FINDINGS: NETBACKUP IS 3X FASTER THAN COMPETITOR “C” WHEN PERFORMING A GRANULAR RECOVERY BACKUP. RESULTS FOR: GRANULAR RECOVERY 14:00 15:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 6:00 5:00 4:00 3:00 2:00 1:00 0:00 1X 2X 3X NetBackup enables granular recovery through a single-pass backup. Competitor “C” requires additional coordination between admins to enable granular recovery. 4:46 15:24 SPEED TEST 00:30 00:15 00:00 01:15 01:00 00:45 02:15 02:00 01:45 01:30 1,000 VMs 00:08 1X 5X 10X 15X 02:15 RESULTS FOR: ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTS 02:00 02:15 01:45 01:30 01:15 01:00 00:45 00:30 00:15 00:00 00:05 00:16 00:32 01:12 02:15 00:05 00:06 00:08 100 VMs 200 VMs 500 VMs 1,000 VMs Snapshots can be used to create quicker Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) and more aggressive Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs). When testing crash consistent backups, NetBackup’s snapshot technology backed up 1,000 virtual machines in less than 9 minutes while Competitor “C” required over 2 hours. NetBackup Competitor “C” FINDINGS: NETBACKUP REQUIRES LESS THAN 9 MINUTES TO BACK UP 1,000 VMS USING ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTS. COMPETITOR “C” REQUIRES OVER 2 HOURS TO COMPLETE THE SAME ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOT. TOTAL TIME TO COMPLETE backup (Hours:Minutes) FOR ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTS SPEED TEST (Hours:Minutes) 0 0 : 0 8 SPEED RESULTS FOR: HYPERVISOR-LEVEL BACKUP 9:00 11:00 13:00 15:00 7:00 5:00 3:00 1:00 0:25 2:52 0:43 1:11 2:51 6:16 14:32 NetBackup Competitor “C” 8:00 100 VMs 200 VMs 400 VMs 1,000 VMs Zoom & Rotate Lower times are better when it comes to backup windows. NetBackup saves you hours, especially in large-scale environments. As the environment scaled from 100 to 200, 400 and then 1,000 virtual machines, there were dramatic increases in the time required by Competitor "C" to perform the backups. TOTAL TIME TO COMPLETE BACKUP (Hours:Minutes) 15:00 11:00 13:00 9:00 7:00 5:00 3:00 1:00 1,000 VMs 1X 2X 3X 4X 5X 2:51 14:32 FOR HYPERVISOR-LEVEL BACKUP SPEED TEST FINDINGS: NETBACKUP IS 11 HOURS FASTER THAN COMPETITOR “C” WHEN BACKING UP 1,000 VMS (Hours:Minutes) Principled Technologies’ benchmark results show that in a growing enterprise data center using VMware, NetBackup will scale significantly better than Competitor “C”. NetBackup Competitor “C” RESULTS HYPERVISOR-LEVEL BACKUP & RECOVERY ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTS GRANULAR RECOVERY BACKUP & RECOVERY SCALABILITY BENCHMARK SCALE IN A VIRTUAL WORLD “ NetBackup IS THE MOST SCALABLE BACKUP & RECOVERY SOLUTION ” NetBackup FASTER 0 2 4 6 8 10 14 16 18 20 22 12 4 : 4 6 1 5 : 2 4 3 X 0 1 2 4 5 3 2 : 1 5 NetBackup FASTER 15 X 0 2 4 6 8 10 14 16 18 20 22 12 2 : 5 1 1 4 : 3 2 NetBackup FASTER 3 X Want More Details on How Competitor C Fared Against NetBackup? RESULTS VMware Virtual Machines Competitor “C” NetBackup TESTS PERFORMED BY An industry leader and expert in technology benchmark testing ALL TESTS BASED ON: • Enterprise Backup and Recovery Solutions • Scaling from 100 to 1,000 VMware VMs • Real-world Situations and Workloads WHAT IS THE MOST SCALABLE SOLUTION? NetBackup COMPETITOR “C” Principled ® Technologies VIRTUAL MACHINE GROWTH DATA GROWTH = X LARGE SCALE PROBLEM Part# 21352225 © 2015 Veritas Technologies Corporation. All rights reserved. Veritas and the Veritas Logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Veritas Technologies Corporation or its affiliates in the U.S. And other countries. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners. Updated 06/15 Download the Full Report Now go. veritas .com/nbu - vs - c