1 Ed Harstead, member Fixed Networks CTO Dora van Veen, Vincent Houtsma, Pat Iannone and Peter Vetter, Bell Labs November 2014 Advanced modulation techniques for NG EPON: duobinary
1
Ed Harstead, member Fixed Networks CTODora van Veen, Vincent Houtsma, Pat Iannone and Peter Vetter, Bell LabsNovember 2014
Advanced modulation techniques for NG EPON: duobinary
1. Duobinary modulation tutorial
2. How duobinary could be applied to high speed PONs
3. What are the required device bandwidths and power levels, and how might they be satisfied
4. Duobinary modulation experimental results
5. Mitigating the effects of higher serial speed: chromatic dispersion
Contents
2
5. Mitigating the effects of higher serial speed: chromatic dispersion
6. Mitigating the effects of higher serial speed: electronics
7. Summary
8. References
Duobinary modulation: reduces spectrum by half
NRZ {0,1} + {0,1,2}
Duobinary*: delay and add filter
NRZ OOK
NRZ {0,1}
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
3
T
Duobinary*: low pass filter approximation
NRZ {0,1} {0,1,2}
Frequency
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Time
*These are 3-level “electro” duobinary modulations, not to be confused with optical duobinary
OLTONU
Partitioning duobinary functions in TDM PON
Duobinary {0,1,2}NRZ {0,1} 3-level
decisionNRZ {0,1}
NRZ {0,1} 3-level decision
NRZ {0,1}
Duobinary functions
Transmitter-encoded duobinary
E-O O-E
Required ONU transmitter bandwidth = 40% of NRZ
Duobinary {0,1,2}
4
OLT ONU
NRZ {0,1} 3-level decision
NRZ {0,1}
Receiver-encoded duobinary
E-O O-E
Required ONU transmitter bandwidth = 40% of NRZ
Required ONU receiver bandwidth = 40% of NRZ
Can get 25 Gb/s symmetric transmission with 10 Gb/s components in the ONU!
Can get 40 Gb/s symmetric transmission with 25 Gb/s components in the ONU!
Duobinary {0,1,2}
25 and 40 Gb/s TDM PON optical architecture
TxAPD
DB Rx
Logic
up BMR
Dip
lex
er
Logic
upBM Tx
Dip
lex
er
down downSOA
Bit rate Modulation OLT Tx ONU APD DB Rx
25 Gb/s Receiver- 25 Gb/s 7 GHz (10 Gb/s)
Downstream
OLT ONU
Re-use 10G EPON
SOA
5
Bit rate Modulation OLT BMR ONU BM Tx
10 Gb/s NRZ 10G EPON BMR 10G EPON DML
25 Gb/s Transmitter-encoded
duobinary
12.5 GHz APD Rx 7 GHz Tx (10 Gb/s)
40 Gb/s 20 GHz p-i-n Rx + SOA 11 GHz EML Tx (<25 Gb/s)
Upstream
25 Gb/s Receiver-encoded
duobinary
25 Gb/s 7 GHz (10 Gb/s)
40 Gb/s 40 Gb/s 11 GHz (<25 Gb/s)
25 Gb/s NRZ upstream might also be possible, for future study
Technology exists
Piggyback on 40GBASE-FR, etc.
Piggyback on 100GBASE-ER4
10 Gb/s components
25 Gb/s down 40 Gb/s down 25 Gb/s up 40 Gb/s up*
10GBASE-PR(X) EPON Rx sensitivity -29.5 dBm (U4) -29 dBm (D4)
Changes to account for high speed transmission
Sustain SNR #1: 2-level � 3-level +3 dB
Sustain SNR #2: wider receiver bandwidth 0 dB 2 dB 2.5 dB 4.5 dB
Penalty: suboptimal duobinary encoding +1.5 dB
Factor in improved LDPC FEC coding gain - 1 dB 0 dB
Projected Rx sensitivity (b-to-b) -26 dBm -24 dBm -22 dBm -20 dBm
Optical path penalty (20 km, incl. 1 dB CD penalty)
+1.5 dB
Estimated TDM PON OLT launch power requirements.
6
(20 km, incl. 1 dB CD penalty)
Required minimum launch powers OLT ONU
PR-10 loss budget +20 dB -4.5 dBm -2.5 dBm -0.5 dBm 1.5 dBm
PR-20 loss budget +24 dB -0.5 dBm 1.5 dBm 3.5 dBm 5.5 dBm
PR-30 loss budget +29 dB 4.5 dBm 6.5 dBm 8.5 dBm 10.5 dBm
PR-40 loss budget +33 dB 8.5 dBm 10.5 dBm 12.5 dBm 14.5 dBm
Within capability of commercial DMLs/EMLs
Within capability of commercial SOAs
*we assume p-i-n + SOA sensitivity equivalent to APD a combination of DML and/or TEC might eliminate need for SOA
26 Gb/s experiment using standard 10 Gb/s APDDownstream receiver-encoded duobinary
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
Rel
ativ
e R
espo
nse
[dB
]
20151050Frequency [GHz]
APD+TIA BW=7.4 GHz
= Measured APD+TIA Response = Calculated Delay and Add filter
Transmitted NRZ-OOK eye
7
D. van Veen, V. E. Houtsma, P. Winzer, and P. Vetter (Bell Labs), "26-Gbps PON Transmission over 40-km using Duobinary Detectionwith a Low Cost 7-GHz APD-Based Receiver," ECOC OSA Technical Digest
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10-L
og10
(Bit
Err
or R
ate)
[-]
-26 -24 -22 -20 -18 -16Received Optical Power [dBm]
Bit Error Rata @ 26 Gb/s
PRBS length=215
-1λ=1314 nm
40 km fiber with booster SOA back-to-back with booster SOA back-to-back measurement
Received duobinary eye (with decision threshold levels indicated)
40 Gb/s experiment using commercial 25 Gb/s APDDownstream receiver-encoded duobinary
8
V. Houtsma, D. van Veen, A. Gnauck and P. Iannone (Bell Labs), "APD-Based DuoBinary Direct Detection Receivers for 40 Gbps TDM-PON”, 2014, unpublished
1 dB penalty at 130 ps/nm
High speed transmission: Chromatic Dispersion
Duobinary improves CD tolerance by ~2x vs. NRZ
Estimated usable SSMF spectrum (20 km) without DC
40 Gb/s DB EML
25 Gb/s DB EML
25 Gb/s DB DML
10 Gb/s NRZ EML
10 Gb/s NRZ DML
9
O-band
• If the O-band is available,
– no dispersion compensation (DC) is required up to 40 Gb/s (EML).
– Up to 25 Gb/s can use DML
• If the O-band is not available,
– 10 Gb/s: can use DML and no DC
– 25 Gb/s: can use EML and no DC
– Only 40 Gb/s will require DC
• DC fiber is low-loss (<3 dB) and low cost, although bulky
• FBG DCMs are smaller and a potential alternative
• EDC for duobinary (esp. burst mode) requires more study
1260 1310 1360 1410 1460 1510 1560 1610
G.652 spectrum (nm)
ONU Tx Max Tx range Co-existence with
10G/25G DML 20 nm
10G EPON
10G/25G/40G
10G EPON + GPON/1G EPON*
ONU Tx Max Tx range Co-existence with
10G/25G DML 20 nm
10G EPON
10G/25G/40G
10G EPON + GPON/1G EPON*
ONU Tx Max Tx range Co-existence with
10G/25G DML 20 nm
10G EPON
Possible O-band co-existence scenarios
10G EPONupstream
NG EPONdown
NG EPONupstream
GPON/1G EPON*10G EPON
NG EPON
1260 1270 1280 1290 1300 1310 1320 1330 1340 1350 1360
NG EPONdown
stream
10
10G/25G/40G EML
5 nm10G/25G/40G
EML 5 nm
10G/25G DML 20 nm
10G EPON + GPON/1G EPON* (shared OLT BMR and MAC)
*DFB laser typical
EPONdown
stream
GPON/1G EPON*upstream
10G EPONupstream
EPONup
stream
O-band
GPON/1G EPON*upstream
10G EPON NG EPONupstream
NG EPONdown
stream
1260 1270 1280 1290 1300 1310 1320 1330 1340 1350 1360
1260 1270 1280 1290 1300 1310 1320 1330 1340 1350 1360
High speed transmission: reducing impact on ONU silicon and power consumption
• Downstream bit interleaving (BI) allows low cost ONU silicon to operate at user rates.
• Can be a simple static BI or dynamic BI
– Example of simple static BI: 40 Gb/s 4:1 BI, analogous to TWDM wavelength stacking, allows the ONU to operate at 10 Gb/s (after the decimator).
10 Gb/s
10G EPON logic10 Gb/s
EPON BMR10 Gb/s
EPON DML Tx
OLT ONU
11
CDR
40 Gb/s NRZ
3-level detect
40 Gb/s DB
10 Gb/s NRZ
10G EPON logic
APD/ TIA
Example of a 40/10 NG EPON using static 4:1 bit interleaving
EML/ Tx
Static 4:1
decimator
10 Gb/s NRZ
40 Gb/s NRZ
40 Gb/s DD duobinary receiver
– Dynamic bit interleaving: where the aggregate TDM PON bandwidth can be 100% flexibly allocated across the ONUs
Static 4:1 BI+
10G EPON logic
10G EPON logic
10G EPON logic
10G EPON logic
ONU components summary
PON flavor
Laser
APDO-band available
O-band not available
25/10 10 Gb/s DML10 Gb/s APD
25/25 10 Gb/s DML 10 Gb/s EML
Can be satisfied by:
25 Gb/s components
10 Gb/s components
40/10 10 Gb/s DML
12
• 100GBASE-ER4 25 Gb/s APDs will use the same materials, manufacturing processes, and packaging technologies as today’s low cost 10 Gb/s receivers
• Therefore, the incremental variable cost will be driven by testing at higher speed and lower yield. This premium should become small over time.
components25 Gb/s APD40/25 10 Gb/s DML 10 Gb/s EML
40/40 25 Gb/s EML
TDM PON historical trend
100
1000
10000
100000
Mb
/s
Evolution of TDM PON downstream rate
100
1000
10000
100000
Mb
/s
Evolution of TDM PON downstream rate
40G EPON in 2016?PON type Commercial Deployment Year
Line rate (Mb/s)
Down Up
Narrowband Deutsche Telekom OPAL 1995 29 29
Narrowband NTT Pi PON 1997 49 49
ATM PON NTT 2001 155 155
BPON NTT West 2003 622 155
EPON NTT East 2004 1000 1000
GPON Verizon FiOS 2007 2488 1244
13
101990 2000 2010 2020
Commercial deployments
101990 2000 2010 2020
Commercial deployments Trend: 2-year doubling
At each step, TDM PON has overcome 3 main challenges without the aid of WDM
– Higher speed optics and electronics
– More optical power/receiver sensitivity to sustain SNR
– Narrower linewidth lasers to combat chromatic dispersion
Can this be repeated for 25 Gb/s? or 40 Gb/s?
GPON Verizon FiOS 2007 2488 1244
10G EPON China Telecom 2012 10000 1000
Summary
• Duobinary modulation is a tool in a tool box that can be used to achieve higher bit rates from lower speed components
• Although we have performed simulations and experiments, more study is required, especially for the upstream:
– Transmitter-encoded duobinary modulation
– Duobinary modulation and burst mode transmission
14
– Duobinary modulation and burst mode transmission
– Burst mode duobinary EDC
FSAN, “Forty gigabit time division multiplexed PON (XLG-PON)”, section 6.2 in “Next-generation 2 access network technology” white paper, 2012 (unpublished)
D. van Veen, D. Suvakovic, H. Chow, V. Houtsma, E. Harstead, P. J. Winzer, and P. Vetter, "Options for TDM PON beyond 10G," in Advanced Photonics Congress, OSA Technical Digest (online) (Optical Society of America, 2012), paper AW2A.1.
D. Suvakovic, H. Chow, D. van Veen, J. Galaro, B. Farah, N. P. Anthapadmanabhan and P. Vetter, “Low Energy Bit-Interleaving Downstream Protocol for Passive Optical Networks”, 2012 IEEE Online Conference on Green Communications (GreenCom), p.26-p31 (2012).
D. van Veen, V. E. Houtsma, P. Winzer and P. Vetter, "26-Gbps PON Transmission over 40-km using Duobinary Detection with a Low Cost 7-GHz APD-Based Receiver," in European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communication, OSA Technical Digest (online) (Optical Society of America, 2012), paper Tu.3.B.1.
PON duobinary references
15
D. van Veen, V. Houtsma, A. Gnauck, P. Iannone, “40-Gb/s TDM-PON over 42 km with 64-way Power Split using a Binary Direct Detection Receiver”, in European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communication, 2014
Delay-and-add filter and low-pass filter approximation
Calculated delay-and-add filter and ideal low-pass filter approximation
17
Calculated delay-and-add filter and measured APD/TIA responses