Page 1
Naturgy Energy Group S.A.
Primary Credit Analyst:
Massimo Schiavo, Paris + 33 14 420 6718; [email protected]
Secondary Contacts:
Claire Mauduit-Le Clercq, Paris + 33 14 420 7201; [email protected]
Gonzalo Cantabrana Fernandez, Madrid (34) 91 389 6955; [email protected]
Pierre Georges, Paris (33) 1-4420-6735; [email protected]
Table Of Contents
Credit Highlights
Outlook
Our Base-Case Scenario
Company Description
Business Risk
Financial Risk
Liquidity
Environmental, Social, And Governance
Issue Ratings--Subordination Risk Analysis
Reconciliation
Ratings Score Snapshot
Related Criteria
www.spglobal.com/ratingsdirect April 23, 2019 1
Page 2
Naturgy Energy Group S.A.
Business Risk: STRONG
Vulnerable Excellent
Financial Risk: SIGNIFICANT
Highly leveraged Minimal
bbb bbb bbb
Anchor Modifiers Group/Gov't
Issuer Credit Rating
BBB/Stable/A-2
Credit Highlights
Overview
Key Strengths Key Risks
High share of low-risk regulated gas and power distribution activities in
Spain and Latin America, generating stable and predictable cash flows.
Aggressive shareholding structure, with 40% of share capital owned by
infrastructure and private equity funds.
Good geographic and group diversification, mainly linked to operations
growth in the international liquefied natural gas (LNG) midstream
sector and in Latin America.
Reduced capital expenditures (capex) in the 2018-2022 strategic plan,
with cost-cutting potentially compromising longer-term cash flow
generation.
Industrial and commercial integration of electricity and gas business in
Spain.
One of the most aggressive dividend policies among Europe's largest
integrated utilities.
Strong liquidity, supported by a conservative 24-month prefunding
policy.
Gas, power, and service sales and international LNG (about 33% of 2018
EBITDA), could suffer as a result of a weak operational performance
and increasing competition.
Naturgy Energy Group S.A.'s (Naturgy's) cashflows are stable and predictable thanks to its fully regulated electricity
and gas distribution activities (67% of 2018 EBITDA). The company's credit profile benefits from a higher contribution
from fully regulated activities in Spain, Latin, and Central America than for other European integrated utility players.
Naturgy's gas, power, service sales, and international LNG (about 33% of 2018 EBITDA) continue to suffer as a result
of a weak operating performance and increasing competition. Despite strong results in 2018 thanks to lower
procurement costs and better pricing environment in LNG, we see some potential long-term risks of underperformance
in the business division. Naturgy is a relatively small player in LNG, thus not fully benefiting from economies of scale
and vertical integration in the gas value chain, and is exposed to gas price fluctuations in the service sales business.
Naturgy stands out among European integrated utilities due to the relatively low contribution of renewable assets to its
current generation portfolio.Although the company plans to double its exposure to renewables over 2018-2022 by
adding an additional 1 gigawatt (GW) of installed capacity, Naturgy is more focused on providing the base load with
combined cycle gas turbines (CCGTs).
The company's aggressive dividend policy, reduced capex in the 2018-2022 strategic plan, and cost-cutting could
compromise longer-term cash flow generation.Naturgy's dividend policy stands out as one of the most aggressive
amongst the European integrated utilities, based on dividends per share (DPS), with Naturgy targeting €2 billion of
shares buyback over 2018-2022, absent meaningful investment opportunities.
www.spglobal.com/ratingsdirect April 23, 2019 2
Page 3
40% of Naturgy's share capital is owned by infrastructure and private equity funds.Two of Naturgy's main
shareholders are Rioja Bidco Shareholdings (20.1%), which is 75% and 25% owned by CVC and Corporación
Financiera Alba respectively, and Global Infrastructure partners (20%).
Outlook: Stable
S&P Global Ratings' stable outlook on Spain-based vertically integrated gas and electricity utility Naturgy
incorporates our expectation that, over 2019-2020, the company will maintain funds from operations (FFO) to debt
of over 18%. We also consider the group's commitment to cost-cutting, which should compensate for the
aggressive and inflexible shareholder remuneration policy established as part of the 2018-2022 strategic plan.
Downside scenario
We could downgrade Naturgy if its adjusted FFO to debt does not remain above 18% over 2019-2020, or if its
operating performance deteriorates. The fixed and aggressive dividend policy over 2018-2022 leaves Naturgy
limited headroom for underperformance. We will closely monitor, in particular, Naturgy's performance in gas,
power, service sales, and the LNG businesses, given the company's weak results in the past.
In our base case, we don't anticipate sizable debt-financed acquisitions. We will closely monitor the evolution of
the company's strategy and the potential impact of the company's plan on capital structure optimization.
Upside scenario
We could consider a positive rating action if the group's adjusted FFO to debt improved sustainably to more than
20% over 2019-2020, combined with a good operating performance. Any positive action will ultimately depend on
Naturgy's successful execution of operating efficiencies outlined in the 2018-2022 strategic plan.
Our Base-Case Scenario
www.spglobal.com/ratingsdirect April 23, 2019 3
Naturgy Energy Group S.A.
Page 4
Assumptions Key Metrics
• Improving macroeconomic conditions in countries
where Naturgy operates. In particular, we expect
continued real GDP growth in Spain, Chile, and
Mexico at a rate above or close to 2% over
2019-2021. In Brazil, while growth should remain
subdued in 2018, we expect real GDP will increase
by more than 2% over 2019-2021.
• Power prices will improve in Spain, but remain
below €55 per megawatt hour (MWh) for 2019-2020.
Cash flow generation will remain supported by
Naturgy's high share of regulated activities.
• Revenues remaining about stable over 2019-2021.
• Average EBITDA margins of about 19% over
2019-2021.
• Proceeds of about €350 million from disposals in
2019.
• Capex averaging €1.6 billion over 2019-2021.
• Dividends, including to minority shareholders,
averaging €1.8 billion over 2019-2021.
• Average interest rate on debt of about 3.1% in 2018,
versus 3.4% in 2017, and averaging 3.2% over
2019-2021.
• No operational underperformance compared with
targets outlined in the 2018-2022 business plan.
• Negative free cash flow after capex and dividends
over 2019-2021.
2018a 2019e 2020e 2021e
EBITDA (bil. €) 4.1 4.5-4.6 4.6-4.8 4.6-4.8
Debt (bil. €) 17.3 17.3-17.5 17.6-17.8 17.8-18.0
Dividends (bil. €) 2.0 1.7-1.8 1.7-1.8 1.8-1.9
Capex (bil. €) 1.8 1.7-1.8 1.4-1.5 1.3-1.4
FFO to debt (%) 18.2 18.0-19.0 18.5-19.5 18.0-19.0
Debt to EBITDA (x) 4.2 3.7-4.0 3.7-4.0 3.7-4.0
* All figures are S&P Global Ratings adjusted.
a--Actual. e—Estimate
Base-Case Projections
Naturgy's adjusted EBITDA in 2018 was at €4.1 billion versus our expectation of €4.3 billion due to
higher-than-expected capture costs (€180 million) resulting from implementation of the efficiency plan.In 2018, DPS
increased by 30% to €1.30 per share and Naturgy also invested €121 million in buying back shares as part of its €400
million annual buy-back to be completed by the end of June 2019. S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt decreased to
about €17.3 billion from €18.3 billion in 2017 thanks to about €1.5 billion of disposals. As a result, adjusted FFO to
debt was 18.2%, compared with 14.8% in 2017. In 2019, Naturgy expects reported EBITDA of about €4.6 billion.
Company Description
Spain-based Naturgy is a vertically integrated utility with leading positions in the gas and power value chain in Spain
and Latin America. Naturgy supplies gas and electricity to almost 22 million customers in over 30 countries.
www.spglobal.com/ratingsdirect April 23, 2019 4
Naturgy Energy Group S.A.
Page 5
In Spain, Naturgy is the incumbent gas utility. It is the largest gas distribution operator, with more than 5.4 million gas
distribution points in 2018. It is also the third-largest electricity distributor, after Endesa and Iberdrola, with more than
3.7 million electricity distribution points in 2018.
Naturgy is the largest wholesale and retail supplier of natural gas, with more than 197,000 gigawatt hours (GWh) of gas
supplied in 2018 (versus more than 195,000 GWh in 2017). It is also one of the largest power generators in Spain, with
28,307GWh of electricity generated in 2018 (versus 27,953 GWh in 2017) and more than 80% of the generation
portfolio coming CCGT plants and coal. In Latin America, Naturgy is the largest electricity distribution and
transmission company and one of the leading gas distributors in Chile. It also enjoys a top-tier position in Brazil in gas
distribution and supply.
Naturgy is also active in the LNG business; its fleet of LNG carriers had a capacity of 1.2 billion cubic meters (bcm) in
2018, which increased from 1.0 bcm in 2017.
In 2018, Naturgy reported revenues of €24.3 billion and EBITDA of €4.0 billion.
Chart 1
www.spglobal.com/ratingsdirect April 23, 2019 5
Naturgy Energy Group S.A.
Page 6
Chart 2
www.spglobal.com/ratingsdirect April 23, 2019 6
Naturgy Energy Group S.A.
Page 7
Chart 3
Business Risk: Strong
Naturgy's strong business risk profile hinges on the group's sizable share of low-risk regulated gas and electricity
activities, its resilient business model, international diversification, and flexible international gas midstream operations.
Naturgy continues to suffer from weak, albeit improving gas supply margins, as highlighted by the 2018 results.
The high share of predictable regulated network earnings supports stability
More than 60% of Naturgy's earnings come from regulated activities, about half of which are in Spain and the rest in
South America, mainly Chile. Although we view the regulatory frameworks in South America as somewhat weaker
than in Spain, we view Naturgy's diversification and operating efficiency favorably, in particular since Naturgy took
over Compania General de Electricidad (CGE) in Chile, a country we regard as having a stable and transparent
regulatory framework.
In Chile, gas distribution operations enjoy a real return cap of 9% after tax. Electricity transmission and distribution
activities have four-year regulatory periods, regulated real remuneration on investments of 10% before tax, and the
pass-through of energy costs.
www.spglobal.com/ratingsdirect April 23, 2019 7
Naturgy Energy Group S.A.
Page 8
In Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico, distribution-operation tariffs are not exposed to commodity-price, transport, or
local-inflation risk. Regulatory periods span five years, providing good earnings visibility. In Argentina, the integral
tariff review was implemented in April 2018. We view the Argentinian regulatory framework weaker than that of the
rest of Naturgy's regulated activities in the region.
Generation activities in Spain remain challenging
Naturgy's business risk profile is somewhat hampered by its material exposure to the Spanish gas and electricity
markets. About 10% of estimated 2019 earnings come from Spanish power generation activities, which are exposed to
weak and declining power prices. Power prices will likely remain below 55€/MWh, according to S&P Global Platts.
Naturgy stands out among European integrated utilities due to the relatively low contribution of renewable assets to its
generation portfolio. The company was awarded 926 MW of renewable capacity to be built before January 2020 in the
2016-2017 renewables auctions in Spain. However, as highlighted in the report "The End To Subsidies: The Beginning
Of A New Era For Spanish Renewables?", published Feb. 7, 2018, on RatingsDirect, the remuneration scheme for the
recently awarded renewables is much weaker than what we have seen so far in Europe.
Naturgy's generation portfolio is more carbon dioxide (CO2)-intensive than some other integrated peers, and we
therefore might see the company increasingly involved in renewable projects at a global level over the next three
years.
Chart 4
www.spglobal.com/ratingsdirect April 23, 2019 8
Naturgy Energy Group S.A.
Page 9
Peer comparisonTable 1
Naturgy Energy Group S.A.--Peer Comparison
Industry Sector: Energy
Naturgy Energy Group
S.A.
EDP - Energias de Portugal
S.A. Enel SpA Iberdrola S.A.
Rating as of April 23, 2019 BBB/Stable/A-2 BBB-/Stable/A-3 BBB+/Stable/A-2 BBB+/Stable/A-2
--Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2018-- --Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2017--
(Mil. €)
Revenues 24,339.0 15,278.1 74,437.0 31,263.3
EBITDA 4,127.5 3,207.0 14,993.0 7,482.2
FFO 3,150.3 2,455.1 8,724.5 5,898.3
Interest Expense 673.2 708.6 2,469.5 1,279.1
Cash Interest Paid 714.2 686.9 4,689.5 1,041.7
Cash flow from operations 2,949.3 2,398.2 10,366.5 5,030.1
Capital expenditures 1,800.0 1,674.9 8,499.0 6,259.4
Free operating cash flow 1,149.3 723.3 1,867.5 (1,229.3)
Discretionary cash flow (1,107.7) (156.1) (1,616.0) (2,526.2)
Cash and short-term
investments
1,696.0 1,720.3 6,781.7 3,205.1
Debt 17,293.1 18,147.4 45,244.4 37,439.9
Equity 13,734.0 13,275.3 54,314.5 42,185.9
Adjusted ratios
EBITDA margin (%) 17.0 21.0 20.1 23.9
Return on capital (%) 4.8 5.5 10.5 5.4
EBITDA interest coverage (x) 6.1 4.5 6.1 5.8
FFO cash interest coverage (x) 5.4 4.6 2.9 6.7
Debt/EBITDA (x) 4.2 5.7 3.0 5.0
FFO/debt (%) 18.2 13.5 19.3 15.8
Cash flow from
operations/debt (%)
17.1 13.2 22.9 13.4
Free operating cash flow/debt
(%)
6.6 4.0 4.1 (3.3)
Discretionary cash flow/debt
(%)
(6.4) (0.9) (3.6) (6.7)
Compared with peers Enel, EDP, and Iberdrola, Naturgy enjoys a higher portion of EBITDA from fully regulated power
and gas networks activities, which represented more than 65% of 2018 EBITDA. In the case of Enel and Iberdrola they
represented more than 50%, and for EDP, about 30%.
Compared with the aforementioned peers, Naturgy has a more aggressive shareholders' remuneration, which is based
on increased DPS over 2018-2022, coupled with share-buyback in the amount of €2 billion in the same time period,
absent significant investment opportunities. In the case of Enel, EDP, and Iberdrola, it is based on payout ratio, which
is at 70% over 2019-2021 for Enel, 75%-85% for EDP, and 65%-75% for Iberdrola.
www.spglobal.com/ratingsdirect April 23, 2019 9
Naturgy Energy Group S.A.
Page 10
Financial Risk: Significant
We forecast that, over the next three years, Naturgy will maintain FFO to debt at 18% or higher. In its 2018-2022
strategic plan Naturgy has outlined the most aggressive dividend policy among Europe's integrated utilities. In 2019,
we expect Naturgy will pay out a total of about €1.8 billion in dividends (including to minority shareholders),
compared with about €2.0 billion in 2018. More generally, the dividend per share will increase to €1.3 per share in
2018 from €1.0 per share in 2017 and then gradually increase to €1.59 per share in 2022. Over 2018-2022, we expect
the dividend-to-capex ratio will average 1.0x, which is below that of the other integrated utilities we rate in Europe.
Chart 5
www.spglobal.com/ratingsdirect April 23, 2019 10
Naturgy Energy Group S.A.
Page 11
Chart 6 Chart 7
Financial summaryTable 2
Naturgy Energy Group S.A.--Yearly Data
Industry Sector: Energy
--Fiscal year ended Dec. 31--
2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
(Mil. €)
Revenues 24,339.0 23,306.0 23,184.0 26,015.0 27,828.0
EBITDA 4,127.5 3,920.5 4,771.5 5,075.0 5,120.5
FFO 3,150.3 2,712.9 3,367.4 3,506.1 3,427.9
Interest Expense 673.2 737.6 907.1 986.9 1,016.6
Cash Interest Paid 714.2 772.6 879.1 973.9 944.6
Cash flow from operations 2,949.3 2,816.9 3,389.4 3,392.1 2,746.6
Capital expenditures 1,800.0 1,766.0 2,135.0 1,767.0 1,453.3
Free operating cash flow 1,149.3 1,050.9 1,254.4 1,625.1 1,293.3
Discretionary cash flow (1,107.7) (203.1) (268.6) 578.6 46.7
Cash and short-term investments 1,696.0 3,215.9 2,067.0 2,390.0 3,572.0
Gross available cash 1,696.0 3,215.9 2,067.0 2,390.0 3,572.0
Debt 17,293.1 18,329.8 18,853.4 18,645.7 20,243.1
Equity 13,734.0 17,444.0 18,144.0 17,658.0 16,773.5
Adjusted ratios
EBITDA margin (%) 17.0 16.8 20.6 19.5 18.4
Return on capital (%) 4.8 5.6 7.7 9.0 10.2
EBITDA interest coverage (x) 6.1 5.3 5.3 5.1 5.0
FFO cash interest coverage (x) 5.4 4.5 4.8 4.6 4.6
Debt/EBITDA (x) 4.2 4.7 4.0 3.7 4.0
www.spglobal.com/ratingsdirect April 23, 2019 11
Naturgy Energy Group S.A.
Page 12
Table 2
Naturgy Energy Group S.A.--Yearly Data (cont.)
Industry Sector: Energy
--Fiscal year ended Dec. 31--
2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
(Mil. €)
FFO/debt (%) 18.2 14.8 17.9 18.8 16.9
Cash flow from operations/debt (%) 17.1 15.4 18.0 18.2 13.6
Free operating cash flow/debt (%) 6.6 5.7 6.7 8.7 6.4
Discretionary cash flow/debt (%) (6.4) (1.1) (1.4) 3.1 0.2
FFO--Funds from operations.
Liquidity: Strong
We view Naturgy's liquidity as strong, given its proactive financing and healthy cash flow generation. We estimate that
the company's sources of liquidity will exceed projected uses by more than 1.5x over the next 12 months, and by more
than 1.0x over the next 24 months.
Our assessment of Naturgy's liquidity is further supported by the company's sound banking relationships, prudent
financial discipline, and proven access to the international debt capital markets.
Principal Liquidity Sources Principal Liquidity Uses
We anticipate the following principal liquidity sources
for the 12 months started in Dec. 31, 2018:
• Reported access to about €1.7 billion in unrestricted
cash, of which more than 85% is at the parent
company;
• Access to about €5.0 billion under available
committed credit facilities, maturing in more than
one year; and
• Forecast cash FFO of approximately €3.3 billion in
the next 12 months.
We anticipate the following principal liquidity uses
over the same time period:
• Capex of about €2.0 billion;
• Debt maturities of about €2 billion;
• Working capital outflows of about €150 million; and
• Dividends of about €1.8 billion.
Debt Maturities
www.spglobal.com/ratingsdirect April 23, 2019 12
Naturgy Energy Group S.A.
Page 13
Chart 7
www.spglobal.com/ratingsdirect April 23, 2019 13
Naturgy Energy Group S.A.
Page 14
Environmental, Social, And Governance
From an environmental standpoint, Naturgy's generation portfolio compares unfavorably with those of other
European integrated utilities due to the relatively low contribution of renewable assets and its relatively high CO2
intensity (more than 80% generated from CCGT plants and coal). The company was awarded 926 MW of
renewable capacity to be built before January 2020 in the 2016-2017 renewables auctions in Spain, but the
company still lags behind its European peers. We believe its long-term position is, however, linked to the future
relevance of gas.
Naturgy's ownership structure and governance has changed radically over the past two years, with investment
funds (Global Infrastructure Partners and CVC) now majority shareholders. We believe this has materially changed
the company's operating model and financial policy to be increasingly skewed toward shareholders. We believe
this could translate into accrued social risks over time. We note a reduction in capex in the new 2018-2022
strategic plan, and believe cost-cutting could compromise the quality of network services and overall longer-term
cash flow generation. In addition, Naturgy's 140 managers benefit from a new five-year (2018-2022) Long Term
Incentive Plan, which is based on total shareholders' return (share price appreciation plus dividends paid over the
period of the strategic plan), and replaces the previous annual scheme that was dependent on operational targets.
As a result, this new plan might lead the management to opt for shareholder's remuneration maximization, which
could impair the company's longer-term cash flow generation.
Furthermore, we see increasing scrutiny from network regulators regarding the balance of interest between
stakeholders, which Naturgy may be penalized for over time. In Spain, the regulator is proposing the introduction
of leverage limitations, while in Colombia Naturgy is in a legal dispute with the government, which decided to take
over the management of the power distribution company Eletricaribe at the end of 2016. In the summer of 2016,
Naturgy notified Colombian authorities of a likely controversy in light of an international agreement of mutual
investments between Spain and Colombia, due to the debt accumulated with subsidiary Electricaribe, of which the
Spanish company owned an 85% share.
Issue Ratings--Subordination Risk Analysis
Capital structure
Naturgy's policy is to issue all debt at the parent company via its financial subsidiaries, and lend the proceeds to its
operating companies. Our calculation of structural subordination is at about 20% (compared with 11% in 2017),
however, because of the amount of operating debt at the subsidiaries. As part of its 2018-2022 strategic plan, Naturgy
will probably increase (or "push down") the amount of debt at the subsidiaries' level, which we will continue to
monitor. We believe that Naturgy's size, diversity of cash flow generation, and direct ownership of a significant amount
of operating assets may be a strong mitigating factor to structural subordination issues.
Analytical conclusions
The issue rating on Naturgy's senior unsecured debt is 'BBB', in line with the issuer credit rating, since currently no
significant elements of subordination risk are present in the capital structure.
www.spglobal.com/ratingsdirect April 23, 2019 14
Naturgy Energy Group S.A.
Page 15
Reconciliation
Table 3
Reconciliation Of Naturgy Energy Group S.A. Reported Amounts With S&P Global Ratings' AdjustedAmounts (Mil. €)
--Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2018--
Naturgy Energy Group S.A. reported amounts
Debt
Shareholders'
equity EBITDA
Operating
income
Interest
expense
S&P
Adjusted
EBITDA
Cash flow
from
operations Dividends
Capital
Expenditures
15,431.0 10,948.0 3,840.0 (2,167) 557.0 4,127.5 2,881.0 1,976.0 1,808.0
S&P Global Ratings' adjustments
Cash taxes paid -- -- -- -- -- (263) -- -- --
Cash taxes paid -
Other
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Cash Interest Paid -- -- -- -- -- (621) -- -- --
Operating leases 888.3 -- 161.5 55.2 55.2 (55.2) 106.3 -- --
Debt-like hybrids 110.0 (110) -- -- 2.0 (1) (1) (1) --
Intermediate hybrids
reported as equity
751.0 (751) -- -- 29.0 (29) (29) (29) --
Postretirement
benefit
obligations/deferred
compensation
221.0 -- -- -- 15.0 -- -- -- --
Accessible Cash &
Liquid Investments
(1,696.0) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Capitalized interest -- -- -- -- 8.0 (8) (8) -- (8)
Share-based
compensation
expense
-- -- 5.0 -- -- -- -- -- --
Dividends received
from equity
investments
-- -- 184.0 -- -- -- -- -- --
Asset retirement
obligations
285.8 -- -- -- 7.0 -- -- -- --
Non-operating
income (expense)
-- -- -- (477) -- -- -- -- --
Non-controlling
Interest/Minority
interest
-- 3,647.0 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Debt - Derivatives (85) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Debt - Lease
Liabilities Not
Included in
Reported Debt
1,318.0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Debt - Put options
on minority stakes
69.0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
EBITDA -
Gain/(Loss) on
disposals of PP&E
-- -- (21) (21) -- -- -- -- --
EBITDA - Other -- -- (42) (42) -- -- -- -- --
www.spglobal.com/ratingsdirect April 23, 2019 15
Naturgy Energy Group S.A.
Page 16
Table 3
Reconciliation Of Naturgy Energy Group S.A. Reported Amounts With S&P Global Ratings' AdjustedAmounts (Mil. €) (cont.)
D&A - Impairment
charges/(reversals)
-- -- -- 4,270.0 -- -- -- -- --
Total adjustments 1,862.1 2,786.0 287.5 3,785.2 116.2 (977.2) 68.3 (30.0) (8.0)
S&P Global Ratings' adjusted amounts
Debt Equity EBITDA EBIT
Interest
expense
Funds
from
operations
Cash flow
from
operations
Dividends
paid
Capital
expenditures
17,293.1 13,734.0 4,127.5 1,618.2 673.2 3,150.3 2,949.3 1,946.0 1,800.0
Ratings Score Snapshot
Issuer Credit Rating
BBB/Stable/A-2
Business risk: Strong
• Country risk: Intermediate
• Industry risk: Low
• Competitive position: Strong
Financial risk: Significant
Anchor: bbb
Modifiers
• Diversification/Portfolio effect: Neutral (no impact)
• Capital structure: Neutral (no impact)
• Financial policy: Neutral (no impact)
• Liquidity: Strong (no impact)
• Management and governance: Satisfactory (no impact)
• Comparable rating analysis: Neutral (no impact)
Stand-alone credit profile : bbb
• Group credit profile: bbb
• Related government rating: A-
Related Criteria
• Criteria - Corporates - General: Reflecting Subordination Risk In Corporate Issue Ratings, March 28, 2018
• General Criteria: Methodology And Assumptions: Assigning Equity Content To Hybrid Capital Instruments Issued
By Corporate Entities And Other Issuers Not Subject To Prudential Regulation, Jan. 16, 2018
www.spglobal.com/ratingsdirect April 23, 2019 16
Naturgy Energy Group S.A.
Page 17
• General Criteria: Methodology For Linking Long-Term And Short-Term Ratings, April 7, 2017
• Criteria | Corporates | General: Methodology And Assumptions: Liquidity Descriptors For Global Corporate
Issuers, Dec. 16, 2014
• Criteria - Corporates - Industrials: Key Credit Factors For The Unregulated Power And Gas Industry, March 28,
2014
• Criteria | Corporates | Industrials: Key Credit Factors For The Midstream Energy Industry, Dec. 19, 2013
• Criteria | Corporates | General: Corporate Methodology: Ratios And Adjustments, Nov. 19, 2013
• General Criteria: Group Rating Methodology, Nov. 19, 2013
• General Criteria: Methodology: Industry Risk, Nov. 19, 2013
• Criteria - Corporates - Utilities: Key Credit Factors For The Regulated Utilities Industry, Nov. 19, 2013
• General Criteria: Country Risk Assessment Methodology And Assumptions, Nov. 19, 2013
• Criteria | Corporates | General: Corporate Methodology, Nov. 19, 2013
• General Criteria: Methodology: Management And Governance Credit Factors For Corporate Entities And Insurers,
Nov. 13, 2012
• General Criteria: Criteria Clarification On Hybrid Capital Step-Ups, Call Options, And Replacement Provisions, Oct.
22, 2012
• Criteria | Financial Institutions | General: Methodology: Hybrid Capital Issue Features: Update On Dividend
Stoppers, Look-Backs, And Pushers, Feb. 10, 2010
• General Criteria: Use Of CreditWatch And Outlooks, Sept. 14, 2009
• Criteria | Insurance | General: Hybrid Capital Handbook: September 2008 Edition, Sept. 15, 2008
Business And Financial Risk Matrix
Business Risk Profile
Financial Risk Profile
Minimal Modest Intermediate Significant Aggressive Highly leveraged
Excellent aaa/aa+ aa a+/a a- bbb bbb-/bb+
Strong aa/aa- a+/a a-/bbb+ bbb bb+ bb
Satisfactory a/a- bbb+ bbb/bbb- bbb-/bb+ bb b+
Fair bbb/bbb- bbb- bb+ bb bb- b
Weak bb+ bb+ bb bb- b+ b/b-
Vulnerable bb- bb- bb-/b+ b+ b b-
Ratings Detail (As Of April 23, 2019)*
Naturgy Energy Group S.A.
Issuer Credit Rating BBB/Stable/A-2
Issuer Credit Ratings History
28-Nov-2013 BBB/Stable/A-2
15-Oct-2012 BBB/Negative/A-2
www.spglobal.com/ratingsdirect April 23, 2019 17
Naturgy Energy Group S.A.
Page 18
Ratings Detail (As Of April 23, 2019)*(cont.)
17-Dec-2010 BBB/Stable/A-2
Related Entities
Naturgy Mexico S.A. de C.V.
Issuer Credit Rating
CaVal (Mexico) National Scale mxAA+/Stable/--
Senior UnsecuredCaVal (Mexico) National Scale mxAA+
*Unless otherwise noted, all ratings in this report are global scale ratings. S&P Global Ratings’ credit ratings on the global scale are comparable
across countries. S&P Global Ratings’ credit ratings on a national scale are relative to obligors or obligations within that specific country. Issue and
debt ratings could include debt guaranteed by another entity, and rated debt that an entity guarantees.
www.spglobal.com/ratingsdirect April 23, 2019 18
Naturgy Energy Group S.A.
Page 19
www.spglobal.com/ratingsdirect April 23, 2019 19
Naturgy Energy Group S.A.
STANDARD & POOR’S, S&P and RATINGSDIRECT are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors.S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites,www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means,including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available atwww.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of theirrespective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&Phas established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with eachanalytical process.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction forcertain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its solediscretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment aswell as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they areexpressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are notrecommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of anysecurity. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied onand is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when makinginvestment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. WhileS&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of duediligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasonsthat are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on acredit rating and related analyses.
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or anypart thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database orretrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). TheContent shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers,shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of theContent. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the resultsobtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is”basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OFMERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THATTHE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARECONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive,special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits andopportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of suchdamages.
Copyright © 2019 by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC. All rights reserved.