Najdorf [B90−B99] Written by GM John Fedorowicz, GM Tony Kosten & IM Richard Palliser Last updated Sunday, 17 July 2011 XIIIIIIIIY 9rsnlwqkvl tr0 9+p+ zppzpp0 9p+ zp sn +0 9+ + + + 0 9 + sNP+ +0 9+ sN + + 0 9PzPP+ zPPzP0 9tR vLQmKL+R0 xiiiiiiiiy he Najdorf is very popular in grandmaster chess and at lower levels. I have the greatest respect for this opening, Black plays for a win from the word go. Players who face the Najdorf very often shy away from the challenge play 'solidly' and wind up in inferior positions. T At this time 6 ¥g5, which was considered to be White's main reply looks to have fallen out of favor, still that may change now that Luther has recommended this treatment in the book Experts vs the Sicilian. At the higher levels, though, it has been replaced by 6 ¥e3, the English Attack, planning f3, £d2, and long castles. The reply 6...¤g4 7 ¥g5 h6 8 ¥h4 g5 has fallen out of favour, to be replaced by 6...e5 and 6...e6. Of course we'll keep an eye out for White's other tries. 6 g3, 6 f4, 6 ¥c4 and 6 ¥e2 are all reasonable alternatives.
67
Embed
Najdorf [B90 B99] - Time to get classyterrycucf.weebly.com/uploads/1/9/2/9/19295043/najdorf.pdf · Najdorf [B90−B99] Written by GM John Fedorowicz, GM Tony Kosten & IM Richard Palliser
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Najdorf [B90−B99]
Written by GM John Fedorowicz, GM Tony Kosten & IM Richard Palliser
he Najdorf is very popular in grandmaster chess and at lower levels. I have the
greatest respect for this opening, Black plays for a win from the word go. Players
who face the Najdorf very often shy away from the challenge play 'solidly' and
wind up in inferior positions.
T At this time 6 ¥g5, which was considered to be White's main reply looks to have
fallen out of favor, still that may change now that Luther has recommended this treatment in
the book Experts vs the Sicilian.
At the higher levels, though, it has been replaced by 6 ¥e3, the English Attack,
planning f3, £d2, and long castles. The reply 6...¤g4 7 ¥g5 h6 8 ¥h4 g5 has fallen out of
favour, to be replaced by 6...e5 and 6...e6.
Of course we'll keep an eye out for White's other tries. 6 g3, 6 f4, 6 ¥c4 and 6 ¥e2
are all reasonable alternatives.
I particularly recommend that viewers check out Black's replies to the trendy 6 ¦g1.
There are several decent ways of meeting this, I was very impressed by GM Topalov's
treatment. Fed
All the game references highlighted in blue have been annotated and can be downloaded in PGN form using the PGN Games Archive on www.chesspublishing.com.
This Keres−style move had a brief vogue, other rare moves: 6.¥d3 is rare, but not innocuous as Michael Adams had some success with it. 6...¤c6 my
preference, asking the question of the white knight, 7.¤xc6 bxc6 8.0-0 e5 see Dgebuadze,A−Wemmers,X/Belgium BEL 2004.
6.h3 This and 6 ¦g1 made a brief appearance in the mid 90s, but the surprise value wore off quickly. 6...e5
a) Typical Najdorf play, but I prefer 6...e6 as Black can equalize easily with this and should, 7.g4 b5
a1) 7...d5! Compare this position with the moves a6 and h3 omitted. In the Keres Attack d5 is met by an annoying ¥b5+. Here it doesn't exist. 8.¥g2 (8.¤de2!? Vallejo Pons,F−Van Wely,L/World Open, King of Prussia 2010, 8.exd5 ¤xd5 is most common) 8...¥b4 Tseitlin,M−Efimenko,Z/Panormo GRE 2001
8.¥g2 ¥b7 9.0-0!? plans a sacrifice on d5, 9...¤c6 (9...£c7 10.¦e1 ¤fd7? loses to 11.a4! bxa4
12.¤d5! Haslinger,S−Gurevich,V/Bundesliga 2009) 10.¤xc6 (10.¦e1 first may be more potent) 10...¥xc6 11.¦e1 Carlsen,M−Dominguez Perez,L/Biel 2008.
b) 6...g6 7.g4 ¥g7 8.¥g2 0-0 9.¥e3 ¤c6 is a Dragon−like set−up, Dominguez Perez,L−Carlsen,M/MTel Masters, Sofia 2009
c) 6...¤c6!? 7.¥e3 e5 8.¤f3 ¥e7 Nepomniachtchi,I−Grischuk,A/Russian Team Championship, Dagomys 2010.
5
7.¤de2 (7.¤f3 ¤bd7 8.a4 £c7 9.¥e3 ¥e7 Nepomniachtchi,I−Lastin,A/Russian Rapid Championship, Olginka 2011) 7...£a5 8.¥d2 £c7 9.g4 h6 10.¥g2 White should be happy with this setup, Rojas,L−Vasquez,R/Santiago CHI 2004.
6.a4 A subtle move, White often plays this move anyway (except when he wants to play long castles), to stop ...b5, so why not play it immediately? 6...e5!? (6...¤c6 is logical, see Howell,D−Palliser,R/British Rapidplay, Halifax 2010.) 7.¤f3 £c7 Black stops ¥c4, (7...¥e7 8.¥g5 ¥e6 9.¥xf6 ¥xf6 10.¤d5 ¤d7 11.¥c4 ¦c8 12.b3 £a5+ also seems OK, Kamsky,G−Topalov,V/3rd matchgame, Kazan 2011) 8.¥g5 ¤bd7 9.¤d2 h6 10.¥h4 g5 11.¥g3 ¤c5 Hansen,S−Nakamura,H/Copenhagen/Malmoe DEN 2005.
6.£e2!? Balinov's move. White has in mind early queenside castling, but delays the development of the bishop: it might go to g5 or e3. 6...e5 7.¤f5 g6 8.¤e3 (8.¤h6!? is more ambitious) 8...¥e6 9.g3 h5 10.¥g2 h4 11.0-0 with equality, Romero Holmes,A−Harikrishna,P/San Sebastian ESP 2006.
6.£f3!? A good surprise weapon against the Najdorf, recommended in 'Dangerous Weapons: The Sicilian'. 6...g6
a) 6...¤bd7 7.¥e2 g6 8.¥e3 ¥g7 9.h3! Short,N−Grandelius,N/Malmo 2009 b) 6...e6 7.¥e3 (7.¥e2 ¤bd7!? 8.g4!? Howell,D−Palliser,R/British Rapidplay Ch.,
Halifax 2009) 7...¥e7 8.g4 ¤c6 9.g5 ¤d7 10.h4 the position very much resembles a Keres Attack, Jones,G−Eggleston,D/British Championship, Torquay 2009
7.h3 ¥g7 8.¥e3 ¥d7!? 9.0-0-0 ¤c6 10.£e2 freeing the f−pawn to advance, Sowray,P−Simacek,P/European Championship, Dresden 2007.
6...b5
There are many others: Perhaps 6...e6 is best, 7.g4 d5! e.g. 8.exd5 ¤xd5 9.¤xd5 £xd5 10.¥g2 £a5+ 11.c3 £c7= . 6...g6 plans a Dragon approach, 7.g4 ¥g7 (7...b5 Ye Jiangchuan−Zhu Chen/Shenyang CHN
In recent times this move has proved to be inferior to 6...e5 and 6...e6. 6...e6 transposes to [B80]. 6...¤bd7 7.f3 g6 is Kasparov,G−Georgiev,K/Sarajevo BIH 2000.
12.f3 (12.a4 ¥e6 13.¤d5 Hossain,E−Browne,W/Stratton Mountain USA 2000) 12...b5 13.¥f2 ¦b8 14.¤d4 b4! At the time this game was played b4! was a big novelty. 15.¤d1?! (15.¤ce2!?) 15...¤xd4 16.¥xd4 d5! Black grabs the initiative in the center.
I think this is best. Kasparov's DVD draws attention to the fact that 10...¤f6!? might not be so bad, 11.¥c4 a) 11.£f3 £b6 (11...¤c6 12.¤xc6 bxc6 13.e5 dxe5 14.¥xe5 0-0 15.¥d3 £a5 16.£e2 ¥e6
White has the better king and structure. 17.0-0 c5 18.¦fe1 ¦fd8 19.b3 ¤d7 20.¥xg7 ¢xg7
c) 11.£e2!? ¤c6 12.¤xc6 bxc6 13.e5 dxe5 14.¥xe5 Black needs a big improvement somewhere around here. I see nothing impressive. If it was that easy Nick would have played it, Rowson,J−De Firmian,N/Selfoss ISL 2003.
Paul USA 2000) 12.0-0 0-0 This looks like a Classical Dragon where Black went nuts. (12...¤xe4? Not one of Shirov's better days! 13.¤xe4 £xd4 14.¤xd6+ exd6 15.£e2+
¥e6 16.¥xe6 0-0 17.¦ad1 £f6 18.¥d5± Ivanchuk,V−Shirov,A/Wijk aan Zee NED 2001)
13.¤de2 £xb2 14.¥b3 £a3 15.f4 ¤c6 Kasparov,G−Polgar,J/Wijk aan Zee NED 2000.
11.¤f5!?
More to the point than other ideas, but in view of the Topalov game it may only lead to a draw.
11.f3 the positional course, is liable for a resurge, 11...¤bc6 12.¥f2 The bishop comes to a more useful square, adding weight to d4. 12...¥e6 (12...¤g6!? a fairly new idea, aiming for the kingside dark squares, 13.£d2 (13.¤d5 ¦b8 14.£d2 e6 15.¤c3 ¥e5! Black increases his dark−square grip, Dominguez Perez,L−Grischuk,A/Melody Amber, Nice (rapid) 2010) 13...£a5 14.¤d5! (14.0-0-0 Svidler,P−Polgar,J, San Luis ARG 2005) 14...£xd2+ 15.¢xd2 and Black was soon in trouble in Karjakin,S−Grischuk,A/Sochi 2007) 13.£d2 £a5 There are others:
hxg5 20.£e3 ¤d7 21.g3 ¥xd4 22.¦xd4 White gets a free shot at Black's K. 22...£c5 23.f4
¤f6 24.£d2 b5 25.¥e2 ¦b8 26.f5 ¥c4 27.b4± De Firmian,N−Ruck,R/Istanbul TUR 2000,
15...0-0 I think the black king is better off hanging out in the middle awaiting further developments, see why in Akopian,S−Kramnik,L/Wijk aan Zee NED 2004) 16.h4 ¦c8 17.hxg5 hxg5 18.0-0-0 ¤c4 19.¥xc4 ¥xd4 20.£xd4 (20.¥b5+ axb5 21.£xd4 ¦c4
22.£d2 ¢d7 23.¤a2 £xd2+ 24.¦xd2² Bologan,V−Xu Jun/Beijing CHN 2000 − White has the better structure and the better minor piece.) 20...¦xc4 21.£a7 £c7 22.¢b1 ¦c5 23.¤d5 ¥xd5 24.exd5 ¢f8= Kasparov,G−Polgar,J/Linares ESP 2001
14.¤b3 ¥xb3 15.cxb3 ¤b4 16.a3 ¤g6 17.¦d1 ¤c6 18.¤d5 £xd2+ 19.¦xd2 Kasparov admits that he was slightly worse at this stage in Leko,P−Kasparov,G/Linares ESP 2000.
14.¤e3 White doesn't exchange on e6 immediately, 14...0-0 (14...£a5+ 15.c3 ¤f3+?! 16.£xf3
¥xc3+ transposes below after White captures on e6) 15.c3 d5 16.fxe6 fxe6 17.¥e2 £e7 Black's position is a bit airy and his only chance for active play is the ...d4 break, Bromberger,S−Berczes,D/Budapest HUN 2004.
14...fxe6 15.¤e3 £a5+
15...0-0 16.¥e2 d5 17.0-0 ¤g6 18.c4 ¤d4 19.cxd5 exd5 20.¥g4 ¤f4 21.¥xf4 ¦xf4 22.£d3± Shirov,A−Gelfand,B/Monaco MNC 2000, with good chances on the light squares.
bxa4 17 ¦xa4 0-0 18 g5 White's king is loose for nothing. 18...a5 19 f5 ¥a6 20 c4 ¦ab8³
Sax,G−Odeev,H/Saint Vincent ITA 2000) 10...b4 11 ¤a4 ¤bd7 12 £f2!? This has to be best at this point. (12 £c4?! This hands the advantage to black without a fight. 12...£xc4 13 ¥xc4 d5! 14 exd5 ¤e5 15 ¥e2 (15 ¤b6!? is probably a better try than 15 Be2, but with queens off white's pawns are vulnerable. 15...¤xc4 16 ¤xc4 ¤xd5 17
9 g5 ¤d7 10 h4 If White's pawn storm doesn't lead to an attack then he should take care of king safety. (10 £e2 £c7 11 ¥e3 b5 12 0-0-0 But Black is ok nevertheless.) 10...£c7 11 ¥e3 b5 12 h5 ¥b7 13 ¦h3 ¤b6 14 £d2 ¤e5 15 £f2 ¤ec4 16 ¥d4 b4 17 ¤d1 White's pieces are a scattered uncoordinated group. 17...d5 18 e5 ¤d7 19 f4 ¥e7 20 ¤e3 a5 21 ¤d2 ¤xd2 22 £xd2 ¤c5∓ Acs,P−Polgar,J/Budapest HUN 2003
Normal, but maybe Black should prefer to accelerate his queenside development: 11...¥b7 12 h4 ¦c8 13 ¢b1 ¤d7 14 ¦g1 ¤ce5 15 £f2 b4 16 ¤a4 ¤xf3?! Winning a pawn,
but getting the worse of matters. 17 £xf3 £c6 18 ¤ac5! ¤xc5 19 ¥xc5 dxc5 20 ¤a5 £c7 21 ¤xb7 £xb7 22 ¥c4± Grischuk,A−Shirov,A/New Delhi IND 2000Black has zero activity.
11...¤d7 12 £f2 ¦b8!? With Nb6 ideas. 11...¤e5 12 g5 ¤fd7 this is fine for Black. Just imagine a Keres Attack with 2 wasted
moves f3 and ¤b3, Shirov,A−Kasparov,G/Linares ESP 2000.
12 £f2
A useful move to control b6. 12 ¢b1 ¤d7 13 £f2 ¥b7 14 g5 ¦c8 15 ¦g1 0-0 16 h4 b4 17 ¤a4 ¤ce5 18 ¤b6 ¤xb6 19
¥xb6 £b8 20 ¥h3 ¤c4 21 ¥a7 £c7 22 h5 White's kingside is on the move while Black has trouble mustering anything, Leko,P−Topalov,V/Batumi GEO 1999
12...¤d7 13 g5
13 h4 ¤ce5 (13...¦b8 Black can get better play with Nb6 and Ne5.) 14 ¢b1 ¥b7 15 ¥d3 ¦c8?! 16 g5 ¤c5?! White piles on the C file then blocks it...does that make sense? 17 ¤xc5 dxc5 18 ¥f1 0-0 19 ¥h3± Ismailova,A−Sergeeva,M, Nakhchivan AZE 2003 White's h5, g6 idea is very fast.
13...¤ce5 14 a3 ¦b8 15 ¦g1 ¤b6?!
and Black was smashed flat in Grischuk,A−Ponomariov,R/Wijk aan Zee 2005.
a new line for White, championed by the Romanian super−GM Nisipeanu. The knight is
headed for g3, and then f5 or h5. 7...¥e6 (7...¤bd7 8.¤g3 £c7 9.¤h5!? and White won convincingly, see Nisipeanu,L−Bologan,V/Asnieres sur Seine FRA 2006., 7...¥e7
was Bobby Fischer's choice 8.¤g3 g6! 9.¥e2 h5 Matlakov,M−Makarov,M/St Petersburg Championship 2007) 8.f4!? ¤bd7 (Black could play 8...g6!?, 8...¤g4 didn't
19
work very well in Kryvoruchko,Y−Kovchan,A/Alushta UKR 2006) 9.f5 ¥c4 10.¤c1 d5!? Nisipeanu,L−Topalov,V/Vitoria Gasteiz 2007.
7...¥e7
7...£c7!? is the alternative, stopping the light−squared bishop from coming to c4, 8.a4 ¥e7 (8...¥e6?! is a well−known mistake, 9.¤g5! ¥e7 10.¤xe6 fxe6 11.g4! McDonald,N−Burrows,M/British League (4NCL) 2011) 9.a5 (9.¥e2 0-0 10.0-0 ¥e6 (10...b6 see Bologan,V−Naiditsch,A/Croatian Team Championship 2009) 11.¤g5 ¥d7 12.a5 h6 13.¤f3 ¥e6 Adams,M−Esen,B/Khanty−Mansiysk Olympiad 2010) 9...0-0 10.¥e2 ¥e6 (10...¤bd7 followed by ...b5 is a good alternative, but White should have a small plus., 10...¤c6 11.¥b6 £b8!? Leko,P−Ivanchuk,V/2nd matchgame, Mukachevo 2009)
11.0-0 ¦c8!? a very rare move, 12.¤d5 thematic, see Leko,P−Topalov,V/Morelia/Linares MEX/ESP 2007.
8.¥c4 0-0 9.0-0 ¥e6
9...¤c6 10.h3 b5 11.¥b3 ¤a5 12.¥g5 the standard move, exchanging the f6−knight to gain control of the d5 square, Shirov,A−Bologan,V/Poikovsky RUS 2006.
9...£c7!? has a certain logic behind it, 10.¥b3 (10.¤d5 ¤xd5 11.¥xd5 ¤d7 12.c4 ¤f6 was nothing for White in Nepomniachtchi,I−Anand,V/Wijk aan Zee 2011) 10...¥e6 11.£e2 ¦c8 12.¦fd1 ¤bd7 13.¥g5 b5 see Akopian,V−Morozevich,A/World Team Championship, Bursa 2010.
10.¥b3
10.¥xe6!? fxe6 11.¤a4!? aiming straight for the weakness on b6, was successful in Ivanchuk,V−Topalov,V, MEX 2007, but 11...¤fd7! is a good reply. (11...¤g4 was Topalov's choice, see Popovic,D−Popovic,P/Zlatibor 2007) 12.c4 ¤c6 13.¦c1 (13.£b3!? ¤a5 Kolev,A−Alsina Leal,D/Villa de Navalmoral Open 2007) 13...¤c5! 14.¤c3 £e8! making good use of the doubled f−pawns to bring the queen into play, Hamdouchi,H−Perez Candelario,M/European Club Cup, Kemer 2007.
Playing overtly for control of the d5−square. 11.£e2 ¤a5 12.¦fd1 ¤xb3 considered to be one of Black's most solid options, (12...£c7
keeping the tension, 13.¥g5 ¦ac8 14.¥xf6 ¥xf6 15.¦ac1 Kamsky,G−Gelfand,B/6th matchgame (rapid), Kazan 2011.) 13.axb3 (13.cxb3!? Carlsen's idea to manoeuvre the f3−knight via c2 and b4 to d5, after which White will gain a solid positional advantage, 13...£b8 probably the most precise, (13...£e8!? 14.¤e1 h6 15.¤c2 £d7
16.¤b4 with the more pleasant position for White in Carlsen−Nunn, Amsterdam 2006, which he later won in fine style, ) 14.¥g5 b5 15.¦d3! h6 16.¥xf6 ¥xf6 17.¦ad1 ¥e7 18.¤d5 ¥xd5 19.¦xd5 a small edge, Leko,P−Shirov,A/Morelia 2008, but Shirov was never too inconvenienced and held with some model play.) 13...¤d7!? rather mysterious, Ivanchuk,V−Bologan,V/Barcelona ESP 2006, (13...£c7
is more normal.)
11...¤d7!
The latest wrinkle, avoiding ¥xf6.
12.¥xe7 £xe7 13.¤d5 £d8
13...¥xd5!? is interesting, Almasi,Z−Berkes,F/Paks HUN 2006.
14.c3
14.£e2 ¤c5 15.¦ad1 ¢h8 common if not totally necessary prophylaxis ahead of a future ...f5, Kononenko,D−Gelfand,B/European Club Cup, Plovdiv 2010.
14.¥xb6 £xb6 15.¥d3 g6 16.¦he1 ¤d7 17.g3 ¢d8 18.¦e4 ¤c5 19.¦b4± Timman,J−De Firmian,N/Malmo 1999.) 13.exd5 ¥f5 14.¥d3 ¥xd3 15.£xd3 ¥g5 16.¥f2 Perunovic,M−Sadvakasov,D/Subotica YUG 2000) 12...¤c5 13.¥e2 ¤xb3 14.cxb3! Recapturing this way makes it harder for Black to attack. 14...b5 15.h4 0-0 16.¥g5 b4 17.¤a4 a5 18.£e3 Tiviakov,S−Gallagher,J/Batumi GEO 1999.) 10...¤xd5 (10...¥xd5 11.exd5 ¤bd7 12.¥e2 g6 13.¤a5 £c7 14.c4 ¢f8 15.0-0 ¢g7 16.b4 ¤e8 17.¦ac1 f5
Black has no attacking chances on the k−side while White is close to opening up the q−side. 18.f4 ¤ef6 19.fxe5 ¤xe5 20.¤b3 ¤e4 21.£d1 ¥f6 22.¤d4± Popovic,P−Tadic,B/Herceg Novi YUG 2001) 11.exd5 ¥f5 12.¥e2 (12.c4 0-0 13.¥e2 a5 14.0-0 a4
9...¤bd7 10.g4 h6 (10...0-0 11.g5 ¤h5 12.0-0-0 £c7 13.¢b1 b5 14.¤d5 ¥xd5 15.exd5 ¤b6 16.¤a5 ¤xd5 17.£xd5 £xa5 18.c4 ¦ab8 19.¥d3 (19.¦g1!? Lahno,K−Palac,M/Istanbul TUR 2003) 19...g6 20.¦he1 ¦fc8 21.cxb5 axb5÷ Calzetta,M−Peptan,C/ New Delhi IND 2000 White has the bishop pair and it's difficult for Black to attack, but a pawn is a pawn.) 11.0-0-0 (11.h4 b5 12.¦g1 b4 13.¤a4 d5 14.g5 d4 15.¥xd4
hxg5 16.hxg5 ¤g4 17.¥e3 ¤xe3 18.£xe3³ Luther,T−Wendt,R/Bayern Open 1999) 11...b5 12.h4 (12.¢b1 £c7?! (12...¤b6!?) 13.h4 b4 14.¤d5 ¥xd5 15.exd5 ¤b6 16.£xb4 ¤fxd5 17.¦xd5 ¤xd5 18.£e4 ¤xe3 19.£xa8+ ¥d8 20.¥d3+− Adams,M−Votava,J/Germany Bundesliga 1999) 12...¤b6 13.£f2 ¤c4 14.¥xc4 bxc4 15.¤c5! The point of Qd2 was to clear the d file for this move. 15...£c7 16.g5 ¤h5 17.¤5a4 ¦b8 18.¤b6 ¤f4 19.gxh6 g6 20.¤bd5 ¥xd5 21.¤xd5 £b7 22.b3 ¤xd5 23.¦xd5 0-0 24.¢b1 £b4 25.¥d2 c3 26.a3 £c4 27.¢a2 £c6 28.¥c1 ¦b5 29.¦hd1± Solak,D−Tzolas,G/Chania GRE 1999
9...¤c6?! This leads to a loss of time. 10.¤d5 ¥xd5 11.exd5 ¤b8 12.¥e2 ¤bd7 13.0-0 0-0 14.c4 ¤e8 15.¤a5 £c7 16.b4 f5 17.¦ac1 ¤ef6 18.¢h1² Khruschiov,A−Yakup,E/Litohoto GRE 1999 White has better chances on the q−side
10...a5!? This move of Danner's was first brought to my attention by Danny King's classic 'Winning with the Najdorf'. 11.¥b5
a) 11.£e1!? intends to meet ...a4 with ¤c5, 11...£c7 (11...£c8 Anand,V−Vallejo Pons,F/Monte Carlo MNC 2004) 12.¥b5! ¤bd7 13.£f2 ¦fc8 14.¢b1 Cheparinov,I−Bu Xiangzhi/M−Tel Masters, Sofia 2008.
b) 11.¢b1 Atakisi,U−Froehlich,P/Budapest HUN 2000 c) 11.a4 ¤c6 12.g4 ¤b4 13.¢b1 ¦c8 14.g5! (14.h4 d5! led to a brutal attacking
display from Black in Erdogdu,M−Morozevich,A/World Team Championship, Bursa 2010) 14...¤h5 Jaracz,P−Wojtaszek,R/Polish Championship, Warsaw 2011.
11...¤a6 the idea here is ...¤c7 (11...¤bd7 12.£f2 ¤e8 13.g4 ¤c7 14.¥a4 ¥c4! 15.¥xd7 £xd7 Now Black has control on the q−side 16.¥b6 ¤b5 17.¤d5 ¥xd5 18.¦xd5 a4 19.¤c5 £c6 20.¤d3
a3 21.b3 ¦a6 22.¥e3 ¤c7∓ Toma,K−Tsai,C/Oropesa del Mar ESP 1999) 12.¢b1 (12.£e2 £b8!? the latest try, the queen unpins the d−pawn, (12...¤c7 13.¤c5
Lastin,A−Dvoirys,S/Moscow RUS 1999 With a nice grip on the q−side.) 13.g4 ¤c7 14.¥a4 keeping hold of b5, Motylev,A−Inarkiev,E/Sochi RUS 2005.) 12...¤c7 13.£e2 (13.¥b6 didn't bother Black too much in Bologan,V−Freitag,M/Izmir TUR 2004, 13.a4 ¤xb5 14.¤xb5 d5 favours Black, Nathani,K−Gardner,R/Edmondton CAN 2000) 13...£c8 14.¤d2 d5 15.exd5 ¤fxd5 16.¤xd5 ¤xd5 17.¤c4 £c7 18.¥f2 ¥f6 19.£e4 ¦fd8 20.¤e3 ¤xe3 21.¥xe3 g6 22.g4 ¦ac8³ Makarov,M−Dvoirys,S/Moscow RUS 1999
10...¤bd7 11.g4 b5 (11...¤b6 looks worse, 12.h4 ¦c8 13.¢b1 Shahade,G−Yudasin,L/New York USA 2001, 11...¦c8!? is Lilux,R−HiarcsX,H/CSS Online Masters 2007) 12.g5 (12.£f2? is an instructive blunder: 12...¥xg4! Barrero Garcia,C−Mena Villar,R, Seville ESP 2004 Why not? It's a pawn) 12...b4!? 13.¤e2 (13.gxf6 bxc3 14.£xc3 ¤xf6 is nothing for White, Anand,V−Grischuk,A/Wijk aan Zee 2011.) 13...¤e8 Kasparov seems to
24
feel this position is fully viable for Black, 14.f4 This sharp move has become established as White's main try.
a) 14.¤g3 a5 15.¢b1 a4 16.¤c1 b3!? critical, (16...£b8!? 17.¤f5 (17.f4 led to some wonderful tactics in Svidler,P−Kasimdzhanov,R/San Luis ARG 2005) 17...¥d8 18.f4!? Lopez Martinez,J−Womacka,M/European Championship, Dresden 2007) 17.¤f5 bxc2+ 18.¢xc2 d5! a very strong novelty! Svidler,P−Morozevich,A/Monte Carlo MNC 2006.
b) 14.¢b1 a5 15.¤bc1 a4 (15...¤b6!? 16.¤g3 d5! might be stronger, Vescovi,G−Di Berardino,D/Sao Paulo BRA 2006) 16.f4!? this weakens e4, 16...exf4 (16...b3?! 17.f5
Bruzon,L−Vera,R/Havana CUB 2003) 17.¥xf4 Svidler,P−Vallejo Pons,F/Monte Carlo MNC 2004.
14...a5 15.f5 a4! this leads to wild play, 16.¤bd4 exd4 17.¤xd4 b3 18.¢b1 bxc2+ 19.¤xc2 ¥b3 20.axb3 axb3 21.¤a3 ¤e5 (21...d5?! this now appears insufficient after 22.£xd5 ¥xa3 with massive complications, 23.£xd7 £a5 24.£b5 £c7 25.£c4 £a5 26.£xb3! (26.£b5 took the repetition in Harikrishna,P−Karjakin,S/Foros UKR 2006)
26...¥xb2!? 27.£xb2 and White won in Harikrishna,P−Volokitin,A/Cap d'Agde FRA 2006.) 22.h4 (22.£g2!? only seems to lead to a draw, Van Oosterom,J−Kukk,R/World Corr. Championship Final 2007.) 22...¦a4! (22...¦a5 led to a fantastic Black win in Karjakin,S−Anand,V/Wijk aan Zee NED 2006, but 23.£b4!) 23.£g2 (23.£c3!? Svidler,P−Van Wely,L/Foros 2008) 23...£a8 24.f6 ¥d8 25.¥d4 ¤c7 26.fxg7 ¢xg7 27.h5 ¤e6 28.¥xe5+! (28.g6? and Black triumphed in Shirov,A−Van Wely,L/Wijk aan Zee NED 2007) 28...dxe5 29.g6 and the game soon fizzled out, Movsesian,S−Hracek,Z/Ostrava 2007.
10...b5 11.g4 b4 12.¤d5 ¥xd5 13.exd5 a5 14.¢b1 £c7!? Black wants to play ...¤d7−b6−c4, Sax,G−Gallagher,J/Mitropa Cup, Baden 1999.
11.g4 ¦c8 12.¢b1
12.g5 ¤h5 13.¤d5 ¥xd5 14.exd5 ¤d7 15.¥h3 a5 (15...g6 and Black was outplayed in instructive fashion, Adams,M−Zhang Zhong/Wijk aan Zee NED 2004) 16.¢b1 a4 17.¤c1 a3 18.b3 ¤f4= Adams,M−Vallejo Pons,F/Bled SLO 2002 Black's heavy piece pile up on the c−file keeps White under control.
12...¤bd7 13.£f2
13.g5 ¤h5 14.f4! a) 14.¦g1 a5 15.a3!? This prevents black from running the pawn to a3 when the
knight on c3 would be undermined. 15...¤b6 16.f4!? ¤xf4 17.¥xf4 exf4 18.£xf4 ¤c4 19.¦g3 g6 20.¤d4 ¥f8 21.¤db5 £b6 22.¥xc4 ¦xc4 23.¤xd6± Svidler,P−Kempinski,R/Moscow RUS 2003 One case where the knights dominate the bishops.
b) 14.¤d5 ¥xd5 15.exd5 ¤b6 (15...g6 16.¦g1 ¥f8 17.¦g4 ¦e8?! Feels like a waste of time. 18.¦c4 £b8 19.¤a5 ¤f4 20.h4 b6 21.¤c6 £b7 22.¥xf4 exf4 23.h5 ¤e5 24.¦xf4± Lutz,C−Ftacnik,L/Cologne GER 2003 24...¤xc6 25.dxc6 £xc6 26.¥c4 With a light square attack.) 16.¦g1 a5 17.a3 a4 18.¤c5! dxc5 19.d6 ¥xd6 20.£xd6 ¤f4 21.¥xf4 exf4 22.¥b5± Shirov,A−Gelfand,B/New Delhi IND 2000
13.h4?! This pawn storm amounts to a huge waste of time. 13...a5 14.¤b5?! (14.a4!?
Attempting to clog the queenside makes the most sense.) 14...£c6 15.h5? Wasting more time. 15...a4 16.¤a1 This is a very ugly place for a knight. 16...d5! 17.g5 d4 18.¥xd4 exd4 19.¤xd4 £b6 20.¤xe6 fxe6 21.¥e2 ¦c7 22.gxf6 ¥xf6-+ Kriventsov,S−Shahade,J/Seattle USA 2003 Black's dark square play decides the issue.
15...¦cb8 16.¤d5 (16.f4 b4 17.¤d5 ¥xd5 18.¦xd5 ¤b6 was alright for Black in Bacrot−Gelfand game 4 Albert Fra 2002) 16...¥xd5 17.exd5 a5 18.¥d3 a4 19.¤c1 a3 20.c3 axb2 21.£xb2 White did nothing to slow Black down. 21...g6 22.¥e4 ¦a4 23.¤d3 ¤g3 24.¤b4 ¤c5 25.¥xc5 £xc5 26.¦he1 ¥f8³ Dworakowska,J−Gallagher,J/Calcutta IND 2001.
8...h5!? stops White from playing his natural kingside pawn advance g4−5: 9.£d2 (9.¤d5!
might be more accurate, 9...¥xd5 (9...¤xd5 10.exd5 ¥f5 11.¥d3 ¥xd3 12.£xd3 saves a tempo) 10.exd5 ¤bd7 11.£d2 (11.c4 ¥e7 Vescovi,G−Leitao,R/Sao Paulo BRA 2000)
11...£c7 (11...g6 12.0-0-0!? Anand,V−Topalov,V/Wijk aan Zee 2008) 12.c4 b6 13.¥e2 g6 14.0-0 ¥g7 15.¦ac1 a5 with a dark−squared bind, Nijboer,F−Navara,D/Wijk aan Zee 2011.) 9...¤bd7 10.¥e2
b) 10.0-0-0 ¥e7 is seen in the other 6...e5 7 ¤b3 Roadmap 10...¥e7 11.¤d5 ¤xd5 (11...¥xd5 12.exd5 £c7 may be superior, as in Leko,P−Topalov,V,
Monte Carlo MNC 2006) 12.exd5 ¥f5 13.0-0 (13.¤a5 £c7 14.c4 David,A−Dinstuhl,V/Castrop−Rauxel GER 2000) 13...£c7 (13...a5 14.f4! The bishop on f5 becomes vulnerable in these situations, Galliamova,A−Hunt,H/Istanbul TUR 2000.) 14.c4 b6 (14...a5 this doesn't help Black one bit, 15.f4! the usual business. 15...g6 16.fxe5
White prepares to castle long. 9.g4!? attempts to embarrass the knight, 9...¤b6! this has become the main move since
Kasparov played it in 2004, a) 9...b5 10.g5 b4 11.¤e2 (11.¤d5 ¤xd5 12.exd5 ¥f5 13.¥d3 ¥xd3 14.£xd3 ¥e7
15.h4 0-0 16.0-0-0 a5 17.¤d2 f5 (17...a4 18.¢b1 f5 Leko−Kasparov Bled OL 2002. The Kasparov sign of approval means this deserves attention.) 18.gxf6 ¤xf6 19.h5
a1) 12...a5 13.¤g3 ¤xg3 (13...¤f4!? is a new pawn sac, seen in Shchekachev,A−Kosten,A/Cannes FRA 2004) 14.hxg3 a4 15.¤c1 £a5 16.f4 g6 17.¤d3 ¥g7 18.a3 bxa3 19.£xa5 ¦xa5 Bacrot−Gelfand Albert Fr. 2002 Black has good counterplay.
a2) 12...h6!? 13.gxh6 g6 14.0-0-0 a5 15.¢b1 ¤hf6 16.¤ed4?! Too optimistic. Black has put together a solid position. White should play for f4. 16...exd4 17.¤xd4 £c7 18.¤xe6 fxe6 19.¥h3 ¢f7∓ Spassov−Ponomariov Bled OL 2002
13.¤g3 ¤f4 14.h4 h6 15.¥xf4 exf4 16.¤h5 ¥xb3 17.axb3 g6 18.¤xf4 hxg5 19.¤d5 ¤e5 (19...¦xh4 20.¦xh4 gxh4 21.0-0-0 ¤f6 22.¥c4 ¤xd5 23.£xd5 With a strong attack in the bishop of opposite middlegame. 23...¥g5+ 24.¢b1 ¦a7 25.e5 ¢f8 26.e6 ¥f6 27.exf7+−
b) 9...h6 10.£d2 b5 11.0-0-0 ¤b6 12.£f2 ¤fd7 13.¢b1 ¥e7 14.h4 £c7 15.¤d5 ¥xd5 16.exd5 ¦b8 17.f4 ¤f6 18.£g2 h5 19.gxh5 ¤xh5 20.fxe5 dxe5 21.¤a5± Kobalija,M−Gadjily,R/Batumi GEO 1999 − Black has no chances for king safety.
10.g5 taking the sting out of Black's ...d5 push makes good sense, (10.£d2 d5 11.0-0-0 d4
12.¤xd4 exd4 13.¥xd4 ¥e7 14.£e3 ¤bd7 15.h3 White has 2 pawns for the piece and serious attacking chances, Topalov,V−Ivanchuk,V/Monaco MNC 2000) 10...¤h5 11.£d2 ¥e7 12.£f2 (12.0-0-0 is more popular, see Baramidze,D−Naiditsch,A/Warsaw POL 2005) 12...¤c4 Black is now forced to play this, 13.¥xc4 ¥xc4 14.¦g1 (14.h4 is the other way to defend the pawn: 14...0-0 15.¤a4 f5 16.¤b6 see Leko,P−Kasparov,G/Linares ESP 2004.) 14...0-0 15.0-0-0 ¦c8 16.¤d5 with thematic play in which Black's chances were not worse, Adams,M−Naiditsch,A/Dortmund GER 2005.
9...b5
Normal, although Black sometimes try to hold−up White's kingside play by 9...h5 and this transposes to 8...h5.
This leads to the win of a pawn, but at a cost in development, 10.g4 ¤b6 (10...b4 11.¤d5 ¥xd5 12.exd5 ¤b6 13.0-0-0!? Morozevich,A−Anand,V/Mainz (rapid)
2008) 11.g5 ¤fd7 12.¤d5 is more to Black's liking, 12...¦c8! an important move, with a tactical point, 13.¤xb6 (13.0-0-0 ¥xd5! 14.exd5 ¤c4 15.£e1 (15.¥xc4? bxc4
10.0-0-0!? is becoming trendy: 10...¤b6 a) 10...¥e7 is the modern preference, see Leko,P−Anand,V/Morelia 2008 b) 10...h5?! 11.¤d5 (11.¢b1 ¥e7 12.h3 h4 13.¥d3 £c7! Akopian,V−Gelfand,B/Yerevan
11...¥xd5 12.exd5 g6 13.¢b1 ¤b6 14.£c3! Black has some problems, Kramnik,V−Topalov,V/Linares ESP 2004.
11.£f2 ¤c4 12.¥xc4 bxc4 13.¤a5! the clever move of Bologan's that brought the variation back to life, 13...£d7!? the latest try, (13...¤d7 Bologan,V−Gelfand,B/Merida ESP 2005, 13...¦c8 14.¥b6 £d7 15.g3 g6 16.¦d2 ¥h6 17.f4 Anand,V−Kasimdzhanov,R/San Luis ARG 2005, when 17...0-0 looks OK.) 14.¦d2!? ¥e7 15.¦hd1 Anand,V−Gelfand,B/Wijk aan Zee NED 2006, when 15...0-0 is best.
10...b4
10...bxa4?! 11.¦xa4 leaves the a−pawn exposed, Nijboer,F−Vink,N/Wijk aan Zee NED 2001.
This move of Kasparov's, where the dark−squared bishop will gain a tempo on the white queen, and control a big diagonal, has completely replaced the older 15...¥e7 16.¦a4 ¦b8 17.¤c1 ¥d8 18.b3 e4 19.¤a2 exf3 20.gxf3 ¤d7 21.£e3+ ¢f8 22.¢d1 ¤e5 23.¦e1 g5÷ Nijboer,F−Van Blitterswijk,S/Leeuwarden NED 2000.
16.¦a4 ¦b8 17.¤c1
The strongest move, the knight moves from a passive square to put further pressure on the b4−pawn. However, there is a cost, the white king is still in the centre of the board.
After 17.£d3 many games have been drawn by repetition: 17...¦a8 (but Black can also try 17...¥h6!? see the note to Karjakin,S−Naiditsch,A) 18.£d2 ¦b8 etc.
This is the point, the black bishop is destined for the c1-h6 diagonal, not the a1-h8 one.
18.¤a2
32
18.¤d3 reduces the queen's vista, but the knight reaches a more central square, 18...¥h6 19.£xb4 £c7 20.£a3 0-0 21.¤f2 ¥c1 22.¤d3 Polgar,J−Shirov,A/Linares ESP 2001, and now 22...¥h6 offers to repeat.
18...¥h6 19.£d3
19.£xb4 is seen in Karjakin,S−Naiditsch,A/Pamplona ESP 2004.
19...0-0
and this is analysed in Murdzia,P−Kosten,A/Bundesliga 2004.
This move is a good and safe way to get off the beaten track.
6...e5
This stays in the Najdorf, but there is also 6...e6 transposing into a Scheveningen−type position, 7.¥g2 ¥e7 8.0-0 0-0 9.¤ce2 £c7 10.b3 e5! Carlsen,M−Anand,V/Wijk aan Zee 2011.
and 6...¥d7!? 7.¥g2 ¤c6 8.0-0 e6 is Nielsen,M−De Firmian,N/Copenhagen DEN 2004 in (B80).
This is becoming more popular, and looks at playing on the queenside, 7.¤de2 here the knight aims for f5 via g3 after a later h3 and g4, 7...¤bd7 (7...b5 an
ambitious move, 8.¥g2 (8.¤d5 ¤bd7 9.¤ec3 ¥b7 10.¥g2 ¤xd5! leaves Black very close to equality, Alekseev,E−Karjakin,S/Russian Team Championship, Dagomys 2008)
a) 8.a4 b6 9.¥g2 ¥b7 10.0-0 h6 11.¤d5 (11.h3 with the idea of g4 and ¤g3 is another try) 11...¤xd5 12.exd5 ¥e7 13.c4 0-0 14.a5 bxa5 15.¥d2 Burnett,R−Breier,A/Groningen NED 1999
b) 8.¥g5!? Fighting for d5 makes sense. 8...¥e7 (8...b5 9.0-0 ¥b7 10.a4!? Beach,R−Palliser,R/Yorkshire v. Greater Manchester, Leeds
2009) 9.h3 b5 10.g4! the only real way to challenge Black, (10.¥e3 ¥b7 11.g4 b4 12.¤d5 ¤xd5 13.exd5 0-0 14.£d2 (14.¤g3!?) 14...a5 15.a3?! White weakens his q−side for nothing, Blanco,C−Ashley,M/Philadelphia USA 2001.) 10...b4 11.¤d5 ¤xd5 12.exd5 a5! Alekseev,E−Dominguez Perez,L/Biel 2008.
7...¤bd7
7...¥e7 is the move of choice these days, 8.¥g2 b5!? a) 8...¤bd7 9.a4 b6 10.0-0 £c7?! is Malakhov,V−Vallejo Pons,F/Khanty Mansyisk
RUS 2005 (10...¥b7 11.¦e1 ¦c8 transposes to 8 a4)
b) 8...¥e6 9.0-0 0-0 10.a4 ¤bd7 is less ambitious, but more solid, see Malakhov,V−Smirnov,P/Moscow RUS 2006.
9.a4 b4 10.¤d5 ¤xd5 11.£xd5 ¦a7 12.¥e3 ¥e6 13.£d2 ¦b7 and White doesn't have anything especially dangerous, Mamedov,R−Le Quang Liem/Aeroflot Open, Moscow 2011.
12.b4 ¤e6 13.¤d5 ¦c8 14.c4 Popov,I−Vachier Lagrave,M/World Junior Ch., Puerto Madryn 2009) 11...¦c8 (11...0-0 12.¤d2 ¤c5 13.¤f1 b5 14.¥g5! (14.axb5 is too simple for my liking, Rasmussen,A−Nielsen,P/Danish Championship, Silkeborg
35
2008) 14...b4!? 15.¥xf6! starting a positional squeeze, Leko,P−Nielsen,P/Monte Carlo MNC 2006.) 12.¤d2 ¦c5! an important move to control d5, and prepare ...£a8, Cornette,M−Kosten,A/Montpellier 2005.
9...¥b7 is obvious, but may be premature: 10.¤d5 ¤xd5 11.exd5 ¥e7 12.¥d2! forcing Black's reply because of the nasty threat of ¤a5−c6, 12...a5 13.a4 b4 14.c3 bxc3 15.¥xc3 Nepeina−Leconte,M−Kosten,A, Naujac sur Mer 2000. Suddenly £d2 is coming and the a−pawn is looking exposed.
10.a4 b4 11.¤a2 a5 12.c3 bxc3 13.¤xc3
and the knight goes to b5 next, Adams,M−Topalov,V/Sofia BUL 2005.
8.¥g5!? When White plays this, Black must recognize that the battle will revolve around the d5 point, 8...¥e6
a) 8...0-0 9.¥xf6 White plays for control of d5, 9...¥xf6 10.£d3 ¥e6 11.¦d1 (11.0-0-0
Jansa,V−Dvorak,T/Czech Rep CZE 2003 11...£b6) 11...¥e7 12.¤d5 ¥xd5 13.£xd5 £c7 this line just seems to be pretty harmless these days, see Kokarev,D−Areshchenko,A/Russian Team Championship 2011.
b) 8...¤bd7!? 9.a4 h6!? 10.¥h4 b6 11.¤d2! bringing the knight to e3 with advantage, Nisipeanu,L−Nakamura,H/Kings Tournament, Medias 2011.
9.¥xf6 (9.£d2 ¤bd7 10.f4 ¦c8 11.f5 ¥c4 12.¥xc4 ¦xc4 13.£d3 £c7 14.0-0-0 b5 (14...¦xc3!? deserves a real long look) 15.¤d2 ¦c6 16.¥xf6 ¤xf6 17.¤d5 ¤xd5 18.exd5 White's knight on e4 vs the bishop on e7 is a mismatch. 18...¦b6 19.¢b1 0-0 20.¤e4± De Firmian,N−Roeder,M/Las Palmas ESP 1999.) 9...¥xf6 10.£d3 ¤c6 (10...¥g5!? Carlsen,M−Dominguez Perez,L/FIDE World Cup, Khanty−Mansiysk 2007) 11.0-0-0 £b6!? rare, but on the current evidence quite promising, (11...¥e7
Nadj Hedjesi,B−Quezada,Y/Kochin IND 2004) 12.£xd6 ¥e7 see Smeets,J−Dominguez Perez,L/Wijk aan Zee 2009.
9.¢h1 White's plans to play f4 without having to worry about a check on the g1-a7 diagonal, but first he wants to see what Black will play 9...b6 Gelfand's move.
a) 9...¥d7!? this is not a bad alternative to the beaten track. Of course, this was part of Kasparov's anti−machine routine, 10.¥e3 ¥c6 11.¥f3 ¤bd7 12.a4 b6 Black is already better, DEEP JUNIOR−Kasparov,G/New York USA 2003.
b) 9...¤c6 10.f3 b5!? (10...¥e6 is standard, planning ...d5 11.¤d5 a5 12.¥e3! a4 13.¤c1
¥xd5!? 14.exd5 ¤d4 Adams,M−Karjakin,S/Wijk aan Zee NED 2006.) 11.¥e3 ¤a5 aiming for c4, 12.¤xa5 £xa5 13.£d2 £c7 (13...¢h8? 14.b4! Azarov,S−Wojtaszek,R/Czech League 2010) 14.a4 b4 Morozevich,A−Kasimdzhanov,R/San Luis ARG 2005.
39
10.a4 (10.f3 ¥b7 11.¥e3 ¤bd7 12.a4 ¦c8 Kulaots,K−Carlsen,M/Gausdal NOR 2005, 10.f4!? is aggressive, 10...¥b7 11.¥f3 ¤bd7 12.a4 but White was crushed in thematic fashion in Dvoirys,S−Wang Yue/Cappelle la Grande FRA 2007) 10...¥b7 11.f3 ¤c6 12.¤d5 ¤xd5 13.exd5 ¤b4 14.c4 a5 15.¥d2 ¤a6 16.¥c3 ¥g5 17.¥d3 ¥c8 18.£c2 g6³ Polgar,J−Topalov,V/Dos Hermanas 1999.
10.¤d5 ¤bd7 11.£d3 ¥xd5 12.exd5 ¦c8 recommended in 'The Sharpest Sicilian' a) 12...¤c5 13.£d2 ¤fe4 14.£b4 a5!? (14...b6) 15.£b5 £c7 16.¦fd1 b6 17.f3!
(17.£c4 f5 18.¥d3 £d8 19.¤xc5 ¤xc5 20.a3 ¦c8= Svidler,P−Polgar,J/Dos Hermanas 1999.) 17...¤f6 18.£c4 £b7?! 19.¤xc5 bxc5 20.£b3 £c7 21.¥b5 and White broke open the queenside and won in fine style, Areshchenko,A−Efimenko,Z/Rivne UKR 2005.
b) 12...¤e8!? 13.£d2 f5 14.f4 ¤ef6 led to a model win for Black in Sasvari,T−Van Oosterom,J/World Corr. Championship Final 2007.
13.c4 a5 14.¦ad1 (14.¢h1!? is slightly mysterious, Short,N−Cheparinov,I/Wijk aan Zee B 2008) 14...b6 15.¤d2 ¤c5 16.£c2 ¤fd7 17.f3 ¥g5 18.¥f2 f5 19.¢h1 £f6 20.¤b1 £h6 21.¤c3 ¦ce8 22.a3 e4 23.b4² Shirov,A−Polgar,J/ Linares ESP 2001 White's knight on c3 becomes a real pain with ¤b5 to c7 looming.
This is Karpov's plan, he would continue with ¦fd1, a5, and then bring the b3−knight to b4
to control d5.
11...¦c8
11...¤c5!? was Tony's suggestion in 'Easy Guide to the Najdorf', see Kozakov,M−Guidarelli,L/Calvi FRA 2004.
40
11...¤b6!? has been quite topical of late, 12.a5 ¤c4 13.¥xc4 ¥xc4 14.¦fd1 ¦c8 15.¤c1 d5! Smeets,J−Giri,A/German Bundesliga 2010.
12.a5 £c7
Black's main move, but he has some decent alternatives: 12...¦e8 13.¦fc1 (13.¦fd1 h6 14.¥f3 £c7 15.¤c1 ¥f8 16.h3 b5 17.¤d3 d5! This sacrifice prevents
White's ¤b4 to d5 bind. 18.exd5 ¥f5 19.¤e1 ¥d6 Black's pieces are very active. 20.¤a2
e4 21.¥e2 ¦e5 22.c4 ¤c5³ Black will restore material equality with the better game. Marjanovic−Fedorowicz Paris 1986.) 13...h6 14.f3 ¥f8 15.¤d5 ¤xd5 16.exd5 ¥f5 17.c4 ¥h7 18.¦e1 f5 19.f4 exf4 20.¥xf4 g5 21.¥e3 ¤e5 22.¦ac1 f4 23.¥d4² Asrian,K−Naumann,A/Yerevan ARM 1999.
12...h6
13.¦fc1
Karpov's original idea, now thought to be harmless. 13.¦fd1 is more dangerous 13...¦fd8 14.£e1 h6!? 15.h3 ¤c5 following the Gallagher
recipe, Adams,M−Negi,P/Spanish Team Championship 2009.
13...¦fd8
13...¤c5 is the plan pioneered by Joe Gallagher, 14.¤xc5 dxc5 15.¤d5 ¥xd5 16.exd5 e4!? planning ...¥d6 with good chances, Asrian,K−Andriasian,Z/Yerevan ARM 2007.
6...g6 7 ¥e2 ¥g7 8 0-0 0-0 9 ¢h1 ¤bd7 resembles a Dragon, Lutz,C−Svidler,P/Frankfurt GER 1999.
7 ¤f3 ¤bd7 8 a4
The most accurate move, clamping−down on Black's queenside expansion. 8 g4!? is really surprising, 8...¤xg4 9 ¥c4 ¤b6 10 ¥b3 with sharp play, Volokitin,A−
Harikrishna,P/Cap d'Agde FRA 2006.
8...¥e7 9 ¥d3
9 ¥c4!? is an active alternative, 9...£a5!? 10 ¥d2!? (10 0-0?? £c5+ is the point) 10...exf4 11 £e2 0-0 (I don't see anything wrong with this sensible choice, but 11...¤e5!? 12 ¥b3
£c7 is preferred in 'The Sharpest Sicilian'.) 12 ¤d5!? Isik,E−Yilmaz,M/Turkish Championship, Safranbolu 2009.
10...¤c5 11 ¢h1 exf4 transposes, whilst avoiding the pawn sac line below. 10...£c7 11 ¢h1 exf4 12 ¥xf4 ¤e5 Black's control of e5 almost always gives good play.
7.£e2 has been fairly topical at grandmaster level, but Black should be OK.
7...e6
7...£a5!? 8.£d2 e6 9.0-0-0 b5 10.¥b3 (10.¥d5 b4!) 10...¥b7 11.¦he1 7...£b6 8.¥b3 (it's surprising that the Poisoned Pawn−style 8.£d2!? hasn't been seen more
often, 8...£xb2 9.¦b1 £a3 10.0-0 e6 11.¥xe6!? with Tal−like play in Wang Yue−Zhou Jianchao/Danzhou 2011.) 8...e6 9.£d2 ¥e7 (9...¤c5!? is risky, 10.¥xf6! gxf6 11.0-0-0 ¥d7
12.f4 Hunt,A−Cheparinov,I/European Club Cup, Plovdiv 2010) 10.0-0-0 ¤c5 11.f3
7.¥d3 The Najdorf is one opening where something innocuous meets with a terrible fate. 7...¥e7 8.f4 0-0 9.£f3 ¤bd7 10.0-0-0 £c7 11.£h3 ¤c5 12.g4 b5 13.a3 ¥b7 14.£f3 ¦ab8 15.¤de2 ¥a8 16.¥xf6 ¥xf6 17.g5 ¥xc3 18.¤xc3 b4 19.axb4 ¦xb4∓ With good action on the b and c files, Ssegirinya,J−Nguyen Anh Dung/Shenyang CHN 1999.
Probably Black's most popular alternative line. The f6−knight is supported, e5 is hindered
and Black is ready to advance on the queenside. Other major alternatives: 7...¤c6!? (the 'Rauzerdorf'?) is a decent move that avoids the mainline theory. 8.e5
Recommended by Luther in 'Experts vs the Sicilian'. a) 8.£d2 h6 9.¥xf6 £xf6 10.¤f3 Murey,J−Saravanan,V/London ENG 1999, and
now 10...g5! Fighting for the dark squares is best. b) 8.¤xc6 bxc6 9.e5 is another sharp line, 9...h6 10.¥h4 (10.¥xf6!? gxf6 11.exd6 £xd6
12.£xd6 ¥xd6 13.g3 f5 14.¥g2 ¢d7 15.0-0-0 ¢c7 was fine for Black in Gormally,D−Kosten,A, Birmingham ENG 2000) 10...g5 A drastic unpinning! 11.fxg5 (11.¥f2!? a rare move, but by no means innocuous, Gashimov,V−Dominguez Perez,L/42nd Capablanca Memorial, Havana 2007) 11...¤d5 12.¤e4 £b6! 13.¥d3 Best. (13.c4?! is dubious, Bauer,P−Stangl,M/BL8990 1990) 13...hxg5 (13...£xb2 is one untested suggestion, but 14.0-0 gives me the creeps... Black's development lags) 14.¥xg5 (14.¥g3 ¤f4! (14...dxe5 15.¥xe5 ¦h4?! is Lendwai,R−Ermenkov,E/Miskolc 1990)
15.¥xf4 gxf4 16.¤xd6+ ¥xd6 17.exd6 e5!) 14...£xb2! 15.c4!? (15.¤f6+ is normal, 15...¤xf6 16.¥xf6 £c3+ 17.¢f1 (17.¢e2 ¦g8 QUARK−DIEP/Paderborn GER 2004)
17...¦h6 Van der Wiel,J−Baklan,V/Groningen Open 2009.) 15...¥e7! this is
50
probably best, (15...£xg2?! a theoretical move, but it might be a mistake, see Korneev,O−Sutovsky,E/Montreal CAN 2006., 15...£xe5!? 16.cxd5 ¥g7 Pushkarev,D−Loskutov,O/Novokuznetsk 2008.) 16.¥xe7 ¤e3 17.£c1!? ¤xg2+ 18.¢d1 ¤e3+ 19.£xe3! (19.¢e1 ¤g2+ will force a draw) 19...£xa1+ 20.¢d2 £xh1! 21.¥xd6! Smeets,J−Dominguez Perez,L/Wijk aan Zee 2010.
c) 8.£d3!? ¥d7 (8...h6 9.¥h4 g5! 10.fxg5 ¤g4 is Naiditsch,A−Vachier−Lagrave,M/French League 2009, when White should play 11.¤xc6! bxc6 12.0-0-0) 9.0-0-0 h6 (9...¥e7 is seen in Forster,R−Sadler,M/Calicut 1993 [B62].) 10.¥h4 g5! 11.fxg5 ¤g4 transposes to the Vachier−Lagrave game.
a) In his book 'The Easy Guide to the Najdorf' Tony preferred the suggestion of
Behl's: 9...¤xd4!? 10.£xd4 (10.exf6? is a mistake, but it is worth knowing the refutation: 10...¤f5! 11.fxg7 £xh4+ 12.g3 ¤xg3 13.gxh8£ ¤e4+ 14.¢e2 £f2+ 15.¢d3 ¤c5+
16.¢c4 b5+ 17.¤xb5 axb5+ 18.¢c3 b4+ 19.¢c4 d5+ 20.¢xb4 ¦a4+ 21.¢b5 ¥d7+ with mate in a few moves.) 10...dxe5 11.£xd8+ ¢xd8 12.fxe5 g5 13.¥g3 ¤d7 14.0-0-0 ¥g7 but now Luther suggests 15.¥e2! aiming for h5, see Luther,T−Senff,M/Cappelle la Grande 2001.
b) 9...dxe5!? This may be the strongest move here. 10.¤xc6 £xd1+ 11.¦xd1 bxc6 12.fxe5 ¤d7! 13.¤e4 ¥b7 with pressure on e5. 14.¥g3 c5 Black must open up his good bishop, and rightly doesn't fear an invasion on d6, Le Roux,J−Vachier Lagrave,M/French Championship, Nimes 2009.
12.exd6 a) 12.e6!? ¥xe6 13.¤xc6 bxc6 14.£d4 hitting the h8−rook and defending the
bishop, is critical, but this looks like a forced draw see the note to Guseinov,G−Soylu,S.
b) 12.¤xc6 bxc6 13.exd6 allows 13...hxg5 (13...¥xd6 brings us back to the mainline)
14.¥g3 ¥xd6 15.£f3 £e7+ 16.¥e2 ¥xg3+ 17.£xg3 £b4+ 18.c3 £h4!? this manoeuvre keeps White's advantage under control, Hebden,M−Gormally,D/Port Erin IOM 2001.
12...¥xd6 13.¤xc6 bxc6 14.£d4 £e7+ 15.¥e2 ¥e5 I think Black is alright here, see the analysis of Dworakowska,J−Areshchenko,A/Caleta ENG 2005.
7...b5!? Somewhere along the line the Polugaevsky variation fell out of favor. If anything it's over−sharp. 8.e5! White feels the need to punish Black for the premature ...b5. (8.¥d3?! is too deliberate, 8...£c7 9.¤ce2?! This shouldn't lead to anything. 9...¥e7
10.£d2 Galiana,J−Angel Acosta,J/Cala Galdana ESP 1999, when after 10...¤bd7!?
Black is fine) 8...dxe5 9.fxe5 £c7 10.exf6 (10.£e2 ¤fd7 11.0-0-0 ¥b7 12.£g4 £b6 13.¥e2
20.¢h1 f6 21.£g4 ¦e7 22.a4!± Stanford,M−North,R/Vancouver BC CAN 2001.) 16.£e3 ¥b7 17.a4 £b4!? 18.c4 ¥xe4 19.£xe4 £c5+ 20.¢h1 b4 is unclear.
7...£c7 stops ¥c4, 8.£f3 a) 8.¥d3!? is quite tricky, Goh Wei Ming−Galyas,M/1st Saturday, Budapest 2007 b) 8.¥xf6 gxf6 9.£d2 plays for a small, Rauzer−style edge, 9...¤c6 10.0-0-0 ¥d7
11.¢b1 0-0-0 (11...¥e7 may actually be Black's best move order, see Motylev,A−Zhao Jun/Chinese Team Championship 2010) 12.¥c4 ¦g8!? Andriasian,Z−Vachier Lagrave,M/Aeroflot Open, Moscow 2010
52
8...b5 (8...¤bd7 and, 8...¥e7 transpose elsewhere) 9.¥xf6 (9.¥d3 is a bit lame, 9...b4 10.¤ce2
¤bd7 11.0-0-0 ¥e7 and Black was doing well in Berg,E−Vera,R/Calvia ESP 2005, but, 9.0-0-0 is White's most dangerous possibility, see the notes to the Berg game.) 9...gxf6 10.e5 (10.a3 ¤c6! Robson,R−Vachier Lagrave,M/World Junior Ch., Puerto Madryn 2009, 10.0-0-0 b4 11.¤ce2 h5! 12.¤g3 h4 13.¤h5 ¤d7 14.g4 ¥b7 Black appears to be fine, Shirov,A−Papaioannou,I/European Team Ch., Novi Sad 2009) 10...d5 11.exf6 b4 12.¤xd5 exd5 13.0-0-0 ¤d7 (13...¥b7 is also good, see the notes to this game) 14.¥b5!? axb5 15.¦he1+ with a sharp attack, Berelovich,A−Istratescu,A/Bucharest 1998.
7...¥d7!? 8.£e2 ¤c6 9.0-0-0 ¤xd4 10.¦xd4 £b6 is Pruijssers,R−Adly,A/Groningen NED 2005.
7...h6!? risks chasing the bishop to a better diagonal, but will most probably transpose, 8.¥h4 £b6 (8...¥e7 9.£f3 £c7 10.0-0-0 ¤bd7 11.¥d3 (11.¥f2!?, or 11.¥e2 ) 11...g5 is a Browne System [B99] see Stripunsky−Wojtkiewicz/Chicago 2000) 9.£d2 £xb2 10.¦b1 £a3 11.e5 transposes to the Poisoned Pawn, see Bromberger,S−Areshchenko,A/German Bundesliga 2010.
8.£f3
8.£e2!? is a dangerous alternative, 8...£c7 9.0-0-0 b5 10.a3 stopping ...b4 is best, (10.g4
Spraggett,K−Kuczynski,R/Cappelle la Grande FRA 2005) 10...¥e7 11.g4 ¥b7! this is correct (11...¦b8?! falling for an extremely well disguised trap, 12.¥g2 b4? 13.axb4 ¦xb4 14.e5! dxe5 15.¤c6 ¥b7 (15...¦b6? 16.¤xe7 see Spraggett,K−Czakon,J/San Sebastian Open 2007.) 16.¤xb4 ¥xb4 17.fxe5! Ivanchuk,V−Van Wely,L/Wijk aan Zee 2010.) 12.¥h4 (12.¥g2 h6 13.¥h4 is a safe approach with quite reasonable chances for an edge) 12...¤b6 13.g5 ¤fd7 14.f5 e5 15.¤f3!? Shirov,A−Berg,E/Khanty−Mansiysk Olympiad 2010.
8.¥c4!? also, 8...£b6! Gelfand's choice. (8...b5!? 9.¥xe6! fxe6 10.¤xe6 with a strong attack, Sulskis,S−Van der Stricht,G/Gothenburg SWE 2005.) 9.¥b3! (9.¥xf6 ¤xf6 10.£d3!?
suggested by Scherbakov, 10...£xb2 11.0-0 ¤d7 Gashimov,V−Van Wely,L/French League 2010.) 9...¥e7 10.f5 ¤c5 11.£f3!? Gashimov,V−Volokitin,A/Poikovsky 2008.
8...£c7
8...h6 9.¥h4 (9.¥xf6!? is interesting, see Safarli,E−Sjugirov,S/Kirishi RUS 2006) 9...e5!? a big (and relatively new) idea. Black is looking to establish a knight on e5, 10.¤f5 exf4 11.¥xf6 (11.0-0-0 g5 12.¥f2 ¤e5 White doesn't have sufficient compensation for the pawn, Mueller,M−Kasimdzhanov,R/Mainz GER 2006, 11.£xf4 g5 12.¤xd6+ ¥xd6
13.£xd6 gxh4 14.e5 Black has enough activity to compensate for his slightly damaged pawn structure) 11...¤xf6 12.0-0-0 this is examined in Berg,E−Campos Moreno,J/Calvia ESP 2005.
9.g4!? is interesting, 9...b5 10.¥xf6 ¤xf6 11.g5 ¤d7 12.0-0-0 ¥b7 (12...b4!? must be critical,
13.¤d5! see Radjabov,T−Volokitin,A/Biel SUI 2006, 12...¤c5?! 13.a3! ¦b8 14.b4 ¤d7
15.¤d5! a standard sacrifice, but especially strong here, Nakamura,H−Van Wely,L/Wijk aan Zee 2010) 13.¥h3!? (13.f5) 13...¦c8 14.¦he1! with dangerous threats, Volokitin,A−Petrosian,T/European Championship, Dresden 2007.
An important junction where White has lots of tempting possibilities: 10.a3 is slow, 10...¥b7 (10...¦b8 and ...b4 is also good) 11.g4 ¥e7 12.¥xf6 ¤xf6 13.g5 ¤d7
14.¥h3 ¤c5 Leko,P−Shirov,A/Monaco MNC 2001. 10.e5!? is just an exciting way to make a draw, 10...¥b7 11.£h3 dxe5 12.¤xe6 fxe6
13.£xe6+ ¥e7 14.¥xb5 (14.¥xf6 gxf6 15.¥xb5 axb5 16.¤xb5 £c6 17.¤d6+ Gharamian,T−Bromberger,S/German Bundesliga 2011) 14...axb5 15.¤xb5 £c6 16.¤d6+ ¢d8 17.fxe5 see Nisipeanu,L−Shirov,A/Las Vegas USA 1999. (17.¤xb7+?! Berg,E−Aagaard,J/Stockholm SWE 2005)
12.¥h4 g5 13.¥f2 gxf4 14.£xf4 b5 15.¢b1 b4 16.¤e2 ¥b7 17.¦hf1 ¤e5 the strong knight on e5 exerts pressure on White's position, 18.h3 h5³ Leko,P−Anand,V/Leon ESP 2001)
12.a3 (12.¦he1 ¥b7 13.£h3?! b4! 14.¤b1 e5! and White was crushed, Kamsky,G−Topalov,V/Sofia BUL 2006) 12...¦b8 13.¦he1 b4 14.axb4 ¦xb4 15.¢b1 ¥b7 16.£h3 ¤c5 17.¤xc5 dxc5 18.e5 ¤d5 19.¤xd5 ¥xd5 20.c3 ¦b3 21.¥c2² Leko,P−Kasparov,G/Linares ESP 2001 Black's king could become a problem.
8.£d3!? This slightly more active deployment of the queen has received some attention of late. 8...£xb2 9.¦b1 £a3 10.f5 ¥e7 11.fxe6 fxe6 12.¥e2 £a5!? 13.¥d2 £c7 14.g4! Radjabov's move, (14.0-0 0-0 didn't really trouble Black in Gashimov,V−Grischuk,A/FIDE Grand Prix, Elista 2008) 14...h6 15.£h3!? (15.e5 dxe5 16.£g6+
¢d8!? Mamedov,N−Safarli,E/Azeri Championship, Baku 2009.) 15...0-0! (15...¦h7?!
56
Gashimov,V−Grischuk,A/World Team Championship, Bursa 2010.) 16.g5 hxg5 17.¤xe6 £c6 18.0-0 d5! Gashimov,V−Karjakin,S/Melody Amber (rapid), Nice 2010.
8...¤c6!? Black chickens out but gets into something that resembles a Rauzer. 9.¥xf6
(9.¤b3?! ¤g4! Black avoids the capture on f6, and leaves the g5−bishop 'high and dry', Savchenko,B−Naiditsch,A/Moscow RUS 2007, 9.0-0-0 can also claim a little advantage after 9...£xd4 10.£xd4 ¤xd4 11.¦xd4) 9...gxf6 10.¤b3 ¥d7 11.0-0-0 0-0-0 12.¥e2 h5 13.¢b1 ¢b8 14.¦hf1 ¥e7 15.¦f3 ¦dg8 (15...¦c8 16.¦h3 ¤a5 17.¥xh5±
Kersten,U−Gutman,L/Altenkirchen GER 1999., Georgiev feels 15...h4 to be more accurate) 16.¥f1 h4 a defensive method worked out by Georgiev in the first edition of 'The Sharpest Sicilian'. 17.£e1 (17.a3 ¦h5! Luther,T−Sedlak,N/Arvier 2007)
A major crossroads. 9.¤b3!? Luther thinks that this is White's best course of action. 9...£a3 (9...¤c6 is worse
because of 10.¥xf6 gxf6 11.¤a4 £a3 12.¤b6 Rogers,I−Van der Sterren,P/Hertogenbosch NED 1999, 9...¤bd7!? is unusual, but likely to transpose, 10.¥xf6 gxf6 11.¦b1!?
Spraggett,K−Komljenovic,D/Seville ESP 2007) 10.¥xf6 gxf6 11.¥e2 h5!? first played by Fischer, Black stops ¥h5, (11...¤c6 12.0-0 unclear, Kasimdzhanov,R−Sadvakasov,D/Skanderborg DEN 2003) 12.0-0 ¤c6 13.¢h1 (13.¤b1 is also dangerous, see Bluvshtein,M−Roschina,T/Zurich SUI 2005) 13...¥d7 14.¤d1 (14.¤b1 is the famous 11th game from Spassky−Fischer) 14...£a4?! 15.c4! and White won convincingly in Spraggett,K−Rodshtein,M/Andorra la Vella AND 2006.
The most direct, it fell out of favour when good defences were found, but now it is the key
battleground again. Others: 10.f5 One of many sharp alternatives. 10...¤c6 11.fxe6 (11.¤xc6 bxc6 12.¥e2 ¥e7 13.0-0 0-0
14.¦b3 £c5+ 15.¥e3 is another repetition) 11...fxe6 12.¤xc6 bxc6 13.e5 XIIIIIIIIY 9r+l+kvl-tr0 9+-+-+-zpp0 9p+pzppsn-+0 9+-+-zP-vL-0 9-+-+-+-+0 9wq-sN-+-+-0 9P+PwQ-+PzP0 9+R+-mKL+R0 xiiiiiiiiy
This sharp method leads to lots of draws, strangely enough. It's a long forcing line where
leaving the theory could be fatal. (13.¥e2!? ¥e7 14.0-0 0-0 (14...£a5!? is a risky attempt to play for a win, see Mueller,M−Schlosser,P/Germany 2004) 15.¦b3 (15.¢h1!? ¦a7 16.£e3 ¦d7 17.¦b8!? Ivanchuk,V−Carlsen,M/Melody Amber (rapid), Nice 2010.) 15...£c5+ 16.¢h1 (16.¥e3 leads to a repetition: 16...£e5 17.¥d4 £a5
18.¥b6 £e5 etc.) 16...d5!? Ivanchuk,V−Grischuk,A/Russian Team Championship, Dagomys 2010.) 13...dxe5 14.¥xf6 gxf6 15.¤e4 Now there is another choice: 15...£xa2 This move leads to several forced draws. (15...¥e7 16.¥e2 h5 is also perfectly reasonable when 17.¦f1!? is White's latest try, Thinius,M−Kersten,U/Bad Zwesten GER 2006.) 16.¦d1 ¥e7 17.¥e2 (Hector's 17.¥d3 is interesting) 17...0-0 18.0-0 ¦a7 19.¦f3 The most accurate. (19.£h6?! £xc2! this may be Black's only winning attempt, (19...¦d7 20.¦f3 transposes) 20.¤xf6+ (20.¥d3? Kleijn,C−Hoffmann,M/Harmonie Open, Groningen 2007) 20...¥xf6 21.¦xf6 £c5+ 22.¢h1 ¦g7 and Black has defended his position, Bender,I−Senff,M/Zagreb CRO 2006.) 19...¢h8 (19...¦d7 might be the same, but allows 20.¥d3!? Grischuk,A−
58
Anand,V/Linares 2009) 20.¦g3 ¦d7 21.£h6 and draws, see Vallejo Pons,F−Kasparov,G/Moscow RUS 2004.
10.¥e2 ¥e7 11.0-0 ¤c6 12.¤xc6 bxc6 13.e5 dxe5 14.fxe5 £c5+ 15.¢h1 £xe5 16.¥f4 £c5 17.¤a4 £a7 18.¤b6 0-0 19.¤xa8 £xa8 20.¦b3 £a7 21.¥e3 c5= Salov,S−De Firmian,N/Hamburg GER 1999, Black has 2 pawns for the exchange and a solid position.
¦c7 19.£e3 h4³ Stripunsky,A−De Firmian,N/Chicago 2000, in addition to being up a pawn Black has the bishop pair and a central pawn wall.) 12.0-0 ¤d7 13.¥f3 ¤c5 14.e5 dxe5 15.fxe5 ¥h6 16.£e1 f5 17.¢h1 ¥d7 18.¥xh5 ¥g7 19.¥f3 ¦c8 20.¤d1 b5³ Hracek,Z−Georgiev,K/Batumi GEO 1999 Black's position makes a lot more sense than White's.
10...dxe5
10...h6!? 11.¥h4 (11.¥xf6 attempting to take advantage of Black's move order, 11...gxf6 12.exd6!? (12.¤e4 leads to a forced draw) 12...£xd6 13.¤e4 £d8 14.£c3! activating the queen when White appears to have at least sufficient play for his pawn, Del Rio Angelis,S−Vallejo Pons,F/Spanish Championship, Leon 2006.) 11...dxe5 (11...g5!?
Carlsson,P−Malisauskas,V/European Team Championship, Crete 2007) 12.fxe5 ¤d5!?
a) 12...g5!? 13.exf6 (13.¥f2? Anand,V−Nepomniachtchi,I/Mainz (rapid) 2009.) 13...gxh4 14.¥e2 (14.¤e4 is no less critical) 14...£a5 15.0-0 Bromberger,S−Areshchenko,A/German Bundesliga 2010.
b) 12...¤fd7 transposes to the mainline 13.¤xd5 exd5 14.e6 ¥xe6 15.¤xe6 fxe6 16.¥d3 ¥e7 This all seems pretty logical. White
has the bishop pair and Black's king will have to stay in the centre, but it is two pawns and Black's king will find refuge behind those two extra centre pawns, see Motylev,A−Sutovsky,E/Khanty−Mansiysk Olympiad 2010.
10...¤fd7!? was long condemned, but quite possibly this move can be revived with some 21st Century analysis, 11.f5! ¤xe5 12.fxe6 fxe6 13.¥e2 ¤bc6! see Keres,P−Fuderer,A/Gothenburg Interzonal 1955.
59
11.fxe5 ¤fd7 12.¤e4
Tal's idea. When Keres first introduced the sharp 10 e5 he preferred 12.¥c4 but it's hard to believe that
this, while dangerous, isn't just objectively good for Black, see Manduch,M−Avellan,G/correspondence 2006.
12...h6!
This has long been proven to be the best move as the bishop must be forced to the exposed square on h4.
12...£xa2?! immediately is met by 13.¦b3! with the idea 13...£a1+ 14.¢f2 £a4 15.¤xe6! fxe6 16.¤d6+ ¥xd6 17.£xd6
13.¥h4
13.¥b5!? hxg5 (13...axb5!? 14.¤xb5 hxg5 is a queen sacrifice which theory has long approved of, see Stellwagen,D−Anand,V/German Bundesliga 2009) 14.¦b3 £xa2 15.£c3 with sharp exciting play, that leads to another forced draw! Shabalov,A−Areshchenko,A/Port Erin IOM 2006.
13.¦b3 is a pretty rare continuation, 13...£a4 14.¥e3 ¤c6 15.¥e2 ¤cxe5 16.0-0 ¥e7 Del Rio Angelis,S−Rowson,J/Calvia Olympiad 2004, when 17.£c3 retains some compensation.
This may be safest. 20...¦d8 with sharp play, see Motylev,A−Anand,V/Wijk aan Zee NED 2007. 20...¦e8?! according to Georgiev this move is refuted, 21.0-0! f5! 22.£g3!? ¤c6! Sensibly
developing. 23.£g6 £d8 (23...fxe4? appears to have been busted in the computer game Rybka−Shredder, Amsterdam 2007.) 24.¦d3! (24.c4 ¤e7! Shabalov,A−Ehlvest,J/US Championship, Stillwater 2007., 24.¥c4 ¢h8! 25.¤g5! £xg5! 26.£xe8+
¢h7 Shirov,A−Ftacnik,L/Baden Baden 2007, when I suggest 27.¥f4!?) 24...¦e7 (24...¤e7 25.£xe6+ ¢h8 26.¦g3 fxe4 27.¦xg7! wins) 25.¦g3 ¤d4 26.¥d3 has scored well for White in several correspondence games.
8...h6!? this might be a bit too early, 9.¥h4 ¤bd7 (9...g5 This is the Gothenburg Variation, named after the Swedish city where the 1955 Interzonal was played. As the story goes it was played 3 times in rd 14 by Argentinean players against Soviet players. 10.fxg5 ¤fd7 11.¤xe6!? Khruschiov,A−Paramonov,D/St Petersburg RUS 2001) 10.0-0-0 £c7 11.¥e2! this is effective now that Black has weakened g6, and inhibits ...g5 as it controls the g4−square, 11...b5 (11...g5!? 12.fxg5 ¤e5 13.£g3! Spraggett,K−Andriasian,Z/Cappelle la Grande FRA 2007 − in the light of this game this move is close to winning!) 12.¥xf6! ¤xf6 13.e5 ¥b7 14.£g3 dxe5 15.fxe5 ¤d7 16.¤xe6! fxe6 17.¥h5+ ¢d8 18.£xg7 ¦f8 19.¥g4 ¦e8! the best defence (19...£c5? lost quickly in Vasquez,R−Contreras,H/Minneapolis USA 2005) 20.¦hf1 see Kosten,A−Movsziszian,K/La Pobla de Lillet ESP 2005.
10.¥d3 h6 This transposes to the so called "Browne Variation" popularized by 6 time USA
champion Walter Browne. ( It is Black's safest alternative to the move 10...b5 11.¦he1 ¥b7 12.£g3! this move was brought to prominence in the 15th game of the first Fischer−Spassky match, 12...b4 13.¤d5! exd5 14.exd5 ¢d8 15.¤c6+ (15.£e3?!
Goh Wei Ming−Sandy,K/Asian Universities Games 2006) 15...¥xc6 16.dxc6 with a strong, maybe winning, attack, Vuckovic,B−Tadic,B/Herceg Novi SCG 2005) 11.¥h4 (11.h4!? is a fun alternative, Navara,D−Adly,A/Dubai UAE 2005) 11...g5 This secures the e5 point for black's knights. 12.fxg5 ¤e5 Black's control of e5 makes his position tough to crack. 13.£e2 (13.gxf6!? ¤xf3 14.gxf3 ¥f8 15.f4 is a sharp queen sac, Azarov,S−Predojevic,B/Turin ITA 2006) 13...¤fg4 14.h3 (14.¤f3 This is a better try. 14...hxg5 (14...¤xf3 15.£xf3 ¤e5 16.£h5 ¤g6! is Goh Wei Ming−Terry Chua/Singapore Chess Federation 2009) 15.¥xg5?! this move doesn't have a particularly good reputation, White takes a pawn but exchanges his good bishop and leaves himself weak on the dark squares, (15.¥g3 ¥d7 16.h3 ¤xf3 17.gxf3 ¤e5 18.f4 gxf4
19.¥xf4 0-0-0 is about equal) 15...¥xg5+ 16.¤xg5 £c5! this move further enhances Black's control of the dark squares, Mamedov,R−Areshchenko,A/Moscow RUS 2007) 14...hxg5 15.¥g3 (15.hxg4?! ¦xh4 Stripunsky−Wojtkiewicz/Chicago 2000)
15...¤f6 16.¤f3 ¤h5 17.¥h2 b5 (17...¥d7 is reasonable as well, Podesta,D−Szmetan,J/Buenos Aires ARG 2001) 18.¤xe5 dxe5 19.¥xb5+? This has absolutely no chance of working. (19.¢b1 ¤f4 20.£f3 ¥d7 21.¤e2 Keeps things around equal.) 19...axb5 20.£xb5+ ¥d7 21.£xe5 £xe5 22.¥xe5 f6∓ Sadatnajafi,M−Sadvakasov,D/Dubai UAE 2002.
10...b5
This line was played a lot in the mid−eighties with Black getting decent results. 10...h6!? is risky, 11.¥xf6 ¥xf6 12.h4 £b6! (12...g5?! with sharp play in Kosmo,S−
Berczes,D/Stockholm SWE 2005, but Black's position is often on the verge of a precipice here!) 13.¤b3 (13.¤de2 Motylev,A−Hamitevici,V/European Championship, Rijeka 2010) 13...£c7 (13...¤c5?! 14.¤xc5 £xc5 15.e5! dxe5 16.¤e4 with a strong initiative, Negi,P−Efimenko,Z/San Marino SMR 2006.) 14.e5!? dxe5 15.f5 A
64
Benoni−like breakthrough to generate some pressure and free the e4−square for a knight, see Shirov,A−Dominguez Perez,L/MTel Masters, Sofia 2009.
10...0-0!? it looks terrifying to commit the king at such an early stage (think how often the king escapes to the queenside in the Najdorf), but there is more to this than meets the eye, 11.¥xf6 (11.¥h4! is the real test of the system) 11...¥xf6 12.g5 ¥xd4 13.¦xd4 b5 Black's results here have been excellent, see Burg,T−Baramidze,D/Dieren NED 2006.
11.¥xf6 ¤xf6
11...gxf6!? This sharper recapture was a Fischer favorite. 12.¥d3 (12.f5 is seen in Guseinov,G−Makoli,P/Antalya TUR 2004) 12...¥b7 (12...¤b6 is advised) 13.¢b1 0-0-0 14.h4 ¢b8 15.g5 f5 16.£h5!± Black needs active counterplay after ...gxf6, Trichkov,V−Vladyka,V/Pilsen CZE 2001.
11...¥xf6!? is an attractive idea, if only because there is no prescribed route for White to follow, 12.¥xb5 (12.¤dxb5?! isn't convincing as a2 is hanging, 12...axb5 13.¤xb5
Argyo,N−Balazs,A/Miercurea Ciuc 2005, and now 13...£b8 looks like the most reliable move, 14.¤xd6+ ¢f8 when 15.£b3 seems forced., 12.g5 is Nunn's preference, but after 12...¥xd4 13.¦xd4 ¥b7 the bishop finds a great diagonal, slicing through the centre, and preparing ...¦c8 with sudden pressure down the c−file, see Cao,J−Saligo,P/Belfort 2005) 12...¦b8 (12...0-0!?) 13.¥a4 Malecki,R−Litwin,J/Polanica Zdroj 2005, and why not 13...0-0 now, with the usual compensation?
13.¤f5!? is an amazing new idea, 13...exf5 14.¤d5 £b7 15.£c3 with a powerful attack, see Sulskis,S−Pelletier,Y/Warsaw POL 2005.
13.¥h3!? has had a bad reputation since an emphatic Fischer victory as Black, 13...b4 14.¤ce2 ¤c5 15.¤g3 but see Radjabov,T−Ivanchuk,V/Turin ITA 2006.
65
13...¥xg5+!?
This was considered bad years ago, but now it gives Black good chances. White gets a ¤ on d5 while Black gets good piece play. Black should beware of ¤c7 or ¤f4 into e6 ideas. Black gets good play on the f−file, dark square action and some 2-1 pawn majority action on the kingside.
13...¤c5?! this has had a terrible reputation for a long time and maybe it still does, 14.f6 (14.h4 This is too slow, but Black must play actively. 14...b4 15.¤b1 e5?! (15...¥b7!)
16.¤b3 ¤d7 17.¤1d2 a5 18.¢b1 a4 19.¤c1 ¤b6 20.b3 ¥a6 21.¥xa6 ¦xa6 22.f6 gxf6 23.gxf6± Groszpeter,A−Sammalvuo,T/Paks HUN 2001) 14...gxf6 15.gxf6 ¥f8 16.¦g1! An idea of the late Hungarian IM Perenyi, 16...h5 (16...b4!? is provocative, 17.¤d5 exd5 18.exd5 ¤d7! (18...¥d7 Van Rosmalen,J−Den Boer,P/Groningen NED 2005, 19.¦g7!) 19.¤c6 ¥b7 Kukk,R−Blanco Gramajo,C/World Corr. Championship Final 2007) 17.a3
a) 17.¦g7 b4 (17...¥b7 Lima,D−Morovic Fernandez,I/Sao Paulo BRA 2002) 18.¤d5 exd5 19.exd5 ¤d7 20.¤c6 Black needs nerves of steel in this type of situation, Vasquez,R−Vallejo Pons,F/Tripoli LBA 2004
b) recently the critical line 17.¢b1!? b4 18.¤d5! has posed some problems. 17...¥d7 18.¥h3 ¦b8 19.¦de1 a5 20.¦g7 b4 21.¤d5± White had a dangerous initiative in
14...0-0!? leads to quite complex and forcing play, and might even be Black's best bet,
15.fxe6 (15.£g3 Hector,J−Dvoirys,S/Skelleftea Open 2000.) 15...¤b6! 16.¤d5 ¤xd5 17.exd5 fxe6! this seems to equalize, Radjabov,T−Cheparinov,I/European Team Championship, Crete 2007.
15.£h5 £e7
Arguably the main move. There is a big alternative in 15...£d8 16.¦g1
b) 16.¤xe6 ¥xe6 17.fxe6 0-0 (17...g6 18.exf7+ ¢xf7 19.£e2 ¦c8 20.¥h3 ¦c4 (20...¦xc3!? 21.bxc3 £c7 Black has good chances on the dark squares.) 21.¦hf1+ ¢g7 Black was solid in Butkiewicz−Mazurkiewicz Poland 2002) 18.¦g1 ¥f6 19.¥h3 ¢h8 20.¤d5 g6 21.£e2 fxe6 22.¥xe6 ¥g7∓ Rajlich,V−Peng Zhaoqin/Budapest HUN 2001 In the bishop of opposites middlegame Black's is superior.
16...¥f6 17.fxe6 0-0 18.¥h3 fxe6 (18...¤g6? Nemeth−Butunoi/Dortmund GER 2003, 18...g6
19.¤d5 ¢h8 20.£e2 transposes) 19.¥xe6+ ¢h8 20.¤d5 g6 21.£e2 a critical position for the variation, Kochetkova,J−Lomako,A/Orel RUS 2006.
16.¤xe6 ¥xe6 17.fxe6 g6 18.exf7+ ¢xf7!
18...¤xf7?! Black should leave the strong knight on e5 alone. 19.£e2 0-0 20.¤d5 £e5 Now the wrong piece occupies the e5 point. 21.¥h3 ¥f6 22.c3² Holusova−Tsai 41st World Junior Goa 2002.
19.£h3
19.£e2 ¢g7 20.¤d5 £a7 21.h4 ¥h6 22.h5 ¦af8 Mendoza,R−Bruzon,L/Cali COL 2001 With good dark square play.
19...¢g7 20.¤d5 £d8 21.¥e2
21.£c3 ¦a7 A frequently seen idea. Black rook combines defense (against the knight on c7) and offense (doubling rooks on the f−file). Vuckovic,B−Nakamura,H/Bermuda BER 2002.