Top Banner
NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John Hubbert Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John Hubbert National Center for Atmospheric Research National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, CO Boulder, CO
44

NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Dec 16, 2015

Download

Documents

Bryan Kimpton
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

NEXRAD TAC

Norman, OK

March 21-22, 2006

Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) systemStatus and Demonstration Studies

Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John HubbertMike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John HubbertNational Center for Atmospheric ResearchNational Center for Atmospheric Research

Boulder, COBoulder, CO

Page 2: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Motivation

• Currently: Only Detect AP clutter in RPG– No “correction” only censoring of data

• Future: New fast radar processors (e.g. RVP8) which make possible:

– Spectral processing with FFTs, etc– Spectral clutter filters instead of time domain filters. Simply calculate the

spectrum and “notch out” zero and near zero velocity points

Real time detection and

correction of AP clutter

Mitigation of AP Clutter without weather attenuationMitigation of AP Clutter without weather attenuation

Page 3: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Clutter and Weather Clutter and Weather SpectraSpectra

Clutter and weather separated Clutter and and weather not separated

Clutter and narrow width weather are indistinguishable.Clutter and narrow width weather are indistinguishable.Must us spatial variance parameters to distinguish.Must us spatial variance parameters to distinguish.

Page 4: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

AP Detection and CorrectionAP Detection and Correctionin ORDAin ORDA

ORDAORDA

IQ DataIQ DataUncorrectedUncorrectedMomentsMoments

SpectralSpectralFeaturesFeatures

Corrected Moments to ORPGCorrected Moments to ORPG

Clutter ControlClutter Control

CMDCMDClutter Mitigation Decision

Calculate Moments

buffer

Objective: Real time AP clutter detection Real time AP clutter detection AND correctionAND correction

Clutter filter

Page 5: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

CMD Input Variables• Uses the following fields:

• TDBZ - DBZ texture: squared change in dBZ from one gate to the next, in

range, averaged over the kernel.

• SPIN - DBZ ‘spin’: measure of how frequently the trend in reflectivity along a

beam changes with range. Averaged over the kernel.

• Spectral Domain parameters:

– Clutter ratio narrow

– Clutter ratio wide

– TDBZ_0 Texture of power close to 0 m/s (under development)

– SPIN_0 SPIN of power close to 0 m/s (under development)

– NSPA NEXRAD Spectral Processing Algorithm (under development)

Page 6: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Definition of Clutter Ratio Narrow

RatioNarrow = Power in A / (Power in B + Power in C), expressed in dB

Page 7: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Definition of Clutter Ratio Wide

RatioWide = Power in A / (Power in B + Power in C), expressed in dB

Page 8: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

CMD Methodology and an Example• CMD will automate GMAP application in AP conditions

– Fuzzy logic used to discriminate AP clutter from precipitation– GMAP applied only to gates with AP clutter

• Precipitation is not filtered and, therefore, is not biased • Example: KJIM squall line (assume NP clutter is AP clutter)

Reflectivity – No GMAP Velocity – No GMAP

NP Clutter

Precipitation w/ velocitiesnear 0 m/s

Clutter Flag determined by CMD

Page 9: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

CMD Specifies Where GMAP is Applied

• Clutter flag specifies GMAP application• Near-zero precipitation return is not clutter filtered and no bias is introduced• NP clutter is removed and underlying signal recovered

Reflectivity – CMD turns GMAP on/off Velocity – CMD turns GMAP on/off

Page 10: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

What if GMAP is Applied Everywhere?• Example shown for comparison purposes only

– Shows the bias that is introduced when precipitation is clutter filtered• CMD will automate the clutter filter application decision and remove the human from this decision loop

– Result: improved moment estimates

Reflectivity – GMAP applied at all gates Velocity – GMAP applied at all gates

Page 11: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Clutter with Zero Clutter with Zero Velocity Velocity

PrecipitationPrecipitation

Colorado Front Range Snow StormColorado Front Range Snow Storm

RVP8 in S-PolRVP8 in S-Pol2006/03/082006/03/08

Page 12: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

S-Pol Clutter MapS-Pol Clutter Map elev. 1.0 deg., to 70km range elev. 1.0 deg., to 70km range

Mountains to the west of the radar, plains with ridges to the eastMountains to the west of the radar, plains with ridges to the east

Page 13: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Snow ExampleSnow Example

Winds: south-east to north-west.Winds: south-east to north-west.Temperature at the surface around freezingTemperature at the surface around freezing

Reflectivity VelocityElev. 1.0 deg.

Page 14: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Spectrum widthSpectrum widthBoth clutter and weather regions have narrow spectra,making clutter filtering difficult

Page 15: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Snow band reflectivity againSnow band reflectivity again

Page 16: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Notch Filter versus Adaptive FilterNotch Filter versus Adaptive FilterPower is removed from weather echoes.

Notch Adaptive

Page 17: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

CMD Clutter Flag FieldCMD Clutter Flag FieldThe clutter filter is only applied at the points flagged in this way

Page 18: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Clutter reflectivity againClutter reflectivity again

Page 19: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Reflectivity field againReflectivity field again

Page 20: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Filtered reflectivityFiltered reflectivityReflectivity after application of adaptive filter at points flagged ashaving clutter. Some small “problem” regions– still needs investigation.

Page 21: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Applying adaptive filter Applying adaptive filter everywhereeverywhere

Not much difference from notch in the areas where velocityIs close to 0.

Page 22: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Reflectivity againReflectivity again

Page 23: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Velocity againVelocity again

Page 24: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Velocity after applying Velocity after applying clutter filter everywhereclutter filter everywhere

Page 25: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

CMD filtered velocityCMD filtered velocityNote the preservation of the zero velocity weather data

Page 26: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Issues / Future workIssues / Future work

Identify “failure” regions and Identify “failure” regions and determine cause.determine cause.

Adding additional spectral features.Adding additional spectral features. Gathering and testing of further data Gathering and testing of further data

sets.sets.

Thank youThank you

Page 27: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Thank YouThank You

See:See: http://www.http://www.atdatd..ucarucar..edu/rsf/NEXRAD/indexedu/rsf/NEXRAD/index.html.html

for publication and presentation for publication and presentation downloads & further info.downloads & further info.

Page 28: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Spectra versus Range

Clutter

WeatherSecond trip

Third trip

“Clear air”

Point scatterers

Clutter “leakage”

Page 29: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Example – SPOL AP caseExample – SPOL AP case

AP case2006/03/09

Case of anomalous propagation on the morning after theprevious snow storm case.

Page 30: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Clear-day clutter reflectivity Clear-day clutter reflectivity at 1.5 degreesat 1.5 degrees

Page 31: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

AP reflectivity at 1.5 AP reflectivity at 1.5 degreesdegrees

This case has usual NP, plus AP within 60 km andWeather echoes to the NE and SE beyond 60 km.

Page 32: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Radial velocity for AP caseRadial velocity for AP case

Page 33: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Filtered radial velocity for Filtered radial velocity for AP caseAP case

Page 34: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Example – SPOL Dual-pol Example – SPOL Dual-pol casecase

Dual polarization case2006/03/10

For this case, SPOL was run in alternating pulse mode.

There is weather echo to the north and south of the radar.

Some dual polarization fields are added to the CMD toenhance the accuracy of the clutter detection.

Page 35: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Clear-day clutter at 1.5 Clear-day clutter at 1.5 degrees againdegrees again

Page 36: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Reflectivity field – dual pol Reflectivity field – dual pol casecase

There is clutter to the east of the radar, and weather and cluttercombined to the north and south of the radar.

There also appears to be some minor AP mixed with the NP clutter.

Page 37: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

SDEV of RhoHV feature fieldSDEV of RhoHV feature fieldFeature field computed as the standard deviation of RhoHV.Lower values (gray) indicate weather echo.

Page 38: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

SDEV of ZDR feature fieldSDEV of ZDR feature fieldFeature field computed as the standard deviation of ZDR.Lower values (gray) indicate weather echo.

Higher values (reds) suggest clutter regions.

Page 39: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Dual polarization CMD Dual polarization CMD combined interest fieldcombined interest field

Page 40: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Dual polarization CMD Dual polarization CMD clutter decision flagclutter decision flag

Page 41: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Unfiltered dual-pol Unfiltered dual-pol reflectivity againreflectivity again

Page 42: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Filtered dual-pol reflectivityFiltered dual-pol reflectivity

Page 43: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Unfiltered dual-pol velocityUnfiltered dual-pol velocityFolding is due to creating spectra using every second pulse, so that spectra are not affected by differences in H/V paths. This was done for simplicity, and is only a temporary solution.

This problem would not occur with simultaneous HV transmission.

Page 44: NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.

Filtered dual-pol velocityFiltered dual-pol velocity