Nevada Children’s Mental Health System of Care

Nevada Children’s Mental HealthSystem of Care

Presented By: Capa Casale, Subcommittee ChairJackie Harris, NBHC Chair

Commission/NBHC Subcommittee Members

Commission on Behavioral Health and Developmental Services Subcommittee on the Mental Health of Children Name Email addressCapa Casale, Chair [email protected] Johnson [email protected] Nussbaum [email protected] (Viki) Kinnikin [email protected] Cohen [email protected] Squitieri [email protected]

NCBH Consortium MembersName Affiliation Email address

Kelly Wooldridge

Division of Child and Family Services [email protected]

Joe Haas

Washoe County Juvenile/Social Services [email protected]

Jennifer Coleman O’Connor Clark County School District [email protected]

Jan Marson, Chair Rural Children’s Mental Health Consortium [email protected]

Cara Paoli, Chair Washoe County Children’s Mental Health Consortium

[email protected]

Jackie Harris, Chair Nevada Children’s Behavioral Health Consortium [email protected]

Karen Taycher

Nevada PEP [email protected]

Carol Broersma

Parent [email protected]

ConsultantJill Manit, UNR School of Social [email protected]

Aim: To ensure Nevada’s children and their families benefit from evidence based services and supports that are developed and delivered within a System of Care framework.

Strengthening Children’s Mental Health

Services in Nevada

System of CareA systematic network of children and families working in close collaboration with public and private providers to develop a comprehensive plan of care

“System of Care concept is a framework and a guide, not a prescription.”

“It was intended as an organizing framework and a value base.”

Pires, S. (2002). Building Systems of Care, A Primer.

System of Care Principles

Community BasedFamily Driven and Youth GuidedCulturally and linguistically CompetentIndividualized and Strength – BasedAccountability

(Baxter,2010; Foster-Fishman & Droege, 2010;Pires, 2010).

Services are delivered in the community, outside of institutional settings, such as a school or home.

6

Community Based

• In Systems of Care, full family participation requires mutual respect and meaningful partnership between families and professionals.

• Families and youth are decision makers in their own care and in the systems, policies, and procedures that govern care at every level

7

Family Driven and Youth Guided

Provide effective, equitable, understandable and respectful quality care and services that are responsive to diverse cultural health beliefs and practices, preferred languages, health literacy and other communication needs.

8

Culturally and Linguistically Competent

Every child and family enrolled in Systems of Care participates in an individualized plan of care that focuses on the needs, strengths, and challenges of the child and family.

9

Individualized & Strength-Based

Systems of Care ensure outcome data is collected, analyzed, and reported on the individual child and family services system, performance, and financial efficiencies.

10

Accountability

What Natural Helpers and Social Supports Can Provide

• Emotional support; moral & spiritual guidance• System support• Concrete help & advocacy• Decrease isolation • Community navigation• Resources & education• Greater understanding of

getting help or support

11Lazear, K., (2003) “Primer Hands On”; A skill building curriculum. Washington, D.C.: Human Service Collaborative.

12

Role of Parent Support Providers

Technical assistance providers & consultants• Training• Evaluation• Policy Development• Research• Support• Outreach/Dissemination

Direct service providers

• Family Liaisons

• Care Coordinators

• Family Educators

• Specific Program Managers (respite, etc.)

• Youth Peer Mentors

Wells, C. (2004). “Primer Hands On” for Family Organizations. Human Service Collaborative: Washington, D.C.

Systems of Care Implementation: 5 Enhancement Strategies1. Implementing policy, administrative, and regulatory

change

2. Developing or expanding services and supports based on the SOC philosophy and approach

3. Creating or improving financing strategies

4. Providing training, technical assistance, and coaching

5. Generating increased support for the SOC approach

Children’s Mental Health Leadership and Oversight

Mental Health and Developmental Services Commission NRS Chapter 433Clark and Washoe County Mental Health Consortium NRS 433BRural Mental Health Consortium NRS433BNevada Children’s Behavioral Health Consortium (not statutorily mandated)

Children’s Mental Health Leadership and Oversight

Establish policies to ensure adequate development and administration of services for persons with mental illness, developmental disabilities, and related conditions. The MHDS Commission has several powers related to the oversight of programs within the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). There are three principle DHHS divisions directly involved in this planning process: Mental Health and Developmental Services (MHDS), Child and Family Services (DCFS), and Health Care Financing and Policy (HCFAP). The MHDS Commission is also responsible for oversight of programs for co-occurring disorders since the Substance Abuse Prevention &Treatment Agency (SAPTA) is also housed within MHDS.

Commission on Behavioral Health and Developmental Services

Mental Health Consortiums

Pursuant to NRS 433.337 A mental health consortium may: Participate in activities within the jurisdiction of the consortium to:

      Implement the provisions of the long-term strategic plan established by the consortium pursuant to NRS 433B.335;  Each mental health consortium established pursuant to NRS 433B.333 shall prepare and submit to the Director of the Department a long-term strategic plan for the provision of mental health services to children with emotional disturbance in the jurisdiction of the consortium. A plan submitted pursuant to this section is valid for 10 years after the date of submission, and each consortium shall submit a new plan upon its expiration.    Improve the provision of mental health services to children with emotional disturbance and their families, including, without limitation, advertising the availability of mental health services and carrying out a demonstration project relating to mental health services.     To the extent practicable, a mental health consortium shall coordinate with the Department to avoid duplicating or contradicting the efforts of the Department to provide mental health services to children with emotional disturbance and their families

Children’s Mental Health Leadership and Oversight

Current Efforts in NevadaKey stakeholders include families, service providers,

administrators, and researchers.

• Commission on Behavioral Health and Developmental Services

• Nevada Behavioral Health Consortium• Commission/NBHC Subcommittee • Nevada PEP Statewide Family Network Partnership• Clark County Children’s Mental Health Consortium• Washoe County Children’s Mental Health Consortium• Rural Children’s Mental Health Consortium

Current Efforts in Nevada

In the past year, the Commission/NBHC Subcommittee has:

Conducted a comprehensive review of Nevada’s previous system of care implementation efforts and an analysis of gaps in the implementation processConducted an analysis of how existing efforts align with the Systems of Care guiding frameworkDeveloped strategies to implement an enhanced Nevada System of Care approach to the provision of children’s mental health services.

Overarching Strategy

The enhancement strategy (draft as of April 2014) has been adapted to the current Nevada approach and prioritized into 3 phases

Each phase is comprised of development and planning activities that will be followed by implementation strategies

A comprehensive evaluation plan will be developed and implemented for each phase of the strategy

Overarching Strategy

Phase One: Generate increased support and rebuild capacity for the Nevada System of Care

Develop a public awareness/social marketing plan to support Nevada system of care efforts and inform consumers about how to access services

Utilize Current resources such as the local Consortia, DCFS, and Nevada Partnership for Training to create a workforce development plan

DCFS will provide a “Nevada System of Care Chief” working in partnership with a Family Support specialist to oversee all System of Care Activities

Build on current training efforts in evidence based practices to include Trauma Informed Care, Wraparound Training, System of Care Training, Motivational Interviewing, Family Check-up, Aggression Replacement Training, and Brief Strategic Family Therapy

Develop and support a plan with local school districts to provide school based mental health services and Signs of Suicide (SOS) training across the State

Develop a plan to fund wraparound services that include all aspects of high fidelity wraparound to “high end, multiple system youth and families” no matter what their insurance or custody status.

Develop a plan to increase prevention activities across the State

Phase Two: Develop or expand service and supports based on the Nevada System of Care philosophy and approach.

Expand the current model of mobile crisis services across the State that includes a “no wrong door” philosophy, practice, and procedure. Mobile crisis will include Family to Family Support Services.

Continue support of Wraparound in Nevada (WIN) for “high need, multiple service youth and families.” DCFS will ensure WIN is practicing high fidelity wraparound services.

Develop a plan and support to propose legislation supporting the Nevada System of Care approach and establish DCFS as the Children’s Mental Health Authority. This includes accountability at the local levels through the regional consortia for approval of local policy and procedure, as well as the development of protocols for quality assurance and accountability.

Develop a memorandum of understanding with the Division of Health Care Financing and Policy to work toward a “Nevada System of Care” certification process for provider agencies, and unlicensed providers of publicly funded Children’s Mental Health Services. This will include technical assistance and quality assurance provided by DCFS to community providers.

Phase Three: system of accountability, management, and standards of care at the State and local level that focus on the implementation of the Nevada

System of Care for Children’s Mental and Behavioral Health

Next StepsThe Nevada System of Care enhancement system will need appropriate funding in order to adequately implement this evidence-based approach.