NationaI Association for the Advancement of lndigeno C軸丁昨iED MAiし構: 7012 1010 0001 INTERNATIONAL AFFIDAVIT and NOTICE O IDENTITY THEFT, UNLAWFUL CONVERSION) HC CLEANSING AGAINST AMERICAN ABORI DEMAND FOR IDENTITY CORRECTIO To: John H・ Thompson, Director, Foreign Trade Processing Uni 1201 EAST lOTH street, Je節ersonvi11e,血diana 47132 and Penny PritZker, Secretary of Commerce’United States of Amer With all due respect and courtesy, “You” are hereby served “Your” o鉦cial capac垂I aS O餓cial govemment representatives o accordance with ``Your” OATH of OFFICE and “Your” promise and acts of ‘`FRAUD”, aS Well as all other domestic and intemational DEFINITIONS : ・ “YOU” and “YOUR” means and refers to: John H. Thompson, Penny Bureau, United States Department of Commerce, State Of Teme America and the United States Coxporation; ・ “PETITIONER(S)” means: Signatories to this presentment wh validating their claims of being classified as高Negro�or %CoI those known as Choctaw’Chahta, Chatot, Xulae, Chickas Onondaga, Creek, Nahaganset, Cherokee, Aniyunwlya’Kituw Geechee, Shawnee, Shaawanwaki heritage and others; ● αAMERICAN ABORIGINE�within the context of this %NOTIC Indians reclassified as “CoIored” and in many instances `Negro” . “EMGRANT”: A person who leaves their own country in order ・ “NEGRO” within血is “NOTICE” means: Dark, black, mulatto, Whit OCCaSionally capitalized for the purpose of bringmg reSPeCt benefit of“YOU’’the recipient, and not as special entitlement or POlitical legal reference・ FIRST: This is lawful ConstnlCtive Notice and is sent purs Nations Declaration on the Rights for Indigenous People, th PurSuant to “Your” Oath swom by you to the Constitution of C‘Your” written response to me specific to the su切ect matter. C‘Your Pagelof21 留意帥 ‖‖」聞 鳳硝 急博 聞問
21
Embed
NAAIP American Aborigine International Affidavit and Notice Foreign Trade Scanned
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
NationaI Association for the Advancement of lndigenous PeopIe
C軸丁昨iED MAiし構: 7012 1010 0001 9134 1317
INTERNATIONAL AFFIDAVIT and NOTICE OF CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD
IDENTITY THEFT, UNLAWFUL CONVERSION) HCONOMIC DECEPTION and ETHNEC
CLEANSING AGAINST AMERICAN ABORIGINE PEOPLE
DEMAND FOR IDENTITY CORRECTION
To: John H・ Thompson, Director, Foreign Trade Processing Unit Bureau
1201 EAST lOTH street, Je節ersonvi11e,血diana 47132
and
Penny PritZker, Secretary of Commerce’United States of America
With all due respect and courtesy, “You” are hereby served in “Your” individual capacity and in
“Your” o鉦cial capac垂I aS O餓cial govemment representatives of the United States of America; and in
accordance with ``Your” OATH of OFFICE and “Your” promise and obligation to promote integrity and reject
acts of ‘`FRAUD”, aS Well as all other domestic and intemational crimes.
DEFINITIONS :
・ “YOU” and “YOUR” means and refers to: John H. Thompson, Penny Pritzker, Foreign Trade Processlng
Bureau, United States Department of Commerce, State Of Temessee’State OfVirginia’United States of
America and the United States Coxporation;
・ “PETITIONER(S)” means: Signatories to this presentment who are in po誓Sion of o縦cial records
validating their claims of being classified as高Negro�or %CoIored�; aboriglnal beneficiaries related to
those known as Choctaw’Chahta, Chatot, Xulae, Chickasaw, Chikasa, Saktchihuma’Chakchiuma,
Onondaga, Creek, Nahaganset, Cherokee, Aniyunwlya’Kituwa) Lenape, Yamassee) Wyandot’Seminole,
Geechee, Shawnee, Shaawanwaki heritage and others;
● αAMERICAN ABORIGINE�within the context of this %NOTICE,, means: American Indians, American
Indians reclassified as “CoIored” and in many instances `Negro” and or “Freedman’’;
. “EMGRANT”: A person who leaves their own country in order to settle pemanently in another;
・ “NEGRO” within血is “NOTICE” means: Dark, black, mulatto, White, COIored, Indian, aborigme and is
OCCaSionally capitalized for the purpose of bringmg reSPeCt and attention to the tem “NEGRO” for the
benefit of“YOU’’the recipient, and not as special entitlement or identifier o亀Or for Petitioners; uSed as a
POlitical legal reference・
FIRST: This is lawful ConstnlCtive Notice and is sent pursuant to Common Intemational Law, the United
Nations Declaration on the Rights for Indigenous People, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and
PurSuant to “Your” Oath swom by you to the Constitution of the United States of America, and requlreS
C‘Your” written response to me specific to the su切ect matter. C‘Your” failure to respond or rebut as stipulated,
Pagelof21
留意帥
‖‖」聞
鳳硝
急博
聞問
with particularity, eVerything in this Constructive Notice and A鯖davit with which ``You” disagree, is “Your”
law珊, legal and binding agreement with and admission to the fact that everything in this Constructive Notice
and Intemational A飾davit is true, COrreCt, 1egal, law餌and fully binding upon “You” in any court in America
and the World Court, Without “Your” protest or objection or that of those who may represent “You”. “Your”
silence is�Your�acquleSCenCe and shall be met with tort for “fraud�and other causes to remedy violations of
United States Federal Law and Customary Intemational Law and Trade at the District Court in Washington,
D.C.
SECOND: This communication is extended in the Spirit of“Peace’Hamony and Balance’宜om the National
Association for the Advancement of Indigenous People aOAAIP) located in the region of Cherokee, North
Carolina, America;
and comes j.om Hemoc Xelup, Member and National Director for the National Association for the
Advancement of Indigenous People (NAAIP). NAAIP is a United Nations registered NGO and was established
by Bureau of Indian A厳正s 25 CFR recognized aborigine and Native Americans [msn。m。r] and non-reCOgnized
aborigine and Native Americans [misnomer] along with signatories foreign and domestic.
The puxpose of this cormunication is for the specific action of establishing an o飾cial record of this
COmmunication and for the expeditious correction of “Your” o飾cial public United States Census records as
applied to the herein mentioned and listed American Aborigine.
For centuries prlOr tO American invasion by Europe, aboriginal tribes, tlans, PeOPle and nations flourished
during pre and early coIonial history. Thousands of aboriginal groups occupied the lands of North America,
and during the development and fomation of the United States, U.S. policy makers devised concepts to deny
Certainわoriginal groups rights to exist as members of the human family. These specific groups were denied
the right to identity, Culture and nationality; all due to United States of America policies implemented for the
beneficial enrichment and interests of the European ruling class under a system of suppression and
coIonization.
The United States exists as an abstract entity, and within and beyond its o飾cial buildings and vaults of
infomational documents are創es reflecting the unrevealed secret lives, Cultures, PeOPle and nations of
Aborigines in Americans where truth lies uurevealed to血e misclassified benefactors. “You” and “Your”
O飾ce, COmPlicit with United States policy, have applied and continue to apply methods of coIonization and
disenfrmchisement through concerted national acts of political misidentification, raCe misclassification,
COmmerCial identity theft, ethnicdy-based judicial oppression, SOCial and economic inequality and constructive
fraud. Today, in North America 2014 AD, m皿ons of unidentified, unreCOgnized and unaccepted aborigine
PeOPle exist in the shadows, PurPOSefully hidden within United States domestic policy.
The United States agenda of coIonization adopted from Spain and France of pre-1500 AD continues today
through means血at are constructively cIoaked; “Your” agency is one such construct aiding in the continuation
Of ethnic cleansing and colonizing through race misclassification. Not allowing the descendants of colonized
and enslaved Negro aborigine to have a culture or identity is a violation of Intemational Law and Treaties.
The United States of America and “Your” agency are co-COnSPlratOrS in the denial and prohibition of the
American Aborigines’protection of their basic human rights, identity, SaCred a正facts and nationality; aCtions
that are contrary to intemational law and “Your” constitutional obligations. The actions of deliberate race and
et血ic misclassification with the intent to ethnically cleanse and sl璃ugate Aborigines in the founding coIonies
Of the united states, and the continuation of such acts, PraCtices and tactics by “Your” Agency and the United
States must now cease in the year 2014; ``Your” Agency and the United States must begin a cessation of
Page2QfZl
misidentification, misclassification and ethnic cleansmg POlicies and begin the removal of and forever
denounce the coIonial methods and doctrines that have been utilized.
It is time to remove the obstacles, quagmlreS, COnCePtS and policies developed by the United States to
disenfranchise mi11ions of Aboriginal People across America leavlng them lost in perpetual ancestral
confusion, SearChing to find what was taken and hidden by the institutions of the United States govemment.
In 2005, at the United Nations World Summit, President Bush submitted a Salvage Claim with the United
Nations to detain, arreSt, Or remOVe immlgrantS from the United States; in part because Bush policy supported
the belief that immlgrantS had destroyed the United States economic infrastructure as dependants in need of
welfare, food stamps, free housmg, Student loan defaults and were the cause of the expansion of criminal
justice systems and processes.
Today, in 2014, the Negro has been relabeled負African-American�; nOW, the legal classification of “African
Immlgrant’ブbelongs to the Negro, and as misclassified benefactors, the Negro descendants are su助ect to listed
Claims made against immigrants by the United States govemment; therefore, immediate redress is sought.
As we approach the Mi11emium Development Goal’s Deadline of 2015言t is imperative to enlist “You” in
making lmmediate change to and correctmg “Petitioners’’’classification. The mandates associated with the
United Nations Sustainable Development Agenda 21 requlreS Written claims of indigenous people, lands,
identity and missions be submi請ed and engaged in writing before 201 5; this submission ofA飾davit to “You”
Satisfies the United Nations requlrement for claims of Petitioners.
Petitioners and signatories to this presentment are in possession of o鎖cial records validating their claims of
being classified as `Negro” and “CoIored”; beneficiaries of “0” blood lines related to those organically known
as Choctaw, Chahta, Chatot, Xulae, Chickasaw, Chikasa, Saktchihuma, Chakchiuma, Onondaga, Creek,
1779 South Carolina disenflmchises Negroes. (Keyssar, 354)
1780 Society of Friends and the Pennsylvania Abolition Society petitioned the Pemsylvania legislature to
amend the Gradi“lAbolition Act Qf1780. The petition was a success, and as a result, the Pemsylvania
legislature made it i11egal to transport enslaved children or pregnant woman out of Pemsylvania. The
act made it impossible to use Philadelphia ports to build, Outfit or send ships containing hunan cargo.
Finally, the act also placed heavy fines on kidnappmg enSlaved African置Americans and made it i11egal
to separate slave families by more than ten miles.
Revolutionary era constitutions of Virginia, South Carolina, and Georgla eXClude Negroes from the
franchise. (Jordan, 4 1 2)
1781 An estimated 200,000 to 250,000 Indians are living east ofthe MississIPPl, and by 1780, almost all
Indians have been pushed west of the Appalachians. 0[ugent, 1 0)
1783 Treaty of Paris extends recognition to the United States as an independent nation. Acquisition of
Trans-Appalachia, 0[ugent, 4), O範cially established the United states of America as valid
govemment.
1786 In Massachusetts, an aCt Of 1786 voids marriages between whites and Negroes. (Jordan, 472)
Massachusetts legislature votes to expel all Negroes who are not citizens of one ofthe states. (Litwack,
16). It is clear Negroes in al)undance were being disenfrmchised and clearly not slaves from the trans-
Atlantic slave trade.
1787 Thomas Jeiferson publishes Notes on救aわQf "格inia, his claims endorsed racialism, Negro
intellectual inferiority, and calls for the coIonization of free Negroes to their native climate of all
Negroes. (Jordan, 547)
1788 The U.S. Constitution is made, and specifica11y excludes Indian nations from inclusion in the
American political system. Classified as foreign nations and “Indians not taxed,” the Constitution gave
Congress exclusive jurisdiction for dealing with Indian tribes. (Brown and Stentiford, 579)
South Carolina bans slave importations. (Jordan, 3 1 8)
1790 National campaign from 1790 through 1800 was openly waged to racially cleanse the existing united
StateS Of Negroes, Virginia in particular, Which contains 40% of a11 [EAST APPALACHIA] Negro
POPulation. (Jordan, 542) Over 860,000 Negro recorded throughout all the coIonies, (Russell, 7he F7.ee
Negro in Wginia, 16-41) Virginia Bureau ofthe Census; See also Zhe Jbumal QfNeg7.O HistoIy VIⅡ,
247-283.
The first federal naturalization law, the Naturalization Act of 1790, reStricts American citizenship to“free white persons.’’(Jordan, 34 1 ); Negroes are not pemitted, but they are highly populated.
1791 Vemont admitted to the Union. (Keyssar, 352)
1792 Kentucky admitted to the Union. (Nugent, 44), and Delaware disenfranchises Negroes. (Keyssar, 354)
1794 Congress passes a law forbidding Americans from participating in the intemational slave trade.
(Jordan, 327), and this is done because America already has too many Negro.
Page50f21
1795 Treaty of Greenvi11e was delivered signed allegedly declaring Indians ceding title to 3/4ths of the
future state of Ohio (Nugent, 44), and血e Treaty of San Lorenzo, aCquisition of the Yazoo Strip
(Southem Mississippi and Southem Alabama) from Spain, OJugent, 1 00) were treaties which includedNegro Indians.
1796 Tennessee admitted to the Union. (Nugent, 44)
1799 New York adopts a law for gradual emancipation. (Davis, Xiv)
Ke血Cky disenfranchises 41,085 free Negroe? and (Keyssar, 354)), (Brown and Stentiford’437) not
any of these free people were brought to AmerlCa Via the trans-Atlantic slave trade.
A slave conspiracy known as Gabriel’s Rebellion is foiled in Richmond, Virginia (Hinks and
McKivigan, XXXix) where the Negro clearly shows the vent of rebellion against coIonization and
Slavery.
South Carolina outlaws residence of free Negroes. (Jordan, 399)
Georgia prohibits irmlgration of free Negroes' (Famam, 1 99-200)
1819 Anti S]ave Trade Act March 3, 1819; after which bringmg African Slaves to the United States was
made illegal.
Maine admitted to the Union. (Litwack, 3 1)
Alabama admi筒ed to the Union and automatically disenfumchises Negroes (Keyssar, 354)
In the states admitted after 1 8 1 9, eVery State but Maine disenfranchised Negroes. (Howe, 497)
1820 Free Negroes could not exercise certain rights and privileges guaranteed to American citizens and
aliens. (Litwack, 33)
Congress authorizes the citizens of Washington, D.C. to elect “white” only cfty o餓cials and to adopt a
COde goveming free Negroes and slaves. (Litwack, 31)
Under the Anti Slave Trade Act, additiona=aws made transatlantic slavlng a m利Or Crime under
penalty of death in this year 1820 African slave trade was abolished completely and in 1824 and
labeled as plraCy.
South Carolina prohibits immigration of free Negroes. (Famam, 1 99-200)
1821 Missouri admitted to the Union, 0'ugent, 128) and immediately disenfranchises Negroes. (Keyssar,
354)
1822 Black males lose the right to vote in Rhode Island. (Howe, 497)
Mississippi prohibits immigration of free Negroes. (Famam, 1 99-200)
1824 Ohio state legislature passes a resolution proposmg African coIonization linked with gradual
emancipation. The resolution is soon seconded by seven other states and Delaware. (Howe, 265)
Elizabeth Heyrick anonymously publishes the pamphlet h77mediate, nOt Gradual Emanc車)ation (Hinks
and McKivigan, Xl) again depicting the Negro removal from native lands.
1826 Creek cession in Georgia. (Howe, 354)
North Carolina prohibits immigration of free Negroes. (Faman, 1 99-200)
FIorida Te正tory prohibits immigration of free Negroes. (Famam, 199-200)
1827 Gradual emancipation comes to qu end in New York. Slavery al)Olished. (Howe, 174)
Michigan Territory restricts immlgration of free Negroes. (Famam, 220)
1830 170,130 Negroes living in Kentucky, (Brown and Stentiford, 438) and not from African slave trade.
The United States so desperately wanted to remove the Negro that in 1 830 Congress passed and issued
new rules and laws to send Negro Emigrants to Africa whenever and wherever possible. flmest Coリ
ENDIAN REMOVAL ACT May 28, 1 830 broadened the United States agenda of ethnic cleansmg and
genocide and slavery ofthe aboriginal Negro people of America.From early coIonization, The United States began encouraglng and negotiating with the Negro to
emlgrate tO Africa; but year after year the hopes of removmg the Negro from American soil failed. The
Negro was only a valuable asset to southem slavers and plantation owners, Who were commercially
driven to support slavery of the dark aborigine called Negro. Rufas King - U.S Senate proposed
Selling public lands to finance Negro emlgration to Africa.
工owa Territory prohibits immigration of free Negroes.岬amam, 220)
1860 In 1790 the first federal census reported 697,897 slaves (Table l). Though concen億atec=n血e southem
StateS, eSPeCially in the tobacco production areas of Maryland and Virginia, Slaves were reported in all
血e states except Massachusetts. By 1810, tWO years after the cIose ofthe foreign slave trade, the slave
POPulation had increased to almost l.16 million. Yet after the trans-Atlantic slave trade was bamed in
the United States, in 1 850 DeBow Statistics review for the United States recorded an increase in slave
POPulation of more than l,740,000 pcople, While no foreign slave trade existed in America. ThisClearly represents the kidnappmg of at least two million Negro from within the boundaries of North
America and血e United States. The book “Economics ofAmerican Negro Slavery 1 830-1860” written
by Robert Evans, Jr., Massachuse請S Institute Of TechnoIogy, (DeBow, Statistical review, P. 94.
SuggeSted that in1 850 about 400,000 slaves lived in cities and towus and 2,500,000 slaves of all ages
WOrked in agriculture with l,815,000 in co備On, 350,000 in tobacco, 150,000 in cane sugar, 125,000 in
ri∞, and 60,000 in hemp. 5 Ukich B. Phillips, American Negro Slavery, New York, Appleton-
Century, 1936, P. 391. 188
All those acts were committed in violation of the雄Law of Nations�and after the civil war that ended the
SOuthem United States slavery, the pro∞SS Of misclassification inteusified.
1910 Temessee initiates the Negro reclassification prooess by creating the “One Drop Rule”.
The most damaging of all acts and methods created by the United states defined race by the ’’one-drop
rule’’, Which was instituted by the state govemment of Temessee and was adopted throughout the
∞ntinental United states, defining as “colored” persous with any African or Native American ancestry.
It also expanded the scope of Virginia’s ban on interracial marriage (anti-miscegenation law) by
Crininalizing all mamages between white persous and non-White persons.
1912 As reglStrar, Prmary CustOdian and developer of Negro and Indian classification policy for Virginla,
Wblter Ashbv Plecker d加ected Jhe reclass筋catio7? Of marlγ all Wrginia虎3dians as colo招d on their
birth and marriajZ.e Cert妨cates because he was conv加ced fhat most k!dia棚had A舟ican heritage and
Were #γinfr /0 ’bass’’as hdian /O eVa虎segrefration. Consequently, tWO Or three generations of
Virginia, Teme;see, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Kentueky Ohio, Florida, North and So融
Carolina, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Michigan, Indiana, Illinois,
Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Vemont and Louisiana aborigine had their ethnic identity altered and
misclassified on the public record docunents; equating to “Paper Genooide”.
Page9of21
The creators of the Racial血tegrity Act John Powell and Eamest S. Cox believed that血e Racial
Integrity Act was needed as %maintenance of the integrity of the white race to preserve its superior
blood�and also believed in what was ca11ed “the great man concept” which means that if the races
were to intersect that it would lower the rate of great white men in the world.
1924 On March 20, 1924 the Virginia General Assembly passed two laws that had arisen out of
COntemPOrary COnCemS about eugenics and race: SB 219, entitled ’’The Racial Integrity Act’’and “SB
281” ; ’一An ACT to provide for the sexual sterilization of inmates of State institutions in certain cases’’,
henceforth referred to as ’’The Sterilization Act’一; the result ofwhich can only be a credit towards race
discrimination and ethnic cleansmg and genocide.
The Racial Integrity Act required that a racial description of every person be recorded at birth and
divided society into only two classifications: White and co置ored (essentially all other, Which included
numerous dark American indigenous people.). The “Racial Integrity Act’’was designed to erase Dark
Indians from the public record and through constructive fraud forced the Negro into ``pemanent exile
in his own home land�.
In 1967 the law was overtumed by the United States Supreme Court in its ruling on Loving v.招培jnia,
but not before more than twenty other states adopted the same racially suppressive laws.
The Racial Integrity Act called for only two racial categories to be recorded on birth certificates, rather
than the traditional six: ’一white’’and ’一colored’’(which included / includes) Indian and all discemible
mixed race persons.) The effedts were quickly seen.
1930 The U.S. Census for Virginia recorded only 779 Indians and the rest were classified as `Negro”; by
1940, that number had been reduced to 198 because血e rest were labeled Negro. In e紙さCt, this fom of
e血nic cleansmg literally erased 90% of all aboriginal history from recorded history in America; the
aborigine was being erased as a group from o綿cial United States records.
1934 Memorial to Congress was submitted and the Senate response: ’’Therefore be it resoIved by the House
Of Delegates, the Senate concumng, that the General Assembly of Virginia memorialize the Congress
Of the United States to make provisions for the coIonization of persons of African descent, With their
OWn COnSent言n Liberia, Or at any Other place or places on the African continent.’一
1936 Under the “Negro Peace Movement’’, Negroes could receive federal aid if they agreed to emlgrate tO
A餓ca and settle upon lands held in trust for emlgrantS from the United States. Many ofthe applicants
had been reduced to the reliefrolls, and they appealed to the President to use relieffunds to aid them in
taking up holdings in Liberia. President Roosevelt and the State of Virginia lobbied Congress to
appropriate funds to send more than 350,000 Negro to Africa, but congress would not approve the
funding to relocate those Negro who agreed to go.
1967 Racial Integrity Act inter-raCial mamage laws were found to be unconstitutional by the United
States Supreme Court, and in 1975 the Virginia’s Assembly finally repealed the remainder of
the Racial Integrity Act. All classified Virginia Negro if bom before July 1960 - Supreme
Court in 1968 ruled Negro could reclassify and ruled against血e ``Racial Integrity Act.
1968 It is common place in America for most Negro to now be referred to as “Black” in all United States
CenSuS and commercial records. This class綿cation has pemanently entrenched the aborigine into a
SuStained state of underclass totally dependent people in America, Without history, heritage, Culture or
true identity.
1986 Finally言n America, the e鮮brts to remove the Negro from true aboriginal standing and status, the
Aborigine, Who was reclass綿ed as “Negro”, then reclassified as “Black’’is now reclassified as an
immlgrant Called “African American”; a foreigner to the lands and aboriginal rights of his own home
ProVided by nature.
1997 On March 3, 1997, then President of the United States, Wi11iam Je節drson Clinton slgned Executive
Order 13037 encompassmg the “Commission to Study Capital Budgeting”, Where he signed a Unifom
Commercial Code -1餌ng to effectively classif)′ United States citizens as Human Capital for the
PurPOSe Of collateral funding with the血temational Monetary Fund. This action was committed
Without “Prior Notice or Prior Consent” of; by or from the parties including “Petitioners’’.
This Executive Order No. 13037 March 4, 1997 (SPeCifica11y section 2 subsection ( b ) ) is a clear
example of commercial fraud and identity theft, Which furthers the deception against the Negro by
PagelOof21
placing the Negro unknowingly into dire intemational debt, Where the descendants of the aborigine
could now face penalties of debt, Which may mClude removal from natural lands to foreign lands,
peIPetual peonage and even debt under certain draconian foreign laws and jurisdiction as a result of