Near-Horizon Solution Near-Horizon Solution to DGP Perturbations to DGP Perturbations Ignacy Sawicki Ignacy Sawicki , Yong-Seon Song, Wayne Hu , Yong-Seon Song, Wayne Hu University of Chicago University of Chicago astro-ph/0606285 astro-ph/0606285 astro-ph/0606286 astro-ph/0606286
14
Embed
Near-Horizon Solution to DGP Perturbations Ignacy Sawicki, Yong-Seon Song, Wayne Hu University of Chicago astro-ph/0606285 astro-ph/0606286.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Near-Horizon Solution to Near-Horizon Solution to DGP PerturbationsDGP Perturbations
Ignacy SawickiIgnacy Sawicki, Yong-Seon Song, Wayne Hu, Yong-Seon Song, Wayne HuUniversity of ChicagoUniversity of Chicago
Sawicki Sawicki et al.et al. astro-astro-ph/0606285ph/0606285Song Song et al.et al.astro-ph/0606286astro-ph/0606286
SummarySummary New method for solving the evolution of linearised New method for solving the evolution of linearised
perturbations in DGP gravity using a scaling perturbations in DGP gravity using a scaling ansatzansatz
Method valid and under control at horizon scalesMethod valid and under control at horizon scales
Assuming HZ initial power spectrum, ISW-ISW too Assuming HZ initial power spectrum, ISW-ISW too large to fit WMAP datalarge to fit WMAP data
ISW-galaxy cross-correlation will be a robust ISW-galaxy cross-correlation will be a robust discriminator in the future, independent of power discriminator in the future, independent of power spectrumspectrum
Sawicki Sawicki et al.et al. astro-astro-ph/0606285ph/0606285Song Song et al.et al.astro-ph/0606286astro-ph/0606286
What if we don’t know the What if we don’t know the realreal equations equations of gravity. Friedman equation could beof gravity. Friedman equation could be
If we assumed GR were validIf we assumed GR were valid,, we would we would interpret our observations as accelerationinterpret our observations as acceleration
Sawicki Sawicki et al.et al. astro-astro-ph/0606285ph/0606285Song Song et al.et al.astro-ph/0606286astro-ph/0606286
Can linearise effective 4D equations in standard fashionCan linearise effective 4D equations in standard fashion
Pretend Pretend EEμνμν is a perfect fluid is a perfect fluid
Constrain Constrain EEμνμν through Bianchi identity through Bianchi identity
EEμνμν unavoidably unavoidably generated by matter perturbationsgenerated by matter perturbations ImpossibleImpossible to relate to relate ΔΔEE and and ππE E from on-brane dynamics from on-brane dynamics
Sawicki Sawicki et al.et al. astro-astro-ph/0606285ph/0606285Song Song et al.et al.astro-ph/0606286astro-ph/0606286
ÄÄ ¡¡ 33HHFF ((HH)) __ ++µµ
FF ((HH))kk22
aa22++
HHKK ((HH))rrcc
++22HHrrcc ¡¡ 11
rrccRRHH
¶¶
==22aa33
kk22KK ((HH))¹¹ 22½½¢¢
Dynamic Scaling (DS)Dynamic Scaling (DS):: Sawicki, Song and Hu astro-Sawicki, Song and Hu astro-ph/0606285ph/0606285
Use Mukohyama’s equation for master variable Use Mukohyama’s equation for master variable for scalar bulk perturbationsfor scalar bulk perturbations Wave equation in the bulkWave equation in the bulk
Components of Components of EEμνμν are functions of are functions of ΩΩ evaluated at the evaluated at the branebrane
Re-express Bianchi identity in terms of Re-express Bianchi identity in terms of ΩΩ
If can obtain If can obtain RR , we can close equations! , we can close equations!
Bulk ParameterisationBulk Parameterisation
¡¡
ÃÃ__
nnbb33
!! ..
++@@@@yy
µµnnbb33
@@ @@yy
¶¶¡¡
nnkk22
bb55 == 00
RR ´́11
@@ @@yy
Mukohyama PRD Mukohyama PRD 6262 (2000) (2000)
bb ´́ aa((11++ HH jjyyjj))
nn ´́ 11++
ÃÃ__HHHH
++ HH
!!
jjyyjj
Quasi-Static (QS)Quasi-Static (QS):: Koyama and Maartens JCAP Koyama and Maartens JCAP 06010601 (2006)(2006)
__qqEE ++±±EE
33¡¡
2299kk22¼¼EE ==
22rrcc__HH
33HH
··¢¢ ++ ¢¢ EE
11¡¡ 22HHrrcc++ gg((HH,, __HH))kk22¼¼EE ==33
¸̧
Sawicki Sawicki et al.et al. astro-astro-ph/0606285ph/0606285Song Song et al.et al.astro-ph/0606286astro-ph/0606286
Scaling AnsatzScaling Ansatz Assume Assume ΩΩ exhibits a scaling exhibits a scaling
behaviour to reduce master behaviour to reduce master PDE to an ODEPDE to an ODE
Require that Require that ΩΩ 0 at the 0 at the causal horizon, causal horizon, yHyH = = ξξhorhor
Use numerical integration Use numerical integration and iteration to find value of and iteration to find value of RR((aa) for each mode ) for each mode kk This allows This allows pp to vary as fn of to vary as fn of
scale factor and scale factor and kk Find that iteration converges Find that iteration converges
quickly and is stable to quickly and is stable to variation of initial guessvariation of initial guess
== AA((pp))aappGG((yyHH==»»hhoorr))
-6 -4 -2 0 2-10
-5
0
log a
R
0 0.5 10
0.5
1
k/aH=1
k/aH=10
k/aH=30
GG(( yy
HH== »»
hh oo rr))
yyHH==»»hhoorr
Sawicki Sawicki et al.et al. astro-astro-ph/0606285ph/0606285Song Song et al.et al.astro-ph/0606286astro-ph/0606286
Caveat EmptorCaveat Emptor
Linearised, Linearised, pure pure de Sitter solution of DGP has de Sitter solution of DGP has ghostghost
Matter appears to stabilise system at the classical Matter appears to stabilise system at the classical level: level: no no uncontrolled growth observed hereuncontrolled growth observed here
Potentials do grow as Potentials do grow as aa 1+1+εε on approach to de Sitter on approach to de Sitter ((future!future!), but ), but notnot exponential exponential
At small distances, DGP exhibits strong couplingAt small distances, DGP exhibits strong coupling Linearisation not appropriate forLinearisation not appropriate for For dark matter haloes, For dark matter haloes, RR ~ ~ rr**, so linear theory OK to , so linear theory OK to
describe interactions of haloes — not their structuredescribe interactions of haloes — not their structure
e.g. Charmousis e.g. Charmousis et al.et al. hep-th/0604086 hep-th/0604086
rr << rr¤¤ ´́ ((rr22cc rrgg))11==33
Sawicki Sawicki et al.et al. astro-astro-ph/0606285ph/0606285Song Song et al.et al.astro-ph/0606286astro-ph/0606286
Does the Geometry Fit?Does the Geometry Fit?
0
5
10
WMAP3+SNLS WMAP3+SNLS+KP
fDGPoDGP
Tension between SNe and CMB data excludes a flat DGP Tension between SNe and CMB data excludes a flat DGP cosmologycosmology a slightly open universe fits the billa slightly open universe fits the bill
BAO would exclude the model at 4.5BAO would exclude the model at 4.5σσ, but potentially , but potentially affected by strong-coupling regime affected by strong-coupling regime not a robust test of DGPnot a robust test of DGP
mm == 00..2222
hh== 00..6666
mm == 00..2200
kk == 00..003399
hh== 00..8800
mm == 00..2211
kk == 00..003322
hh== 00..7766
mm == 00..2244
hh== 00..6666
¢¢ÂÂ
22 ((DD
GGPP
¡¡LL CC
DDMM
))
Sawicki Sawicki et al.et al. astro-astro-ph/0606285ph/0606285Song Song et al.et al.astro-ph/0606286astro-ph/0606286
Sawicki Sawicki et al.et al. astro-astro-ph/0606285ph/0606285Song Song et al.et al.astro-ph/0606286astro-ph/0606286
Concluding RemarksConcluding Remarks Presented a new method of solving for linear Presented a new method of solving for linear
perturbations in DGP theory, opening the study of perturbations in DGP theory, opening the study of cosmology at scales where gravity is modifiedcosmology at scales where gravity is modified
DGP cosmology fits the geometry of universe DGP cosmology fits the geometry of universe provided provided that a small positive curvature is addedthat a small positive curvature is added
Decay of Newtonian potential is much faster and Decay of Newtonian potential is much faster and occurs earlier than in GRoccurs earlier than in GR Results in a much stronger ISW effectResults in a much stronger ISW effect
Galaxy-ISW cross-correlation differs significantly Galaxy-ISW cross-correlation differs significantly for high-for high-zz SNe and offers a robust test of DGP SNe and offers a robust test of DGP gravity, independent of perturbation power gravity, independent of perturbation power spectrumspectrum