New York City PBIS Technical Assistance Center Update: Adaptation, Alignment, and Integration National PBIS Leadership Forum Satish Moorthy, NYC PBIS Chicago: October, 2011
Dec 14, 2015
New York City PBIS Technical Assistance Center Update:
Adaptation, Alignment, and Integration
National PBIS Leadership ForumSatish Moorthy, NYC PBISChicago: October, 2011
NYC PBIS Big Ideas for Today
• Learn about our Progress and Expansion
• Learn about our Integrative Implementation Demonstrations
• Systems alignment: A Global Perspective on Implementation (Federal, State, City)
The Big Picture in the Big Apple
• 9 years of PBIS in New York City • >200 schools trained (12.5% of NYC public schools)• Training at all 3 Tiers of PBIS• Success in Implementation of PBIS is dependent on
INTEGRATION with District and School-based Policies and Initiatives.
• Focus for 2011: Capacity building in Districts/Networks
Big 5 PBIS “Commitments” for Student Achievement (at school, city, state levels)
• Commitment to Coordinated (Cross-Functional) Teams
• Commitment to Capacity-Building• Commitment to Sustainability• Commitment to Policy Alignment and
Coherence (INTEGRATION)• Commitment to Ongoing Progress
Monitoring (FIDELITY)
School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS)
• Build a continuum of supports that begins with the whole school and extends to intensive, wraparound support for individual students and their families.
Tier 3/Tertiary Interventions 1-5%• Individual students• Assessment-based• High intensity
1-5% Tier 3/Tertiary Interventions• Individual students• Assessment-based• Intense, durable procedures
Tier 2/Secondary Interventions 5-15%• Some students (at-risk)• High efficiency• Rapid response• Small group interventions• Some individualizing
5-15% Tier 2/Secondary Interventions• Some students (at-risk)• High efficiency• Rapid response• Small group interventions• Some individualizing
Tier 1/Universal Interventions 80-90%• All students• Preventive, proactive
80-90% Tier 1/Universal Interventions• All settings, all students• Preventive, proactive
School-Wide Systems for Student Success:A Response to Intervention (RtI) Model
Academic Systems Behavioral Systems
Illinois PBIS Network, Revised May 15, 2008. Adapted from “What is school-wide PBS?” OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. Accessed at http://pbis.org/schoolwide.htm
Schools adopting SWPBIS by year
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 2010 20110
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
14,325 Schools Adopting
School-wide PBIS
Schools adopting SWPBIS (Feb, 2011)Al
abam
a
Alas
ka
Ariz
ona
Arka
nsas
Calif
orni
a
Colo
rado
*
Conn
ectic
ut
Del
awar
e
Flor
ida*
Geo
rgia
Haw
aii
Idah
o
Illin
ois
Indi
ana
Iow
a*
Kans
as*
Kent
ucky
Loui
sian
a*
Mai
ne
Mar
ylan
d*
Mas
sach
usett
s
Mic
higa
n
Min
neso
ta
Mis
siss
ippi
Mis
sour
i*
Mon
tana
*
Neb
rask
a
Nev
ada
New
Ham
pshi
re
New
Jers
ey*
New
Mex
ico
New
Yor
k
Nor
th C
arol
ina*
Nor
th D
akot
a*
Ohi
o
Okl
ahom
a
Ore
gon*
Penn
sylv
ania
Rhod
e Is
land
Sout
h Ca
rolin
a*
Sout
h D
akot
a
Tenn
esse
e
Texa
s
Uta
h*
Verm
ont
Virg
inia
Was
hing
ton
Stat
e
Was
hing
ton
DC
Wes
t Vir
gini
a
Wis
cons
in
Wyo
min
g
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
160011 states with over 500 schools3 states with over 1000 schoolsNYC at 200 schools (19th overall)
Illinois
Florida TexasMaryland
New York
NYC
PBIS Schools by Type and Year: New York CitySchools Trained: Cumulative by year
02-03Yr 1
03-04Yr 2
04-05Yr 3
05-06Yr 4
06-07Yr 5
07-08Yr 6
08-09Yr 7
09-10Yr 8
10-11Yr 9
ES 2 7 27 35 39 45 62 75 106
K-8 9 9 11 18 18 18 21
K-12 11 7 4 4 4 4 4
MS/JRH
2 1 16 25 34 46 47 53 77
MS/HS 1 1 2 3 6 5 5
HS 9 6 7 4 10 14 24 41
Alternative
29 29 35
NYC Total
5 17 70 84 94 126 154 211 289
New York City-PBIS SchoolsRegional Expansion / SustainabilityNumber Schools Trained and Active
Cumulative
94126
154
211
289
79111
140
180
241
2 2 5 5 9 14 22 22305 17
70 847557
1750
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Yr1
Yr2
Yr3
Yr4
Yr5
Yr6
Yr7
Yr8
Yr9
Trained Active Coaches
• Yr 1: 2002-2003• Yr 2: 2003-2004• Yr 3: 2004-2005• Yr 4: 2005-2006• Yr 5: 2006-2007• Yr 6: 2007-2008• Yr 7: 2008-2009• Yr 8: 2009-2010• Yr 7: 2010-2011
NYC PBIS Schools by Borough
Manhattan: 28 Bronx: 105
Brooklyn: 81
Queens: 58
Staten Island: 17
What is School-wide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports?
• School-wide PBIS is:
–A systems framework for establishing the social culture and behavioral supports needed for a school to be an effective learning environment for ALL STUDENTS.
Urban Challenges for PBIS• Poverty and Health
• Disproportional Rates of Suspensions of SWD by Race/Ethnicity
• How do we move from reactive approaches to the “problem”, to preventative (e.g., culturally responsive)
• How can we prevent? How do we include diverse communities, within school and in our neighborhoods?
The Urban Context
• NYC Population: 8,214,426 (Census Est. 2006) (42.5% of total NY State population)
• Urban Population Density (2006):
– NYC: 26,402 per sq. mile – Chicago: 12,750 per sq. mile– Los Angeles: 7,877 per sq. mile
The Context: New York City
• 9.5% Unemployment Rate 2009 (from 4.5% in May ‘08) (nyc.gov)
• 35.9% of residents foreign born (2000 Census)• 47.6% language other than English spoken at
home (2000 Census)• Estimated 170 languages spoken
NYC by Ethnicity (2000 Census)
• Population: 8,214,426 (Census Est. 2006)
• 35.1% White• 27.0% Hispanic/ Latino• 24.5% African American• 9.8% Asian
Under 18: % Poverty and % Uninsured –NYC
39.4
30.9 29.9
16.8 15.914.8 14.39.1
13.3
6.8
05
1015202530354045
Bro
nx
Bro
okly
n
Man
hat
tan
Que
ens
Sta
ten
Isla
nd
% Poverty (2005)
% Uninsured (2000)
U.S. <18Poverty Rate 18.5%
U.S. <18Uninsured Rate 11.9%
NYC Public Schools: Quick Facts
• Key Facts:
1.1 million students1,600+ schools335 new schools since 2002 80,000 teachers$21 billion annual budget
• Source: schools.nyc.gov
NYC Schools Ethnic Demographics
• 1.1 million students
• 39.4% Hispanic
• 32.8% African-American
• 14.3% White
• 13.6% Asian/ Pacific Islander
• 4% Native American
Student Demographics
• Students Receiving DOE Special Education Services (includes all public, non-public, pre-school & school age): 161,820
• English Language Learners: 146,132
• Students Eligible for Free/Reduced Lunch: 784,963 (76.3%)
Scaling Up ChallengesCompeting Demands on Educators,
Administrators, Districts– Improving Low-Performing Schools– Providing Free and Appropriate Public Education
(FAPE) in the Least Restrictive Environment,– Safe and Supportive Schools,– Supporting Systems of Care for At-Risk Students– Disproportionality in SpEd and Suspensions
(African American Students)
Four Areas for NYC PBIS Integration
1) Response to Intervention and Universal Design for Learning (FAPE and Common Core) IDEA
2) Systems of Care and Wraparound Social Services – Safe and Drug Free Schools
3) Culturally Responsive Positive Behavioral Support Systems – Civil Rights Act
4) Bully Prevention and Safe Schools – ESEA, Safe and Drug Free Schools
Integrative PBIS Domain #1
• 1) Response to Intervention and Universal Design for Learning (FAPE and Common Core, FBA-BIP and MDR)
Percent of students, ages 6 through 21, receiving special education services outside the regular class setting more than 60 percent of the school day.
IDEA Part BComparison of State Level LRE Data
(DAC- IDEA Data, 2008)
State % Students in MRE Settings
Vermont0
Puerto Rico5.84
North Dakota8.33
Alabama9.41
South Dakota10.5
West Virginia10.5
Oklahoma11.36
Nebraska11.37
Wyoming11.44
Idaho11.76
Kansas12.02
Iowa12.66
Kentucky12.88
Texas13.66
Oregon13.7
Montana13.79
Colorado13.81
Connecticut14.1
Wisconsin14.33
Minnesota14.55
Nevada15
Pennsylvania15.39
Mississippi15.47
Tennessee15.6
Alaska15.63
Missouri15.68
Washington15.73
Maine16.25
Arkansas16.8
North Carolina18.04
Arizona18.26
Indiana18.93
Georgia19.04
Louisiana19.11
Utah19.21
Ohio19.63
Virginia20.91
Michigan21.3
New Mexico21.53
Rhode Island21.97
Florida22.06
Massachusetts22.62
South Carolina22.84
Delaware23.3
Maryland23.99
Illinois 25.5California
27.78Hawaii
28.93New Jersey
29.19New Hampshire
30.26New York
32.46District of Columbia
51.96
48. Hawaii 28.93 49. New Jersey 29.19 50. New Hampshire 30.26 51. New York
32.46 52. District of Columbia 51.96
State Performance Plan Indicator 5: Least Restrictive Environment – School Age
This definition includes students with disabilities in public schools, separate alternative schools, residential facilities. parentally placed in private schools, correctional facilities, and home or hospital environments.
Universal Design
• Developed into…• Ramps and curb cuts• Automatic door-opening devices• Accessible toilets• Fire alarm systems with lights• Closed-captioning• Texting
26
Origins in Architecture
Division of Students with Disabilities and English Language Learners (DSWDELL)
NYC Special Education Reform 2010-12
• Four Components•Academics & Instructional Supports: e.g., ELA, Math, Social Studies, Science, Arts,
•Social, Emotional and Behavioral Development: e.g., Classroom Management Strategies, School-Wide Systems, Individual Interventions
•School Operations: e.g., Scheduling, Staffing, Budget & Funding, Data Systems, Compliance
•Long Term Planning: e.g., Transition Planning, Graduation Planning, Articulation Planning
Timeline for PBIS and Special Ed Reform
• Phase 1 Response to Intervention Pilot for 25 schools.
• 10 School Support Networks and 250 schools participating in Phase 1 (2010-2012).
• All 60 School Support Networks and 1700 schools will be participating in 2012-13.
Integrative PBIS Domain #2
• 2) Systems of Care – New York Promise Zones
Integrating PBISPromise Zones for Urban Education
• Systems of Care Pilot funded by NY State Office of Mental Health
• Endorsed by State Commissioners of all child-serving agencies
• Key features:– An External Change Partner– The School Support Team and Social Worker– A Community Services Support Network
“Could someone help me with these? I’m late for math class.”
PBIS and Systems of Care
– School-wide PBIS as a foundation (5 high-needs schools in the Bronx)
– Community Mental Health Partner (State funded)
– Capacity-building for Tier 3 team (Pupil Personnel Team)
– Connecting to community-based agencies and supports for at-risk youth and families
NYC Promise Zone for Urban Education “'It is today we must create the world of the future.' Eleanor Roosevelt
'If we always do what we've always done, we will get what we've always got.' Adam Urbanski
2010-2011
School Year
Oversight of State Agency Office of Mental Health, DOE, Office of School
Health Promise Zone Objectives:
Increase Positive Student Engagement Improve academics, attendance, indicators
to increase instructional time Reduce absenteeism, truancy and incidents
resulting in discipline Identify a replicable model
PBIS External “Change Agent”
Team based, comprehensive, and proactive system for facilitating, and maintaining student success.
Targets multiple systems in a school:
School-wide systems Classroom systems Non-classroom systems Individual systems
Children First Network Structure (CFN)
Review & Analyze school data Liaison between principals Support schools needs
Community Services & Supports
Social Services
Department of Labor
Chemical Dependency
Mental Health
Health
Promise Zone Support Matrix: From Client to Community
Instructional Support Teams: School improvement tool designed to improve instruction through increased professionalism collaboration, problem solving, reflection, and support among school personnel. Student Support Team: The schools primary intervention team for students with academic, behavior, and or social-emotional concerns. A multi-disciplinary team collaboratively develops, implements and monitors student interventions
School Social Worker/Family Advocate: The role and function differs from school based social workers in that there is not a treatment focus on children in special education, but rather prevention & intervention focus for the entire school population. SSW facilitates, skill groups brief situational therapy & home visits. SSW responds to concerns by teachers or administrators regarding “daily issues of crisis” and then makes necessary referrals.
Systems of Care Evaluation
• Process and/or Implementation Evaluation– Replicability of model for collaborative planning
and service delivery
• Student Outcome Evaluation– Increased Positive Engagement in the Instructional
Process
Evaluation Timelines
• January- June 2011 – BASELINE for both Process and Outcomes
• September 2011 - June 2012– Ongoing Data Collection
Integrative PBIS Domain #3
• 3) Safe and Supportive Schools - Bully Prevention
Safe and Supportive Schools Integration
»In 2010:
SW-PBIS is now Recommended Discipline
Policy in NYC!!!
Reducing School Violence and Suspensions 2007-2009
• Of 14 NYC PBIS schools cited as Persistently Dangerous by the State:– 11 showed increases in attendance– 12 showed decreases in violent incidents– 9 showed significant decreases in total suspensions– 12 were removed from the Persistently Dangerous List
• Of 16 cited in 2008 by the State for Disproportional Rates of Suspensions of Students with Disabilities (SPP #4) that have been in NYS PBIS for more than a year:
– 14 (or 88%) saw either significant reductions in suspensions (9) or no increase (5)
PBIS/ School Safety Implementation
• Training Youth Development Staff (in charge of Safety and Suspensions) in PBIS
• Half-Day Modules:– Basic Principles of ABA/ Behavior– Competing Behavior Pathway– School-wide PBIS
• Youth Development Staff attend PBIS along with school-based teams
Integrative PBIS Domain #4
• 4) Culturally Responsive PBIS Systems–Addressing Disproportionality in Suspensions (SPP 4B)
Addressing Disproportionality
Focus: Disproportional Rates of Long-Term Suspensions (>10 days) of Black or African-American Students with Disabilities, where Black and African American Students are more than 2 times as likely to be suspended than other students with IEPs
Action: PBIS has been identified as a recommended
approach to address disproportionality
Digging Deeper
• Deeper analysis shows 91 schools with the highest disproportionality– Where risk of suspension of Black or African
American student with disabilities is more the 2 times as likely as that of all other students with disabilities
– 2.0 Relative Risk threshold is set by the State (shows over 330 schools)
PBIS/ Culturally Responsive Integration 2010-12
• Collaboration with New York University TAC for Disproportionality
– 2 Levels of Intervention (Culturally Responsive Schools)
• School-Based (8 schools in pilot)
• Leadership training and capacity building
11 PBIS Schools with the highest rates of Disproportionality in Rates of Long-term Suspensions by Race/Ethnicity SPPI 4B
Comparison of 2009-10 to 2010-11Suspensions
Reduction 81.8%Increase 18.2%
Initial Referrals Reduction 45.5%No change 18.2%Increase 36.4%
AttendanceIncrease 90.9%Reduction 9.1%
N=11
81.8%
18.2%
Reduction IncreaseNo Change
45.5%
36.4%
18.2%
ReductionIncrease No change
9.1%
90.9%
Reduction Increase No Change
Comparison within 91 NYC Schools with the highest levels of Disproportionality in Suspensions of
Students with Disabilities
N=11
SuspensionsPercent of PBIS Schools Percent of Non-PBIS Schools
58.8%
40.0%
1.3%
ReductionIncreaseNo Change
Initial Referrals
N=80
81.8%
18.2%
Reduction IncreaseNo Change
45.5%
36.4%
18.2%
ReductionIncrease No change
37.5%
50.0%
12.5%
ReductionIncreaseNo Change
Systems Alignment: A Global Perspective on PBIS Implementation
NYC PBIS Technical Assistance Center
Funding VisibilityPolitical Support
Training Coaching Evaluation
Active Coordination with Children First Networks
Local School Teams/Demonstrations
Alignment Policy
PBIS Implementation Logic
Behavioral Expertise
RSE-TASC
PBISPBIS DSWDELL D75
Statewide PBIS TAC
National PBIS TAC
PBIS Schools
Systems Change
NY State Education
NYC DOE
Schools
Teachers/ Staff
Effective Practices
AL
IGN
ME
NTFederal
Departments
Imp
lem
enta
tio
n T
eam
s
FORM FOLLOWS FUNCTION
RSE-TASC
PBISPBIS DSWDELL D75
Statewide PBIS TAC
National PBIS TAC
PBIS Schools
NYC PBIS Coordination• NYC PBIS provides:(1) research-based professional development for
school-based teams (all 3 tiers including FBA-BIP),
(2) technical support and implementation assistance, and
(3) training on data collection and progress monitoring of PBIS practices.
(4) internal and External Coach Networking
CFNs
NYC DOE PBIS
Schools Schools SchoolsSchools
Cluster Cluster Cluster Cluster Cluster District 75
CFNs CFNs CFNs CFNs CFNs
SchoolsSchools
Schools
SchoolsSchools
Schools
Schools
SchoolsSchoolsSchools
SchoolsSchools
Schools
SchoolsSchools
Schools
SchoolsSchools
Schools
SchoolsSchools
Schools
Schools
SchoolsSchools
Schools
Schools
Schools
Schools
Schools
Schools
Schools
Schools
Schools
Schools
NYC PBIS External TA Coach Funding Trends 2009-2012
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2008 2009 2010 2011 Proj
Centrally Funded
Locally Funded
Central Funding: Tax Levy, IDEA, Race to the Top
Local Funding: Tax Levy, IDEA, Race to the Top
SYST
EMS
PRACTICES
DATASupportingStaff Behavior
SupportingDecisionMaking
SupportingStudent Behavior
PositiveBehaviorSupport OUTCOMES
Social Competence &Academic Achievement
Implementation with Fidelity Means Stronger Student Outcomes!!!
PBIS Outcome Data2007-08 School Year
40%
84%
60%
66%
37%
70%
14%
62%
36%44%
31%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Reduction in No. of Students
in Self contained Classes
Fully ImplementingPartially Implementing
Reduction in BOTH Principal
and Superintendent
Suspensions
Reduction in no. of ELLs With IEPs
Improvement in Attendance
Met AdequateYearly
Progress (AYP)
30%
Reduction of Students in
Self-ContainedClasses
Met UniversalStandards
N= 53
37 16
Finding External Partnerships that Support School Improvement
• State and City agencies (Health, Mental Health, Parent Centers, Juvenile Justice, Child Welfare, Career Development, Substance Abuse Prevention)
• Department of Education Divisions/ Offices (DSWDELL, DAPS, School and Youth Development, School Health/Mental Health)
• Institutions of Higher Education (University Research Centers, Institutes, NYU and Columbia)
• Community organizations (Mental Health)
Scaling Up and Drilling Down 2009-14
• NYC PBIS TAC Five–Year Action Plan • - Coordinated Citywide Management System• - Increased Training and Coaching Capacity• - Streamlined Implementation Evaluation• - Alignment of Outcome Indicators with • Federal, State, and City Guidelines• - Diversified Funding for PBIS Activities (RTTT, IDEA)• - Visibility through Demonstrations (Pilots)• - Political Support and Collaborative Advocacy• with related institutions, agencies