MUNICIPAL JOINT PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT IN INDONESIA The Case of Kartamantul, Jogja Province

MUNICIPAL JOINT PLANNING AND MUNICIPAL JOINT PLANNING AND

MANAGEMENT IN INDONESIAMANAGEMENT IN INDONESIA

The Case of Kartamantul, Jogja Province The Case of Kartamantul, Jogja Province

Wahyudi Kumorotomo, PhD

[email protected]

Master in Public Policy and Administration

Gadjah Mada University

Indonesia

International Workshop on Local Co-Creation and Manpower Policy in Asia,Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto, 14 November 2009

Current Issues in Indonesian Current Issues in Indonesian Municipal Development Municipal Development PlanningPlanning

After decentralization (2001), municipal development plannings are disintegrated by administrative jurisdictions

Problems of externalities in public services

Many initiatives for cross-border cooperations (Barlingmascakep, Gerbangkertosusila, etc.), limited examples of concrete follow-ups

Lack of focus on local issues (transports, waste management, drainage, disaster risk reduction, etc.)

Inability to promote community participation.

Kartamantul Area

Mutual learning; surveys, interviews, hearings, information gathering

Share visions; views, ideas, values and knowledge

Rules and institutions; identify regulations and available options to set up implementing institution

Set up common priorities; ecological development, drainage or retention options, recreational options, flood proof housing, flood safety regulations, economic rules etc.

Joint design; formulate master plans, feasibility studies, organizational design

Implementation; from ideas into actions, distributing responsibilities, carry out tasks

Monitoring and evaluation; actions are monitored, indicators are gauged, and results are evaluated.

Join Planning ApproachJoin Planning Approach

Joint Planning Joint Planning PrinciplesPrinciples

Foresight. Identify and address infrastructure issues according to current and future demands.

Responsiveness. To reduce the lengthy process of planning and implementation.

Co-ordination. To bring together all the stake-holders and formulate solution for common problems.

Judgement. Timely and reasonable decisions, with a sound technical, managerial, financial and contractual considerations.

Role Sharing. To share the costs, tasks, experience, and the risks of municipal policies.

Sectoral CooperationSectoral Cooperation Solid Waste Disposal Management

Sewerage System Management

Resource Water Management

Transport

Road

Drainage

Spatial Integrated Planning.

Philosophy of Philosophy of CooperationCooperation

Care ; a sincere comitment on realistic programs and concrete actions

Share; willingness to share costs, experience, benefits, and risks

Fair; focus on problem solving, “Win-Win Solution”.

Solid Waste Management CooperationSolid Waste Management Cooperation

The Shares of The Shares of

Operational & Maintenance Costs Operational & Maintenance Costs

(Rp)(Rp)

TAHUN YOGYAKARTA SLEMAN BANTUL TOTAL

2001 599.315.100 100.923.900 42.620.600 742.859.600

2002 738.743.348 124.403.380 52.536.149 915.682.877

2003 895.340.064 150.774.056 74.882.580 1.120.996.700

2004 1.035.636.080 174.399.716 86.616.364 1.296.652.160

2005 1.281.383.021 215.784.182 107.171.697 1.604.338.900

2006 1.571.617.344 264.659.480 131.446.176 1.967.723.000

2007 1.789.138.080 301.289.850 149.639.070 2.240.067.000

2008 1.853.113.821 355.260.163 153.626.016 2.362.000.000

2009 1.934.115.000 547.563.000 121.222.000 2.602.900.000

AfterBefore

Impoving PerformanceImpoving Performance

Sewerage System Management Sewerage System Management

CooperationCooperation

Shares of Operational & Shares of Operational &

Maintenance CostsMaintenance Costs

Sewerage Pipe

Development

Sewerage Aeration Instalation

Water Resource Management Water Resource Management

CooperationCooperation

Water Resource Water Resource

ManagementManagement

Water Resource Study

Institution Building

Tarriff

Investment

Public-Private Partnership

16

Road Management CooperationRoad Management Cooperation

Road ManagementRoad Management

Synchronize Planning & Budgeting

Construction & Rehabilitation

Improve quality of Roads & Bridges

Improve public utilities

18

Transport Management CooperationTransport Management Cooperation

Transport ManagementTransport Management

1. Public Transport Reform2. Routes3. Park & Ride 4. Double track railways system5. Hub Station6. Rest Area

Drainage Management CooperationDrainage Management Cooperation

1. Synchronize Planning & Budgeting

2. Quality of Drainage3. Dimension4. Construction5. Dredging Sediment6. Flood Treatment

Drainage Drainage

ManagementManagement

Spatial Management CooperationSpatial Management Cooperation

Spatial ManagementSpatial Management

1. Synchronization of Planning, Budgeting & Controlling

2. Zone Regulation (Recharge, Housing/Settlement, Green Area, Public Space etc)

3. Standardization of Building Permit.

Lesson Learned and Lesson Learned and ChallengesChallenges

1. What is the most successful co-operation and co-creation in “Kartamantul”? Solid Waste Management

2. Next challenge in SWM: • Technology (incinerator, bio-

gas?)• Behavioral change (reduce,

reuse, recycle) 3. Continued delivery of functions

and roles4. Long-term institutional capacity5. Legal & Political Support.

1. Data; No two jurisdiction necessary collect the same information.

2. “Zero-Sum Game”; Local authorities might perceive that benefit goes to an area at the expense of others.

3. Common objectives;It is generally difficult to agree on common objectives.

4. Constituent;No decision-making body has a single constituency.

5. Authority to follow-up agreement;It is difficult to coordinate activities that are not bound by law without sincere mutual agreement.

“Problems of Cross-Border Planning in Multi-State Conurbations” (Meyer, 1997):

Terima KasihArigato Gozaimas