NM USER FORUM 2014 Razvan BUCUROIU Head of Operations Planning 30/01/2014 Free Route and Airspace Improvements
Mar 31, 2015
NM USER FORUM 2014
Razvan BUCUROIUHead of Operations Planning
30/01/2014
Free Route and Airspace Improvements
2
Progress on flight efficiency achievements
Airspace Design – excellent progress – on a good track to achieve 2014 RP1 target Airspace utilisation aspects – decreasing trend, but far from target
Flight planning Enhancements to the RAD, time applicability of the RAD Enhanced utilisation of CDRs Capacity impacts – industrial actions, system failures (0.03-0.04 percentage points lost)
Flight efficiency evolution
Target 2013: +2.85% Target 2013: +4.4%
RTE-DES
3.53% 3.54% 3.45% 3.22% 3.04% 2.96% 2.80%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
RTE-FPL
4.91% 5.03% 4.90% 4.91% 4.73% 4.64% 4.57%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
3
Progress on flight efficiency achievements Flight efficiency evolution 2013
Route Efficiency KPI per AIRAC cycle
20
12
20
10
20
10
20
11
20
13
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
5.0%
5.5%
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
AIRAC
Ro
ute
Ext
ensi
on
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
RTE-DES
RTE-FPL
4
Progress on flight efficiency achievements
RTE-FPL
4.91% 5.03% 4.90% 4.91% 4.73% 4.64% 4.57%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
There is a potential of up to 0.6 percentage points improvement through better flight planning
RP1 Focus on NM Flight Efficiency Initiative
Current situationLast filed FPL
Current network potential
RTE-CDR
4.23% 4.34%
5.06%
4.19% 4.08% 4.04% 3.96%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
5
Second Reference Period 2019 European Targets
•Actual trajectory (KEA)average 2.6% route extension
decreasing from 3.17% in 2012
•Last filed flight plan trajectory (KEP)average 4.1% route extension decreasing from
5.15% in 2012
6
Second Reference Period 2019 NM Targets
•Route extension - airspace design - DESimprovement of the DES indicator
by 0.57 between 2012 and 2019
•NM direct contributions to flight efficiency savingsFE direct savings will amount to
- 10% (2015-2016) - 5% (2017-2019)
•Increase the CDR1/2 usage Increase CDR availability and
usage by 5% between 2012 and 2019
7
ERNIP - ARN Version 2014-2018/19Airspace Vision for RP2
•Comprehensive cross-border implementation of Free Route Airspace in Europe• at least above FL310, in the European airspace•RP1 target expected to be met•Cross border FRA in FABs included in most FABs roadmaps
•Optimised route structure below FL310• ensuring efficient connectivity in/out terminal airspace• supporting PBN implementation
•Simplification of RAD•Very limited RAD in SE and Northern Europe•Moving towards a European RAD
•Harmonised airspace publications;
•More efficient Flexible Use of Airspace procedures and system support
•Closer cooperation NM - airspace users - computer flight plan service providers
8
Implementing the VisionEuropean ATS Route Network
Improvement Plan 2014-2018/19
Route Efficiency KPI per AIRAC cycle
20
12
20
10
20
08
20
13
20
07
20
09
20
11
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
713
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
AIRAC
Ro
ute
Ext
ensi
on
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
RTE-DES
3.65% Jan 2008
3.40% Sept 2009
3.13% Sept 2010
3.05% Sept 2011 2.95%
Sept 2012
approx. 2.35%
end 2019
2.69% Nov 2013
•450 Airspace Improvement Packages
•80 FRA projects
•50 AO airspace packages
•100 Network Manager packages
9
Implementing the VisionFree Route Implementation
10
Implementing the VisionFree Route Implementation
11
Implementing the VisionFree Route Implementation
12
Implementing the VisionFree Route Implementation
13
Implementing the VisionSectorisation
Traffic Demand Variation 2013 vs 2008 4 Weekdays of Traffic
> 80 Ac/day60 to 80 Ac/day40 to 60 Ac/day20 to 40 Ac/day10 to 20 Ac/day
Incr
De
cr
20 to 40 Ac/day40 to 60 Ac/day> 60 Ac/day
10 to 20 Ac/day
Cell size is 20nm x 20nm
Week 25 2013<>2008Traffic Demand Variation 2013 vs 2008 4 Weekdays of Traffic
> 80 Ac/day60 to 80 Ac/day40 to 60 Ac/day20 to 40 Ac/day10 to 20 Ac/day
Incr
De
cr
20 to 40 Ac/day40 to 60 Ac/day> 60 Ac/day
10 to 20 Ac/day
Cell size is 20nm x 20nm
Week 25 2013<>20084 Weekdays of Traffic
> 80 Ac/day60 to 80 Ac/day40 to 60 Ac/day20 to 40 Ac/day10 to 20 Ac/day
Incr
De
cr
20 to 40 Ac/day40 to 60 Ac/day> 60 Ac/day
10 to 20 Ac/day
4 Weekdays of Traffic
> 80 Ac/day60 to 80 Ac/day40 to 60 Ac/day20 to 40 Ac/day10 to 20 Ac/day
Incr
De
cr
20 to 40 Ac/day40 to 60 Ac/day> 60 Ac/day
10 to 20 Ac/day
Cell size is 20nm x 20nm
Week 25 2013<>2008
14
Implementing the VisionSectorisation
Traffic Density Comparison Week <> Weekend
Cell size is 20nm x 20nm
8 Days of Traffic
WE Week
WE <> Week in June 2013Traffic Density Comparison Week <> Weekend
Cell size is 20nm x 20nm
8 Days of Traffic
WE Week
WE <> Week in June 2013
Cell size is 20nm x 20nm
8 Days of Traffic
WE Week
WE <> Week in June 2013
Cell size is 20nm x 20nm
8 Days of Traffic
WE Week
WE <> Week in June 2013
15
Implementing the VisionSectorisation
Flight Level Distribution in ECAC
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Flight Levels
Per
cen
tag
e (
%)
Week 25 - June 2008
Week 25 - June 2013
16
Implementing the VisionCity Pairs
17
Implementing the VisionASM solutions
18
Implementing the VisionRAD Restrictions
•Elimination of further restrictions impacting 15 ANSPs
•Creation of FAB Annexes
•Creation of Network RAD
•Time applicability of the RAD
•No impact on safety and capacity
19
Implementing the VisionTMA Evolutions
•Paris TMA •Barcelona TMA•Baku TMA•Batumi TMA•Beograd TMA•Canarias TMA•Kutaisi TMA•Ljubljana TMA•London TMA (London Airspace Management Program/ LAMP)•Madrid TMA•Milano TMA•Northern Terminal Control Area/ NTCA of Prestwick ACC •Oslo TMA (HOPE - Harmonisation of Oslo Procedures and Environment)•Roma TMA•Vienna TMA
20
•Close cooperation with the airspace users•Coordination started with some individual airlines
•Shortly will be able to provide support to any airline•Ensuring closer coordination on evolutions with the CFPSPs•At network and local level
•Strategic identification of enhanced flight planning options
•Pre-tactical-Tactical-Post Ops•Deploying flight efficiency actions in the NMOC•More effective utilisation of CDRs – ASM solutions•Direct support to AOs
•More awareness at AOs Users Groups
•NM User Forum
Focus on NM Flight Efficiency Initiative
21
Progress on flight efficiency achievements
AIRAC RTE-DES RTE-RAD RTE-CDR RTE-FPL RTE-ATC1308 - Thomas Cook 2.20% 2.82% 2.97% 3.72% 2.94%
1308 - Network 2.78% 3.60% 3.92% 4.48% 3.24%
RP1 Focus on NM Flight Efficiency Initiative
22
Increase airspace availability in SE EuropeAvailability of KFOR Sector as from 3 April 2014