/ppm

1H signalδ/ppm

1’’’ CH 108.2 5.38 (br s)

2’’’ CH 76.7 3.43 (m)

3’’’ Cq 77.2 -

4’’’ CH2 73.8 3.98 (m)3.73 (m)

5’’’ CH 67.0 3.92 (s)

Ac CqCH3

169.920.3

-1.82 (s)

Page 24: NMR spectroscopy

HMBC

Page 25: NMR spectroscopy

Identification of Compounds:

Compound-4/5:

apigenin 7-O-[6’’’- O-acetyl-b-D-galactopyranosyl-(1 -3)]-b-D-xylopyranoside.

Page 26: NMR spectroscopy

Ring ACarbon No.

Type of Carbon

13C Signal

δ/ppm

1H signalδ/ppm

2 Cq 164.3 -

3 CH 103.1 6.95 (s)

4 Cq 182.0 -

5 CH 161.1 12.91 (s)

6 CH 099.5 6.38 (d, 2.0)

7 Cq 162.6 -

8 CH 094.7 6.81 (d, 2.0)

9 Cq 156.9 -

10 Cq 105.4 -

Page 27: NMR spectroscopy

Carbon No.

Type of

Carbon

13C Signal

δ/ppm

1H signalδ/ppm

Ring B1’ Cq 121.0 -

2’,6’ Cq 128.6 8.08 (br d, 8.8)

3’,5’ CH 116.0 7.12 (br d, 8.8)

4’ Cq 161.4 -

4’-OMe

Cq 55.6 3.88 (s)

Page 28: NMR spectroscopy

Carbon No.

Type of

Carbon

13C Signal δ/ppm

1H signalδ/ppm

1’’ CH 98.7 5.24 (d,7.6)

2’’ CH 75.4 3.52 (m)

3’’ CH 82.7 3.42 (m)

4’’ CH 68.8 3.41 (m)

5’’ CH2 65.6 3.76 (m)3.42 (m)

Sugar Part 1

D-xylose

Page 29: NMR spectroscopy

Sugar Part 2

Carbon No.

Type of

Carbon

13C Signal δ/ppm

1H signalδ/ppm

1’’’ CH 104.7 4.51 (d,7.6)

2’’’ CH 74.5 3.05 (m)

3’’’ CH 75.9 3.24 (m)

4’’’ CH 69.7 3.06 (m)

5’’’ CH 73.7 3.42 (m)

6’’ CH2 63.5 3.99 (m)4.09 (m)

Ac CqCH3

170.320.3

-1.82 (s)

D-glactose

Page 30: NMR spectroscopy

HMBC

Page 31: NMR spectroscopy

Identification of Compound:

Compound-6:

Page 32: NMR spectroscopy

Ring ACarbon No.

Type of Carbon

13C Signal

δ/ppm

1H signalδ/ppm

2 Cq 163.8 -

3 CH 103.1 6.95 (s)

4 Cq 182.0 -

5 CH 161.1 12.91 (s)

6 CH 099.6 6.38 (d, 2.0)

7 Cq 162.5 -

8 CH 094.9 6.80 (d, 2.0)

9 Cq 156.9 -

10 Cq 105.4 -

Page 33: NMR spectroscopy

Carbon No.

Type of

Carbon

13C Signal

δ/ppm

1H signalδ/ppm

Ring B1’ Cq 122.7 -

2’,6’ Cq 128.4 8.08 (br d, 8.8)

3’,5’ CH 114.6 7.12 (br d, 8.8)

4’ Cq 162.9 -

4’-OMe

Cq 55.6 3.87 (s)

Page 34: NMR spectroscopy

Sugar Part 1

Carbon No.

Type of

Carbon

13C Signal δ/ppm

1H signalδ/ppm

1’’ CH 98.3 5.24 (d,6.3)

2’’ CH 83.3 3.51 (m)

3’’ CH 75.6 3.22 (m)

4’’ CH 69.1 3.26 (m)

5’’ CH2 77.0 3.50 (m)3.42 (m)

6’’ CH2 60.5 3.73 (m)3.49 (m)

D-glucose

Page 35: NMR spectroscopy

Sugar Part 2

Carbon No.

Type of

Carbon

13C Signal δ/ppm

1H signalδ/ppm

1’’’ CH 104.7 4.52(d, 7.6)

2’’’ CH 74.6 3.02 (m)

3’’’ CH 75.9 3.51 (m)

4’’’ CH 69.7 3.09 (m)

5’’’ CH 73.7 3.42 (m)

6’’’ CH2 63.6 3.99 (m)4.13 (m)

Ac Cq CH3

170.320.3

-1.82 (s)

D-glactose

Page 36: NMR spectroscopy

Thank You…