Top Banner
nne EL UNIVERSITY Collcg of Medicine Department of Emergency Medicine The Division of Medical Toxicology at Drexel University College of Medicine appreciates the opportunity to comment on the NTP's Draft Report on Carcinogens Monograph on Antimony Trioxide. Sections 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 provide a detailed review of the common applications of antimony trioxide and its other major forms. However, there was no mention of antimony use in the synthesis of microelectronics. Antimony may be used as a dopant in the manufacturing of semiconductors and should be included (Biefield 2002, Sundar 2010). Of note there has been a historical concern of antimony toxicity secondary to application of Kohl, as one of its preparations is made using powdered stibnite. Analysis of global samples of Kohl have demonstrated only trace amounts of antimony. Ultimately we agree with not listing Kohl as a potential use or exposure of antimony as its concentration is negligible and without clinical effects (Parry 1991 ). The majority of human studies are based on historical evidence from occupational exposure and patient outcomes. Data is extracted from the National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) from 1981 to 1983. As per section 2.3 in this documentation, the highest exposures to antimony (Ill) trioxide and total antimony take place in the work setting; Common occupations listed included, but are not limited to the production of batteries, lead pipes, ammunition and flame retardant materials. Ammunition production is listed as a possible workplace exposure however workers at gun firing ranges are omitted. Antimony air concentrations may be elevated in indoor firing ranges and elevated soil concentrations in outdoor firing ranges placing exposed workers at risk (Okkenhaug 2016, Martin 2013, Dams 1988). In Table 4-2, the authors do an excellent job of summarizing the quality of cohort and case-control epidemiological studies in smelter workers. Specific attention is drawn the three selected cohort studies by Jones (1994), Schnorr et al. (1995) and Jones et al. (2007) which exhibit a relationship between antimony exposure and both lung and stomach cancer, but acknowledge confounding factors such as cigarette smoking and other occupational exposures. The provided animal studies in mice, rats and hamsters provide good quality methods and reasonable evidence to display a correlation between inhalational exposure and lung parenchyma tumor growth. Figure 4-1 highlights the risk estimates of lung cancer in workers exposed to antimony. While the RR of 3.25 shown by Jones et al (2007) may indicate antimony exposure as a potential cause, it should be noted that there is wide confidence interval (1.32-21.76). Many of the studies used in Section 5 investigating cancer in animals due to exposure to antimony describe different types of lesions occurring in rodents based on their sex. Meanwhile, all of the human cancer studies were investigating exposure in males. The report does not highlight whether or not this would be an important consideration or source of bias. Section 6.1.2 provides a brief listing of non-cancer health outcomes resulting from exposure to antimony. Although the draft clearly states that non-cancer health outcomes are described elsewhere, including an ATSDR systematic review, it does proceed to mention certain non-cancer health outcomes. Dermatosis and ocular irritation following occupational antimony exposures are described in the ATSDR review but omitted from this section. An important non-carcinogenic effect of antimony that worths mentioning is increased spontaneous abortion rate among pregnant workers in an antimony plant. 245 N. 15th Street, New College Building, Mail Stop 1011, Philadelphia, PA 19102 I Tel: 215.762.2368 I Fax: 215.762.1307 drexel.edu/medicine
3

n ne E L UNIVERSITY Collcg of Medicine · n ne E L UNIVERSITY Collcg of Medicine Department ofEmergency Medicine The Division of Medical Toxicology at Drexel University College of

Mar 21, 2018

Download

Documents

NguyễnNhân
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • n ne E L UNIVERSITY Collcg of Medicine Department ofEmergency Medicine

    The Division of Medical Toxicology at Drexel University College of Medicine appreciates the opportunity to comment on the NTP's Draft Report on Carcinogens Monograph on Antimony Trioxide.

    Sections 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 provide a detailed review of the common applications of antimony trioxide and its other major forms. However, there was no mention of antimony use in the synthesis of microelectronics. Antimony may be used as a dopant in the manufacturing of semiconductors and should be included (Biefield 2002, Sundar 2010).

    Of note there has been a historical concern of antimony toxicity secondary to application of Kohl, as one of its preparations is made using powdered stibnite. Analysis of global samples of Kohl have demonstrated only trace amounts of antimony. Ultimately we agree with not listing Kohl as a potential use or exposure of antimony as its concentration is negligible and without clinical effects (Parry 1991 ).

    The majority of human studies are based on historical evidence from occupational exposure and patient outcomes. Data is extracted from the National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) from 1981 to 1983. As per section 2.3 in this documentation, the highest exposures to antimony (Ill) trioxide and total antimony take place in the work setting; Common occupations listed included, but are not limited to the production of batteries, lead pipes, ammunition and flame retardant materials. Ammunition production is listed as a possible workplace exposure however workers at gun firing ranges are omitted. Antimony air concentrations may be elevated in indoor firing ranges and elevated soil concentrations in outdoor firing ranges placing exposed workers at risk (Okkenhaug 2016, Martin 2013, Dams 1988).

    In Table 4-2, the authors do an excellent job of summarizing the quality of cohort and case-control epidemiological studies in smelter workers. Specific attention is drawn the three selected cohort studies by Jones (1994), Schnorr et al. (1995) and Jones et al. (2007) which exhibit a relationship between antimony exposure and both lung and stomach cancer, but acknowledge confounding factors such as cigarette smoking and other occupational exposures.

    The provided animal studies in mice, rats and hamsters provide good quality methods and reasonable evidence to display a correlation between inhalational exposure and lung parenchyma tumor growth.

    Figure 4-1 highlights the risk estimates of lung cancer in workers exposed to antimony. While the RR of 3.25 shown by Jones et al (2007) may indicate antimony exposure as a potential cause, it should be noted that there is wide confidence interval (1.32-21.76).

    Many of the studies used in Section 5 investigating cancer in animals due to exposure to antimony describe different types of lesions occurring in rodents based on their sex. Meanwhile, all of the human cancer studies were investigating exposure in males. The report does not highlight whether or not this would be an important consideration or source of bias.

    Section 6.1.2 provides a brief listing of non-cancer health outcomes resulting from exposure to antimony. Although the draft clearly states that non-cancer health outcomes are described elsewhere, including an ATSDR systematic review, it does proceed to mention certain non-cancer health outcomes. Dermatosis and ocular irritation following occupational antimony exposures are described in the ATSDR review but omitted from this section. An important non-carcinogenic effect of antimony that worths mentioning is increased spontaneous abortion rate among pregnant workers in an antimony plant.

    245 N. 15th Street, New College Building, Mail Stop 1011, Philadelphia, PA 19102 ITel: 215.762.2368 IFax: 215.762.1307 drexel.edu/medicine

    http:1.32-21.76

  • IJ RE. I, L LI IVERS IT Y

    CoJlcgcof

    Medicine Department of Emergency Medicine

    Ahmed Mostafa MD

    ./\r----Muhammad Khalid MD

    Prolonged exposure to antimony may cause disturbance in the reproductive system. Rats exposed to

    antimony prior to and during conception are reported to have decreased number of offsprings (ATSDR

    2017). Although the focus of this draft is related to the carcinogenicity of antimony trioxide, we believe if

    non-cancer health outcomes are going to be listed then a more thorough list may be beneficial to readers.

    A minor point is the misspelling of "respiratory" as "resepiratory" at the end of this section (pg 83).

    We thank you for preparing this comprehensive and well-written report. Utilizing evidence from

    protracted human epidemiological studies and animal studies, the authors dutifully summarize and

    conclude that antimony is a carcinogen in mice and rats, but that more research on human

    carcinogenicity is warranted, and such a relationship may only be reasonably speculated at this time.

    Again, thank you for allowing us a platform to provide our comments.

    References:

    Biefeld, Robert M. "The Metal-Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition and Properties of lii-V

    Antimony-Based Semiconductor Materials." Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports 36 4 (2002):

    105-42.

    Sundar S, Chakravarty J. Antimony Toxicity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public

    Health. 2010;7(12):4267-4277. doi:10.3390/ijerph7124267.

    Parry, C., and J. Eaton. "Kohl: A Lead-Hazardous Eye Makeup from the Third World to the First World."

    Environ Health Perspect 94 (1991 ): 121-3.

    Okkenhaug, G., et al. "Antimony (Sb) and Lead (Pb) in Contaminated Shooting Range Soils: Sb and Pb

    Mobility and Immobilization by Iron Based Sorbents, a Field Study." J Hazard Mater 307 (2016): 336-43.

    Martin, W. A., L. S. Lee, and P. Schwab. "Antimony Migration Trends from a Small Arms Firing Range

    Compared to Lead, Copper, and Zinc." Sci Total Environ 463-464 (2013): 222-8.

    245 N. 15th Street, New College Building, Mail Stop 1011, Philadelphia, PA 19102 I Tel: 215.762.2368 I Fax: 215.762.1307

    drexel.edu/medicine

  • DR EXE L UNIVERSITY

    Coll ge of Medicine Department ofEmergency Medicine

    Dams, R., et al. "Element Concentrations in the Air of an Indoor Shooting Range." Science of The Total Environment 77 1 (1988): 1-13.

    Mostafa MH, Sheweita SA, and O'Connor. Relationship between Schistosomiasis and bladder cancer. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 1999. 12(1): 97-111.

    ATSDR. 2017. Draft Toxicological Profile for Antimony and Compounds. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic

    Substances and Disease Registry. 328 pp.

    245 N. 15th Street, New College Building, Mail Stop 1011, Philadelphia, PA 19102 ITel: 215.762.2368 IFax: 215.762.1307 drexel.edu/medicine

    Accessibility Report

    Filename:

    Antimony_Public Comment_Mostafa.pdf

    Report created by:

    Organization:

    [Enter personal and organization information through the Preferences > Identity dialog.]

    Summary

    The checker found no problems in this document.

    Needs manual check: 0

    Passed manually: 2

    Failed manually: 0

    Skipped: 1

    Passed: 29

    Failed: 0

    Detailed Report

    Document

    Rule NameStatusDescription

    Accessibility permission flagPassedAccessibility permission flag must be set

    Image-only PDFPassedDocument is not image-only PDF

    Tagged PDFPassedDocument is tagged PDF

    Logical Reading OrderPassed manuallyDocument structure provides a logical reading order

    Primary languagePassedText language is specified

    TitlePassedDocument title is showing in title bar

    BookmarksPassedBookmarks are present in large documents

    Color contrastPassed manuallyDocument has appropriate color contrast

    Page Content

    Rule NameStatusDescription

    Tagged contentPassedAll page content is tagged

    Tagged annotationsPassedAll annotations are tagged

    Tab orderPassedTab order is consistent with structure order

    Character encodingPassedReliable character encoding is provided

    Tagged multimediaPassedAll multimedia objects are tagged

    Screen flickerPassedPage will not cause screen flicker

    ScriptsPassedNo inaccessible scripts

    Timed responsesPassedPage does not require timed responses

    Navigation linksPassedNavigation links are not repetitive

    Forms

    Rule NameStatusDescription

    Tagged form fieldsPassedAll form fields are tagged

    Field descriptionsPassedAll form fields have description

    Alternate Text

    Rule NameStatusDescription

    Figures alternate textPassedFigures require alternate text

    Nested alternate textPassedAlternate text that will never be read

    Associated with contentPassedAlternate text must be associated with some content

    Hides annotationPassedAlternate text should not hide annotation

    Other elements alternate textPassedOther elements that require alternate text

    Tables

    Rule NameStatusDescription

    RowsPassedTR must be a child of Table, THead, TBody, or TFoot

    TH and TDPassedTH and TD must be children of TR

    HeadersPassedTables should have headers

    RegularityPassedTables must contain the same number of columns in each row and rows in each column

    SummarySkippedTables must have a summary

    Lists

    Rule NameStatusDescription

    List itemsPassedLI must be a child of L

    Lbl and LBodyPassedLbl and LBody must be children of LI

    Headings

    Rule NameStatusDescription

    Appropriate nestingPassedAppropriate nesting

    Back to Top