New Sources of Capital from Target Date Funds October 16, 2012 National Association of Real Estate Investment Managers Moderator: Lennine Occhino Mayer Brown Panelists: Joshua Cohen Leonard Kaplan Laurie Tillinghast Russell Investments Prudential Real Estate Investors UBS Global Real Estate – US
13
Embed
New Sources of Capital from Target Date Funds October 16, 2012 National Association of Real Estate Investment Managers Moderator: Lennine Occhino Mayer.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
New Sources of Capital from Target Date Funds
October 16, 2012
National Association of Real Estate Investment Managers
Moderator:Lennine OcchinoMayer Brown
Panelists:Joshua Cohen Leonard Kaplan Laurie TillinghastRussell Investments Prudential Real Estate Investors UBS Global Real Estate – US
2
Distribution of US Private Pension Plan AssetsBy Plan Type 1975 – 2009
Source: U.S. Department of Labor: Form 5500 Annual Reports
3
Distribution of US Private Pension Plan ContributionsBy Plan Type 1975 – 2009
Source: U.S. Department of Labor: Form 5500 Annual Reports
4
Custom Target Date Fund Opportunity
• Assets in C-TDF about $54bn today – Projected growth to $530bn through 2015
– $450bn + increase next 3 years
• Of the $3.7 trillion in TDF assets by 2020 – 37% estimated to be in customized portfolios
Approaching $2 trillion in C-TDFs in next 8-10 years
Fiduciary Considerations in Using Institutional Commercial Real Estate
Key Considerations
ERISA
Risk/Return
Diversification
ERISA 404(c)
Cash Flow
QDIA
Prudence Standard of Care. Same as for a Defined Benefit Plan
The projected risk/return of the portfolio relative to the objectives of the target date/target risk fund or investment option
Lower correlations with public equities and public fixed investments
The Plan must offer participants the opportunity to give investment instructions among “a broad range of investment alternatives”
Liquidity and current return of the portfolio relative to the anticipated cash flow requirements of the plan
“applies generally accepted investment theories, is diversified so as to minimize the risk of large losses and that is designed to provide varying degrees of long-term appreciation and capital preservation through a mix of equity and fixed income exposures…,” such as balanced funds and target date funds
6
Sample Target Date Fund Glide Path
Source: Russell Investments. For illustrative purposes only.Please remember that all investments carry some level of risk. Although steps can be taken to help reduce risk it cannot be completely removed.
7
Why Custom?
Casey Quirk/PSCA April 2009 Survey of 397 plan sponsors. 61% use target date funds as the default.87% use off-the-shelf target date funds. 13% use custom target-date funds.
8
Russell’s Target Date Asset Allocation (early in glide path)Process depends on client fee sensitivity and risk tolerance
100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%
0%Core
PortfolioModel
PortfolioEnhanced Portfolio
US Large Cap EquityUS Small Cap EquityInternational EquityListed Real AssetsCore Fixed Income
Global High YieldGlobal EquityEmerging Equity
AlternativesPrivate Real Estate
Core Portfolio + Model Portfolio +
Hypothetical portfolios shown for illustrative purposes only.
9
Where does a direct RE product fit in a DC Plan?
Direct RE
3-10% of a Diversified, Custom Asset allocation or Real Asset fund
TargetDate Fund
Target Risk Fund
Custom BalancedFund
Real AssetFund
DiversifiedInflation Fund
Other Criteria:• Total Plan assets equal or greater than $500M• QDIA is TDF, TRF or Balanced Fund (lifecycle, lifestyle)• Custom (generic name) with “open architecture” • Staff with “DB-like thinking”
ManagedAccount
10
DC Real Estate Fund: “30,000 Foot View”
DC RE Fund
Private Real Estate Fund(s): 60-100%
Liquidity Components: 0-40%(REITs and/or cash)+
NAV determined by RE Manager and/or 3rd Party
Overall Fund NAV determined by custodian
NAV determined by fund(s)
C-TDF
Record keeper determines NAV
11
Liquidity ManagementManaging cash flows and liquidity needs of TDF Managers and Plan Sponsors
Factors to Consider• TDF Cash Flow• Rebalance methodology• Events that may trigger a material
change in cash flows; i.e., reenrollment, new participant enrollment, plan design changes
What to ask a Real Estate Manager• Are there liquidity queues to get in
and/or out of private real estate?• Does the manager deploy a multi-
fund approach or single strategy?• Utilize line of credit or back stop to
guarantee liquidity
PlanTDF
15% to 40% of Plan Assets
Real Estate 5% to 15% Allocation
Credit Line5-15%
Cash/REITs0-40%
Private Direct Property60-100%
12
Liquidity Versus Optimal Allocations
Cash/REITs20-40%
Direct Private Property60-80%
• Optimal allocation to produce desired outcome in TDF
• Trade off between liquidity and optimal allocation
• What is the real liquidity risk?
Liquidity Range0%
Private Direct Property
100%
Publically Traded REITs
13
Valuation MethodologiesRange of Approaches
Partially outsourced to 3rd PartiesValued
In-house
Valued by 3rd
Parties
• Transparency• Integrity of the internal
model• Frequency of change• Conflicts of interest• Organizational
confidence in change notification process
• Materiality levels• Frequency of change• Strength of market
database• Organizational
confidence in change notification process• Access to accounting
records of manager
1) Individual property appraisals
2) Appraiser review process at Fund level
3) Intra-quarter changes; capital deployed, extra-ordinary revenue/ expenses