NCLB_2010_Campus_PREMIER of Lindale

8/7/2019 NCLB_2010_Campus_PREMIER of Lindale

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nclb2010campuspremier-of-lindale 1/15

Questions regarding Part I of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at (512)63-9704 or [email protected].

pecial formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).

tudent Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent.

Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.

Texas 2010 NCLB Report Card Part I – Campus Level: Student Performance for Each District and Campus Compared to the State, Percent of Students Tested, Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2008-09, 2009-10,

January 31,

For PREMIER H S OF LINDALE (221801019) RESPONSIVE EDUCATION SOLUTIONS






January 31,


Grade 10 English Language Arts

Campus % of Students Met

Standard(Proficient)

andCommended(Advanced)

District % of Students

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % of Students

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(InCampus)

Percent of Students in Campus at Eac

Achievement Level

%Not

MeetingStandard

(Basic)

%Met


%Commend(Advance

Student Group Year

All Students 2009-10 * 82 90 * * * *

Native American 2009-10 * * 91 * * * *

Asian/Pacific

Islander

2009-10

* 86 93 * * * *

African American 2009-10 * 70 86 * * * *

Hispanic 2009-10 * 82 87 * * * *

White 2009-10 * 84 94 * * * *

Female 2009-10 * 87 93 * * * *

Male 2009-10 * 76 86 * * * *

Special Education 2009-10 * 57 67 * * * *

Limited English

Proficient

2009-10* 79 50 * * * *

Economically

Disadvantaged

2009-10* 80 85 * * * *

Migrant 2009-10 * * 81 * * * *








January 31,







January 31,


Grade 10 Mathematics





MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % of Students

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(InCampus)


Achievement Level

%Not

MeetingStandard

(Basic)

%Met


%Commend(Advance

Student Group Year

All Students 2009-10 * 49 74 * * * *

Native American 2009-10 * * 74 * * * *

Asian/Pacific

Islander

2009-10

* 38 90 * * * *


Hispanic 2009-10 * 46 69 * * * *

White 2009-10 * 58 83 * * * *

Female 2009-10 * 49 74 * * * *

Male 2009-10 * 50 73 * * * *


Limited English

Proficient

2009-10* 49 42 * * * *

Economically

Disadvantaged

2009-10* 46 66 * * * *

Migrant 2009-10 * * 65 * * * *








January 31,







January 31,


Grade 10 Science





MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % of Students

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(InCampus)


Achievement Level

%Not

MeetingStandard

(Basic)

%Met


%Commend(Advance

Student Group Year

All Students 2009-10 * 57 73 * * * *

Native American 2009-10 * * 77 * * * *

Asian/Pacific

Islander

2009-10

* 75 88 * * * *


Hispanic 2009-10 * 50 65 * * * *

White 2009-10 * 70 86 * * * *

Female 2009-10 * 52 71 * * * *

Male 2009-10 * 63 75 * * * *


Limited English

Proficient

2009-10* 46 29 * * * *

Economically

Disadvantaged

2009-10* 53 63 * * * *

Migrant 2009-10 * * 55 * * * *



Questions regarding Part II a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at (5163-9704 or [email protected].


tudent Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent. Additional Academic Indicators (Graduation and Attendance Rare rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).


Texas 2010 NCLB Report Card Part II a. – Campus Level: Comparison Between Student Achievement and the State Academic Expectations asMeasured by Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

January 31,







January 31,


Reading/Language Arts

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentMet


&Commended(Advanced)

'09 Target:67%

'10 Target:73%

PercentMet



'09 Target:67%

'10 Target:73%

PercentMet



'09 Target:67%

'10 Target:73%

Campus District State Campus District State

Student Group Year

All Students 2008-09 n/a 97 99 n/a 86 88

2009-10 * 98 >99% * 88 88

Native American 2008-09 n/a >99% 99 n/a 86 91

2009-10 * >99% 99 * 80 91

Asian/Pacific Islander 2008-09 n/a >99% 99 n/a 85 95

2009-10 * >99% 99 * 97 94

African American 2008-09 n/a 99 >99% n/a 84 84

2009-10 * 99 >99% * 80 84

Hispanic 2008-09 n/a 94 99 n/a 82 85

2009-10 * 96 99 * 85 85

White 2008-09 n/a >99% >99% n/a 90 94

2009-10 * 99 >99% * 91 94

Female 2008-09 n/a 97 99 n/a 88 90

2009-10 * 98 >99% * 90 90

Male 2008-09 n/a 97 99 n/a 83 86

2009-10 * 98 99 * 84 86

Continued)








January 31,


Reading/Language Arts

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentMet



'09 Target:67%

'10 Target:73%

PercentMet



'09 Target:67%

'10 Target:73%

PercentMet



'09 Target:67%

'10 Target:73%


Student Group Year

Special Education 2008-09 n/a 99 99 n/a 70 65

2009-10 * >99% 99 * 72 66

Limited English Proficient 2008-09 n/a 90 98 n/a 79 76

2009-10 * 94 99 * 83 77

Economically Disadvantaged 2008-09 n/a 96 99 n/a 82 83

2009-10 * 97 99 * 83 83

Migrant 2008-09 n/a 86 98 n/a * 76

2009-10 * * 98 * * 75








January 31,







January 31,


Mathematics

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentMet



'09 Target:58%

'10 Target:67%

PercentMet



'09 Target:58%

'10 Target:67%

PercentMet



'09 Target:58%

'10 Target:67%


Student Group Year

All Students 2008-09 n/a >99% >99% n/a 71 81

2009-10 * 99 >99% * 78 84

Native American 2008-09 n/a >99% 99 n/a 43 83

2009-10 * >99% 99 * 62 85

Asian/Pacific Islander 2008-09 n/a >99% >99% n/a 85 94

2009-10 * >99% >99% * 94 95

African American 2008-09 n/a 99 >99% n/a 60 70

2009-10 * >99% >99% * 65 75

Hispanic 2008-09 n/a >99% >99% n/a 65 77

2009-10 * 99 >99% * 69 81

White 2008-09 n/a 99 >99% n/a 79 89

2009-10 * 99 >99% * 87 91

Female 2008-09 n/a 99 >99% n/a 69 81

2009-10 * 99 >99% * 77 84

Male 2008-09 n/a >99% >99% n/a 72 81

2009-10 * >99% >99% * 78 83

Continued)








January 31,


Mathematics

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentMet



'09 Target:58%

'10 Target:67%

PercentMet



'09 Target:58%

'10 Target:67%

PercentMet



'09 Target:58%

'10 Target:67%


Student Group Year

Special Education 2008-09 n/a >99% 99 n/a 58 57

2009-10 * >99% 99 * 62 61

Limited English Proficient 2008-09 n/a >99% 99 n/a 60 74

2009-10 * 99 >99% * 66 78

Economically Disadvantaged 2008-09 n/a 99 >99% n/a 65 75

2009-10 * 99 >99% * 70 79

Migrant 2008-09 n/a >99% 99 n/a * 70

2009-10 * * 99 * * 74








January 31,







January 31,


Additional Academic Indicators

Four-yearGraduation

Rate

'09 Target:70%

'10 Target:75%

Four-yearGraduation

Rate

'09 Target:70%

'10 Target:75%

Four-yearGraduation

Rate

'09 Target:70%

'10 Target:75%

Five-yearGraduation

Rate

'09 Target:n/a

'10 Target:80%

Five-yearGraduation

Rate

'09 Target:n/a

'10 Target:80%

Five-yeaGraduatio

Rate

'09 Targen/a

'10 Targe80%


Student Group Year

All Students 2008-09 n/a 49.7 79.1 - - -

2009-10 n/a 54.8 80.6 n/a 71.4 83.4

Native American 2008-09 n/a * 81.7 - - -

2009-10 n/a 60.0 80.3 n/a * 86.6

Asian/Pacific Islander 2008-09 n/a * 91.2 - - -

2009-10 n/a * 92.4 n/a * 94.2

African American 2008-09 n/a 51.4 71.8 - - -

2009-10 n/a 52.1 73.8 n/a 75.0 76.5

Hispanic 2008-09 n/a 41.1 70.8 - - -

2009-10 n/a 51.5 73.5 n/a 67.6 77.0

White 2008-09 n/a 65.4 88.8 - - -

2009-10 n/a 62.0 89.7 n/a 76.9 91.1

Female 2008-09 n/a 53.4 81.4 - - -

2009-10 n/a 61.0 82.9 n/a 72.2 85.0

Male 2008-09 n/a 45.3 76.8 - - -

2009-10 n/a 48.2 78.3 n/a 70.5 81.8

Special Education 2008-09 n/a 64.7 69.8 - - -

2009-10 n/a 60.0 71.8 n/a 79.8 77.3

Continued)








January 31,



Four-yearGraduation

Rate

'09 Target:70%

'10 Target:75%

Four-yearGraduation

Rate

'09 Target:70%

'10 Target:75%

Four-yearGraduation

Rate

'09 Target:70%

'10 Target:75%

Five-yearGraduation

Rate

'09 Target:n/a

'10 Target:80%

Five-yearGraduation

Rate

'09 Target:n/a

'10 Target:80%

Five-yeaGraduatio

Rate

'09 Targen/a

'10 Targe80%


Student Group Year

Limited English Proficient 2008-09 n/a 36.0 44.2 - - -

2009-10 n/a 52.3 56.9 n/a 67.0 63.8

Economically Disadvantaged 2008-09 n/a 45.9 70.4 - - -

2009-10 n/a 50.5 78.3 n/a 70.0 76.6

Migrant 2008-09 n/a - 66.3 - - -

2009-10 n/a 100.0 69.3 n/a * 72.3








January 31,







January 31,



AttendanceRate

Target:90%

AttendanceRate

Target:90%

AttendanceRate

Target:90%

Campus District State

Student Group Year

All Students 2008-09 n/a n/a 95.5

2009-10 n/a n/a 95.6

Native American 2008-09 n/a n/a 94.8

2009-10 n/a n/a 95.0

Asian/Pacific Islander 2008-09 n/a n/a 97.5

2009-10 n/a n/a 97.5

African American 2008-09 n/a n/a 95.1

2009-10 n/a n/a 95.2

Hispanic 2008-09 n/a n/a 95.4

2009-10 n/a n/a 95.5

White 2008-09 n/a n/a 95.6

2009-10 n/a n/a 95.7

Female 2008-09 n/a n/a 95.52009-10 n/a n/a 95.6

Male 2008-09 n/a n/a 95.5

2009-10 n/a n/a 95.6

Special Education 2008-09 n/a n/a 94.0

2009-10 n/a n/a 94.1

Limited English Proficient 2008-09 n/a n/a 96.4

2009-10 n/a n/a 96.5

Economically Disadvantaged 2008-09 n/a n/a 95.2

2009-10 n/a n/a 95.3

Continued)








January 31,



AttendanceRate

Target:90%

AttendanceRate

Target:90%

AttendanceRate

Target:90%

Campus District State

Student Group Year

Migrant 2008-09 n/a n/a 94.1

2009-10 n/a n/a 94.1



Questions regarding Part III of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at (51263-9704 or [email protected].

n/a' indicates the district or school does not receive Title I, Part A funds.


Texas 2010 NCLB Report Card Part III - Campus Level: Information on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and School Improvement Program (SIfor Districts and Campuses Receiving Title I, Part A funds

January 31,


Questions regarding Part III of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at (51263-9704 or [email protected].

n/a' indicates the district or school does not receive Title I, Part A funds.


Texas 2010 NCLB Report Card Part III - Campus Level: Information on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and School Improvement Program (SIfor Districts and Campuses Receiving Title I, Part A funds

January 31,


Met AYP

SIP(for the

subsequentschoolyear)

Year

2008-09 Not Evaluated NONE

2009-10 Not Evaluated NONE



Questions regarding Part IV a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of NCLB Program Coordination. Contact u512) 463-9374 or [email protected].

A dash (-) indicates data are not reported; 'n/a' indicates that the data are not available or applicable.

Percentages reported by Teacher Degree may not sum to 100% either or due to rounding or because the category “teachers with no degs not reported.

Percent of Teachers are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).


Texas 2010 NCLB Report Card Part IV a. - Campus Level: Professional Qualifications of All Public Elementary and Secondary Teachers, AsDefined by the State (Teacher Degree)

January 31,


Questions regarding Part IV a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of NCLB Program Coordination. Contact u512) 463-9374 or [email protected].


Percentages reported by Teacher Degree may not sum to 100% either or due to rounding or because the category “teachers with no degs not reported.

Percent of Teachers are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).


Texas 2010 NCLB Report Card Part IV a. - Campus Level: Professional Qualifications of All Public Elementary and Secondary Teachers, AsDefined by the State (Teacher Degree)

January 31,


Bachelors Masters Doctorate

Year

2008-09 100.0 0.0 0.0

2009-10 100.0 0.0 0.0



Questions regarding Part IV b. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of NCLB Program Coordination. Contact u512) 463-9374 or [email protected].


Percent of Teachers are rounded to the nearest one-hundredth of a percent (two decimal places).


Texas 2010 NCLB Report Card Part IV b. - Campus Level: Percent of Public Elementary and Secondary Teachers With Emergency/Provisional Credentials

January 31,


Questions regarding Part IV b. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of NCLB Program Coordination. Contact u512) 463-9374 or [email protected].


Percent of Teachers are rounded to the nearest one-hundredth of a percent (two decimal places).


Texas 2010 NCLB Report Card Part IV b. - Campus Level: Percent of Public Elementary and Secondary Teachers With Emergency/Provisional Credentials

January 31,


%

Year

2008-09 0.00

2009-10 0.00



Questions regarding Part IV c of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of NCLB Program Coordination Contact u


Percent of Classes are rounded to the nearest one-hundredth of a percent (two decimal places).


Texas 2010 NCLB Report Card Part IV c. - Campus Level: Percent of Classes Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers

January 31,


Questions regarding Part IV c of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of NCLB Program Coordination Contact u


Percent of Classes are rounded to the nearest one-hundredth of a percent (two decimal places).


Texas 2010 NCLB Report Card Part IV c. - Campus Level: Percent of Classes Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers

January 31,


%

Year

2008-09 0.00

2009-10 0.00

NCLB_2010_Campus_PREMIER of Lindale

Documents