National Food Security Mission

National Food Security Mission

An enduring journey for attaining and sustaining food and nutritional security

Kisan ki UnnatiDesh ki Pragati

Presentation to Parliamentary Consultative Committee of Ministry of AgricultureIn-session meeting on 5th June, 2013

Gap in Yield with Farmers Practice and Improved Technology at Sample Farms %

State Wheat State RiceUttar Pradesh 26.5 Upland rainfedBihar 25.7 Chhattisgarh 19.2Punjab 10.6 Jharkhand 66.1Haryana 5.1 Uttar Pradesh 46.0Rajasthan 6.0 IrrigatedGujarat 15.6 Chhattisgarh 24.9

Madhya Pradesh 33.4 Bihar 17.4

Maharashtra 17.3 Gujarat 14.2

Himachal Pradesh 23.0 J&K 59.1

West Bengal 32.9 UP 35.6

Uttarakhand 38.6 Uttarakhand 20.3

Mission - salient features

• Promotes proven technologies– Bridge the yield gaps

• Result oriented– Additional production to meet growing demand

• Targets low productivity high potential districts– Widen the food basket

Technology

Seeds Soil Health

National Food Security Mission

(NFSM)

Farm Machines

Plant Protection

PMTs and Direct Fund

Publicity, FFS and Demo

Extension and Admin

MissionIngredients

NFSM in 11th PlanExpenditure in Rs. Crores

Year Rice Wheat Pulses+A3P

Publicity Total release

2007-08 58.97 208.19 105.59 25.98 398.732008-09 340.53 232.23 287.29 23.24 883.292009-10 294.33 317.98 387.67 19.18 1019.162010-11 258.94 261.36 727.76 32 1280.062011-12 328.36 265.52 658.45 33.62 1285.95Total 1281.13 1285.28 2166.76 134.02 4867.19Total plan outlay 4883 crores

Components promoted

1246.76; 27%

1225.27; 26%714.26; 15%

555.79; 12%

314.75; 7%

254.2; 5%

187.62; 4%112.45; 2% 73.48; 2%

Machinery Seeds Extension INM Research IPM Local Initiatives Publicity Administration

THREE SALIENT GAINS

Target achievedWider Food basketEastern India

Food Production in 11th PlanCrop Targ

et10th plan 11th plan increase over

base Addl. Prodn

2006-07

Average

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

Average

Terminal year

Average

Rice 10 93 86 97 99 89 96 105 97 12 11Wheat

8 76 70 79 81 81 87 95 85 19 15

Pulses

2 14 13 15 15 15 18 17 16 3 3

Total Food Grains

20 217 202 231 235 218 245 259 238 42 36

Contribution of NFSM Districts

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

29.3738.59

36.63

39.37

10.72

3.97

40.9244350.196979

43.850786

48.598299

12.262571

5.461965

NFSM Districts Non NFSM Districts NFSM Districts Non NFSM Districts0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

11.552741

7.22461499999999

1.546368

11.606905

9.225109

1.494367

NFSM Districts Non NFSM DistrictsCrops 2006-07 2011-12 % increase 2006-07 2011-12 % increaseRice 1547 2171 40.30 1987 2296 15.50Wheat 2556 2682 5.00 3159 3651 15.50Pulses 619 693 12.00 632 742 17.00

Crop 11th Plan 12th Plan Replaced %Rice 136 131 40 29Wheat 141 96 70 50Pulses 158 148 90 57Coarse Cereals 99Total 435 474 110 25

Yield gain (kg/ha) Focus Districts

Supply response to demand for FoodGrains

2002 2007 2012 2017190

200

210

220

230

240

250

260

270

204

225

244

260

212 220224

216

259

DemandProj ProdProduction

Widened Food BasketProduction in ‘000 tons Cereals Pulses Surplus-Deficit (%)

Per capita - g/day Average Per capita Average Per capita PC cereals PC PulsesPunjab 28120 2781 20 2 595 -94

Haryana 17187 1857 124 13 364 -62Himachal Pradesh 2195 877 29 12 119 -67Madhya Pradesh 20434 771 4084 154 93 340

Rajasthan 18639 744 2766 110 86 216Uttar Pradesh 50974 700 2480 34 75 -3Chhattisgarh 6495 697 437 47 74 34

Karnataka 15327 687 1246 56 72 60Andhra Pradesh 20678 669 1209 39 67 12

West Bengal 16700 501 198 6 25 -83Uttarakhand 1835 497 48 13 24 -63

Bihar 18516 489 956 25 22 -28Jammu & Kashmir 1977 432 17 4 8 -89

Orissa 6293 411 370 24 3 -31Gujarat 8770 398 759 34 -1 -2

Tamil Nadu 10315 392 358 14 -2 -61Assam 4433 390 97 9 -3 -76

Jharkhand 4537 377 478 40 -6 14Maharashtra 12229 298 2177 53 -25 52

Kerala 549 45 3 0 -89 -99

Diet NormsCereals: 400g/day Pulses: 35g/day

Average is of 5 years’ production in 11th Plan period

National Nutrition Monitoring Bureau,

2006

DES, Ministry of Agriculture, GoI

National Food Security Mission – anchored food production efforts

Nutri Farms

Millets Development

Pulses program - RKVY

Eastern India Development

NFSM

From 2010-11 Outlay for food crops increased from 4882 crores to 9500 crores with support of RKVY

Eastern India Rice yields in 2009

Eastern India Rice Yields in 2011-12

Punjab

Tamiln

adu

Andhra Prad

esh

Haryan

a

Karnata

ka

West Ben

gal

Kerala

All-India

Uttar Prad

esh

Gujarat

Bihar

Uttarakh

and

Jammu &

Kashmir

Jharkhan

d

Rajasth

anAssa

m

Mahara

shtra

Himach

al Prad

esh

Chhattisga

rhOris

sa

Madhya

Pradesh

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

40003741

3423

31463044

28972719 2668

2372 23582162 2158 2124 2078 2018

1886 1849 18211704

15971448

1106

12TH PLAN APPROACH

Coarse cereals includedSpecial plan for remote areasCropping system

• Strategy of targeting low productivity districts– Assured funding– PMTs at District, State and National level

• Result oriented Approach– Production targets – Krishi Karman Awards at State and National Levels– Mid course corrections

• Promotional Programs – Seeds, nutrients, plant protection measures and farm

machines

What worked

• 1/4th districts (105) unresponsive– Problems of remote locations– Agro ecologies

• Weak Documentation– Low Capacity of extension machinery

• Seed production– New varieties– Hybrid Rice, pulses

What didn’t work

Priorities of NFSM in 12th Plan

Strengthen Delivery Channels Improve work environment▪ Skills and tool sets

Improve Accountability▪ Concurrent evaluation

Develop Alternate Delivery Channels Emphasis on new Institutions▪ Within (FPOs), Outside (NRLM)

Involve NGOs▪ Remote inaccessible areas

• Accelerated Crop Production Program as the key driver of change in the lowest producing areas– Holistic treatment for the cropping system instead of a crop

• Technology promotion to sustain 11th Plan gains• Technology development for food crops in commercial crop based

cropping system• Strategic and Adaptive research

– NARS and CGIAR institutions• New programs

– stabilized production of foodgrains• Special projects in high productivity areas

– value chain integration and marketing support– improving access to technology for small holders

• Special project for remote areas• Promoting agri Services in farm operations

Approach

Proposed Plan OutlayI. Food Crops Rs. 12,200 CroresII. Cotton Rs. 71 CroresIII. Jute Rs. 41 CroresIV. Sugarcane Rs. 38 Crores

Total Rs. 12,350 Crores

Production Targets V. Rice 10 Million tonsVI. Wheat 8 Million tonsVII. Pulses 4 Million tonsVIII. Coarse cereals 3 Million tons

Total 25 Million tons

National Food Security Mission-EFC for XII Plan (2012-13 to 2016-17)

Summary of proposed outlay

ACPP InputsValue Chain

Local Initiatives, PMTs etc. Total

Rice 1380 863.67 546.70 2790.37Wheat 1100 688.43 435.78 2224.20Pulses 2000 1251.69 100 792.32 4144.01

Coarse Cereals 1455 910.61 100 576.42 3042.02 Food Crops 5935 3714.40 200 2351.22 12200

Commercial Crops 150 150 5935 3714.40 200 2501.22 12350

34%

25%

23%

18%

1%PulsesCoarse Ce-realsRiceWheat Commercial Crops

Why continued focus on Foodgrains?

• Sustained and ever increasing demand• Strategic– 2/3rd of Crop area is under food grains• Crop Diversification and Eastern India

– Climate Change and Millets/Pulses crops• Sustainable agriculture

– Feed/Fodder• Maize, millets

– Global Food Situation – Trade oppurtunities

PulsesDemand-Supply

2004-2005

2005-2006

2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

2011-2012

2014-2015

2019-2020

0

5

10

15

20

25

14.2 14.63

16.2416.77

17.5118.29

19.0819.91

21.31

23.26

13.13 13.3914.2

14.76 14.57 14.96

18.2417.21

1.3391.695

2.4762.835

2.474

3.51

2.699 3.308

Demand Production Import

Pulses – New initiatives

• Linking pulses farmers to market– Setting up farmer producer organizations through

Small Farmers agri business consortium (SFAC)– Building pulses value chain in PPP (Rallis)

• Remunerative Minimum Support Price– Procurement operations by FPOs backed by SFAC-

NCDEX-NAFED• ‘Nitrogen award’ being worked out as bonus to

monetize environmental benefits of pulses

Kisan ki UnnatiDesh ki Pragati

Finally• While cereals production is more assured, a

lot of work needs to be done on pulses and millets

• Liberal budgetary support, strong political will and innovative programs augur well for the success in Pulses as well

• NFSM created opportunities for innovations to effectively meet the needs of the farmers Thank you