Nitroglycerine, Nitroprusside, or Both in Preventing Nitroglycerine, Nitroprusside, or Both in Preventing Radial Artery Spasm During Transradial Artery Radial Artery Spasm During Transradial Artery Radial Artery Spasm During Transradial Artery Radial Artery Spasm During Transradial Artery Catheterization Catheterization Kintur Sanghvi Cezar Staniloae Sudhesh Srivastava John Coppola Journal of Invasive Cardiology April 2006 ISSN: 1042-3931 - Volume 18 - Issue 4
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Nitroglycerine, Nitroprusside, or Both in Preventing Nitroglycerine, Nitroprusside, or Both in Preventing Radial Artery Spasm During Transradial ArteryRadial Artery Spasm During Transradial ArteryRadial Artery Spasm During Transradial Artery Radial Artery Spasm During Transradial Artery CatheterizationCatheterization
Kintur SanghviCezar StaniloaeSudhesh SrivastavaJohn Coppola
Journal of Invasive CardiologyApril 2006 ISSN: 1042-3931 -Volume 18 - Issue 4
Disclosure
None4/18/2010 11:14:42 AM
SVCMC Cardiology
None
Transradial Intervention
4/18/2010 11:14:42 AM
SVCMC Cardiology
4/18/2010 11:14:42 AM
SVCMC Cardiology
4/18/2010 11:14:42 AM
SVCMC Cardiology
4/18/2010 11:14:42 AM
SVCMC Cardiology
4/18/2010 11:14:42 AM
SVCMC Cardiology
4/18/2010 11:14:42 AM
SVCMC Cardiology
4/18/2010 11:14:42 AM
SVCMC Cardiology
4/18/2010 11:14:42 AM
SVCMC Cardiology
Transradial Intervention
Advantages. Limitations: Technically difficult: Nearly 0% local site complication. Better quality of life for the patients
and the staff.
Access failure. Radial spasm. Loops and tortuosity of Radial and
Reduce cost. Same day discharge. All coronary and peripheral vascular
interventions are possible except for
Subclavian. Longer learning curve
interventions are possible except for few exceptions.
4/18/2010 11:14:42 AM
SVCMC Cardiology
Transradial Intervention
Radial Vs Femoral approach for diagnostic and PCI procedures: Systemic overview and meta-analysis
12 randomized trials n = 3234 (J A C ll C di l 2004 44 349 356 )12 randomized trials n = 3234 (J Am Coll Cardiol 2004 44: 349-356 )
4/18/2010 11:14:42 AM
SVCMC Cardiology
Background
Radial spasm: patient discomfort and failure to complete procedure.
Intra-arterial vasodilator solutions containing a calcium channel blocker and Nitroglycerin have been proven to prevent
t tor treat spasm.
Role of direct Nitric oxide donor is unknown.
4/18/2010 11:14:42 AM
SVCMC Cardiology
Objective
Primary: To compare the efficacy of three different intra-arterial vasodilating cocktails inreducing the incidence of radial artery spasm in patients undergoing transradial coronaryangiogramangiogram.
Secondary: To assess the predictors of arterial spasm in this large group of patients.
4/18/2010 11:14:42 AM
SVCMC Cardiology
Methods
Patients with standard indication for coronary angiogram were enrolled prospectively.
Exclusion
Abnormal Allen’s test Allergy to study drug Previous transradial catheterization. Continuous infusion of any of the study drug except Heparin. Shock
Primary endpointOccurrence of radial artery spasm.
4/18/2010 11:14:42 AM
SVCMC Cardiology
Methods
Randomized to receive one of the three solutions : method of randomization.
Ultrasound of radial artery to measure inner diameter.
Operator was blinded for content of solution and ultrasound results.
Solution A Solution B Solution C
Heparin 2500 U 2500 U 2500 U
Lidocaine 20 mg 20 mg 20 mg
Diltiazem 5 mg 5 mg 5 mg
Nitroglycerine 100 mcg - 100 mcgNitroglycerine 100 mcg - 100 mcg
Nitroprusside - 100 mcg 100 mcg
4/18/2010 11:14:42 AM
SVCMC Cardiology
Methods
Clinical history/ demographics/ height and weight recorded.
Duration of the procedure/ size of catheters/ complications were recorded.
A single experienced operator subjectively determined the presence of spasm.
The spasm was defined as inability to freely manipulate the catheter, difficulty toremove the sheath at the end of the procedure, or presence of fore-arm painexperienced by the patient.experienced by the patient.
4/18/2010 11:14:42 AM
SVCMC Cardiology
Statistical Analysis.
25% improvement in the occurrence of spasm was considered significant. For 80%power “number needed to study” was calculated to be 100pts in each group.Statistical significance was considered for P<0 05Statistical significance was considered for P<0.05
Data were expressed in mean ± standard deviation.
Quantitative variables: the paired t test.
Qualitative variables: the chi square test.Qualitative variables: the chi square test.
Multigroup ANOVA to compare the 3 different groups.
A backward regression multivariate analysis was performed to establish thepredictors of radial artery spasm.
4/18/2010 11:14:42 AM
SVCMC Cardiology
Results Clinical and Procedural variables
4/18/2010 11:14:42 AM
SVCMC Cardiology
Results Occurrence of Spasmp
137140123 119
100
120
P = 0 597
60
80Total PtsSpasm
P = 0.597
15 16 1320
40Spasm
13
0Group A Group B Group C
4/18/2010 11:14:42 AM
SVCMC Cardiology
Conclusion & Discussion
The addition of a direct NO donor to Nitroglycerine, does not reducesthe risk of radial artery spasm.the risk of radial artery spasm.
Use of Nitroglycerine is as effective as the use of Nitroprusside.
Inspite of infusing increasing number of local vasodilators, nosignificant improvement in the incidence of the radial artery spasm.(the concept that certain triggers of arterial spasm cannot be(the concept that certain triggers of arterial spasm cannot becounteracted by the mere use of vasodilators ).
4/18/2010 11:14:42 AM
SVCMC Cardiology
ResultsUnivariate analysis for predictor of spasm y p p
4/18/2010 11:14:42 AM
SVCMC Cardiology
ResultsMultivariate analysis for predictor of spasm y p p
4/18/2010 11:14:42 AM
SVCMC Cardiology
Conclusion & Discussion
Morphometric factors play a significant role in predicting theoccurrence of radial artery spasm.occurrence of radial artery spasm.
The age or sex of the patient, presence of diabetes, BSA andsmoking played no role in prediction of radial spasm as wassmoking played no role in prediction of radial spasm as wassuggested by some other studies.
The relationship between the size of the radial artery the body size The relationship between the size of the radial artery, the body size,and the sheath size is more important in predicting arterial spasm,than each individual component separately.
4/18/2010 11:14:42 AM
SVCMC Cardiology
Limitation
Subjective evaluation of Radial artery spasm.Id l ld b Obj i P ll b k S A iIdeal would be Objective: Pull back, Sonogram, Angiogram
Effect of Sedative / hypnotics was not evaluated.yp
Important in predicting arterial spasm, than each individualcomponent separatelycomponent separately.
4/18/2010 11:14:42 AM
SVCMC Cardiology
Radial Cocktail study II
Multicenter radomization All pateints: Heparine
Radial and Subclavian Angiog
Radial Cocktail (Verapaamil + NTG)
+
Radial Cocktail(Verapaamil + NTG)
N d ti
SedationNo Cocktail
No CocktailNo Sedation.
Sedation No sedation No Cocktail No Sedation.
4/18/2010 11:14:42 AM
SVCMC Cardiology
Thank YouThank You
Related Documents
