NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA (MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS) GOVERNMENT OF INDIA Four - Laning of Panvel - Indapur Section Of NH-17 (Presently, NH-66) From Km 0.000 to 84.000 In The State Of Maharashtra (Package No: NHDP - III/DL4/05) Monthly Progress Report No - 37 February 2015 Yongma Engineering Co., Ltd. Feedback Infra Private Limited. In Association with
149
Embed
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIAnhai.org.in/spw/Process/M_P_R February15.pdfNATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA (MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS) GOVERNMENT OF INDIA Four
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
(MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS)
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
Four - Laning of Panvel - Indapur Section
Of NH-17 (Presently, NH-66) From Km 0.000 to 84.000 In The State Of Maharashtra
(Package No: NHDP - III/DL4/05)
Monthly Progress Report No - 37
February 2015
Yongma Engineering Co., Ltd.
Feedback Infra Private Limited.
In Association with
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February ‘15 Page 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Executive Summary 03
1.0 THE PROJECT 10
1.1 Project Background 10
1.2 Project Location 10
1.3 Terrain and Alignment 12
1.4 Salient Features 12
1.5 Project Milestones 28
1.6 Location Map 28
2.0 THE ESTABLISHMENT 31
2.1 Project Organisation 31
2.2 Plant & Machinery 35
3.0 PROGRESS OF WORKS 38
3.1 Land Handing Over 38
3.2 Tree Cutting 39
3.3 Utility Shifting 39
3.4 Design Review 40
3.5 Progress of Major Works 42
3.6 Miscellaneous Works 44
3.7 Status of Project Facilities 44
3.8 Overall Physical / Financial Progress 44
4.0 QUALITY CONTROL & QUALITY ASSURANCE 53
4.1 Quality Control & Quality Assurance 53
4.2 Compliance / Non-Compliance 53
4.3 Routine Inspection by Independent Engineer 53
5.0 TRAFFIC & SAFETY 82
5.1 Safety Issues 82
5.2 Accident Data 82
5.3 Maintenance of Existing Highway 82
6.0 CONTRACTUAL ISSUES 84
6.1 Changes of Scope 84
6.2 Project Milestones 86
6.3 Land Acquisition issue between Balganga and Balivali Bridges 89
6.4 Un-approved Steel in use 90
6.5 Non construction of Exit/Entry Ramps 90
7.0 CRITICAL ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 91
8.0 PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS 97
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February ‘15 Page 2
Appendices Page
A Comments on Concessionaire’s Monthly Progress Report 98
B Weather 99
C Important Visits 100
D Minutes of Progress Review Meeting 101
E Site Inspection Notes by Independent Engineer 102
F Letters from NHAI to Independent Engineer 105
G Letters from Concessionaire to Independent Engineer 107
H Letters Issued by Independent Engineer 108
I Accident Data & Observation 112
J Highway - Progress 114
K Structures - Progress 115
L Status Of Vehicular Underpasses - Progress 135
M Status Of Pedestrian Underpasses - Progress 138
N Slab/Box Culverts - Progress 142
O Pipe Culverts - Progress 145
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February ‘15 Page 3
Executive Summary
National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) has entrusted the work of design,
construction, development, finance, operation and maintenance of Four-Laning of the
Panvel - Indapur section of NH-17 (Presently, NH-66) in the state of Maharashtra under
NHDP phase - III on DBFOT basis (Package No : NHDP-III/DL4/05) to the Concessionaire
Supreme Panvel-Indapur Tollways Pvt. Ltd. (SPITPL). Concessionaire has deployed two EPC
Contractors for the construction of the Project (M/s Mahavir Roads and Infrastructure Pvt.
Ltd. and M/s Supreme Infrastructure India Limited). M/s Yongma Engineering Co., Ltd. in
association with M/s Feedback Infra Private Limited has been appointed as the Independent
Engineer [IE] for the Project.
The Project stretch runs in plain and short stretch of hilly terrain. The Project includes
6 nos. Major Bridges, 23 nos. Minor Bridges, 2 nos. Flyovers, 3 nos. ROB’s, 11 nos.
Culverts, 208+20 Pipe Culverts and 2 nos. Toll Plaza’s. The length of service road on LHS is
19.79 Km at on RHS is 17.76 Km totaling to 37.55 Km. and mostly located at urban areas of
the Project highway. The Panvel - Indapur section passes through the towns of Pen,
Vadkhal, Nagothane, Kolad and ends at km 84 before Indapur town.
Concession Agreement was signed on 21-01-2011 and the Appointed Date was 19-12-2011.
The scheduled date of completion of construction was 16-06-2014 (with 910 days
construction period).
Shifting of electrical poles, lines and MJP water pipeline are very slow. Shifting of ISPAT
water pipe line is still in progress. NHAI has given approval for laying CIDCO water pipeline
along the Project Highway. CIDCO has procured pipes and started laying pipes.
The quantities and percentage progress reported earlier by Concessionaire are on higher
side. Also, the lengths of highway works reported are more than actual lengths completed
at site. Independent Engineer approximately estimated the progress details. Now, as the
new construction programme alongwith Extension of Time (EOT) request by Concessioniare
is approved by NHAI Executive Committee, the progress details are evaluated based on the
scheduled progress given thereof. Though the scheduled construction period is over by 16-
06-’14, the cumulative achieved Physical Progress is 34.86 % as against Scheduled Physical
Progress of 39.89 %. That means, the slip is 5.03 %. The cumulative achieved Financial
Progress is Rs. 425.62 Crores (35.30%) as against scheduled Financial Progress of Rs.
482.83 Crores (40.04 %). That means, the slip is Rs. 57.21 Crores (4.74%).
Land Acquisition: Total land to be acquired is approximately 504 Ha. As per the
Concession Agreement, NHAI shall make best efforts to procure and grant, no later than 90
days from the Appointed Date, the Right of Way to the Concessionaire in respect of all land
included in the Appendix. NHAI may speed up balance land acquisition process.
Forest Land: Approval of Forest land except Ch. 0+000 to 20+100 issued by NHAI vide
letter No. NHAI/PIU/PANVEL/PI/SPITPL/ Forest/2013/1201 dt.23-08-’13. The portion from
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February ‘15 Page 4
Ch 0+000 to 20+100 comes under Eco-sensitive zone. Approval for non core area (length
16.6 km) of Eco-Sensitive Zone has been obtained. However, PCCF Maharashtra has asked
to obtain NGT approval. Proposal for obtaining NBWL approval for core area (3.5 Km) has
been resubmitted to NBWL for reconsideration. Additional land of 1.3 Ha affecting 300m
length in Sukheli Khind need to be approved by MoEF.
No Progress of RE Wall Works: The construction RE wall started long back and now
completely stopped. This is major critical activity of the Project.
Non-Removal of Encumbrances : NHAI has issued notice under section 26 of the
Control of National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002 to unauthorized occupants in
some of the villages. Police support is sought. Most of the encroachments in Kollad, Pui,
Khamb, Varas gaon villages are removed. However, some buildings are yet to be removed
in other villages for want of payment, valuation etc. Concessionaire has not submitted the
programme for encroachment removal/building removal in spite of several reminders.
Concession Agreement, Clause 5.1.4 (e) specifies that “Concessionaire should make
reasonable efforts to facilitate the acquisition Concession Agreement, Clause 5.1.4 (e)
specifies that “Concessionaire should make reasonable efforts to facilitate the acquisition of
land required for the purpose of the Agreement”. Also, Concession Agreement, Clause 4.1.4
specifies that “Each party shall make all reasonable endeavors to satisfy the conditions
precedent within the time stipulated and shall provide the other party with such reasonable
cooperation as may be required to assist that party in satisfying the conditions precedent
for which that party is responsible”.
Very Slow Progress of Structures: The progress of structures (especially, major
bridges, flyovers and ROB’s) is very slow. Concessionaire should improve the progress of
structures. Overall progress is only 35%. Out of the total 26 underpasses not even single
underpass structure and its approaches completed so far.
Decision on Change of Scope Proposals: Concessionaire has submitted many Change
of Scope proposals. Some of them are still pending with NHAI for decision. Our records
show that Concessionaire has not submitted necessary clarifications /details for the following
Changes of Scope in spite of several reminders:
Sl No
Description of Change of Scope
Status
1 Deletion of Palaspe Flyover at Ch. 0+260
Approved in principle by NHAI. Concessionaire has not submitted detailed quantities in proper order so far.
2 Nallah diversion through box culvert at Ch. 4+900 to 4+993
Clarifications are yet to be submitted by Concessionaire.
3 Deletion of pipe culvert at Ch. 22+798
Concessionaire is advised to submit clarifications.
4 VUP at 23+450 (Hamarapur) on RHS main carriageway.
Proposal to be modified by Concessionaire considering that the additional VUP (as envisaged in CA) to be constructed at this location. Concessionaire is advised to submit details.
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February ‘15 Page 5
Sl No
Description of Change of Scope
Status
5 Underpasses in Pen City Approved in principle by NHAI. Concessionaire has not submitted detailed quantities so far.
6 Additional Culverts at various locations
Approved in principle by NHAI. Concessionaire has not submitted detailed quantities so far.
7 Exit/Entry Ramps at Start and End of Service road
Compliance to the observations not yet submitted.
Distress in new pavement: The newly laid DBM/BC is showing distress at many
locations. Concessionaire is advised to investigate in detail regarding such re-occurrence of
pavement distress during construction. Independent Engineer has insisted Concessionaire
to follow good engineering practices during pavement construction. It has been reminded
many times the importance of constructing kerb before taking up bituminous works, use of
PTR for DBM layer, constructing median drain and chutes, proper drainage arrangements
during construction, temperature control etc.
Un-approved Steel in use: Conditional Source approval for steel from M/s Shree
Vaishnav Alloys Pvt. Ltd was concurred on 01-05-’12 based on the condition that the
challans for billets (from main and major producers) and Manufacturer Test Certificate
(MTC) will be submitted. Meanwhile, NHAI informed that the steel shall be procured from
main and major producers only as per IRC: SP: 84-2009 which are SAIL, IRNL, TATA,
ESSAR, ISPAT, JSW Steel Ltd and JSL. No re- rolled steel shall be permitted in NHAI works.
In some of the minor bridges, Concessionaire has used Sangam TMT, SUN TMT etc. also
which were notified to the Concessionaire through various NCR’s, Site Inspection Reports.
Concessionaire was strictly advised to use steel produced from main and major producers
only as per NHAI’s circulars. The source approval for M/s Shree Vaishnav Alloys Pvt. Ltd.
was withdrawn with affect from 25-07-’13. Even after withdrawing concurrence,
Concessionaire has been using un-approved steel in many structures. Engineer has issued
letter to Concessionaire warning them that IE will be constrained to initiate necessary
punitive action as per the provisions of Concession Agreement without any further notice.
Project Milestones
The statues of various project milestones are given below:
Milestone Description Scheduled
Date Progress
Requirements Status
Milestone-I First anniversary of the Appointed Date
19-12-2012
Physical Progress : Not less than 25%
Expended Cost : Not less than 25% of total capital cost
Milestone - I was achieved on 01-05-’13. (That is during Extension of Time period). However, EOT is recently approved by the Executive Committee of NHAI.
Milestone-II
Second anniversary of the Appointed Date
19-12-2013
Physical Progress : Not less than 65%
Expended Cost : Not less than 65% of total
Concessionaire vide their letter no SPITPL/ P-NHAI/ 2003-14/ 2471 dt. 28-01-’14 claimed and informed NHAI that they have achieved Milestone-II
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February ‘15 Page 6
Milestone Description Scheduled
Date Progress
Requirements Status
capital cost considering the available land. Recently, Executive Committee of NHAI has given Extension of Time (EOT) for achievement of Milestone-II upto 31-10-2015.
Four Laning (Project Completion)
910th day from the Appointed Date
16-06-2014 Four Lane completion in accordance with Concession Agreement
Concessionaire has not achieved Four Laning (Project completion) by scheduled date. Concessionaire has submitted request for Extension of Time (EOT) for Four - Laning upto November 2016. Executive Committee of NHAI has given approval for Extension of Time (EOT) upto 31-03-2016 (except eco-sensitive zone).
Very Slow Progress of Works:
(a) In spite of prevailing good working season, absolutely no work is in progress in both sections.
It appears that the works are held up for want of fund cement, bitumen, diesel, manpower,
machinery, and other resources. The physical progress during August ’14 to February ‘15 are
0.01%, 0.04%, 0.03%, 0.02%, 0.0%, 0.00% and 0.02% respectively. The length of highway
works completed(m) during these months are given below:
(b) It has also been observed that at following underpass locations works can start/continue:
Sl No Chainage Description Concessionaire’s Comments Our Comments
1 25+860
Khopoli VUP
Panvel
approach
CIDCO pipeline is the major
hurdle: CIDCO pipeline on LHS is
not yet removed by the
authority. There is still land
acquisition problem which is not
sorted out in totally.
CIDCO pipeline will not
affect approach
construction. There is
absolutely no problem
to construct the
approaches.
2 30+930 Wadkhal
VUP Indapur
Land problem and the continuous
stretch of land is not available for
There is no problem in
constructing the
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February ‘15 Page 7
(c) The works for Rest area, busbays, truck laybyes etc. are not yet started.
(d) Independent Engineer’s review on the progress of work on highway alongwith land availability
shows that at following locations, highway works should have been in progress.
Sl No
Chainage Side
Length (Km)
Remarks From To
1 0+400 1+000 B/S 600 BC can be done after rectification of distressed DBM 2 1+500 4+300 B/S 2,800 BC can be done after rectification of distressed DBM 3 5+500 6+800 B/S 1,300 BC can be done after rectification of distressed DBM 4 21+300 23+500 RHS 2,200 BC can be done after rectification of distressed DBM 5 22+950 23+350 LHS 400 Slow Progress 6 31+000 31+600 B/S 600 Work yet to be started 7 40+100 41+900 B/S 1,800 BC can be done after rectification of distressed DBM 8 51+500 51+900 LHS 400 WMM work still not completed 9 59+400 60+300 LHS 900 No work 10 59+700 59+900 RHS 200 Earthwork is not completed 11 60+800 61+700 LHS 900 No work 12 62+400 63+100 LHS 700 No work 13 63+900 65+900 LHS 2,000 Work is slow progress 14 70+000 72+300 LHS 2,300 No work 15 74+800 76+200 RHS 1,400 Work is slow progress 16 76+550 76+850 LHS 300 No work 17 77+000 77+700 RHS 700 No work 18 81+500 82+600 LHS 1,100 No work
approach construction activity. approaches.
3 49+280
Koleti PUP
approaches
both ends
Award passed, no payment made
to land owners. Land problem to
be dealt by NHAI.
Service road can be
constructed on LHS and
accordingly approaches
can be constructed.
4 50+845
Palas PUP
approaches
on both ends
Verification of land required from
Dy. SLR for confirmation of
encroachment of private land.
The Vaishali Hotel owner
allowing any construction
activity.
There is no problem in
constructing service
road on LHS and thus
constructing the
approaches.
5 54+450 Nagothane
VUP
Govt. land/court matter & the
embankment toe is going
Railway land (ROW) on LHS.
Matter needs to be sorted for
starting the construction activity.
There is no problem for
constructing RHS
service road and the
approaches.
6 68+320 Khmab PUP
Still there are 9 structures on site
which not in vacant position,
continuous stretch of land is not
RE wall.
Concessionaire should
proactively support for
encroachment removal
if any.
7 79+140 Ratwad PUP
No payment made to land
owners. Land owners are not
allowing for work, land problem
to be solved by NHAI.
There is no problem in
constructing the
approaches.
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February ‘15 Page 8
Sl No
Chainage Side
Length (Km)
Remarks From To
19 81+200 82+400 RHS 1,200 GSB work is not completed 20 81+500 82+600 LHS 1,100 No work
Total 22,900
The above details show that in spite of sufficient work fronts available the Concessionaire could
not achieve better progress due to lack of various resources such as fund, machinery, diesel,
manpower etc.
Non - Maintenance of The Project Highway : It has been observed that at many locations
(most of them are in new carriageway) many Potholes/Patchwork are not yet repaired in spite
of continuous follow up with Concessionaire. Non-maintenance of the highway is leading to lot
of criticism by the road users, administration and print media. Non-maintenance of the highway
will have to be considered as default of obligations by the Concessionaire as per the terms of
Concession Agreement. Detailed list of such maintenance issues were informed to the
Concessionaire.
Many Pending Designs and Drawings: Many design and drawings for highway and
structures are still pending with Concessionaire. An updated list was issued to
Concessionaire vide letter no. PIP/IE/SPITPL/2014/2806 dt. 04-12-’14. In spite of several
reminders no action is taken by Concessionaire for last nine months.
Non - Closure Of NCR’s, Site Inspection Reports, Audit Reports: Concessionaire
has not closed out many NCR’s Site Inspection Reports / Audit Reports in spite of several
reminders. Non-closure of such NCR’s/Site Inspection Report/Audit Reports/ letters on
quality issues etc. is of major quality concern and will lead to contractual complications.
Insufficient Resources: Concessionaire has not mobilised sufficient resources such as
fund manpower, machinery, plant etc. Resources mobilised are very less. Construction
works were held up many times for want of fund, cement, bitumen, diesel, manpower,
machinery and other resources etc.
Crusher Production in Section - II : It has been observed that crusher production in
Section - II is very less and will not cater for requirement and this has been reported to
Concessionaire vide letter no. PIP/IE/SPITPL/2014/2773 dt. 21-11-’14. Most of the time,
the crusher is break down.
Status of ROB Approvals: The following is the status of approval of ROB’s:
Sl No
Chainage (Km)
Location Status
1 16+062 Kharpada
(1) GAD (General Arrangement Drawing) - Approved by
(1) GAD (General Arrangement Drawing) - Approved by
Railways.
(2) SAD (Structure Arrangement Drawing) - Not Submitted
(3) TAD (Temporary Arrangement Drawing) - Not Submitted
to Railways
(4) CRS (Commissioner Railway Safety) - Sanction not
Obtained
(5) Codal charges not paid by Concessionaire
(6) MoU executed.
Details of Utility Shifting:
Sl No
Description Total Length
(m) Status
A CIDCO Water Pipe Lines 5080 m In-principle approval given for shifting. Shifting works already started. This is affecting 2.0 Km length of main carriageway.
B Reliance / NOCIL Gas Pipeline 690 m
The exact location of pipeline identified. Concessionaire has to submit proposal by modifying the piers P11 (L), P12 (L), P13 (L) and P15 (R). The abutment A1 may be converted to pier and retaining wall type. The 4” pipe which comes in embankment portion may be encased by utility owner.
C
MSEDCL Electrical Lines & Poles (17 DTC Transformers, 665 HT Poles, 841 LT Poles, 96 HT Crossings, 138 LT Crossings and 3 river crossings)
4,850m LHS
21,050m RHS
Very slow progress. Out of total 237 crossings, only 3 nos. crossings done so far.
D MJP Water Pipeline (200 to 450 mm Ø Water line)
19,840m LHS
4,180m RHS
Shifting works in very slow progress. Pipe laid for 7 Km only out of total length of 23.5 Km. The MJP officials have many times shown their protest against such slow progress by the Concessionaire.
E ISPAT Water Pipeline 21,670m LHS
70m RHS
Shifting works in progress. 4.1 Km length shifting completed.
F ZP water pipeline 5,090m LHS
4,030m RHS Slow progress in shifting.
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February ‘15 Page 10
1.0 THE PROJECT
1.1 Project Background
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) has decided to take up the
development of various National Highways Stretches / Corridors under the National
Highways Development Programme (NHDP). NHAI had accordingly invited proposals by
its Notice Request for Qualification No. NHAI/NHDP-III/MAHA/BOT/PI dated 29-01-
2010 (the "Request for Qualification" or "RFQ") for short listing of bidders for
construction, operation and maintenance of the of NH-17 (Presently, NH-66) on DBFOT
basis and had shortlisted certain bidders including, the consortium comprising M/s
Supreme Infrastructure India Ltd., M/s China State Construction Engineering (Hong
Kong) Ltd. and M/s Mahavir Roads and Infrastructures Private Ltd. with M/s Supreme
Infrastructure India Ltd. as its Lead Member. Further, NHAI had accepted the bid of
the Consortium and issued its Letter of Award No. NHAI/BOT-I/11012/62/2005/14902
dated 28-10-2010 to the Consortium. On 21-01-2011, NHAI entered into agreement
with Consortium “Supreme Panvel Indapur Tollways Private Limited (SPITPL)” as
Concessionaire, a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act,
1956 and having its registered office at Supreme City, Hiranandani Complex, Powai,
Mumbai - 400076, Maharashtra, India, for execution of the Project on DBFOT basis.
Thus, National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) has entrusted the work of design,
construction, development, finance, operation and maintenance of Four-Laning of the
Panvel - Indapur section of NH-17 (Presently, NH-66) sin the state of Maharashtra
under NHDP phase - III on DBFOT basis (Package No : NHDP-III/DL4/05) to the
Concessionaire M/s Supreme Panvel-Indapur Tollways Pvt. Ltd. (SPITPL).
Concessionaire has deployed two EPC Contractors for the construction of the Project.
M/s Yongma Engineering Co., Ltd. in association with M/s Feedback Infra Private
Limited has been appointed as the Independent Engineer [IE] for the Project.
The Project is having 84.6 Km length, located in the state of Maharashtra passing along
and adjacent to the Arabian Sea coast. The Project basically constitute upgradation
involving construction of 4-lanes highway including bridges, widening and rehabilitation
of existing bridges and culverts, elevated structures, ROB’s, wayside amenities,
realignment, bypasses etc. The Project forms part of the National Highway
Development Project (NHDP Phase-III) Programme.
1.2 Project Location The Panvel - Indapur section of NH-17 (Presently, NH-66) is located in the district of
Raigarh, which in turn is located in the State of Maharashtra. The State lies in the
western part of the Indian peninsula and is surrounded by the States of Gujarat,
Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka.
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February ‘15 Page 11
Maharashtra has an area of 307,690 sq. km with a population of 96,752,247 and
Mumbai is the state capital. The population density per sq. km is 314.44. It has a
literacy rate of 77.3 %, the second highest in the country, against the average Indian
scenario of 65.4 %. More than 900 educational institutions provide 1,69,000 technical
manpower each year and 30% share of new patents, setting the pace for innovation in
India. There are in all 35 districts in Maharashtra. Raigarh district is situated in the
western part of Maharashtra. Raigarh district is surrounded by Thane district in the
north; Pune district in the east; Ratnagiri district in the south; and the Arabian Sea in
the west. According to 2001 census, the population of Raigarh was 2,205,972 with
population density of 309 persons per Sq Km. The district, being a part of Konkan
region receives heavy rainfall during the monsoon.
The National Highway No-17 (Presently, NH-66) is on the west coast linking Panvel
(Maharashtra) and Cochin (Kerala). This section of the National Highway is heavily
trafficked by both passenger vehicles and freight transport vehicles. To meet the need
for road safety and development of the area, Government of India through the
National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) is implementing the Project of
strengthening and widening of the existing two-lane roadway to a four-lane dual
carriageway. Apart from the four laning, flyovers, vehicular underpasses, pedestrian
underpasses, service roads, highway traffic management systems and other road
safety measures will be provided in these sections. The concession period is 21 years
including construction period of 910 days (approximately 2.5 years). The
implementation of the Project will reduce the time and cost of travel for traffic plying
between Panvel and Indapur in the Raigarh district of Maharashtra State. It will also
add to the development of tourism in the State.
NH-17 (Presently, NH-66) mainly traverses through the west coast of India, sometimes
touching shores of Arabian Sea. This highway touches the Arabian Sea
at Maravanthe in Karnataka and Thalassery in Kerala. It passes through the States of
Maharashtra, Goa, Karnataka and Kerala.
NH-17 (Presently, NH-66) start from the junction with NH-4B near Panvel connecting
Indapur, Mahad, Rajapur, Kudal in Maharashtra, Panaji and Margoa in Goa, Karwar,
Honavar, Udupi, Mangalore in Karnataka, Kasaragod, Kannur, Ponnani, Edappalli etc.
NH-17 (Presently, NH-66) allows for movement of goods by trucks from hinterland to
major sea ports of India. The trade and commerce in the region has increased due to
expansion of markets for agricultural and sea food produced in the region connected
by this highway.
The Project stretch runs in plain and short stretch of hilly terrain. The Project includes
6 nos. Major Bridges, 23 nos. Minor Bridges, 2 nos. Flyovers, 3 nos. ROB’s, 11 nos
The Project passes primarily through plain & rolling terrain except for the two small
Ghat sections (Km 8 to 9 & Km 64 to 66) where the terrain can be classified as hilly.
The alignment is single carriageway comprising two lanes with width ranging from 7 m
to 10 m and earthen shoulder on either side. The alignment is generally straight with
reasonably large radii curves that are generally appropriate for high speeds except for
some sharp curves in the Karnala Bird Sanctuary portion and Sukheli Khind ghat
section. In these hilly stretches the alignment follows a winding path and several sharp
curves with limited sight distance are present. These curves need to be redesigned to
the extent possible within the available ROW and the overall visibility improved. In the
plain / rolling stretch the highway is not having any major cutting and filling whereas in
the Ghat areas some sections involve large to deep cuts. About 80 % of the Project
Highway runs on an embankment of 1.0 to 2.0 m height. However, significant
variations in heights of embankment are observed at low-lying fields and also at bridge
approaches.
The highway passes through rural agricultural areas and villages, such as Pen (Km
26+600 to 30+000), Wadkhal (Km 32+000 to 34+600), Nagothane (Km 53+000 to
56+200) and Kolad (Km 71+500 to 74+000). The adjoining land use is predominantly
barren with patches of agricultural land, forest and built-up locations. The highway
passes through several towns and many villages some of which have settlements in
close proximity of the highway.
The existing highway has a single two-lane carriageway with pavement width varying
from 10 m to 11.0 m and 1.0 m wide soft shoulder on either side till Km 33. Beyond
this, the width is 7.0 m with soft shoulders of 1.5 to 2.0 m, till the end of the Project.
The highway is on an embankment for most of the length except in Ghat areas from
Km 8 to 9 and Km 64 to 66 where it lies in cutting. The embankment height in general
varies between 1.0 to 5.0 m but there are several locations where it is less than 1m.
However, there is no history of submergence or overtopping of the pavement at these
locations. The depth of cutting in Ghat Sections varies between 1.0 to 10.0 m. The
pavement condition is found to be fair to good for the almost the entire length except
for the stretch from Km 20 to 25 and Km 40 to 42 where substantial raveling and
rutting is observed. The riding quality as such also varies from fair to quite good. Most
of these stretches have been overlaid recently by the Department.
No organised drainage system exists along the Project Highway. However, the highway
level is sufficiently raised and earthen drains have been constructed to drain the
surface water to the nearby culverts. At some locations, lined drains have also been
constructed adjacent to the shoulders. Local enquiries reveal that there is no history of
overtopping of the road at any location.
1.4 Salient Features
Contract data is given in Table 1.1. Salient features are given in Table 1.2.
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February ‘15 Page 13
Table 1.1 Contract Data
Description Details
Name of Project
Design, Construction, Development, Finance, Operation and Maintenance of Four-Laning of Panvel-Indapur section of NH-17 from Km. 0+000 to 84+000 in the State of Maharashtra under NHDP Phase-III on DBFOT Basis.
Package No. NHDP-III/DL4/05
Source of Funding DBFOT Basis
Client/Employer National Highway Authority of India (NHAI), G-5 & 6, Sector 10, Dwaraka, New Delhi. PIN: 110 075
38 81+825 Wavediwali T Junction 3112 No important cross road in between.
39 82+760 Gangewadi T Junction 1260
40 84+387 Nagroli T Junction 1627
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February ‘15 Page 28
1.5 Project Milestones
The Project Milestones details are given in Table 1.21
Table 1.21 Project Milestones
Milestone Description Scheduled
Date Progress
Requirements Status
Milestone-I
First anniversary of the Appointed Date
19-12-2012
Physical Progress : Not less than 25%
Expended Cost : Not
less than 25% of total capital cost
Milestone - I was achieved on 01-05-’13. (That is during Extension of Time period). However, EOT is recently approved by the Executive Committee of NHAI.
Milestone-II
Second anniversary of
the Appointed Date
19-12-2013
Physical Progress : Not less than 65%
Expended Cost : Not less than 65% of total capital cost
Concessionaire vide their letter no SPITPL/ P-NHAI/ 2003-14/ 2471 dt. 28-01-’14 informed NHAI that they have achieved Milestone-II considering the available land. Recently, Executive Committee of NHAI has given Extension of Time (EOT) for achievement of Milestone-II upto 31-10-2015.
Four Laning (Project Completion)
910th day from the Appointed Date
16-06-2014 Four Lane completion in accordance with Concession Agreement
Concessionaire has not achieved Four Laning (Project completion) by scheduled date. Concessionaire has submitted request for Extension of Time (EOT) for Four - Laning upto November 2016. Executive Committee of NHAI has given approval for Extension of Time (EOT) upto 31-03-2016 (except eco-sensitive zone).
1.6 Location Map
Raigarh District Map is given in Figure 1.1. The road network map of Raigarh district is
shown in Figure 1.2.
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February ‘15 Page 29
Figure 1.1 District map of Raigarh
Figure 1.2 Road network in Raigarh District
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February ‘15 Page 30
Figure 1.3 Key plan
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February ‘15 Page 31
2.0 THE ESTABLISHMENT
2.1 Project Organisation
NHAI
NHAI have established a Project Implementation Unit at Panvel. The Project
Director is Mr. Prashant J. Fegade. He is supported by the Manager (Tech.) Mr.
Narayankar and other Administrative Staff.
Concessionaire
The Organization of Concessionaire’s is represented by its SPV Manager, Mr.
Pradeep Garole. He is responsible for day to day activities of the Concessionaire
and he also provides information to IE/NHAI as and when necessary.
Concessionaire has established their office near Km 27+800 at Pen.
Concessionaire’s Organisation chart is given in Figure 2.1.
Figure - 2.1 Concessionaire’s Organisation Chart
Concessionaire has appointed M/s Sowil Limited as Project Management
Consultants (PMC) and they have established their office at the same premises
that of the Concessionaire.
Independent Engineer
The Independent Engineer, Yongma Engineering Co., Ltd in Association with
Feedback Infra Private Limited. mobilised on 28-12-’11 and the Consultancy
Agreement was signed on 11-01-‘12. The team at site is headed by the Team
Leader cum Sr. Highway Engineer. All Key-Professionals are already mobilised.
Part Time / Intermittent staff is visiting site on as and when required basis apart
AGM (Planning):
Mr. Umapathi T B
G M (Finance):
Mr. Kamlesh Chechani
GM (Projects)
Vice President:
Mr. P.S. Garole
Acting Team Leader :
Gangadharan C.P.
Director:
Mr. Vikas Sharma
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February ‘15 Page 32
from reviewing Design, Drawings and Submittals from main / satellite offices. In
addition to above, Project Manager and Project Director at Head Office work as
link between site office and main office for co-ordinating issues beyond day to day
works. The Table 2.1 below shows the deployment of Independent Engineer.
Table 2.1 Deployment Details of Independent Engineer
Sl
No Position Name
Date of
Mobilisation
Date of De-
Mobilisation Remarks
A Key Professional Staff
1 Team Leader cum Sr.
Highway Engineer Mr. Gangadharan C P 30-12-‘11
2 Sr. Bridge Design Engineer
Mr. Magesh Santhanam 17-01-‘12 16-06-‘12
Mr. Nandadulal Dasgupta 07-02-‘13
3 Resident Cum Highway
Engineer Mr. Rajat Parkash Sharma 28-12-‘11
4 Highway Design
Engineer Mr. Dadan Singh 23-08-‘12 11-04-‘14
Manmonths
completed -
Demobilised
5 Bridge/Structural
Engineer Mr. H. Nagaraja Rao 02-02-‘12
6 Sr. Pavement Specialist Mr. Manish Kumar Shah 27-02-‘12
7 Sr. Quality cum Material
Expert Mr. M.V.K. Appa 16-01-‘12
8 Traffic and
Transportation Expert Mr. Krishna Prasad 12-04-‘12
9 Road Safety Expert Mr. Baljit Sidhu 05-09-‘12
10 Finance Expert Mr. Pankaj Sachdeva 13-06-‘12
11 Legal Expert Mr. Sunil Malhotra 21-08-'12
B Sub-Professional
Staff
12 Survey Engineer-1 Mr. Sena Prasad 05-04-‘13 21-04-‘14
Manmonths
completed -
Demobilised
13 Survey Engineer-2 Mr. Suresh Kumar 06-06-‘12
14 Asst. Highway Engr-1
Mr. Ravindra P Dongre 01-03-‘12
Mr. Neeraj Mahadeorao
Patil 28-02-‘14
15 Asst. Highway Engr-2 Mr. Arun Rajan Pillai 17-10`12
16 CAD Expert TBN -
17 Environmental Engineer Mr. Raj Kumar Singh 19-03-‘12
18 Asst. Bridge Engr-1 Mr. Shatrunjay Kumar 09-03-‘12
19 Asst. Bridge Engr-2 Mr. Vinod S Bawankar 19-04-‘12
Sr. Bridge Design Engineer: Mr. Nandadulal Dasgupta
Traffic & Transportation Expert: Mr. Krishna Prasad
Road Safety Expert: Mr. Baljit Sidhu
Highway Design Engineer: (Demobilised)
Financial Expert: Mr. Pankaj Sachdeva
Legal Expert: Mr. Sunil Malhotra
Support Staff:
Office Manager: Mr. Praveen Kumar
Accountant: Ms. Madhumati P Kumar
Cashier: Ms. Reshma Newalkar
Steno: Ms. Jyoti Vishnu Jadhav
Computer Operator:
Photocopy Machine Operator: Mr. Santhosh Sharma
Office Boy: Mr. Aditya Shetye
Guard-1: Mr. Ram Charan Vajpayee
Guard-2: Mr. Ganesh Bhadur
Short Term Sub-Professionals:
Quantity Surveyor: Mr. Satish. N.L HTMS / Toll Expert: TBN
Electrical Engineer: Mr. Anand M Jayaswal
Horticulture cum Landscaping Expert: TBN
CAD Expert: TBN Environmental Engineer: Mr. Raj Kumar
Singh
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February ‘15 Page 35
EPC Contractors
Two EPC Contractors were appointed by the Concessionaire for the
construction of the Project. Details of EPC Contractors are given Table 2.2:
Table 2.2 Details of EPC Contractors
2.2 Plant & Machinery
Table 2.3 Details of Plants Mobilised
Sl No Description Location Capacity
Section-I
1 Laboratory 23+600
2 Stone Crusher Bombay Pada 200 TPH
3 Concrete Batching Plant 23+600 60 Cum /Hr
4 WMM Plant 23+600 200 TPH
5 Hot Mix Plant Bombay Pada 120 TPH
Section-II
6 Laboratory 58+000
7 Stone Crusher 58+000 200 TPH
8 Concrete Batching Plant 58+000 30 Cum /Hr
9 WMM Plant 58+000 200 TPH
10 Hot Mix Plant 58+000 160 TPH
Table 2.4 Details of Machinery
Sl No Description Available
(Nos) Photo
1 JCB 5
Sl No Location EPC Contractor
1 Km 0+000 to 42+000 M/s Mahavir Roads and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
2 Km 42+000 to 84+000 M/s Supreme Infrastructure India Limited
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February ‘15 Page 36
Sl No Description Available
(Nos) Photo
2 Excavator /
Poclain 7
3 Paver 1
4 Grader 2
6 Tippers 15
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February ‘15 Page 37
Sl No Description Available
(Nos) Photo
7 Water Tanker 2
8 Vibratory
Roller 2
9 Transit Mixer 5
10 Plate
Compactors Nil
11 Hydra 2
13 Tandem Roller Nil
14 Pneumatic Tyred Rollers
(PTR)
Nil
15
Emulsion
Sprayer / Browser
1
Concessionaire has demobilised some of the Pavers, Graders, Pneumatic Tyred
Rollers, and Tipper etc. The present set of machinery is insufficient to complete the
project in time.
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February ‘15 Page 38
3.0 PROGRESS OF WORKS
3.1 Land Handing Over
Concession Agreement Vol-I, Clause 10.3 specify that on or prior to the Appointed
Date (that is 19-12-2011), NHAI shall have granted vacant access and Right of Way
such that the Appendix shall not include more than 20% of the total area of the Site
required and necessary for the Four-Laning of Project Highway. Also, NHAI shall
make best efforts to procure and grant, no later than 90 days from Appointed Date
(that is 18-03-2012), the Right of Way to the Concessionaire in respect of all land
included in the Appendix. Total land to be acquired is 504 Ha. At following locations
the construction work is affected due to non-clearance by Forest Department:
Table 3.1 Details of Forest areas
Eco-Sensitive Zone: NHAI vide their letter No. NHAI/PIU/PNVL/BOT/NH-17/PNL-
IND/ECO/2012/1841 dt. 24-12-‘12 has instructed Concessionaire to stop the
Sl No Chainage
Length (m) From To
1 2+545 2+610 65
2 6+300 6+500 200
3 6+500 6+620 120
4 6+620 6+680 60
5 6+850 6+930 80
6 6+960 7+400 440
7 7+500 7+770 270
8 7+850 7+915 65
9 7+915 8+350 435
10 8+600 10+100 1,500
11 10+580 10+625 45
12 10+625 10+640 15
13 10+640 10+680 40
14 11+135 11+275 140
15 11+630 11+900 270
16 11+900 11+950 50
17 12+110 12+220 110
18 12+220 12+580 360
19 12+580 12+925 345
20 12+925 13+130 205
21 13+130 13+250 120
22 13+250 13+565 315
23 13+565 13+620 55
24 13+910 14+120 210
25 14+310 14+575 265
26 15+745 15+775 30
27 15+775 15+790 15
28 16+540 16+800 260
TOTAL 6,085
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February ‘15 Page 39
construction works in the Eco-Sensitive zone (Ch. 0+000 to 20+100). Approval for
non core area (length 16.6 km) of Eco-Sensitive Zone has been obtained. However,
PCCF Maharashtra has asked to obtain NGT approval.
Salt Pan Land (Ch. 31+700 to 33+200): NHAI vide their letter no.
NHAI/PIU/Panvel/PI/SPITPL/2015/2371 dt. 23-02-’15 has informed Concessionaire
regarding handing over of possession of salt plan land.
3.2 Tree Cutting & Plantation
Details of tree cutting are given in Table 3.2. Tree cutting works are in advanced
progress.
Table 3.2 Details of Tree Cutting
Description Scheduled Trees Non-Scheduled Trees Remarks
Total 2390 7964
Removed / Cut 4985
Balance 5369
Table 3.3 Details of Plantation done by Concessionaire
Description Chainage
Status From To
Median Plantation
(Shrubs) - -
Not yet done.
Project construction is still in progress.
Avenue Plantation
(trees) - -
Not yet done.
Project construction is still in progress.
3.3 Details of Utility Shifting
Details of utility shifting is given in Table 3.4 Table 3.4 Details of Utility Shifting
Sl No
Description Total
Length (m) Status
A CIDCO Water Pipe Lines
5080 m CIDCO water pipe line shifting work has recently started.
B Reliance / NOCIL Gas Pipeline
690 m
The exact location of pipeline identified. Concessionaire has to submit proposal by modifying the piers P11 (L), P12 (L), P13 (L) and P15 (R). The abutment A1 may be converted to pier and retaining wall type. The 4” pipe which comes in embankment portion may be encased by utility owner.
C MSEDCL Electrical Lines & Poles (17 DTC Transformers,
4,850m LHS
21,050m RHS
Very slow progress. Out of total 237 crossings, only 3 nos. crossings done so far.
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February ‘15 Page 40
3.4 Design Review
Table 3.5 Design Review
Sl No
Description Status
1 Plan & Profile Drawing Main Carriageway
77.747 Km Concurred. Concessionaire for Ch. 43+000 to 44+000 withdrawn. 3.000 Km (Ch. 7+500 to 10+500) not yet concurred.
2 Plan & Profile Drawing Service Road 19.67 Km. on LHS concurred. 17.42 Km. on RHS Concurred.
3 Structures 746 Nos. drawings concurred.
4 Major Junctions 11 nos are Concurred.
5 Minor junctions 88 nos are Concurred.
6 Quality Assurance Manual Concurred. Two more copies to be submitted by Concessionaire.
7 Health, Safety and Environment Plan Concurred. Two more copies to be submitted by Concessionaire.
8 Environmental Management Plan (EMP) Concessionaire has not submitted EMP incorporating IE’s comments.
9 Construction Programme
Concessionaire has recently submitted request for Extension of Time (EOT) upto Nov ’16. Recently detailed programme submitted which is recommended to NHAI for approval alongwith EOT upto March ’16 (Ch 20+100 to 84+600) and June ’16 (0+000 to 20+100)
10 Borrow Areas for Section-1 18 nos are concurred.
11 Borrow Areas for Section-2 27 nos are concurred.
12 Section - I Concrete mix designs M10,M15, M20, M25, M30,M35,M40, M40-pile, with Natural sand +Crusher sand ,M-45 PSC With 100% Natural sand
24-04-‘14 Retesting done using ultrasonic pulse velocity and rebound hammer.
29 36 20-02-'13 69+140 (RHS) Minor Bridge
Slab
Superstructure staging and scaffolding was carried out without any design and drawing as per Concession Agreement clause no. - 70.11.
20-11-‘13
Staging and scaffolding RFI’s checked by PMC. The design calculation submitted now. Deck slab concreting successfully completed.
30 40 12-04-‘13 2+200
Diversion plan not Submitted for concurrence. Entry/Exit to diversion are not smoothly merged with the existing road causing sag formation at joining. Location of diversion is chosen wrongly; At entry, one electric pole is obstructing the width of diversion. Sign / diversion boards have not been placed properly.
06-05-‘14 The diversion at Ch. 2+200 is closed and four lane is in operation.
31 42 30-04-'13 25+300 (RHS)
Pipe Culvert
Honeycombing is observed in pipe culvert encasing concrete. Due to this reinforcement is exposed.
28-05-'13 Honeycombing repairing done.
32 43 30-04-'13 26+188 (RHS)
PCC is carried out without safe bearing capacity test. Founding level is 1.381m above founding level as per concurred drawing.
03-07-'13
(1) The rock sample at the PCC level where the foundation is to be rest is tested at third party laboratory.
(2) The foundation for Abutment A1 on RHS is resting at level 0.653 m which is 0.95m below design foundation level.
33 44 01-04-'13 39+430 to
39+450 (RHS)
GSB sample collected and tested in Lab and found on coarser side.
05-05-‘14
Joint re-sampling done and observed that GSB material is within specification limits.
34 46 02-05-'13 20+144 (RHS) Balganga P1
M-35 grade concrete cubes has failed for 28 day's
16-07-'13 Rebound hammer test & ultra sonic test
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 57
Sl No.
NCR No
Date Chainage
& Side
Description Rectifications Proposed on
Details of Rectifications Done
Footing strength. conducted and found acceptable.
35 49 16-05-'13 6+490
Diversion plan not submitted to IE for Concurrence. Diversion is sharp and unsafe.
05-05-‘14 The diversion at Ch. 6+490 is closed.
36 51 16-05-'13 38+801 (RHS)
Approach slab not laid as per drawing no. MRIPL/SC/LSD/38+801 R1. It was already intimated wide Letter No. PIP/IE/SPITPL/2013/ 0908 dt. 30-01-’13 and inspection note no-17.
Approach slab not laid as per drawing no. MRIPL/SC/LSD/ 39+030 R1. It was already intimated earlier Letter No. PIP/ IE/SPITPL/2013 /0908 dt. - 30-01-’13 and inspection note no-17.
Approach slab not laid as per drawing no. MRIPL/SC/LSD/ 39+133 R1. It is already intimated wide Letter No. PIP/IE/SPITPL/2013/ 0908 dt. 30-01-’13 and inspection note no-17.
Approach slab not laid as per drawing no. MRIPL/SC/LSD/ 40+564 R1. It was already intimated wide Letter No. PIP/IE/SPITPL/2013/ 0908 dt. 30-01-’13 and inspection note no-17.
Approach slab not laid as per drawing no. MRIPL/SC/LSD/ 40+750 R1. It was already intimated wide Letter No. PIP/IE/SPITPL/2013/ 0908 dt. 30-01-’13 and inspection note no-17.
Approach slab not laid as per drawing no. MRIPL/SC/LSD/ 40+906 R1. It was already intimated wide Letter No. PIP/IE/SPITPL/2013/ 0908 dt. 30-01-’13 and inspection note no-17.
crash barrier wall. surface for crash barrier done as per specifications.
43 59 28-05-'13
Wadkhal Flyover P-31 Foundation
RHS
Reinforcement steel used is brittle and cracks are developed in bending of reinforcement steel (32 mm dia).
10-5-‘14
The reinforcement cage was removed and the foundation P-31 (RHS) is discarded and will not be put in use.
44 60 28-05-'13 4+375 (RHS)
NP4 pipe laid is not fitted and matched properly. Gap is observed in jointing at pipes.
05-07-'13 The finishing of the pipe joint is done as per Specifications.
45 66 17-06-'13 39+920 to
39+930 (RHS)
DBM surface totally damaged (New Construction).
07-06-‘14
Existing damaged DBM surface completely removed and new DBM layer laid.
46 67 18-06-'13 39+130
Box Culvert Settlement near box culvert.
07-06-‘14
Existing damaged DBM surface completely removed and new DBM layer laid.
47 68 18-06-'13 41+110 to
41+120 (RHS) Patches on DBM Surface on new carriageway.
07-06-‘14
Existing damaged DBM surface completely removed and new DBM layer laid.
48 69 18-06-'13 40+210 to
40+220 (RHS) Patches on DBM Surface on new carriageway.
07-06-‘14
Existing damaged DBM surface completely removed and new DBM layer laid.
49 85 23-07-'13 84+488
Indapur Side
The centerline of highway and bridge structure not matching.
13-05-‘14 Works are carried out as per revised plan and profile drawing.
50 87 07-08-'13 Amba Bridge SAIL EQR steel is used for girder reinforcement without source approval.
21-12-‘13
Source approval of steel SAIL TMT EQR accorded as per Letter no. PIP/IE/ SPITPL/2013/1849 dt. 21-12-’13.
51 89 08-08-'13 RE Panel Casting
Lifting hook not been provided with Epoxy Paint.
02-05-‘14
Will be discarding the RE panels (Agency M/s Enviro Geo) and will not be put in use.
52 96 27-08-'13 57+650
RE Block (LHS)
Unapproved cement “SANGHI” is used for casting at RE blocks.
25-11-‘13
Now, the SANGHI cement source approval is concurred vide IE’s letter No. PIP/IE/SPITPL/2013 / 1724 dt. 08-11-‘13
53 97 31-08-‘13 Wadkhal
Flyover J2 outer girder
Prestressing girder is failed during second pre-stressing. Cones have gone inside and cracks have developed on diaphragm. This might have happened due to improper supporting system, poor quality of concrete and improper compaction of concrete.
02-05-‘14
Wadkhal Flyover damaged girder J2 (Casting dt. 05-07-’13) is discarded and will not be put in use.
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 59
Sl No.
NCR No
Date Chainage
& Side
Description Rectifications Proposed on
Details of Rectifications Done
54 98 31-08-‘13 Wadkhal
Flyover J2 outer girder
Prestressing girder is failed during second pre-stressing. Cones have gone inside and cracks have developed on diaphragm. This might have happened due to improper supporting system, poor quality of concrete and improper compaction of concrete.
02-05-‘14
Wadkhal Flyover damaged girder J2 (Casting dt. 30-05-’13) is discarded and will not be put in use.
55 99 01-10-‘13 Wadkhal Flyover
Procedure for CPCC treatment is not being followed. Steel which is being used for reinforcement of Wadkhal girder has rust.
27-05-‘14 CPCC Treatment done and checked through RFI No-55680
56 100 04-10-‘13 Wadkhal
Girder P20 - P21 (LHS)
Anchor cone plate was broken and went inside after second stage stressing. This may be happened due to improper supporting system, poor quality of concrete and improper compaction of concrete.
02-05-‘14
Wadkhal Flyover damaged girder P20 -P21 (LHS) is discarded and will not be put in use.
57 103 07-01-‘14 5+000 VUP
(LHS)
During the concreting it was observed that the concrete mix of M-30G, slump measured 175 mm which is more than the specification limit of 75-125mm. This will affect the quality and durability of the structure.
07-05-‘14
Non-destructive test reports (Rebound Hammer test and Ultra Sonic Pulse Velocity test) conducted and observed that the concrete is of acceptable quality.
58 106 20-01-‘14 42+000 to 84+000
Hume pipes of 1200 mm diameter (NP3) procured for pipe culverts. These are not as per specifications. Also the frequency testing is not being carried out before procurement.
18-03-‘14
The RCC hume pipes intended for the Project were tested. Test results are satisfactory.
59 107 23-01-‘14 15+878
Reinforcement steel not stacked properly. Major stock of the steel is lying on the ground which leads to the corrosion.
25-05-‘14
The steel was re-stacked and checked through RFI No. 27298 dt. 08-02-2014
60 110 28-01-‘14
RE Panel Casting in Section-I
Casting Yard
Curing is not carried out on RE panel which is stacked in the casting yard. Further casting date is not mentioned in RE panels. This will effect the quality & durability of the RE panel.
10-05-‘14
Non-destructive test reports (Rebound Hammer test and Ultra Sonic Pulse Velocity test) conducted and observed that the concrete is of acceptable quality.
61 118 19-02-‘14 26+188 (RHS) Bhogeshwari
Concreting is carried out from transit mixer which
07-07-‘14 Cube compressive
strength results are
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 60
Sl No.
NCR No
Date Chainage
& Side
Description Rectifications Proposed on
Details of Rectifications Done
Bridge P1 & P2 crash barrier
parked on existing bridge without any safety measures. Also it is observed that concrete poured in chute without proper angle. This improper way of concreting is not acceptable.
acceptable.
Concessionaire confirmed that the traffic police was deployed to control the traffic movement. However, the Concessionaire is warned about the safety aspects during such works in future.
62 120 21-04-‘14 42+155 (RHS)
Unapproved/unsuitable soil dumped in the Panvel side approach of PUP at Ch. 42+155 (Kasu). This was notified during site inspection on 12-04-‘2014.
28-07-‘14
Un-approved material removed and balance material tested and found within acceptable limits.
63 126 21-04-‘14 42+155 (RHS)
RE wall backfill material laid without approval of the material.
19-07-‘14
The Third party test results for RE wall fill material conducted at SSA Lbs. Pvt. Ltd and found within specifications.
Table 4.2 Status of NCR’s Issued by Independent Engineer (Not yet closed out)
Sl No.
NCR No
Date Chainage
& Side
Description Rectifications Proposed
on
Details of Rectifications Done
1 25 22-06-'12
21+200 to 21+890 Diversion
(RHS)
Diversion Plan not concurred and No Sign Board Provided.
2 26 22-06-'12 80+040 (RHS)
DBM Works without Removal of Electric Pole Ch. 80+040 (RHS) Main Carriageway.
3 28 16-07-'12 44+194
Nigade bridge A2 Raft.
Concreting was carried out With excavator and Chute without planning. Height of fall of concrete is more than 1.5 m and concrete is totally segregated. Due to delay placing of concrete, cold joints were formed and rain protection is not done.
4 31 22-11-'12 78+200 to 78+510 (RHS)
DBM Carried without Casting of Kerb, Development of Cracks, and DBM thickness is not adequate.
5 33 23-01-'13 68+988 Minor
Bridge
Highway alignment & structure alignment not matching
6 34 30-01-'13 52+155 (RHS) Minor Bridge
Honeycombing in Pier, 7th lift. This might have
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 61
Sl No.
NCR No
Date Chainage
& Side
Description Rectifications Proposed
on
Details of Rectifications Done
happened due to improper support, vibration and poor quality of concrete.
7 35 04-01-'13 23+650 (RHS)
Retaining wall under construction without concurrence of design & drawings. Provision for existing Pipe culvert on the retaining wall not provided.
8 37 20-02-'13 69+140 (RHS) Minor Bridge
Slab
SANGAM steel is used for reinforcement of deck slab without source approval.
9 38 21-02-'13 57+533
Box Culvert
The vertical main bars and slab main reinforcement SUN - TMX Un - approved steel used.
10 39 02-04-‘13
80+850 to 80+890 (Fresh Kerb Casting) and 80+890 to 81+140 (Old Laid Kerb) -
Casting of Kerb after cutting already laid DBM resulting in gap between Kerb and DBM. Development of crack on freshly laid Kerb. Saw cut grooves not made in the previously laid / old Kerb, development of cracks. No curing arrangement / application of curing compound.
11 41 17-04-‘13 24+550 to 24+730 (RHS)
DBM levels checked and found beyond permissible limits.
12 45 01-04-'13 52+335
Slab Culvert Slab culvert is widened on RHS side with pipe culvert.
13 47 03-05-'13 0+530 to 1+020
Diversion plan not submitted to IE for Concurrence. Entry (LHS) is very close to Minor bridge (km 0+545), where width is restricted due to construction of RCC crash barriers. Earthen shoulders in the entire stretch has not been made fully on LHS and RHS widening towards, existing road.
14 48 03-05-'13 25+330 to
25+900 (RHS)
Diversion plan not submitted to IE for Concurrence. Entry/exit are not smooth with sufficient length. Possible chances for overtopping of loaded vehicle coming from Indapur side and going towards Panvel while shifting from new carriageway to existing carriageway through
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 62
Sl No.
NCR No
Date Chainage
& Side
Description Rectifications Proposed
on
Details of Rectifications Done
insufficient length of merging due to big level difference and sharp turning towards left.
15 50 16-05-'13 0+544
DBM is laid on deck slab of minor bridge. (As per concurred drawing wearing course consists of 25 mm thick mastic asphalt overlaid by bituminous concrete).
16 58 28-05-'13 29+610 (LHS)
Non - removal of tree stump located at the left edge of existing road is safety hazard.
17 61 31-05-'13 70+560 (RHS)
NP4 pipe laid is not fitted and matched properly. Gap is observed in jointing of pipes and PCC is partially done below pipe.
18 62 14-06-'13
Due to improper stacking of RCC girders, one of the girder is tilled. It will affect the quality and safety of the structure.
Damage of DBM Edges due to Non Construction of Proper earthen Shoulders to left hand Carriageway.
23 71 19-06-'13 46+620 (RHS)
Damage of DBM towards Shoulder and lack of protection made to the slope of return wall of structure.
24 72 19-06-'13 0+000 to 42+800
Diversions provided on Project road are not conforming to IRC: SP: 55 and IRC: SP: 84.
25 73 19-06-'13 2+400 (RHS) and 2+780
(LHS)
DBM Settlement in the full width of New Carriageway.
26 74 19-06-'13 42+000 to 84+000
Diversions provided on Project road are not conforming to IRC: SP: 55 and IRC: SP: 84.
27 75 16-07-'13 53+661 (RHS)
“Vaishnav Prime” Steel used in slab Box culvert and it’s working drawing not
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 63
Sl No.
NCR No
Date Chainage
& Side
Description Rectifications Proposed
on
Details of Rectifications Done
submitted for IE’s Concurrence.
28 76 18-07-'13 81+606
Vave Bridge
Highway alignment and bridge alignment appears to be not matching.
29 77 19-07-'13 44+119
Nigade Bridge
Pile foundation work is carried out without conducting the initial pile load test and routine pile load test at P2 & P4 locations as per Clause-1113 of MoRTH specifications.
30 78 19-07-'13 15+480
Kharpada Bridge
Pile foundation work is carried out without conducting the initial pile load test and routine pile load test at A1, P1, P3, P4 & P5 locations as per Clause-1113 of MoRTH specifications.
31 79 22-07-'13 57+976 Patansai
The centerline of highway and bridge structure not matching. Center line of alignment not checked.
32 80 22-07-'13 62+348
Local Nallah
The centerline of highway and bridge structure not matching. Center line of alignment not checked.
33 81 22-07-'13 69+140 Local
Nallah
The centerline of highway and bridge structure not matching. Center line of alignment not checked.
34 82 23-07-'13 77+804
Bhuwan Bridge
The centerline of highway and bridge structure not matching. Center line of alignment not checked.
35 83 23-07-'13 52+089
Nidi Bridge
The centerline of highway and bridge structure not matching. Center line of alignment not checked.
36 84 23-07-'13 63+300
Local Nallah
The centerline of highway and bridge structure not matching. Center line of alignment not checked.
37 86 02-08-'13 15+878
kharpada bridge
Girder G-2 stacked improperly on ground. Supports are not provided on bearing point of girder and supports are sunk, due to poor ground strata. Cracks also observed on surface of girder, diaphragm wall reinforcement are bent.
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 64
Sl No.
NCR No
Date Chainage
& Side
Description Rectifications Proposed
on
Details of Rectifications Done
38 88 07-08-'13 Pali Plant
“VAISHNAVI PRIME” steel is used for reinforcement of friction slab and crash barrier without source approval.
39 90 08-08-'13
Wadkhal Flyover girder
(J-2 outer 7 no.)
Precast girder is lifted and shifted to the stacking yard without carrying the grouting operation of cable. Further, support provided below girder is not proper. This will affect the quality and durability of structure.
40 91 21-08-'13
Wadkhal Flyover girder
No-1 to 9 (J-2 outer)
Pre-stressed girder concrete for Wadkhal Flyover was done with 100 % crusher sand.
41 92 21-08-'13 15+878 (RHS)
SAIL EQR and VAISHNAV Prime steel used in G-A type (P-12 to P-13) girder without source approval. There is no CPCC treatment carried out on reinforcement.
42 93 27-08-'13
26+188 Bhogeshwari
Bridge (RHS)
“VAISHNAV Prime” steel used in deck slab (P4- P5) Without source approval. Also concrete slump observed at site is 180 mm. This is not acceptable as per MoRTH specification Clause-81704.1.
43 94 27-08-'13
26+188 Bhogeshwari
Bridge (RHS)
Structure cracks formed at the girder no. G4 (P5-A2) span near A2 side bearing.
44 95 27-08-'13 23+450 to 23 +480 (RHS)
Work carried out for the wall without concurrence of drawing. Also, SBC test is not carried out for foundation strata.
45 101 20-11-‘13 Minor/Major
Bridge Location
Crash barrier/hard rails are missing / broken in many locations. This is dangerous for the traffic and road users.
46 102 02-12-‘13
57+976 RHS Patansai
Bridge
The centerline of highway and bridge are not matching. The issue was notified many times, NCR No-79 already issued, slab is cast, and Centerline is still not modified.
47 104 07-01-‘14 5+000 (LHS)
Unapproved steel Vaishnav Prime TMT steel is used in Raft without concurrence
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 65
Sl No.
NCR No
Date Chainage
& Side
Description Rectifications Proposed
on
Details of Rectifications Done
from IE. Concreting of raft also done without concurrence.
48 105 18-01-‘14 22+800
Pipe Culvert
Pipe culvert at Ch. 22+800 is not constructed. Road work including WMM is completed at above location without construction of pipe culvert required as per Concession Agreement and concurred drawing.
49 108 27-01-‘14 27+100 (LHS)
Concreting of raft foundation is abruptly stopped due to shortage of cement. Due to this cold joint formed more than 50% area of raft which is structurally unsafe. Further concreting is resumed after more than 10 hours without concurrence of IE.
50 109 27-01-‘14
26+188 Bhogeshawari
Bridge Abutment A2
& Independent Return Wall.
Filter media behind abutment A2 is being laid without cleaning of weep holes.
51 111 30-01-‘14
26+188 (RHS)
Bhogeshwari Bridge
Major honey combing was observed in the bottom of I girder of P1-P2 span of Bhogeshwari bridge. This might have happened due to poor quality concrete and improper vibration.
52 112 30-01-‘14 38+245 to 39+380 (LHS)
DBM first layer had been laid from 38+245 to 39+380 (LHS) and diversion. During routine lab testing retained stability was found 67.42%, which is less than the required minimum stability (80% as per MoRTH).
53 113 30-01-‘14
22+705 to 22+900
(RHS) DBM
DBM is having very high marshall stability (2300 kg against the design of 1150 kg). The flow observed is 75 mm against the MoRTH value of 2-4 mm.
54 114 30-01-‘14
38+800 to 41+600 (LHS) and 22+700 to 22+900 (RHS)
Pneumatic Tyred Roller (PTR) has not been used for DBM compaction as per approved method statement.
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 66
Sl No.
NCR No
Date Chainage
& Side
Description Rectifications Proposed
on
Details of Rectifications Done
55 115 04-02-‘14 45+751 (LHS)
Structural cracks developed on the independent retaining wall (Panvel side) 3rd lift. This might have happened due to non-curing of structure.
56 116 04-02-‘14 60+984 (RHS)
Pipe culvert at above chainage is constructed without concurrence of working drawing. Also, it appears that pipe culvert top level is above Finished Road Level.
57 117 12-02-‘14 0+000 to 84+000
Drawing for applicable typical cross sections not yet submitted in spite of several reminders. This is very important during Project execution.
58 119 01-03-‘14 66+808 (RHS)
PCC and foundation is carried out without establishing/ confirming safe bearing capacity of foundation strata.
59 121 21-04-‘14
69+200 to 69+340 (RHS) & 69+800 to
69+900 (RHS).
Bituminous Concrete laid without constructing kerb.
60 122 21-04-‘14 58+040 (RHS)
(1) Kink formation due to abrupt merging of kerb near structure location. (2) Kerb line is out of alignment and not matching as per the latest concurred drawings.
61 123 21-04-‘14 61+330 to 61+410 (RHS)
Heaps of WMM mix dumped directly on the Bed of WMM first layer couple of days ago. The moisture from the WMM mix has already been dried up whereas it was required to be placed and rolled at a moisture content +1 or -2% of OMC.
62 124 21-04-‘14 44+155
Nigade (RHS)
Even after several reminders initial pile load test is not carried out. Further piling/ sub structure work is carried out at P2 and P4 locations without doing the initial and routine pile load tests.
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 67
Sl No.
NCR No
Date Chainage
& Side
Description Rectifications Proposed
on
Details of Rectifications Done
63 125 21-04-‘14 15+878 (LHS)
Even after several reminders initial pile load test is not carried out. Further piling/ substructure work is carried out at A1, P1, P3, P4, P5, P22, P23 and P24 locations without doing the initial and routine pile load tests.
64 127 21-04-‘14 70+227
Bituminous Concrete is laid on culvert slab and approach slab without laying mastic asphalt.
65 128 21-04-‘14 69+849
Bituminous Concrete is laid on culvert slab and approach slab without laying mastic asphalt.
66 129 21-04-‘14 57+976 (RHS)
Settlement of DBM and development of Cracks towards shoulder of freshly laid DBM in the approach to the minor bridge.
67 130 21-04-‘14 69+200 to 70+380 (RHS)
Surface Regularity Test not Carried Out Over DBM Surface - BC carried out in the above stretch without conducting the surface regularity test over the previously laid DBM surface.
68 131 21-04-‘14 26+188
Bhogeshwari bridge (RHS)
Abutment A2 Retaining Wall, it is observed that weep hole is not provided/cleaned before placing of filter media as per concurred drawing.
69 132 21-04-‘14 26+188
Bhogeshwari bridge (RHS)
Unapproved VAISHNAV 500 PRIME steel is used for reinforcement.
70 133 21-04-‘14 30+930 VUP Raft (RHS)
Unapproved SUN TMX and VAISHNAV 500 PRIME steel is used for reinforcement.
71 134 21-04-‘14 28+535 ROB R/w
(LHS)
Unapproved SUN TMX and VAISHNAV 500 PRIME steel is used for reinforcement.
72 135 21-04-‘14 71+000 to
71+050 (RHS)
Laying temperature of BC in the above stretch was checked and found 75.4° C, which is much below the required temperature as per MoRTH specifications.
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 68
Sl No.
NCR No
Date Chainage
& Side
Description Rectifications Proposed
on
Details of Rectifications Done
73 136 13-05-‘14
Kharpada Bridge G-1 Type 5/5 G. No-21 at Ch.
15+828
Compressive strength of M45 grade concrete found less than 45N/mm2 for 28 days strength testing (observed strength 39.56 N/mm2). The data recorded during test is enclosed.
74 137 13-05-‘14 Diversion at
Ch. 52+250 to 53+380
Diversion plan not submitted for IE’s concurrence. Diversion made at site is not as per IRC:SP:55 & Clause-112 of MoRTH specifications. Entry/Exit are not smooth.
75 138 13-05-‘14
Diversion at Ch.59+900 to
61+260
Diversion plan not submitted for IE’s concurrence. Diversion made at site is not as per IRC:SP:55 & Clause-112 of MoRTH specifications. Entry/Exit are not smooth.
76 139 13-05-‘14
Diversion at Ch. 69+200 to
71+990.
Diversion plan not submitted for IE’s concurrence. Diversion made at site is not as per IRC:SP:55 & Clause-112 of MoRTH specifications. Entry/Exit are not smooth.
77 140 23-05-‘14 Many locations
in Section-II
Excavated bituminous material spread over shoulder at many locations in section-II, which is a major environmental hazard. This was intimated through letter, site inspection etc many times. However, the same system is still being followed, which is highly un-acceptable.
78 141 26-05-‘14 46+500 (LHS). Shoulder not constructed and no Safety Barrier provided.
79 142 26-05-‘14 GSB at Ch. 52+500 to
52+750 (LHS)
GSB being spread haphazardly using JCB/Poclain and not with grader. The material used for GSB seems to be mixed with WMM material and not uniform. This is against the specifications and good engineering practice.
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 69
Sl No.
NCR No
Date Chainage
& Side
Description Rectifications Proposed
on
Details of Rectifications Done
80 143 26-05-‘14
WMM IInd Layer at Ch. 52+000 to
53+100 (LHS)
WMM IInd layer material directly dumped on the Ist layer and not being placed uniformly with paver and compacted immediately at OMC. This is against the specifications and Good Engineering Practice.
81 144 30-05-‘14 Kharpada
Bridge P5 Pier Cap
During site inspection it was observed that 16 mm, 12 mm, 10 mm, Vaishnav Prime TMT Steel is used for pier cap reinforcement. CPCC treatment not carried out properly.
82 145 30-05-‘14
Deck Slab of Nallah
diversion Ch. 4+930 to
4+950 (RHS)
Unapproved Vaishnav Prime TMT steel is used in pile Cap without source approval. CPCC of steel is not carried out properly.
83 146 30-05-‘14
Pier P3 Pile cap of
Kharpada Bridge
Unapproved steel Vaishnav Prime TMT was used in deck slab without source approval. CPCC of the steel is not carried out properly. Cover to the reinforcement not as per concurred drawing. Formwork, joint are not Leak proof and strong.
84 147 12-06-‘14
Pier Kharpada Bridge at Ch. 15+878- Pier P-9 to P-10
No safety arrangements are done at girder launching location. Gangway with handrail not constructed over pier cap. Ladder erected to inspect launching activity is very steep and without any hand rail. This is very dangerous and major safety hazard.
85 148 01-07-‘14
P11-P12 Girder No-25 & 26 Inner
Girder- Kharpada
Bridge
VAISHNAV 500 Prime steel is used for reinforcement. The above reinforcement steel source approve is not concurred by IE.
86 149 01-07-‘14
VUP Hamarapur at Ch. 23+460 (RHS) Raft
During site inspection of VUP Hamarapur raft, it is observed that VAISHNAV 500 Prime steel is used for reinforcement. The above reinforcement steel source approve is not concurred by IE.
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 70
Sl No.
NCR No
Date Chainage
& Side
Description Rectifications Proposed
on
Details of Rectifications Done
87 150 02-07-‘14 0+990 to
1+500
Road work carried out not as per concurred plan, profile and cross section drawings.
88 151 02-07-‘14 17+600 to
18+400
Road work carried out not as per concurred plan, profile and cross section drawings.
89 152 03-07-‘14 55+640 to
55+950
Road work carried out not as per concurred plan, profile and cross section drawings.
90 153 17-07-‘14
Box Culvert (Widening -
Service Road) at Ch. 41+960
(RHS)
“VAISHANV PRIME Steel 10 mm, 12mm, 16mm dia bar used in deck slab reinforcement. Vaishnav Prime steel source not concurred by IE.
91 154 18-07-‘14
Damage of DBM on New Carriageway
Ch. 61+090 to 61+150 (RHS)
DBM damaged badly on the stretch of new carriageway on RHS.
92 155 19-07-‘14
Development of many
Potholes/distress in BC in the stretch
Ch. 45+860 to 47+800 (LHS)
MCW
Several potholes/cracks have been developed in the newly laid BC at Ch. 45+870, 45+990, 46+470, 46+600, 46+760, 47+000, 47+040, 47+050, 47+250, 47+360 to 47+390, 47+10, 47+660.
93 156 22-08-‘14 Slab Culvert Ch. 77+997
(LHS)
Shoulder not constructed and no safety barrier provided (in spite of several reminders) at culvert.
94 157 22-08-‘14 Slab Culvert Ch. 78+167
(LHS)
No safety barrier provided (in spite of several reminders) and shoulder not constructed.
95 158 23-08-‘14
Deck Slab Reinforcement
VUP at Ch. 27+755 (LHS)
Un-approved “VAISHNAV PRIME TMT” steel is used in deck slab of VUP without source approval. CPCC treatment for steel is not carried out properly.
96 159 23-08-‘14 Box Culvert at Ch. 39+133
(LHS)
No safety barrier provided (in spite of several reminders) and shoulder not constructed.
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 71
Sl No.
NCR No
Date Chainage
& Side
Description Rectifications Proposed
on
Details of Rectifications Done
97 160 23-08-‘14 Median Drain at Ch. 80+700
to 81+100
(1) Work executed without concurrence of median drain drawings. (2) The cross chutes are constructed perpendicular to the highway which is not correct and not acceptable.
98 161 23-08-‘14
Development of Many
potholes/patches in the
newly laid BC at Ch. 69+200
to 71+800 (RHS)
Development of many potholes/patches in the newly laid BC at Ch. 69+200 to 69+380, 69+760 to 69+780, 69+965, 70+120 to 70+180, 70+570 & 71+040 and increasing day by day.
99 162 23-09-‘14
Pali Concrete Batching Plant at Ch. 66+545
to 66+599 (RHS)
PQC M(40) - The proportion of ingredients for PQC produced is different from mix design.
100 163 24-09-‘14 Badly
Distressed DBM locations
Badly Distressed DBM locations:
(1) 0+540 to 0+920 (LHS).
(2) 1+740 to 1+780 (LHS).
(3) 1+990 to 2+050 (RHS).
(4) 3+530 to 3+560 (LHS).
(5) 22+680 to 22+710 (RHS).
(6) 22+800 to 23+200 (RHS)
(7) 22+380 to 22+400 (RHS).
(8) 40+520 to 40+535 (LHS)
101 164 24-09-‘14 Badly
Distressed DBM locations
Badly Distressed DBM locations:
(1) 40+410 to 40+940 (LHS).
(2) 41+250 to 41+470 (LHS).
(3) 41+880 to 41+920 (LHS).
(4) 43+200 to 43+500 (LHS).
(5) 43+350 to 43+400 (RHS)
(6) 46+070 to 46+150 (RHS).
(7) 46+350 to 46+400 (RHS).
(8) 48+200 to 48+600 (LHS).
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 72
Sl No.
NCR No
Date Chainage
& Side
Description Rectifications Proposed
on
Details of Rectifications Done
102 165 24-09-‘14 Badly
Distressed DBM locations
Badly Distressed DBM locations:
(1) 52+240 to 52+590 (RHS).
(2) 53+210 to 53+240 (RHS).
(3) 54+930 to 60+060 (RHS).
(4) 60+190 to 60+210 (RHS).
(5) 61+150 to 61+230 (RHS).
(6) 63+450 to 63+850 (LHS).
(7) 63+730 to 63+530 (RHS).
(8) 69+530 to 69+600 (LHS).
103 166 24-09-‘14 Badly
Distressed DBM locations
Badly Distressed DBM locations:
(1) 77+880 to 77+910 (RHS).
(2) 77+900 to 78+800 (LHS).
(3) 78+300 to 78+310 (RHS).
(4) 79+780 to 81+120 (LHS).
(5) 80+120 to 80+160 (RHS).
(6) 80+200 to 80+300 (RHS).
(7) 80+400 to 80+500 (RHS).
(8) 80+700 to 80+750 (RHS).
104 167 24-09-‘14 Badly
Distressed DBM locations
Badly Distressed DBM locations:
(1) 81+000 to 81+500 (RHS).
(2) 81+250 to 81+450 (LHS).
(3) 82+730 to 83+020 (RHS).
(4) 82+880 to 82+940 (LHS).
105 168 29-09-‘14
Box Culvert Retaining Wall At Ch. 51+690
(LHS)
Concreting of retaining wall raft (Panvel side LHS is carried out without vibrators (Compaction not carried out). Also Vaishanv Prime steel is used in reinforcement for which source is not concurred.
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 73
Sl No.
NCR No
Date Chainage
& Side
Description Rectifications Proposed
on
Details of Rectifications Done
106 169 09-10-‘14 Box culvert at Ch. 45+977
(LHS)
Crash barrier finished concrete surface is not in line and level and totally bulged. This might have happened due to improper support and formwork is not strong. Honeycombing also observed in retaining wall 4th lift.
107 170 15-11-‘14 Slab culvert at Ch. 82+583
(LHS)
Unapproved steel Vaishnav Prime TMT used in crash barrier without concurrence from IE.
108 171 15-11-‘14
Median Drain at Ch. 69+980 to 70+350 & 82+900 to 84+300
(1) Work executed without concurrence of design and drawing.
(2) Proper curing is not done, several cracks developed in median drain wall and bottom PCC.
109 172 15-11-‘14
Median Drain at Ch. 45+890 to 46+120, 46+300 to 46+610, 47+210 to 47+620 and 52+330 to 52+670-
(1) Work executed without concurrence of design and drawing.
(2) Proper curing is not done, several cracks developed in median drain wall and bottom PCC.
110 173 19-11-‘14
Retaining Wall Raft at Ch. 23+400 to
23+410 (RHS)
“Vaishnav Prime TMT-500” steel is used for raft reinforcement without source approval. CPCC has not been carried out properly.
111 174 19-11-‘14
Retaining Wall Raft at Ch. 23+473 to
23+490 (LHS)
“Vaishnav Prime TMT-500” steel is used for raft reinforcement without source approval.
112 175 26-11-‘14 Retaining Wall at Ch. 83+920
(RHS)
Concreting done with chute having height of fall more than 1.5 m and concrete is totally segregated. This is not acceptable as per MoRTH specifications.
113 176 09-12-‘14
Approaches to Pen ROB- broken &
missing railing on either
sides-safety hazard
Railing provided on either sides of the approaches to pen ROB are found to be broken/missing at many places resulting into a major safety hazard to the road users. Concessionaire have not done the barricading in
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 74
Sl No.
NCR No
Date Chainage
& Side
Description Rectifications Proposed
on
Details of Rectifications Done
spite of several reminders.
114 177 09-12-‘14
Improper barricading at Ch. 22+600 to
23+250 (LHS)- safety
hazard
Deep road cutting on LHS improper and non-continuous barricading is provided causing safety hazard to the road users. Concessionaire have not provided crash barrier in spite of several reminders.
115 178 15-12-‘14
Retaining Wall Raft at Ch. 23+510 to
23+530 (RHS)
In spite of availability of concrete pump, concreting of raft was carried out using chute. Due to this, concrete is segregated and honey-combing developed. Reinforcement also not covered with concrete.
116 179 22-12-‘14
DBM top Level Checking
Ch. 40+220 to 40+780 (RHS) - RFI No. 6556 Ch. 51+920 to 52+090 (RHS) - RFI No. 22251. Ch. 57+360 to 57+510 (RHS) - RFI No. 22438.
With reference to above mentioned RFI’s, levels of DBM top surface were checked and found beyond permissible limits. These were intimated for rectification vide Our letter no. PIP/IE/SPITPL / 2014 / 2243 dated. 28-04-2014 but no rectification is carried out till date.
117 180 24-12-‘14
Section-I-Non Calibration of
Lab Equipments and Plant
Due date of machinery and plant calibration are finished and they are not re-calibrated.
118 181 24-01-‘15
Box Culvert Retaining wall
Raft at Ch. 51+690 (RHS).
Following deficiencies observed in formwork and reinforcement of foundation:
(1) Bottom cover is 20 mm only.
(2) Shuttering is not provided on One side.
(3) Totally waterlogged.
(4) Reinforcement lapping is not provided.
(5) Vaishnav Prime steel is used. (This source was never concurred).
In spite of above deficiencies, concreting was carried out.
(2) All ‘Working Zone’ must be provided with adequate lateral & longitudinal buffer
clearances as per IRC-SP-55.
(3) Workers at site must be provided with necessary PPE viz., Safety Shoe, Gloves,
Jackets, etc.
(4) Traffic Diversions are potential accident spots since vehicles approach the
diversions at high speeds. Appropriate temporary signs, delineators, blinkers,
New Jersey barriers & barricades must be provided at the diversions and at
proper locations to guide the vehicles to safety before passing by the work
zones.
(5) The Concessionaire have been advised to comply the deficiencies observed in
the traffic safety measures taken.
(6) Traffic diversions are potential accident spots during construction period.
Necessary signs to be provided at such locations. Many of the diversions
provided at site are sharp and not with proper geometry which leads to
accidents. Many letters are issued to Concessionaire to rectify the safety issues
at site.
5.2 Accident data
The accident data is given in Appendix-I.
5.3 Maintenance of Existing Highway
Concessionaire is being advised to maintain the existing highway to traffic-worthy
condition. Site Inspection notes / letters are issued to Concessionaire in this regard.
Many potholes / patches were observed on the Project Highway. Further, advices
were given to the Concessionaire to maintain the hand rail of structures, vents of
structures etc. But, The Concessionaire is not maintaining the Project highway
properly in spite of several reminders.
Concession Agreement, Vol-I, Clause-12.2 specifies that “During the construction
period the Concessionaire shall maintain, at its cost, the existing lane(s) of the
Project Highways so that the traffic worthiness and safety thereof are at no time
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 83
materially inferior as compared to their condition 7 (Seven) days prior to the date of
this Agreement, and shall undertake the necessary repair and maintenance works for
this purpose; provided that the Concessionaire may, at its cost, interrupt and divert
the flow of traffic if such interruption and diversion is necessary for the efficient
progress of Construction Works and conforms to Good Industry Practice; provided
further that such interruption and diversion shall be undertaken by the
Concessionaire only with the prior written approval of the Independent Engineer
which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. For the avoidance of doubt, it is
agreed that the Concessionaire shall at all times be responsible for ensuring safe
operation of the Project Highway.”
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 84
6.0 CONTRACTUAL ISSUES
6.1 Change of Scope
The Details of Change of Scope proposals considered are given in Table 6.1. The Change of
Scope Proposal rejected by Independent Engineer are given in Table 6.2.
Table 6.1 Details of Change of Scope Proposals considered:
Sl No
Description of Change of Scope
Appr. Cost Implication
(Rs. Crores)
Status
1 Deletion of Palaspe Flyover at Ch. 0+260
(-) 28.30** Approved in principle by NHAI. Concessionaire has not submitted detailed quantities in proper order so far.
2 Nallah diversion through box culvert at Ch. 4+900 to 4+993
(+) 3.449* Clarifications are yet to be submitted by Concessionaire. Change of Scope is pending at NHAI HQ.
3 Mitigation Measures in Karnala Bird Sanctuary Area.
(+) 55.88 **
NHAI has approved in principle. Concessionaire was advised to submit detailed proposal. However, NBWL’s clearance not yet obtained.
4 Shifting the location of Jite PUP (from Ch. 18+240 to 18+700)
Nil NHAI has approved this Change of Scope with no Financial implication
5 Deletion of pipe culvert at Ch. 22+798
- Concessionaire is advised to submit clarifications.
6 VUP at 23+450 (Hamarapur) on RHS main carriageway.
-
Proposal to be modified by Concessionaire considering that the additional VUP (as envisaged in CA) to be constructed at this location. Concessionaire is advised to submit details.
7 Underpasses in Pen City (+) 8.38 * Approved in principle by NHAI.
8 Change in number of spans of ROB at Pen Ch. 28+283
(+) 14.25 * Recommended to NHAI. Clarifications also sent to NHAI. Pending with NHAI.
9 Increase in length of Wadkhal Bypass by 805m
(+) 0.81 * Approved in principle by NHAI.
10 Increase in Span for Structure at Ch. 38+336 and Ch. 43+133
(+) 0.6663 * Change of Scope proposal recommended to NHAI. Clarifications submitted to NHAI. Pending with NHAI, HQ.
11 Additional Culverts at various locations
(+) 2.52 * Approved in principle by NHAI.
12 Increase in Length of Service Road
Nil Recommended to NHAI. Clarifications submitted to NHAI. Pending with NHAI, RO.
13 Exit/entry Ramps at the Start and End of Service Road
- Concessionaire yet to submit the compliances.
* Excluding overhead cost claimed by Concessionaire.
** Including Overhead Cost.
Table 6.2 Details of Change of Scope Proposals Rejected by Independent Engineer
Sl No
Description of Change of Scope
Appr. Cost Implication
(Rs. Crores)
Status
1 Nallah diversion through box (+) 7.6147 * Sufficient land available for diversion of
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 85
Sl No
Description of Change of Scope
Appr. Cost Implication
(Rs. Crores)
Status
culvert at Ch. 4+700 to 4+800 and 5+700 to 5+800.
Nallah. Accordingly, Change of Scope is not admissible.
2 Retaining wall at Ch. 16+720 to 16+870 (LHS & 23+430 to 23+480 (LHS)
(+) 1.07 * In both the stretches the ROW available is 60m. Hence Change of Scope is not admissible.
3 Retaining Wall at Ch. 23+400 to 23+640 (RHS)
(+) 1.95 *
Concessionaire has not followed the procedures for Change of Scope. CIDCO water pipeline at this location was already buried in embankment without any protection measures. Thus, Change of scope not admissible.
4 Wadkhal Bypass by changing ROB to RUB
(+) 20.63 Concessionaire is advised to construct ROB as per provisions of Concession Agreement.
5 Reconstruction of Damaged Slab culvert at Ch 39+030 & 39+133
(+) 0.265 * Change of scope not admissible as it comes under rehabilitation.
6
Additional VUP on both ends of Amba Bridge. (Pali Junction at Ch. 58+660 and Roha/ Alibaug Junction at Ch. 58+960)
(+) 23.38 * NHAI has rejected the proposal and advised Concessionaire to proceed as per Concession Agreement.
7
Difference in width of median for approach to Underpasses / Flyovers / ROB etc Type - X Section
- Rejected as it is not admissible as per Concession Agreement provisions
8 Concrete pavement below RUB at Ch. 56+560 (Nagothane)
- Rejected as it is required as per site conditions and vertical clearance requirements.
* Excluding overhead cost.
Our records show that Concessionaire has not submitted necessary clarifications /details
for the following Changes of Scope in spite of several reminders:
Sl No
Description of Change of Scope
Status
1 Deletion of Palaspe Flyover at Ch. 0+260
Approved in principle by NHAI. Concessionaire has not submitted detailed quantities in proper order so far.
2 Nallah diversion through box culvert at Ch. 4+900 to 4+993
Clarifications are yet to be submitted by Concessionaire.
3 Deletion of pipe culvert at Ch. 22+798
Concessionaire is advised to submit clarifications.
4 VUP at 23+450 (Hamarapur) on RHS main carriageway.
Proposal to be modified by Concessionaire considering that the additional VUP (as envisaged in CA) to be constructed at this location. Concessionaire is advised to submit details.
5 Underpasses in Pen City Approved in principle by NHAI. Concessionaire has not submitted detailed quantities so far.
6 Additional Culverts at various locations
Approved in principle by NHAI. Concessionaire has not submitted detailed quantities so far.
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 86
Sl No
Description of Change of Scope
Status
7 Exit/Entry Ramps at Start and End of Service road
Compliance to the observations not yet submitted.
6.2 Project Milestones
Project Milestone - I
The Concessionaire has to achieve Project Milestone - I by 19-12-2012 as per
Schedule - G of the Concession Agreement. They have requested/applied for shifting
the date of Project Milestone - I for a period of 135 days. The Independent Engineer
advised the Concessionaire to submit the details of actual progress (both Physical &
Financial) with substantiating supporting details to enable Independent Engineer to
critically analyse the case.
Concession Agreement, Clause-13.4, Specify that ”Without prejudice to the provision
of Clause 12.4.2 if the Concessionaire does not achieve any of Project Milestone or
the Independent Engineer shall have reasonably determined that the rate of Progress
of Construction works is such that Four-Laning is not likely to be achieved by the
Scheduled Four-laning date, it shall notify the Concessionaire to this effect, and the
Concessionaire shall, within 15 (fifteen) days of such notice, by a communication
inform the Independent Engineer in reasonable detail about the steps it proposes to
take to expedite Progress and the period within which it shall achieve the Project
Completion Date”.
Concession Agreement Clause-12.4.2 Specify that “The Concessionaire shall construct
the Project Highway in accordance with the Project completion Schedule set forth in
Schedule-G. In the invent that the Concessionaire fails to achieve any Project
Milestone within the period of 90 (Ninety) days from the date set forth for such
Milestone in Schedule-G, unless such failure has occurred due to force Majeure or for
reasons solely attributable to the Authority, it shall pay Damages to the Authority in a
Sum calculated at the rate of 0.1% (zero point of one per cent) of the amount of
Performance Security for delay of each day until such Milestones is achieved;
provided that if any or all project milestone or the scheduled four-Laning Date are
extended in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, the date set forth in
Schedule-G shall be deemed to be modified accordingly and the Provisions of this
Agreement shall apply as if schedule-G has been amended as above; provided further
that in the event Project Completion Date is achieved on or before the scheduled
Four- Laning, date the Damage paid under this Clause- 12.4.2 shall be refunded by
the Authority to the Concessionaire, but without any interest thereon. For the
avoidance of doubt, it is agreed that recovery of Damage under this Clause-12.4.2
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 87
shall be without prejudice to the right of the Authority under this Agreement
including the right of Termination thereof.”
Independent Engineer has critically assessed the allowable Extension of Time (EOT)
for achieving Milestone-1. Accordingly, it was observed that the allowable Extension
of Time (EOT) due to various issues such as delayed handing over of land, delay in
approval of GAD for ROB’s, delay in shifting of various utilities etc. is assessed to be
152 days (That is upto 20-05-2013). However, Concessionaire requested for
Extension of Time, for 135 days from stipulated Milestone -1 date (That is upto 03-
05-2013). Accordingly, Independent Engineer has recommended the Extension of
Time upto 03-05-2013, based on following conditions to be agreed by
Concessionaire.
(a) Concessionaire will not be eligible for any extension of Concession Period on
account of extension of Milestone No-1.
(b) Concessionaire will complete the Milestone No-1 by 03-05-2013 (135 days from
scheduled Milestone No-1 date).
(c) No damages for delay in handing over of land/approval of estimate for utility
shifting/Force Majeure during the period upto extended period of Milestone No-1
(that is upto 03-05-2013) will be claimed as the Extension of Time (EOT)
granted is mutually agreeable to the Concessionaire.
(d) The additional machineries and manpower as promised will be mobilized
immediately.
(e) Further scheduled completion milestone dates including final completion will not
get extended due to extension of Milestone No-1 as provided in schedule ‘G’ of
the Concession Agreement.
While recommending Extension of Time for Milestone no-1, Independent Engineer
has critically assessed and concluded that Concessionaire is eligible for 152 days
extension (That is upto 20-05-2013). However, Concessionaire has requested for
Extension of Time for 135 days only which fall on 03-05-2013. The Milestone no-1
was achieved on 01-05-2013 that is 133rd day from Schedule milestone no-1 date,
which was within the recommended period of Extension of Time. Executive
committee of NHAI has approved EOT upto 01-05’2013
Project Milestone - II
The Concessionaire has to achieve Project Milestone-II by 19-12-2013 as per
Schedule-G of the Concession Agreement. Concessionaire vide their letter no.
SPITPL/P-NHAI/2013-14/2471 dt 28-01-’14 has claimed and informed NHAI that they
have achieved Milestone-II by 19-12-’13 considering the land made available for
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 88
construction. Independent Engineer has reviewed and commented vide letter
no. PIP/IE/NHAI/2014/2164 dt. 03-04-2014. NHAI has advised Concessionaire to
submit undertaking specifying unconditional waiver. In the modified revised
construction programme for Project completion submitted by Concessionaire, they
have indicated that they will achieve Milestone-II by August 2015. The executive
committee of NHAI has approved Extension of Time to achieve Milestone - II upto
31-10-2015.
Four Laning (Project Completion)
Concessionaire did not achieve the Four Laning (Project Completion) as stipulated in
Concession Agreement. Concessionaire has cited various issues such as delay in
handing over of encumbrance - free land, utility shifting, non - removal of
encroachments etc. Concessionaire has requested Extension of Time (EOT) for 898
days (That means upto 30 Nov 2016). It is to be re- iterated that Concessionaire
should also continue to initiate pro-active role in land acquisition and removal of
encumbrances. Further, in the review meeting by Member (PPP) at NHAI Hq on 31-
10-‘14, it was advised to re-visit the EOT issue and submit revised recommendations
(b) It has also been observed that at following underpass locations works can
start/continue:
Sl No Chainage Description Concessionaire’s Comments Our Comments
1 25+860
Khopoli VUP
Panvel
approach
CIDCO pipeline is the major
hurdle: CIDCO pipeline on LHS is
not yet removed by the
authority. There is still land
acquisition problem which is not
sorted out in totally.
CIDCO pipeline will not
affect approach
construction. There is
absolutely no problem to
construct the
approaches.
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 93
(c) The works for Rest area, busbays, truck laybyes etc. are not yet started.
(d) Independent Engineer’s review on the progress of work on highway alongwith land
availability shows that at following locations, highway works should have been in
progress.
Sl No
Chainage Side
Length (Km)
Remarks From To
1 0+400 1+000 B/S 600 BC can be done after rectification of distressed DBM 2 1+500 4+300 B/S 2,800 BC can be done after rectification of distressed DBM 3 5+500 6+800 B/S 1,300 BC can be done after rectification of distressed DBM 4 21+300 23+500 RHS 2,200 BC can be done after rectification of distressed DBM 5 22+950 23+350 LHS 400 Slow Progress 6 31+000 31+600 B/S 600 Work yet to be started 7 40+100 41+900 B/S 1,800 BC can be done after rectification of distressed DBM 8 51+500 51+900 LHS 400 WMM work still not completed 9 59+400 60+300 LHS 900 No work 10 59+700 59+900 RHS 200 Earthwork is not completed 11 60+800 61+700 LHS 900 No work 12 62+400 63+100 LHS 700 No work
2 30+930
Wadkhal VUP
Indapur
approach
Land problem and the
continuous stretch of land is not
available for construction
activity.
There is no problem in
constructing the
approaches.
3 49+280
Koleti PUP
approaches
both ends
Award passed, no payment
made to land owners. Land
problem to be delft by NHAI.
Service road can be
constructed on LHS and
accordingly approaches
can be constructed.
4 50+845
Palas PUP
approaches
on both ends
Verification of land required from
Dy. SLR for confirmation of
encroachment of private land.
The Vaishali Hotel owner
allowing any construction
activity.
There is no problem in
constructing service
road on LHS and thus
constructing the
approaches.
5 54+450 Nagothane
VUP
Govt. land/court matter & the
embankment toe is going
Railway land (ROW) on LHS.
Matter needs to be sorted for
starting the construction activity.
There is no problem for
constructing RHS service
road and the
approaches.
6 68+320 Khmab PUP
Still there are 9 structures on
site which not in vacant position,
continuous stretch of land is not
RE wall.
Concessionaire should
proactively support for
encroachment removal if
any.
7 79+140 Ratwad PUP
No payment made to land
owners. Land owners are not
allowing for work, land problem
to be solved by NHAI.
There is no problem in
constructing the
approaches.
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 94
Sl No
Chainage Side
Length (Km)
Remarks From To
13 63+900 65+900 LHS 2,000 Work is slow progress 14 70+000 72+300 LHS 2,300 No work 15 74+800 76+200 RHS 1,400 Work is slow progress 16 76+550 76+850 LHS 300 No work 17 77+000 77+700 RHS 700 No work 18 81+500 82+600 LHS 1,100 No work 19 81+200 82+400 RHS 1,200 GSB work is not completed 20 81+500 82+600 LHS 1,100 No work
Total 22,900
The above details show that in spite of sufficient work fronts available the Concessionaire
could not achieve better progress due to lack of various resources.
Non-Maintenance of The Project Highway : It has been observed that at some
locations (most of them are in new carriageway) many Potholes/Patchwork are not yet
repaired in spite of continuous follow up with Concessionaire. Non-maintenance of the
highway is leading to lot of criticism by the road users, administration and print media. Non-
maintenance of the highway will have to be considered as default of obligations by the
Concessionaire as per the terms of the Concession Agreement.
Many Pending Designs and Drawings: Many design and drawings for highway and
structures are still pending with Concessionaire. An updated list was issued to
Concessionaire vide letter no. PIP/IE/SPITPL/2014/2806 dt. 04-12-’14. In spite of several
reminders no action is taken by Concessionaire for last nine months.
Non-Closure Of NCR’s, Site Inspection Reports, Audit Reports: Concessionaire
has not closed out many NCR’s Site Inspection Reports / Audit Reports in spite of several
reminders. Concessionaire has been advised many times that whatever works carried out
above the work where NCR/site inspection note issued will also be considered Non-
acceptable. In spite of such reminders Concessionaire has not yet improve the quality of
works. Non-closure of such NCR’s/Site Inspection Report/Audit Reports/ letters on
quality issues etc. is of major quality concern and will lead to contractual complications.
Insufficient Resources: Concessionaire has not mobilised sufficient resources such as
fund, manpower, machinery, plant etc. Resources mobilised are very less. Construction
works were held up many times for want of fund, cement, bitumen, diesel, manpower,
machinery, and other resources etc.
Crusher Production in Section - II : It has been observed that crusher production in
Section - II is very less and will not cater for requirement and this has been reported to
Concessionaire vide letter no. PIP/IE/SPITPL/2014/2773 dt. 21-11-‘14
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 95
Status of ROB Approvals: The following is the status of approval of ROB’s:
Sl No
Chainage (Km)
Location Status
1 16+062 Kharpada
(1) GAD (General Arrangement Drawing) - Approved by Railways.
64 28-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/3009 Concessionaire Representation From M/s Vibhor Steel Tubes (P) Ltd. at Ch. 63+700 -Comments.
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February ‘15 Page 111
Sl
No Date Letter No. To Subject
65 28-02-'15 PIP/IE/NHAI/2015/3010 NHAI Updating of Project Monitoring System Data and uploading Data For Project Specific
Website.
Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February ‘15 Page 112
Appendix-I
1. Stretch Panvel to Indapur Accident Data & Observations
2. Stretch Chainage 0+000 to 84+600.
3. State Maharashtra.
4. District Raigarh
5. Police Station Palaspe, Nagothane, New Panvel, SP Traffic Control Office
Alibag.
6. National Highway No. NH - 17
Month : February 2015
Sl
No
Date Time of Accident
(am/pm)
A B C D E F G H
Vehicle
Responsible
No. of Affected Persons No. of
Animals
Killed, if
any
Help
provided by
Ambulance/
Patrol Vehicle
Remarks Accident Location
Nature of Accident
Classificati
on
of Accident
Causes Road
Features
Road
Conditi
on
Intersec
tion Type &
Control
Weather Condition
Fatal Grievous Minor Non-
Injured
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
'A' : Urban / Rural and Details of surrounding land use
'B' : 1 - Overturning, 2-Head on collision, 3 - Rear End Collision, 4 - Collision Brush / Side Wipe, 5 - Right Turn Collision, 6-Skidding, 7 - Right Turn Collision, 8 - Others (Pls Specific)
'C' : 1- Fata, 2 - Grievous Injury, 3 - Minor Injured, 4 - Non Injury
'D' :1 - Drunken, 2 - Overspending, 3 - Vehicle out of control, 4 - Fault of driver of motor vehicle / driver of other vehicle / cyclist / pedestrarian /, 5 - Defect in mechanical condition of motor vehicle /
road condition
'E' : 1 - Single lane, 2 - Two lanes, 3 - three lanes or more without central divider (median), 4 - Four lanes or emore with Central divider