One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation Navigation Lock and Dam Inspection and Emergency Repairs Workshop ERDC Vicksburg, Mississippi 18-20 April 2006 Methodology for Assessing Methodology for Assessing Concrete Condition for Concrete Condition for Rehabilitation at LaGrange Lock Rehabilitation at LaGrange Lock Anne M. Werner, Ph.D., P.E. Anne M. Werner, Ph.D., P.E. Rock Island District Rock Island District
23
Embed
Navigation Lock and Dam Inspection and Emergency Repairs Workshop ERDC Vicksburg, Mississippi
Navigation Lock and Dam Inspection and Emergency Repairs Workshop ERDC Vicksburg, Mississippi 18-20 April 2006. Methodology for Assessing Concrete Condition for Rehabilitation at LaGrange Lock Anne M. Werner, Ph.D., P.E. Rock Island District. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation
Navigation Lock and Dam Inspection and Emergency Repairs Workshop
ERDC Vicksburg, Mississippi
18-20 April 2006
Methodology for AssessingMethodology for AssessingConcrete Condition for Rehabilitation Concrete Condition for Rehabilitation
at LaGrange Lockat LaGrange Lock
Anne M. Werner, Ph.D., P.E.Anne M. Werner, Ph.D., P.E.Rock Island DistrictRock Island District
One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation
Methodology for Assessing Concrete Condition for Rehabilitation
INSPECTION JUSTIFY FUNDINGREPAIR/REHAB? FUND?
One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation
Methodology for Assessing Concrete Condition for Rehabilitation
INSPECTION JUSTIFY FUNDINGREPAIR/REHAB? FUND?
One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation
Inspection – LaGrange Lock
INSPECTION
One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation
Repair/Rehab?
REPAIR/
REHAB?
One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation
Justify Funding - RER
Rehabilitation is intended to improve reliability of an existing structure;
Rehabilitation must be economically justified by benefit-cost analysis;
Economic analysis must include probabilistic life-cycle simulation with setbacks for repairs and rehabilitation.
JUSTIFY FUNDING
One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation
Justify Funding - RER
EP 1130-2-500 Project Operations - Partners and Support (Work Management Guidance and Procedures) provides guidance for RERs
Allows subjective probability (Expert Elicitation) to calculate probability of unsatisfactory performance
JUSTIFY FUNDING
One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation
Expert Elicitation
Should only be used when? Who are the experts? Model is still required.
4 Components• Land Wall Concrete• River Wall Concrete• Upper Miter Concrete• Lower Miter Concrete
One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation
Elicitation Process
COMPONENT
SATISFACTORYPERFORMANCE
UNSATISFACTORYPERFORMANCE
MINOR
CATASTROPHIC
MAJOR
SEVERE
MINOR SETBACK
CATASTROPHICSETBACK
MAJOR SETBACK
SEVERE SETBACK
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3
One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation
Elicitation Process
Step 1: Determine the performance probability, P, of an unsatisfactory performance for component• determined over time - 1939, 2004, 2029, 2054• unsatisfactory performance means the component
has failed to perform properly and causes adverse impacts to the capability of the lock and navigation
COMPONENT
UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation
Elicitation Process
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060
YEAR
PRO
BA
BIL
ITY
OF
UN
SAT
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E
One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation
Elicitation Process
Step 2: Given an unsatisfactory performance, determine the conditional probabilities, p1, p2, p3 and p4, of the resulting potential consequences• minor, major, severe, catastrophic• conditional probabilities together must add up to 1 (or
100%)
UNSATISFACTORYPERFORMANCE
MINOR
CATASTROPHIC
MAJOR
SEVERE
One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation
Elicitation Process
Step 3: Given an unsatisfactory performance has occurred and repairs have been made, determine the setback, P, to the future probability of unsatisfactory performance.• determine for all consequences (minor, major,
severe and catastrophic)• determines the effect of repairs to the lock
UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE
MINOR
CATASTROPHIC
MAJOR
SEVERE
MINOR SETBACK
CATASTROPHIC SETBACK
MAJOR SETBACK
SEVERE SETBACK
One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation
Elicitation ResultsProbability of Unstisfactory Performance Vs. Time
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
Time (Years)
PUP
(%)
PUP PUP w/ Setbacks Rand Number
One Corps Serving the Armed Forces and the Nation
Elicitation Results
Repair costs = $8.4M Closure time costs = $90.4M Concrete rehabilitation was recommended by expert
panel New method for determining setbacks Optional elicitation methods explored Better understanding of the process
Iterations: 10000Years: 25
Upper Miter Lower Miter Land Wall River Wall TotalsAvg 25 years Avg 1 Year Avg 25 years Avg 1 Year Avg 25 years Avg 1 Year Avg 25 years Avg 1 Year