7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
1/58
Ch. 3 : National Income
Determination (II)
(Simple Keynesian Model)
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
2/58
C=Ca + cYd
C
Y
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
3/58
I=Ia
Y
I
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
4/58
G=Ga
Y
G
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
5/58
X=Xa
Y
X
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
6/58
T=Ta
Y
T
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
7/58
M=Ma + mY
Y
M
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
8/58
AE=C+I+G+(X-M)
Y
AE
Y*
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
9/58
Y
$
I+G+X
S+T+M
Y*
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
10/58
Fiscal Pol icy
Discretionary Fiscal Policy
expansionary fiscal policy
(1) increased government spending,
(2) lower taxes, or
(3) a combination of the two.
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
11/58
contrationary fiscal policy
(1) decreased government spending,
(2) higher taxes, or
(3) a combination of the two.
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
12/58
Problems of Fiscal Policy
1. Recogn it ion Lag
2. Execu tive Lag
3. Response Lag
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
13/58
Changing Government
Expenditure or Taxes? 1. Location of Effects
2. Time Lag
3. The Reversibility of the Policy
4. The Publics Reaction to Short-term
Changes
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
14/58
Built-in stabilisers
Built-in stabilisers are those institutional
arrangements that automatically increase
government deficit (or decrease surplus)during slumps/recessions, and increase
surplus (or decrease deficit) during booms,
without the government having to make anypolicy decision.
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
15/58
Examples of built-in stabilizers
Progressive Tax System
Welfare Scheme
Government Purchases
Corporate and Family Savings
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
16/58
Some built-in stabilizers that may
create disincentives: progressive taxation
unemployment and welfare benefits
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
17/58
Some built-in stabilizers that do
not create disincentives:
corporate savings
family savings
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
18/58
Limitations of built-in stabilizers:
Built-in stabilisers can reduce fluctuations
but cannot maintain full stability.
built-in stabilisers may reduce the speed ofrecovery
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
19/58
Balanced-Budget Multipl ier
C=Ca+cYd
G=Ga
I=Ia
T=Ta
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
20/58
The government expenditure multiplier:
Kg=1/(1-c) The tax multiplier :
Kt=-c/(1-c)
The balanced-budget multiplier:Kb=1/(1-c) + -c/(1-c)
=1
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
21/58
Ga by $1 will increase income by:
1+MPC+MPC2+MPC3 ......---(1)
Ta by $1 will decrease income by:
MPC+MPC2+MPC3 ......---(2)
Ga - Ta = 1
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
22/58
Recessionary (Deflationary) Gap and F iscal Policy
AE
Y
Ye Yf
AE
AE
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
23/58
I nf lationary Gap and F iscal Policy
AE
Y
Yf Ye
AE
AE
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
24/58
Paradox of Thrift
Thriftiness, while a virtue for the individual,
is disastrous for an economy.
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
25/58
If consumers seek to save a larger amount
out of any given level of income, thatattempt to save more may lead to a fall in
income leaving the amount of savings
unchanged or even decreased.
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
26/58
Case 1:
I nvestment expenditure is autonomousGiven: S = -Ca+(1-c)Y
I =Ia
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
27/58
The Paradox of Thr if t
I,S
I=Ia
S1
Y1
S2
Y2
Y
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
28/58
Example
S1=-20+(1-0.75)Y
I=20
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
29/58
At equilibrium,
I=S
20=-20+(1-0.75)Y
40=0.25Y
Y=160
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
30/58
the realized saving is:
S1=-20+(1-0.75)Y
=-20+0.25(160)
=-20+40
=20
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
31/58
Suppose the saving function shifts upward,
S2=-10+(1-0.75)Y
I=20
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
32/58
At equilibrium,
I=S
20=-10+(1-0.75)Y
30=0.25Y
Y=120
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
33/58
Now the realized saving is:
S2=-10+(1-0.75)Y
=-10+0.25(120)
=-10+30
=20
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
34/58
Case 2:
I nvestment expenditure is an increasingfunction of national income
Given: S = -Ca+(1-c)Y
I = Ia+eY
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
35/58
The Paradox of Thr if t
I,S
I=Ia+eY
S1
Y1
S2
Y2
Y
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
36/58
How the paradox can be resolved?
If planned investment increases as a result
of the increase in planned saving, then there
may not be a decrease in national output.
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
37/58
The Paradox of Thr if t
I,S
I=Ia
S1
Y1
Y
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
38/58
The Paradox of Thr if t
I,S
I=Ia
S1
Y1
S2
Y
Y2
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
39/58
The Paradox of Thr if t
I,S
I=Ia
S1
Y1
S2
Y
I=Ia
Y2
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
40/58
The Paradox of Thr if t
I,S
I=Ia
S1
Y1
Y
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
41/58
The Paradox of Thr if t
I,S
S1
Y1
S2
Y2
Y
I=Ia+eY
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
42/58
The Paradox of Thr if t
I,S
I=Ia+eYS1
Y1
S2
Y2
Y
I=Ia+eY
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
43/58
Revision Exercise
What is the 'paradox of thrift'? Explain, with theaid of diagrams, how this paradox can be resolved.
Compare the magnitudes of the income multipliers
of the simple Keynesian model under the
following tax systems: lump sum income tax,proportional income tax and progressive tax.
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
44/58
What are automatic stabilizers? Give two
examples to illustrate your answer.
Compare the effectiveness of the
proportional income tax and the progressiveincome tax in reducing economic instability.
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
45/58
'Consumption depends on the level of
income.''The level of income depends on
consumption.'
With the aid of diagrams, reconcile these
two statements with reference to the
Keynesian model.
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
46/58
Answer:
In the consumption curve, consumption is a
function of the level of income. As incomeincreases, consumption will also increase. In theKeynesian model, the consumption is assumed to
be: C = a + c Y where a is the intercept and c isthe marginal propensity to consume.
If the consumption curve shifts upward, thelevel of income will be increased because of theincrease of aggregate demand in the economy.Therefore the level of income depends onconsumption.
There is no circular reasoning: it is a case ofmutual determination of income and consumption.
Mutual dependence is not an inconsistency.
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
47/58
Consider the following information about
Country A:C = 0.8Yd
I = 260
G = 400T = 0.5Y
X = 300
M = 0.2Y
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
48/58
Find:
i. the equilibrium level of national income
ii. the income multiplier
iii. the tax multiplier
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
49/58
Answer a. Find the equilibrium income.
In equilibrium, Y = AE
Y = C + I + G
= 400 + 0.8(Y-T) + 50 + 32
= 482 + 0.8(Y - 40 - 0.375Y)
= 450 + 0.5Y
0.5Y = 450
Y = 900
In equilibrium, Y = 900
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
50/58
b. b. Find the income multiplier.
Income multiplier = 1/(1-c-ct)
= 1/[1-
0.8+(0.8)(0.375)]
= 2
The income multiplier is equal to 2.
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
51/58
c.
Given that the existing income level is
900, and that the income multiplier is 2,
the government has to increase itsexpenditure by 50 for full employment to
be attained.
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
52/58
Consider the following information:
Labour force (L) = 600
Production function = 3L
Find:
i. the full-employment income level
ii. the no. of labour that is unemployed
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
53/58
Suppose the government is planning to
increase her expenditure in order to
stimulate the economy. How much
expenditure should the government increase
to achieve full-employment?
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
54/58
In a closed economy, private consumption
(C), investment (I), government expenditure
(G), transfer payments (TR) and tax revenue
(T) are as follows:
C = 50 + 0.8Yd
I = 50
G = 100
TR = 50T = 0.25Y
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
55/58
a.
(i) What is the equilibrium value of Y?
(ii) What is the value of the multiplier for
government expenditure?(iii) What is the balance of the government
budget?
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
56/58
b. Assume that government expenditure is
now increased by 20, from 100 to 120.
If the government wants to pursue a
balanced budget, what should be the
amount of transfer payments?
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
57/58
AL Questions
7/28/2019 National Income Determination (II)
58/58
AL 2000/5
AD, X, M
Y
X
C+I+G+X-M
450
trade deficitM
(C+I+G+X-M)
Y* Y**
A
B
C
D