National Fire Protection Association Report · 2016-04-05 · Second Revision No. 1-NFPA 130-2015 [ Chapter 2 ] Chapter 2 Referenced Publications 2.1 General. The documents or portions

National Fire Protection Association

1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471

Phone: 617-770-3000 • Fax: 617-770-0700 • www.nfpa.org

M E M O R A N D U M

TO: Technical Committee on Fixed Guideway Transit and Passenger Rail Systems

FROM: Sarah Caldwell, Project Administrator

DATE: January 15, 2016

SUBJECT: NFPA 130 Second Draft Technical Committee FINAL Ballot Results

(A2016)

According to the final ballot results, all ballot items received the necessary affirmative votes to pass

ballot.

30 Members Eligible to Vote

6 Members Not Returned (Grizard, Harrison, Kennedy, IV, Thomas, Weng, White)

18 Members Voted Affirmative on All Revisions (w/ comment: Alston, Laurin, Mao)

6 Members Voted Negative on one or more Revisions (Alston, Fagerlund, Laurin, Locke,

Nott, Till)

0 Members Abstained on one or more Revisions

The attached report shows the number of affirmative, negative, and abstaining votes as well as the

explanation of the vote for each revision.

To pass ballot, each revision requires: (1) a simple majority of those eligible to vote and (2) an

affirmative vote of 2/3 of ballots returned. See Sections 3.3.4.3.(c) and 4.4.10.1 of the Regulations

Governing the Development of NFPA Standards.

Second Revision No. 1-NFPA 130-2015 [ Chapter 2 ]

Chapter 2 Referenced Publications

2.1 General.

The documents or portions thereof listed in this chapter are referenced within this standard and shall beconsidered part of the requirements of this document.

2.2 NFPA Publications.

National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471.

NFPA 10, Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers, 2013 edition.

NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, 2016 edition.

NFPA 14, Standard for the Installation of Standpipe and Hose Systems, 2016 edition.

NFPA 22, Standard for Water Tanks for Private Fire Protection, 2013 edition.

NFPA 25, Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems,2017 edition.

NFPA 70®, National Electrical Code®, 2017 edition.

NFPA 72®, National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code, 2016 edition.

NFPA 91, Standard for Exhaust Systems for Air Conveying of Vapors, Gases, Mists, and ParticulateSolids, 2015 edition.

NFPA NFPA 101®, Life Safety Code®, 2015 edition.

NFPA 110, Standard for Emergency and Standby Power Systems, 2016 edition.

NFPA 220, Standard on Types of Building Construction, 2015 edition.

NFPA 241, Standard for Safeguarding Construction, Alteration, and Demolition Operations, 2013 edition.

NFPA 253, Standard Method of Test for Critical Radiant Flux of Floor Covering Systems Using a RadiantHeat Energy Source, 2015 edition.

NFPA 262, Standard Method of Test for Flame Travel and Smoke of Wires and Cables for Use inAir-Handling Spaces, 2015 edition.

NFPA 275, Standard Method of Fire Tests for the Evaluation of Thermal Barriers, 2013 edition.

NFPA 286, Standard Methods of Fire Tests for Evaluating Contribution of Wall and Ceiling Interior Finishto Room Fire Growth, 2015 edition.

NFPA 703, Standard for Fire Retardant–Treated Wood and Fire-Retardant Coatings for Building Materials,2015 edition.

2.3 Other Publications.

2.3.1 AMCA Publications.

Air Movement and Control Association International, Inc., 30 West University Drive, Arlington Heights, IL,60004-1893.

ANSI/AMCA 210, Laboratory Methods of Testing Fans for Aerodynamic Performance Rating, 2007.

ANSI/ AMCA 250, Laboratory Methods of Testing Jet Tunnel Fans for Performance, 2012.

ANSI/ AMCA 300, Reverberant Room Method for Sound Testing of Fans, 2008 2014 .

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

1 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

2.3.2 APTA Publications.

American Public Transportation Association, 1666 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.

APTA SS PR -PS-S- 002, Rev 3, Standard for Emergency Signage for Egress/Access of Passenger RailEquipment, 1998, revised 2007.

2.3.3 ASHRAE Publications.

ASHRAE Inc. , 1791 Tullie Circle, NE, Atlanta, GA 30329-2305.

ASHRAE Handbook — Fundamentals, 2013.

ASHRAE 149, Laboratory Methods of Testing Fans Used to Exhaust Smoke in Smoke ManagementSystems, 2013.

2.3.4 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM C1166, Standard Test Method for Flame Propagation of Dense and Cellular Elastometric Gasketsand Accessories, 2006 (2011).

ASTM D2724, Standard Test Methods for Bonded, Fused, and Laminated Apparel Fabrics, 2006 2007(2011 2015 )e1 .

ASTM D3574, Standard Test Methods for Flexible Cellular Materials — Slab, Bonded, and MoldedUrethane Foams, 2011.

ASTM D3675, Standard Test Method for Surface Flammability of Flexible Cellular Materials Using aRadiant Heat Energy Source, 2014.

ASTM D7568, Standard Specification for Polyethylene-Based Structural-Grade Plastic Lumber forOutdoor Applications, 2013.

ASTM E84, Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, 2014 2015a .

ASTM E119, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials, 2014 2015 .

ASTM E136, Standard Test Method for Behavior of Materials in a Vertical Tube Furnace at 750°C, 2012.

ASTM E162, Standard Test Method for Surface Flammability of Materials Using a Radiant Heat EnergySource, 2013 2015a .

ASTM E648, Standard Test Method for Critical Radiant Flux of Floor-Covering Systems Using a RadiantHeat Energy Source, 2014c 2015 .

ASTM E662, Standard Test Method for Specific Optical Density of Smoke Generated by Solid Materials,2014 2015 .

ASTM E814, Standard Test Method for Fire Tests of Through-Penetration Fire Stops, 2013a.

ASTM E1354, Standard Test Method for Heat and Visible Smoke Release Rates for Materials andProducts Using an Oxygen Consumption Calorimeter, 2014 2015a .

ASTM E1537, Standard Test Method for Fire Testing of Upholstered Furniture, 2013.

ASTM E1590, Standard Test Method for Fire Testing of Mattresses, 2013.

ASTM E2061, Standard Guide for Fire Hazard Assessment of Rail Transportation Vehicles, 2012.

ASTM E2652, Standard Test Method for Behavior of Materials in a Tube Furnace with a Cone-ShapedAirflow Stabilizer, at 750°C, 2012.

2.3.5 California Technical Bulletins.

State of California, Department of Consumer Affairs, Bureau of Home Furnishings and Thermal Insulation,3485 Orange Grove Avenue, North Highlands, CA 95660-5595.

Technical Bulletin 129, Flammability Test Procedure for Mattresses for Use in Public Buildings, October1992.

Technical Bulletin 133, Flammability Test Procedure for Seating Furniture for Use in Public Occupancies,January 1991.


2 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

2.3.6 ICEA Publications.

Insulated Cable Engineers Association, P.O. Box 1568, Carrollton, GA 30112.

ICEA S-73-532 ANSI /NEMA WC-57, Standard for Control, Thermocouple Extension, and InstrumentationCables, 2004 2014 .

ICEA S-95-658 ANSI /NEMA WC-70, Nonshielded Power Cables Rated 2000 Volts or Less for theDistribution of Electrical Energy, 2009.

2.3.7 IEC Publications.

International Electrotechnical Commission, 3, rue de Varembé, P.O. Box 131, CH-1211 Geneva 20,Switzerland.

IEC 60331-11, Tests for electric cables under fire conditions — Circuit integrity — Part 11: Apparatus —Fire alone at a flame temperature of at least 750°C, 2009.

IEC 62520, Railway applications electric traction, short primary type linear induction motors (LIM) fed bypower converters, 2011.

2.3.8 IEEE Publications.

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Three IEEE, 3 Park Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY10016-5997.

IEEE 11, Standard for Rotating Electric Machinery for Rail and Road Vehicles, 2000 (R2006).

IEEE 16, American Standard for Electric Control Apparatus for Land Transportation Vehicles, 2004.

IEEE 1202, Standard for Flame-Propagation Testing of Wire and Cable Cables for use in Cable Tray ,2012.

2.3.9 UL Publications.

Underwriters Laboratories Inc., 333 Pfingsten Road, Northbrook, IL 60062-2096.

ANSI/UL 44, Standard for Safety Thermoset-Insulated Wires and Cables, 2014.

ANSI/UL 83, Standard for Safety Thermoplastic-Insulated Wires and Cables, 2014.

ANSI/UL 263, Standard for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials,2011 2014 .

ANSI/UL 1685, Standard for Vertical-Tray Fire-Propagation and Smoke-Release Test for Electrical andOptical-Fiber Cables, 2007, revised 2010 2015 .

UL 1724, Outline of Investigation for Fire Tests for Electrical Circuit Protective Systems, 2006.

ANSI/UL 2196, Standard for Safety for Tests for Fire Resistive Cables, 2001, revised 2012.

2.3.10 U.S. Government Publications.

U.S. Government Printing Publishing Office, 732 North Capitol Street, NW, Washington, DC20402 20401-0001 .

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 25, Appendix F, Part I, “Vertical Test.”

2.3.11 Other Publications.

Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 11th edition, Merriam-Webster, Inc., Springfield, MA, 2003.


3 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

2.4 References for Extracts in Mandatory Sections.

NFPA 72®, National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code, 2016 edition.

NFPA 92, Standard for Smoke Control Systems, 2015 edition.

NFPA 101®, Life Safety Code®, 2012 2015 edition.

NFPA 253, Standard Method of Test for Critical Radiant Flux of Floor Covering Systems Using a RadiantHeat Energy Source, 2015 edition.

NFPA 270, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Smoke Obscuration Using a Conical RadiantSource in a Single Closed Chamber, 2013 edition.

NFPA 402, Guide for Aircraft Rescue and Fire-Fighting Operations, 2013 edition.

NFPA 472, Standard for Competence of Responders to Hazardous Materials/Weapons of MassDestruction Incidents, 2013 edition.

NFPA 502, Standard for Road Tunnels, Bridges, and Other Limited Access Highways, 2017 edition.

NFPA 921, Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations, 2014 edition.

NFPA 1994, Standard on Protective Ensembles for First Responders to CBRN Terrorism Incidents, 2012edition.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Chad Duffy

Organization: [ Not Specified ]

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Sep 27 18:55:41 EDT 2015

Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Updated per NFPA MOS.

Response Message:

Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 130-2015 [Chapter 2]

Public Comment No. 4-NFPA 130-2015 [Section No. 2.3.4]

Ballot Results

This item has passed ballot

30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

24 Affirmative All

0 Affirmative with Comments

0 Negative with Comments

0 Abstention

Not Returned

Grizard, William P.

Harrison, Kevin P.


4 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Kennedy, IV, Bernard J.

Thomas, Michael J.

Weng, Leong Kwok

White, Steven C.

Affirmative All

Alston, Jarrod

Casselman, David M.

Devlin, John F.

Fagerlund, Katherine

Giblin III, Charles J.

Kenny, Thomas P.

Koffel, William E.

Laurin, Pierre

Levitt, Harold L.

Lewis, Kevin M.

Li, Silas K.

Locke, Harold A.

Mao, David

Martineau, Luc

McKinney, Daniel M.

Nelsen, John

Nott, Neil E.

Peacock, Richard D.

Roman, Steven W.

Sandu, Julian

Teo, Joshua

Till, Robert C.

White, John Powell

Wilchek, Stephen B.


5 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Second Revision No. 19-NFPA 130-2015 [ Section No. 3.3.19 ]

3.3.19 Fire Emergency.

The existence of, or threat of, fire or the development of smoke or fumes, or any combination thereof, thatdemands immediate action to correct or alleviate mitigate the condition or situation. [502, 2017]



Organization: National Fire Protection Assoc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Nov 17 11:51:13 EST 2015

Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Definition revised to align with NFPA 502, 2017.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

24 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Grizard, William P.

Harrison, Kevin P.


Thomas, Michael J.

Weng, Leong Kwok

White, Steven C.

Affirmative All

Alston, Jarrod

Casselman, David M.

Devlin, John F.


6 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM



Kenny, Thomas P.

Koffel, William E.

Laurin, Pierre

Levitt, Harold L.

Lewis, Kevin M.

Li, Silas K.

Locke, Harold A.

Mao, David

Martineau, Luc

McKinney, Daniel M.

Nelsen, John

Nott, Neil E.

Peacock, Richard D.

Roman, Steven W.

Sandu, Julian

Teo, Joshua

Till, Robert C.

White, John Powell

Wilchek, Stephen B.


7 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM


3.3.59 Time Weighted Average (TWA).

A continuous sound level that, over a defined period, would produce the same noise dose as the varyingsound level.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Sep 29 13:03:10 EDT 2015

Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The definition has been deleted because it is not used in the body of the standard.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

23 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Grizard, William P.

Harrison, Kevin P.


Thomas, Michael J.

Weng, Leong Kwok

White, Steven C.

Affirmative All

Alston, Jarrod

Casselman, David M.

Devlin, John F.


8 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM



Kenny, Thomas P.

Koffel, William E.

Laurin, Pierre

Levitt, Harold L.

Lewis, Kevin M.

Li, Silas K.

Locke, Harold A.

Martineau, Luc

McKinney, Daniel M.

Nelsen, John

Nott, Neil E.

Peacock, Richard D.

Roman, Steven W.

Sandu, Julian

Teo, Joshua

Till, Robert C.

White, John Powell

Wilchek, Stephen B.

Affirmative with Comment

Mao, David

Current 2014 edition of NFPA 130 does not have section 3.3.59. Deleting unused definition is supported.


9 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Second Revision No. 8-NFPA 130-2015 [ New Section after 5.2.5.3 ]

5.2.6 Exposed Insulation.

5.2.6.1

In public circulation areas, exposed insulation shall be protected by a thermal barrier complying withNFPA 275 or by 1 ⁄2 in. (12.7 mm) gypsum board or 1 ⁄2 in. (12.7 mm) concrete.

5.2.6.2

Where thermal barriers are required by 5.2.6.1 , penetrations shall be firestopped in accordance withASTM E814.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The building code referenced by sections 5.1.2.1 allows for the installation of exposed insulation.Exposed combustible insulation in stations should be protected by a barrier to inhibit potential firegrowth and spread providing a protected egress for occupants. Renumber existing 5.2.6 as 5.2.7.

ResponseMessage:

Public Comment No. 7-NFPA 130-2015 [New Section after 5.2.6]

Public Comment No. 8-NFPA 130-2015 [Section No. 5.1.1.1]

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Grizard, William P.

Harrison, Kevin P.



10 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Thomas, Michael J.

Weng, Leong Kwok

White, Steven C.

Affirmative All

Casselman, David M.

Devlin, John F.


Kenny, Thomas P.

Koffel, William E.

Levitt, Harold L.

Lewis, Kevin M.

Li, Silas K.

Mao, David

Martineau, Luc

McKinney, Daniel M.

Nelsen, John

Peacock, Richard D.

Roman, Steven W.

Sandu, Julian

Teo, Joshua

White, John Powell

Wilchek, Stephen B.


Laurin, Pierre

Suggest to remove reference to 1/2 in. concrete, re. Jarrod Alston comment in original ballot.

Negative with Comment

Alston, Jarrod

The proposed language extends recognized or accepted thermal barriers beyond what is recognized by othercodes/standards such as NFPA 5000 or IBC. Only 1/2 in. gypsum is permitted without testing to NFPA 275 underthose codes and it would be viewed as inappropriate to extend to 1/2 in. concrete without justification.


I agree with Mr. Nott’s and Mr. Alston’s comments. Further, the proposed language does not differentiate betweenrequirements for combustible versus non-combustible insulation as is typical in the applicable building codes.

Locke, Harold A.

I agree with the comments made by Notts and Alstom

Nott, Neil E.

It is not clear that exposed insulation in public circulation areas presents unique hazards in fixed guideway transitand passenger rail systems that are not addressed in the building code referenced by sections 5.1.2.1. Noexamples are provided of incidents that may have occurred, or research suggesting that this is a significant “gap”that should be addressed in NFPA 130.

Till, Robert C.


11 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Extending the thermal barrier interpretation for ½ in concrete without testing should be deleted.


12 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Second Revision No. 15-NFPA 130-2015 [ Section No. 5.3.5.4 ]

5.3.5.4

Escalators shall not account for more than one-half of the means of egress capacity at any one levelexcept as permitted by 5.3.5.5.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Annex A.5.3.5.4 has been deleted as the cross reference was an editorial error.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

24 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Grizard, William P.

Harrison, Kevin P.


Thomas, Michael J.

Weng, Leong Kwok

White, Steven C.

Affirmative All

Alston, Jarrod

Casselman, David M.

Devlin, John F.


13 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM



Kenny, Thomas P.

Koffel, William E.

Laurin, Pierre

Levitt, Harold L.

Lewis, Kevin M.

Li, Silas K.

Locke, Harold A.

Mao, David

Martineau, Luc

McKinney, Daniel M.

Nelsen, John

Nott, Neil E.

Peacock, Richard D.

Roman, Steven W.

Sandu, Julian

Teo, Joshua

Till, Robert C.

White, John Powell

Wilchek, Stephen B.


14 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM


7.1.1*

This chapter defines the requirements for the environmental conditions and the mechanical andnonmechanical ventilation systems used to meet those requirements for a fire emergency in a systemstation, trainway, or both as required by 5.4.7 and 6.4.7.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Editorial, revised cross reference.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

24 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Grizard, William P.

Harrison, Kevin P.


Thomas, Michael J.

Weng, Leong Kwok

White, Steven C.

Affirmative All

Alston, Jarrod

Casselman, David M.


15 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Devlin, John F.



Kenny, Thomas P.

Koffel, William E.

Laurin, Pierre

Levitt, Harold L.

Lewis, Kevin M.

Li, Silas K.

Locke, Harold A.

Mao, David

Martineau, Luc

McKinney, Daniel M.

Nelsen, John

Nott, Neil E.

Peacock, Richard D.

Roman, Steven W.

Sandu, Julian

Teo, Joshua

Till, Robert C.

White, John Powell

Wilchek, Stephen B.


16 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM


7.1.2.2*

A mechanical emergency ventilation system shall be provided in the following locations:

(1) In an enclosed system station

(2) In a system an underground or enclosed trainway that is greater in length than 1000 ft (305 m)




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Sep 28 12:10:07 EDT 2015

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This revision to the text are required to align with the terms defined in the standard. As currentlywritten, the requirement for mechanical emergency ventilation system applies to "an enclosed systemstation" (as opposed to an "enclosed station" per definition in Chapter 3). A mechanical emergencyventilation system is not required for "an open system station" (as opposed to an "open station" asdefined). The current text, when applied literally by an AHJ, can lead to significant ambiguity. It is notclear from current text in 7.1.2.2.(1) and 7.1.2.3.(1) if the intent of NFPA 130 is to refer to an open orenclosed station on a transit system OR to a station on an open or enclosed transit system.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

24 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Grizard, William P.

Harrison, Kevin P.



17 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Thomas, Michael J.

Weng, Leong Kwok

White, Steven C.

Affirmative All

Alston, Jarrod

Casselman, David M.

Devlin, John F.



Kenny, Thomas P.

Koffel, William E.

Laurin, Pierre

Levitt, Harold L.

Lewis, Kevin M.

Li, Silas K.

Locke, Harold A.

Mao, David

Martineau, Luc

McKinney, Daniel M.

Nelsen, John

Nott, Neil E.

Peacock, Richard D.

Roman, Steven W.

Sandu, Julian

Teo, Joshua

Till, Robert C.

White, John Powell

Wilchek, Stephen B.


18 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM


7.1.4

Where required by 7.1.2, the mechanical or nonmechanical emergency ventilation system shall makeprovisions for the protection of passengers, employees, and emergency personnel from fire and smokeduring a fire emergency.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

In the case that a nonmechanical ventilation system is required, it should be designed to meetthe same criteria as a mechanical system

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

24 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Grizard, William P.

Harrison, Kevin P.


Thomas, Michael J.

Weng, Leong Kwok

White, Steven C.

Affirmative All


19 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Alston, Jarrod

Casselman, David M.

Devlin, John F.



Kenny, Thomas P.

Koffel, William E.

Laurin, Pierre

Levitt, Harold L.

Lewis, Kevin M.

Li, Silas K.

Locke, Harold A.

Mao, David

Martineau, Luc

McKinney, Daniel M.

Nelsen, John

Nott, Neil E.

Peacock, Richard D.

Roman, Steven W.

Sandu, Julian

Teo, Joshua

Till, Robert C.

White, John Powell

Wilchek, Stephen B.


20 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM


7.2.6* Time of Tenability.

The criteria for tenability and time of tenability for stations and trainways shall be established andapproved. For stations, the time shall be greater than the calculated egress time used to establish egresscapacity in 5.3.3 .

7.2.6.1

The criteria for tenability and time of tenability for stations and trainways shall be established andapproved.

7.2.6.2

For stations, the time shall be greater than the calculated egress time used to establish egress capacityin 5.3.3 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Revised section to comply with NFPA MOS.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

23 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Grizard, William P.

Harrison, Kevin P.


Thomas, Michael J.

Weng, Leong Kwok


21 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

White, Steven C.

Affirmative All

Alston, Jarrod

Casselman, David M.

Devlin, John F.



Kenny, Thomas P.

Koffel, William E.

Levitt, Harold L.

Lewis, Kevin M.

Li, Silas K.

Locke, Harold A.

Mao, David

Martineau, Luc

McKinney, Daniel M.

Nelsen, John

Nott, Neil E.

Peacock, Richard D.

Roman, Steven W.

Sandu, Julian

Teo, Joshua

Till, Robert C.

White, John Powell

Wilchek, Stephen B.


Laurin, Pierre

Suggest that new 7.2.6.2 read: "For stations, the time of tenability shall be greater than the calculated egress timeused in 5.3.3". Justification: We need to add "of tenability" after "time", to properly define "time", given that the twosentences in 7.2.6 are now separated. It is also suggested to remove "to establish egress capacity" to simplify theintent of the sentence, which is to compare "time of tenability" with "time of egress".


22 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM


7.3.4.1

Thermal overload protective devices in fan motors or , damper motors, or on motor controls of fans usedfor emergency ventilation shall not be permitted.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Damper motors where added for the same reason thermal overloads defeat the purpose ofemergency ventilation fan motors.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

23 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Grizard, William P.

Harrison, Kevin P.


Thomas, Michael J.

Weng, Leong Kwok

White, Steven C.

Affirmative All


23 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Alston, Jarrod

Casselman, David M.

Devlin, John F.



Kenny, Thomas P.

Koffel, William E.

Laurin, Pierre

Levitt, Harold L.

Lewis, Kevin M.

Li, Silas K.

Locke, Harold A.

Mao, David

Martineau, Luc

McKinney, Daniel M.

Nelsen, John

Nott, Neil E.

Peacock, Richard D.

Roman, Steven W.

Sandu, Julian

Teo, Joshua

White, John Powell

Wilchek, Stephen B.


Till, Robert C.

Where the fan has to be modulated or moved DURING a fire event then the thermal overload should bebypassed as the clause suggests. However, where fire mode calls for a single action, there is no need to protectthe thermal overload. Examples are where a fail-safe spring return is incorporated into the damper design, orwhere the damper is actuated to the fire mode position early in the growth phase of the fire. The latter requiresadequate detection and response but not a thermal overload bypass. The requirement as written requiresadditional onerous requirements and stops innovative design. I would leave the clause as previously written.


24 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM


7.7.2

For electrical substations and , distribution rooms, serving and rooms containing control equipmentserving emergency ventilation systems where the local environmental conditions require the use ofmechanical ventilation or cooling to maintain the space temperature below the electrical equipmentoperating limits, such mechanical ventilation or cooling systems shall be designed so that failure of anysingle air moving or cooling unit does not result in the loss of the electrical supply to the emergencyventilation fans during the specified period of operation.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Control equipment typically are more prone to overheating. The same rationale used forpreventing the electrical distribution equipment from overheating should be applied to the controlequipment which serves the emergency ventilaiton system.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

23 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Grizard, William P.

Harrison, Kevin P.


Thomas, Michael J.

Weng, Leong Kwok


25 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

White, Steven C.

Affirmative All

Alston, Jarrod

Casselman, David M.

Devlin, John F.



Kenny, Thomas P.

Koffel, William E.

Laurin, Pierre

Levitt, Harold L.

Lewis, Kevin M.

Li, Silas K.

Locke, Harold A.

Mao, David

Martineau, Luc

McKinney, Daniel M.

Nelsen, John

Nott, Neil E.

Peacock, Richard D.

Roman, Steven W.

Sandu, Julian

Teo, Joshua

White, John Powell

Wilchek, Stephen B.


Till, Robert C.

The Committee Statement necessitating the change is entirely correct but the revised wording is not quite correct.The last sentence only talks about electrical supply and should mention control as well. Additionally, given thatSR-5 includes other elements of the ventilation system such as dampers, the last sentence does not includethese. Suggest “….failure of any single air moving or cooling unit does not result in the loss of (add) *control or*the electrical supply to the emergency ventilation (strike next two words)*fans system* during the specified periodof operation.”


26 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Second Revision No. 7-NFPA 130-2015 [ Section No. 8.4.1 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]

]


27 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

The test procedures and minimum performance for materials and assemblies shall be as detailed in Table8.4.1.

Table 8.4.1 Fire Test Procedures and Performance Criteria for Materials and Assemblies

Category Function of Material Test MethodPerformance

Criteria

Cushioning

All individual flexible cushioning materials used in seatcushions, mattresses, mattress pads, armrests, crash

pads, and grab rail padding a–e

ASTM D3675 Is ≤ 25

ASTM E662Ds (1.5) ≤ 100

Ds (4.0) ≤ 175

Fabrics

Seat upholstery, mattress ticking and covers, curtains,draperies, window shades, and woven seat cushion

suspensionsa–c, f–h

14 CFR 25,Appendix F,Part I (verticaltest)

Flame time ≤ 10sec

Burn length ≤ 6in.

ASTM E662 Ds (4.0) ≤ 200

Seat and mattress frames, wall and ceiling lining andpanels, seat and toilet shrouds, toilet seats, trays andother tables, partitions, shelves, opaque windscreens,combustible signage, end caps, roof housings,articulation bellows, exterior shells, nonmetallic skirts,battery case material, and component boxes and

coversa,b,i–k

ASTM E162 Is ≤ 35

ASTM E662Ds (1.5) ≤ 100

Ds (4.0) ≤ 200

Other vehiclecomponents Thermal and acoustical insulationa,b

ASTM E162 Is ≤ 25

ASTM E662 Ds (4.0) ≤ 100

HVAC ductinga,bASTM E162 Is ≤ 25

ASTM E662 Ds (4.0) ≤ 100

Floor coveringb,k,l

ASTM E648 CRF ≥ 5 kW/m2

ASTM E662Ds (1.5) ≤ 100

Ds (4.0) ≤ 200

Light diffusers, windows, and transparent plastic

windscreensb,i

ASTM E162 Is ≤ 100

ASTM E662Ds (1.5) ≤ 100

Ds (4.0) ≤ 200

Adhesives and sealantsa,b

ASTM E162 Is ≤ 35

ASTM E662Ds (1.5) ≤ 100Ds(4.0) ≤ 200

Elastomersa,b,i,j Window gaskets, door nosings, intercar diaphragms,seat cushion suspension diaphragms, and roof mats

ASTM C1166Flamepropagation ≤100 mm (4 in.)

ASTM E662Ds (1.5) ≤ 100

Ds (4.0) ≤ 200

Wire and cable All

See8.6.7.1.1.1through8.6.7.1.3.

See 8.6.7.1.1.1through8.6.7.1.3.

Structural

componentsm Flooring,n othero ASTM E119 Pass

aSee 8.4.1.1.

bSee 8.4.1.2.


28 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

cSee 8.4.1.3.

dSee 8.4.1.4.

eSee 8.4.1.5.

fSee 8.4.1.6.

gSee 8.4.1.7.

hSee 8.4.1.8.

iSee 8.4.1.9.

jSee 8.4.1.10.

kSee 8.4.1.11.

lSee 8.4.1.12.

mSee 8.4.1.13.

nSee 8.4.1.14.

oSee 8.4.1.15.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

In the 2014 edition adhesives and sealants were added to the list of materials to be tested to ASTME162 and ASTM E662. Omitted in error from this change was the addition of notes a (prohibitionflame dripping and running) and b (testing for smoke emission in both the flaming and non-flamingmodes). Because of the various areas in the car the adhesive or sealant can be used, if flamerunning and dripping is not prohibited the flame running or dripping can add to the propagation of thefire to other materials in the car. Adding this note to the adhesives and sealants is consistent with therequirements of other materials in Table 8.4.1. The inclusion of note b insures that smoke emissionsin both modes are reported and evaluated. This also is consistent with the requirements for othermaterials in Table 8.4.1.

ResponseMessage:

Public Comment No. 6-NFPA 130-2015 [Section No. 8.4.1 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]]

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

23 Affirmative All


29 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Grizard, William P.

Harrison, Kevin P.


Thomas, Michael J.

Weng, Leong Kwok

White, Steven C.

Affirmative All

Casselman, David M.

Devlin, John F.



Kenny, Thomas P.

Koffel, William E.

Laurin, Pierre

Levitt, Harold L.

Lewis, Kevin M.

Li, Silas K.

Locke, Harold A.

Mao, David

Martineau, Luc

McKinney, Daniel M.

Nelsen, John

Nott, Neil E.

Peacock, Richard D.

Roman, Steven W.

Sandu, Julian

Teo, Joshua

Till, Robert C.

White, John Powell

Wilchek, Stephen B.


Alston, Jarrod

Incorporation of the notes for adhesives and sealants is appropriate. However, the table formatting, particularlythe cell borders, is brought to the editors attention. The borders for the adhesives and sealants should beconsistent with other material types to avoid confusion with respect to category, test method, or performancecriteria.


30 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Second Revision No. 20-NFPA 130-2015 [ Section No. 8.8.5.1.3 ]

8.8.5.1.3

Signs and instructions required by 8.8.5.1.1 and 8.8.5.1.2 shall meet the requirements of APTASS PR -PS-S- 002.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Nov 18 08:37:10 EST 2015

Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Editorial revision, renaming of document title.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

24 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Grizard, William P.

Harrison, Kevin P.


Thomas, Michael J.

Weng, Leong Kwok

White, Steven C.

Affirmative All

Alston, Jarrod

Casselman, David M.

Devlin, John F.


31 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM



Kenny, Thomas P.

Koffel, William E.

Laurin, Pierre

Levitt, Harold L.

Lewis, Kevin M.

Li, Silas K.

Locke, Harold A.

Mao, David

Martineau, Luc

McKinney, Daniel M.

Nelsen, John

Nott, Neil E.

Peacock, Richard D.

Roman, Steven W.

Sandu, Julian

Teo, Joshua

Till, Robert C.

White, John Powell

Wilchek, Stephen B.


32 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM


9.6.1

The authority shall operate an OCC for the operation and supervision of the system, designed inaccordance with Section 10.2 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: To provide a cross reference between chapter 9 and chapter 10 regarding OCC.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

24 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Grizard, William P.

Harrison, Kevin P.


Thomas, Michael J.

Weng, Leong Kwok

White, Steven C.

Affirmative All

Alston, Jarrod

Casselman, David M.

Devlin, John F.


33 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM



Kenny, Thomas P.

Koffel, William E.

Laurin, Pierre

Levitt, Harold L.

Lewis, Kevin M.

Li, Silas K.

Locke, Harold A.

Mao, David

Martineau, Luc

McKinney, Daniel M.

Nelsen, John

Nott, Neil E.

Peacock, Richard D.

Roman, Steven W.

Sandu, Julian

Teo, Joshua

Till, Robert C.

White, John Powell

Wilchek, Stephen B.


34 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM


10.2.9

Alternate Alternative OCC location(s) shall be provided in the event the primary OCC is out of service forany reason and shall be equipped or have equipment readily available to function as required by theauthority.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The additional wording, "OCC" and "primary", in the first line prescribe an alternative OCC asthe only solution, which may not be appropriate for some systems.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

23 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Grizard, William P.

Harrison, Kevin P.


Thomas, Michael J.

Weng, Leong Kwok

White, Steven C.

Affirmative All

Casselman, David M.


35 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Devlin, John F.



Kenny, Thomas P.

Koffel, William E.

Laurin, Pierre

Levitt, Harold L.

Lewis, Kevin M.

Li, Silas K.

Locke, Harold A.

Mao, David

Martineau, Luc

McKinney, Daniel M.

Nelsen, John

Nott, Neil E.

Peacock, Richard D.

Roman, Steven W.

Sandu, Julian

Teo, Joshua

Till, Robert C.

White, John Powell

Wilchek, Stephen B.


Alston, Jarrod

The proposed owrding is awkward with respect to requiring simply an 'alternative location' to the OCC. The rest ofthe clause, discussing equipment, while clarifyign the intent violates the NFPA MOS by resulting in multiple 'shall'statements within a single clause. The intent of the clause is to provide backup or redunant operational systems,so perhaps should read "Backup OCC functions shall be provided in an alternative location to the OCC" orsomething to that effect.


36 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Second Revision No. 14-NFPA 130-2015 [ Section No. A.5.3.4.5 ]

A.5.3.4.5

See A.5.3.3 for clarification.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Annex A.5.3.5.4 has been deleted because the cross reference was an editorial error.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

24 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Grizard, William P.

Harrison, Kevin P.


Thomas, Michael J.

Weng, Leong Kwok

White, Steven C.

Affirmative All

Alston, Jarrod

Casselman, David M.

Devlin, John F.


37 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM



Kenny, Thomas P.

Koffel, William E.

Laurin, Pierre

Levitt, Harold L.

Lewis, Kevin M.

Li, Silas K.

Locke, Harold A.

Mao, David

Martineau, Luc

McKinney, Daniel M.

Nelsen, John

Nott, Neil E.

Peacock, Richard D.

Roman, Steven W.

Sandu, Julian

Teo, Joshua

Till, Robert C.

White, John Powell

Wilchek, Stephen B.


38 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Second Revision No. 10-NFPA 130-2015 [ Section No. A.5.3.10 ]

A.5.3.10

Tactile and visual warning should be provided along the trainway side of platforms where the platform ismore than 760 mm (30 in.) above the surface of the adjacent trainway except where such edges areprotected by platform edge screens or doors.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The deleted text conflicts with ADA guidelines.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Grizard, William P.

Harrison, Kevin P.


Thomas, Michael J.

Weng, Leong Kwok

White, Steven C.

Affirmative All

Alston, Jarrod

Casselman, David M.


39 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Devlin, John F.



Kenny, Thomas P.

Koffel, William E.

Levitt, Harold L.

Lewis, Kevin M.

Li, Silas K.

Locke, Harold A.

Mao, David

Martineau, Luc

McKinney, Daniel M.

Nelsen, John

Nott, Neil E.

Peacock, Richard D.

Roman, Steven W.

Sandu, Julian

Teo, Joshua

White, John Powell

Wilchek, Stephen B.


Laurin, Pierre

Committee Statement is that "the deleted text conflicts with ADA guidelines". As NFPA-130 is an internationalstandard, this is too restrictive outside of the U.S.; for example Ontario's Building Code requirement is 250 mmheight difference.

Till, Robert C.

The text of the Standard states only that tactile and visual warnings should be incorporated …. not shall, and therevised wording removes any prescriptive dimensions.


40 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Second Revision No. 23-NFPA 130-2015 [ Section No. A.8.4.1.15 ]

A.8.4.1.15

ASTM E2061 and APTA RP PR - PS-RP- 005-01a 00 both describe and discuss passenger-carryingvehicle fire scenarios. (See also Annex E.)




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Editorial, align with referenced document.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

23 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Grizard, William P.

Harrison, Kevin P.


Thomas, Michael J.

Weng, Leong Kwok

White, Steven C.

Affirmative All

Casselman, David M.

Devlin, John F.



41 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM


Kenny, Thomas P.

Koffel, William E.

Laurin, Pierre

Levitt, Harold L.

Lewis, Kevin M.

Li, Silas K.

Locke, Harold A.

Mao, David

Martineau, Luc

McKinney, Daniel M.

Nelsen, John

Nott, Neil E.

Peacock, Richard D.

Roman, Steven W.

Sandu, Julian

Teo, Joshua

Till, Robert C.

White, John Powell

Wilchek, Stephen B.


Alston, Jarrod

The update to the reference is correct except in that there are hyphens missing from the document ID. Thedocument number and name are:APTA PR-PS-RP-005-00 Recommended Practice for Fire Safety Analysis ofExisting Passenger Rail Equipment


42 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Second Revision No. 18-NFPA 130-2015 [ Section No. B.2.1.5 ]


43 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

B.2.1.5 Noise Levels.


44 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Criteria for noise levels should be established for the various situations and potential exposures particularto the environments addressed by this standard. The intent of the recommended criteria is to maintain atleast a minimal level of speech intelligibility along emergency evacuation routes. This might requireadditional noise control measures and acoustical treatment to achieve. Exceptions taken to therecommended noise levels for reasons of cost and feasibility should be as few and as slight as reasonablypossible. For example, local area exceptions to the recommended acoustic criteria could be required to beapplied for defined limited distances along the evacuation path that are near active noise sources. Othermeans of providing emergency evacuation guidance using acoustic, nonacoustic, or combined methodsmight be considered. Recommendations Starting points for noise criteria for various design scenariosare as should be considered as follows:

(1) In general, noise levels should not exceed the following: Where reliance on unamplified speech isused as part of the emergency response inside a tunnel, the speech interference level (SIL) duringemergency response from all active systems measured along the path of evacuation at any point1.52 m (5 ft) above the walking surface should not exceed 78 dBZ L eq “slow” over any period of 1

minute, using the arithmetic average of unweighted sound pressure level in the 500, 1000, 2000 and4000 Hz octave bands.

During emergency response, the sound pressure level from all active systems measuredinside a tunnel along the path of evacuation at any point 5 ft (1.52 m) above the walkingsurface should not exceed 94 dBA L eq “low” for a period of 1 hour and should at no time

exceed 140 dBZ peak [ISO 1999, EU Directive 2003/10/EC, and Canada Occupational Safetyand Health Regulations, SOR/86-304, Part VII )].

The sound pressure level from all active systems measured where staff would be present formaintenance and testing and where hearing protection is not available should not exceed 85dBA TWA “slow” for a period of 8 hours and should at no time exceed 140 dBZ peak [29 CFR1910.95 (OSHA)].

(2) Where reliance on unamplified speech is used as part of the emergency response, duringemergency response, the sound interference level (SIL) from all active systems measured inside atunnel along the path of evacuation at any point 5 ft (1.52 m) above the walking surface should notexceed 78 dBZ L eq “slow” over any period of 1 minute, using the arithmetic average of

un-weighted sound pressure level in the 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz octave bands For intelligiblecommunication between emergency evacuation responders and the public, where reliance onamplified speech is used as part of the emergency response within a station, refer to NFPA 72 .

(3) For intelligible communication between emergency evacuation responders and the public wherereliance upon amplified speech is used as part of the emergency response within a station thefollowing applies: Where reliance on amplified speech is used as part of the emergency responsewithin a tunnel, the sound pressure level from all active systems measured inside a tunnel along thepath of evacuation at any point 1.52 m (5 ft) above the walking surface should be designed tosupport speech intelligibility of fixed voice communication systems to achieve a measured STI of notless than 0.45 (0.65 CIS) and an average STI of not less than 0.5 (0.7 CIS) as per D.2.4.1 of NFPA72 . Refer to Annex D of NFPA 72 for further information on speech intelligibility for voicecommunication systems.

During emergency response, the sound pressure level from all active systems measuredinside a station along the path of evacuation at any point 5 ft (1.52 m) above the walkingsurface where a voice communication system is intended to be used should not exceed thehigher of 70 dBA L eq “slow” measured over any 1 minute period or 10 dB below the

measured voice communication system sound pressure level in the octave bands greaterthan 63 Hz with a steady-state red noise input signal set to the maximum A-weighted settingof the voice communication system (if the voice communication system has an ambientsensing microphone).

The speech intelligibility of voice communication systems under the same conditions and forthe same spaces should achieve a measured STI of not less than 0.45 (0.65 CIS) and anaverage STI of not less than 0.5 (0.7 CIS) as per D.2.4.1 of NFPA 72 . Refer to Annex D ofNFPA 72 for further information on speech intelligibility for voice communication systems.

The STI criterion is more stringent than the noise level limit and might require additional noisecontrol measures and acoustical treatment to achieve.

Where reliance upon amplified speech is used as part of the emergency response within a tunnel,


45 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

the following applies:

Where a voice communication system is intended to be used within a tunnel, duringemergency response, the sound pressure level from all active systems measured inside atunnel along the path of evacuation at any point 5 ft (1.52 m) above the walking surfaceshould not exceed – 75 dBA L eq “slow” measured over any period of 1 minute.

The speech intelligibility of fixed voice communication systems under the same conditionsand for the same spaces should achieve a measured STI of not less than 0.45 (0.65 CIS)and an average STI of not less than 0.5 (0.7 CIS) as per D.2.4.1 of NFPA 72 . Refer toAnnex D of NFPA 72 for further information on speech intelligibility for voice communicationsystems.

The STI criterion is more stringent than the noise level limit and might require additionalnoise control measures and acoustical treatment to achieve.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Sep 30 12:02:24 EDT 2015

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Second draft proposal removed the entire First Draft proposal which was found to have merit.Annex B.2.1.5 as proposed in the First Draft contained excessive prescriptive requirements thatwould have caused concerns if adopted into legislation. The modified text as adopted addressesboth of these concerns.

ResponseMessage:

Public Comment No. 20-NFPA 130-2015 [Section No. B.2.1.5]

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Grizard, William P.

Harrison, Kevin P.


Thomas, Michael J.


46 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Weng, Leong Kwok

White, Steven C.

Affirmative All

Casselman, David M.

Devlin, John F.


Kenny, Thomas P.

Koffel, William E.

Laurin, Pierre

Levitt, Harold L.

Lewis, Kevin M.

Li, Silas K.

Mao, David

Martineau, Luc

McKinney, Daniel M.

Nelsen, John

Nott, Neil E.

Peacock, Richard D.

Roman, Steven W.

Sandu, Julian

Teo, Joshua

White, John Powell

Wilchek, Stephen B.


Alston, Jarrod

Although the revised text limits the prescriptive content of the proposed Annex and defers to NFPA 72 whereappropriate, as written the language may still be interpreted to impose noise limitations within the tunnel that maynot be practical in that environment. As written, the language implies that some level of noise limitations arerequired as there will either be uamplified or amplified communications. Audible or voice communication systemsare not requirements under Chapter 6; as such the proposed language (while not statutory being in Annex B)imposes restrictions that are not aligned with trainway requirements. It is believed that the intent of the workinggroup was to develop recommended noise levels only for instances in which some form of voice communicationforms part of the tunnel fire/life safety strategy. The efforts of the working group are recognized; it is preferrablethat the work done to date is not lost. The issue can be addressed through inclusion of an additional sub-clausethat identifies noise levels appropriate to trainways not utilizing audible communication systems (such as painthresholds or similar).


I agree with Mr. Alston’s comments that the proposed new language may be interpreted to impose noiselimitations that are unreasonable in a tunnel environment. Language that clarifies the intent while being lessprescriptive would be more appropriate.

Locke, Harold A.

I agree with Mr. Alstom's comment

Till, Robert C.

Referring to the revised text, subclause (2) is appropriate, subclause (3) is correct and lists the correct STI and


47 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

CIS levels. The concern is with the SIL (subclause (1)) as follows: a. SIL is more commonly an acronym for“Safety Integrity Level” which is a different and could be misleading . Noted that it is defined in the subclause, butSIL is ONLY used in the subclause and therefore it would be better to not provide the acronym. b. Moreimportantly, 78 dBZ will be near impossible to achieve if the system has a jet fan, or if egress goes near asaccardo nozzle or an axial fan. Noise levels for jet fans are usually specified internationally to be able to meet anin-tunnel noise level of Noise Rating 85 (NR 85) at a distance of 1.5m above the walking surface. (Note that this isstill extremely difficult to achieve in practice). In the US, NR is more typically denoted as NC. The NR curve moreclosely follows the human ear perception. So while 78 dbZ would be nice, I think it is only practical in largesystems where fans are operating a considerable distance away from the egress path, and where the fan systemsdo not include jet fans. A more reasonable specified level would be 85NR.


48 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Second Revision No. 21-NFPA 130-2015 [ Section No. E.2 ]

E.2 Fire Hazard Analysis.

The prescriptive-based vehicle fire performance requirements in Chapter 8 of this standard are based onindividual material tests. With the use of the fire hazard analysis process, it should be possible toascertain the fire performance of vehicle materials and assemblies in the context of actual use. The resultof such a fire hazard analysis should be a clear understanding of the role of materials, geometry, andother factors in the development of fire in the specific vehicles studied. By identifying when or if specificconditions are reached such that materials begin to contribute to the fire hazard, fixed guideway transitand passenger rail systems vehicle designers and authorities having jurisdiction will have a betterfoundation on which to base appropriate vehicle and system design and the evaluation of the fireperformance of such vehicle designs. By showing the relative contribution of a particular design feature ormaterial, it is possible to make a more realistic assessment of the necessity for specific vehicle designrequirements to meet fire/life safety objectives and criteria.

The SFPE Engineering Guide to Performance-Based Fire Protection Analysis and Design of Buildings [2]provides a framework for these assessments. Other useful references include ASTM E2061 [3] and APTARP PR- PS-RP- 005-01a 00 [4]. On May 12, 1999, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) issued arule containing passenger rail equipment fire safety regulations [5]. The FRA issued a clarification/revisionof the fire safety regulations on June 25, 2002 [6]. 49 CFR 238.103 requires that materials used forpassenger rail cars and locomotive cabs meet certain fire safety performance criteria and that fire safety(e.g., hazard) analysis be conducted for all new and existing rail passenger equipment.

In addition, scenarios are used to assess the adequacy of vehicle designs considered and ultimatelyselected. Accordingly, initiating events as referenced from the ASTM rail fire assessment guide [3] arespecified for analysis. Although developed for the analysis of existing equipment, the APTA-recommendedfire safety practice provides a framework and resources for the application of fire hazard analysis invehicles that might be applicable to new or retrofitted equipment.

Finally, it is important to note that the fire hazards relating to the vehicle-operating environment must beconsidered.

If the outcome predicted by assessment of the scenarios evaluated is bound by the performance criteriastated, then the objectives will have been met, and the life safety characteristics of a proposed vehicledesign can be considered to be consistent with the goals of this standard. It must be assumed that if adesign fails to comply with the life safety goals and objectives and associated performance criteria, thedesign must be changed and reassessed iteratively until satisfactory performance levels are attained.

On June 25, 2002, the FRA published a Federal Register Notice that clarified several items relating to thefire tests and performance criteria, and revised certain parts of the fire safety analysis requirements [6].

Documentation of assessment parameters, such as those used with scenarios, is critical. The approvaland acceptance of a fire/life safety design is dependent on the quality of the documentation used in thisprocess.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


49 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM


Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

24 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Grizard, William P.

Harrison, Kevin P.


Thomas, Michael J.

Weng, Leong Kwok

White, Steven C.

Affirmative All

Alston, Jarrod

Casselman, David M.

Devlin, John F.



Kenny, Thomas P.

Koffel, William E.

Laurin, Pierre

Levitt, Harold L.

Lewis, Kevin M.

Li, Silas K.

Locke, Harold A.

Mao, David

Martineau, Luc

McKinney, Daniel M.

Nelsen, John

Nott, Neil E.

Peacock, Richard D.

Roman, Steven W.

Sandu, Julian


50 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Teo, Joshua

Till, Robert C.

White, John Powell

Wilchek, Stephen B.


51 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Second Revision No. 22-NFPA 130-2015 [ Section No. E.4 ]

E.4 References.

The following references are cited in this annex.

(1) NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, Quincy, MA: NFPA, 2012.

(2) SFPE Engineering Guide to Performance-Based Fire Protection Analysis and Design of Buildings,Bethesda, MD: Society of Fire Protection Engineers, 2000.

(3) ASTM E2061, Guide for Fire Hazard Assessment of Rail Transportation Vehicles. WestConshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2003.

(4) APTA RP PR- PS-RP- 005-01 00 , Recommended Practice for Fire Safety Analysis of ExistingPassenger Rail Equipment, Washington, DC: American Public Transportation Association, August2000 Approved November 1, 2000, edited 3/22/2004 .

(5) Federal Railroad Administration, 49 CFR, Transportation, Parts 216, 223, 229, 231, 232, and 238,“Passenger Equipment Safety Standards: Final Rule.” Federal Register, Vol. 64, No. 91, May 12,1999, 25540–25705. Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration.

(6) Federal Railroad Administration, 49 CFR, Transportation, Parts 216, 223, 229, 231, 232, and 238,“Passenger Equipment Safety Standards: Final Rule.” Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 102, June 25,2002, 42892-42912. Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration.

(7) Peacock, R. D., et al. Fire Safety of Passenger Trains, Phase II, Application of Fire Hazard AnalysisTechniques. Prepared for Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), U.S. Department of Transportation(USDOT). National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Interim Report, Report No.DOT/FRA/ORD 01/16, December 2001, and NISTIR 6525, December 2002.

(8) Bukowski, R. W., et al. Fire Hazard Assessment Method, NIST Handbook 146, Gaithersburg, MD:NIST, 1989.

(9) Fleming, J. M., “Code Official's View of Performance-Based Codes,” Research and Practice: Bridgingthe Gap, Proceedings, Fire Suppression and Detection Research Application Symposium, NFPAResearch Foundation, Orlando, FL, February 12–14, 1997, pp. 234–251.

(10) Gross, D. “The Use of Fire Statistics in Assessing the Fire Risk of Products,” Interflam 1985Conference Workbook, No. 26–28, March 1985, pp. 11–18.

(11) Karter, M. J., Jr. “Fire Loss in the United States During 1984,” Fire Journal, Vol. 79, No. 3: 67–70, 73,75–76, September 1985.

(12) Aherns, M., U.S. Vehicle Fire Trends and Patterns for Rail Transport Vehicle Fires: U.S. RailPassenger or Diner Car Fires 1986–1997. Quincy, MA: NFPA, 1999.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement



52 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

24 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Grizard, William P.

Harrison, Kevin P.


Thomas, Michael J.

Weng, Leong Kwok

White, Steven C.

Affirmative All

Alston, Jarrod

Casselman, David M.

Devlin, John F.



Kenny, Thomas P.

Koffel, William E.

Laurin, Pierre

Levitt, Harold L.

Lewis, Kevin M.

Li, Silas K.

Locke, Harold A.

Mao, David

Martineau, Luc

McKinney, Daniel M.

Nelsen, John

Nott, Neil E.

Peacock, Richard D.

Roman, Steven W.

Sandu, Julian

Teo, Joshua


53 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Till, Robert C.

White, John Powell

Wilchek, Stephen B.


54 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Second Revision No. 2-NFPA 130-2015 [ Chapter I ]

Annex I Informational References

I.1 Referenced Publications.

The documents or portions thereof listed in this annex are referenced within the informational sections ofthis standard and are not part of the requirements of this document unless also listed in Chapter 2 forother reasons.

I.1.1 NFPA Publications.

National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471.

NFPA 72 ® National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code , 2016 edition.

NFPA 101®, Life Safety Code®, 2015 edition.

NFPA 472, Standard for Competence of Responders to Hazardous Materials/Weapons of MassDestruction Incidents, 2013 edition.

NFPA 1006, Standard for Technical Rescuer Professional Qualifications, 2017 2013 edition.

NFPA 1670, Standard on Operations and Training for Technical Search and Rescue Incidents, 2017 2014edition.

I.1.2 Other Publications.

I.1.2.1 ANSI Publications.

American National Standards Institute, Inc., 25 West 43rd Street, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10036.

ANSI/ASME A17.1, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators , 2013.

ANSI/ASA S3.5, American National Standard Methods for Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index,American National Standards Institute, Inc., New York, NY 1997 (R2007).

ANSI S12.65 American National Standard for Rating Noice with Respect to Speech Interference,American National Standards Institute, Inc., New York, NY 2006 (R2011).

I.1.2.1 APTA Publications.

American Public Transportation Association, 1666 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.

APTA PR-PS-RP- 005-00 , Recommended Practice for Fire Safety Analysis of Existing Passenger RailEquipment, 2001 2000, edited 3/22/2004 .

APTA PR-E-S-013-99, Rev 1, Standard for Emergency Lighting Design for Passenger Cars, 1999, revised2007.

I.1.2.2 ASHRAE Publications.

American Society of Heating, Refigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers ASHRAE Inc., 1791 TullieCircle, NE, Atlanta, GA 30329-2305.

ASHRAE Handbook – Fundamentals, 2013.

ASHRAE Handbook – Applications, 2015.

ASHRAE Handbook – Systems and Equipment , 2012.

I.1.2.3 ASME Publications.

ASME Technical Publishing Office, Two Park Avenue, New York NY 10016-5990.

ANSI/ASME A17.1, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators , 2013.


55 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

I.1.2.4 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM D3675, Standard Test Method for Surface Flammability of Flexible Cellular Materials Using aRadiant Heat Energy Source, 2014.

ASTM E162, Standard Test Method for Surface Flammability of Materials Using a Radiant Heat EnergySource, 2013.

ASTM E662, Standard Test Method for Specific Optical Density of Smoke Generated by Solid Materials,2014 2015 .

ASTM E1354, Standard Test Method for Heat and Visible Smoke Release Rates for Materials andProducts Using an Oxygen Consumption Calorimeter, 2014 2015a .

ASTM E1537, Standard Test Method for Fire Testing of Upholstered Furniture, 2013.

ASTM E1590, Standard Test Method for Fire Testing of Mattresses, 2013.

ASTM E2061, Standard Guide for Fire Hazard Assessment of Rail Transportation Vehicles, 2012.

I.1.2.5 EN CENELEC Publications.

CENELEC, 35, Rue de Stassartstraat, B-1050 European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization,CEN-CENELEC Management Centre, Avenue Marnix 17, 4th floor, B-1000 , Brussels, Belgium .

EN 50124-1 , Railway Applications — Insulation Coordination, . Part 1: Basic Requirements —Clearances and Creepage Distances for All Electrical and Electronic Equipment, 2001, revised 2010.

I.1.2.6 FAA Publications.

U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Government Printing Publishing Office, Washington, DC20402.

FAR 25.853(c), Oil Burner Test for Seat Cushions.

I.1.2.8 FTA Publications.

Federal Transit Administration, 400 7th Street SW, Washington, DC 20590.

Subway Environmental Design Handbook , 1975.

I.1.2.7 ISO Publications.

International Organization for Standardization, 1, ch. de la Voie-Creuse, CP 56, CH-1211 ISO CentralSecretariat, BIBC II, Chemin de Blandonnet 8, CP 401, 1214 Vernier, Geneva, 20, Switzerland.

ISO 1999, Acoustics – Estimation of noise-induced hearing loss, International Organization forStandardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.

ISO/DIS 13571, Life threat from fires — Guidance on the estimation of time available for escape usingfire data , 2006.

I.1.2.8 NIST Publications.

National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-1070.

NIST IR 4730, Routine for Analysis of the People Movement Time for Elevator Evacuation, Klote andAlvord, 1992.

I.1.2.9 OSHA Publications.

Occupational Safety & and Health Administration, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20210.

Title 29, CFR Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1910.95, “Occupational Noise Exposure,” 2008.

I.1.2.10 SFPE Publications.

Society of Fire Protection Engineers, 7315 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1225 W, Bethesda 9711Washingtonian Blvd, Suite 380, Gaithersburg , MD 20814 20878 .

SFPE Engineering Guide to Performance-Based Fire Protection Analysis and Design of Buildings, 2007.


56 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

I.1.2.11 TDC Publications.

Transit Development Corporation, Inc., 1666 K St. NW, Washington, DC 20006.

Subway Environmental Design Handbook: Vol. 1, Principles and Applications, 2nd edition, 1976.Associated Engineers: A joint venture by Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, Inc.; Deleuw, Catherand Company; and Kaiser Engineers under the direction of TDC, Inc.

I.1.2.12

Bothe C., G.M. Wolinski and A. J. Breunese “Spalling of concrete tunnel linings in fire,” (Re)Claimingthe Underground Space, J. Sauver, ed., pp. 227–231, Swets & Zeitlinger Lisse, 2003..

Khoury, G.A. Passive protection against fire. Tunnels and Tunneling International, pp. 40–42. November2002.

Subway Environmental Design Handbook (SEDH), National Technical Information, December 1993.

Tatnall, P.C. “Shotcrete in Fires: Effects of Fibers on Explosive Spalling,”, American ShotcreteAssociation, Farmington Hills, Michigan, 2002.


57 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

I.1.2.12 Other Publications.


58 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

"Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals," Vol. 8, Committee on AcuteExposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, National Research Council. National AcademiesPress, Washington DC, 2010.

Ahrens, M., U.S. Vehicle Fire Trends and Patterns for Rail Transport Vehicle Fires: U.S. Rail Passenger orDiner Car Fires 1986–1997. Quincy, MA: NFPA, 1999.

Bothe C., G. M. Wolinski, and A. J. Breunese, "Spalling of concrete tunnel linings in fire," (Re)Claiming theUnderground Space, J. Saveur, ed., pp. 227–231, Swets & Zeitlinger Lisse, 2003.

Bukowski, R. W., et al. Fire Hazard Assessment Method, NIST Handbook 146, Gaithersburg, MD: NIST,1989.

Chiam, Boon Hui, “Numerical Simulation of a Metro Train Fire,” Fire Engineering Research Report 05/1,Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, June 2005.

“Escalator Handling Capacity,” Elevator World, December 1996.

EU Directive 2003/10/EC, “Directive 2003/10/EC of the European parliament and of the Council of 6February 2003 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to therisks arising from physical agents (noise),” European Parliament, Council of the European Union, 2008.

Federal Railroad Administration, Title 49, CFR Code of Federal Regulations , Transportation, Parts 216,223, 229, 231, 232, and 238, “Passenger Equipment Safety Standards: Final Rule.” Federal Register, Vol.64, No. 91, May 12, 1999, 25540–25705. Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration.

Federal Railroad Administration, Title 49, CFR Code of Federal Regulations , Transportation, Part 238,“Passenger Equipment Safety Standards: Final r R ules,” Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 122, June 25,2014, 42892-42912. Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration.

Fleming, J. M., “Code Official's View of Performance-Based Codes,” Research and Practice: Bridging theGap, Proceedings, Fire Suppression and Detection Research Application Symposium, NFPA ResearchFoundation, Orlando, FL, February 12–14, 1997, pp. 234–251.

Fruin, J. J. Pedestrian Planning and Design. 1979 (revised ed.). Mobile, AL: Elevator World Inc.,Educational Services Division, 354 Morgan Avenue, Mobile, AL, 36606.

Gross, D. “The Use of Fire Statistics in Assessing the Fire Risk of Products,” Interflam 1985 ConferenceWorkbook, No. 26–28, March 1985, pp. 11–18.

Hadjisophcleous, G., Lee, D.H. and Park, W.H., “Full-scale Experiments for Heat Release RateMeasurements of Railcar Fires,” presented at the Fifth International Symposium on Tunnel Safety andSecurity, New York, 14–16 March, 2012.

Hirschler, M. M., “A New Mattress Fire Test for Use in Detention Environments,” BusinessCommunications Company Eighth Annual Conference on Recent Advances in Flame Retardancy ofPolymeric Materials, Stamford, CT, June 2–4, 1997.

Karter, M. J., Jr. “Fire Loss in the United States During 1984,” Fire Journal, Vol. 79, No. 3: 67–70, 73,75–76, September 1985.

Kennedy, W.D., Ray, R.E., and Guinan, J.W., “A Short History of Train Fire Heat Release Calculations,”presented at the 1998 ASHRAE Annual Meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, June 1998.

Khoury, G.A. “Passive Protection Against Fire,” Tunnels and Tunneling International , pp. 40–42.November 2002.

Kuligowski, E. D., "Compilation of Data on the Sublethal Effects of Fire Effluent," Technical Note 1644,National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2009.

Li, S., Louie, A., and Fuster, E. “The Impacts of Train Fire Profiles on Station Ventilation System Design,”presented at the 15th International Symposium on Aerodynamics, Ventilation & Fire in Tunnels,Barcelona, Spain, 18–20 September 2013.

London Underground Ltd., LUL Station Planning Guidelines, London, 2015.

Lonnemark, A., et al., “Large-scale Commuter Train Fire Tests — Results from the METRO Project,”presented at the Fifth International Symposium on Tunnel Safety and Security, New York, 14–16 March2012.

Ontario Building Code, “Rapid Transit Stations,” Canada, 2012.

Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, Inc., “Subway Environmental Design Handbook (SEDH),


59 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Volume II, Subway Environment Simulation Computer Program, SES Version 4.1, Part I User’s Manual,”2nd edition, February 2002, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.

Peacock, R. D., et al. Fire Safety of Passenger Trains, Phase II, Application of Fire Hazard AnalysisTechniques. Prepared for Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), U.S. Department of Transportation(USDOT). National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Interim Report, Report No. DOT/FRA/ORD-01/16, December 2001 and NISTR 6825, December 2002.

Schachenmayr, Martin P. Application Guidelines for the Egress Element of the Fire Protection Standardfor Fixed Guideway Transit Systems , Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, 1998.

Sørlie, R. and Mathisen, H.M., EUREKA-EU 499 Firetun-Project: Fire Protection in Traffic Tunnels,SINTEF, Applied Thermodynamics, 1994.

SOR/86-304, Part VII, “Level of Sound,” Canada Occupational Health and Safety Regulations,Government of Canada, 2013.

Strege, S., B. Y. Lattimer, and C. Beyler. January 2003. “Fire Induced Failure of Polycarbonate Windows inRailcars,” Proceedings of Fire and Materials. London, UK: Interscience Communications, Ltd., 269–278,January 2003 .

Subway Environmental Design Handbook (SEDH) , National Technical Information, December 1993.

Tatnall, P.C. “Shotcrete in Fires: Effects of Fibers on Explosive Spalling,” American Shotcrete Association,Farmington Hills, Michigan, 2002.

White, N., Dowling, V., and Barnett, J., “Full-scale Fire Experiment on a Typical Passenger Train, in FireSafety Science,” Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium, Beijing, International Association forFire Safety Science, Boston, MA, 2005.

I.2 Informational References.

The following documents or portions thereof are listed here as informational resources only. They are nota part of the requirements of this document.

ANSI/ASA S3.5, American National Standard Methods for Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index ,1997 (R2012).

ANSI/ASA S12.65, American National Standard for Rating Noise with Respect to Speech Interference ,2006 (R2011).

BS EN 50129, Railway Applications. Communication, Signaling and Processing Systems. Safety-RelatedElectronic Systems for Signaling, 2003, Corrigendum 2010 .

Building Type Basics for Transit Facilities, K. W. Griffin, ed., John Wiley & Sons, 2004.

Friedman, R. “An International Survey of Computer Models for Fire and Smoke,” SFPE Journal of FireProtection Engineering, 4(3), 1992, pp. 81–92.

International Standards Organization Technical Committee 92/SC 3/WG5, “ISO 13571 — Life ThreateningComponents of Fire — Guidance on the Estimation of Time to Compromised Tenability in Fires.”Document ISO/TC 92/SC 3/N203, 2012.

ISO 1999, Acoustics — Estimation of noise-induced hearing loss , 2013.

MIL-STD 882D, Standard Practice for System Safety, 2000 2012 .

NFPA Fire Protection Handbook, 20th edition, 2008.

Smith, Edwin E., Phase I Report, Transit Vehicle Material Specification Using Release Rate Tests forFlammability and Smoke, October 1976.

Society of Fire Protection Engineers. SFPE Engineering Guide to Predicting 1st and 2nd Degree SkinBurns, 1st Edition, Bethesda, MD, 2000.

NFPA Fire Protection Handbook , 20th edition, 2008.

I.3 References for Extracts in Informational Sections.

NFPA 921, Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations, 2014 edition.



60 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM



Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Sep 27 19:24:18 EDT 2015

Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Updated per NFPA MOS.

Response Message:

Public Comment No. 5-NFPA 130-2015 [Section No. I.1.2.4]

Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 130-2015 [Chapter I]

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

24 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Grizard, William P.

Harrison, Kevin P.


Thomas, Michael J.

Weng, Leong Kwok

White, Steven C.

Affirmative All

Alston, Jarrod

Casselman, David M.

Devlin, John F.



Kenny, Thomas P.

Koffel, William E.

Laurin, Pierre

Levitt, Harold L.

Lewis, Kevin M.


61 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

Li, Silas K.

Locke, Harold A.

Mao, David

Martineau, Luc

McKinney, Daniel M.

Nelsen, John

Nott, Neil E.

Peacock, Richard D.

Roman, Steven W.

Sandu, Julian

Teo, Joshua

Till, Robert C.

White, John Powell

Wilchek, Stephen B.


62 of 62 1/14/2016 4:22 PM

National Fire Protection Association Report · 2016-04-05 · Second Revision No. 1-NFPA 130-2015 [ Chapter 2 ] Chapter 2 Referenced Publications 2.1 General. The documents or portions

Documents