Multi-Manager is it worth the hassle? Peter Fitzgerald CFA
Feb 22, 2016
Multi-Manageris it worth the hassle?
Peter Fitzgerald CFA
Index
• What is Multi-Manager• The Challenges• Active v Passive• Asset Allocation v Manager Selection• Manager Selection• Blending• Costs/Benefit
What is Multi-Manger
Overall Portfolio
Manager ZInstitution A
Manager YInstitution B
Manager XInstitution C
Why Multi-Manger
Fund/Manager selection is not easy
Monitoring is time consuming
Blending is not straightforward
Regulatory pressuresRetail Distribution Review (RDR)
The Challenges
Funds: 27000+
Quoted stocks: 624 in UK
Source: Morningstar & Bloomberg
Active Management can work
Asset Allocation v Manager Selection
90% of relative returns do not come from asset allocation
Manager Selection:Can’t do it on the cheap
The sources of manager selection risk
Risk Exposure Style Bias Luck Skill
Financial LeverageBeta LeverageConcentration of Returns
Growth / Value BiasSmall Cap BiasSector Bets
Manager InterviewsUnique InsightsTeam / Process
Success Going ForwardTeam Continuity
Quantitative Qualitative
Quant/Historical PerformancePeer Group Annualised
returnCumulative return Alpha Annualised
Fund 3yr (to end of 2011) Second Quartile 17.62 62.73 0.24
Benchmark (to end of 2011) - 17.00 60.15 0.00
Rolling alphaRolling 12 Month Alpha vs MSCI EM NR (3 yr to end of 2011)
2010 2011
12.50
10.00
7.50
5.00
2.50
0.00
-2.50
-5.00
Investment Name
Source: Morningstar Direct
Quant/Historical Performance
Fund 3 yr (to end of Sep 12)
Third Quartile 3.56 11.07 (1.86)
Benchmark (to end of Sep 12)
- 5.30 16.75 0.00
Rolling AlphaRolling 12 Month Alpha vs MSCI EM NR (3 yr to end of Sep 12)
2010 2011 2012
0.75
0.00
-0.75
-1.50
-2.25
-3.00
-3.75
-4.50
Investment Name
Source: Morningstar Direct
Manager Selection
• Robust framework for:– Selecting– Monitoring– Replacing
The 6Ps
Blending Mangers
Blending Mangers
Traditional Blending
Small Cap Growth
Large Cap Growth Large Cap Value
Small Cap Value
Alternative Blending
LT stock picking stock trading
LT macro rotation
Turnover
Allocation Effect / Selection Effect
100% 150% 200%50%
Cost/Benefit
0.25
0.250.6
0.1
Costs
Manager SelectionAsset AllocationUnderlying ManagerOther
Some Examples