1 Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC NEW FLEXIBILITIES FOR TIME AND EFFORT CERTIFICATIONS MIKE BENDER, ESQ. [email protected]BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC FALL FORUM 2014 Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 2 TIME AND EFFORT STANDARDS Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC THE BASICS – NO CHANGE! • If federal funds are used for salaries, then time distribution records are required. • How staff demonstrate allocability • If employee paid with federal funds, then must show that the employee worked on that specific federal program cost objective. 3
12
Embed
NEW FLEXIBILITIES FOR TIME AND EFFORT CERTIFICATIONS€¦ · 1 brustein & manasevit, pllc new flexibilities for time and effort certifications mike bender, esq. [email protected]
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
NEW FLEXIBILITIES FOR TIME AND EFFORT CERTIFICATIONS
• Charges for salaries must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed1. Must be supported by a system of internal controls
which provides reasonable assurance charges are accurate, allowable and properly allocated
2. Be incorporated into official records3. Reasonable reflect total activity for which
employee is compensated Percentages may be used for distribution of total
activities Not to exceed 100%
13
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
UNIFORM GRANT GUIDANCE STANDARDS
4. Encompass all activities (federal and non-federal)5. Comply with established accounting polices and
practices6. Support distribution among specific activities or
cost objectives
14
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
COFAR COMMENTS ON NEW RULE
By focusing more on internal controls, the rule“mitigates the risk that a non-Federal entity… willfocus on prescribed procedures... which alonemay be ineffective in assuring fullaccountability.”
• Uncovering weaknesses in internal controls orinstances of fraud is goal. Not audit findings.
15
6
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
CHANGES TO “COST OBJECTIVE”
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
UNIFORM GRANT GUIDANCE COST OBJECTIVES
What is a cost objective? 200.28 (slightly changed) Now applies to IHEs! Program, function, activity, award,
organizational subdivision, contract, or work unit for which cost data are desired and for which provision is made to accumulate and measure the cost of processes, products, jobs, capital projects, etc.
17
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
UGG COST OBJECTIVES (CONT)
Multiple Cost Objectives 200.430(vii): More than one Federal award. A Federal award and a non-Federal award. An indirect cost activity and a direct cost
activity. Two or more indirect activities that are
allocated using different allocation bases. An unallowable activity and a direct or
indirect cost activity.
18
7
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Flexibility in Reporting An Employee’s Time 2
19
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
NEED FOR CLARIFICATION
Always been confusion re: Cost objectives Do you track funding source or track what
employee is working on? For example, Project Director of 21st CCLC after
school program working 100% of her time on the 21st CCLC program but is paid 75% with 21st
• It is possible to work on a single cost objective even if an employee works on more than one Federal award or on a Federal award and a non-Federal award.
• The key to determining whether it is a single cost objective is whether the employee’s salary and wages can be supported in full from each of the Federal awards on which the employee is working or from the Federal award alone if the employee’s salary is also paid with non-Federal funds.
22
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OCFO GUIDANCE EXAMPLE OF SINGLE COST OBJECTIVES:
Title I, Part A funds and State compensatory education funds• An LEA supports a supplemental math teacher to
serve low-achieving students with 50 percent Title I, Part A funds and 50 percent State compensatory education funds.
• Because the LEA could support the teacher’s entire salary with the Title I, Part A funding, it is a single cost objective.
23
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OCFO GUIDANCE (CONT.)
• The guidance helps determine the number of cost objectives an employee is working on.
• Currently applies to state and local governments• Under UGG, who will it apply to now?
• Could ED say it does not apply to the UGG requirements?
24
9
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
FOCUS ON IHES
• “It is recognized that teaching, research, service, and administration are often inextricably intermingled in an academic setting. When recording salaries and wages charged to Federal awards for IHEs, a precise assessment of factors that contribute to costs is therefore not always feasible, nor is it expected.”
25
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
The Combination of Circulars Creates Subtle Differences 3
26
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
SUBSTITUTE SYSTEMS
•States, local governments and Indian tribesencouraged to adopt “substitute systems” ifapproved by cognizant agency for indirectcost. 200.430(i)(5)
•Still acceptable to allocate sampledemployees’ supervisors, clerical and supportstaffs, based on the result of the sampledemployees.
27
10
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
ALTERNATIVE PROPOSALS
Cognizant agencies for indirect costs are encouraged to accept alternative proposals based on outcomes and milestones for program performance.
These plans are acceptable as alternatives to the UGG’s standards.
28
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
BLENDED FUNDING
• A non-Federal entity may submit performance plans that incorporate funds from multiple Federal awards and account for their combined use based on performance-based metrics, if approved.
• Must submit a request for a waiver that includes certain information, including the method of charging costs.
29
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
USE OF BUDGET ESTIMATES
Budget estimates alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards 200.430(i)(1)(viii)May be used for interim accounting purposes
if: Produces reasonable approximations Significant changes to the corresponding work
activity are identified in a timely manner Internal controls in place to review after-the-fact
interim charges based on budget estimates
30
11
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
DOCUMENTATION
If records meet the standards, the non-federal entity will not be required to provide additional support or documentation for the work performed. 200.430(i)(2) BUT, if records of grantee do not meet new
standards, awarding agency may require PARs. 200.430(i)(8) However, PARs are not defined!!!
31
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
SO WHAT DOES ALL THIS MEAN??
32
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
WHAT’S NEXT?
• Finalized Regulations/Effective Date
• Changes by ED?• Change T&E policies?• Auditor Input?
33
12
Disclaimer
This presentation is intended solely to provide general information and does not constitute legal advice or a legal service. This presentation does not create a client-lawyer relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC and, therefore, carries none of the protections under the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct. Attendance at this presentation, a later review of any printed or electronic materials, or any follow-up questions or communications arising out of this presentation with any attorney at Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC does not create an attorney-client relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC. You should not take any action based upon any information in this presentation without first consulting legal counsel familiar with your particular circumstances.