1 Multi- and Interdisciplinary Instruction at PA: Theory, Practice and Constraints Jerry Hagler, Christopher Shaw and Erin Strong Defining “Interdisciplinary” at Andover Teachers at all levels often refer to curriculum that explores content using one or more disciplines as interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary, often interchangeably. In 2012-13, Andover’s dean of studies asked the Academic Council to agree on a definition of interdisciplinarity for use at the academy. The chairs of the departments of theatre and dance, of history and social science, and the head of the division of the natural sciences met during the fall of 2013 in an effort to come to some agreement on this definition, using a combination of published theory and common practice, both at Andover and at other secondary and tertiary institutions. When is a course multidisciplinary? Curriculum that juxtaposes content, analytical methods, or creative techniques from one or more disciplinary traditions is considered representative of more than one “many” discipline(s). Such an approach borrows and sets side-by-side whole texts, tools and vocabularies from two or more disciplines in the presentation of a given topic. A course on a common idea or problem – for example, climate change – might present weekly lectures from a series of experts engaged with the topic who do not, as a rule, seek to define new approaches or integrate the knowledge they bring. Such a course might begin with an ecologist describing eco-systems undergoing change from increasing temperatures, and follow that expert with a geologist speaking about glaciers, then an anthropologist addressing the impact on human communities, an engineer on human infrastructure, and an economist on the long-term costs to national output. …versus interdisciplinary? Heidi Hayes Jacobs at Columbia’s Teachers College emphasizes the integrative quality of interdisciplinarity, the merging of disciplinary understandings into a new form of knowledge. 1 She warns of the “pot pourri” approach, presenting Ancient Egypt, for example, as sequential tastes of relevant history, architecture, and arts, an approach that tends to fail in terms both of rigor and focus. She also describes the “polarity problem,” in which a disciplinary focus is seen as antithetical to interdisciplinary understanding, in which each inhabits its own, exclusive zone of meaning and practice. To remedy these pitfalls, she defines interdisciplinary programs as meeting two essential criteria in design and student experience: ● They must have carefully conceived design features: 1 Heidi Hayes Jacobs ed., Interdisciplinary Curriculum Design and Implementation (Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1989). 1 1
16
Embed
Multiand Interdisciplinary Instruction at PA: Theory, Practice and Constraints
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
Multi- and Interdisciplinary Instruction at PA: Theory,
Practice and Constraints
Jerry Hagler, Christopher Shaw and Erin Strong
Defining “Interdisciplinary” at Andover
Teachers at all levels often refer to curriculum that explores content using one or more disciplines as
interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary, often interchangeably. In 2012-13, Andover’s dean of studies asked
the Academic Council to agree on a definition of interdisciplinarity for use at the academy. The chairs of
the departments of theatre and dance, of history and social science, and the head of the division of the
natural sciences met during the fall of 2013 in an effort to come to some agreement on this definition,
using a combination of published theory and common practice, both at Andover and at other secondary
and tertiary institutions.
When is a course multidisciplinary?
Curriculum that juxtaposes content, analytical methods, or creative techniques from one or more
disciplinary traditions is considered representative of more than one “many” discipline(s). Such an
approach borrows and sets side-by-side whole texts, tools and vocabularies from two or more disciplines
in the presentation of a given topic. A course on a common idea or problem – for example, climate
change – might present weekly lectures from a series of experts engaged with the topic who do not, as a
rule, seek to define new approaches or integrate the knowledge they bring. Such a course might begin
with an ecologist describing eco-systems undergoing change from increasing temperatures, and follow
that expert with a geologist speaking about glaciers, then an anthropologist addressing the impact on
human communities, an engineer on human infrastructure, and an economist on the long-term costs to
national output.
…versus interdisciplinary?
Heidi Hayes Jacobs at Columbia’s Teachers College emphasizes the integrative quality of
interdisciplinarity, the merging of disciplinary understandings into a new form of knowledge.1 She warns
of the “pot pourri” approach, presenting Ancient Egypt, for example, as sequential tastes of relevant
history, architecture, and arts, an approach that tends to fail in terms both of rigor and focus. She also
describes the “polarity problem,” in which a disciplinary focus is seen as antithetical to interdisciplinary
understanding, in which each inhabits its own, exclusive zone of meaning and practice.
To remedy these pitfalls, she defines interdisciplinary programs as meeting two essential criteria in design
and student experience:
● They must have carefully conceived design features:
1 Heidi Hayes Jacobs ed., Interdisciplinary Curriculum Design and Implementation (Association for
Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1989). 1 1
2
○ a scope and sequence,
○ a cognitive taxonomy to encourage thinking skills,
○ behavioral indicators of attitudinal change, and2
○ a solid evaluation scheme.
● They must use both discipline-field-based and interdisciplinary experiences for students in the
curriculum.3
Jacobs goes on to emphasize the need for epistemology at all levels of instruction – “How do we know
what we know? What is knowledge?” – as well as the quality that successful interdisciplinary approaches
not only depend on disciplines and discipline-based knowledge and methodology, but also enhance
relevance and reduce fragmentation, rather than the other way around.
More recently, Repko, Szestak and Buchberger describe interdisciplinary studies as those that “cross”
disciplinary boundaries and seek to integrate knowledge in a new way, citing as examples “neuroscience
and biochemistry…[ ] environmental science, nanotechnology, geobiology, sustainability science and
engineering, psycholinguistics, ethnomusicology, cultural studies, women’s studies, urban studies, and
American studies.”
They propose a definition consistent with Jacobs, emphasizing process, disciplines, integration and the
more comprehensive understanding that emerges, describing interdisciplinary as the smoothie to
multidisciplinary’s bowl of fruit:
“Interdisciplinary studies is a process of answering a question, solving a
problem, or addressing a topic that is too broad or complex to be dealt with
adequately by a single discipline, and draws on the disciplines with the goal of
integrating their insights to construct a more comprehensive understanding.[3]
Examples of Multidisciplinary and Interdisciplinary Teaching at
Phillips Academy
Multidisciplinary
Teaching models:
● “Portable” Teaching Units: Individual class units taught by museum instructors from the Addison
or the Peabody on a guest lecture basis. These are in common use in many courses throughout
the curriculum (see Appendix A). An example might include a history course that visits the
Addison for one or two class session to examine a topic at hand through the lens of visual art.
● Guest lectures: A teacher invites a colleague from another department to lecture once or twice
per trimester.
2 Ibid., 3.
2 3 Allen F. Repko, Rick Szostak and Michelle Phillips Buchberger, Introduction to Interdisciplinary Studies
(Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2013). 3 3
3
● Single topic across several courses: Examination of a particular topic through consideration in
multiple courses.
○ South Africa Art Project - each of three arts -- music, visual art & dance -- will examine
the same topic from a different lens;
○ THDA 320,321, 920 (Costume, Light, Play Production) while collaborative in nature, each
remains distinct -- the costume class examines the theme through costume design,
actors from a performing stance, sound design, light design, etc.; all are separate lenses
to examine the same theme;
● Single topic across several disciplines or angles in one course: One overarching topic is
considered by faculty from multiple departments (or even within a single department) from
multiple angles on a short-term basis (one or two class sessions):
○ IP Colloquium (Dylan; Justice, Tyranny and Law; London); (none is truly an IP, but that is
for the Advising Council to decide since it approves IPs)
○ THDA 370 Performance Art: The Creative Self
○ English 530AA When I Paint My Masterpiece
○ English 542AA An Intro Survey of African American Lit
○ Hist-SS500 American Pop Culture
○ Biol-430 The Root of It All: Plants in the Modern World
Interdisciplinary
Teaching models:
● Two+ instructors from distinct departments teach one course (~double course enrollment)
○ Engl- 533GL, Phre-533 and Phre-550 Abbot Global Scholars (although in the course
description this course is described as multidisciplinary, the description itself suggests
that this course is actually interdisciplinary)
○ Eng/Musc-530 Brazilian Cultural Studies
○ Hist-SS/Scie-480 History of Disease and Medicine in the United States: Pox and
Pestilence
○ Hist-SS/Musc-485 Out of Tune: Music and the State in the Twentieth Century
○ Intd-410 Academy Hill: A Sense of Place
○ Phre/Scie-445 Bioethics: Humanity in the Post-Genomic Era
○ Psyc/Scie-490 The Brain and You--A Users Guide
○ Scie-470 Human Origins
● Single instructor teaching one course (interdisciplinary approach to topic, using guest speakers
bringing particular expertise)
○ Scie-410 Environmental Science: Global Climate Change
○ Scie-420 Environmental Science: Agriculture, and the Future
○ Scie-430 Environmental Science: Water Resources
○ Scie-435 Love That Dirty Water: The Global Sanitation Challenge
○ Scie-460 Molecular Gastronomy
○ Span-620 Commerce, Culture, and Trade: Modern Latin America
○ Musical Play Productions (are both multi and inter)
○ Art-400 Histories of Art
○ Art-465 Cultural Perspectives, Global Connections
○ Musc-410 The Musical Brain
4
Examples of multi- and interdisciplinary courses at other private high
schools
Several of our peer schools include inter- or multidisciplinary courses in their course catalogs. Here you
will find a round-up of prominent offerings from a selection of these schools, as determined through a
search of school websites and/or course catalogs for the terms “interdisciplinary” and “multi-disciplinary”
(or some variation).
A. Courses that have descriptions that include the word multi- or interdisciplinary, or that are
clearly multi- or interdisciplinary in nature (even if not listed as such):
Phillips Exeter Academy4:
While the Exeter course catalog does not specifically offer courses labeled as multi- or interdisciplinary,
they do offer courses that appear to have characteristics of both:
● ENG461: ART OF PROTEST--the course description mentions that this is an interdisciplinary
course.
● The Exeter course catalog includes an entire section dedicated to Senior Studies, a set of
courses that “encourage students to make connections across disciplinary lines and to utilize
skills they have developed in different disciplines.” Courses include:
○ SRS406: SUSTAINABILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP
○ SRS411: THE WORLD SEEN THROUGH A DAILY NEWSPAPER
○ SRS412: HUMAN RIGHTS
○ SRS425: THE BLACK EXPERIENCE IN WHITE AMERICA I
○ SRS426: THE BLACK EXPERIENCE IN WHITE AMERICA II
○ SRS440: EL TANGO ARGENTINO – HISTORY, MUSIC & DANCE
○ SRS448: SPORTS SCIENCE
○ SRS449: BEST-SELLING SCIENCE
○ SRS451: SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND PROFIT IN SOCIETIES
○ SRS453: INFORMATION AND CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY
Deerfield Academy5
The Deerfield course catalog does not have a section dedicated to inter- or multidisciplinary studies.
However, several courses do mention interdisciplinarity in the course description. We’ve indicated the
specific areas of interdisciplinarity as well as the teaching method if indicated.
● ENG311 American Studies (American Literature and US History)
● ENG313 American Styles (English and Visual Arts)
● HIS122 Africa and Latin America
● HIS311 His: American Studies (US History and American Literature, team-taught)
● HIS443 India and China: 2.5B and Change
Deerfield is a participant in the AP Cambridge Capstone Program
(http://aphighered.collegeboard.org/exams/cambridge-capstone) and offers two courses designed
specifically to fit into the AP Cambridge program, both of which are described as being interdisciplinary in
nature:
● ENG492 AP Cambridge: Capstone Research
● HIS349 AP Cambridge: Global H2O
Milton Academy6
Offers one interdisciplinary course, AOIOH-Advanced Oral Interpretation: Oral History, team taught by faculty from performing arts and history. Other courses include the term “interdisciplinary” or “multi-disciplinary” in the course description:
● SP4CL-Spanish 4: Topics in Hispanic Culture and Literature: Mexico Yesterday and Today
● FR5WS- French 5: The Francophone World
B. Course catalog includes a section dedicated to interdisciplinary courses:
Choate Rosemary Hall7
The Choate website includes a section outlining its curriculum (including a listing of all courses). Under
this curriculum is a heading labeled Interdisciplinary which includes a definition of interdisciplinary
courses as: “courses specifically designed to incorporate subject matter from two or more disciplines.”
They include the following courses under this heading:
● Environ Research Project, Honors ● Evolution: Darwin's Dangerous Idea ● Greening of America: Environmental Movem ● Introduction To Logic ● Introductory Classical Chinese, Honors ● Islamic Civilizations of The Middle East ● Modernism, Honors ● Post-Modernism, Honors ● Public Speaking ● Research Methods, Honors ● Romanticism, Honors ● Seminar In Art History, Honors ● Sophomore Seminar ● Sustainable International Development
Lawrenceville Academy8
Lawrenceville maintains a section of its course catalog dedicated to interdisciplinary study, described as:
“The interdisciplinary studies program at Lawrenceville is not a separate department, but a series of courses that emerge from our core disciplines of history, science, English, foreign language, art, and religion and philosophy.
Beginning in the Second Form, students become familiar with the insights, methods, and approaches of these core disciplines. Interdisciplinary courses then attempt to build on these disciplinary groundings in the Fourth and Fifth Form by encouraging students to integrate two or
6 “Milton Academy” http://www.milton.edu/
7 “Choate Rosemary Hall” http://www.choate.edu/
8 “The Lawrenceville School” http://www.lawrenceville.org/
more disciplines. Increasingly, the most complex intellectual and practical problems in the world lie beyond the boundaries of a single discipline. As such, the goal of the Interdisciplinary courses is to answer a question, solve a problem, or achieve an understanding impossible through a single discipline alone. At Lawrenceville, we specifically define Interdisciplinary Studies as “Inquiries which critically draw up two or more disciplines leading to an integration of disciplinary insights.”
● “Inquiries”: Interdisciplinary Courses should focus on a question or a problem that requires analysis from multiple disciplinary perspectives.
● “Which Critically Draw Upon Two or More Disciplines”: Interdisciplinary Courses should emerge from our core Departments and the disciplinary groundings students have acquired during their first two to three years at Lawrenceville. The purpose of Interdisciplinary Courses is to leverage the insights of two or more disciplines while also encouraging students to reflect critically on the limitations of each discipline.
● “Leading to an Integration of Disciplinary Insights”: Once a course's essential question is examined from the perspective of the contributing disciplines -- and each discipline reaches the limits of its explanatory or problem-solving power.
Interdisciplinary courses should then become a search for a "third way" -- a strategy that builds on
the insights and approaches of the contributing disciplines, but then "integrates" them in the service of answering a question, solving a problem, or achieving an understanding impossible through a single discipline alone.”
The following is a list of courses that grant interdisciplinary credit:
● EN414 – European‐ American English II ● EN417 – Legal Practice And Procedures ● EN517 – Ex Nihilo: Postmodern Literature ● EN517 – Ex Nihilo: Postmodern Literature ● EN549 – Linguistics: Dr. Johnson To Dr. Chomsky ● EN573 – Heuristics ● HI506 – Women & Poverty in the Developing World ● HI516 – Russia: History and Memory ● HI563 – European‐ American History I ● HI570 – Africa: Then and Now ● HI578 – The Middle East ‐ Myth And History ● HI592 – Immigration Stories/Theories I ● IN586 – Interdisciplinary: Capstone X [Health Care] ● IN588 – Interdisciplinary: Capstone [Health Care] ● LA563 – Honors French: Versailles ● LA592 – Honors Spanish: Politics & Poetry ● MA507 – Honors Calculus AB with Physics ● MA535 – Honors Math Seminar: Infinity ● PA506 – Popular Music In America ● PA522 – Reason & Faith: Brecht’s “Galileo” ● RP401 – Varieties‐ Religious Experience ● RP502 – The Karma Of Words ● RP504 – Religious Dimens Of Music ● RP505 – Religion And Ecology ● RP506 – Heresy: Philosophy, Religion, & Science ● RP508 – Religion In America I ● RP511 – Makers Modern Mind I ● SC531 – Honors Physics With Calculus ● SC570 – Bioethics ● SC583 – Race ● SC591 – Food
7
● VA507 – Time, Space & Light: The 20th Century ● VA511 – Design For Social Change
Also described as an interdisciplinary course in the course description but not listed as giving Interdisciplinary credit: LA549 – Honors Latin: Shakespeare. Hotchkiss
9 Maintains a section in its Course Listing labeled “Interdisciplinary Courses” and includes:
● IC352 – EPISTEMOLOGY: A THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE ● HU150 – PREP HUMANITIES (1500-1815) ● HU250 – LOWER MID HUMANITIES (1815-PRESENT)
According to the course description, both HU150 and HU250 contains sections in English, history, philosophy and religion, and the arts (visual art, dance, music, photography, theatre). The following courses are also described as being interdisciplinary:
● SC441 – INTRODUCTION TO FORENSIC SCIENCE ● ES421 – ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS (cross listed with humanities and social sciences)
C. Schools that integrate interdisciplinary studies into the core curriculum:
Lawrence Academy10
9th Grade Program From the Lawrence Academy Course of Study:
“Students are taught by a team of four teachers—one from the arts, one from science, one from English, and one from history. Classes focus on teaching the skills using content material from the various disciplines in an interdisciplinary approach, thus encouraging students to make connections and to draw on shared experiences. The NGP offers a new approach to interdisciplinary learning by proposing that skills, not facts, unite the disciplines.” This program consists of four courses as listed in the catalog:
● Ninth Grade Arts Program-100 ● Ninth Grade English Program-201 ● Ninth Grade History Program-603 ● Ninth Grade Science Program-500
Several courses are also described as multidisciplinary:
11 NMH has a required interdisciplinary Humanities Program. It consists of three parts:
● 9th graders are required to take Environmental Perspectives (HUM 001 : Humanities I: Environmental Perspectives), a course that combines English with religious studies and is collaboratively taught by faculty from both departments;
● New 10th graders are required (and returning 10th grade are permitted) to take International Perspectives (HUM 002 : Humanities II: International Perspectives), a course that combines
9 “The Hotchkiss School” http://www.hotchkiss.org/
10 “Lawrence Academy” http://www.lacademy.edu/
11 “Northfield Mount Hermon School” http://www.nmhschool.org/
history with religious studies. This course is also taught by collaborating faculty from both history and religious studies.
● Upper level humanities course offerings include courses that are described to integrate two disciplines together. Examples include:
○ HIS/ENG 003 : The Civil War and American Memory ○ REL/HIS 6 : Global Futures
Other courses that include the term “interdisciplinary” in the course description:
● INT 073 : International Studies Program: New Zealand ● ENV 411 : Environmental Studies ● ENV 511 : Advanced Placement Environmental Science ● Senior Seminars
Other courses that are listed in two departments and are likely inter- or multidisciplinary in nature:
● BIO/REL 1 : Genetics and Ethics ● REL/HIS 2 : The Islamic Middle East ● HIS 311LM/Eng 311LM : Shared Voices: Multicultural US History and American
Literature ● REL/HIS 2 : The Islamic Middle East
These courses offer credit in two or more departments, implying a strong interdisciplinary component:
● HUM 211BR : Humanities II: Brazil (offers credit in history, religious studies and math--includes a travel component)
● HUM 211SA : Humanities II: South Africa (offers credit in history, religious studies and English--includes a travel component)
● HUM211CH : Humanities II: China (offers credit in history, religious studies and math--includes a travel component)
● HUM 211IN : Humanities II: India (unclear where the credits go--includes a travel component)
Phillips Academy
12 Note: A similar analysis of the Phillips Academy webpage and course of study yields the following results: A section of our course of study “Interdisciplinary Science” includes:
● SCIE-445/PHRE-445, Bioethics: Humanity in the Post-Genomic Era ● SCIE-490, The Brain and You: a User's Guide ● SCIE-480, Disease and Medicine in the United States: Pox and Pestilence ● SCIE-470, Human Origins ● SCIE-435, Love That Dirty Water: the Global Sanitation Challenge ● SCIE-430, Env. Science: Water Resources ● SCIE-420, Env. Sci : Food,agriculture & the Future ● SCIE-410, Env. Science: Global Climate Change ● SCIE-460, Molecular Gastronomy
Several courses (not already listed above) include the word “interdisciplinary” in the course description. These include:
● ART-302, Clay and the Ancestral Pot ● ENGL-511CC, The World in Pieces: Cinema, Poetry, And the Aesthetics of
Fragmentation ● ENGL-530AA, When I Paint My Masterpiece
● ENGL-534YO, Yoga: Poetry and Practice ● INTD-410, Academy Hill: a Sense of Place
Interestingly, there are several courses that are included in the hard copy course of study under the heading “Interdisciplinary Studies.” The “Interdisciplinary Studies” category is not included in the online version of the COS (which obviously should be fixed). Courses that should be included under this heading:
● HIST-SS485/MUSC-485, Out of Tune: Music and the State in the Twentieth Century ● ENGL-530AB/MUSC-530, Brazilian Cultural Studies ● ENGL-533GL/2/PHRE-533, Abbot Global Scholars: Encounters ● PHRE-550, Abbot Global Scholars: Connections ● HIST-SS-480/SCIE-480, Disease and Medicine in the United States: Pox and Pestilence ● PHRE-445/SCIE-445, Bioethics: Humanity in the Post-Genomic Era ● SCIE-490/PSYC-490, The Brain and You--A User’s Guide ● INTD-410, Academy Hill: A Sense of Place ● INTD-400/1: Humanities Writing Seminar
Obstacles associated with the development of inter- and
multidisciplinary courses at PA
Ways to promote inter- and multidisciplinary course development:
Historically, faculty and department chairs who have been interested in developing inter/multi-disciplinary
courses have encountered several problems that prevent the easy development of such courses. We
have divided these problems into the following general categories: Structural, Territorial, Work Load, and
Financial, with a discussion of each following. This is in no way meant to be a comprehensive analysis of
this issue, but should serve to highlight the major problems that have been encountered (and some of the
solutions that have been adopted) in the development of inter-/multi-disciplinary courses.
Structural—the structure of the school and the curriculum interferes with interdisciplinary collaboration.
Problem #1: Difficult to schedule faculty such that they can both teach during any one period.
Possible solutions:
● Use the ad hoc method we already employ. Rely on the primary faculty for that interdisciplinary
course to invite and schedule their guest lecturers for mutually convenient times, but with
expressed support from the administration.
i. Advantages: requires no changes in mentality or structure on the part of the school,
and can also be very flexible.
ii. Disadvantages: Limiting. Also, this model doesn’t really encourage more in depth
collaboration between faculty.
● Creative scheduling and use of time
a. More extensive use of 9th period. 4x75 minute periods (4:50-6:05) are available.
i. Advantages: Great deal of flexibility for both faculty and teachers. Most faculty do not
10
teach in 9th period, and most students do not have classes here either. Meet for dinner.
ii. Disadvantages: Hard on the family life for some of us who have young kids.
Not a popular time for students to have class?
In recent years several courses have been offered during 9th period:
● Art-301/401/501/601 Architecture
● Biol-430 Root of It All
● Biol-610 Molecular and Cellular Biology: Independent Laboratory Research
● Comp-630 Honors Computer Science Seminar
Enrollments in 9th period sections have varied. In Winter term 2014, both Art-
301/401/501 and Comp-630 have full enrollment. Over the two years we offered Biol-
430, it never filled completely.
b. Use athletics and community service time for additional course time
i. Advantages: Opens up yet another block of time that can be utilized for specialized
course work.
ii. Disadvantages: Encroaches on time set aside specifically for athletics and community
service….major league taboo?
We already have the structure in place to support the use of afternoons for other courses.
The athletics department offers Flexible Fitness Option, Supervised Approved Sports
Exemption and Independent Exercise Options to improve flexibility in how students can
use afternoon hours. These options have been used by students to pursue course work
outside of the normal school day. An example would include some students in Biol-610.
No doubt there are others as well.
c. Institute class meeting times utilize multiple period times. For example, one colleague
teaches
his/her part of the course during regular periods 1-7, the collaborating faculty, due to scheduling
conflicts, utilizes 9th period (or athletic/com service time) for his/her component of the course.
Thus, students might meet in a course for one or more period in periods 1-7, and also for one or
more periods in period 9.
i. Advantages: Great deal of flexibility for scheduling. Students who want to enroll in
such a class that requires this kind of flexibility would only need to set aside one period
during the normal class day to enroll. The other part of the course would exist in a lightly
utilized portion of the schedule (period 9).
ii. Disadvantages: Clutters up the daily and weekly schedule. Clouds up a lot of the
clarity achieved with the new class schedule. Also potentially conflicts with athletic
commitments, especially during Winter term
.
d. Parallel scheduling of multiple sections of one course. For example, if we combine Human
Genetics and Bioethics into one course, we would schedule two sections of this course for the
same period. They would meet separately and be taught by one of the two faculty heading the
course. These faculty would switch sections on some sort of predetermined schedule so that
they could each get to interact with each section at least during half of the available class time. In
effect, each section would get half science/half ethics instruction.
i. Advantages: Faculty do not need to learn whole new subject areas outside their area
11
of expertise in order to teach the class. The collaborating faculty would cover that area.
For example, I teach the science of Human Genetics issues to both sections, Vincent
teaches ethical issues to both sections. Both teachers are teaching separately during the
same period for the whole term. They are both in effect teaching one course each and
thus there are no FTE issues.
ii. Disadvantages: How do we assign credits for the course? The students essentially
get one half of a course in one discipline, and half a course in the other. Do they get
discipline credit for either, both or neither? Also, enrolling enough students for two
sections worth of one elective course in one period may be a problem.
e. Use combined periods to teach, as we do with Bio 600 (6th and 7
th period combined together
to make an 8 hour course).
i. Advantages: Yet more flexibility. A course that uses, say, period 3 and 4 together
can have faculty teaching that course who also have another course during one of those
two combined periods. This works best if one faculty can have one of the two periods
dedicated to the interdisciplinary course, and the other collaborating faculty has the
complimentary period dedicated. This model results in less scheduling woes for the
department head.
ii. Disadvantages: Results in scheduling restrictions for both the student and the
scheduling officer.
f. Coscheduling faculty: departments cooperate to co-schedule collaborating faculty so that they
can co-teach their interdisciplinary course in the same period.
i. Advantages: Neat and tidy way to deal with common teaching time
ii. Disadvantages: Serious FTE issue. How do we allocate FTEs? Also, full course time
blocked out for a faculty member who essentially teaches during only half of that time,
resulting in inefficient use of teaching time (from the point of view of the department
chair). Other issues?
g. Schedule the course at an odd time when all faculty can participate.This technique has been
used to support the teaching of the IP colloquium courses (Dylan, Justice, Law and Tyranny,
London) which are all taught on Wednesday evening after dinner for a two-hour block. This does
seem to be a workable model. All of these courses were heavily enrolled and drew on the
resources of a great variety of faculty. Each faculty member was only asked to teach one
evening a term. Only the course head met with the class every week.
Problem #2: How do departments handle introduction of new interdisciplinary courses without incurring
“Course of Study bloat?” In which departments should truly interdisciplinary courses be included? Do we
need more flexibility in the structure of our curriculum to accommodate new courses? What is the role of
the newly created Andover Institute?
Consider:
● Deliberately consider interdisciplinary courses to be, by default, temporary, so that they run for
only a few years (perhaps 4 years at the max). This model would allow new courses to pop in to
place to replace the old, keeping the curriculum of the school dynamic, exciting and current.
● Create a set number of interdisciplinary course slots available every year that are filled by
interested faculty. Perhaps faculty can compete for these slots.
● Each department has a set number course slots available for new or changing courses (not just
12
for ID courses). These can be allocated as the department wishes for next school year in time for
the deadline for Course of Study changes in January. As courses wither and die, and faculty
priorities change, these course slots can change as well
● Interested faculty can have designated course slots of their own that they can modify form year to
year.
● Place interdisciplinary/multi-disciplinary courses under the banner of the Andover Institute, free of
departmental constraint. However, how would such a structure be coordinated with the interested
departments?
● Other Ideas?
Problem #3: How do we get students to take these courses, especially if they are running at odd times
(as described above)?
● In recent experience, this does not seem to be much of a problem. Most of the interdisciplinary
courses we offer appear to be well subscribed. Even courses offered at odd time, such as the IP
colloquium have been popular. Also, the credit students receive for interdisciplinary courses
needs to be addressed. Recent experience has shown that if courses are offered out of two
departments, and are listed in both departments, students can be given the choice of department
in which to receive credit. That model has worked well with
○ Hist-SS480/Scie-480
○ Psyc-490/Scie-490
○ Hist-SS485/Musc-485
○ Engl-533GL/2/Phre-533
○ Hist-SS485/Musc-485
○ Phre-445/Scie-445.
This remains a problem for courses that cannot be easily fit within the departmental structure.
Problem #4: How do we manage who gets to do interdisciplinary work…..all faculty, first-come-first-
served, competitively chosen, an elite few?
Territorial—Faculty tend to be territorial with their courses, not wanting to share their space and their
student time with anyone else. We don’t know the extent of this problem. It does seem faculty are
generally reluctant to ask other faculty to give guest lectures in their classes (especially intra-
departmentally, at least in the sciences--). Here are some points to consider when thinking about this
issue:
Why are we as a faculty generally reluctant to allow or seek outside participation in our courses? (By
outside, we mean outside of the actual course, but from within their department or from another
department…..it is clear that people already utilize speakers from outside the school)
Possible answers:
● The culture of the school such that we are afraid of imposing on other faculty by asking them to
participate in our courses due to perceived time constraints. A guest lecture requires prep time,
class time, hassle, etc. Yet another thing that needs to be done in the course of a very busy daily
schedule.
● It is too much of a hassle to arrange.
13
● Ego issues part 1……are we afraid of being “out done” by our guest lecturer? Will we find that
we are not as good teachers as we thought in comparison to others?
● Ego issues part 2……we feel that we are better at teaching a subject, have more knowledge
about a subject, etc, than other faculty members. Therefore, we do not need to invite guest
lecturers.
● Intellectual issues.
i. Will we be challenged by our students and the guest lecturer beyond our comfort level?
ii. Are faculty really even interested in other fields of study to the point where they would
like to invite guests or establish collaborations for a new course?
● Duration of the term might be too short to allow guest lecturers (in other words, courses contain
too much content that needs to be covered in a limited amount of time). This is probably really a
problem for AP/AP-level courses.
● The use of a lot of guest lecturers might be perceived as “slacking off” on your teaching duties by
the rest of the department or by the rest of the school.
Should faculty offer to give guest lectures for specific classes or departments? For example, should
Hagler, a molecular biologist, offer to give lectures in Chemistry classes about enzymes (biological
catalysts), or perhaps about the issues surrounding stem cell research for Bioethics? Making such an
offer may be one way to facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration. Here are the problems we see with such
an approach:
● All of the issues outlined above under B1.
● The person who does this looks like an “ego-maniac”.
● The person who does this might be perceived as encroaching on another faculty member’s
“personal teaching space” and intellectual homebase.
● others?
Are there ways that inter-course collaboration can be encouraged by the department heads and by the
administration?
● Comp time for course development?
Workload—both positive and negative pressures—Co-teaching tends to generate problems with FTEs.
Two (or more) faculty teaching one course results in inefficient use of teaching time from a departmental
point of view (one teacher using half their time for a course for which they get full 0.2 FTE credit).
Possible solutions:
● Don’t give teachers full credit, but instead, assign proportional credit (0.1 FTE each for two
teacher course, etc). This would encourage additional collaborations by teachers of
interdisciplinary courses (so that they can bring themselves up to full FTE workload with
additional courses).
● Don’t worry about it and just take the hit. Sure, there is a loss of efficiency, but that might be the
cost for maintaining the school at the vanguard of competitive private high schools.
● “Double” enrollment in the course. This way each instructor is teaching the equivalent of a full
section worth of students. There are several courses that use this solution currently: Hist-
SS480/Scie-480, Psyc/Scie-490, Scie-470 all accept an enrollment of at least 22 students (~11
students/instructor). This solution has been an acceptable compromise for courses of this type
for several years.
14
Having other faculty come and teach lectures (as in the current informal model of interdisciplinary
courses) in a course reduces workload for the main teacher of that course.
This, we think, on the whole is a positive thing. But, do we need to account for that? If so, how should
the school account for that? We need to be careful not to penalize people for dreaming and planning
interdisciplinary work.
Utilize resources outside the bounds of the formal academic program of Phillips Academy
● Utilize the resources of the two Museums and other offices.
○ Robert S. Peabody Museum of Archaeology, which offers extensive curriculum units
expressly for use in the academic program that can be delivered to classes by the RSP
education staff (see appendix A);
○ Addison Museum of American Art (see appendix B)
○ Archives
○ OWHL
All four of these resources have been used successfully in a variety of academic courses over the
past several years. This does appear to be a valuable way to introduce multi- and
interdisciplinary themes into the academic program
Financial—How do we pay for interdisciplinary work?
There is probably a need for financial resources to cover faculty time spent in planning (summer or over
the course of the year), books and other resources, guest speakers, travel, etc. Should the school expect
this to come out of the pocket of the faculty involved, from the department, or from somewhere else?
One possible solution is the establishment of an endowment or some other pool of money available to
support interdisciplinary work (such as existed for the Medicine and Society Project). Curriculum and
faculty development money from the Dean of Studies and the Dean of Faculty may be good resources for
this as well. It may be that existing resources remain largely unknown or under-utilized.
Appendix A
Curriculum Units:
Robert S. Peabody Museum of Archaeology
The education staff at the Robert S. Peabody Museum of Archaeology offers the following curriculum
units for use in appropriate courses. These units are taught by the museum educators, often utilizing
items directly from the museum collections.
It’s aMAIZEing!
The Ancient Maya
Andean Textiles *
Anthropology of Gender *
Archiving the Light – The Importance of Photography in the Scientific Process
Astronomy of the Ancestral Puebloans at Chaco Canyon
Astronomy of the Ancient Maya
“As you are now, so once was I” – Changes in religious ideology as revealed at Andover’s
15
South Church Burial Ground
The Atlatl – An Ancient Hunting and Warfare Device
Blubber: It’s What’s For Dinner
Bones to Beethoven: Music in the Archaeological Record
A Brave New Ceremony
Cave, Earth, & Sky: The Animate Landscape of Ancient Mesoamerica
The Corn Conundrum*
The Countdown to 2012
Cultures in Contact
Death as Fashion: 18th and 19th Century Gravestone Style Change at Andover’s South Church Burial
Ground
Deforestation……with Stone Age Tools?
Ethnobotany: How People Use Plants *
Etowah *
Fantastic Archaeology*
First Peoples of the Americas
Forensic Anthropology
Fur Trade in the 17 th and 18 th Centuries
Going Viral
Hellish Fiends and Brutish Men
History in Our Own Backyard – An Architectural Tour of Andover
History of Halloween
Hominid Cranial Morphology
How Humans and Sugar Glucose
Human Osteology & Forensics of an 18th Century Execution
Indigenous Ceramics of the Americas *
Intro to Andean & Mesoamerica Precolumbian Art & Culture
Journey to the Underworld – The Ancient Maya Myth of the Hero Twins
Making Stones Tools – The Art of Flint Knapping
Mandan *
The Mark of Cane: A History of the Sugar Industry in America
Mathematics and Calendrics of the Ancient Maya
Mesoamerican Religion – Death, Deities, and the Afterlife
The Mexican Day of the Dead, El Día de los Muertos
Mimbres Pottery *
Mother Nature Knows Best
NAGPRA and Early American Human Remains – A Debate
NAGPRA Explained
Objects and Meaning in Portable Art
Origin and Tenacity of “Race” *
The Origins of Chocolate
The Origins of Writing
Paddling through the Americas
Pecos Pueblo
Phillips Academy’s Great Auk *
Points, Plants and People
Pseudomorphs
The Shell: 500 Million Years of Inspired Design*
16
Statistics: It’s a Sherd Thing
Stone’s Throw: Evidence of Agriculture
Sustaining the Dead: Ancestor Worship, Curation, and Interaction in Mesoamerica
Tarps
That Which Sets US Apart *
Time and Tradition: Ancient Mesoamerican Social and Political Structure from the
Olmec to Aztec
The Trail Where They Cried
Trebuchet!
U.S. Indian Policy and Tribal Land Tenure: The Dawes Act
Up in Smoke: A History of Tobacco *
The ‘Ways’ of the Ancients Live On: La Continuidad Cultural en el Mundo Maya
Westward Expansion
What is Archaeology?
When Strangers Meet
Writing of the Ancient Maya
You’ve Got Mail!
The Addison Gallery of American Art
The Addison Gallery of American Art offers portfolio guides, which suggest works of art derived from the
Addison collections organized thematically for use in the academic program: