Page 1
ORIGINAL PAPER
Neuroprotective Effect of Sesame Seed Oil in 6-HydroxydopamineInduced Neurotoxicity in Mice Model: Cellular, Biochemicaland Neurochemical Evidence
Saif Ahmad • M. Badruzzaman Khan • M. Nasrul Hoda •
Kanchan Bhatia • Rizwanul Haque • Inayat Saleem Fazili •
Arshad Jamal • Jafar Salamt Khan • Deepshikha Pande Katare
Received: 3 September 2011 / Revised: 12 October 2011 / Accepted: 27 October 2011 / Published online: 17 November 2011
� Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011
Abstract Natural antioxidants have shown a remarkable
reduction in oxidative stress due to excess formation of
reactive oxygen species by enhancing antioxidant mecha-
nism in the neurodegenerative disorders. Sesame seed oil
(SO) is one of the most important edible oil in India as well
as in Asian countries and has potent antioxidant properties
thus the present study evaluated the neuroprotective effect
of SO by using 6-Hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-induced
Parkinson’s disease model in mice. The mice were fed an
SO mix diet for 15 days and then 6-OHDA was injected
into the right striatum of mice brain. Three weeks after
6-OHDA infusion, mice were sacrificed and the striatum
was removed. The neuroprotective role of SO on the
activities of antioxidant and non-antioxidant enzymes such
S. Ahmad (&) � I. S. Fazili � A. Jamal � D. P. Katare (&)
Department of Biotechnology, Jamia Hamdard (Hamdard
University), New Delhi 110 062, India
e-mail: [email protected]
D. P. Katare
e-mail: [email protected]
Present Address:S. Ahmad
Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Georgia
Health Sciences University (GHSU), Augusta, GA 30912, USA
M. B. Khan � M. N. Hoda � K. Bhatia � R. Haque
Department of Medical Elementology and Toxicology, Faculty
of Science, Jamia Hamdard (Hamdard University), New Delhi
110062, India
Present Address:M. B. Khan
Center for Molecular Chaperone/Radiobiology and Cancer
Virology, School of Medicine, Georgia Health Sciences
University (GHSU), Augusta, GA 30912, USA
Present Address:M. N. Hoda
Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Georgia Health
Sciences University (GHSU), Augusta, GA 30912, USA
Present Address:K. Bhatia
Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Georgia Health
Sciences University (GHSU), Augusta, GA 30912, USA
Present Address:R. Haque
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, C6749 Penn
State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA
17033, USA
Present Address:I. S. Fazili
Center of Animal Biotechnology, Sher-i-Kashmir University of
Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Shuhama (Alusteng),
Srinagar 190 006, India
Present Address:A. Jamal
Biological Science Department, College of Science and Arts
Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
J. S. Khan
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research(CSIR),
Anusandhan Bhawan, 2 Rafi Marg, New Delhi 110001, India
Present Address:D. P. Katare
Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Sector-125,
Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201303, India
123
Neurochem Res (2012) 37:516–526
DOI 10.1007/s11064-011-0638-4
Page 2
as glutathione reductase (GR), glutathione-S-transferase
(GST), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), catalase (CAT) and
content of glutathione (GSH) and thiobarbituric acid reactive
substance (TBARS) were studied in the striatum. The
activities of all the above-mentioned enzymes decreased
significantly in 6-OHDA group (Lesioned) when compared
with Sham. The pretreatment of SO on antioxidant mecha-
nism and dopamine level in the brain had shown some sig-
nificant improvement in Lesion?SO (L?SO) group when
compared with Lesioned group. However, NADPH oxidase
subunit, Nox2 and inflammatory stimulator Cox2 expression
was increased as well as antioxidant MnSOD level was
decreased in Lesioned group while SO showed the inhibitory
effect on the activation of Nox2 and Cox2 and restored
MnSOD expression in L?SO group. Increased tyrosine
hydroxylase (TH) expression in substantia nigra as well as
dopamine and its metabolite DOPAC level in L?SO group
also support our findings that SO may inhibit activation of
NADPH oxidase dependent inflammatory mechanism due to
6-OHDA induced neurotoxicity in mice.
Keywords Sesame seed oil (SO) � Parkinson disease
(PD) � Neurotoxicity � NADPH oxidase � Antioxidants �Tyrosine hydroxylase
Introduction
Free radical mediated oxidative stress plays an important
role in the functional impairments of brain and linked to
neuronal cell death in certain neurodegenerative disorders
[1]. However, brain cells possess many defense mechanisms
against reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS (superoxide
radical, O2-; hydrogen peroxide, H2O2; hydroxyl radical,
OH-), are mainly produced in mitochondria. Sometimes it
can be inadequate and may lead to oxidative stress in which
the production of ROS befuddles the antioxidant defenses of
the organism [2]. Reports indicate that oxygen derived rad-
icals are implicated in lipid peroxidation (LPO) events, and
are critical in neuronal injury as brain may be particularly
vulnerable to oxidative stress because of PUFAs, which are
particularly susceptible to free radicals mediated damage [2].
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common neu-
rodegenerative disorder and it is characterized by the pref-
erential degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the
substantia nigra pars compacta and a depletion of neuro-
transmitter dopamine in striatum [3]. Although the patho-
genesis of PD still remains unclear. Evidences suggest that
oxidative stress caused by an over production of ROS, is
involved in the etiology of Parkinson’s disease [2].
6-hydoxydopamine (6-OHDA, a hydroxylated analogue
of dopamine) is used to induce PD in animal as well as in vitro
studies [4, 5]. The neurotoxic effect of 6-OHDA is mainly due
to the oxidation of 6-OHDA, resulting in the generation of
cytotoxic free radicals via two major mechanisms, being a
substrate for monomine oxidase (MAO) and its auto-oxida-
tion activity, inhibits the mitrochondrial respiratory chain
which are believed to play a pivotal role in the degeneration of
nigrostriatal dopaminirgic system [6]. Furthermore, it has
been reported that 6-OHDA leads to a reduction in endoge-
nous cellular antioxidants such as superoxide dismutase
(SOD), glutathione (GSH) content, Catalase (CAT) and
increased the LPO, and protein damage [7].
Natural antioxidants have been reported as free radical
scavengers, which can ameliorate the risk of oxidative dam-
age and protect from apoptosis and cell death in several
human diseases including neurodegneration, hypertension
and cancer [8, 9]. Sesame seed oil (SO) has been considered a
potent antioxidant source which is derived from the plant
Sesame indicum L., and a famous oil seed crop and a com-
ponent of the traditional health food in India as well as in other
Asian countries [10]. SO contains a higher proportion of
monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) than saturated fatty
acids (SFA), and the main fatty acid compositions are oleic,
linoleic, palmetic, steric and archidic. [11]. SO also contains
good amounts of phenol, sesamin, sesamol and sesamolin and
relatively small amounts of tocopherol, which contribute to its
superior oxidative stability and plays an important role in
plant defense [12]. Recent finding has shown that SO
increases cell resistance to LPO and potently attenuates oxi-
dative stress triggered by the endotoxin lipopolysaccharide
(LPS) in rats [13]. SO in comparison to other dietary oils such
as groundnut, canola and sunflower oil depicted better pro-
tection against increased blood pressure, hyperlipidemea and
LPO by increasing enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxi-
dants [14]. Sesamin, sesamolin and tocopherols are powerful
antioxidants in SO, and have been reported to possess a broad
spectrum of pharmacological effects including neuroprotec-
tive, anti-inflammatory, antihypertensive and antimutagenic
[15–17]. Sesamin and sesamolin have been shown inhibitory
effect on LPS-activated p38 mitogen activated protein kinase
(MAPK) and nuclear factor kB (NF-kB) activation in mi-
croglial cells [18]. It has been shown that sesamin down
regulates cyclin D1 protein expression in human tumor cells,
induces neural differentiation in PC12 cells through activation
of ERK1/2 signalling, and improves endothelial dysfunction
in renovascular hypertensive rats [19, 20]. Reports demon-
strate that sesamin and sesamolin potently inhibited phos-
phorylation of JNK and caspase-3 under hypoxia in BV-2
cells [21]. Furthermore, sesamol has been found to inhibit
LPO, DNA cleavage and involved in activation of endoge-
nous antioxidant enzymes such as GSH, GST, Catalase, and
also protects DNA damage in mice [22].
To the best of our knowledge, no report has shown on
the preventive role of SO in 6-OHDA induced oxidative
stress in mice model of PD. In this study, we hypothesized
Neurochem Res (2012) 37:516–526 517
123
Page 3
that SO may regulate NADPH oxidase mediated anti-
inflammatory signaling and prevent neuronal cell death in
neurodegeneration by enhancing antioxidant defense
mechanism. Therefore, SO may be a good source of anti-
oxidant dietary supplement and thus, we examined the
neuroprotective role of SO in mice model of PD.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and Drugs
Glutathione (GSH), NADPH, ATP, qubain, 1-chloro-2,
4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB), 5-50-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic
acid (DTNB), oxidized glutathione (GSSG), glutathione
reductase (GR), thiobarbituric acid (TBA), 6-hydroxydop-
amine (6-OHDA), apomorphine hydrochloride, EDTA,
nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT), bovine serum albumin (BSA),
3, 4-dihydroxyphenyl acetic acid (DOPAC), 3, 4-dihydr-
oxybenzylamine (DHBA),Triton X-100, EDTA, EGTA,
NaF, Na4P2O7, Na3VO4, glycerol, SDS, deoxycholate,
phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) and protease
inhibitor cocktail, were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich,
USA, Antibodies (Tyrosine Hydroxilase, gp91phox [sc-
207820], MnSOD [sc-133254] and Cox-2 [sc-166475])
were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA,
b-actin [ab6276] was purchased from abcam, Cambridge,
MA, USA and other chemicals were AR grade.
Dietary Sesame Seed Oil
Authentic Sesame seed was provided by CSIR, New Delhi,
India. Oil was extracted from the sesame seeds according
to method of Fazli et al. [23]. In brief, the sesame seeds
were ground in a disintegrator. The ground seeds were
extracted with n-hexane for 48 h, and then filtered. This
process was repeated three times using fresh solvent each
time to extract most of the oils from the ground seeds. Free
fatty acids were determined by Gas Liquid Chromatogra-
phy (GLC) as per the protocol of Fazli et al. [23] and
sesamin and sesamol content were analyzed according to
method of Budowski et al. [24] (Data has already been
published in our earlier study Ahmad et al. [11]). Control
(fat free) diet was provided by Animal House Facility,
Hamdard University, New Delhi, India. SO was mixed in
the control diet in appropriate amount (200 ml SO (20%)
was mixed in 1 kg diet). Small pellets (*20 gm wt) were
prepared manually and dried at room temperature.
Animals and Experimental Protocol
Male swiss albino mice weighing 25–35 g (3–4 months-
old) were obtained from the Animal House Facility, Jamia
Hamdard (Hamdard University), New Delhi, India. Mice
were housed in the group of four animals per cage in
polypropylene cages at room temperature (25�C) in stan-
dard environment and were allowed free access to experi-
mental (20% SO mixed in fat free diet) and palette diet as
well as water ad libitum. Animals were divided in four
groups, eight animals each. First group (Sham) and second
group Lesion, i.e. 6-OHDA induced, were fed pellet diet,
third group (Lesioned?SO) was fed experimental diet and
the fourth group (Sham?SO) was also fed experimental
diet alone for 15 days. They were maintained on a 12/12 h
dark-light cycle. The animals were used in accordance with
the procedure approved by the Hamdard University Animal
Ethics Committee (Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India).
6-Hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) Lesions and Tissue
Preparation
In brief, after 15 days pretreatment with SO, 6-OHDA was
injected into the striatum; a sham lesion with the same vol-
ume (2 ll) of solvent was performed into control mice stri-
atum. Mice were anaesthetized using chloralhydrate
(400 mg/kg, i.p.) and placed into a stereotactic frame adap-
ted for mice (David Kopf Instruments, USA). The skull was
exposed by making a small incision in the skin and lesions
were made by the unilateral injection of 6-hydroxydop-
amine. 6-OHDA was dissolved at a concentration of 2 lg/ll
saline in 0.2% ascorbic acid and 2 ll was injected at a rate of
0.5 ll/min. The needle was left in place for 5 min after the
injection before retraction. The injection was performed
using a Hamilton syringe at the following co-ordinates: AP:
?0.04 cm, ml: ± 0.18 cm, DV: -0.35 cm [43].
After 3 weeks of 6-OHDA injection, animals were kil-
led and brains were taken out quickly and kept on ice.
Striatum was dissected out. For enzymes and GSH assays,
striatum was homogenized in phosphate buffer (10% w/v,
pH 7.0) and centrifuge at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4�C to
get post mitochondrial supernatant (PMS).
Biochemical Assays
Assay of Lipid Peroxidation (LPO)
The procedure of Utley et al. [26] as modified by Islam et al.
[27] was used for estimating the rate of LPO. 1 ml of
homogenate (2.5% in chilled KCl) was pipetted in a glass
radioimmunoassay vial of 20 ml capacity and incubated at
37 ± 1�C in a metabolic shaker (120 rpm/min) for 60 min.
Similarly, 1.0 ml of the same homogenate was pipetted in a
centrifuge tube and incubated at 0�C. After 1 h of incubation,
1.0 ml 5% chilled TCA was added followed by 1.0 ml of
0.67% TBA in each vial and proper mixing was performed
after each addition. The aliquot from each vial was
518 Neurochem Res (2012) 37:516–526
123
Page 4
transferred to a centrifuge tube and centrifuged at 3,500 rpm
for 15 min. Thereafter, the supernatant was placed in a
boiling water bath. After 10 min, the test tubes were cooled
and the absorbance of the color was read at 535 nm. The rate
of LPO was expressed as n mol TBARS formed/h/mg protein.
Estimation of Reduced Glutathione (GSH) Activity
Reduced glutathione was assayed by the method of Jollow
et al. [25]. One ml PMS (10%) was precipitated with 1.0 ml
sulfosalicylic acid (4%). The samples were kept at 4�C for
1 h and then subjected to centrifugation at 1,200g for 15 min
at 4�C. The assay mixture was contained 0.1 ml filtered
aliquot, 2.7 ml phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.4) and 0.2 ml
DTNB (0.4% in phosphate buffer 0.4 M, pH 7.4) in a total
volume of 3.0 ml. The activity was read immediately at
412 nm. The results were expressed as n mol GSH/g tissue.
Estimation of Glutathione-S-Transferase activity (GST)
Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) activity was measured by
the method of Habig et al. [28]. The reaction mixture
consisted of 1.425 ml phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.4),
0.2 ml reduced glutathione (1 mM), 0.025 ml CDNB
(1 mM) and 0.3 ml PMS (10%) in a total volume of 2.0 ml.
The changes in absorbance were recorded at 340 nm and
enzyme activity was calculated as nmole CDNB conjugate
formed/min/mg protein using a molar extinction coefficient
of 9.6 9 103 M-1 cm-1.
Glutathione Peroxide Activity (GPx)
GPx was estimated according to the procedure described by
Mohandas et al. [29]. The reaction mixture consisted of
1.44 ml phosphate buffer (0.05 M, pH 7.0), 0.1 ml EDTA
(1 mM), 0.1 ml of sodium azide (1 mM), 0.05 ml of gluta-
thione reductase (1 EU/ml), 0.10 ml of glutathione (1 mM),
0.10 ml of NADPH (0.2 mM), 0.01 ml of hydrogen perox-
ide (0.25 mM) and 0.1 ml of PMS in the final volume of
2 ml. The disappearance of NADPH at 340 nm was recorded
at room temperature. The enzyme activity was calculated as
nmol NADPH oxidized/min/mg/protein by using the molar
extinction coefficient 6.22 9 103 M-1 cm-1.
Glutathione Reductase Activity (GR)
Glutathione reductase activity was assayed by the method of
Carlberg and Mannervik [30], as modified by Mohandas
et al. [29]. The assay mixture consisted of 1.65 ml phosphate
buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.6), 0.1 ml NADPH (0.1 mM), 0.1 ml
EDTA (0.5 mM) and 0.05 ml oxidized glutathione (1 mM)
and 0.1 ml of PMS in total volume of 2 ml. The enzyme
activity was estimated at room temperature by measuring the
disappearance of NADPH at 340 nm and was calculated as
nmol NADPH oxidized/min/mg protein using molar
extinction coefficient of 6.22 9 10-3 M-1 cm-1.
Catalase Activity (CAT)
Catalase activity was assayed by the method of Claiborne
[31]. Briefly, the assay mixture consisted of 1.95 ml
phosphate buffer (0.05 M, pH 7.0), 1.0 ml hydrogen per-
oxide (0.019 M) and 0.05 ml PMS in total volume of
3.0 ml. The change in absorbance was recorded at 240 nm.
Catalase activity was calculated as nmol of H2O2 con-
sumed/min/mg/protein.
Superoxide Dismutase Activity (SOD)
SOD activity was measured by the method of Beauchamp
et al. [32]. The reaction mixture consisted of 0.5 M phos-
phate buffer pH 7.4, 0.1 ml PMS, 1.0 mM xanthine, 57 lM
NBT. It was incubated for 15 min at room temperature and
the reaction was initiated by the addition of 50 mU xan-
thine oxidase. The rate of reaction was measured by
recording change in the absorbance at 550 nm due to for-
mation of formazan, a reduction product of NBT.
Quantification of Dopamine and its Metabolite
The striatal tissue levels of DA and its metabolite DOPAC
were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography
(Waters, USA), using Photodiode Array Detector (PDA
detector) by the method of Zafar et al. (2003). The striatum
(20% wt./vol.) was sonicated in 0.4 N perchloric acid con-
taining 100 ng/ml of the internal standard DHBA (2,
3-dihydroxybenzoic acid), followed by centrifugation at
15,0009g for 10 min at 4�C and the filtered through a 0.20-
lm membrane that was injected manually through a 20-ll
loop over the C18 column for separation and quantification.
The mobile phase consisted of 0.1 M potassium phosphate
(pH 4.0), 10% methanol, and 1.0 mM heptane sulfonic acid.
Samples were separated on C18 column using a flow rate of
1.0 ml/min. The concentrations of DA and its metabolite
DOPAC were calculated using a standard curve generated by
determining ratio between three known amounts of the amine
or its metabolites and a constant amount of internal standard
DHBA and represented as nanograms per milligram of tissue.
Western-Blot Analysis
Frozen brain tissues from -80�C were taken out and
washed with cold PBS (pH 7.5) and lysed in lysis buffer
containing Tris–HCl (50 mM, pH 8.0), NaCl (150 mM),
Triton X-100 (1%), EDTA (1 mM), EGTA (1 mM), NaF
(1 mM), Na4P2O7 (20 mM), Na3VO4 (2 mM), glycerol
Neurochem Res (2012) 37:516–526 519
123
Page 5
(10%), SDS (0.1%), deoxycholate (0.5%), PMSF (100ug/
ml) and protease inhibitor cocktail. The lysate was centri-
fuged at 14,0009g for 10 min at 4�C and the supernatant
was collected. Equal amount of protein were separated on
10% SDS–polyacrylamide gels. Proteins were transferred
onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes and
blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk in Tris-buffer saline with
0.1% Tween 20 (TBS-T) for 1 h at room temperature. The
membranes were incubated overnight with different pri-
mary antibodies (anti-gp91phox [1:500], anti-COX-2
[1:500], anti-MnSOD [1:1,000] and anti-b actin [1:5,000]).
After three washings with TBS-T, membranes were incu-
bated with secondary horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
antibody at room temperature for 1 h, followed by three
washings with TBS-T. The bands were visualized on a
Biomax X-ray film (Kodak) by using enhanced chemilu-
minescence and quantified by densitometric analysis. All
data from the three independent experiments were
expressed as a ratio to optical density (OD).
Immunohistochemical Analysis
Immunohistochemical analysis was done for TH?ve neu-
rons in substantia nigra of mice brain by using MOM kit
(Vector Laboratories, CA, USA). In brief, brain paraffin
slides for each group were de-paraffinized following by
antigen retrieval in citrate buffer. The endogenous perox-
idase activity was blocked by 3% hydrogen peroxide. Brain
slides were incubated into blocking reagent for 1 h and
after washing with PBS, slides were incubated into anti-TH
antibody (1:500) for 30 min at room temperature. After
incubation, slides were washed three times and further
incubated into biotinylated secondary antibody for 10 min.
After subsequent washing and following by ABC reagent
incubation, the colour for peroxidase-linked antibody was
developed with DAB as chromogen. Reaction was stopped
into water and hematoxylin was used for the nuclei stain-
ing, then sections were dehydrated and mounted with cover
slip by using aqueous mounting medium (Vector Labora-
tories, CA, USA) and pictures were taken by using Carl
Zeiss microscope (USA). The immunohistochemistry pro-
tocol comes with the MOM kit.
Estimation of Protein
Protein was estimated by the method of Bradford [33]
using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard.
Statistical Analysis
Results are expressed as Mean ± SE (n = 6). Differences
between the means of experimental and control groups
were analyzed statistically by using student’s t-test and
one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tu-
key–Kramer post hoc test for multiple comparisons. A
value P \ 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Effect of SO on LPO and GSH
Figure 1a, b shows the effect of dietary SO on the TBARS
and GSH content in 6-OHDA induced neurotoxicity.
TBARS is the marker for LPO in oxidative stress and
excess generation of ROS is implicated in this event and
GSH, antioxidant which is known to quench increased
ROS generation. The content of TBARS in mice brain was
significantly elevated (P B 0.001) in Lesioned (L) group as
compared to Sham group and its content was significantly
decreased in L?SO group (P B 0.01). The level of GSH
content was significantly depleted (P B 0.001) in Lesioned
group as compared to Sham group and significantly
attenuated in L?SO group (P B 0.05) when compared
with L group. No significant changes were observed
between SO and Sham group.
Effect of SO on SOD and Catalase
Figure 2a, b shows the activity of superoxide dismutase
(SOD) and Catalase (CAT). SOD, endogenous antioxidant
enzyme which dismutase superoxide radicals into hydrogen
peroxide and later CAT converts H2O2 into H2O. SOD and
CAT were significantly decreased in L group (P B 0.001)
as compared to Sham group. Enzymatic activities were
observed to improve significantly in Lesioned?SO group
as compared to Lesioned group (P B 0.05). No significant
changes were observed between SO and Sham group.
Effect of SO on GPx, GR and GST
GPx, GR and GST, endogenous antioxidant enzymes have
been reported significant role in reducing oxidative stress
by inhibiting excess ROS generation in the cells. Table 1
shows the significant decrease (P B 0.01) in the activity of
endogenous antioxidants GPx, GR and GST in L group
when compared with Sham. Enzymatic activities were
observed to improve significantly in Lesioned?SO group
(P B 0.01, P B 0.05) as compared to Lesioned group.
There was no significant difference found between SO
alone and Sham group.
Estimation of Dopamine and DOPAC levels
Table 2 shows the significant decreased (P \ 0.001) in the
level of DA and DOPAC in striatal region of 6-OHDA-
520 Neurochem Res (2012) 37:516–526
123
Page 6
lesioned mice as compared to Sham group which indicates
a significant loss of dopaminergic neurons in Lesioned
group. SO?Lesioned group exhibited significant increase
in DA and DOPAC level comparison to Lesioned group
mice that shows functional viability of dopaminergic neu-
rons. No significant change was observed in the SO alone
pretreated sham group (SO?S) as compared to Sham
group.
Effect of SO on Nox2, Cox-2 and SOD Protein
Expression in Mice Brain
To confirm 6-OHDA induced neurotoxicity on signal
transduction, we performed Western blot analysis to
investigate the expression of the NADPH oxidase subunit
Nox-2, a marker of oxidative stress and has been impli-
cated in neurodegenerative disorders. Results show an
Fig. 1 a Neuroprotective effect of SO on the content of
TBARS (TBARS formed/h/mg protein) in mice striatum.
Values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 6). ***P \ 0.001
sham versus Lesion; ##P \ 0.01 Lesion versus Lesion?SO.
b Neuroprotective effect of SO on the content of GSH (GSH/g
tissue) in mice striatum.Values are expressed as mean ± SE
(n = 6). ***P \ 0.001 sham versus Lesion; #P \ 0.05 Lesion
versus Lesion?SO
Fig. 2 a Neuroprotective effect of SO on the content of SOD (nmole
of epinephrine protected from oxidation/min/mg protein) in mice
striatum. Values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 6). ***P \ 0.001
sham versus Lesion; #P \ 0.05 Lesion versus Lesion?SO.
b Neuroprotective effect of SO on the content of CAT (nmol of
H2O2 consumed/min/mg/protein) in mice striatum. Values are
expressed as mean ± SE (n = 6). *P \ 0.05 sham versus Lesion;#P \ 0.05 Lesion versus Lesion?SO
Table 1 Neuroprotective effect of SO on activities of antioxidant enzymes in mice striatum in different treatment groups
Antioxidant Enzymes
Groups GST GR GPx
I (Sham) 119.46 ± 5.11 235.87 ± 15.86 316.51 ± 16.14
II (SO) 120.30 ± 6.82 226.75 ± 16.94 309.69 ± 20.98
III (L) 106.80 ± 7.34** 172.34 ± 13.64*** 249.84 ± 17.72***
IV (L?SO) 114.33 ± 5.14# 197.65 ± 17.21# 283.62 ± 15.51##
Values are express as means ± SE (n = 6). GST expressed as nmol CDNB conjugates/min/mg protein, GR as nmol NADPH oxidized/min/mg
protein, and GPx as nmol NADPH oxidized/min/mg protein. The values observed were significant at ***P \ 0.001 and **P \ 0.01 when
compared to Sham versus Lesion, #P \ 0.05 and ##P \ 0.01 when compared to Lesion versus Lesion?SO
Neurochem Res (2012) 37:516–526 521
123
Page 7
enhanced level of expression of Nox-2 in Lesioned group
(P B 0.01) when compared with Sham group and the
L?SO group shows the least expression (P B 0.05)
(Fig. 3). The expression of Cox-2, an inflammatory marker
which is known to stimulate inflammatory mechanism, was
enhanced in Lesioned group (P B 0.01) when compared
with Sham group but the Lesioned?SO group (P B 0.05)
showed less expression as compared with lesion alone
(Fig. 4). The antioxidant enzyme MnSOD expression was
significantly depleted (P B 0.01) in Lesioned group as
compared with Sham group but it shows an increased
expression level in Lesioned?SO group (P B 0.05)
(Fig. 5).
Table 2 Neuroprotective effect of SO on dopamine and DOPAC
levels in 6-OHDA induced mice brain striatum
Group DA (ng/mg tissue) DOPAC (ng/mg tissue)
Sham 5.76 ± 0.29 1.23 ± 0.093
SO 5.97 ± 0.38 1.28 ± 0.086
Lesion 1.85 ± 0.18*** 0.55 ± 0.073***
L?SO 3.92 ± 0.37# 0.91 ± 0.090#
The values are expressed as mean SEM (n = 6). 6-OHDA signifi-
cantly decreases dopamine and DOPAC level in Lesion group as
compared to Sham group. Treatment of SO shows significant atten-
uation in the level of dopamine and DOPAC in L?SO group as
compared to L group. Values in parentheses show the increase or
decrease with respect to their control. #P \ 0.05, L versus L?SO and
***P \ 0.001, L versus Sham
Sham SO Lesion L+SO
Nox-2
β-actin
a
b
Fig. 3 Effect of SO on the protein expression of Nox2 in mice brain
by Western blotting. a represents Nox2 and b-actin expression as well
as b is the histogram represents densitometry analysis normalized to
the corresponding b-actin. Values are expressed as mean ± SE
(n = 6). ***P \ 0.01 sham versus Lesion; #P \ 0.05 Lesion versus
Lesion?SO
Sham SO Lesion L+SO
COX-2
β-actin
a
b
Fig. 4 Effect of SO on the protein expression of Cox2 in mice brain by
Western blotting. a represents Nox2 and b-actin expression as well as
b is the histogram represents densitometry analysis normalized to the
corresponding b-actin. Values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 6).
***P \ 0.01 sham versus Lesion; #P \ 0.05 Lesion versus Lesion?SO
Sham SO Lesion L+SO
MnSOD
β-actin
a
b
Fig. 5 Effect of SO on the protein expression of MnSOD in mice
brain by Western blotting. a represents Nox2 and b-actin expression
as well as b is the histogram represents densitometry analysis
normalized to the corresponding b-actin. Values are expressed as
mean ± SE (n = 6). ***P \ 0.01 sham versus Lesion; #P \ 0.05
Lesion versus Lesion?SO
522 Neurochem Res (2012) 37:516–526
123
Page 8
Tyrosine Hydroxylase (TH) Immunohistochemistry
Figure 6 shows the neuroprotective role of SO and func-
tional viability of dopaminergic neurons in the SNpc. In the
Lesioned group, we found that the Tyrosine hydroxylase
positive neurons were degenerated and died as compared to
Sham group. Whereas TH?ve neurons in Lesioned?SO
group were more pronounced as compared to Lesioned
group and exhibited a better survival. SO pretreatment did
not show any remarkable effects in the SO compared with
the Sham group (data not shown).
Discussion
In the present study, we evaluated the neuroprotective role
of SO and its antioxidant properties in 6-OHDA infused PD
mice model. Recent findings suggest that the pathogenesis
of several neurodegenerative diseases, including PD, Alz-
heimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lat-
eral sclerosis, may involve the generation of ROS, which
causes oxidative stress [1, 8]. Oxidative stress has been
associated with oxidant-antioxidant imbalance, and thought
to underlie defects in energy metabolism and induce cel-
lular degeneration [2]. The excess production of ROS can
lead to oxidative damage in the brain of PD, which
increases the LPO and DNA damage in the substantia nigra
[34, 35]. Here our observations showed that SO decreases
the 6-OHDA induced neurotoxicity and restores of striatal
dopamine and its metabolites in mice brain by enhancing
and activating antioxidant defense mechanisms which
indicates that SO may act as an intracellular ROS scav-
enger. The earlier reports suggest that the antioxidant
compounds present in SO such as sesamin, sesamol and
sesamolin inhibit excess production of ROS in various
human diseases like hypertension, endothelial dysfunction
and hepatic disorder and also inhibit 20-Hydroxyeicosa-
tetraenoic acid synthesis which is involved in renal dys-
function [17, 36].
In our investigation, we demonstrated that the infusion
of 6-OHDA in brain increased LPO and diminished GSH
activity in lesion group as compared to sham. Brain cells
are vulnerable to oxidative stress and then excess genera-
tion of ROS may alter the antioxidant defense mechanism
in the cells and increase the LPO. However, SO treatment
with lesion group decreases the TBARS level and increases
GSH activity in the brain striatum when compared with the
lesion group. It may be concluded that SO significantly
diminishes the generation of hydroxyl radicals, which
resulted in the suppression of LPO.
Cellular antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dis-
mutases (SODs), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase
(GPx), glutathione reductase (GR) and reduced glutathione
(GST) and non-enzymatic glutathione (GSH) in the brain
play important role in cellular defense against oxidative
damage by ROS [2]. SOD coverts superoxide radicals to
form H2O2 and CAT and GPx are involved in the detoxi-
fication of H2O2 both at high and low concentrations [37,
38]. In the earlier studies, researchers have demonstrated
that the brain contains low CAT levels and hence GPx has
a major role in quenching H2O2 and other peroxides which
otherwise lead to production of hydroxyl and peroxyl
radicals [7]. GR is another important enzyme for the
maintenance of intracellular concentration of GSH [39].
However, GSH serves as primary antioxidant defense
against oxidative stress and plays an important role in the
behavioral activity [40] and GST involves in the detoxifi-
cation of oxidized metabolites of catecholamines (o-qui-
none), and may serve as antioxidant, preventing
degenerative processes [41]. We found that antioxidant
enzymatic activities were reduced in lesion group as
compared to sham and treatment of SO shows significant
Sham Lesion Lesion + SO
TH+neurons
TH+neurons
50µm50µm 50µm
Fig. 6 Immunohistochemical analysis of pre-treatment effect of SO
on TH expression in right SNpc in mice infused with 6-OHDA. The
expression of tyrosine hydroxylase was significantly reduced in
Lesion group (20X) compared to Sham group (20X), while the
Lesioned group pretreated with SO has shown a moderate staining of
tyrosine hydroxylase and better survival of dopaminergic neurons
(20X). However, the SO group has not shown any significant change
in tyrosine hydroxylase staining when compared with Sham (picture
not shown)
Neurochem Res (2012) 37:516–526 523
123
Page 9
improvement in enzymatic activities in lesion?SO group
when compared with lesion. Additionally, the brain dopa-
mine has long been associated with the neurotoxicity,
which undergoes spontaneous oxidation to toxic quinone
and other electrophilic species, causing PD [42] and the
administration of natural antioxidants reverse this process
and stop the reduction of brain dopamine levels [43], and it
may be possible due to reduction in auto-oxidation of
dopamine. Thus, our results are consistent with earlier
studies where natural antioxidants play potential role in
balancing antioxidant enzymatic activity [44, 45]. Our
results are also in agreement with Cheng et al. [15], who
has reported the neuroprotective role of sesamin and ses-
amolin on gerbil brain in cerebral ischemia.
Furthermore, we investigated the expression of signaling
molecules NADPH oxidase subunit Nox2, and the
inflammatory agent Cox-2, as well as MnSOD in mice
brain. NADPH oxidase, a multiunit enzyme first discovered
in neutrophils, has emerged as a major molecule of ROS
generator in neurons, glial cells and cerebral blood vessels
and produces a large amount of O2- in leukocytes, and has
a role in various neurodegenerative diseases as gp91phox
increases in the brain after intracerebral hemorrhage,
resulting in enhanced LPO [46]. In this study, 6-OHDA
infusion in mice brain significantly enhanced the Nox2
expression in lesion group and SO treatment effectively
down regulated its expression in SO?Lesion group. This
demonstrates that the SO in presence of powerful antioxi-
dants, inhibits activation of NADPH oxidase signaling,
lowering the ROS generation in the brain, and preventing
neuronal damage. Nakano et al. [47] reported that sesamin,
a component of SO decreases superoxide production and
suppresses mRNA expression of NADPH oxidase in aorta
of hypertensive rat. Our results are in agreement with other
study that the microglial cell, gp91phox appeared to be
involved in the induction of neuronal damage in neurode-
generative disorders and study suggests that inhibition of
NADPH oxidase is an important therapeutic target for
neuroprotection [48].
Cox-2 plays an important role in neurodegeneration and
inflammatory mechanism in the brain and it was reported
that selective Cox-2 inhibition prevents progressive dopa-
mine neuron degeneration in PD [49]. SO treatment sig-
nificantly decreased the elevated level of Cox-2 protein
expression in 6-OHDA induced mice brain, which shows
that SO may inhibit the inflammatory cytokines activation
via Cox-2 signaling. Several reports also indicate that ses-
amin and sesamol have anti-inflammatory effects as they
inhibit N-formyl-methionyl-phenylalanine (fMLF)-induced
inflammatory response through a NF-kB–related signaling
pathway, down regulate IL-6 and cyclin D1 expression in
human cells, suppresses LPS induced cytokines production
and also have modulatory effect on TH, and iNOS protein
expression in dopaminergic cells [50–52]. Another natural
antioxidant resveratrol, was reported to decrease Cox-2 and
TNF-a mRNA expression in 6-OHDA infused rat’s brain
[44], which shows that natural compounds can modulate the
pro-inflammatory mechanism.
Antioxidant enzyme SOD, which converts the super-
oxide radicals into H2O2, is further metabolized to water by
catalase has shown important role in the neurodegeneration
and the impaired mitochondrial complex I activity and
reduced SOD activity have already been reported in PD
brain [53]. Our results indicate that SO restored the
MnSOD protein expression in lesion?SO group and the
elevated MnSOD level as compared with lesion demon-
strates that SO enhances the ability of SOD to eliminate
superoxide radicals formed during 6-OHDA induced oxi-
dative stress. Lahaie-Collins et al. [16] reported similar
finding that sesamin modulates superoxide dismutase and
catalase in dopaminergic cells under 1-methyl-4-phen-
ylpyridinium (MPP?)-induced oxidative stress.
Tyrosine hydroxylase, a rate-limiting enzyme in the
formation of DA and marker for the DA neuron survival
showed increased localization in ipsilateral Spec in
lesion?SO group as compared to lesion and HPLC analysis
of dopamine and its metabolite DOPAC level in the stria-
tum was also significantly high in the treatment group,
which suggests that SO may block the activation of cell
death receptor signaling. Previously, it has been reported
that the sesamin and sesamolin inhibit c-jun N-terminal
kinase (JNK), p38 MAPKs and caspase-3 activation under
hypoxia in PC12 cells [19, 21]. Our results are also an
agreement with other studies, which show that natural
antioxidants such as Gingo biloba, Curcuma oil, curcumin,
resveratrol, and baicalein can reduce oxidative damage in
neurodegeneration and act as neuroprotective agents [6, 7,
44, 54, 55]. Thus, SO may act as a potent ROS scavenger
and anti-inflammatory in neurodegenerative disorders.
Nevertheless, further study is needed to evaluate molecular
mechanisms.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrated a pro-
tective role of SO due to 6-OHDA induced oxidative stress
in mice brain by enhancing the activities of antioxidant
enzymes, decreasing the TBARS content, TH positive
expression and increased dopamine and its metabolite
DOPAC level. SO also shows the inhibitory effect on Nox2
activation that is implicated in excess generation of ROS in
neurodegenerative disorders including PD. Inflammatory
marker, Cox-2 expression also suppressed in lesion group
when compared with lesioned?SO group, and apart from
this antioxidant enzyme, MnSOD expression was also
restored in lesioned?SO group. These neuroprotective
effects may be due to the presence of potent antioxidants
such as sesamin, sesamolin, and sesamol in SO. Thus, our
finding suggests that SO may be a good neuroprotective
524 Neurochem Res (2012) 37:516–526
123
Page 10
agent. However, further evaluation of SO on molecular
level is essential.
Acknowledgments Authors are thankful to CSIR, Ministry of Sci-
ence and Technology, New Delhi, Govt. of India for providing
authentic sesame seed as a gift sample to carry out this research work.
This work was supported by women young scientist award (Depart-
ment of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi, Govt. of India)
to DPK. We greatly acknowledge Ms Sylvia Megyardi, Oral Biology
and Anatomy, GHSU, Augusta, GA, USA for reviewing and editing
this manuscript.
Conflict of interest There is no conflict of interest with any person
or other organization.
References
1. Andersen JK (2004) Oxidative stress in neurodegeneration: cause
or consequence? Nat Med 10:S18–S25
2. Cui K, Luo X, Xu K, Ven Murthy MR (2004) Role of oxidative
stress in neurodegeneration: recent developments in assay
methods for oxidative stress and nutraceutical antioxidants. Prog
Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 28:771–799
3. Hara H, Hiramatsu H, Adachi T (2007) Pyrroloquinoline quinone
is a potent neuroprotective nutrient against 6-hydroxydopamine-
induced neurotoxicity. Neurochem Res 32:489–495
4. Chao J, Yu MS, Ho YS et al (2008) Dietary oxyresveratrol pre-
vents parkinsonian mimetic 6-hydroxydopamine neurotoxicity.
Free Radic Biol Med 45:1019–1026
5. Gao QG, Chen WF, Xie JX et al (2009) Ginsenoside Rg1 protects
against 6- OHDA-induced neurotoxicity in neuroblastoma SK-N-
SH cells via IGF-I receptor and estrogen receptor pathways.
J Neurochem 109:1338–1347
6. Im HI, Nam E, Lee ES et al (2006) Baicalein Protects 6-OHDA -
induced neuronal damage by suppressing oxidative stress. Korean
J Physiol Pharmacol 10:309–315
7. Ahmad M, Saleem S, Ahmad AS, Yousuf S et al (2005) Ginkgo
biloba affords dose-dependent protection against 6-hydroxydop-
amine-induced parkinsonism in rats:neurobehavioural, neuro-
chemical and immunohistochemical evidences. J Neurochem 93:
94–104
8. Sun AY, Wang Q, Simonyi A et al (2008) Botanical phenolics
and brain health. Neuromol Med 10:259–274
9. Zhao B (2009) Natural antioxidants protect neurons in Alzhei-
mer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. Neurochem Res 34:
630–638
10. Shad KF, Al-Salam S, Hamza AA (2007) Sesame oil as a pro-
tective agent against doxorubicin induced cardio toxicity in rat.
Am J Pharmacol Toxicol 2:159–163
11. Ahmad S, Yousuf S, Ishrat T et al (2005) Effect of dietary sesame
oil as antioxidant on brain hippocampus of rat in focal cerebral
ischemia. Life Sci 79:1921–1928
12. Jeng KC, Hou RC, Wang JC et al (2005) Sesamin inhibits lipo-
polysaccharide- induced cytokine production by suppression of
p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and nuclear factor-kappaB.
Immunol Lett 97:101–106
13. Hsu DZ, Liu MY (2002) Sesame oil attenuates multiple organ
failure and increases survival rate during endotoxemia in rats.
Crit Care Med 30:1859–1862
14. Sankar D, Sambandam G, Ramakrishna Rao M et al (2005)
Modulation of blood pressure, lipid profiles and redox status in
hypertensive patients taking different edible oils. Clin Chim Acta
355:97–104
15. Cheng FC, Jinn TR, Hou RCW (2006) Neuroprotective effects of
sesamin and sesamolin on gerbil brain in cerebral ischemia. Int J
Biomed Sci 2:284–288
16. Lahaie-Collins V, Bournival J, Plouffe M et al (2008) Sesamin
modulates tyrosine hydroxylase, superoxide dismutase, catalase,
inducible NO synthase and interleukin-6 expression in dopami-
nergic cells under MPP?-induced oxidative stress. Oxid Med
Cell Longev 1:54–62
17. Kong X, Yang JR, Guo LQ et al (2009) Sesamin improves
endothelial dysfunction in renovascular hypertensive rats fed with
a high-fat, high-sucrose diet. Eur J Pharmacol 620:84–89
18. Jeng KCG, Hou RCW (2005) Sesamin and sesamolin: nature’s
therapeutic lignans. Curr Enzym Inhib 1:11–20
19. Hamada N, Fujita Y, Tanaka A et al (2009) Metabolites of ses-
amin, a major lignan in sesame seeds, induce neuronal differen-
tiation in PC12 cells through activation of ERK1/2 signaling
pathway. J Neural Transm 116:841–852
20. Yokota T, Matsuzaki Y, Koyama M et al (2007) Sesamin, a
lignan of sesame, down-regulates cyclin D1 protein expression in
human tumor cells. Cancer Sci 98:1447–1453
21. Hou RC, Wu CC, Yang CH et al (2004) Protective effects of
sesamin and sesamolin on murine BV-2 microglia cell line under
hypoxia. Neurosci Lett 367:10–13
22. Joshi R, Kumar MS, Satyamoorthy K et al (2005) Free radical
reactions and antioxidant activities of sesamol: pulse radiolytic
and biochemical studies. J Agric Food Chem 53:2696–2703
23. Fazli IS, Abdin MZ, Jamal A et al (2005) Interactive effect of
sulphur and nitrogen on lipid accumulation, acetyl- CoA con-
centration and acetyl-CoA carboxylase activity in developing
seeds of oilseed crops (Brassica campestris L. and Eruca sativa
Mill.). Plant Sci 168:29–36
24. Budowski P, Connor RT, Field ET (1950) Sesameoil: IV.
Determination of free and bound sesamol. J Am Oil Chem Soc
27:307–310
25. Jollow DJ, Mitchell JR, Zampaghone N et al (1974) Bromoben-
zene induced oxide as the hepatotoxic intermediate. Pharmacol-
ogy 11:161–169
26. Utley HC, Bernhein F, Hochslein P (1967) Effects of sulfhydryl
reagent on peroxidation in microsomes. Arch Biochem Biophys
260:521–531
27. Islam F, Zia S, Sayeed I et al (2002) Selenium induced alteration
on lipids, lipid peroxidation, and thiol group in circadian rhythm
centers of rat. Biol Trace Elem Res 90:1–12
28. Habig WH, Pabst MJ, Jokoby WB (1974) Glutathione-S-trans-
ferase:the first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation.
J Biol Chem 249:7130–7139
29. Mohandas J, Marshall JJ, Duggin GG et al (1984) Differential
distribution of glutathione and glutathione related enzymes in
rabbit kidneys: possible implication in analgesic neuropathy.
Cancer Res 44:5086–5091
30. Carlberg I, Mannervik B (1975) Glutathione reductase levels in
rat brain. J Biol Chem 250:5475–5480
31. Caliborne A (1985) Catalase activity. In: Wakd G (ed) CRC hand
book of methods for oxygen radical research. CRC Press, Boca
Raton, pp 283–284
32. Beauchamp C, Fridovich I (1971) Superoxide dismutase:
improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Ann
Biochem 44:276–287
33. Bradford MM (1976) Rapid and sensitive method for the quan-
titation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle
of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254
34. Halliwell B (2006) Oxidative stress and neurodegeneration:
where are we now? J Neurochem 97:1634–1658
Neurochem Res (2012) 37:516–526 525
123
Page 11
35. Cheung YT, Lau WK, Yu MS et al (2009) Effects of all-trans-
retinoic acid on human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma as in vitro
model in neurotoxicity research. Neurotox 30:127–135
36. Wu JH, Hodgson JM, Clarke MW et al (2009) Inhibition of 20-
hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid synthesis using specific plant lign-
ans: in vitro and human studies. Hyperten 54:1151–1158
37. Fridovich I (1995) Superoxide radical and superoxide dismutases.
Annu Rev Biochem 64:97–112
38. Boillee S, Cleveland DW (2008) Revisiting oxidative damage in
ALS: microglia, Nox, and mutant SOD1. J Clin Invest 118:474–478
39. Huang J, Philbert MA (1996) Cellular responses of cultured
cerebellar astrocytes to ethacrynic acid-induced perturbation of
subcellular glutathione homeostasis. Brain Res 711:184–192
40. Cruz-Auguado R, Almaguer-Melian W, Diaz MC (2001)
Behavioural and biochemical effects of glutathione depletion in
the rat brain. Brain Res Bull 55:327–333
41. Baez S, Segura-Aguilar J, Widersten M (1997) Glutathione
transferases catalyse the detoxication of oxidized metabolites (o-
quinones) of catecholamines and may serve as an antioxidant
system preventing degenerative cellular processes. Biochem J
324:25–28
42. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JM, Cross C (1992) Free radicals, anti-
oxidants, and human disease: where are we now? J Lab Clin Med
119:598–620
43. Zafar KS, Siddiqui A, Sayeed I et al (2003) Dose-dependent
protective effect of selenium in rat model of Parkinson’s disease:
neurobehavioral and neurochemical evidences. J Neurochem
84:438–446
44. Khan MM, Ahmad A, Ishrat T et al (2010) Resveratrol attenuates
6- hydroxydopamine-induced oxidative damage and dopamine
depletion in rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Brain Res 1328:
139–151
45. Liu T, Jin H, Sun QR et al (2010) The neuroprotective effects of
tanshinone IIA on b-amyloid-induced toxicity in rat cortical
neurons. Neuropharmacol 59:595–604
46. Brown DI, Griendling KK (2009) Nox proteins in signal trans-
duction. Free Radic Biol Med 47:1239–1253
47. Nakano D, Kurumazuka D, Nagai Y et al (2008) Dietary sesamin
suppresses aortic NADPH oxidase in DOCA salt hypertensive
rats. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 35:324–326
48. Anantharam V, Kaul S, Song C et al (2007) Pharmacological
inhibition of neuronal NADPH oxidase protects against 1-methyl-
4-phenylpyridinium (MPP?)-induced oxidative stress and apop-
tosis in mesencephalic dopaminergic neuronal cells. Neurotoxi-
cology 28:988–997
49. Teismann P, Vila M, Choi DK (2003) COX-2 and neurodegen-
eration in Parkinson’s disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci 991:272–277
50. Cui Y, Hou X, Chen J et al (2010) Sesamin inhibits bacterial
formylpeptide- induced inflammatory responses in a murine air-
pouch model and inTHP-1 human monocytes. Nutr J 140:
377–381
51. Utsunomiya T, Chavali SR, Zhong WW et al (2000) Effects of
sesamin- supplemented dietary fat emulsions on the ex vivo
production of lipopolysaccharide-induced prostanoids and tumor
necrosis factor alpha in rats. Am J Clin Nutr 72:804–808
52. Jin F, Wu Q, Lu YF et al (2008) Neuroprotective effect of res-
veratrol on 6-OHDA-induced Parkinson’s disease in rats. Eur J
Pharmacol 600:78–82
53. Callio J, Oury TD, Chu CT (2005) Manganese superoxide dis-
mutase protects against 6-hydroxydopamine injury in mouse
brains. J Biol Chem 280:18536–18542
54. Wang J, Du XX, Jiang H et al (2009) Curcumin attenuates
6-hydroxydopamine- induced cytotoxicity by anti-oxidation and
nuclear factor-kappa B modulation in MES23.5 cells. Biochem
Pharmacol 78:178–183
55. Rathore P, Dohare P, Varma S et al (2008) Curcuma oil: reduces
early accumulation of oxidative product and is anti-apoptogenic
in transient focal ischemia in rat brain. Neurochem Res 33:
1672–1682
526 Neurochem Res (2012) 37:516–526
123