Neil Harrison Bristol Centre for Research in Lifelong Learning and Education (BRILLE) University of the West of England 16 th December 2010
Mar 28, 2015
Neil HarrisonBristol Centre for Research in Lifelong
Learning and Education (BRILLE)University of the West of England
16th December 2010
Research contextInternationalisation and student mobilitySeven undergraduate students enter UK for
every one that leavesProportion of international students in UK is
11% - and up to 35% in some universitiesMany UK ‘home’ students entering a new
world of cultural diversity
‘Internationalisation at Home’Wächter (2003); Teekens (2007)Internationalisation offers new opportunities
to students in their own country – not just for those who travel – e.g.Curriculum innovationEnhanced use of ICTDrawing on the experiences of incoming studentsDevelop concepts of global citizenship
However… the realityStudies from UK, US, Australia, New Zealand,
Spain, South Africa & GermanyLow levels of social and academic interaction
between home and international studentsIntercultural interactions cause anxiety and
sense of threat‘Passive xenophobia’ vs. ‘informed
cosmopolitanism’ (Peacock & Harrison 2009)
Research questions1. Why do different students react more
or less positively to cultural diversity at university?
2. Do elements of their early life experiences have an impact?
3. Do generally-accepted personality traits have an impact?
MethodologyQuantitative study based around online
questionnaireThree teaching-intensive universitiesE-mail sent to young second year UK full-time
undergraduates - prize drawBME students removed718 responses (6% response rate)
Key conceptsEthnocentrism: the tendency to have a strong
and inflexible connection to your own culture and/or a belief in its superiority
Cultural intelligence: the skills, attitudes and behaviours that enable a person to interact successfully across cultural boundaries
Measured via revised (shortened and contextualised) inventories
Independent variablesDemographics: gender & social class‘Big Five’ personality traits (McCrae 2009):
extraversion, neuroticism, openness, agreeableness & conscientiousness
History of travel: for leisure & to liveEarly life experiences: multicultural
upbringing, foreign language ability & international orientation
Results (1)Good internal reliability for all inventories (all
Cronbach α >= 0.73)Strong and significant negative correlation
between ethnocentrism and cultural intelligence (r = -0.506, p < 0.001)
Correlations between independent variables in line with expectations and wider literature
Results (2)Two linear regression models (5% sig. level)Predictors for cultural intelligence: openness,
agreeableness, multicultural upbringing, language ability & international orientation
Same for ethnocentrism, with addition of gender: men are more ethnocentric
Fair explanatory power (R2 = 0.21 for cultural intelligence and R2 = 0.18 for ethnocentrism)
Openness Agreeableness
Multicultural upbringing
Language ability International
orientation
Ethnocentrism
Cultural intelligence
Intercultural interaction
Gender
Discussion of findingsSome personality traits predictors – perhaps
surprisingly, extraversion and neuroticism notStudents with a multicultural upbringing and
language abilities have in-built advantageNature and role of ‘international orientation’Male tendency to ethnocentrism consistent
with previous studiesTravel abroad and social class not predictors
ConclusionsStudents don’t all arrive at university ‘the
same’ in terms of navigating diversityFindings begin to explain different behaviours
described by previous qualitative studiesPrevailing ‘sink-or-swim’ approach doesn’t
establish a baseline of shared understandingNeed for active management to realise
benefits from ‘internationalisation at home’
References McCrae, R. (2009). The Five-Factor Model of personality: consensus
and controversy. In P. Corr & G. Matthews (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peacock, N. & Harrison, N. (2009). “It’s so much easier to go with what’s easy”: ‘mindfulness’ and the discourse between home and international students in the UK. Journal of Studies in International Education, 13, 487-508.
Teekens, H. (Ed.). (2007). Internationalisation at home: ideas and ideals: EAIE occasional paper 20. Amsterdam: EAIE.
Wächter, B. (2003). An introduction: internationalisation at home in context. Journal of Studies in International Education, 7, 5-11.
Neil HarrisonBristol Centre for Research in Lifelong
Learning and Education (BRILLE)University of the West of England
16th December 2010