Top Banner
busting popular media myths Ad impact: what you don’t know could hurt your bottom line Updated Fall 2009
4

Myth Busters: Ad impact, 2009

Jan 28, 2018

Download

Documents

magazinespuntnl
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Myth Busters: Ad impact, 2009

busting popular media myths

Ad impact:what you don’t knowcould hurt your bottom line

Updated Fall 2009

Page 2: Myth Busters: Ad impact, 2009

100

Base: Magazine Readers, U.S. Adults 18+ Source: MRI, Spring Studies 2005 and 2009

Magazine Readers (’000) Adults 18–34 2005 58,945

2009 60,017 102

100

102

Median Issues/Month, Adults 18–34 2005 8.4

2009 8.6

100

260

72

186

Sources: Carat Insight; Nielsen September 2007 – May 2008 (Prime regularly scheduled programs);MRI Fall 2008; MRI Twelveplus 2008

Gross Rating Points of Top 25 Magazines and Prime-Time TV Programsadults 18 – 34

teens 12 – 17

prime-time tv programs

magazines

5-Year Trend in Media Usage 2005 – 2009Total users in thousands ( % increase )

135,282

163,376

180,620

189,315

211,757

221,551

202,873

210,958

180,839

184,358

167,192

163,918

214,774

224,899

Source: MRI Spring studies 2005 and 2009

20052009

Internet

Magazines

Outdoor

Television

Radio

Newspapers

Total Adults

MYTH > NO ONE READS magazines,especially younger consumers.

REALITY > Magazine usage has grown over the past five years at ahigher rate than usage of all other media except the web

REALITY > Readership continues to be strong for adults 18-34

REALITY > Top 25 magazines outperform the top 25 primetimeTV programs in all major demos, including adults18-34 and teens

Page 3: Myth Busters: Ad impact, 2009

Aided Brand Awareness

Message Association

Brand Favorability

Purchase Consideration/Intent

Ad Awareness

}

3.6

4.6 4.7

% > 28 36 36 34 33 33 39 27 34 23 17 60 30 13 56

+12.9

}+23.0

}+10.8

}+10.9 }+11.9

7.8 7.5 7.7

4.2

2.93.7

2.51.9

6.5

3.6

1.6

6.7

• TV only • Incremental Impact of Online to TV • Incremental Impact of Magazines to TV + OnlineBase = 39 Studies. Source: Dynamic Logic 2009.

Poi

nt D

iffer

ence

>

Incremental Effect of Medium on Brand Metrics

Media Performance for Cost per Impact (CPI)Brand Awareness

Brand Familiarity

Purchase Intent

$0.98$1.08

$1.97

$2.61$1.40

$2.58

$1.77$1.23

$2.61Aggregate of 38 studies.Source: Marketing Evolution, 2008

television

magazines

online

magazine tv tv magazine tv + onlinetv only online only only + online + magazine + online + magazine

Aided Brand Awareness

Ad Awareness

Message Association

Brand Favorability

Purchase Consideration/Intent

Denotes most cost-effective medium for metricDenotes second most cost-effective medium for metric

Aggregate of 10 studies. Source: Dynamic Logic 2009

MYTH > Cutting my magazine budgetWON’T COMPROMISE ad results.

REALITY > Magazines perform best through the purchase funnel,especially in brand favorability and purchase intent

REALITY > Magazines are the most cost-effective medium throughoutthe purchase funnel, looking at two measures of ROI

> Magazines most consistently generate a low cost per impact

> For cost per person, the most efficient media combination always includes magazinesMost Cost Efficient Media Combinations Based on Average Cost per Person

Page 4: Myth Busters: Ad impact, 2009

For more information or to download these charts, go to www.magazine.org/accountability.Cover Photo: 200315774 – 001/photodisc /gettyimages

Media That Trigger an Online Search by Age and GenderMedium (percent) Total M F 18 –24 25 –34 35 –44 45 –54 55+

Magazines 44% 40% 47% 36% 44% 45% 45% 44%

TV/Broadcast 38 40 37 30 39 40 42 38

Newspapers 36 35 36 21 27 33 40 45

Face-to-Face 35 34 36 39 43 38 35 27

TV/Cable 32 35 28 37 42 34 29 23

Radio 27 30 25 22 34 32 29 21

Direct Mail 26 24 28 20 27 27 27 27

E-mail Ads 23 22 23 22 28 24 22 19

Internet Ads 21 23 18 26 26 22 20 15

Online Communities 11 10 12 23 19 12 7 4

Source: BIGresearch, Simultaneous Media Usage Study (SIMM14), June 2009

Magazine digital initiatives cover online and mobile extensions, and include partnerships with companies such as Facebook, Hulu, YouTube and Twitter. Source: MPA Information Center, 2009

2006

2007

2008

2009

Number of Magazine Digital Initiatives Jan-Sept 2006 – 2009% increase

90

169 +88%

197 +17%

254 +29%

Magazines

Newspapers

Radio

Television

Internet

Outdoor

Base: Top quintile of usage for each medium.Source: MRI, Spring 2009

140

84

104

62

175

113

Index Based on Percent of Consumers Using Facebook or MySpace in Last 30 Days

MYTH > Magazines aren’t KEEPING PACEin the digital age.

REALITY > Magazines rank #1 at influencing consumers to start a search online – higher than newer media options

REALITY > Magazines best complement the web in reachingsocial networkers

REALITY > Magazine digital initiatives have increased in double digits every year since 2006