Page 1
LAPPEENRANTA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
Faculty of Technology
New Packaging Solutions
Tomi Juutilainen
Multi-axis solutions in packaging machines in Europe
Examiners: Ph.D, Professor Henry Lindell
Dr.Sc (Eng), Professor Juha Varis
Supervisor: Key Account Support Manager Gert-Jan Nijmolen
Page 2
TIIVISTELMÄ
Lappeenrannan teknillinen yliopisto
Teknillinen tiedekunta
New Packaging Solutions
Tomi Juutilainen
Multi-axis solutions in packaging machines in Europe
Diplomityö
2013
87 sivua, 27 kuvaa, 8 taulukkoa ja 10 liitettä
Tarkastajat: Professori Henry Lindell
Professori Juha Varis
Hakusanat: Automaatio, liikkeenohjaus, moniakselikäyttö, pakkauskone
Työn tarkoituksena oli selvittää moniakselisovellusten markkinapotentiaali Euroopassa
valmistetuissa pakkauskoneissa. Tässä tutkimuksessa moniakselisovellus tarkoittaa
kokoonpanoa, missä tehonsyöttö on toteutettu DC syöttösillalla eri akseliohjaimille ja
ohjausäly on keskitetty yhteen muita ohjaavaan yksikköön. Markkinapotentiaalin
selvitykseen käytettiin pakkauskoneautomaatiotutkimusta. Tutkimus tarkastelee
Euroopassa myytyjen ja valmistettujen pakkauskoneiden kustannusrakennetta
tuoteryhmittäin. Tuoteryhmien tarkempaa erittelyä ja moniakselisovellusten suhdeluvun
löytämistä varten käytettiin arviointia sekä globaalia liikkeenohjaustutkimusta.
Moniakselisovellusten suhdeluvulla pystyttiin arvioimaan missä maassa ja
pakkauskonesektorissa on suurin markkinapotentiaali. Tutkimusten lisäksi
pakkausalalle suunnatuilla yrityshaastatteluilla pyrittiin keräämään tietoa
pakkauskoneiden nykytilanteesta sekä mahdollisista kehityssuuntauksista.
Suurimmat markkinapotentiaalit löytyvät Saksasta ja Italiasta, mitkä ovat suurimmat
pakkauskonevalmistajat Euroopassa. Merkittävintä kasvua Euroopan alueella seuraavan
2-3 vuoden aikana ilmenee Turkissa, missä vuosittainen kasvu pakkausteollisuudessa on
lähes samalla tasolla kuin keskimääräinen koneenrakennuksen kasvu Aasiassa.
Pohjoismaista suurin markkinapotentiaali on Ruotsissa, mikä ylsi 35 sijalle vertailussa.
Yrityshaastattelujen perusteella automaatiokomponentit tulevat lähivuosina pysymään
saman tehoisina, eikä akselimäärissä ole näkyvissä muutosta. Integroidut
koneturvallisuusominaisuudet yhdessä universaalin ohjelmiston kanssa olivat
merkittävimmät suuntaukset. Toisin kuin yleisesti teollisuudessa, pakkauskoneiden
energiansäästötavoitteet ovat ja tulevat olemaan matalalla tasolla seuraavina vuosina.
Page 3
ABSTRACT
Lappeenranta University Of Technology
Faculty of Technology
New Packaging Solutions
Tomi Juutilainen
Multi-axis solutions in packaging machines in Europe
Master’s thesis
2013
87 pages, 27 pictures, 8 tables and 10 attachments
Examiners: Ph.D, Professor Henry Lindell
Dr.Sc (Eng), Professor Juha Varis
Key words: Automation, motion control, multi-axis solution, packaging machine
The objective of this thesis was to examine the potential of multi-axis solutions in
packaging machines produced in Europe. The definition of a multi-axis solution in this
study is a construction that uses a common DC bus power supply for different
amplifiers running the axes and the intelligence is centralized into one unit. The cost
structure of a packaging machine was gained from an automation research, which
divided the machines according to automation categories. The automation categories
were then further divided into different sub-components by evaluating the ratio of
multi-axis solutions compared to other automation components in packaging machines.
A global motion control study was used for further information. With the help of the
ratio, an estimation of the potential of multi-axis solutions in each country and
packaging machine sector was completed. In addition to the research, a specific
questionnaire was sent to five companies to gain information about the present situation
and possible trends in packaging machinery.
The greatest potential markets are in Germany and Italy, which are also the largest
producers of packaging machinery in Europe. The greatest growth in the next few years
will be seen in Turkey where the annual growth rate equals the general machinery
production rate in Asia. The greatest market potential of the Nordic countries is found in
Sweden in 35th position on the list. According to the interviews, motion control
products in packaging machines will retain their current power levels, as well as the
number of axes in the future. Integrated machine safety features together with a
universal programming language are the desired attributes of the future. Unlike
generally in industry, the energy saving objectives are and will remain insignificant in
the packaging industry.
Page 4
PREFACE
The project has finally come to an end. First of all, I want to thank my supervisor Gert-
Jan Nijmolen, Professors Henry Lindell and Juha Varis who made the project run
smoothly. Secondly, I want to give thanks to my closest friends and to my employer
who supported me during the whole project. I have to say that the schedule was
extremely tight because of working parallel to this project but I’m satisfied with the
results. Now it is time to ease up for a while before the next project.
.
Page 5
CONTENTS
1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 10
1.1 Packages and packaging ............................................................................................... 12
1.1.1 General properties of a package ............................................................................................ 13
1.1.2 Package information and appearance ................................................................................... 13
1.2 Packaging lines and machines ......................................................................................... 15
1.2.1 Selection criteria ..................................................................................................................... 16
1.3 Grouping of packaging machines .................................................................................... 19
1.4 Machine safety and standards ......................................................................................... 21
1.4.1 Standards and Directives in machinery ................................................................................. 21
1.4.2.1 The Machinery Directive .................................................................................................. 22
1.4.2.2 Essential Health & Safety Requirements .......................................................................... 23
1.4.3 CEN ......................................................................................................................................... 24
1.4.4 EN standards .......................................................................................................................... 25
1.4.5 EN Harmonized European Standards ................................................................................... 26
1.4.6 Safety standards in packaging machinery ............................................................................. 26
1.5 Global markets for servo systems – Motion control ...................................................... 28
1.5.1 Global revenues for motion control products ........................................................................ 28
1.5.2 EMEA ..................................................................................................................................... 29
1.5.3 APAC ...................................................................................................................................... 30
1.5.4 America ................................................................................................................................... 30
1.5.4 Japan ....................................................................................................................................... 31
1.5.6 Fluctuations in motion control ............................................................................................... 32
1.5.7 Packaging machinery in motion control ................................................................................ 34
1.6 Packaging machinery in EMEA and Europe ................................................................. 35
1.6.1 Definitions for macroeconomic indicators ............................................................................. 36
1.6.2 Definitions for end-user indicators ........................................................................................ 36
1.6.3 Trends influencing the markets ............................................................................................. 37
Page 6
1.7 EMEA markets in packaging machinery ....................................................................... 39
1.7.1 Packaging machinery markets in EMEA by country ........................................................... 40
1.8 Automation in Packaging Machinery in Europe and EMEA ....................................... 41
1.8.1 Typical automation components ............................................................................................ 42
1.8.1.1 PLC – Programmable Logic Controller ............................................................................ 43
1.8.1.2 Motor drives..................................................................................................................... 43
1.8.1.3 Visualization components ................................................................................................ 44
1.8.1.4 Motion control ................................................................................................................. 45
1.8.1.5 Other automation products ............................................................................................... 47
1.9 Cost structure of a packaging machine produced in EMEA......................................... 48
1.9.1 Motion Control components in a packaging machine ........................................................... 51
1.9.2 Motor Drive components in a packaging machine ................................................................ 52
1.9.3 PLC components in a packaging machine ............................................................................. 53
1.9.4 Visualisation components in a packaging machine ............................................................... 54
2. Methodology............................................................................................................ 55
2.1 Research on the potential market share for multi-axis solutions in packaging
machinery in Europe ............................................................................................................. 55
2.2 The combination of the studies ........................................................................................ 60
2.2 Company Interviews ........................................................................................................ 68
2.2.1 The current situation .............................................................................................................. 69
2.2.1.1 Questions related to the current solution ........................................................................... 69
2.2.2 Future...................................................................................................................................... 70
2.2.2.1 Questions related to future solutions ................................................................................. 71
2.3 ABB Italy Interview ......................................................................................................... 72
2.3.1 Questions for ABB Italy ...................................................................................................... 72
3. Results...................................................................................................................... 73
3.1 Results of the market studies ........................................................................................... 73
3.2 Results of the interviews .................................................................................................. 77
3.2.1 Present concept ....................................................................................................................... 77
Page 7
3.2.2 Future concept ........................................................................................................................ 78
3.3 Results from ABB Italy .................................................................................................... 79
4. Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 81
5. Discussion and conclusions ....................................................................................... 83
REFERENCES .............................................................................................................. 86
ATTACHMENTS ......................................................................................................1-10
Page 8
Abbreviations
AC Alternating Current
APAC Asia Pacific
CAGR Compound Annual Growth Rate
CAM Rotating piece in a mechanical linkage
CEN European Committee for Standardization
CENELEC European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization
CNC Computerized Numerical Control
CPU Central Processing Unit
DC Direct Current
EEA European Economic Area
EHSR Essential Health and Safety Requirements
EMEA Europe, Midde East & Africa
EN European Standard
EU European Union
FFS Form-fill-seal
GMC General Motion Control
HMI Human Machine Interface
HVAC Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning
IMS Electronics Market Research & Consultancy
IP Ingress Protection Rating
ISO International Organization for Standardization
I/O Input/Output
MPYB The Machine Builders Year Book – Europe
PET Polyethylene Terephthalate
PLC Programmable Logic Controller
OACE Opportunities for Automation Companies in the EMEA Packaging
Machinery Industry
OEM Original Equipment Manufacturer
Page 9
ROI Return Of Investment
STO Safe Torque Off
V Volt
VFFS Vertical-form-fill-seal
W Watt
Page 10
10
1. Introduction
Our community is developing fast and the changing lifestyles of consumers are pushing
the machine manufacturers into a position where a wide and rapidly expanding range of
products need to be packed. The growth is fastest in regions where the standard of
living is at a lower level. Asia, Africa and Southern America are the greatest growth
areas in the industry, including packaging machinery. Nevertheless, this study only
focuses on Europe, as Europe is still the biggest region producing packaging machinery.
The Packaging industry is a very complicated field with multiple angles, which sets
challenges for all working in the area. The aim of this study was to find out the potential
market share of multi-axis solutions of the European packaging industry. The multi-axis
solution is not just a single component; it consists of various intricate parts. The most
challenging point of this study is that at the moment ABB is a not a major global player
in the packaging machinery automation and as a result lacks application specific
offering and solution knowledge. Multi-axis solutions are characterized by a common
DC bus for several drives which are fed from a single rectifier. A multi-axis solution is
a cost effective package for many reasons, for example it is very compact due to its
small size, energy saving due to the possibility of power sharing and cost effective due
to its modifiable structure. The ABB product range covers almost every industrial field
but the business in packaging automation is at a very low level. The result of the study
provides targets for ABB staff both in component designing and in business planning
for the sales organization.
In Europe, the markets and industries are growing steadily with annual rates of a few
percent while simultaneously the less developed countries are reaching massive, almost
triple growth rates. Despite this, the markets in Europe are very interesting; the average
unit price in motion control products is raising and packaging machinery is one of the
largest motion control product users. This study also gives an overview of the present
markets globally in the field of motion control products. After exemplifying how the
markets are spread globally and how they are developing in different regions, the focus
is moved to the packaging field in Europe. The general data of motion control markets
Page 11
11
is collected from the latest Motion Control IMS research, which examines the subject
from a global perspective. The data for packaging machinery markets is collected from
two surveys, which were the Opportunities for Automation Companies in the EMEA
Packaging Machinery Industry and The Machine Builders Year Book – Europe. The
survey focusing on automation was carried out in 2008 which was just before the global
recession started at the end of 2008. The other survey, The Machine Builder Year Book
was published at the beginning of 2011 and updated in November 2011. The Machine
Builder Year Book did not define the packaging machinery as precisely as the
Opportunities for Automation Companies in EMEA, and therefore these two surveys
were combined to gain a more in-depth understanding. The categorization for the
component definition was taken from the Opportunities for Automation Companies in
EMEA and the revenues from The Machine Builder Year Book. However, neither of
these studies evaluated the market share of multi-axis solutions. The combination of the
two aforementioned studies was not enough to determine the potential revenues for
multi-axis solutions, and therefore the motion control study was used to gain as precise
information as possible of the potential market share in packaging machinery. The
Motion Control World 2011, which examines machinery production on a larger scale,
reports that the packaging machinery sector is one of the greatest motion control
product users worldwide. As multi-axis solutions are listed under motion control, the
data could be applied from that study. After acquiring a large amount of information
from different sources, an estimation of the potential of multi-axis solutions in European
packaging machinery was attained. The results are depicted on rewritable Excel sheets
that can be modified by analyzing and modifying the possible shares for different
components listed under motion control.
The second part of the study was completed through interviewing companies working in
the packaging industry. Four of the interviewed companies’ core business is to build
packaging machines. Three of them were from Finland and one from Italy. Three of the
four Finnish companies export their machines worldwide and the remaining company
mainly focuses on automation design in their local market. The questionnaire was
divided into two sections, where the first part handled the present situation and the
second part included questions about the future. In total 30 questions were presented to
Page 12
12
the interviewees. The questions, composed in collaboration with ABB staff, were
designed to release as much useful data as possible.
1.1 Packages and packaging
Packages and packaging machinery cover a range of subjects including regulation,
directives, standards, automation and mechanics amongst other things. The primary
function of a package is to protect the packaged product from environmental harm.
However, today in addition to the primary function there are many other important
issues that a modern package has to provide for. With the requirement that a package
has to carry multiple integrated features, a packaging machine has to be able to form the
desired package in a very short time and to a high standard of quality. It is common that
a single packaging machine high in accuracy and speed needs to be integrated into the
whole packaging line. A packaging line can consist of multiple packaging machines.
Almost everything is packaged, which results in the range of packages and packaging
machinery being extensive.
The packaging industry is an interdisciplinary field of study combining art, science and
technology in the materials and machines that are used. The user group of packages is
wide, for almost every single person and company use specific packages. There are
packages for consumers and companies and both are divided into several sectors with a
very different nature in products as well as packages. Each type of package needs a
customized packaging line which sets challenges for both the companies whose core
business it is to sell products including the packaging transaction and for the companies
who are manufacturing packaging lines. [1]
Page 13
13
There are certain criteria that need to be met in order to produce a functional package.
To fulfill the criteria of a functional package it has to: [1]
Protect the product from the environment
Protect the environment from the packaged product
Maintain the given feature of a product
Enable highly efficient production and distribution
Improve the hygiene and security of the user and consumer
Report facts about the product, production, manufacturing company and recycling
Be as efficient as possible in saving energy and space in transportation
Be as efficient as possible in production costs
1.1.1 General properties of a package
The packaged product has to be protected against physical, chemical and biological
stresses. During the packaging process and transportation the package is under stress
which sets requirements for a package to handle vibrations, shocks, moisture, dust and
pressing. In foodstuff packaging the main threats to avoid are light and oxygen which
can be listed under chemical stresses. With the right packaging selection, biological
stresses such as pests, odors and flavors to the packaged product can be prevented.
Protection also acts as proof of the origin and quality of a packaged product because a
consumer can be mislead to buy a fake, broken or spoiled product. Many packages are
designed to be suitable, not just for the packaged product, but also with certain
dimensions and structures in mind, so that the package itself can be further packaged
into a transportation package with high efficiency in space. [1]
1.1.2 Package information and appearance
Different sectors have their own decrees in package labelling. For example, foodstuff
package labelling is different to the ones used in cosmetic packages. Usually the labels
Page 14
14
include information about product preservation, best before dates, usage and
maintenance instructions and other critical information. The information in package
labelling is useful not just for the end users but also for the packaging chain parties who
transport and sell the packages. Product usability information means multiple things,
two of which can be regarded as being high in value: the use of the packaged product
and the further recycling of the package. An environmentally friendly and safe package
guarantees that products or packages are disposed of correctly and ensures that there is
enough information for users not to harm themselves or the environment. [1]
The package has to be attractive enough, and give signals about the product to gain the
attention of consumers in order for them to buy it. A well-designed outward appearance
of a package is a great advertisement in image forming and promotes sales. The
possibilities in design are very broad nowadays because of the fast evolution in
techniques. Packaging companies spend vast amounts of money and time on designing a
package that is suitable, stylish and manufactured according to legislation. A consumer
easily recognizes a suitable product if the package provides a clear appearance with
certain symbols, branch marks or even slogans or any kind of signs with which the
product can be identified [1].
Page 15
15
1.2 Packaging lines and machines
A typical packaging line includes several sections that are synchronized with each other,
or work individually depending on the layout of the line and automation ratio. These
sections can be the material feeding unit, consumer packaging machine, transportation
packaging machine, single load unit and other devices related to lines which fulfill a
process. Other devices in the packaging line can be for example the closing device,
taping machine, sealing machine and labelling machine. Due to the complexity of the
packaging line, it is very common that a line has one or more intermediate storages to
maintain the production run with as low downtime as possible. A small storage before
the most critical part of the packaging line can be a huge improvement in production
volume. [1] Picture 1 shows the typical layout of a packaging line including several
different sections.
Picture 1. Packaging line. [2]
Page 16
16
1.2.1 Selection criteria
The package itself is a cost for the product manufacturer which drives them to make
decisions on packaging selection. The possible alternatives in product packaging are [2]:
Straight after the production line
Packaging near consumer markets
Using subcontracting in packaging
Externalize packing
Product without a package
The selection has to be made based on what is the most suitable location for packaging
machinery, which in turn depends on the possible production facilities and products that
need to be packed. If the packaging machinery is located directly after the production
line, it has to be fast enough not to slow down the whole process. But with some
products, such as in the food industry, it is necessary to pack the product immediately
after the production line has accomplished manufacturing the product.
High expectations of quality and quantities set demands for the packaging line
manufactures to meet the requirements of packaging companies, as well as of end users.
The greater the demands, the faster the machines are expected to create packages.
Therefore, mechanical durability plays a great role already during the packaging process
and not only after the product has been packed. [5] Mechanical durability is necessary
in order to maintain the desired production speed with as low downtime as possible.
Automation in packaging machines together with complex mechanics is also an
essential part of the whole system.
The product itself is one of the main criteria in packaging line and machinery selection,
in addition to the rate of production, logistics, market location, customer demands and
the expertise of the packaging company [1]. In machinery selection, it is highly
recommended to gain as much information as possible about the product itself. The
importance of product specification is on as high a level as selecting the packaging
materials [4]. Before starting packaging, a company has to form a deep calculation of
the needed capital, operating expenses and possible waste expenses, not forgetting the
Page 17
17
risk analysis for the machinery. Over time, operating costs in packaging transactions
rise compared to what they are when the initial investment is made. The required
amount of operators to run the machine is an essential part of the operating expenses,
and it is fairly common that small companies use very simple machines that require
more manpower. Fully automated packaging lines are dependent on the production
volume, for the reason that a single investment is substantially higher than it is in less
automated machines. A fully automated packaging line can be an enormous investment
in the beginning but offers many benefits, such as better package uniformity and
quality, improved hygiene and fewer downtime periods. [1]
Picture 2 represents the main criteria for packaging line selection in addition to the
product features. As stated before, the package itself is one of the directive variables in
the packaging line selection.
Picture 2. Selection criteria of a packaging line. [1]
Many packaging machine manufactures are rather small and specialized in a certain
sector. Another common feature for packaging machinery is that packaging machines,
products and packages are tailor-made according to the customer’s needs and required
product features almost every time. Tailor made machines mean that there is no serial
Selection criterias of a
packaging line
Present machinery
Market demand
Schedule
Production number
Quality demand
Machinery technology
Production mode
Effects to the other
production
Page 18
18
production and the supplied machines are delivered in small batches, with a few
exceptions in the industry.
A packaging machine covers multiple phases and separate axes for different tasks.
Frequently, the axes need to be synchronized with each other and in the past these were
usually driven by one single mechanical power shaft wherefrom the ratios for different
parts of the machine were implemented with levers. This means that when the power
shaft is on the move the other phases are also moving with the defined ratio. It provides
very accurate synchronization where the axes are always in the desired position. In
modern packaging machines the control of different axes is done by using motion
control products for controlling several induction or servo motors.
It is very common that a packaging machine is controlled from one computed system.
One common feature of modern packaging machine control is that all the axes are
working in a closed loop. The definition of a closed loop is that a motor is equipped
with a device that provides motor shaft position feedback to the system, which makes
the process more accurate and faster. The controlling signals from the main system to
the motor controllers are usually sent in digital, analog or fieldbus forms. [1]
Packaging speeds in modern packaging machines are respectably fast. For example, a
wrapping machine wrapping sweets is able to wrap more than 1000 sweets per minute;
this cannot be detected with the human eye due to the high speed. The starting point in
packaging machine design is to give a target speed defining how many packages or how
many kilograms have to be packed during a given time frame. The target can be defined
in pieces, weight or units requiring packaging in a given varying time period between a
minute and one year. Despite the demanding targets on machinery speed, the designed
maximum capacity is not always the setting that is used in production. A line is made up
of several different parts which need to run together smoothly. [1] There might be
sections or single tasks that are not as fast as the single packaging machine, so the
production speed is limited to the lowest part of the line. If a single machine is working
alone it can be ran at full speed, but seldom are machines running at the designed
maximum speed. There are other important points to consider regarding production
speed, such as a decrease in quality, and the number of incorrect packages; both of
which are more likely to occur as the machine speed grows. [5]
Page 19
19
1.3 Grouping of packaging machines
The range of different kinds of packaging machines is wide and the given names for
certain machines come from the operating method or the product brand name. For
example, the name of the filling machine comes from the operation it performs. The
same can be said of many others, such as the names of the sacking machine and
pouching machine. The prevailing language in the packaging branch is English and
many machinery names derive from the English initials. The FFS machine is a very
common packaging machine type and the initials stand for form-fill-seal, which also
describes the operating function of the machine. Different machines are divided into
vertical and horizontal machines according to the direction of the material flow in the
machine. One example of vertical machines is VFFS, vertical-form-fill-seal machine,
also known as Transwrap, which is a brand of a certain manufacturer. [1]
Packaging machines can be grouped and classified according to the operating method
and product that is being packed. Standard EN 415-1 stands for the security of
packaging machines: Part 1. Vocabulary and classifying of packaging machinery and
devices related to packaging machines. In the following list the most common types of
packaging machines according to the EN 415.-1 standard are presented. The standard is
in use in many countries and it simplifies the selection criteria of a packaging line
dividing machines into their own compartments, which makes the search for a suitable
supplier easier for packaging companies. The most relevant standards are introduced in
more detail later. [3]
Grouping of packaging machinery according to German machine manufacturers. [3]
Filling Machines
o piece products
o grains
o powders
o liquids
Sealing machines (Filling and sealing machines)
o flexible packages
o carton packages
o ampoules, capsules
o tubes
o bottles, cans, goblet, bowls, plates….
o barrels, buckets
Page 20
20
Form-fill-seal machines
o track materials
o seamed small pouches
o other flexible packages
o bubble packages
o other heat formable packages
Machinery for products that need to be protected
o vacuum packaging
o shielding gas packaging
o aseptic packaging
o medicine packaging (GMP)
Wrapping machines
o partly or full wrapping machines
o spiral wrapping machines
o shrink or surface film machines
Group packaging machines
o Housing, base, erection, filling and sealing machines
o wrapping machines
o film wrapping machines
o palletizing and unloading machines
o single unit load verifying machines
o single unit load dressing machines
Other packaging machines
o sack opening and emptying machines
o metal can, tube and cover machines
o testing and controlling machines
o cleaning and drying machines
o labelling, finishing and gluing machines
Page 21
21
1.4 Machine safety and standards
Every machine has to be safe enough not to cause any harm to the environment and
humans. The policy on safety has been tightened lately and it is not rare that a company
appoints a specific person whose primary job description is exclusively to take care of
machine safety. The safety level of old-fashioned machines is considerably low
compared to the current level. Modern devices are designed so that they should not be
able to harm humans or cause injuries while the machine is running or stopped. There
are many directives, some of which are common to all machinery sectors, and some
which are valid only within a specific region and sector. For packaging machinery there
are also a lot of standards and directives but the most relevant EN 415 – X standards
related to machine safety are only briefly introduced. Standards are not usually available
free of charge and none were purchased for the use of this research. The world of
standards and directives is very complex and would require dedication on the subject;
therefore the subject is dealt with only superficially here.
1.4.1 Standards and Directives in machinery
Inside the world of European directives for machinery in the industry, two can be
highlighted as the most relevant. [4]
The Machinery Directive
The Use of Work Equipment by Workers at Work Directive
Both directives are directly related to Essential Health and Safety Requirements (EHSR)
and can be utilized to confirm equipment safety in The Use of Work Equipment by
Workers at Work Directive.
Page 22
22
1.4.2.1 The Machinery Directive
The machinery directive covers the supply of new machinery, safety components and
other products. It is against the law to supply machinery to the EU area without
fulfilling the directive. The definition for machinery within the directive is that the
machine is a combination of a fitted drive system including at least one section, which
is capable of performing a task without the help of a human. [4]
The present valid directive (2006/42/EY) was implemented on 29th
of December 2009
and obligates the machinery manufacturer or authorized representative to assure that the
supplied equipment is in conformity with the directive. [4]
Ensuring that the applicable EHSRs contained in Annex I of the Directive are
fulfilled
A technical file is prepared
Appropriate conformity assessment is carried out
An “EC Declaration of Conformity” is given
CE Marking is affixed where applicable
Instructions for safe use are provided
Picture 3 represents the guidance of procedures for fulfilling the machinery directive.
Page 23
23
Picture 3. Overview procedure for the machinery directive. [4]
1.4.2.2 Essential Health & Safety Requirements
EHSR is a list that contains requirements for machinery that have to be complied with.
The main purpose of the list is to guarantee that the machinery is safe to use and
maintained throughout its lifetime. Here are some of the typical requirements for
review, however, it is important to take into account all requirements listed in the EHSR
annex. The annex is available in the 4th
version of Safebook. [4]
Inherently Safe Design. When possible the machinery design can prevent
dangerous situations.
Page 24
24
Additional Protection Devices. When it is not possible to design the machinery to
be safe enough, certain safety equipment can be used to prevent any hazards. These
safety products can be for example safety locks, light-curtains or safety (sensing)
mats.
Personal Protective Equipment and/or Training must be used if the methods
above are not adequate in guaranteeing the safety of the machinery.
Machinery controls and control systems must be safe and must not be capable of
starting unexpectedly. Machines must be equipped with at least one or more emergency
stop device, and the surrounding environment has to be appropriate, including adequate
lighting and handling of the machine. The machinery structure has to be stable where
the used materials are appropriate and do not include sharp edges or surfaces that could
cause damage. The machine designer or liable authorized person has to be able to prove
that the machinery is in conformity with EHRS. A statement should include relevant
information about the machinery, such as specifications, results from the tests and
drawings. [4]
1.4.3 CEN
CEN (The European Committee for Standardization) is the leading and only recognized
organization in Europe according to directive 98/34/EC for the planning, drafting and
adoption of European Standards in all places where an economic activity occurs.
CENELEC and ETSI are the only exceptions where the CENELEC is related to
electrotechnology and ETSI is related to telecommunication. [7]
Page 25
25
CEN Vision:
”to make a contribution to Europe's innovative capacity, global competitiveness,
sustainable growth, and to welfare of its citizens, by being the organisation of choice
for raising standards”[6]
CEN being a non-profit organization, founded in Belgium in 1975, is working to
remove trade barriers and improve and support the European economy, the welfare of
citizens and the environment. CEN offers a base for the development of EU standards
and technical instructions. A total of 33 national members across Europe are working
together with CEN to develop European Standards, EN’s. EN standards decrease
development and testing costs with very wide market reach in European internal
markets. These EN standards are also national standards in every member country,
which means that 1 European standard equals 33 National standards. CEN signed the
Vienna Agreement with the ISO (International Organization for Standardization) in
1991. ISO is CEN’s counterpart on a global scale and the agreement verifies
cooperation between these two participants in improving the technical compatibility and
adoption of the same text for both ISO and EN. [7]
1.4.4 EN standards
A European Standard, EN, is known as a very complicated process that causes further
costs for manufacturers. Regardless of this, it is one of the most important standards in
the whole business. EN standards are not known among all organizations, and maybe
the information is not relevant for all working in the industry. As a phrase or word,
“standards” is often interpreted as being boring or even considered inconsequential,
even though organizations have to take them into consideration while designing or
manufacturing technological products. In actual fact, standards push the manufactures
into a better market position and are crucial factors in gaining visibility for the company
inside, and even outside Europe. Standardization provides benefits for all parties related
to the manufacturing of technological products. Increased product safety, high quality
Page 26
26
products, lower costs in testing and transactions can be mentioned as the best benefits
enabled by standardization. [8]
1.4.5 EN Harmonized European Standards
The following standards are common to all countries in EEA, produced by CEN and
CENELEC. The use of standards is voluntary but designing and manufacturing a
machine according to these standards is the most direct way of ensuring compliance
with EHSR of the Machinery Directive. [4]
Type A. Standards: Cover aspects applicable to all types of machines.
Type B. Standards: Subdivided into 2 groups.
Type B1 Standards: Cover particular safety and ergonomic aspects of machinery.
Type B2 Standards: Cover safety components and protective devices.
Type C. Standards: Cover specific types or groups of machines.
It is noteworthy that complying with a C standard automatically presumes conformity
with the EHSR. If it is not possible to find a suitable C standard for use, A and B
standards can be used as part or full proof of the EHSR conformity.
1.4.6 Safety standards in packaging machinery
For packaging machinery safety standardization, CEN has published nine different EN
standards which are shown below. Three standards are under development, two of
which are updates of the existing EN415-1 and EN415-6, but EN 415-10 is completely
new and stands for general requirements of packaging machine safety. EN 415-10 will
be implemented in November 2013, while the current status is still under approval. [9]
Page 27
27
CEN/TC 146 standards under development for packaging machines [9]:
FprEN 415-10 General Requirements
prEN 415-1 rev Terminology and classification of packaging machines and
associated equipment
EN 415-6:2013 Pallet wrapping machines
CEN/TC 146 published standards for packaging machines [9]:
EN 415-1:2000+A1:2009 Terminology and classification of packaging machines
and associated equipment
EN 415-2:1999 Pre-formed rigid container packaging machines
EN 415-3:1999+A1:2009 Form, fill and seal machines
EN 415-4:1997 and AC:2002 Palletisers and depalletisers
EN 415-5:2006+A1:2009 Wrapping machines
EN 415-6:2006+A1:2009 Pallet wrapping machines
EN 415-7:2006+A1:2008 Group and secondary packaging machines
EN 415-8:2008 Strapping machines
EN 415-9:2009 Noise measurement methods for packaging machines, packaging
lines and associated equipment, grade of accuracy 2 and 3
Page 28
28
1.5 Global markets for servo systems – Motion control
The investigation of the motion control markets is based on the IMS Motion Control
World 2011. The same organization has also carried out the research where the
packaging machinery production in EMEA is investigated. The scope of the industries
and markets is limited to GMC and CNC, General motion control products and
Computerized Numerical Control. GMC is more relevant to packaging machinery
because the global revenues in GMC for packaging machinery are approximately six to
seven hundred times bigger than CNC on a global scale.
1.5.1 Global revenues for motion control products
Estimated world revenues for motion control products for the year 2011 were predicted
to be just short of 13 Billion U.S dollars with a very high growth rate because of strong
recovery from the recession that occurred during 2008 and 2009. The growth rate
stabilized back to its normal growth level in 2012. An average annual growth rate for
motion control products is forecasted to be 6.2 % from 2008 to 2015 which drives the
total motion control revenues up to nearly 18 Billion U.S dollars with more than 22.000
thousand units shipped. The growth rate for motion control products is dependent on
machinery production recovery in each sector. The Machine tool sector has been the
market booster after economic depression and the sector has a high share in motion
control markets representing over 45 % of the total market. [11]
Page 29
29
Picture 4. The share of motion control revenues by region. [11]
1.5.2 EMEA
Because of the high number of machine builders, the most substantial area for motion
controls has long been EMEA. Despite the depressive years of 2008 and 2009, EMEA
still holds the leading position in the motion control market with annual revenues of 3.4
Billion U.S dollars in 2010. Total sales of the motion control products in EMEA for
2011 were predicted to be nearly 4 Billion U.S dollars. However, forecasts for longer
periods show that the Asia Pacific area is about to take EMEA’s place as the leading
motion control user region. If the forecast holds true, the Asia Pacific region will
overtake EMEA in 2014. The recovery from the recession has been difficult due to
economic problems in the area. Growth rates are also forecasted to be lower than for
other regions with 0,3 % in unit supply and 2.4 % in CAGR revenues up to 2015. [11]
EMEA motion control markets;
33,50%
American motion control
markets; 13,90%
Asia Pacific motion control
markets; 30,10%
Japanese motion control markets;
22,50%
Page 30
30
1.5.3 APAC
The second largest motion control product market area is Asia Pacific with 30.1 % of
the market share in 2010. During the recession, China’s economy was able to make
positive growth while other countries and continents suffered with negative numbers.
China’s motion control markets grew almost 6.0 % during 2009 and the estimated
growth for 2010 was 36.2 %. This means that Asia Pacific has been able to gain over 10
percent of the total motion control markets since 2008 with the help of strong
machinery production. This area differs from the others because the demand in
equipment technology is lower than it is in the other areas. The equipment does not
have to be as flexible and high in performance as in EMEA; but the quality and life
cycle are not the qualities to bargain with. Even if requirements on flexibility and
performance levels are not high, the quality and expected life span for motion control
products, as well as for servo drives and motors should be at the same level as
elsewhere. This phenomenon has an effect on both local and international machine
builders who are supplying, or just about to enter the area markets. Another important
factor in Asia Pacific markets is that China, which is holding the markets for magnets, is
one of the growing countries in machine building and is able to control the supply of
magnets for the benefit of domestic use. In fact, controlling the supply may increase
prices in other areas but in Asia Pacific, prices are more likely to remain at the same
level, which sets challenges to international machine builders. The Asia Pacific markets
are predicted to rise 15.1 % in revenues and 17.1 % in unit supply from 2008 to 2015.
[11]
1.5.4 America
The American motion control market share was about 13.9 % in 2010 with 1.4 Million
U.S dollars. American markets started to recover earlier than the EMEA area with very
strong performance in sectors such as packaging and semiconductor equipment. The
first nine months of 2011 in machine tool sales showed that the sales increased an
Page 31
31
incredible 80 % compared to levels in 2010. But in general the motion control markets
are predicted to rise 5.7 % in sales and 2.0 % in units during the period from 2008 to
2015. [11]
1.5.4 Japan
In 2010, Japanese motion control markets took 22.5 % of the total global markets and
gained some share back that was lost in 2008 and 2009. If the Asia Pacific markets have
their own nature, so has the Japanese market; the markets are totally dominated by local
suppliers such as Yaskawa Electric, Mitsubishi Electric, Fanuc, Panasonic and Sanyo
Denki. Japanese markets made a strong recovery from the recession and it was reported
that the first half of 2011 saw 40 % growth in machine tool orders. The Japanese motion
control market predictions show an increase of 3.2 % in revenues and a decrease of 3.0
% in terms of units from 2008 to 2015. [11]
Picture 5. Predicted revenue growths in different regions. [11]
3,20%
15,10%
2,40%
5,70%
0,00%
2,00%
4,00%
6,00%
8,00%
10,00%
12,00%
14,00%
16,00%
Revenues growth 2008 - 2015
Japanese motion control markets Asia Pacific motion control markets
EMEA motion control markets American motion control markets
Page 32
32
If the growth in the Asia Pacific region was on a level of its own, the same presence can
be seen if the variable is changed into supplied units instead of revenues. The negative
growth of the Japanese markets suggest that the unit prices are going to rise per piece
because if the revenue growth is positive and unit growth negative the result is a higher
price per unit. In fact, even if the EMEA and American regions supply growth is
positive, the growth is so small that it means that unit prices are going to rise in those
regions as well. Asia Pacific unit supply growth is more than 17 % and almost at the
same level with the annual revenue growth. [11]
Picture 6. Predicted unit supply growth in different regions. [11]
1.5.6 Fluctuations in motion control
If economic growth was down during the recession in 2008 and 2009, so too was
machinery production. The machinery production rate varies enormously depending on
the global economic condition, and if we examine the years 2006 and 2007, growth was
extremely high. Recovery after the difficult years started in 2010, when the total world
output started to grow with 5.1 % average growth and machinery production growth
was 17.0 % simultaneously. In the previous year, 2009, machinery production
contracted by 18.9 %. The direction of the growth rate of motion control products has
-3,00%
17,10%
0,30% 2,00%
-5,00%
0,00%
5,00%
10,00%
15,00%
20,00%
unit supply growth 2008 - 2015
Japanese motion control markets Asia Pacific motion control markets
EMEA motion control markets American motion control markets
Page 33
33
been similar to the machinery production rate but it oscillates a lot more, making it
seem more vulnerable against economic conditions. In picture 7, a short period growth
rate comparison between motion control and machinery production is shown. [11]
Picture 7. Growth rate comparison for motion control and machinery production. [11]
One of the main, or even the best feature of the servo motor is that there is no need to
execute a magnetic field to start up the motor. It is started with concrete magnets which
are mounted inside the motor. If that is a benefit in fast movement and low reaction
times in the process, it can be an issue in component purchasing. The magnets which are
used in servo motors are manufactured from rare earth minerals, neodymium and
dysprosium and the markets are lead by China. The same materials can also be found on
other continents but the final price is higher due to legislation which makes the mining
of these minerals unprofitable. In fact, China has controlling position in producing this
rare material which in turn, has seen an increase in prices but has also prompted other
countries to find alternative ways of extracting neodymium. [11]
-30,00%
-20,00%
-10,00%
0,00%
10,00%
20,00%
30,00%
2009 2010 2011
motion control market
machinery production
Page 34
34
1.5.7 Packaging machinery in motion control
In 2010 the total GMC market was approximately 6.1 Billion U.S dollars together with
over 11 Million units and took a market share of almost 56 % of the total motion control
market. At the same time CNC motion control markets were smaller in revenues 4.8
Billion U.S dollars and in supplied units 3.8 Million. The much smaller unit supply in
CNC is due to higher average unit price. The higher unit price in CNC motion control
products is explained by the units used in the machine tool sector, which are very high
in the degree of technology. Both GMC and CNC motion control areas are predicted to
increase just over 6% yearly from 2008 to 2015. Packaging machinery requires more
motion control products than other machinery due to the large number of motion axes in
the average packaging machine. Sales of motion control products in packaging
machinery were 637,7 Million U.S dollars in 2010, where as the share for GMC was
636,7 and for CNC 1,0 Million U.S dollars. It is remarkable that in total scale the
packaging industry represents 6,3 % of the total revenues but under GMC products the
share is an impressive 11,0 %. The growth of motion control products in packaging
machinery is predicted as 10,7 % CAGR up to 2015. [10] The research shows that the
ratio in revenues between the stand-alone and multi-axis solution is approximately 55 %
versus 45 % on a global scale in all machinery. The ratio is leaning towards multi-axis
solutions according to the predictions, and after a couple of years, the ratio will be 50 %
for both solutions. The method of calculation for the single- or multi-axis solution is
that a drive is a single axis solution if each encased drive has its own electrical supply.
The definition of a multi-axis solution is that a drive DC bus has to be connected but the
power supply can be centralized or decentralized. [12]
Page 35
35
1.6 Packaging machinery in EMEA and Europe
The market data, categorization and machinery cost structure are collected from the year
2007 and the values starting from 2008 up to 2015 are based on estimations. That is
why the numbers given in currency may not be applicable due to the recession which
started at the end of 2008. There are still available data with which to count the ratios
between different machinery types, the grade of automation, and relation between
different countries and sectors. In this chapter the main idea is to show the cost structure
in a packaging machine between different packaging sectors.
The packaging machinery market has been divided into nine market areas [13]:
Bottling line machinery
Cartoning machinery
Closing machinery
Filling & dosing machinery
Form, fill & seal machinery
Labelling, decorating & coding machinery
Palletising machinery
Wrapping & bundling machinery
Other packaging machinery
IMS research has selected five different indicators with which to predict market growth
because packaging machinery is spread over such a wide area, and therefore cannot be
predicted by using a single indicator. Two of the selected indicators were
macroeconomic and the other three were industry-specific projections. Macroeconomic
indicators were industrial and manufacturing output, and the other three indicators used
were growth profiles for the sectors: Food, Beverages and Personal care (toiletries and
cosmetics). [13]
Page 36
36
1.6.1 Definitions for macroeconomic indicators
The industrial production indicator is the output of industrial establishments handling
mining and quarrying, manufacturing and electricity, gas and water supply. Industrial
production is an outstanding indicator because of its latitude as a yardstick of a nation’s
productivity and manufacturing output, together with the services surrounding total
manufacturing output. But the service part of industrial production is not related to
packaging machinery growth and has been taken into account. [13]
Manufacturing output is defined as a sum of intermediate, investment and consumer
goods, being a subset of overall industrial production. It only measures the physical
output of goods used in the production of other goods or those which are sent directly to
the end market. There is a direct correlation between the trends in the physical output of
goods and trends within packaging machinery production to manufacture these goods.
[13]
1.6.2 Definitions for end-user indicators
The food sector was the most extensive market area for packaging machinery in EMEA
in 2007. Food processing is closely tied to packaging machinery as when food
processing lines are updated, it is a common phenomenon that packaging lines are
simultaneously modernized. [13]
The beverage sector is close behind the food sector and is also tightly linked with
packaging machinery. In Western Europe, bottled water in plastic bottles is a trend that
drives growth in the beverage business and covers over 30 % of all beverages. Milk is
the second most packed liquid after water and has a share of over 20 % of all beverages
as well as very high predicted growth. The other two major beverage products are soft
drinks and beer, with a combined share of over 30 %. [13]
Personal care, toiletries and cosmetics is in very high growth speed according to the
predictions that assume that growth per year could be from 6 % up to 10 %. The
Page 37
37
cosmetics sector is expected to be the broadest as a result of better life quality in today’s
world, which shows in usage of cosmetic products. [13]
1.6.3 Trends influencing the markets
There are many facts that drive growth either in a positive or negative direction in the
packaging machinery field. While focusing on the EMEA area, it is good to know that
Asia together with Eastern Europe are big players in packaging machinery due to the
rising standards of living as well as their increasing populations. Yet even today, the
market area of Asia and Eastern Europe is more focused on packaging machinery with
lower demands and lower prices. Low-cost manufacturing creates competition, and the
predicted revenues regarding units and volume are high even with a low margin
machine.
If a low-cost type packaging machine is preferred elsewhere, in EMEA flexibility,
reliability and speed are the key words describing the demands of a packaging machine.
The flexibility and fast changeovers of packaging machines have had a positive effect
on EMEA packaging machinery. The simplest configuration enables a company to pack
different kinds of packages with different dimensions with just one packaging machine.
[13] It is possible because a packaging machine can be supplied with very flexible,
increased levels of automation and the changeovers can be fast with minimum down
time [5]. This is becoming more and more important as packages vary but companies
are not willing to tie their capital to a wide range of machines.
Technological innovations are much appreciated in the packaging machinery business
and the trend is that the more a packaging machine is able to work alone without
external human work, the better it is for total productivity. A good example is of a robot
able to work without humane pauses with a very high work trace. Highly automated
packaging machines have numerically grown a great deal lately and that is why motion
control products, such as servo motors and drives, have become common in the
machinery. The mechanical part of a packaging machine has experienced an update as
well, and therefore many machines have been equipped with linear guides instead of
Page 38
38
mechanical cam, lever and bearing assemblies. The reason for the changeover to linear
guide technology is simply that the machines need less maintenance without
compromising the quality of production or product being packed. [13]
Flexibility is in high valuation in packaging machines but so is functionality. It is not
unusual to find packaging machines that can form or fill different kinds of packages. In
the packaging machinery business, returns on investment enable the users to select the
best choice in regaining the invested money as soon as possible; so accordingly the
fastest machine is not always selected. Obviously, the speed of the machine is relevant
but when various product types need to be packed the total sum of different variables
are combined. These variables can be for example machine productivity, flexibility,
time to train users and maintenance time between production runs. Each of these
variables rates differently depending on the user but a general target is the minimization
of the ROI (Return Of Investment). [13]
Green values in packaging have increased the demands for the ability to recycle and
avoid extra waste. For example, in the dairy industry milk products using cartons as
their material have seen a shift towards PET packages due to the ease of recycling these
products. The package alone is not the only issue in green values, and the future will see
an increased concentration on the energy efficiency of packaging machinery. But even
if these green values are forcing packages to become as environmentally friendly as
possible, single portion packages are also demanding high interest. The reason is
different; a single-person type household has multiplied significantly in recent years and
such a household is a common user of single portion packages. [13]
Page 39
39
1.7 EMEA markets in packaging machinery
OACE (Opportunities for Automation Companies in the EMEA Packaging Machinery
Industry) divides the packaging machinery business into two different areas which are
the machines sold in EMEA and the machines produced in EMEA. The bill of
automation of the machines sold to EMEA was not available. The data for the
automation share of the total cost was available only for machines which were produced
in EMEA. The total packaging sales revenues in EMEA are relatively smaller than the
total production revenues because only a small amount of packaging machines are
imported, except at the low end of the market where service is a less important factor to
machine builders. [13]
The total market for packaging machines sold in EMEA was estimated to be worth 10,3
Billion Euros in 2007 with a forecast of total sales being near 13 Billion Euros in 2012,
with 4,5 % CAGR. Total production of packaging machinery was 13,8 Billion Euros in
EMEA in 2007 with almost 200.000 pieces manufactured. Filling & Dosing machinery
was the product type with the highest revenue, the second highest was Closing
machinery and the third was Cartoning Machinery in both areas, sold and produced, in
EMEA. [13]
The latest study represents the total packaging machinery production in Europe & CIS
countries (not in EMEA) and comes to approximately 14,4 Billion Euros in 2008 and
13,2 Billion Euros in 2009. The total fall in machinery production from 2008 to 2009
was 25,6 % on average where the packaging machinery area suffered with less than 9 %
average drop in revenues in production. [14]
Packaging machinery is the fifth largest market sector in the machinery business in
Europe after material handling, agricultural machinery, machine tool and food &
beverage and tobacco machinery. European machinery in production revenues was
372,5 Billion Euros in 2008, 289,3 Billion Euros in 2009 and estimated to be 339
Billion Euros in 2010 and growing with 5 % CAGR up to 2015. If these sectors are
explored more closely, they expose that from the automation point of view, the
packaging sector is the fourth highest area in revenues. The total usage of automation
components in packaging machines was 2,6 Billion Euros in revenues in 2010 adopting
Page 40
40
an 11 % share of the total revenues in automation components used in machinery
production in Europe. [14]
1.7.1 Packaging machinery markets in EMEA by country
The central and western European countries have a huge appetite for consuming
processed foods and beverages. In 2007, Germany was the most extensive market
region in EMEA with 2,8 Billion Euros in revenues which was followed by Italy with
1,8 Billion Euros revenue. The third greatest region in EMEA was the UK & Ireland
with total revenues of 0,926 Billion Euros. The largest packaging machinery production
country in 2007 was Germany with 4,6 Billion Euros, in addition it was the biggest
consumer, followed by the second largest producer Italy with 3,2 Billion Euros [13]
After the correction to the European Machinery production yearbook – 2011 Edition,
Italy was placed as the biggest European country in revenues in packaging machinery
manufacturing. But after revenue values were corrected, Germany still held the position
of being the biggest packaging machinery country in Europe.
Page 41
41
1.8 Automation in Packaging Machinery in Europe and EMEA
The ratio of automation in packaging machinery has been in high growth, since
prices of automation products have fallen to a reasonable level and there has been
tremendous evolution in technology. It is very common that functions that were only
possible with mechanical solutions can be executed using electrical axes. A typical
example of a mechanical solution is the power-shaft function where several
components are connected to each other and the motion is synchronized. The same
idea can be implemented with modern automation components with the desired
accuracy, speed and flexibility. Actually, flexibility is better in solutions where
automation components are used because if the components are not mechanically
connected, a single component can be modified to make the desired motion without
influencing the other components and the motion is adjustable when the device is
running or stopped, depending on the type of automation used. Automation
components need fewer maintenance procedures but on the other hand, they require a
qualified employee for designing and commissioning.
A multi-axis solution is not just a single unit that can be placed into the machinery
and the button pressed for starting up the whole device. There are a lot of other
components related to the system, and for the reader, it is essential information to
know what the whole system might include, in addition to the multi-axis controller.
In picture 4 the typical multi-axis solution system is represented. Antti Kuusela’s
Master Thesis Determination of multi-axis servo drives system topologies 2011
presents a general overview of the system architectures focusing mainly on multi-
axis servo systems. [12] All the other essential components, except stepper motors
and stepper drives, are shown in picture 8. The typical architecture in picture 8 is
suitable not only for packaging machinery but can also be used in other machinery.
The multi-axis motion controller component is portrayed in red in picture 8 and as
can be seen, all the information inside the architecture is going through it.
Page 42
42
Picture 8. Typical automation architecture in multi-axis solution. [12]
1.8.1 Typical automation components
A modern packaging machine includes many automated tasks where a user does not
have to do any physical work. Therefore, a lot of automation components are required to
create the motion for the designed mechanics. Packaging machines are able to receive
the packaged piece, form a suitable package and convey it forward to the next station or
to the next packaging phase.
According to Opportunities for Automation Companies in the EMEA Packaging
Machinery Industry – IMS, the description for automation components is divided
into the following components which are introduced briefly with a picture after the
description. [13]
Page 43
43
1.8.1.1 PLC – Programmable Logic Controller
PLC is a microprocessor-based device used in discrete manufacturing for line and
machinery controlling. The common programming language used is IEC 61131
based and the devices are RISC-based. [13] A normal system includes a CPU
(Central Processing Unit), I/O’s (digital or analog input/output module) and a
fieldbus card. The main component is the CPU and all the other components are
options which can be added to expand the system. One CPU can handle 320 digital
I/O points which after the needed I/O’s has to be decentralized and at the same time
the same CPU supports up to four different types of fieldbuses [23].
Picture 9. ABB AC500 PLC with I/O and fieldbus options. [15]
1.8.1.2 Motor drives
A motor drive is a piece of equipment that can adjust the speed of a motor by
controlling the frequency [13]. Motor drives are used more frequently after the
development in techniques. The invention was released at the end of the 1970s when
a 5,5 kW drive was the width of a normal human being and nearly two meters high.
Today, a modern drive (or frequency converter) has significantly decreased in size,
now being a very small piece of equipment. A modern 5,5 kW drive is approximately
150 mm in height, 100 mm in width and 100 mm in depth. While the physical size of
a drive has decreased a great deal, the technical features have increased in many
ways. The most recent technical features in a drive are that they support many kinds
Page 44
44
of fieldbuses, have some kind of integrated safety feature and the software can be
modified by the user. [24]
Picture 10. ABB ACS355 frequency converter for motor speed controlling. [16]
1.8.1.3 Visualization components
Visualization components are for example operator terminals such as HMI (Human
Machine Interfaces), displays that can show text and graphics and Industrial PC’s.
[13] HMI provides a practical user interface for machinery controlling. Usually a
HMI includes a touch screen or push buttons where a user can follow desired
variables and make changes to the configuration. Industrial PC’s are more
complicated equipment because they are able to control a full machine, including
several available options such as fieldbuses and I/O’s and in some cases IPC can be
used to replace PLC [12].
Picture 11. ABB CP650 control panel. [16]
Page 45
45
1.8.1.4 Motion control
Motion control includes servo motors containing an integrated feedback device,
including brushed DC servo motors [13]. The range of servo motors is broad
including many options for feedback. The feedback is usually selected depending on
the need for accuracy, environment or price. The most versatile encoder type for
feedback is the multi-turn absolute encoder because it is extremely precise and the
shaft position information is genuine, even if the main supply is lost during the run.
Thus, it can be noted that the absolute encoder remembers its position permanently.
There are some weaknesses in absolute encoders because the principle is based on
optical activity, which is not as robust as the principle in resolver feedback. A servo
motor including resolver feedback can be mounted in harsh environments due to the
better duration in the resolver. The principle in the resolver is based on an
electromagnetic field surrounding the magnetic poles, and is therefore less vulnerable
to external threats [12].
Picture 12. ABB MS-servo motor series with resolver feedback. [18]
Fully enclosed servo drives with a single power output that can control the current,
speed or position of any servo motor are listed as motion control products. In multi-
axis systems each drive is counted individually. [13] A modern servo drive has to
have a position feedback because the repository is usually an application that needs
to be very dynamic and accurate. A servo drive can be controlled via fieldbus, pulse
train or digital or analog signals. [25]
Page 46
46
Picture 13. ABB Microflex e150 servo drive with integrated EtherCat fieldbus. [19]
The remaining products under motion control are the stepper motors with or without
feedback, 2-, 3- or 5-phase, hybrid and stepper motors with an integrated drive. If the
drive is supplied separately it is considered a fully enclosed stepper drive or amplifier
for the controlling of speed and position in stepper motors. [13]
Picture 14. ABB DSMS-series stepper motors with integrated drive. [20]
The fifth main component under motion control is the position controller. The
definition of a position controller is that the structure is PLC-based, PC-based or a
stand-alone type. In picture 15, a typical position controller provided by ABB is
shown. Usually a position controller is able to run several axes at the same time by
using I/O’s or a fieldbus. The power supply is not fed from the position controller but
the information on desired speed, position or torque is. A position controller is
connected to the drive which runs the motor. [21]
Page 47
47
Picture 15. ABB NextMove e100 motion controller. [21]
1.8.1.5 Other automation products
The following components are listed under Other automation components:
Pneumatic components, hydraulic drives and valves, mechanical linear & rotary
handling systems, machine-safety products, low-voltage products, machine-vision
systems and other automation equipment.
Page 48
48
1.9 Cost structure of a packaging machine produced in EMEA
In this part of the research, the Packaging machine cost structure is introduced in
more detail and with the total cost of a packaging machine in mind. As described
earlier, the packaging machinery industry is divided into eight (or nine if sector
Other is taken into account) different sectors, and each sector is split into three value
levels; low, medium and high. All levels are examined separately with the same
indicators. There are five different indicators which are under exploration:
The total cost of a packaging machine
The total cost of motion control products in a packaging machine
The total cost of motor drive products in a packaging machine
The total cost of PLC products in a packaging machine
The total cost of visualization components in a packaging machine
These five indicators appoint how the business is split inside the packaging
machinery. First, the total average cost of a machine is introduced and the ratio of
automation, which is divided into the five equipment groups mentioned before. The
only excluded group is the group named other automation components. This group
includes components such as pneumatic valves, machine-vision systems and other
mechanical components and, for that reason they are not eligible indicators for the
scope of this research.
After the total automation ratio is introduced, the four most important indicators;
motion control products, motor drive products, PLC products and visualization
component shares are introduced in more detail. The ratio of the indicator of the total
cost of a packaging machine in a certain sector is indicated in Euros. After looking
through all the machine value levels and machinery sectors, the four different
indicator ratios are summed together so the total cost of these indicators can be seen.
According to OACE, the highest production cost of a packaging machine in the High
Value machines is in the Cartoning Machinery sector with an average price of
300 000 Euros per machine. The lowest machine cost at High Value machine level is
Page 49
49
in Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery with an average of 100 000 Euros per
machine. The same formula continues in Medium Value machines where the highest
average cost is also in the Cartoning Machinery sector at 180 000 Euros and the
lowest in Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery with an average of 25 000
Euros per machine. In the Low Value machine sector, the highest average cost per
machine is also in the Cartoning Machinery together with Form, Fill & Seal
Machinery with an average cost of 70 000 Euros per machine and the lowest in
Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery with an average of 15 000 Euros per
machine. In general, there are four sectors which differ from the others with higher
machinery costs and these four sectors are: Bottling Line Machinery, Cartoning
Machinery, Filling & Dosing Machinery and Form, Fill & Seal Machinery. Each
sector’s average machine cost is shown in picture 16. The prices in packaging
machinery production are based on the actual figures of 2007. [13]
Picture 16. The average price of a packaging machine produced in EMEA according to
sector and machine value. [13]
050000
100000150000200000250000300000
Low Value Machine
Medium Value Machine
High Value Machine
Page 50
50
Four of the most relevant automation categories are collected from OACE and presented
in table 1. All categories have their own share in percentages for each packaging sector
but the source does not define how the share varies among different countries. The
shares are introduced in more detail in the next section. First the percentage of the sector
is introduced and then the share of the total cost in Euros.
Table 1. Average component share in Low, Medium and High Value Machine. [13]
Average component share of the total cost in Low Value Machine
sector Motion Control Motor Drives PLC Visualization
Bottling Line Machinery 7,2 % 0,9 % 1,8 % 2,4 %
Cartoning Machinery 3,5 % 1,3 % 2,7 % 1,0 %
Closing Machinery 1,7 % 1,6 % 3,0 % 1,3 %
Filling & Dosing Machinery 0,7 % 2,2 % 1,6 % 1,3 %
Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 3,5 % 1,0 % 5,0 % 2,4 %
Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 2,1 % 1,0 % 1,8 % 2,4 %
Palletising Machinery 1,3 % 2,5 % 0,5 % 0,5 %
Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 0,8 % 5,6 % 1,1 % 1,5 %
Other Packaging Machinery (average) 2,6 % 2,0 % 2,2 % 1,6 %
Average component share of the total cost in Medium Value Machine
Bottling Line Machinery 7,2 % 2,2 % 2,6 % 2,5 %
Cartoning Machinery 3,9 % 1,6 % 3,1 % 1,3 %
Closing Machinery 1,8 % 1,8 % 3,4 % 1,3 %
Filling & Dosing Machinery 1,1 % 2,5 % 2,5 % 1,6 %
Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 4,0 % 1,0 % 5,2 % 3,0 %
Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 2,2 % 1,3 % 1,8 % 2,4 %
Palletising Machinery 1,4 % 2,9 % 0,6 % 0,5 %
Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 0,8 % 3,0 % 1,2 % 0,9 %
Other Packaging Machinery (average) 2,8 % 2,0 % 2,6 % 1,7 %
Average component share of the total cost in High Value Machine
Bottling Line Machinery 7,2 % 2,3 % 2,7 % 2,6 %
Cartoning Machinery 4,0 % 1,7 % 3,2 % 1,4 %
Closing Machinery 2,5 % 2,2 % 3,6 % 1,4 %
Filling & Dosing Machinery 1,2 % 2,6 % 2,7 % 1,7 %
Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 4,8 % 1,3 % 5,4 % 2,7 %
Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 2,6 % 1,5 % 1,8 % 2,7 %
Palletising Machinery 1,7 % 3,0 % 0,6 % 0,7 %
Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 1,0 % 3,2 % 1,7 % 1,0 %
Other Packaging Machinery (average) 3,1 % 2,2 % 2,7 % 1,8 %
Page 51
51
1.9.1 Motion Control components in a packaging machine
The biggest motion control share is in the Bottling Line Machinery sector at all three
levels, Low, Medium and High, with the same percentage of 7,2 %. At the High Value
machine level, the smallest ratio is in the Wrapping & Bundling sector with 1 % share
of motion control products of the total cost of a machine. The position for that sector in
Medium Value machine level is the same, the low-end showing a 0,8 % share. Closing
Machinery is the smallest according to the percentage share in the low value machine
sector with a ratio of 0,7 % of motion control products. Picture 17 shows that the three
largest sectors are Bottling Line Machinery 14 400 Euros, Cartoning Machinery 12 000
Euros and Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 12 000 Euros when the total cost of motion
control products within a single machine are explored. These three sectors are the
largest at all three Low, Medium and High Value machine levels. The smallest at all
three levels is Wrapping & Bundling Machinery, where the total motion control share in
euros is 240 Euros in low, 720 Euros in medium and 1500 Euros in high value machine.
[13]
Picture 17. Total expenses of motion control products in a packaging machine produced
in EMEA by machine value level [13]
02000400060008000
10000120001400016000
Motion control components
Low Value Machine
Medium Value Machine
High Value Machine
Page 52
52
1.9.2 Motor Drive components in a packaging machine
Wrapping and Bundling Machinery has the highest motor drive share at all three levels,
5,6 % in low and 3 % in both Medium and High Value machines. The share of Bottling
Line Machinery motor drives in the low value machine sector is only 0,9 % being the
smallest at that level. In Medium Value machines the smallest share is in Form, Fill &
Seal machinery. When the indicator is changed into Euros, the greatest sector in High
Value machines is Filling & Dosing machinery with 6370 Euros and the smallest
Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery at 1500 Euros per machine. As a matter of
fact, Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery is the smallest at all three levels and
Filling & Dosing Machinery the largest at all three levels. [13]
Picture 18. Total expenses of motor drive products in a packaging machine produced in
EMEA by machine value level. [13]
01000200030004000500060007000
Motor drives components
Low Value Machine
Medium Value Machine
High Value Machine
Page 53
53
1.9.3 PLC components in a packaging machine
Form Fill & Seal Machinery has the highest share of PLC components followed by
Closing, Cartoning and Bottling Line Machinery. The total expenses of PLC
components for the High Value Form, Fill & Seal machinery are 13 500 Euros and 9600
Euros for Cartoning Machinery. Palletising Machinery has the lowest PLC components
in all three machinery types, 200 Euros in Low, 407 Euros in Medium and 720 Euros in
High Value machinery. [13]
Picture 19. Total expenses of PLC products in a packaging machine produced in EMEA
by machine value level. [13]
02000400060008000
100001200014000
Aks
elin
ots
ikko
Akselin otsikko
Low Value Machine
Medium Value Machine
High Value Machine
Page 54
54
1.9.4 Visualisation components in a packaging machine
Form Fill & Seal Machinery and Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery have a
share of 2,7 % and Bottling Line Machinery has a share of 2,6 % in visualisation
components in High Value machines. Palletising Machinery has the lowest share in all
three machine types, 0,5 % in Low and Medium, 0,7 % in High Value machines. The
total expenses of visualisation components for the High Value Form, Fill & Seal
Machinery are 6750 Euros, 5200 Euros for Bottling Line Machinery and 4200 Euros for
Cartoning Machinery. [13]
Picture 20. Total expenses of Visualisation components in a packaging machine
produced in EMEA by machine value level. [13]
01000200030004000500060007000
Aks
elin
ots
ikko
Akselin otsikko
Low Value Machine
Medium Value Machine
High Value Machine
Page 55
55
2. Methodology
In this study, market research and interviews were used to answer the study questions.
Market research was utilized to gain information required for investigating the multi-
axis solutions of packaging machinery in Europe. Market research was combined to
gain figures as precise as possible. Neither of the market research data used examines
the actual share of the multi-axis solutions. The interviews were designed in
collaboration with ABB staff and the main purpose was to gain up-to-date information
from the packaging machine manufacturers. One questionnaire was sent to ABB Italy,
the target of which was to expand the perspective by getting information from the
second biggest packaging machine manufacturer in Europe.
2.1 Research on the potential market share for multi-axis
solutions in packaging machinery in Europe
To arrive at an estimation of the future, and how to find numbers that could define the
markets for the multi-axis products in the packaging machinery, the existing research
data has to be modified carefully but with expectations to find out how much the
revenues could be in a certain sector and country. In the MPYB research the total
machinery production in Europe is divided into machinery business fields, as shown in
table 2. The revenues in table 2 for 2008, 2009 and 2010 are genuine and after 2010
they are based on predictions with estimated CAGR. Packaging machinery is
highlighted in light green. First, the revenues in MPYB were examined after 2010 for
the first half of 2011 with the result that the economy seemed to have risen slowly but in
November 2011, MPYB updated the estimation. The first prediction for 2011 and years
onwards from that point showed that the recovery was slow but the update at the end of
2011 made some corrections to the numbers. One essential point was that it looked as if
Italy was going to take first position in the packaging machinery business in Europe, but
the update saw the position fall back to second place after Germany.
Page 56
56
Table 2. European production of Machinery. [14]
European Production of Machinery
Revenues (€M) 2008 to 2015
Machine Type 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 CAGR
10 - 15
Agricultural Machinery 29202,6 23042,5 25407,2 27692,9 29099,1 30225,5 31214,4 32214,5 4,9%
Food & Bev & Tobacco Machinery 21742,1 17869,8 19999,7 22019,9 23371,0 24560,2 25660,9 26791,0 6,0%
Furnaces & Furnace Burners 4774,2 4043,4 4480,3 4891,5 5150,0 5364,3 5552,8 5739,7 5,1%
Machine Tools 25922,6 18052,0 20048,9 22124,8 23156,4 23979,9 24674,8 25310,5 4,8%
Materials Handling 62053,0 49425,2 54620,8 59914,7 63460,6 66529,2 69282,4 72090,4 5,7%
Packaging Machinery 14934,3 12148,9 13544,9 14824,3 15590,1 16202,5 16732,4 17259,2 5,0%
Paper & Paperboard Machinery 9748,4 7335,0 8051,7 8743,6 9176,6 9524,6 9814,4 10104,1 4,6%
Printing Machinery 10084,8 7589,9 8411,1 9108,5 9503,0 9810,8 10048,2 10284,9 4,1%
Robotics 2683,1 1897,2 2083,4 2260,8 2360,1 2433,0 2491,9 2546,4 4,1%
Rubber & Plastics Machinery 13584,9 10070,8 11160,2 12131,6 12681,6 13105,3 13446,3 13775,7 4,3%
Semiconductor Machinery 4369,5 2912,7 3927,7 4302,1 4676,4 4852,5 5035,6 5379,4 6,5%
Textile Machinery 12395,3 8991,6 9841,4 10632,3 11044,1 11354,7 11606,9 11845,4 3,8%
Woodworking Machinery 6925,0 4929,6 5485,1 5984,3 6274,0 6502,3 6700,1 6894,7 4,7%
Other Machinery 152575,2 120687,6 132721,0 144608,8 152298,9 158652,8 164190,7 169638,0 5,0%
Revenues (€ M) 370 995 288 996 319 783 349 240 367 842 383 098 396 452 409 874 5,1%
Table 3 represents the total markets for automation products in Europe. The category of
Other Machinery has the largest share with an annual 6 093 Million Euros in revenues
for automation products. The Other Machinery category contents in the business sector
includes the following machine types; Commercial HVAC, Commercial, Service, Etc.,
Electronics & Electronics Assembly, Flat Panel Display, Medical & Scientific,
Metalworking (Excluding machine Tools), Mining and Oil & Gas.
The second biggest share in automation products in European machine manufacturing is
held by Machine Tools with almost 3 000 Million Euros in annual revenues which is
followed by Food, Beverage & Tobacco Machinery with 2 811,8 Million Euros and
Materials Handling with 2 745,4 Million Euros. The fifth biggest (fourth individual
sector if Other Machinery is not taken into consideration) share is held by Packaging
Machinery with 2 594,1 Million Euros and 11,0 %.
The aforementioned machine types are clearly the highest in revenues. The second
largest sector after packaging is Rubber & Plastics Machinery with 1 586,5 million
Page 57
57
Euros in revenues being only a little more than half of the packaging sector. The update
in MPYB in November 2011 did not change the figures for automation or any other
products inside the Machine type sector.
Table 3. The European Market for Automation Products in Machinery in 2010. [14]
The European Market for Automation Products in Machinery in 2010
(Millions of €)
Machine Type Automation Market % Share
Agricultural Machinery 508,2 2,2%
Food, Beverage & Tobacco Machinery 2811,8 12,0%
Furances & Furnace Burners 62,7 0,3%
Machine Tools 2988,1 12,7%
Materials Handling 2745,4 11,7%
Packaging Machinery 2594,1 11,0%
Paper & Paperboard Machinery 611,9 2,6%
Printing Machinery 1000,9 4,3%
Robotics 468,8 2,0%
Rubber & Plastics Machinery 1585,6 6,7%
Semiconductor Machinery 443,5 1,9%
Textile Machinery 1141,6 4,9%
Woodworking Machinery 455,3 1,9%
Other Machinery 6093,1 25,9%
Revenues (€ M) 23511,0 100 %
In the theory section, the automation share was divided into different sectors with the
share in Euros and percentages for certain sectors in packaging machinery production,
which are based on OACE categorization. MPYB divides the automation sector in a
different way, and for further investigation these two ways are combined. The reason
being that OACE’s genuine numbers end at 2007 and from then onwards, the revenues
are based on predictions. Usually predictions provide a good starting point for closer
examination but after 2007, Europe and actually the whole global economy have
suffered a great recession, which turned the production curves steeply downwards and
this was not taken into consideration when the predictions were made.
Pictures 21 and 22 represent the automation categorization under packaging machinery
between OACE and MPYB research. The category definition in picture 22 is also a
Page 58
58
general definition for the automation of all the machinery types examined in MPYB, for
example for Agricultural machinery, Robotics and every other type mentioned in table
3. Picture 21 is the definition according to OACE which divides automation into five
different groups where MPYB has done the same with six groups in picture 22.
Picture 21. Packaging machinery automation definition according to OACE.
Picture 22. Packaging machinery automation definition according to the MPYB.
Packaging machinery - Automation
PLC Motor Drives Visualisation Components
Motion Control Other Automation
Equipment
Packaging machinery - Automation
Motors & Drives Mechanics for electric drive
systems Hydraulics
Automation and Motion Control
Products Pneumatics
Linear & Rotary Handling
Equipmen
Page 59
59
As mentioned previously, OACE gives genuine numbers in revenues only up to the year
2007, which was followed by the great recession beginning at the end of 2008. MPYB
genuine numbers are valid up to 2010 and the predictions were updated in November
2011. From then onwards the numbers for further examination are taken from the
MPYB but the categorization for automation components is according to the OACE
definition. For 2007 packaging machinery production, OACE states that the total
production in EMEA was up to 13,8 Billion Euros and the prediction for 2008 was 14,6
Billion (CAGR 5,9%). According to table 2, production in Europe in the packaging
machinery business was 14,9 Billion Euros in 2008 showing that the economy has been
rising fast; exceeding even the OACE predictions. To verify that these two studies can
be combined, the comparison is made with the annual revenues in the packaging
machinery production business. The only defect in the comparison is that OACE
handles EMEA where the MPYB states revenues only from Europe. With the lack of
newer research for a deeper analysis in the packaging business, further predictions have
to be made using as up-to-date revenues as possible and existing data for the share of
automation components.
The share in packaging production for the Middle East & Africa is relatively small
because the OACE prediction for 2008 for the Middle East & Africa is 200 M€. The
total share in percentages is 1,37 %;
While the MPYB only looks at production in Europe, the share for the Middle East &
Africa has no great part in the total production in packaging machinery. In OACE
research, a certain component share in percentages in a machine is an average of the
total production, which reduces the value of missing Middle East & Africa. The
research (OACE) does not explain how the component share occurs by country, only
the averages per sector are available. In the later part of this thesis, the Middle East and
Africa, as well as every non-European country are ignored.
Page 60
60
2.2 The combination of the studies
Picture 23 shows the description of how the share of the possible multi-axis market
share was explored for each country and packaging machinery sector. The starting point
was that the ratio for automation components in a sector and country was already
known but revenues were unreliable because of long-term predictions and fluctuations
in the economy in recent years. The total production of packaging machinery in 2007
and the ratio of automation in a specific sector are based on OACE numbers. After the
automation ratio in a certain country and of a certain sector was known, the share was
converted into percentages instead of Euros. The latest revenues were taken from the
MPYB which were multiplied with the shares of motion control products in packaging
machinery production in EMEA.
Picture 23. The combination of the studies
Multi-axis revenues for
Country Sector
New revenues
Share of single or multi-axis Sub-component estimation
MPYB revenues x OACE definition
Country Sector Share of automation
Automation component ratio in
Country Sector
OACE
Machinery production revenues in 2007 Automation component share in revenues
Page 61
61
In MPYB the countries were divided more specifically than they were in OACE where
some of the countries were combined. In table 4, the countries are split according to the
OACE division and in table 5 the same principle is applied according to the division by
MPYB. In this research the countries were grouped by the MPYB definition, which did
not combine any other countries except the UK & Ireland and the Rest of Europe &
CIS. The countries that were combined in the OACE study, for example Austria and
Switzerland have been individually classified in the MPYB study as well as this study.
Table 4. EMEA packaging machinery production in 2007 according to OACE. [13]
The EMEA packaging machinery production in 2007
(Millions of €)
Country Packaging machinery production
Austria & Switzerland 896,9
Benelux 482,9
France 758,9
Germany 4553,4
Italy 3201,2
Nordic Countries 772,7
Spain & Portugal 827,9
Turkey 248,4
UK & Ireland 896,9
Central & Eastern Europe 538,1
Poland 193,2
Russian federation & CIS 262,2
Middle East & Africa 185,8
Revenues (€ M) 13 818,5
Page 62
62
Table 5. European packaging production according to MPYB. [14]
To gain a deeper analysis of the possible share of multi-axis solutions in the packaging
machinery business, the sectors and automation components need to be clarified. In
attachment 2, table 1 the total production in packaging machinery in EMEA in 2007
based on OACE, and the total revenues for automation according to the Medium Value
Machine for each sector are shown. The share for Medium Value Machine was selected
according to OACE and the total share is shown in attachment 2 in the last row in table
1. In the same attachment, in table 2 is the share of individual packaging sectors in
percentages for each country. For example, Germany has the total production for
Cartoning Machinery of 667,8 Million Euros which is 14,67 % of the total packaging
production in the country. The total production rate can also be found in table 3; EMEA
European packaging production 2008 - 2015
(Millions of €)
Country 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Austria 264,5 203,6 217,6 238,1 254,0 267,9 281,2 293,2
Belgium 174,3 130,0 128,9 138,6 144,9 148,9 153,6 157,1
Czech Republic 29,5 22,9 26,1 28,7 31,4 34,6 38,2 42,5
Denmark 114,7 87,5 86,0 93,0 97,6 101,3 104,6 106,9
Finland 74,7 60,4 66,2 72,0 76,0 78,5 80,4 83,0
France 640,0 601,2 638,9 690,5 720,0 745,1 761,3 777,9
Germany 5 400,0 4 400,0 5 060,2 5 584,2 5 894,5 6 133,5 6 339,4 6 552,2
Greece 0,9 0,7 0,6 0,5 0,5 0,6 0,6 0,6
Hungary 29,3 22,7 32,1 39,1 44,1 49,1 55,0 61,4
Italy 3 827,0 3 229,0 3 629,4 3 985,2 4 160,6 4 281,3 4 384,2 4 476,4
Netherlands 321,3 278,6 311,7 329,3 340,1 351,0 361,3 371,2
Norway 80,7 84,0 87,5 93,4 98,2 101,5 104,3 107,0
Poland 36,3 18,3 20,6 23,1 25,4 27,6 30,1 32,5
Portugal 6,1 7,1 7,1 7,2 7,2 7,4 7,6 7,8
Spain 786,7 608,5 582,4 619,8 645,1 675,5 699,2 726,4
Sweden 498,8 322,8 353,5 388,3 409,8 425,1 440,0 452,2
Switzerland 517,0 443,5 479,6 511,4 532,5 557,7 572,3 588,6
Turkey 331,6 297,0 347,7 391,2 426,0 465,1 509,7 554,7
UK & Ireland 949,8 585,3 655,7 702,0 731,6 745,8 756,5 768,1
Rest of Europe & CIS 851,1 745,6 813,0 888,9 950,6 1 005,1 1 052,7 1 099,5
Total packaging production 14 934 12 149 13 545 14 824 15 590 16 203 16 732 17 259
Page 63
63
packaging machinery production in 2007 according to OACE but without the sector
share. It is very important to know how much the production ratio of a country for each
sector is because the additional information is based on that.
Attachment 3 Total automation share in revenues is a summary of the total revenues for
each packaging machinery sector for all automation components. For example the 0,7
Million Euros in Austria Bottling Line Machinery is an outcome of the following
variables:
Sector share in percentages of the total production in a country (attachment 2, table 2)
multiplied with the Medium Value Machine automation ratio (attachment 2, table 3)
multiplied with the country total packaging production (attachment 1, year 2008).
Revenues in the attachments are reduced into decimals if the value is given in Millions
(M) or in kilos (k) Euros.
Attachment 3 Total automation share in revenues is the first sheet where the revenues
are a result of the combination of OACE and MPYB. In attachment 1, Total packaging
machinery production in Europe according to MPYB is divided into four different
categories as in picture 24:
Picture 24. Packaging machinery categorization according to MPYB.
European packaging machinery production
Chemical &
Pharmaceutical
Personal Care
Food & Beverage
Other
Page 64
64
In attachment 3 Total automation share in revenues the categorization for packaging
sectors is no longer by MPYB because OACE gives more specified information for the
sectors and the sub-definition for the automation components used in a packaging
machine. Only the total revenues from MPYB are investigated and used with the
multipliers taken from OACE. The same categorization was already introduced in
chapter 1.9 where the categories were explored with the main automation components;
Visualization components, PLC’s, Motion Control and Motor Drives. Picture 25
clarifies the packaging machinery production by dividing it into smaller sectors.
Picture 25. Packaging machinery categorization according to OACE.
Attachment 4, Motion Control component revenues, indicates the total summary of
motion control products in Europe in each country and sector. The revenues starting
from 2008 up to 2010 are genuine according to the MPYB and for 2011 – 2015 the
predictions were updated in November 2011. The revenues in attachment 4 are given in
thousands of Euros (k€) because of the better appearance instead of using Millions or
standard numbers. Revenues in attachment 4 are calculated with the following formula:
Average Motion Control share in percentages of the total automation share for medium
value machine in a sector multiplied with the total automation share in revenues
For example Austria’s Motion Control revenues in 2008 for Bottling Line Machinery
are calculated with the following variables:
European packaging machinery production
Bottling Line Machinery
Cartoning Machinery
Closing Machinery
Filling & Dosing
Machinery
Form, Fill & Seal
Machinery
Labelling, Decorating & Coding
Machinery
Palletising Machinery
Wrapping & Bundling
Machinery
Other Packaging Machinery
Page 65
65
The same principle is applied to all the countries and sectors using the Medium Value
Machine Motion Control share from attachment 2, table 4. The Motion Control part in
attachment 2 in table 4 is highlighted in green.
This section of the thesis explores the main automation components more specifically
and the most interesting part, the categorization of Motion Control, is expanded into
five sub-components in picture 26. The category of Motion Control is the most
interesting because it includes the components that are related to multi-axis solutions.
Obviously, the multi-axis solution includes many other components as well but the main
controlling components, excluding PLC’s, are located under the Motion Control
category. The Motion Control category is divided into Servo Drives, Servo Motors,
Stepper Drives, Stepper Motors and Position Control. In order to put the sub-
components in order of importance, Servo Motors, Servo Drives and Position Control
drives pass Stepper Motors and Stepper Drives. The reason for this order is that
normally servo products use higher supply voltage, which means greater power and
torque, making these components more important in a machine. The more important
components are usually performing more demanding tasks with very high speed and
accuracy. The nature of packaging machines is that the small components in power and
torque are normally performing supporting tasks which are not that significant for the
controlling of the whole machine. The sub-component Position Control is also a very
important part of the research because in multi-axis solutions the position control can
manage multiple axes simultaneously. Stepper Motors and Stepper Drives do not play a
great role in packaging machine controlling but of course they are also important
components, as in a multi-axis solution, a Position Control component can be the device
that controls those too. Despite the varying importance of the components inside the
Motion Control category, all the components are tightly related to each other.
Page 66
66
Picture 26. Motion Control sub-components. [13]
The outcomes in attachment 5 Revenues for sub-components are shown in thousands of
Euros per year and per sector for each country. The basis for attachment 5 is attachment
4 where each sector outcome was an outcome of the Medium Value Machine Motion
Control share multiplied with the total automation share per country and sector. In
attachment 5, the five sub-components under Motion Control (Picture 26) are based on
the estimation of the possible share of packaging machines. The total sum of the five
sub-components is 100 % where the ratio of certain sub-components can be modified
with the limitation that the total sum equals 100 %. In electrical form, attachment 5 can
be used as a prediction tool to create a vision of potential revenues for the selected sub-
component in a selected country and sector.
The revenues were based on true numbers between 2008 and 2010 and attachment 5
continues with the same form. Revenues starting from 2011 are based on predictions
made by the MPYB. In the printed version of attachment 5 the shares for each sub-
component are given according to percentages in table 6. The share for each sub-
component is based on discussions with ABB staff. There is no accurate research
available which defines the ratio between sub-components. Therefore, the estimation is
made analyzing a single component’s price and the number included in a packaging
machine. The global market share of a single servo drive in all machinery was 55 % and
45 % for multi-axis servo drives in 2010. The definition of multi-axis drives was that
each drive is fed by a common DC bus and each drive has a unique output [12]. The
typical price for a 400 W servo drive sold in Finland is approximately 400 – 600 Euros
Motion Control
Stepper Motors
Servo Drives
Stepper Drives
Servo Motors
Position Control
Page 67
67
including a serial- or EtherNet-based fieldbus. The average power distribution in
quantities for servo drives in EMEA in all machinery is mainly focused on powers 400
W – 3700 W [11]. A servo motor with 1-2 Nm nominal torque including an absolute
encoder is worth 500 – 700 Euros per piece and the unit price of a position controller
can be as high as 1000 – 2000 Euros [26]. Stepping motors and drives are worth
approximately 10 - 15 % of servo products (50 – 90 €). The average size for stepping
products is just 0,3 Nm. [27] Table 19 represents the estimated shares for the sub-
components according to the given information. Table 6 is used as a multiplier for the
revenues in attachment 4 and the results are shown in attachment 5.
Table 6. Estimated shares of the sub-components in packaging machinery under Motion
Control
Sub-component Share
Servo Motors 30 %
Servo Drives 30 %
single-axis 55 %
multi-axis 45%
Stepper Motors 5 %
Stepper Drives 5 %
Position Control 30 %
Total 100 %
Page 68
68
2.2 Company Interviews
Part of the data was collected by interviewing people who are working in a packaging
related business, in a company that produces packaging machines or in a company that
designs automation for packaging machinery. The interviewed companies were mainly
from Finland, excluding one which was from Italy. The Italian company preferred to
remain anonymous but allowed the use of the collected data. All the other interviewed
companies approved the use of their names and answers in public for the purposes of
this research.
Each company was asked to respond to 30 different questions which were composed in
collaboration with ABB staff supervising the research. The purpose of the questions was
to find out what the requirements of the multi-axis solutions are and what kind of trends
there are in the packaging industry. The interview was emailed to respondents who were
selected in advance by calling them and introducing the intention of the research and the
questions. The common feature for selected customers is that none of them are using
ABB products in their machines, excluding the company from Italy.
The interview was divided into two different sections with different questions. The first
15 questions were used to find out the current company policy on packaging machinery
automation. The remaining 15 questions were used to map out the future plans and
possible trends in the packaging industry. The aim was to gain a comprehensive view of
future automation in packaging machinery which is why not all of the questions were
related to multi-axis solutions. The questionnaire is introduced below. Only the
questions are introduced in this chapter. All the answers including the questions are
presented in attachments 6 – 10.
Page 69
69
2.2.1 The current situation
The first 4 out of 15 questions shed light on the current solution and the possible
competitors for component suppliers. The fourth question yields information on the
used fieldbus without revealing the drive manufacturer. However, if the protocol is
known it is easy to equate with a certain manufacturer. If the Profibus or Profinet
fieldbus is used, the manufacturer can be equated with Siemens but if the EtherCat
fieldbus is used, the supplier could be one of many. Obviously Profibus and Profinet are
also available from other manufacturers but both being invented by Siemens make their
use natural. Other manufactures might use other busses in place of Profinet or Profibus.
Questions 5 – 9 represent the desired power in motor shafts, voltage, electrical
connections and targets for energy saving in the packaging industry. Question 10 – 15
clarify the main tasks of motors and used feedback devices integrated to the motor,
issues that a respondent feels unable to execute with the current supplier or by using
some other supplier. The last question, number 15, is very open in style and leaves
space for the respondent.
2.2.1.1 Questions related to the current solution
Existing concept in a packaging machine
1. The hierarchy of controlling products in existing machinery (PLC, servo
drives, drives and HMI) and the main suppliers?
2. The main reasons for selected suppliers?
3. What is/was the main reason for hierarchy selection?
4. What is the main fieldbus protocol in the existing machine?
5. The range of average drive powers, minimum-maximum?
6. Most used supply voltage for the drives?
7. Resistor or regenerative braking method?
8. Does your company or your customer have any targets regarding energy
saving?
Page 70
70
9. Is the common DC supply method used in the existing machine?
10. The average number of motor axis in a machine?
11. Main type of feedback from motor?
12. Main tasks of the axes?
13. Are there any specialties in the controlling of the machine that other
suppliers are unable to provide?
14. Are there any desired features that the present supplier is unable to provide?
15. Anything else related to controlling and multi-axis solution?
2.2.2 Future
The purpose of the following 15 questions was to gain the latest information about the
requirements in packaging machinery automation and the possible solutions completed
with multi-axis systems. Any signals on future plans, trends and changes in the
packaging industry were welcomed information.
The first three questions clarify the possible architecture in packaging machinery
automation. The most critical components are the most interesting, so with these
specific questions they can be clarified. Questions 4 – 9 show the powers, voltages,
possible braking units, energy saving importance and possible need for regenerative
inverter supply units in packaging machinery. Questions 10 and 11 are the same as they
were for the questions related to the current solution. Number 12 can be considered a
very modern question, as safety really is an issue for the manufacturers today.
Nowadays the safety components, or at least some of them, can be integrated to the
motor controller. This is nothing new but it is increasingly important to know what
these safety features are, for example safe speed, safe stop and many others. Machine
safety is not dealt with in detail here but the information on desired features of the
future must be known when a manufacturer makes decisions regarding the next vendor.
Page 71
71
2.2.2.1 Questions related to future solutions
Machines of the future or desired features under exploration
1. The desired hierarchy of controlling products
2. The main reason for multi-axis controlling selection?
3. What will be the main fieldbus protocol?
4. The range of average drive powers, minimum-maximum?
5. Supply voltage for the drives?
6. Is the common DC supply method a desired feature in the future? If yes,
why?
7. Desired feature for waste energy braking? Regenerative supply units?
8. The importance of energy saving in machine design?
9. The average number of motor axis in a machine?
10. Main type of feedback from motor?
11. Main tasks of the axes?
12. Desired safety features integrated into the drive?
13. Programming language and method?
14. Are there any other desired features such as remote controlling?
15. Specific features of the multi-axis controller?
Page 72
72
2.3 ABB Italy Interview
The interview was addressed to an ABB sales person in Sesto San Giovanni in Milano,
Italy. The ABB respondent is in charge of business in Italy related to the packaging
industry. Because the respondent from Italy is working for ABB instead of in packaging
manufacturing, the questionnaire was conducted in a different way. The following free
form questions were asked to gain an international perspective for the research instead
of just focusing on Finland.
2.3.1 Questions for ABB Italy
1. Trends in packaging machinery?
2. Italy’s packaging markets?
3. Multi-axis solutions in Italian packaging machinery?
4. Threats to ABB?
5. ABB potential in packaging machinery?
6. Free word?
Page 73
73
3. Results
This chapter presents the results gained from the market study and from the interviews.
The market study formed a comprehensive table including 900 sub-component values in
Euros. The table can be modified in electrical form, but the printed version lists the
countries in alphabetical order. Section 3.1 includes the total potential revenues for
servo drives and multi-axis drives for the 20 biggest countries and sectors.
3.1 Results of the market studies
In total 20 countries were examined and each of the countries have 9 different
packaging sectors and each sector was further refined to motion control products. The
motion control definition included 5 different components and their share of the total
motion control value is based on estimation. Picture 27 exemplifies the methodology of
the process flow.
Picture 27. Process flow.
20 Countries
9 packaging sectors
Motion Control
5 sub-components
900 values
Page 74
74
The results could be collected from 2008 up to 2015 but for this study the year selected
is 2013 due to the current time period, which has passed by the years 2008 – 2012 and
therefore is the first interesting period. The years 2014 and 2015 are also shown but the
order in the result tables is listed according to 2013. The second selection was the share
for components listed under motion control which were estimated to be in the following
order: Servo motors 30 %, Servo Drives 30 %, Position Control 30 %, Stepper Motors 5
% and Stepper Drives 5 %. The third factor, and actually a multiplier for multi-axis
examination is the ratio between single and multi-axis servo drives according to the
power supplying architecture. The revenues are displayed with 1 decimal place
precision in thousands of Euros. The 20 largest are presented in the results chapter and
additional information can be found in attachment 5.
Results from the market studies on servo drives (single and multi-axis) in 2013, show
that the largest sector is the Bottling Line Machinery located in Germany where the total
annual revenues for servo drives is 2 770,5 thousand Euros. The second biggest sector
can also be found in Germany and is Cartoning Machinery with 2 115,1 thousand Euros
followed by Italy with 1 949,7 thousand Euros in Cartoning Machinery. The first 14
positions are taken by Italy and Germany and the 15th
biggest country is Turkey, where
the total revenues for servo drives is 326,5 thousand Euros in Form, Fill & Seal
Machinery. In addition to Germany, Italy and Turkey there are only 4 other countries
among the 20 highest in revenues which are the UK & Ireland with Form, Fill & Seal
Machinery, 303,7 k€, Spain with Form, Fill & Seal Machinery, 296,5 thousand Euros
Rest of Europe & CIS with Form, Fill & Seal Machinery, 291,9 thousand Euros and
France with Cartoning Machinery, 268,2 thousand Euros. The first Nordic country on
the list is Sweden in 35th
position with 119,7 thousand Euros in revenues in Form, Fill
& Seal Machinery. Finland’s sector Other Packaging Machinery holds the 96th
position
with 22,1 thousand Euros. The last 7 positions are held by Greece with 0 in revenues in
the Wrapping & Bundling Machinery, Bottling Line Machinery and Palletising
Machinery sectors.
Table 7 shows the 20 biggest sectors and countries in descending order listed according
to the total revenues for servo drives in 2013. The order in 2014 revenues remains
unchanged for the first 13 countries and sectors. Turkey will overtake Germany’s
Palletising Machinery and Italy’s Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery in 2014
Page 75
75
and 2015. The rest of Europe & CIS countries’ Form, Fill & Seal Machinery will pass
Italy’s Bottling Line Machinery in 2014 and Spain’s Form, Fill & Seal Machinery in
2015. Germany’s Palletising Machinery is going to pass Italy’s Labelling, Decorating &
Coding Machinery in 2015. The winners and losers are indicated in different colors. If
the position has gone up the revenue is indicated in green. If the position has gone down
the revenue is indicated in red. If the position is unchanged the color is black. The color
is also black if the position has increased or decreased but the final position remains
unchanged.
Total revenues for position control and servo motor components are the same for servo
drives, due to the use of the same 30 % multiplier. Position control and servo motors are
not indicated in separate tables in the results.
Table 7. Estimated servo drive revenues for 2013
Servo drives revenues in k€
Country Sector 2013 2014 2015
1 Germany Bottling Line Machinery 2 770,5 2 863,5 2 959,6
2 Germany Cartoning Machinery 2 115,1 2 186,1 2 259,4
3 Italy Cartoning Machinery 1 949,7 1 996,5 2 038,5
4 Germany Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 1 892,4 1 955,9 2 021,5
5 Italy Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 1 391,2 1 424,7 1 454,6
6 Germany Closing Machinery 963,0 995,3 1 028,7
7 Germany Other Packaging Machinery 609,0 629,5 650,6
8 Germany Filling & Dosing Machinery 603,6 623,8 644,8
9 Italy Other Packaging Machinery 600,2 614,6 627,6
10 Germany Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 543,1 561,3 580,2
11 Italy Filling & Dosing Machinery 499,2 511,2 522,0
12 Italy Closing Machinery 487,3 499,0 509,5
13 Italy Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 333,6 341,7 348,9
14 Germany Palletising Machinery 330,4 341,5 353,0
15 Turkey Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 326,5 357,8 389,4
16 UK & Ireland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 303,7 308,0 312,7
17 Spain Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 296,5 306,9 318,9
18 Italy Bottling Line Machinery 294,9 301,9 308,3
19 Rest of Europe & CIS Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 291,9 305,7 319,3
20 France Cartoning Machinery 268,2 274,1 280,1
Page 76
76
Table 8 represents estimated revenues for multi-axis servo drives for the 20 biggest
countries and sectors. The table is nearly identical with table 7 excluding Germany’s
Palletising Machinery which has equal revenues to Italy’s Labelling, Decorating &
Coding Machinery in 2014.
Table 8. Estimated revenues of multi-axis servo drives for the 20 biggest countries and
sectors.
Multi-axis servo drives revenues in k€
Country Sector 2013 2014 2015
1 Germany Bottling Line Machinery 1 246,7 1 288,6 1 331,8
2 Germany Cartoning Machinery 951,8 983,7 1 016,8
3 Italy Cartoning Machinery 877,4 898,4 917,3
4 Germany Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 851,6 880,1 909,7
5 Italy Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 626,1 641,1 654,6
6 Germany Closing Machinery 433,4 447,9 462,9
7 Germany Other Packaging Machinery 274,1 283,3 292,8
8 Germany Filling & Dosing Machinery 271,6 280,7 290,2
9 Italy Other Packaging Machinery 270,1 276,6 282,4
10 Germany Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 244,4 252,6 261,1
11 Italy Filling & Dosing Machinery 224,6 230,0 234,9
12 Italy Closing Machinery 219,3 224,6 229,3
13 Italy Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 150,1 153,7 157,0
14 Germany Palletising Machinery 148,7 153,7 158,8
15 Turkey Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 146,9 161,0 175,2
16 UK & Ireland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 136,6 138,6 140,7
17 Spain Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 133,4 138,1 143,5
18 Italy Bottling Line Machinery 132,7 135,9 138,7
19 Rest of Europe & CIS Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 131,4 137,6 143,7
20 France Cartoning Machinery 120,7 123,3 126,0
Page 77
77
3.2 Results of the interviews
The following sections 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 introduce the results from the interviews of five
different companies in packaging machinery. Four companies were from Finland and
one from Italy. Company names are not published in this section. Two of the
respondents did not allow the use of their name in the research but the remaining three
can be found in attachments 6, 7 and 8.
3.2.1 Present concept
Three out of the five companies are using HMI as their user interface. One company
prefers PanelPC and one company did not mention anything about the user interface.
PLC was used in every company and one company mentioned the possibility of using a
separate motion controller in addition to PLC. Used fieldbuses were Ethernet
Powerlink, EtherCat, DeviceNet, Ethernet I/P, Profibus and one of the respondents
mentioned the integrated synchronous bus between devices. The most common
selection criterion for the present automation supplier was that the supplier is able to
supply all the components for machinery controlling. Price in used components was
important for one company, and one company mentioned the importance of a high
technical level in used components. The reason for hierarchy selection was not that
important but one respondent mentioned the flexibility of the used components. The
average drive power and motor torque varied between 200 W – 2000 W and 0,5 – 12
Nm excluding one company whose average power for drives was 5,5 – 7,5 kW. Four
out of five respondents reported that the main supply voltage for the drives is 400 VAC
and just one was using only three phase 220 VAC supply voltage. Three companies also
mentioned 1 phase 230 VAC. Possible waste energy is mainly fed to braking resistors in
all five concepts and excluding one, all others reported that the energy saving issue was
not important. Common DC-bus is a usual phenomenon as well as is the absolute
encoder integrated into the servo motor among four out of five respondents. The
number of used axes per machine varied from 1 – 20 pieces where the average was
Page 78
78
approximately 6 – 8 axes. One report indicated that the present automation supplier is
able to offer something that cannot be offered by any other. All other respondents felt
there were no such tasks in the machines that other suppliers could not take care of. For
multi-axis solutions, it was a matter of importance that all axes can be accessed from
one point.
3.2.2 Future concept
One company reports that the future hierarchy could include PanelPC instead of using
PLC, which could still remain an option, while all others are satisfied with the existing
solution. The possible move towards multi-axis solutions could be brought about by the
tasks requiring synchronization or strict requirements in the program loop, accuracy or
repeatability. All the respondents reported that the energy saving issue, motor and drive
powers and fieldbuses will remain the same as they are within the existing concept.
Common DC supply is not an issue for three of the respondents and the importance of
energy saving is unanimously zero but the machines have to comply with particular
directives. The amount of used axes equals the amount in the existing concept excluding
one company in which induction motors will be increased in the future. In each concept,
the absolute multi-turn encoder is going to be the desired feedback in the future together
with STO safety functionality and public machinery safety directives and standards.
Ladder and structured text and all IEC-based programming languages are on the wish
list. Electrical and virtual axis function, memory card, remote access and CAM
functionality were the most desirable specific future features.
Page 79
79
3.3 Results from ABB Italy
Trends in Italy are moving towards compact products in servo motors and drives.
Therefore, the newest entrant is an integrated servo motor and drive, with a wide range
of possible fieldbuses, IP65 protection. Another important issue is a common PLC that
can drive both: motion control tasks and robot. Together with up-to-date products a
vendor needs to gain admittance onto the vendor list before they can be considered a
possible component supplier. The customers (packaging machine manufacturers) are
often working together with system integrators who also commit themselves to the
mechanics of the final product. ABB has decided to approach customers with system
integrators. In general, the Italian packaging machinery markets have recovered well
from the recession being the second biggest country in European production. For ABB
the mission is to get their name onto the vendor list as their name is seldom associated
with being a packaging machine manufacturer. In general, small OEM companies are
more willing to change their automation supplier than larger OEM’s. Big OEM
companies are strong in certain areas and focus on manufacturing specific types of
machines and the update of components rarely occurs. A change in the supplier of
automation products requires a great deal of work including drawings, cabinet lay-out
design, programming, mechanical compatibility, to name a few which take the time and
money of the machine manufacturer. But smaller OEM’s live more for the moment as
they have to be more conformable with the smaller volume and they often search new
vendors for their machine components to differentiate themselves from the mass
production companies.
During 2011 and 2012, the markets experienced a huge growth but the first half of 2013
is predicted to remain steady with no ups or downs. The second half of 2013 is
predicted to see better growth but possibly not in multi-axis solutions. Multi-axis
solutions are not that popular because of the possibility of long downtime in the process.
Multi-axis solutions are vulnerable because if a single component is broken the whole
system collapses. Regenerative solutions are not interesting since the inertias in
packaging machinery are relatively small but in the future the directives might be
tightened.
Page 80
80
ABB has a great portfolio with which to access any kind of industrial field but the
packaging machinery is a new business area for them. ABB is the last entrant which sets
challenges to plausibility. In addition to ABB, there are only a few suppliers who are
capable of providing such a wide range of components, including a robot. A packaging
line usually has a robot or several robots. Siemens being a multinational group is a very
tough competitor but they do not offer robots unlike ABB. Siemens is capable of
providing all other parts of the packaging line, including motion control and multi-axis
solution together with gearboxes, motor drives, not forgetting visualization components
and PLC. A lack of synchronous fieldbus is also an issue that reduces Siemens’
customer base as they only provide the ProfiNet fieldbus for motion control products.
The speed of the ProfiNet fieldbus is more than enough but the protocol does not
support synchronization in the same way as EtherCat, which is the primary fieldbus
type in ABB products. At least in Italy, the main focus area for Siemens is not the
packaging industry, even if the group already has many customers in a related business
area.
Page 81
81
4. Analysis
This chapter examines results from the main research where the multi-axis solution
market was investigated. The latest information about packaging machinery was gained
through interviews. The reliability of the results depends on the method of
interpretation. A user can define the possible sub-components by replacing the
percentages. Sources were up-to-date and the interviews were conducted to real life
users. However, there is no guarantee of the final results being perfect but at least they
lead the possible business in the right direction. The only uncertain single result is the
total market potentiality for multi-axis solutions in a certain sector and country. A lot of
information was gained from the sources but there is not one indicator that could define
the exact amount of multi-axis controllers in a certain machine or even in a certain
industrial field. It is noteworthy that two different kinds of research were combined in
this study to find out the possible amount of multi-axes potential. The accuracy of the
results is also reduced because the research of automation components in packaging
machinery did not yield information on how the machinery construction varies between
different countries. Only the average production price was indicated. An example for
the Bottling Line: the rate of motion control products in a medium value machine was
7,2 % in every country in EMEA. That the same ratio is used in general over EMEA
could be disputed. It is very likely that an average packaging machine produced in
Finland would be more complicated than a machine produced for example in a less
industrialized country. Some countries can be called high technology countries and
usually high technology means more complicated but not necessarily more difficult to
use. There is no doubt that if the share of a particular category has changed during the
past few years the definition could also be expanded with a specific multiplier for each
country.
Germany and Italy are clearly the biggest countries in packaging machinery in many
sectors and the trend will continue if predictions hold true. In 2013 Germany holds 7
places on the top ten list and the remaining 3 are taken by Italy. The 10th
biggest was
Germany’s Labelling, Decorating and Coding Machinery, which was only 19 % of the
biggest. France’s Cartoning Machinery position was 20th,
which is less than 10 %.
Page 82
82
Nordic countries are interesting of course but the first on the list is Sweden in 35th
position indicating that the potential markets are elsewhere in Central-Europe. Turkey
was a bright spot on the list, and actually it is predicted that Turkey’s CAGR in
packaging machinery is almost 10 %. Turkey’s estimated packaging production for this
year (2013) is 465 Million Euros, and if the growth continues Turkey’s packaging
machinery production will be almost the same as in France and Switzerland. A
remarkable issue is that in 2008 Sweden’s total packaging revenues were just under 500
Million Euros while Turkey’s total packaging machinery revenues were just over 300
Million Euros. For this year it has been predicted that Sweden’s total packaging
revenues will be 425 Million Euros.
The message gained from the interviews is that energy saving is not a desired
phenomenon. The reason is obvious. Packaging machine inertias are relatively small
when the amount of waste energy is very low. A regenerative drive is usually more
expensive than a normal drive that can only supply waste energy into the braking
resistor. Every respondent stated that they are satisfied with the existing supplier. Of
course certain points exist where the present supplier could improve their range of
products but none of the respondents were willing to move on to another supplier. The
received data of both parts; present and future, did not bring out any special
requirements that ABB is unable to fulfill.
Page 83
83
5. Discussion and conclusions
This study verifies that a multi-axis system is not just a single component and therefore,
a lot of information is required from the other components that are strongly tied to the
multi-axis solution. The most difficult part is to estimate the component ratios under a
category. In this thesis there were 5 components that had to be defined.
The world of motion control includes many industrial fields where packaging
machinery is a big player. Predictions show APAC passing EMEA in motion control
products after a short period of time. But as mentioned in the research, the machinery
varies a lot between APAC and EMEA. In EMEA the machinery is more complicated
which results in higher unit price per machine and in a more advanced automation rate.
Packaging machinery is one of the fastest growing industrial fields in Europe. There are
several countries in EMEA that are growing fast, such as Turkey, the Czech Republic,
Hungary and Poland, which have almost the same annual growth level as in the
predictions on how motion control markets are developing in APAC. Still the potential
in those countries is relatively small excluding Turkey. For some reason the total
packaging production revenues in Poland were reported differently in OACE and the
MPYB. The latest update in the MPYB in November 2011 states that the total revenues
in Poland were only 36 Million Euros in 2008, while OACE reports that the total
packaging production was almost 200 Million Euros in 2007. It is not plausible that
such a drop in the total production occurred despite the hard years of 2008 and 2009.
Nevertheless, the revenues in the results are indicated as they were in the MPYB report.
The most typical automation components were introduced in the theory section. Despite
the fact that ABB is one of the few manufacturers capable of covering the whole
packaging line with their automation products, the market share for ABB in packaging
machinery is minimal. With the acquisition of Baldor Electric at the end of 2010 ABB's
motion control product offering was significantly expanded. Baldor’s merger with ABB
enabled the Group to compete with traditional motion control companies in not just the
packaging business area but also in many other areas. Baldor electronics is a famous
company in the Northern Americas, offering a wide portfolio of motion control products
in addition to many mechanical components oriented toward heavy industries.
Page 84
84
The safety issue is of the utmost importance, and as mentioned in the safety section,
there are 10 different EN safety standards for each sector. Every packaging machine
manufacturer has to design their machines according to these standards. One of the
interviewees reported that their machinery has to be designed according to the EN415-3,
where the machine has to stop within 1 second of receiving the safety signal. These
issues are tightened all the time and are very important information for component
suppliers such as ABB. Another important feature of the interviews was that every
respondent mentioned that they would prefer absolute encoders instead of using
resolvers or pulse encoders. In the section where the most typical automation
components were introduced, the most common motor model from ABB was shown in
the picture but it does not include an option for absolute encoders. The motors with
integrated absolute encoders became available at the time when Baldor merged with
ABB.
It was a strange coincidence that a similar interview study was simultaneously being
conducted in Italy. This was discovered at the very beginning of this study after the
short conversation about the questionnaire’s purposes and targets. The main thing,
however, is that studies are constantly under work around the globe but at some point
they should be joined together to compare possible strengths and weaknesses.
Attachment 5 can be used as a tool with which to predict possible revenues for different
components. The printed version is only related to motion control products but with
slight modification it could be used with other categories. The tool can also be used
with studies related to other industrial fields. The electronic format of the work is left
for the client’s future use. The accuracy of this research can be improved by gaining
more information from different countries. ABB is an enormous international
organization and this advantage position could be utilized in the acquisition of
information on different countries.
The revenues in the motion control section and packaging machinery are mainly the
results of OEM’s production. Baldor’s merge enabled ABB to be one of the strongest
vendors with regard to its product range, but the fact remains that almost all large OEM
customers have an existing list of approved vendors for certain components. From the
supplier point of view, it is an opportunity in gaining acceptance of their products by a
certain OEM. However, the first projects usually take a lot of time and require a lot of
Page 85
85
technical support in commissioning and programming. Therefore, the total income from
the project can be very low in the initial stages, and as mentioned previously, small
OEM’s are willing to change their suppliers more often than larger ones. For that reason
larger OEM customers are more attractive than smaller ones. A single success in
winning over a customer can mean that a supplier can gain a huge volume of component
orders for several years. The beginning for the automation component supplier can be
rocky when there is no income at all until the first customer is gained.
Page 86
86
REFERENCES
[1] Terhen Järvi-Kääriäinen, Margareetta Ollila. Toimiva pakkaus Hakapaino Oy 2007
[2] http://www.ipack.com/solutions/systems-integration/ Accessed 14.4.2013
[3] http://www.hse.gov.uk/food/package.html. Accessed 15.3.2013
[4] http://www.cedes-sa.com/de/assets/File/PDF/safebook/
SAFEBK_RM002B_EN_P.pdf. Accessed 3.4.2013
[5] Joseph F. Hanlon, Robert J. Kelsey, Hallie E. Forcinio. Handbook of package
engineering, third edition. Technomic Publishing 1998
[6] http://www.cen.eu/cen/AboutUs/vision/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 16.2.2013
[7] http://www.cen.eu/cen/AboutUs/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 16.2.2013
[8] http://www.cen.eu/cen/Products/EN/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 16.2.2013
[9] http://www.cen.eu/cen/Sectors/TechnicalCommitteesWorkshops/CEN
TechnicalCommittees/Pages/WP.aspx?param=6128&title=CEN/TC%20146. Accessed
18.3.2013
[10] http://www.cen.eu/cen/Sectors/TechnicalCommitteesWorkshops/CEN
TechnicalCommittees/Pages/Standards.aspx?param=6128&title=CEN/TC%20146.
Accessed 16.2.2013
[11] Jenalea Howell. The world market for motion controls. IMS 2011
[12] Antti Kuusela. Master Thesis Moniakselisten servokäyttöjen
järjestelmätopologioiden määritys. Aalto-yliopisto 2011
[13] Don Tait. (OACE) Opportunities for Automation Companies in the EMEA
Packaging Machinery Industry. IMS 2008
[14] Andrew Robertson. (MPYB) The European Machinery production yearbook –
2011 Edition. IMS 2011.
Page 87
87
[15] http://www05.abb.com/global/scot/scot209.nsf/veritydisplay/
4446f12da27ab972c1257ac500510c98/$file/1SBC125003C0205.pdf. Accessed
10.3.2013
[16] http://www05.abb.com/global/scot/scot201.nsf/veritydisplay/
12eadabf0ce37ba3c12576c00052026b/$file/ACS355generalmachinerysrives_catalog
_FI_REVA.pdf. Accessed 10.3.2013
[17] http://www.abb.com/product/seitp329/6b9c7e5f00fb4961c
125790600299bbc.aspx. Accessed 10.3.2013
[18] http://www05.abb.com/global/scot/scot201.nsf/veritydisplay/
4e8dbaddac6d252fc12575f200461a02/$file/msseries_servomotors%20catalog_en_revc
pdf.pdf. Accessed 28.3.2013
[19] http://www.baldormotion.com/products/servodrives/microflex_e150.asp.
Accessed 28.3.2013
[20] http://www.baldormotion.com/products/steppers/dsms.asp. Accessed 28.3.2013
[21] http://www.baldormotion.com/products/motioncontrol/nme100.asp Accessed
28.3.2013
[22] Gianpiero Leggieri, Sales Specialist ABB Italy. Telephone interview 25.2.2013
[23] http://www05.abb.com/global/scot/scot209.nsf/veritydisplay/
4446f12da27ab972c1257ac500510c98/$file/1SBC125003C0205.pdf. Accessed
28.3.2013
[24] http://www05.abb.com/global/scot/scot201.nsf/veritydisplay/
12eadabf0ce37ba3c12576c00052026b/$File/ACS355generalmachinerysrives_catalog_F
I_REVA.pdf. Accessed 28.3.2013
[25] http://www.doria.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/36496/nbnfi-
fe200803141155.pdf?sequence=3. Accessed 28.3.2013
[26] Ilpo Pinola, Sales Manager Movetec Oy. Interview 10.4.2013
[27] Kimmo Martti, Sales Manager Movetec Oy. Interview 10.4.2013
Page 88
Attachment 1 (1)
Total packaging machinery production in Europe
Revenues in M€
Motion Control component revenues Genuine revenues Predicted revenues 11/2011
Country sector 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 CAGR 2010-2015
Austria Chem & Pharm 59,5 45,8 48,8 53,3 56,7 59,6 62,4 64,9 5,9%
Austria Food & Bev 143,1 110,2 118,0 129,3 138,2 146,1 153,7 160,6 6,4%
Austria Personal Care 35,5 27,3 29,2 31,9 34,0 35,8 37,6 39,1 6,1%
Austria Other 26,4 20,4 21,7 23,6 25,1 26,3 27,5 28,5 5,7%
Austria Total 264,5 203,6 217,6 238,1 254,0 267,9 281,2 293,2
Belgium Chem & Pharm 39,2 29,3 28,9 31,1 32,4 33,2 34,2 34,9 3,8%
Belgium Food & Bev 94,8 70,7 70,2 75,6 79,2 81,5 84,2 86,3 4,2%
Belgium Personal Care 22,9 17,0 16,9 18,2 19,0 19,5 20,1 20,6 4,0%
Belgium Other 17,4 13,0 12,8 13,8 14,4 14,7 15,1 15,4 3,7%
Belgium Total 174,3 130,0 128,9 138,6 144,9 148,9 153,6 157,1
Czech Republic Chem & Pharm 6,6 5,2 5,9 6,4 7,0 7,7 8,5 9,4 10,1%
Czech Republic Food & Bev 14,6 11,4 12,9 14,3 15,7 17,3 19,1 21,3 10,5%
Czech Republic Personal Care 5,3 4,1 4,7 5,1 5,6 6,2 6,8 7,6 10,3%
Czech Republic Other 3,0 2,3 2,6 2,9 3,1 3,4 3,8 4,2 10,0%
Czech Republic Total 29,5 22,9 26,1 28,7 31,4 34,6 38,2 42,5
Denmark Chem & Pharm 25,8 19,7 19,3 20,8 21,7 22,5 23,1 23,5 4,1%
Denmark Food & Bev 62,1 47,4 46,6 50,6 53,2 55,3 57,2 58,6 4,7%
Denmark Personal Care 15,3 11,7 11,5 12,4 13,0 13,5 14,0 14,3 4,5%
Denmark Other 11,5 8,7 8,6 9,2 9,7 10,0 10,3 10,5 4,2%
Denmark Total 114,7 87,5 86,0 93,0 97,6 101,3 104,6 106,9
Finland Chem & Pharm 16,8 13,2 14,5 15,7 16,5 17,1 17,4 18,0 4,4%
Finland Food & Bev 40,3 31,7 34,8 37,9 40,1 41,5 42,6 44,0 4,8%
Finland Personal Care 10,2 8,0 8,8 9,5 10,0 10,4 10,6 11,0 4,6%
Finland Other 7,5 7,5 8,2 8,9 9,3 9,6 9,8 10,1 4,3%
Finland Total 74,7 60,4 66,2 72,0 76,0 78,5 80,4 83,0
France Chem & Pharm 148,1 139,1 147,7 159,5 166,2 171,8 175,5 179,1 3,9%
France Food & Bev 340,1 319,4 339,9 367,7 383,9 397,7 406,9 416,2 4,1%
France Personal Care 88,5 83,1 88,3 95,3 99,3 102,7 104,9 107,1 3,9%
France Other 63,4 59,6 63,1 67,9 70,6 72,8 74,1 75,4 3,6%
France Total 640,0 601,2 638,9 690,5 720,0 745,1 761,3 777,9
Germany Chem & Pharm 1 215,0 990,0 1 137,0 1 253,0 1 320,7 1 372,2 1 416,1 1 461,4 5,1%
Germany Food & Bev 2 905,2 2 367,2 2 725,8 3 012,0 3 183,7 3 317,4 3 433,6 3 553,7 5,4%
Germany Personal Care 739,8 602,8 692,9 764,3 806,3 838,6 866,3 894,8 5,2%
Germany Other 540,0 440,0 504,5 554,9 583,8 605,4 623,5 642,2 4,9%
Germany Total 5 400,0 4 400,0 5 060,2 5 584,2 5 894,5 6 133,5 6 339,4 6 552,2
Greece Chem & Pharm 0,3 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,9%
Greece Food & Bev 0,5 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 1,0%
Greece Personal Care 0,2 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,8%
Greece Other 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 -
Greece Total 0,9 0,7 0,6 0,5 0,5 0,6 0,6 0,6
Hungary Chem & Pharm 6,6 5,1 7,2 8,8 9,9 11,0 12,3 13,7 13,6%
Hungary Food & Bev 14,5 11,2 16,0 19,4 22,0 24,5 27,5 30,8 14,0%
Hungary Personal Care 5,2 4,1 5,7 7,0 7,9 8,8 9,8 11,0 13,8%
Hungary Other 2,9 2,3 3,2 3,9 4,4 4,9 5,4 6,0 13,5%
Hungary Total 29,3 22,7 32,1 39,1 44,1 49,1 55,0 61,4
Italy Chem & Pharm 861,1 726,5 814,4 891,8 928,4 952,5 972,5 990,0 4,0%
Italy Food & Bev 2 071,9 1 748,2 1 968,5 2 165,3 2 264,9 2 335,1 2 395,8 2 450,9 4,5%
Italy Personal Care 511,3 431,4 484,9 532,4 555,8 572,0 585,7 598,0 4,3%
Italy Other 382,7 322,9 361,6 395,6 411,5 421,8 430,2 437,5 3,9%
Italy Total 3 827,0 3 229,0 3 629,4 3 985,2 4 160,6 4 281,3 4 384,2 4 476,4
Netherlands Chem & Pharm 72,3 62,7 70,0 73,8 76,1 78,4 80,5 82,6 3,4%
Netherlands Food & Bev 114,8 99,5 111,5 118,0 122,1 126,3 130,3 134,1 3,8%
Netherlands Personal Care 102,1 88,6 99,1 104,7 108,1 111,6 114,9 118,0 3,6%
Netherlands Other 32,1 27,9 31,1 32,7 33,7 34,7 35,6 36,5 3,3%
Netherlands Total 321,3 278,6 311,7 329,3 340,1 351,0 361,3 371,2
Norway Chem & Pharm 18,2 18,9 19,6 20,8 21,8 22,4 22,9 23,4 3,6%
Norway Food & Bev 38,1 39,7 41,5 44,5 46,9 48,7 50,3 51,7 4,5%
Norway Personal Care 16,3 17,0 17,7 18,8 19,7 20,3 20,8 21,3 3,8%
Norway Other 8,1 8,4 8,7 9,3 9,8 10,1 10,3 10,6 3,9%
Norway Total 80,7 84,0 87,5 93,4 98,2 101,5 104,3 107,0
Page 89
Attachment 1 (2)
Total packaging machinery production in Europe
Revenues in M€
Motion Control component revenues Genuine revenues Predicted revenues 11/2011
Country sector 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 CAGR 2010-2015
Poland Chem & Pharm 8,2 4,1 4,6 5,2 5,7 6,2 6,7 7,2 9,4%
Poland Food & Bev 18,0 9,1 10,2 11,5 12,7 13,8 15,0 16,3 9,8%
Poland Personal Care 6,5 3,3 3,7 4,1 4,5 4,9 5,4 5,8 9,6%
Poland Other 3,6 1,8 2,1 2,3 2,5 2,7 3,0 3,2 9,3%
Poland Total 36,3 18,3 20,6 23,1 25,4 27,6 30,1 32,5
Portugal Chem & Pharm 1,4 1,6 1,6 1,6 1,6 1,7 1,7 1,7 1,9%
Portugal Food & Bev 3,1 3,6 3,6 3,7 3,7 3,8 3,9 4,0 2,2%
Portugal Personal Care 1,0 1,2 1,2 1,2 1,2 1,2 1,3 1,3 2,0%
Portugal Other 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,7 0,7 0,7 0,7 0,8 1,7%
Portugal Total 6,1 7,1 7,1 7,2 7,2 7,4 7,6 7,8
Spain Chem & Pharm 187,3 144,9 138,4 147,0 152,7 159,6 164,8 170,9 4,3%
Spain Food & Bev 409,8 317,0 304,0 324,1 338,0 354,6 367,7 382,8 4,7%
Spain Personal Care 111,7 86,4 82,6 87,8 91,3 95,5 98,8 102,5 4,4%
Spain Other 77,9 60,2 57,4 60,9 63,1 65,8 67,9 70,2 4,1%
Spain Total 786,7 608,5 582,4 619,8 645,1 675,5 699,2 726,4
Sweden Chem & Pharm 112,2 72,6 79,4 87,0 91,6 94,8 97,9 100,4 4,8%
Sweden Food & Bev 266,7 172,6 189,3 208,2 220,1 228,7 237,1 244,0 5,2%
Sweden Personal Care 70,0 45,3 49,6 54,5 57,5 59,6 61,7 63,4 5,0%
Sweden Other 49,9 32,3 35,2 38,6 40,6 42,0 43,3 44,4 4,7%
Sweden Total 498,8 322,8 353,5 388,3 409,8 425,1 440,0 452,2
Switzerland Chem & Pharm 120,6 103,4 111,6 118,7 123,4 128,9 132,0 135,5 3,9%
Switzerland Food & Bev 270,3 231,9 251,2 268,3 279,8 293,5 301,7 310,8 4,3%
Switzerland Personal Care 74,6 64,0 69,2 73,8 76,8 80,4 82,5 84,8 4,1%
Switzerland Other 51,5 44,2 47,6 50,6 52,5 54,9 56,1 57,5 3,8%
Switzerland Total 517,0 443,5 479,6 511,4 532,5 557,7 572,3 588,6
Turkey Chem & Pharm 74,6 66,8 78,1 87,7 95,3 103,8 113,5 123,3 9,6%
Turkey Food & Bev 164,4 147,3 172,7 194,6 212,3 232,1 254,8 277,7 10,0%
Turkey Personal Care 59,4 53,2 62,2 70,0 76,2 83,2 91,2 99,2 9,8%
Turkey Other 33,2 29,7 34,7 38,9 42,2 46,0 50,2 54,5 9,5%
Turkey Total 331,6 297,0 347,7 391,2 426,0 465,1 509,7 554,7
UK & Ireland Chem & Pharm 213,7 131,7 147,2 157,3 163,5 166,3 168,3 170,5 3,0%
UK & Ireland Food & Bev 518,5 319,5 358,5 384,3 401,2 409,7 416,2 423,3 3,4%
UK & Ireland Personal Care 122,6 75,6 84,6 90,6 94,4 96,2 97,5 99,0 3,2%
UK & Ireland Other 95,0 58,5 65,4 69,8 72,5 73,6 74,5 75,3 2,9%
UK & Ireland Total 949,8 585,3 655,7 702,0 731,6 745,8 756,5 768,1
Rest of Europe & CIS Chem & Pharm 191,5 167,8 182,5 199,1 212,5 224,2 234,2 244,1 6,0%
Rest of Europe & CIS Food & Bev 476,7 417,6 456,0 499,3 534,8 566,3 594,1 621,4 6,4%
Rest of Europe & CIS Personal Care 97,8 85,7 93,4 102,1 109,1 115,4 120,8 126,1 6,2%
Rest of Europe & CIS Other 85,1 74,6 81,0 88,3 94,2 99,3 103,6 107,9 5,9%
Rest of Europe & CIS Total 851,1 745,6 813,0 888,9 950,6 1 005,1 1 052,7 1 099,5
Total packaging production 14 934,4 12 148,6 13 544,8 14 824,5 15 590,0 16 202,6 16 732,2 17 259,3
Page 90
Attachment 2 (1)
Packaging machinery production in EMEA in 2007
Packaging machinery production
Average automation share of the total cost in a machine
Average component share of the total cost in Medium Value Machine
Table 1
Packaging machinery production in EMEA in 2007
Country sector
Bottling line
machinery
Cartoning
Machinery
Closing
Machinery
Filling & Dosing
Machinery
Form, Fill & Seal
Machinery
Labelling,
Decorating &
Palletising
Machinery
Wrapping &
Bundling
Other Packaging
Machinery
M€ M€ M€ M€ M€ M€ M€ M€ M€
Austria & Switzerland 10,4 154,8 74,7 256 110,6 64,5 25,9 91,1 108,9
Benelux 6,3 68 97,2 109,9 36,8 30,4 17,6 47,4 69,4
France 24,9 116,2 131 214,4 71,9 34,5 31,9 58,1 76,1
Germany 408,6 667,8 739,7 930,1 477,8 328,4 352,1 350 299,1
Italy 43,8 620 377 774,8 353,8 203,2 119,4 412,5 296,9
Nordic Countries 9,1 54,3 135,6 183,5 74 65 10,4 105 135,9
Spain & Portugal 9,3 101,6 197,4 169,8 123,6 48,7 16,1 65,6 95,9
Turkey 8,6 12,1 12,9 71,8 59,3 30,4 9,9 14,4 28,9
UK & Ireland 15,3 111 115,8 192,8 124,2 81,9 32,7 102,5 120,8
Central & Eastern Europe 3,1 34 93,1 140,4 37,9 43 5,9 108 72,7
Poland 2,5 27,2 14,8 60,7 19,6 17,3 2,9 22,8 25,4
Russian federation & CIS 4,7 6,6 27,6 83,3 25,9 32,4 5,4 33,2 43,2
Middle East & Africa 6,1 37,2 9,1 37,4 55,5 20,2 7 4 9,4
552,7 2010,8 2025,9 3224,9 1570,9 999,9 637,2 1414,6 1382,6
Total revenues for automation 128,8 404,1 362,6 470,8 384,9 186 105,7 253,2 248,8
Table 2
Packaging machinery production
Country Sector share in percentages of the total production in a country
Bottling line
machinery
Cartoning
Machinery
Closing
Machinery
Filling & Dosing
Machinery
Form, Fill & Seal
Machinery
Labelling,
Decorating &
Coding
Palletising
Machinery
Wrapping &
Bundling
Machinery
Other Packaging
Machinery
% % % % % % % % %
Austria & Switzerland 1,16 17,26 8,33 28,54 12,33 7,19 2,89 10,16 12,14
Benelux 1,30 14,08 20,13 22,76 7,62 6,30 3,64 9,82 14,37
France 3,28 15,31 17,26 28,25 9,47 4,55 4,20 7,66 10,03
Germany 8,97 14,67 16,25 20,43 10,49 7,21 7,73 7,69 6,57
Italy 1,37 19,37 11,78 24,20 11,05 6,35 3,73 12,89 9,27
Nordic Countries 1,18 7,03 17,55 23,75 9,58 8,41 1,35 13,59 17,59
Spain & Portugal 1,12 12,27 23,84 20,51 14,93 5,88 1,94 7,92 11,58
Turkey 3,46 4,87 5,19 28,90 23,87 12,24 3,99 5,80 11,63
UK & Ireland 1,71 12,38 12,91 21,50 13,85 9,13 3,65 11,43 13,47
Central & Eastern Europe 0,58 6,32 17,30 26,09 7,04 7,99 1,10 20,07 13,51
Poland 1,29 14,08 7,66 31,42 10,14 8,95 1,50 11,80 13,15
Russian federation & CIS 1,79 2,52 10,53 31,77 9,88 12,36 2,06 12,66 16,48
Middle East & Africa 3,28 20,02 4,90 20,13 29,87 10,87 3,77 2,15 5,06
Table 3
Average automation share of the total cost in a machineMachine type
sector Low Medium High
Bottling Line Machinery 17,3 % 23,3 % 24,4 %
Cartoning Machinery 14,0 % 20,1 % 21,6 %
Closing Machinery 15,4 % 17,9 % 22,4 %
Filling & Dosing Machinery 11,0 % 14,6 % 17,3 %
Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 20,6 % 24,5 % 28,3 %
Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 14,7 % 18,6 % 21,3 %
Palletising Machinery 12,2 % 16,6 % 18,4 %
Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 17,5 % 17,9 % 24,8 %
Other Packaging Machinery 18,0 % 18,0 % 18,0 %
Table 4
Average component share of the total cost in Medium Value Machine
sector Motion Control Motor Drives PLC Visualization
Bottling Line Machinery 7,2 % 2,2 % 2,6 % 2,5 %
Cartoning Machinery 3,9 % 1,6 % 3,1 % 1,3 %
Closing Machinery 1,8 % 1,8 % 3,4 % 1,3 %
Filling & Dosing Machinery 1,1 % 2,5 % 2,5 % 1,6 %
Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 4,0 % 1,0 % 5,2 % 3,0 %
Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 2,2 % 1,3 % 1,8 % 2,4 %
Palletising Machinery 1,4 % 2,9 % 0,6 % 0,5 %
Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 0,8 % 3,0 % 1,2 % 0,9 %
Other Packaging Machinery (average) 2,8 % 2,0 % 2,6 % 1,7 %
Page 91
Attachment 3 (1)
Total automation share in revenues
Revenues in M€
Total automation share in revenues
Country sector 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Austria Bottling Line Machinery 0,7 0,6 0,6 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,8
Austria Cartoning Machinery 9,2 7,1 7,5 8,3 8,8 9,3 9,8 10,2
Austria Closing Machinery 3,9 3,0 3,2 3,5 3,8 4,0 4,2 4,4
Austria Filling & Dosing Machinery 11,0 8,5 9,1 9,9 10,6 11,2 11,7 12,2
Austria Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 8,0 6,2 6,6 7,2 7,7 8,1 8,5 8,9
Austria Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 3,5 2,7 2,9 3,2 3,4 3,6 3,8 3,9
Austria Palletising Machinery 1,3 1,0 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,3 1,4
Austria Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 4,8 3,7 4,0 4,3 4,6 4,9 5,1 5,3
Austria Other Packaging Machinery 5,8 4,4 4,8 5,2 5,5 5,9 6,1 6,4
Austria Total 48,2 37,1 39,7 43,4 46,3 48,9 51,3 53,5
Belgium Bottling Line Machinery 0,5 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,5 0,5 0,5
Belgium Cartoning Machinery 4,9 3,7 3,6 3,9 4,1 4,2 4,3 4,4
Belgium Closing Machinery 6,3 4,7 4,6 5,0 5,2 5,4 5,5 5,7
Belgium Filling & Dosing Machinery 5,8 4,3 4,3 4,6 4,8 4,9 5,1 5,2
Belgium Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 3,3 2,4 2,4 2,6 2,7 2,8 2,9 2,9
Belgium Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 2,0 1,5 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,7 1,8 1,8
Belgium Palletising Machinery 1,1 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,9 0,9 0,9 1,0
Belgium Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 3,1 2,3 2,3 2,4 2,5 2,6 2,7 2,8
Belgium Other Packaging Machinery 4,5 3,4 3,3 3,6 3,7 3,9 4,0 4,1
Belgium Total 31,5 23,5 23,3 25,0 26,2 26,9 27,7 28,4
Czech Republic Bottling Line Machinery 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,1 0,1
Czech Republic Cartoning Machinery 0,4 0,3 0,3 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,5 0,5
Czech Republic Closing Machinery 1,1 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,4 1,5
Czech Republic Filling & Dosing Machinery 1,1 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,5 1,6
Czech Republic Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 0,5 0,4 0,4 0,5 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,7
Czech Republic Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 0,4 0,3 0,4 0,4 0,5 0,5 0,6 0,6
Czech Republic Palletising Machinery 0,1 0,0 0,0 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Czech Republic Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 1,1 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,4 1,5
Czech Republic Other Packaging Machinery 0,7 0,6 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,9 1,0
Czech Republic Total 5,4 4,2 4,8 5,2 5,7 6,3 7,0 7,8
Denmark Bottling Line Machinery 0,3 0,2 0,2 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3
Denmark Cartoning Machinery 1,6 1,2 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,4 1,5 1,5
Denmark Closing Machinery 3,6 2,7 2,7 2,9 3,1 3,2 3,3 3,4
Denmark Filling & Dosing Machinery 4,0 3,0 3,0 3,2 3,4 3,5 3,6 3,7
Denmark Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 2,7 2,1 2,0 2,2 2,3 2,4 2,5 2,5
Denmark Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 1,8 1,4 1,3 1,5 1,5 1,6 1,6 1,7
Denmark Palletising Machinery 0,3 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2
Denmark Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 2,8 2,1 2,1 2,3 2,4 2,5 2,5 2,6
Denmark Other Packaging Machinery 3,6 2,8 2,7 2,9 3,1 3,2 3,3 3,4
Denmark Total 20,7 15,8 15,5 16,8 17,6 18,3 18,9 19,3
Finland Bottling Line Machinery 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2
Finland Cartoning Machinery 1,1 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,1 1,1 1,2
Finland Closing Machinery 2,3 1,9 2,1 2,3 2,4 2,5 2,5 2,6
Finland Filling & Dosing Machinery 2,6 2,1 2,3 2,5 2,6 2,7 2,8 2,9
Finland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 1,8 1,4 1,6 1,7 1,8 1,8 1,9 1,9
Finland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 1,2 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,2 1,3 1,3
Finland Palletising Machinery 0,2 0,1 0,1 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2
Finland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 1,8 1,5 1,6 1,8 1,8 1,9 2,0 2,0
Finland Other Packaging Machinery 2,4 1,9 2,1 2,3 2,4 2,5 2,5 2,6
Finland Total 13,5 10,9 11,9 13,0 13,7 14,2 14,5 15,0
Page 92
Attachment 3 (2)
Total automation share in revenues
Revenues in M€
Total automation share in revenues
Country sector 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
France Bottling Line Machinery 4,9 4,6 4,9 5,3 5,5 5,7 5,8 5,9
France Cartoning Machinery 19,7 18,5 19,7 21,2 22,2 22,9 23,4 23,9
France Closing Machinery 19,8 18,6 19,7 21,3 22,2 23,0 23,5 24,0
France Filling & Dosing Machinery 26,4 24,8 26,4 28,5 29,7 30,7 31,4 32,1
France Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 14,9 14,0 14,8 16,0 16,7 17,3 17,7 18,1
France Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 5,4 5,1 5,4 5,8 6,1 6,3 6,4 6,6
France Palletising Machinery 4,5 4,2 4,5 4,8 5,0 5,2 5,3 5,4
France Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 8,8 8,2 8,8 9,5 9,9 10,2 10,4 10,7
France Other Packaging Machinery 11,5 10,8 11,5 12,5 13,0 13,4 13,7 14,0
France Total 115,8 108,8 115,6 124,9 130,3 134,8 137,8 140,8
Germany Bottling Line Machinery 112,9 92,0 105,8 116,8 123,3 128,3 132,6 137,0
Germany Cartoning Machinery 159,2 129,7 149,1 164,6 173,7 180,8 186,8 193,1
Germany Closing Machinery 157,0 127,9 147,1 162,4 171,4 178,3 184,3 190,5
Germany Filling & Dosing Machinery 161,0 131,2 150,9 166,5 175,8 182,9 189,0 195,4
Germany Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 138,8 113,1 130,1 143,6 151,5 157,7 163,0 168,5
Germany Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 72,4 59,0 67,9 74,9 79,1 82,3 85,0 87,9
Germany Palletising Machinery 69,3 56,4 64,9 71,6 75,6 78,7 81,3 84,0
Germany Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 74,3 60,5 69,6 76,8 81,1 84,4 87,2 90,1
Germany Other Packaging Machinery 63,8 52,0 59,8 66,0 69,7 72,5 74,9 77,4
Germany Total 1 008,8 822,0 945,3 1 043,2 1 101,2 1 145,8 1 184,3 1 224,0
Greece Bottling Line Machinery 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Cartoning Machinery 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Closing Machinery 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Filling & Dosing Machinery 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Palletising Machinery 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Other Packaging Machinery 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Total 0,2 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Hungary Bottling Line Machinery 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Hungary Cartoning Machinery 0,4 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,6 0,7 0,8
Hungary Closing Machinery 0,9 0,7 1,0 1,2 1,4 1,5 1,7 1,9
Hungary Filling & Dosing Machinery 1,1 0,9 1,2 1,5 1,7 1,9 2,1 2,3
Hungary Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 0,5 0,4 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,9 1,1
Hungary Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 0,4 0,3 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,9
Hungary Palletising Machinery 0,1 0,0 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Hungary Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 1,1 0,8 1,2 1,4 1,6 1,8 2,0 2,2
Hungary Other Packaging Machinery 0,7 0,6 0,8 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,5
Hungary Total 5,2 4,0 5,7 6,9 7,8 8,7 9,8 10,9
Italy Bottling Line Machinery 12,2 10,3 11,6 12,7 13,3 13,7 14,0 14,3
Italy Cartoning Machinery 149,0 125,7 141,3 155,1 161,9 166,6 170,6 174,2
Italy Closing Machinery 80,7 68,1 76,5 84,0 87,7 90,2 92,4 94,4
Italy Filling & Dosing Machinery 135,2 114,1 128,2 140,8 147,0 151,3 154,9 158,2
Italy Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 103,6 87,4 98,3 107,9 112,7 115,9 118,7 121,2
Italy Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 45,2 38,1 42,9 47,1 49,1 50,6 51,8 52,9
Italy Palletising Machinery 23,7 20,0 22,5 24,7 25,7 26,5 27,1 27,7
Italy Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 88,3 74,5 83,7 91,9 96,0 98,7 101,1 103,2
Italy Other Packaging Machinery 63,9 53,9 60,6 66,5 69,4 71,5 73,2 74,7
Italy Total 701,7 592,0 665,5 730,7 762,9 785,0 803,9 820,8
Netherlands Bottling Line Machinery 1,0 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,1 1,1 1,1
Netherlands Cartoning Machinery 9,1 7,9 8,8 9,3 9,6 9,9 10,2 10,5
Netherlands Closing Machinery 11,6 10,0 11,2 11,9 12,3 12,6 13,0 13,4
Netherlands Filling & Dosing Machinery 10,7 9,3 10,4 10,9 11,3 11,7 12,0 12,3
Netherlands Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 6,0 5,2 5,8 6,1 6,3 6,6 6,7 6,9
Netherlands Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 3,8 3,3 3,7 3,9 4,0 4,1 4,2 4,3
Netherlands Palletising Machinery 1,9 1,7 1,9 2,0 2,1 2,1 2,2 2,2
Netherlands Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 5,6 4,9 5,5 5,8 6,0 6,2 6,3 6,5
Netherlands Other Packaging Machinery 8,3 7,2 8,1 8,5 8,8 9,1 9,3 9,6
Netherlands Total 58,0 50,3 56,3 59,4 61,4 63,3 65,2 67,0
Page 93
Attachment 3 (3)
Total automation share in revenues
Revenues in M€
Total automation share in revenues
Country sector 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Norway Bottling Line Machinery 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3
Norway Cartoning Machinery 1,1 1,2 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,4 1,5 1,5
Norway Closing Machinery 2,5 2,6 2,7 2,9 3,1 3,2 3,3 3,4
Norway Filling & Dosing Machinery 2,8 2,9 3,0 3,2 3,4 3,5 3,6 3,7
Norway Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 1,9 2,0 2,1 2,2 2,3 2,4 2,4 2,5
Norway Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 1,3 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,5 1,6 1,6 1,7
Norway Palletising Machinery 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2
Norway Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 2,0 2,0 2,1 2,3 2,4 2,5 2,5 2,6
Norway Other Packaging Machinery 2,6 2,7 2,8 3,0 3,1 3,2 3,3 3,4
Norway Total 14,5 15,1 15,8 16,8 17,7 18,3 18,8 19,3
Poland Bottling Line Machinery 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Poland Cartoning Machinery 1,0 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,9 0,9
Poland Closing Machinery 0,5 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,4 0,4 0,4
Poland Filling & Dosing Machinery 1,7 0,8 0,9 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5
Poland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 0,9 0,5 0,5 0,6 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8
Poland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 0,6 0,3 0,3 0,4 0,4 0,5 0,5 0,5
Poland Palletising Machinery 0,1 0,0 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Poland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 0,8 0,4 0,4 0,5 0,5 0,6 0,6 0,7
Poland Other Packaging Machinery 0,9 0,4 0,5 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8
Poland Total 6,5 3,3 3,7 4,2 4,6 5,0 5,4 5,8
Portugal Bottling Line Machinery 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Portugal Cartoning Machinery 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2
Portugal Closing Machinery 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3
Portugal Filling & Dosing Machinery 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2
Portugal Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 0,2 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3
Portugal Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Portugal Palletising Machinery 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Portugal Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Portugal Other Packaging Machinery 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2
Portugal Total 1,1 1,3 1,3 1,3 1,3 1,4 1,4 1,4
Spain Bottling Line Machinery 2,1 1,6 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,8 1,8 1,9
Spain Cartoning Machinery 19,4 15,0 14,4 15,3 15,9 16,7 17,2 17,9
Spain Closing Machinery 33,6 26,0 24,9 26,5 27,5 28,8 29,8 31,0
Spain Filling & Dosing Machinery 23,6 18,2 17,4 18,6 19,3 20,2 20,9 21,7
Spain Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 28,8 22,3 21,3 22,7 23,6 24,7 25,6 26,6
Spain Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 8,6 6,7 6,4 6,8 7,1 7,4 7,7 7,9
Spain Palletising Machinery 2,5 2,0 1,9 2,0 2,1 2,2 2,3 2,3
Spain Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 11,2 8,6 8,3 8,8 9,1 9,6 9,9 10,3
Spain Other Packaging Machinery 16,4 12,7 12,1 12,9 13,4 14,1 14,6 15,1
Spain Total 146,1 113,0 108,1 115,1 119,8 125,4 129,8 134,9
Sweden Bottling Line Machinery 1,4 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,1 1,2 1,2 1,2
Sweden Cartoning Machinery 7,0 4,6 5,0 5,5 5,8 6,0 6,2 6,4
Sweden Closing Machinery 15,7 10,1 11,1 12,2 12,9 13,4 13,8 14,2
Sweden Filling & Dosing Machinery 17,3 11,2 12,3 13,5 14,2 14,7 15,3 15,7
Sweden Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 11,7 7,6 8,3 9,1 9,6 10,0 10,3 10,6
Sweden Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 7,8 5,1 5,5 6,1 6,4 6,7 6,9 7,1
Sweden Palletising Machinery 1,1 0,7 0,8 0,9 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0
Sweden Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 12,1 7,9 8,6 9,4 10,0 10,3 10,7 11,0
Sweden Other Packaging Machinery 15,8 10,2 11,2 12,3 13,0 13,5 13,9 14,3
Sweden Total 89,9 58,2 63,7 70,0 73,9 76,6 79,3 81,5
Switzerland Bottling Line Machinery 1,4 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,4 1,5 1,5 1,6
Switzerland Cartoning Machinery 17,9 15,4 16,6 17,7 18,5 19,3 19,9 20,4
Switzerland Closing Machinery 7,7 6,6 7,1 7,6 7,9 8,3 8,5 8,8
Switzerland Filling & Dosing Machinery 21,5 18,5 20,0 21,3 22,2 23,2 23,8 24,5
Switzerland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 15,6 13,4 14,5 15,5 16,1 16,9 17,3 17,8
Switzerland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 6,9 5,9 6,4 6,8 7,1 7,5 7,7 7,9
Switzerland Palletising Machinery 2,5 2,1 2,3 2,4 2,6 2,7 2,7 2,8
Switzerland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 9,4 8,1 8,7 9,3 9,7 10,1 10,4 10,7
Switzerland Other Packaging Machinery 11,3 9,7 10,5 11,2 11,6 12,2 12,5 12,9
Switzerland Total 94,3 80,9 87,5 93,3 97,1 101,7 104,4 107,3
Page 94
Attachment 3 (4)
Total automation share in revenues
Revenues in M€
Total automation share in revenues
Country sector 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Turkey Bottling Line Machinery 2,7 2,4 2,8 3,2 3,4 3,8 4,1 4,5
Turkey Cartoning Machinery 3,2 2,9 3,4 3,8 4,2 4,6 5,0 5,4
Turkey Closing Machinery 3,1 2,8 3,2 3,6 4,0 4,3 4,7 5,2
Turkey Filling & Dosing Machinery 14,0 12,5 14,7 16,5 18,0 19,6 21,5 23,4
Turkey Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 19,4 17,4 20,3 22,9 24,9 27,2 29,8 32,4
Turkey Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 7,5 6,8 7,9 8,9 9,7 10,6 11,6 12,6
Turkey Palletising Machinery 2,2 2,0 2,3 2,6 2,8 3,1 3,4 3,7
Turkey Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 3,4 3,1 3,6 4,1 4,4 4,8 5,3 5,8
Turkey Other Packaging Machinery 6,9 6,2 7,3 8,2 8,9 9,7 10,7 11,6
Turkey Total 62,5 56,0 65,6 73,8 80,3 87,7 96,1 104,6
UK & Ireland Bottling Line Machinery 3,8 2,3 2,6 2,8 2,9 3,0 3,0 3,1
UK & Ireland Cartoning Machinery 23,6 14,6 16,3 17,5 18,2 18,5 18,8 19,1
UK & Ireland Closing Machinery 21,9 13,5 15,2 16,2 16,9 17,2 17,5 17,7
UK & Ireland Filling & Dosing Machinery 29,8 18,4 20,6 22,0 23,0 23,4 23,7 24,1
UK & Ireland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 32,2 19,9 22,2 23,8 24,8 25,3 25,7 26,1
UK & Ireland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 16,1 9,9 11,1 11,9 12,4 12,7 12,9 13,0
UK & Ireland Palletising Machinery 5,7 3,5 4,0 4,2 4,4 4,5 4,6 4,6
UK & Ireland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 19,4 12,0 13,4 14,4 15,0 15,3 15,5 15,7
UK & Ireland Other Packaging Machinery 23,0 14,2 15,9 17,0 17,7 18,1 18,3 18,6
UK & Ireland Total 175,7 108,3 121,3 129,9 135,3 138,0 139,9 142,1
Rest of Europe & CIS Bottling Line Machinery 3,6 3,1 3,4 3,7 4,0 4,2 4,4 4,6
Rest of Europe & CIS Cartoning Machinery 4,3 3,8 4,1 4,5 4,8 5,1 5,3 5,6
Rest of Europe & CIS Closing Machinery 16,0 14,0 15,3 16,7 17,9 18,9 19,8 20,7
Rest of Europe & CIS Filling & Dosing Machinery 39,5 34,6 37,7 41,2 44,1 46,6 48,8 51,0
Rest of Europe & CIS Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 20,6 18,0 19,7 21,5 23,0 24,3 25,5 26,6
Rest of Europe & CIS Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 19,6 17,1 18,7 20,4 21,8 23,1 24,2 25,3
Rest of Europe & CIS Palletising Machinery 2,9 2,5 2,8 3,0 3,2 3,4 3,6 3,8
Rest of Europe & CIS Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 19,3 16,9 18,4 20,1 21,5 22,8 23,9 24,9
Rest of Europe & CIS Other Packaging Machinery 25,2 22,1 24,1 26,4 28,2 29,8 31,2 32,6
Rest of Europe & CIS Total 151,0 132,2 144,2 157,7 168,6 178,3 186,7 195,0
Page 95
Attachment 4 (1)
Motion Control component revenues
Revenues in k€
Motion Control component revenues Genuine revenues Predicted revenues 11/2011
Country sector 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Austria Bottling Line Machinery 51,5 39,6 42,3 46,3 49,4 52,1 54,7 57,1
Austria Cartoning Machinery 357,8 275,5 294,4 322,0 343,5 362,4 380,4 396,7
Austria Closing Machinery 71,0 54,6 58,4 63,9 68,1 71,9 75,5 78,7
Austria Filling & Dosing Machinery 121,2 93,3 99,8 109,1 116,4 122,8 128,9 134,4
Austria Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 319,6 246,1 263,0 287,7 306,9 323,7 339,9 354,4
Austria Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 77,8 59,9 64,1 70,1 74,7 78,8 82,8 86,3
Austria Palletising Machinery 17,7 13,7 14,6 16,0 17,0 18,0 18,9 19,7
Austria Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 38,5 29,6 31,7 34,6 36,9 39,0 40,9 42,7
Austria Other Packaging Machinery 161,8 124,6 133,2 145,6 155,4 163,9 172,0 179,4
Belgium Bottling Line Machinery 38,2 28,5 28,2 30,3 31,7 32,6 33,6 34,4
Belgium Cartoning Machinery 192,4 143,5 142,3 153,0 159,9 164,3 169,5 173,4
Belgium Closing Machinery 113,0 84,3 83,6 89,9 94,0 96,5 99,6 101,9
Belgium Filling & Dosing Machinery 63,7 47,5 47,1 50,7 53,0 54,4 56,1 57,4
Belgium Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 130,2 97,1 96,3 103,5 108,2 111,2 114,7 117,4
Belgium Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 44,9 33,5 33,2 35,7 37,3 38,4 39,6 40,5
Belgium Palletising Machinery 14,8 11,0 10,9 11,7 12,3 12,6 13,0 13,3
Belgium Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 24,5 18,3 18,1 19,5 20,4 20,9 21,6 22,1
Belgium Other Packaging Machinery 126,2 94,2 93,4 100,4 104,9 107,8 111,2 113,8
Czech Republic Bottling Line Machinery 2,9 2,2 2,5 2,8 3,0 3,3 3,7 4,1
Czech Republic Cartoning Machinery 14,6 11,3 12,9 14,2 15,5 17,2 18,9 21,0
Czech Republic Closing Machinery 19,1 14,8 16,9 18,6 20,4 22,5 24,8 27,6
Czech Republic Filling & Dosing Machinery 12,4 9,6 10,9 12,0 13,2 14,5 16,0 17,8
Czech Republic Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 20,4 15,8 18,0 19,8 21,7 23,9 26,4 29,3
Czech Republic Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 9,6 7,5 8,5 9,4 10,3 11,3 12,5 13,9
Czech Republic Palletising Machinery 0,8 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1
Czech Republic Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 8,5 6,6 7,5 8,3 9,0 10,0 11,0 12,2
Czech Republic Other Packaging Machinery 20,1 15,6 17,7 19,5 21,4 23,6 26,0 28,9
Denmark Bottling Line Machinery 22,7 17,3 17,0 18,4 19,3 20,0 20,7 21,1
Denmark Cartoning Machinery 63,2 48,2 47,3 51,2 53,8 55,8 57,6 58,9
Denmark Closing Machinery 64,8 49,4 48,6 52,6 55,2 57,3 59,1 60,4
Denmark Filling & Dosing Machinery 43,7 33,4 32,8 35,5 37,2 38,6 39,9 40,8
Denmark Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 107,7 82,1 80,7 87,3 91,6 95,1 98,2 100,3
Denmark Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 39,5 30,1 29,6 32,0 33,6 34,9 36,0 36,8
Denmark Palletising Machinery 3,6 2,7 2,7 2,9 3,1 3,2 3,3 3,3
Denmark Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 22,3 17,0 16,7 18,1 19,0 19,7 20,3 20,8
Denmark Other Packaging Machinery 101,6 77,5 76,2 82,4 86,5 89,8 92,7 94,7
Finland Bottling Line Machinery 14,8 11,9 13,1 14,2 15,0 15,5 15,9 16,4
Finland Cartoning Machinery 41,1 33,2 36,5 39,7 41,8 43,2 44,3 45,7
Finland Closing Machinery 42,2 34,1 37,4 40,7 43,0 44,4 45,5 46,9
Finland Filling & Dosing Machinery 28,5 23,0 25,3 27,5 29,0 29,9 30,7 31,7
Finland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 70,1 56,6 62,2 67,6 71,3 73,7 75,5 77,9
Finland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 25,7 20,8 22,8 24,8 26,2 27,0 27,7 28,6
Finland Palletising Machinery 2,3 1,9 2,1 2,3 2,4 2,5 2,5 2,6
Finland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 14,5 11,7 12,9 14,0 14,8 15,3 15,6 16,2
Finland Other Packaging Machinery 66,2 53,5 58,7 63,8 67,3 69,6 71,3 73,6
France Bottling Line Machinery 352,4 331,0 351,7 380,1 396,4 410,2 419,1 428,2
France Cartoning Machinery 768,1 721,4 766,7 828,7 864,1 894,1 913,6 933,5
France Closing Machinery 355,9 334,3 355,3 384,0 400,4 414,4 423,4 432,6
France Filling & Dosing Machinery 290,4 272,7 289,9 313,3 326,7 338,0 345,4 352,9
France Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 594,3 558,2 593,2 641,2 668,6 691,8 706,9 722,3
France Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 119,1 111,8 118,9 128,5 134,0 138,6 141,6 144,7
France Palletising Machinery 62,5 58,7 62,4 67,4 70,3 72,7 74,3 75,9
France Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 70,2 65,9 70,0 75,7 78,9 81,7 83,5 85,3
France Other Packaging Machinery 323,4 303,7 322,8 348,9 363,8 376,5 384,7 393,0
Germany Bottling Line Machinery 8 130,5 6 624,8 7 618,9 8 407,8 8 875,0 9 234,9 9 544,9 9 865,2
Germany Cartoning Machinery 6 207,1 5 057,6 5 816,5 6 418,9 6 775,5 7 050,3 7 286,9 7 531,5
Germany Closing Machinery 2 826,2 2 302,8 2 648,3 2 922,6 3 084,9 3 210,1 3 317,8 3 429,2
Germany Filling & Dosing Machinery 1 771,3 1 443,3 1 659,9 1 831,8 1 933,5 2 012,0 2 079,5 2 149,3
Germany Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 5 553,5 4 525,0 5 204,0 5 742,9 6 062,0 6 307,8 6 519,5 6 738,4
Germany Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 1 593,8 1 298,7 1 493,5 1 648,2 1 739,8 1 810,3 1 871,1 1 933,9
Germany Palletising Machinery 969,7 790,2 908,7 1 002,8 1 058,5 1 101,5 1 138,4 1 176,6
Germany Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 594,4 484,3 557,0 614,6 648,8 675,1 697,8 721,2
Germany Other Packaging Machinery 1 787,3 1 456,3 1 674,8 1 848,2 1 950,9 2 030,0 2 098,2 2 168,6
Greece Bottling Line Machinery 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Greece Cartoning Machinery 0,5 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3
Greece Closing Machinery 0,5 0,4 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3
Greece Filling & Dosing Machinery 0,4 0,3 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2
Greece Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 0,6 0,5 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4
Greece Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 0,3 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2
Greece Palletising Machinery 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 0,3 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2
Greece Other Packaging Machinery 0,6 0,5 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4
Page 96
Attachment 4 (2)
Motion Control component revenues
Revenues in k€
Motion Control component revenues Genuine revenues Predicted revenues 11/2011
Country sector k€/a 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Hungary Bottling Line Machinery 2,8 2,2 3,1 3,8 4,3 4,7 5,3 5,9
Hungary Cartoning Machinery 14,5 11,2 15,9 19,4 21,8 24,3 27,3 30,4
Hungary Closing Machinery 16,3 12,6 17,9 21,8 24,6 27,4 30,7 34,2
Hungary Filling & Dosing Machinery 12,3 9,5 13,5 16,4 18,5 20,6 23,1 25,7
Hungary Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 20,2 15,6 22,2 27,0 30,4 33,9 38,0 42,4
Hungary Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 9,6 7,4 10,5 12,8 14,4 16,1 18,0 20,1
Hungary Palletising Machinery 0,7 0,6 0,8 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,4 1,6
Hungary Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 8,4 6,5 9,2 11,2 12,7 14,1 15,8 17,7
Hungary Other Packaging Machinery 19,9 15,4 21,9 26,6 30,0 33,4 37,5 41,8
Italy Bottling Line Machinery 878,6 741,3 833,2 914,9 955,2 982,9 1 006,5 1 027,7
Italy Cartoning Machinery 5 809,3 4 901,5 5 509,4 6 049,3 6 315,6 6 498,9 6 655,1 6 795,1
Italy Closing Machinery 1 452,0 1 225,1 1 377,0 1 512,0 1 578,6 1 624,4 1 663,4 1 698,4
Italy Filling & Dosing Machinery 1 487,5 1 255,0 1 410,7 1 548,9 1 617,1 1 664,1 1 704,0 1 739,9
Italy Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 4 145,4 3 497,6 3 931,4 4 316,7 4 506,7 4 637,5 4 748,9 4 848,8
Italy Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 994,1 838,8 942,8 1 035,2 1 080,8 1 112,2 1 138,9 1 162,8
Italy Palletising Machinery 331,5 279,7 314,4 345,2 360,4 370,8 379,8 387,7
Italy Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 706,1 595,8 669,7 735,3 767,7 790,0 809,0 826,0
Italy Other Packaging Machinery 1 788,4 1 509,0 1 696,1 1 862,3 1 944,3 2 000,7 2 048,8 2 091,9
Netherlands Bottling Line Machinery 70,3 61,0 68,2 72,1 74,4 76,8 79,1 81,3
Netherlands Cartoning Machinery 354,6 307,5 344,1 363,4 375,3 387,4 398,8 409,7
Netherlands Closing Machinery 208,4 180,7 202,2 213,5 220,5 227,6 234,3 240,7
Netherlands Filling & Dosing Machinery 117,4 101,8 113,9 120,3 124,3 128,3 132,1 135,7
Netherlands Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 240,0 208,1 232,8 245,9 254,0 262,2 269,9 277,3
Netherlands Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 82,8 71,8 80,3 84,8 87,6 90,4 93,1 95,6
Netherlands Palletising Machinery 27,2 23,6 26,4 27,9 28,8 29,7 30,6 31,4
Netherlands Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 45,2 39,2 43,8 46,3 47,8 49,3 50,8 52,2
Netherlands Other Packaging Machinery 232,7 201,7 225,7 238,4 246,2 254,2 261,6 268,8
Norway Bottling Line Machinery 15,9 16,6 17,3 18,5 19,4 20,1 20,6 21,1
Norway Cartoning Machinery 44,4 46,3 48,2 51,4 54,1 55,9 57,4 58,9
Norway Closing Machinery 45,6 47,5 49,5 52,8 55,5 57,4 59,0 60,5
Norway Filling & Dosing Machinery 30,8 32,0 33,4 35,6 37,4 38,7 39,8 40,8
Norway Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 75,7 78,8 82,1 87,7 92,2 95,3 97,9 100,4
Norway Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 27,8 28,9 30,1 32,2 33,8 34,9 35,9 36,8
Norway Palletising Machinery 2,5 2,6 2,7 2,9 3,1 3,2 3,3 3,3
Norway Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 15,7 16,3 17,0 18,2 19,1 19,7 20,3 20,8
Norway Other Packaging Machinery 71,5 74,4 77,5 82,8 87,0 89,9 92,4 94,8
Poland Bottling Line Machinery 7,9 4,0 4,5 5,0 5,5 6,0 6,5 7,1
Poland Cartoning Machinery 40,1 20,2 22,7 25,5 28,0 30,5 33,2 35,9
Poland Closing Machinery 9,0 4,5 5,1 5,7 6,3 6,8 7,4 8,0
Poland Filling & Dosing Machinery 18,3 9,2 10,4 11,7 12,8 13,9 15,2 16,4
Poland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 36,1 18,2 20,5 23,0 25,3 27,4 29,9 32,3
Poland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 13,3 6,7 7,5 8,5 9,3 10,1 11,0 11,9
Poland Palletising Machinery 1,3 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,1
Poland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 6,1 3,1 3,5 3,9 4,3 4,7 5,1 5,5
Poland Other Packaging Machinery 24,0 12,1 13,6 15,3 16,8 18,3 19,9 21,5
Portugal Bottling Line Machinery 1,1 1,3 1,3 1,4 1,4 1,4 1,4 1,5
Portugal Cartoning Machinery 5,9 6,8 6,8 6,9 6,9 7,1 7,3 7,5
Portugal Closing Machinery 4,7 5,5 5,5 5,5 5,5 5,7 5,8 6,0
Portugal Filling & Dosing Machinery 2,0 2,3 2,3 2,4 2,4 2,4 2,5 2,6
Portugal Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 8,9 10,4 10,4 10,5 10,5 10,8 11,1 11,4
Portugal Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 1,5 1,7 1,7 1,7 1,7 1,8 1,8 1,9
Portugal Palletising Machinery 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,4
Portugal Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,9 0,9
Portugal Other Packaging Machinery 3,6 4,1 4,1 4,2 4,2 4,3 4,4 4,6
Spain Bottling Line Machinery 148,3 114,7 109,8 116,8 121,6 127,3 131,8 136,9
Spain Cartoning Machinery 756,7 585,3 560,2 596,1 620,5 649,7 672,5 698,7
Spain Closing Machinery 604,3 467,4 447,4 476,1 495,5 518,9 537,1 558,0
Spain Filling & Dosing Machinery 259,1 200,4 191,8 204,1 212,5 222,5 230,3 239,2
Spain Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 1 151,1 890,3 852,2 906,9 943,9 988,4 1 023,1 1 062,9
Spain Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 189,4 146,5 140,2 149,2 155,3 162,6 168,3 174,9
Spain Palletising Machinery 35,5 27,5 26,3 28,0 29,1 30,5 31,6 32,8
Spain Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 89,3 69,0 66,1 70,3 73,2 76,6 79,3 82,4
Spain Other Packaging Machinery 459,2 355,2 339,9 361,7 376,5 394,3 408,1 424,0
Sweden Bottling Line Machinery 98,6 63,8 69,9 76,7 81,0 84,0 86,9 89,4
Sweden Cartoning Machinery 274,7 177,8 194,7 213,9 225,7 234,1 242,3 249,1
Sweden Closing Machinery 282,0 182,5 199,9 219,5 231,7 240,3 248,8 255,7
Sweden Filling & Dosing Machinery 190,2 123,1 134,8 148,1 156,3 162,1 167,8 172,5
Sweden Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 468,2 303,0 331,8 364,5 384,6 399,0 413,0 424,4
Sweden Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 171,7 111,1 121,7 133,7 141,1 146,3 151,5 155,7
Sweden Palletising Machinery 15,6 10,1 11,0 12,1 12,8 13,3 13,8 14,1
Sweden Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 97,1 62,8 68,8 75,6 79,7 82,7 85,6 88,0
Sweden Other Packaging Machinery 442,0 286,1 313,3 344,1 363,2 376,7 389,9 400,7
Page 97
Attachment 4 (3)
Motion Control component revenues
Revenues in k€
Motion Control component revenues Genuine revenues Predicted revenues 11/2011
Country sector k€/a 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Switzerland Bottling Line Machinery 100,6 86,3 93,3 99,5 103,6 108,5 111,3 114,5
Switzerland Cartoning Machinery 699,4 599,9 648,8 691,8 720,3 754,4 774,2 796,2
Switzerland Closing Machinery 138,7 119,0 128,7 137,2 142,9 149,6 153,6 157,9
Switzerland Filling & Dosing Machinery 237,0 203,3 219,8 234,4 244,1 255,6 262,3 269,8
Switzerland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 624,8 536,0 579,6 618,1 643,6 674,0 691,7 711,4
Switzerland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 152,2 130,5 141,1 150,5 156,7 164,1 168,4 173,2
Switzerland Palletising Machinery 34,7 29,7 32,2 34,3 35,7 37,4 38,4 39,5
Switzerland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 75,2 64,5 69,8 74,4 77,4 81,1 83,2 85,6
Switzerland Other Packaging Machinery 316,3 271,3 293,4 312,9 325,8 341,2 350,1 360,1
Turkey Bottling Line Machinery 192,6 172,5 202,0 227,3 247,5 270,2 296,1 322,2
Turkey Cartoning Machinery 126,6 113,4 132,7 149,4 162,6 177,6 194,6 211,8
Turkey Closing Machinery 55,5 49,7 58,2 65,5 71,3 77,8 85,3 92,8
Turkey Filling & Dosing Machinery 153,9 137,9 161,4 181,6 197,7 215,9 236,6 257,5
Turkey Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 775,8 694,9 813,5 915,3 996,7 1 088,2 1 192,6 1 297,8
Turkey Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 166,1 148,8 174,1 195,9 213,4 232,9 255,3 277,8
Turkey Palletising Machinery 30,7 27,5 32,2 36,2 39,4 43,0 47,2 51,3
Turkey Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 27,5 24,7 28,9 32,5 35,4 38,6 42,3 46,0
Turkey Other Packaging Machinery 194,4 174,1 203,8 229,3 249,7 272,6 298,8 325,2
UK & Ireland Bottling Line Machinery 271,9 167,5 187,7 200,9 209,4 213,5 216,5 219,8
UK & Ireland Cartoning Machinery 921,3 567,7 636,0 680,9 709,6 723,4 733,8 745,0
UK & Ireland Closing Machinery 395,1 243,5 272,7 292,0 304,3 310,2 314,7 319,5
UK & Ireland Filling & Dosing Machinery 327,9 202,0 226,4 242,3 252,6 257,5 261,1 265,2
UK & Ireland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 1 289,0 794,4 889,9 952,7 992,9 1 012,2 1 026,7 1 042,4
UK & Ireland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 354,9 218,7 245,0 262,3 273,4 278,7 282,7 287,0
UK & Ireland Palletising Machinery 80,4 49,6 55,5 59,4 61,9 63,1 64,1 65,0
UK & Ireland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 155,4 95,8 107,3 114,9 119,7 122,0 123,8 125,7
UK & Ireland Other Packaging Machinery 644,6 397,2 445,0 476,4 496,5 506,1 513,4 521,3
Rest of Europe & CIS Bottling Line Machinery 256,0 224,2 244,5 267,3 285,9 302,3 316,6 330,7
Rest of Europe & CIS Cartoning Machinery 167,9 147,1 160,4 175,4 187,5 198,3 207,7 216,9
Rest of Europe & CIS Closing Machinery 288,6 252,9 275,7 301,4 322,4 340,9 357,0 372,9
Rest of Europe & CIS Filling & Dosing Machinery 434,2 380,4 414,8 453,5 485,0 512,8 537,1 560,9
Rest of Europe & CIS Form, Fill & Seal Machinery 824,0 721,8 787,1 860,5 920,2 973,1 1 019,2 1 064,4
Rest of Europe & CIS Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery 430,4 377,0 411,1 449,5 480,7 508,3 532,4 556,0
Rest of Europe & CIS Palletising Machinery 40,7 35,7 38,9 42,5 45,5 48,1 50,4 52,6
Rest of Europe & CIS Wrapping & Bundling Machinery 154,3 135,2 147,4 161,2 172,3 182,2 190,9 199,3
Rest of Europe & CIS Other Packaging Machinery 706,6 619,0 674,9 737,9 789,1 834,4 873,9 912,7
Page 98
Attachment 5 (1)
Revenues for sub-components
Revenues in k€
Motion Control component revenues divided into five sub-components
Sub-component share can be modified by entering a percentage after the product
Servo Motors 30 %
Servo Drives 30 %
Stepper Motors 5 %
Stepper Drives 5 %
Position Control 30 %
100 %
Genuine Revenues Predicted revenues 11/2011
Country sector 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Austria Bottling Line Machinery Servo Motors 15,4 11,9 12,7 13,9 14,8 15,6 16,4 17,1
Austria Bottling Line Machinery Servo Drives 15,4 11,9 12,7 13,9 14,8 15,6 16,4 17,1
Austria Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Motors 2,6 2,0 2,1 2,3 2,5 2,6 2,7 2,9
Austria Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Drives 2,6 2,0 2,1 2,3 2,5 2,6 2,7 2,9
Austria Bottling Line Machinery Position Control 15,4 11,9 12,7 13,9 14,8 15,6 16,4 17,1
Austria Cartoning Machinery Servo Motors 107,3 82,6 88,3 96,6 103,1 108,7 114,1 119,0
Austria Cartoning Machinery Servo Drives 107,3 82,6 88,3 96,6 103,1 108,7 114,1 119,0
Austria Cartoning Machinery Stepper Motors 17,9 13,8 14,7 16,1 17,2 18,1 19,0 19,8
Austria Cartoning Machinery Stepper Drives 17,9 13,8 14,7 16,1 17,2 18,1 19,0 19,8
Austria Cartoning Machinery Position Control 107,3 82,6 88,3 96,6 103,1 108,7 114,1 119,0
Austria Closing Machinery Servo Motors 21,3 16,4 17,5 19,2 20,4 21,6 22,6 23,6
Austria Closing Machinery Servo Drives 21,3 16,4 17,5 19,2 20,4 21,6 22,6 23,6
Austria Closing Machinery Stepper Motors 3,5 2,7 2,9 3,2 3,4 3,6 3,8 3,9
Austria Closing Machinery Stepper Drives 3,5 2,7 2,9 3,2 3,4 3,6 3,8 3,9
Austria Closing Machinery Position Control 21,3 16,4 17,5 19,2 20,4 21,6 22,6 23,6
Austria Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Motors 36,4 28,0 29,9 32,7 34,9 36,8 38,7 40,3
Austria Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Drives 36,4 28,0 29,9 32,7 34,9 36,8 38,7 40,3
Austria Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Motors 6,1 4,7 5,0 5,5 5,8 6,1 6,4 6,7
Austria Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Drives 6,1 4,7 5,0 5,5 5,8 6,1 6,4 6,7
Austria Filling & Dosing Machinery Position Control 36,4 28,0 29,9 32,7 34,9 36,8 38,7 40,3
Austria Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Motors 95,9 73,8 78,9 86,3 92,1 97,1 102,0 106,3
Austria Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Drives 95,9 73,8 78,9 86,3 92,1 97,1 102,0 106,3
Austria Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Motors 16,0 12,3 13,2 14,4 15,3 16,2 17,0 17,7
Austria Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Drives 16,0 12,3 13,2 14,4 15,3 16,2 17,0 17,7
Austria Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Position Control 95,9 73,8 78,9 86,3 92,1 97,1 102,0 106,3
Austria Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Motors 23,4 18,0 19,2 21,0 22,4 23,7 24,8 25,9
Austria Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Drives 23,4 18,0 19,2 21,0 22,4 23,7 24,8 25,9
Austria Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Motors 3,9 3,0 3,2 3,5 3,7 3,9 4,1 4,3
Austria Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Drives 3,9 3,0 3,2 3,5 3,7 3,9 4,1 4,3
Austria Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Position Control 23,4 18,0 19,2 21,0 22,4 23,7 24,8 25,9
Austria Palletising Machinery Servo Motors 5,3 4,1 4,4 4,8 5,1 5,4 5,7 5,9
Austria Palletising Machinery Servo Drives 5,3 4,1 4,4 4,8 5,1 5,4 5,7 5,9
Austria Palletising Machinery Stepper Motors 0,9 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,9 0,9 0,9 1,0
Austria Palletising Machinery Stepper Drives 0,9 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,9 0,9 0,9 1,0
Austria Palletising Machinery Position Control 5,3 4,1 4,4 4,8 5,1 5,4 5,7 5,9
Austria Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Motors 11,5 8,9 9,5 10,4 11,1 11,7 12,3 12,8
Austria Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Drives 11,5 8,9 9,5 10,4 11,1 11,7 12,3 12,8
Austria Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Motors 1,9 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,8 1,9 2,0 2,1
Austria Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Drives 1,9 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,8 1,9 2,0 2,1
Austria Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Position Control 11,5 8,9 9,5 10,4 11,1 11,7 12,3 12,8
Austria Other Packaging Machinery Servo Motors 48,5 37,4 39,9 43,7 46,6 49,2 51,6 53,8
Austria Other Packaging Machinery Servo Drives 48,5 37,4 39,9 43,7 46,6 49,2 51,6 53,8
Austria Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Motors 8,1 6,2 6,7 7,3 7,8 8,2 8,6 9,0
Austria Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Drives 8,1 6,2 6,7 7,3 7,8 8,2 8,6 9,0
Austria Other Packaging Machinery Position Control 48,5 37,4 39,9 43,7 46,6 49,2 51,6 53,8
Belgium Bottling Line Machinery Servo Motors 11,4 8,5 8,5 9,1 9,5 9,8 10,1 10,3
Belgium Bottling Line Machinery Servo Drives 11,4 8,5 8,5 9,1 9,5 9,8 10,1 10,3
Belgium Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Motors 1,9 1,4 1,4 1,5 1,6 1,6 1,7 1,7
Belgium Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Drives 1,9 1,4 1,4 1,5 1,6 1,6 1,7 1,7
Belgium Bottling Line Machinery Position Control 11,4 8,5 8,5 9,1 9,5 9,8 10,1 10,3
Belgium Cartoning Machinery Servo Motors 57,7 43,1 42,7 45,9 48,0 49,3 50,8 52,0
Belgium Cartoning Machinery Servo Drives 57,7 43,1 42,7 45,9 48,0 49,3 50,8 52,0
Belgium Cartoning Machinery Stepper Motors 9,6 7,2 7,1 7,7 8,0 8,2 8,5 8,7
Belgium Cartoning Machinery Stepper Drives 9,6 7,2 7,1 7,7 8,0 8,2 8,5 8,7
Belgium Cartoning Machinery Position Control 57,7 43,1 42,7 45,9 48,0 49,3 50,8 52,0
Belgium Closing Machinery Servo Motors 33,9 25,3 25,1 27,0 28,2 29,0 29,9 30,6
Belgium Closing Machinery Servo Drives 33,9 25,3 25,1 27,0 28,2 29,0 29,9 30,6
Belgium Closing Machinery Stepper Motors 5,7 4,2 4,2 4,5 4,7 4,8 5,0 5,1
Belgium Closing Machinery Stepper Drives 5,7 4,2 4,2 4,5 4,7 4,8 5,0 5,1
Belgium Closing Machinery Position Control 33,9 25,3 25,1 27,0 28,2 29,0 29,9 30,6
Belgium Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Motors 19,1 14,3 14,1 15,2 15,9 16,3 16,8 17,2
Belgium Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Drives 19,1 14,3 14,1 15,2 15,9 16,3 16,8 17,2
Page 99
Attachment 5 (2)
Revenues for sub-components
Revenues in k€
Genuine Revenues Predicted revenues 11/2011
Country sector 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Belgium Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Motors 3,2 2,4 2,4 2,5 2,6 2,7 2,8 2,9
Belgium Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Drives 3,2 2,4 2,4 2,5 2,6 2,7 2,8 2,9
Belgium Filling & Dosing Machinery Position Control 19,1 14,3 14,1 15,2 15,9 16,3 16,8 17,2
Belgium Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Motors 39,1 29,1 28,9 31,1 32,5 33,4 34,4 35,2
Belgium Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Drives 39,1 29,1 28,9 31,1 32,5 33,4 34,4 35,2
Belgium Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Motors 6,5 4,9 4,8 5,2 5,4 5,6 5,7 5,9
Belgium Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Drives 6,5 4,9 4,8 5,2 5,4 5,6 5,7 5,9
Belgium Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Position Control 39,1 29,1 28,9 31,1 32,5 33,4 34,4 35,2
Belgium Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Motors 13,5 10,1 10,0 10,7 11,2 11,5 11,9 12,1
Belgium Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Drives 13,5 10,1 10,0 10,7 11,2 11,5 11,9 12,1
Belgium Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Motors 2,2 1,7 1,7 1,8 1,9 1,9 2,0 2,0
Belgium Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Drives 2,2 1,7 1,7 1,8 1,9 1,9 2,0 2,0
Belgium Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Position Control 13,5 10,1 10,0 10,7 11,2 11,5 11,9 12,1
Belgium Palletising Machinery Servo Motors 4,4 3,3 3,3 3,5 3,7 3,8 3,9 4,0
Belgium Palletising Machinery Servo Drives 4,4 3,3 3,3 3,5 3,7 3,8 3,9 4,0
Belgium Palletising Machinery Stepper Motors 0,7 0,6 0,5 0,6 0,6 0,6 0,6 0,7
Belgium Palletising Machinery Stepper Drives 0,7 0,6 0,5 0,6 0,6 0,6 0,6 0,7
Belgium Palletising Machinery Position Control 4,4 3,3 3,3 3,5 3,7 3,8 3,9 4,0
Belgium Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Motors 7,4 5,5 5,4 5,8 6,1 6,3 6,5 6,6
Belgium Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Drives 7,4 5,5 5,4 5,8 6,1 6,3 6,5 6,6
Belgium Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Motors 1,2 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,1 1,1
Belgium Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Drives 1,2 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,1 1,1
Belgium Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Position Control 7,4 5,5 5,4 5,8 6,1 6,3 6,5 6,6
Belgium Other Packaging Machinery Servo Motors 37,9 28,3 28,0 30,1 31,5 32,3 33,4 34,1
Belgium Other Packaging Machinery Servo Drives 37,9 28,3 28,0 30,1 31,5 32,3 33,4 34,1
Belgium Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Motors 6,3 4,7 4,7 5,0 5,2 5,4 5,6 5,7
Belgium Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Drives 6,3 4,7 4,7 5,0 5,2 5,4 5,6 5,7
Belgium Other Packaging Machinery Position Control 37,9 28,3 28,0 30,1 31,5 32,3 33,4 34,1
Czech Republic Bottling Line Machinery Servo Motors 0,9 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,2
Czech Republic Bottling Line Machinery Servo Drives 0,9 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,2
Czech Republic Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Motors 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2
Czech Republic Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Drives 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2
Czech Republic Bottling Line Machinery Position Control 0,9 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,2
Czech Republic Cartoning Machinery Servo Motors 4,4 3,4 3,9 4,3 4,7 5,1 5,7 6,3
Czech Republic Cartoning Machinery Servo Drives 4,4 3,4 3,9 4,3 4,7 5,1 5,7 6,3
Czech Republic Cartoning Machinery Stepper Motors 0,7 0,6 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,1
Czech Republic Cartoning Machinery Stepper Drives 0,7 0,6 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,1
Czech Republic Cartoning Machinery Position Control 4,4 3,4 3,9 4,3 4,7 5,1 5,7 6,3
Czech Republic Closing Machinery Servo Motors 5,7 4,5 5,1 5,6 6,1 6,7 7,4 8,3
Czech Republic Closing Machinery Servo Drives 5,7 4,5 5,1 5,6 6,1 6,7 7,4 8,3
Czech Republic Closing Machinery Stepper Motors 1,0 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,4
Czech Republic Closing Machinery Stepper Drives 1,0 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,4
Czech Republic Closing Machinery Position Control 5,7 4,5 5,1 5,6 6,1 6,7 7,4 8,3
Czech Republic Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Motors 3,7 2,9 3,3 3,6 3,9 4,4 4,8 5,3
Czech Republic Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Drives 3,7 2,9 3,3 3,6 3,9 4,4 4,8 5,3
Czech Republic Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Motors 0,6 0,5 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,9
Czech Republic Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Drives 0,6 0,5 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,9
Czech Republic Filling & Dosing Machinery Position Control 3,7 2,9 3,3 3,6 3,9 4,4 4,8 5,3
Czech Republic Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Motors 6,1 4,7 5,4 5,9 6,5 7,2 7,9 8,8
Czech Republic Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Drives 6,1 4,7 5,4 5,9 6,5 7,2 7,9 8,8
Czech Republic Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Motors 1,0 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,5
Czech Republic Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Drives 1,0 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,5
Czech Republic Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Position Control 6,1 4,7 5,4 5,9 6,5 7,2 7,9 8,8
Czech Republic Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Motors 2,9 2,2 2,6 2,8 3,1 3,4 3,7 4,2
Czech Republic Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Drives 2,9 2,2 2,6 2,8 3,1 3,4 3,7 4,2
Czech Republic Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Motors 0,5 0,4 0,4 0,5 0,5 0,6 0,6 0,7
Czech Republic Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Drives 0,5 0,4 0,4 0,5 0,5 0,6 0,6 0,7
Czech Republic Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Position Control 2,9 2,2 2,6 2,8 3,1 3,4 3,7 4,2
Czech Republic Palletising Machinery Servo Motors 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,3 0,3 0,3
Czech Republic Palletising Machinery Servo Drives 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,3 0,3 0,3
Czech Republic Palletising Machinery Stepper Motors 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,1
Czech Republic Palletising Machinery Stepper Drives 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,1
Czech Republic Palletising Machinery Position Control 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,3 0,3 0,3
Czech Republic Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Motors 2,5 2,0 2,2 2,5 2,7 3,0 3,3 3,7
Czech Republic Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Drives 2,5 2,0 2,2 2,5 2,7 3,0 3,3 3,7
Czech Republic Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Motors 0,4 0,3 0,4 0,4 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,6
Czech Republic Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Drives 0,4 0,3 0,4 0,4 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,6
Czech Republic Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Position Control 2,5 2,0 2,2 2,5 2,7 3,0 3,3 3,7
Czech Republic Other Packaging Machinery Servo Motors 6,0 4,7 5,3 5,9 6,4 7,1 7,8 8,7
Czech Republic Other Packaging Machinery Servo Drives 6,0 4,7 5,3 5,9 6,4 7,1 7,8 8,7
Page 100
Attachment 5 (3)
Revenues for sub-components
Revenues in k€
Genuine Revenues Predicted revenues 11/2011
Country sector 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Czech Republic Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Motors 1,0 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4
Czech Republic Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Drives 1,0 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4
Czech Republic Other Packaging Machinery Position Control 6,0 4,7 5,3 5,9 6,4 7,1 7,8 8,7
Denmark Bottling Line Machinery Servo Motors 6,8 5,2 5,1 5,5 5,8 6,0 6,2 6,3
Denmark Bottling Line Machinery Servo Drives 6,8 5,2 5,1 5,5 5,8 6,0 6,2 6,3
Denmark Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Motors 1,1 0,9 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,1
Denmark Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Drives 1,1 0,9 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,1
Denmark Bottling Line Machinery Position Control 6,8 5,2 5,1 5,5 5,8 6,0 6,2 6,3
Denmark Cartoning Machinery Servo Motors 19,0 14,5 14,2 15,4 16,1 16,7 17,3 17,7
Denmark Cartoning Machinery Servo Drives 19,0 14,5 14,2 15,4 16,1 16,7 17,3 17,7
Denmark Cartoning Machinery Stepper Motors 3,2 2,4 2,4 2,6 2,7 2,8 2,9 2,9
Denmark Cartoning Machinery Stepper Drives 3,2 2,4 2,4 2,6 2,7 2,8 2,9 2,9
Denmark Cartoning Machinery Position Control 19,0 14,5 14,2 15,4 16,1 16,7 17,3 17,7
Denmark Closing Machinery Servo Motors 19,5 14,8 14,6 15,8 16,6 17,2 17,7 18,1
Denmark Closing Machinery Servo Drives 19,5 14,8 14,6 15,8 16,6 17,2 17,7 18,1
Denmark Closing Machinery Stepper Motors 3,2 2,5 2,4 2,6 2,8 2,9 3,0 3,0
Denmark Closing Machinery Stepper Drives 3,2 2,5 2,4 2,6 2,8 2,9 3,0 3,0
Denmark Closing Machinery Position Control 19,5 14,8 14,6 15,8 16,6 17,2 17,7 18,1
Denmark Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Motors 13,1 10,0 9,8 10,6 11,2 11,6 12,0 12,2
Denmark Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Drives 13,1 10,0 9,8 10,6 11,2 11,6 12,0 12,2
Denmark Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Motors 2,2 1,7 1,6 1,8 1,9 1,9 2,0 2,0
Denmark Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Drives 2,2 1,7 1,6 1,8 1,9 1,9 2,0 2,0
Denmark Filling & Dosing Machinery Position Control 13,1 10,0 9,8 10,6 11,2 11,6 12,0 12,2
Denmark Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Motors 32,3 24,6 24,2 26,2 27,5 28,5 29,4 30,1
Denmark Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Drives 32,3 24,6 24,2 26,2 27,5 28,5 29,4 30,1
Denmark Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Motors 5,4 4,1 4,0 4,4 4,6 4,8 4,9 5,0
Denmark Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Drives 5,4 4,1 4,0 4,4 4,6 4,8 4,9 5,0
Denmark Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Position Control 32,3 24,6 24,2 26,2 27,5 28,5 29,4 30,1
Denmark Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Motors 11,8 9,0 8,9 9,6 10,1 10,5 10,8 11,0
Denmark Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Drives 11,8 9,0 8,9 9,6 10,1 10,5 10,8 11,0
Denmark Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Motors 2,0 1,5 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,7 1,8 1,8
Denmark Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Drives 2,0 1,5 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,7 1,8 1,8
Denmark Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Position Control 11,8 9,0 8,9 9,6 10,1 10,5 10,8 11,0
Denmark Palletising Machinery Servo Motors 1,1 0,8 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,0
Denmark Palletising Machinery Servo Drives 1,1 0,8 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,0
Denmark Palletising Machinery Stepper Motors 0,2 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2
Denmark Palletising Machinery Stepper Drives 0,2 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2
Denmark Palletising Machinery Position Control 1,1 0,8 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,0
Denmark Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Motors 6,7 5,1 5,0 5,4 5,7 5,9 6,1 6,2
Denmark Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Drives 6,7 5,1 5,0 5,4 5,7 5,9 6,1 6,2
Denmark Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Motors 1,1 0,9 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,0
Denmark Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Drives 1,1 0,9 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,0
Denmark Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Position Control 6,7 5,1 5,0 5,4 5,7 5,9 6,1 6,2
Denmark Other Packaging Machinery Servo Motors 30,5 23,3 22,9 24,7 26,0 26,9 27,8 28,4
Denmark Other Packaging Machinery Servo Drives 30,5 23,3 22,9 24,7 26,0 26,9 27,8 28,4
Denmark Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Motors 5,1 3,9 3,8 4,1 4,3 4,5 4,6 4,7
Denmark Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Drives 5,1 3,9 3,8 4,1 4,3 4,5 4,6 4,7
Denmark Other Packaging Machinery Position Control 30,5 23,3 22,9 24,7 26,0 26,9 27,8 28,4
Finland Bottling Line Machinery Servo Motors 4,4 3,6 3,9 4,3 4,5 4,7 4,8 4,9
Finland Bottling Line Machinery Servo Drives 4,4 3,6 3,9 4,3 4,5 4,7 4,8 4,9
Finland Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Motors 0,7 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,8
Finland Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Drives 0,7 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,8
Finland Bottling Line Machinery Position Control 4,4 3,6 3,9 4,3 4,5 4,7 4,8 4,9
Finland Cartoning Machinery Servo Motors 12,3 10,0 10,9 11,9 12,6 13,0 13,3 13,7
Finland Cartoning Machinery Servo Drives 12,3 10,0 10,9 11,9 12,6 13,0 13,3 13,7
Finland Cartoning Machinery Stepper Motors 2,1 1,7 1,8 2,0 2,1 2,2 2,2 2,3
Finland Cartoning Machinery Stepper Drives 2,1 1,7 1,8 2,0 2,1 2,2 2,2 2,3
Finland Cartoning Machinery Position Control 12,3 10,0 10,9 11,9 12,6 13,0 13,3 13,7
Finland Closing Machinery Servo Motors 12,7 10,2 11,2 12,2 12,9 13,3 13,6 14,1
Finland Closing Machinery Servo Drives 12,7 10,2 11,2 12,2 12,9 13,3 13,6 14,1
Finland Closing Machinery Stepper Motors 2,1 1,7 1,9 2,0 2,1 2,2 2,3 2,3
Finland Closing Machinery Stepper Drives 2,1 1,7 1,9 2,0 2,1 2,2 2,3 2,3
Finland Closing Machinery Position Control 12,7 10,2 11,2 12,2 12,9 13,3 13,6 14,1
Finland Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Motors 8,5 6,9 7,6 8,2 8,7 9,0 9,2 9,5
Finland Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Drives 8,5 6,9 7,6 8,2 8,7 9,0 9,2 9,5
Finland Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Motors 1,4 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,4 1,5 1,5 1,6
Finland Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Drives 1,4 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,4 1,5 1,5 1,6
Finland Filling & Dosing Machinery Position Control 8,5 6,9 7,6 8,2 8,7 9,0 9,2 9,5
Finland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Motors 21,0 17,0 18,6 20,3 21,4 22,1 22,6 23,4
Finland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Drives 21,0 17,0 18,6 20,3 21,4 22,1 22,6 23,4
Page 101
Attachment 5 (4)
Revenues for sub-components
Revenues in k€
Genuine Revenues Predicted revenues 11/2011
Country sector 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Finland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Motors 3,5 2,8 3,1 3,4 3,6 3,7 3,8 3,9
Finland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Drives 3,5 2,8 3,1 3,4 3,6 3,7 3,8 3,9
Finland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Position Control 21,0 17,0 18,6 20,3 21,4 22,1 22,6 23,4
Finland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Motors 7,7 6,2 6,8 7,4 7,8 8,1 8,3 8,6
Finland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Drives 7,7 6,2 6,8 7,4 7,8 8,1 8,3 8,6
Finland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Motors 1,3 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,4 1,4
Finland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Drives 1,3 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,4 1,4
Finland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Position Control 7,7 6,2 6,8 7,4 7,8 8,1 8,3 8,6
Finland Palletising Machinery Servo Motors 0,7 0,6 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,8
Finland Palletising Machinery Servo Drives 0,7 0,6 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,8
Finland Palletising Machinery Stepper Motors 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Finland Palletising Machinery Stepper Drives 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Finland Palletising Machinery Position Control 0,7 0,6 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,8
Finland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Motors 4,4 3,5 3,9 4,2 4,4 4,6 4,7 4,8
Finland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Drives 4,4 3,5 3,9 4,2 4,4 4,6 4,7 4,8
Finland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Motors 0,7 0,6 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,8
Finland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Drives 0,7 0,6 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,8
Finland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Position Control 4,4 3,5 3,9 4,2 4,4 4,6 4,7 4,8
Finland Other Packaging Machinery Servo Motors 19,9 16,0 17,6 19,1 20,2 20,9 21,4 22,1
Finland Other Packaging Machinery Servo Drives 19,9 16,0 17,6 19,1 20,2 20,9 21,4 22,1
Finland Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Motors 3,3 2,7 2,9 3,2 3,4 3,5 3,6 3,7
Finland Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Drives 3,3 2,7 2,9 3,2 3,4 3,5 3,6 3,7
Finland Other Packaging Machinery Position Control 19,9 16,0 17,6 19,1 20,2 20,9 21,4 22,1
France Bottling Line Machinery Servo Motors 105,7 99,3 105,5 114,0 118,9 123,1 125,7 128,5
France Bottling Line Machinery Servo Drives 105,7 99,3 105,5 114,0 118,9 123,1 125,7 128,5
France Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Motors 17,6 16,5 17,6 19,0 19,8 20,5 21,0 21,4
France Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Drives 17,6 16,5 17,6 19,0 19,8 20,5 21,0 21,4
France Bottling Line Machinery Position Control 105,7 99,3 105,5 114,0 118,9 123,1 125,7 128,5
France Cartoning Machinery Servo Motors 230,4 216,4 230,0 248,6 259,2 268,2 274,1 280,1
France Cartoning Machinery Servo Drives 230,4 216,4 230,0 248,6 259,2 268,2 274,1 280,1
France Cartoning Machinery Stepper Motors 38,4 36,1 38,3 41,4 43,2 44,7 45,7 46,7
France Cartoning Machinery Stepper Drives 38,4 36,1 38,3 41,4 43,2 44,7 45,7 46,7
France Cartoning Machinery Position Control 230,4 216,4 230,0 248,6 259,2 268,2 274,1 280,1
France Closing Machinery Servo Motors 106,8 100,3 106,6 115,2 120,1 124,3 127,0 129,8
France Closing Machinery Servo Drives 106,8 100,3 106,6 115,2 120,1 124,3 127,0 129,8
France Closing Machinery Stepper Motors 17,8 16,7 17,8 19,2 20,0 20,7 21,2 21,6
France Closing Machinery Stepper Drives 17,8 16,7 17,8 19,2 20,0 20,7 21,2 21,6
France Closing Machinery Position Control 106,8 100,3 106,6 115,2 120,1 124,3 127,0 129,8
France Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Motors 87,1 81,8 87,0 94,0 98,0 101,4 103,6 105,9
France Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Drives 87,1 81,8 87,0 94,0 98,0 101,4 103,6 105,9
France Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Motors 14,5 13,6 14,5 15,7 16,3 16,9 17,3 17,6
France Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Drives 14,5 13,6 14,5 15,7 16,3 16,9 17,3 17,6
France Filling & Dosing Machinery Position Control 87,1 81,8 87,0 94,0 98,0 101,4 103,6 105,9
France Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Motors 178,3 167,5 178,0 192,3 200,6 207,6 212,1 216,7
France Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Drives 178,3 167,5 178,0 192,3 200,6 207,6 212,1 216,7
France Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Motors 29,7 27,9 29,7 32,1 33,4 34,6 35,3 36,1
France Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Drives 29,7 27,9 29,7 32,1 33,4 34,6 35,3 36,1
France Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Position Control 178,3 167,5 178,0 192,3 200,6 207,6 212,1 216,7
France Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Motors 35,7 33,6 35,7 38,5 40,2 41,6 42,5 43,4
France Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Drives 35,7 33,6 35,7 38,5 40,2 41,6 42,5 43,4
France Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Motors 6,0 5,6 5,9 6,4 6,7 6,9 7,1 7,2
France Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Drives 6,0 5,6 5,9 6,4 6,7 6,9 7,1 7,2
France Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Position Control 35,7 33,6 35,7 38,5 40,2 41,6 42,5 43,4
France Palletising Machinery Servo Motors 18,7 17,6 18,7 20,2 21,1 21,8 22,3 22,8
France Palletising Machinery Servo Drives 18,7 17,6 18,7 20,2 21,1 21,8 22,3 22,8
France Palletising Machinery Stepper Motors 3,1 2,9 3,1 3,4 3,5 3,6 3,7 3,8
France Palletising Machinery Stepper Drives 3,1 2,9 3,1 3,4 3,5 3,6 3,7 3,8
France Palletising Machinery Position Control 18,7 17,6 18,7 20,2 21,1 21,8 22,3 22,8
France Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Motors 21,0 19,8 21,0 22,7 23,7 24,5 25,0 25,6
France Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Drives 21,0 19,8 21,0 22,7 23,7 24,5 25,0 25,6
France Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Motors 3,5 3,3 3,5 3,8 3,9 4,1 4,2 4,3
France Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Drives 3,5 3,3 3,5 3,8 3,9 4,1 4,2 4,3
France Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Position Control 21,0 19,8 21,0 22,7 23,7 24,5 25,0 25,6
France Other Packaging Machinery Servo Motors 97,0 91,1 96,8 104,7 109,1 112,9 115,4 117,9
France Other Packaging Machinery Servo Drives 97,0 91,1 96,8 104,7 109,1 112,9 115,4 117,9
France Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Motors 16,2 15,2 16,1 17,4 18,2 18,8 19,2 19,7
France Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Drives 16,2 15,2 16,1 17,4 18,2 18,8 19,2 19,7
France Other Packaging Machinery Position Control 97,0 91,1 96,8 104,7 109,1 112,9 115,4 117,9
Germany Bottling Line Machinery Servo Motors 2 439,1 1 987,4 2 285,7 2 522,4 2 662,5 2 770,5 2 863,5 2 959,6
Germany Bottling Line Machinery Servo Drives 2 439,1 1 987,4 2 285,7 2 522,4 2 662,5 2 770,5 2 863,5 2 959,6
Page 102
Attachment 5 (5)
Revenues for sub-components
Revenues in k€
Genuine Revenues Predicted revenues 11/2011
Country sector 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Germany Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Motors 406,5 331,2 380,9 420,4 443,7 461,7 477,2 493,3
Germany Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Drives 406,5 331,2 380,9 420,4 443,7 461,7 477,2 493,3
Germany Bottling Line Machinery Position Control 2 439,1 1 987,4 2 285,7 2 522,4 2 662,5 2 770,5 2 863,5 2 959,6
Germany Cartoning Machinery Servo Motors 1 862,1 1 517,3 1 745,0 1 925,7 2 032,6 2 115,1 2 186,1 2 259,4
Germany Cartoning Machinery Servo Drives 1 862,1 1 517,3 1 745,0 1 925,7 2 032,6 2 115,1 2 186,1 2 259,4
Germany Cartoning Machinery Stepper Motors 310,4 252,9 290,8 320,9 338,8 352,5 364,3 376,6
Germany Cartoning Machinery Stepper Drives 310,4 252,9 290,8 320,9 338,8 352,5 364,3 376,6
Germany Cartoning Machinery Position Control 1 862,1 1 517,3 1 745,0 1 925,7 2 032,6 2 115,1 2 186,1 2 259,4
Germany Closing Machinery Servo Motors 847,8 690,8 794,5 876,8 925,5 963,0 995,3 1 028,7
Germany Closing Machinery Servo Drives 847,8 690,8 794,5 876,8 925,5 963,0 995,3 1 028,7
Germany Closing Machinery Stepper Motors 141,3 115,1 132,4 146,1 154,2 160,5 165,9 171,5
Germany Closing Machinery Stepper Drives 141,3 115,1 132,4 146,1 154,2 160,5 165,9 171,5
Germany Closing Machinery Position Control 847,8 690,8 794,5 876,8 925,5 963,0 995,3 1 028,7
Germany Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Motors 531,4 433,0 498,0 549,5 580,1 603,6 623,8 644,8
Germany Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Drives 531,4 433,0 498,0 549,5 580,1 603,6 623,8 644,8
Germany Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Motors 88,6 72,2 83,0 91,6 96,7 100,6 104,0 107,5
Germany Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Drives 88,6 72,2 83,0 91,6 96,7 100,6 104,0 107,5
Germany Filling & Dosing Machinery Position Control 531,4 433,0 498,0 549,5 580,1 603,6 623,8 644,8
Germany Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Motors 1 666,0 1 357,5 1 561,2 1 722,9 1 818,6 1 892,4 1 955,9 2 021,5
Germany Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Drives 1 666,0 1 357,5 1 561,2 1 722,9 1 818,6 1 892,4 1 955,9 2 021,5
Germany Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Motors 277,7 226,3 260,2 287,1 303,1 315,4 326,0 336,9
Germany Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Drives 277,7 226,3 260,2 287,1 303,1 315,4 326,0 336,9
Germany Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Position Control 1 666,0 1 357,5 1 561,2 1 722,9 1 818,6 1 892,4 1 955,9 2 021,5
Germany Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Motors 478,1 389,6 448,1 494,5 521,9 543,1 561,3 580,2
Germany Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Drives 478,1 389,6 448,1 494,5 521,9 543,1 561,3 580,2
Germany Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Motors 79,7 64,9 74,7 82,4 87,0 90,5 93,6 96,7
Germany Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Drives 79,7 64,9 74,7 82,4 87,0 90,5 93,6 96,7
Germany Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Position Control 478,1 389,6 448,1 494,5 521,9 543,1 561,3 580,2
Germany Palletising Machinery Servo Motors 290,9 237,0 272,6 300,8 317,6 330,4 341,5 353,0
Germany Palletising Machinery Servo Drives 290,9 237,0 272,6 300,8 317,6 330,4 341,5 353,0
Germany Palletising Machinery Stepper Motors 48,5 39,5 45,4 50,1 52,9 55,1 56,9 58,8
Germany Palletising Machinery Stepper Drives 48,5 39,5 45,4 50,1 52,9 55,1 56,9 58,8
Germany Palletising Machinery Position Control 290,9 237,0 272,6 300,8 317,6 330,4 341,5 353,0
Germany Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Motors 178,3 145,3 167,1 184,4 194,6 202,5 209,3 216,4
Germany Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Drives 178,3 145,3 167,1 184,4 194,6 202,5 209,3 216,4
Germany Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Motors 29,7 24,2 27,8 30,7 32,4 33,8 34,9 36,1
Germany Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Drives 29,7 24,2 27,8 30,7 32,4 33,8 34,9 36,1
Germany Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Position Control 178,3 145,3 167,1 184,4 194,6 202,5 209,3 216,4
Germany Other Packaging Machinery Servo Motors 536,2 436,9 502,4 554,5 585,3 609,0 629,5 650,6
Germany Other Packaging Machinery Servo Drives 536,2 436,9 502,4 554,5 585,3 609,0 629,5 650,6
Germany Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Motors 89,4 72,8 83,7 92,4 97,5 101,5 104,9 108,4
Germany Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Drives 89,4 72,8 83,7 92,4 97,5 101,5 104,9 108,4
Germany Other Packaging Machinery Position Control 536,2 436,9 502,4 554,5 585,3 609,0 629,5 650,6
Greece Bottling Line Machinery Servo Motors 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Bottling Line Machinery Servo Drives 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Motors 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Drives 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Bottling Line Machinery Position Control 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Cartoning Machinery Servo Motors 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Greece Cartoning Machinery Servo Drives 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Greece Cartoning Machinery Stepper Motors 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Cartoning Machinery Stepper Drives 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Cartoning Machinery Position Control 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Greece Closing Machinery Servo Motors 0,2 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Greece Closing Machinery Servo Drives 0,2 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Greece Closing Machinery Stepper Motors 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Closing Machinery Stepper Drives 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Closing Machinery Position Control 0,2 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Greece Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Motors 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Greece Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Drives 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Greece Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Motors 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Drives 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Filling & Dosing Machinery Position Control 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Greece Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Motors 0,2 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Greece Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Drives 0,2 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Greece Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Motors 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Drives 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Position Control 0,2 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Greece Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Motors 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Greece Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Drives 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Page 103
Attachment 5 (6)
Revenues for sub-components
Revenues in k€
Genuine Revenues Predicted revenues 11/2011
Country sector 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Greece Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Motors 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Drives 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Position Control 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Greece Palletising Machinery Servo Motors 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Palletising Machinery Servo Drives 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Palletising Machinery Stepper Motors 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Palletising Machinery Stepper Drives 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Palletising Machinery Position Control 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Motors 0,1 0,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,1
Greece Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Drives 0,1 0,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,1
Greece Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Motors 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Drives 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Position Control 0,1 0,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,1
Greece Other Packaging Machinery Servo Motors 0,2 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Greece Other Packaging Machinery Servo Drives 0,2 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Greece Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Motors 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Drives 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Greece Other Packaging Machinery Position Control 0,2 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Hungary Bottling Line Machinery Servo Motors 0,8 0,7 0,9 1,1 1,3 1,4 1,6 1,8
Hungary Bottling Line Machinery Servo Drives 0,8 0,7 0,9 1,1 1,3 1,4 1,6 1,8
Hungary Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Motors 0,1 0,1 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,3 0,3
Hungary Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Drives 0,1 0,1 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,3 0,3
Hungary Bottling Line Machinery Position Control 0,8 0,7 0,9 1,1 1,3 1,4 1,6 1,8
Hungary Cartoning Machinery Servo Motors 4,3 3,4 4,8 5,8 6,6 7,3 8,2 9,1
Hungary Cartoning Machinery Servo Drives 4,3 3,4 4,8 5,8 6,6 7,3 8,2 9,1
Hungary Cartoning Machinery Stepper Motors 0,7 0,6 0,8 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,4 1,5
Hungary Cartoning Machinery Stepper Drives 0,7 0,6 0,8 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,4 1,5
Hungary Cartoning Machinery Position Control 4,3 3,4 4,8 5,8 6,6 7,3 8,2 9,1
Hungary Closing Machinery Servo Motors 4,9 3,8 5,4 6,5 7,4 8,2 9,2 10,3
Hungary Closing Machinery Servo Drives 4,9 3,8 5,4 6,5 7,4 8,2 9,2 10,3
Hungary Closing Machinery Stepper Motors 0,8 0,6 0,9 1,1 1,2 1,4 1,5 1,7
Hungary Closing Machinery Stepper Drives 0,8 0,6 0,9 1,1 1,2 1,4 1,5 1,7
Hungary Closing Machinery Position Control 4,9 3,8 5,4 6,5 7,4 8,2 9,2 10,3
Hungary Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Motors 3,7 2,8 4,0 4,9 5,5 6,2 6,9 7,7
Hungary Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Drives 3,7 2,8 4,0 4,9 5,5 6,2 6,9 7,7
Hungary Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Motors 0,6 0,5 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,2 1,3
Hungary Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Drives 0,6 0,5 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,2 1,3
Hungary Filling & Dosing Machinery Position Control 3,7 2,8 4,0 4,9 5,5 6,2 6,9 7,7
Hungary Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Motors 6,1 4,7 6,7 8,1 9,1 10,2 11,4 12,7
Hungary Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Drives 6,1 4,7 6,7 8,1 9,1 10,2 11,4 12,7
Hungary Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Motors 1,0 0,8 1,1 1,3 1,5 1,7 1,9 2,1
Hungary Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Drives 1,0 0,8 1,1 1,3 1,5 1,7 1,9 2,1
Hungary Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Position Control 6,1 4,7 6,7 8,1 9,1 10,2 11,4 12,7
Hungary Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Motors 2,9 2,2 3,2 3,8 4,3 4,8 5,4 6,0
Hungary Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Drives 2,9 2,2 3,2 3,8 4,3 4,8 5,4 6,0
Hungary Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Motors 0,5 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0
Hungary Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Drives 0,5 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0
Hungary Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Position Control 2,9 2,2 3,2 3,8 4,3 4,8 5,4 6,0
Hungary Palletising Machinery Servo Motors 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,3 0,3 0,4 0,4 0,5
Hungary Palletising Machinery Servo Drives 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,3 0,3 0,4 0,4 0,5
Hungary Palletising Machinery Stepper Motors 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Hungary Palletising Machinery Stepper Drives 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Hungary Palletising Machinery Position Control 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,3 0,3 0,4 0,4 0,5
Hungary Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Motors 2,5 2,0 2,8 3,4 3,8 4,2 4,7 5,3
Hungary Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Drives 2,5 2,0 2,8 3,4 3,8 4,2 4,7 5,3
Hungary Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Motors 0,4 0,3 0,5 0,6 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
Hungary Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Drives 0,4 0,3 0,5 0,6 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
Hungary Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Position Control 2,5 2,0 2,8 3,4 3,8 4,2 4,7 5,3
Hungary Other Packaging Machinery Servo Motors 6,0 4,6 6,6 8,0 9,0 10,0 11,2 12,5
Hungary Other Packaging Machinery Servo Drives 6,0 4,6 6,6 8,0 9,0 10,0 11,2 12,5
Hungary Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Motors 1,0 0,8 1,1 1,3 1,5 1,7 1,9 2,1
Hungary Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Drives 1,0 0,8 1,1 1,3 1,5 1,7 1,9 2,1
Hungary Other Packaging Machinery Position Control 6,0 4,6 6,6 8,0 9,0 10,0 11,2 12,5
Italy Bottling Line Machinery Servo Motors 263,6 222,4 250,0 274,5 286,5 294,9 301,9 308,3
Italy Bottling Line Machinery Servo Drives 263,6 222,4 250,0 274,5 286,5 294,9 301,9 308,3
Italy Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Motors 43,9 37,1 41,7 45,7 47,8 49,1 50,3 51,4
Italy Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Drives 43,9 37,1 41,7 45,7 47,8 49,1 50,3 51,4
Italy Bottling Line Machinery Position Control 263,6 222,4 250,0 274,5 286,5 294,9 301,9 308,3
Italy Cartoning Machinery Servo Motors 1 742,8 1 470,5 1 652,8 1 814,8 1 894,7 1 949,7 1 996,5 2 038,5
Italy Cartoning Machinery Servo Drives 1 742,8 1 470,5 1 652,8 1 814,8 1 894,7 1 949,7 1 996,5 2 038,5
Page 104
Attachment 5 (7)
Revenues for sub-components
Revenues in k€
Genuine Revenues Predicted revenues 11/2011
Country sector 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Italy Cartoning Machinery Stepper Motors 290,5 245,1 275,5 302,5 315,8 324,9 332,8 339,8
Italy Cartoning Machinery Stepper Drives 290,5 245,1 275,5 302,5 315,8 324,9 332,8 339,8
Italy Cartoning Machinery Position Control 1 742,8 1 470,5 1 652,8 1 814,8 1 894,7 1 949,7 1 996,5 2 038,5
Italy Closing Machinery Servo Motors 435,6 367,5 413,1 453,6 473,6 487,3 499,0 509,5
Italy Closing Machinery Servo Drives 435,6 367,5 413,1 453,6 473,6 487,3 499,0 509,5
Italy Closing Machinery Stepper Motors 72,6 61,3 68,9 75,6 78,9 81,2 83,2 84,9
Italy Closing Machinery Stepper Drives 72,6 61,3 68,9 75,6 78,9 81,2 83,2 84,9
Italy Closing Machinery Position Control 435,6 367,5 413,1 453,6 473,6 487,3 499,0 509,5
Italy Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Motors 446,2 376,5 423,2 464,7 485,1 499,2 511,2 522,0
Italy Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Drives 446,2 376,5 423,2 464,7 485,1 499,2 511,2 522,0
Italy Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Motors 74,4 62,8 70,5 77,4 80,9 83,2 85,2 87,0
Italy Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Drives 74,4 62,8 70,5 77,4 80,9 83,2 85,2 87,0
Italy Filling & Dosing Machinery Position Control 446,2 376,5 423,2 464,7 485,1 499,2 511,2 522,0
Italy Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Motors 1 243,6 1 049,3 1 179,4 1 295,0 1 352,0 1 391,2 1 424,7 1 454,6
Italy Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Drives 1 243,6 1 049,3 1 179,4 1 295,0 1 352,0 1 391,2 1 424,7 1 454,6
Italy Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Motors 207,3 174,9 196,6 215,8 225,3 231,9 237,4 242,4
Italy Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Drives 207,3 174,9 196,6 215,8 225,3 231,9 237,4 242,4
Italy Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Position Control 1 243,6 1 049,3 1 179,4 1 295,0 1 352,0 1 391,2 1 424,7 1 454,6
Italy Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Motors 298,2 251,6 282,8 310,6 324,2 333,6 341,7 348,9
Italy Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Drives 298,2 251,6 282,8 310,6 324,2 333,6 341,7 348,9
Italy Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Motors 49,7 41,9 47,1 51,8 54,0 55,6 56,9 58,1
Italy Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Drives 49,7 41,9 47,1 51,8 54,0 55,6 56,9 58,1
Italy Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Position Control 298,2 251,6 282,8 310,6 324,2 333,6 341,7 348,9
Italy Palletising Machinery Servo Motors 99,4 83,9 94,3 103,6 108,1 111,3 113,9 116,3
Italy Palletising Machinery Servo Drives 99,4 83,9 94,3 103,6 108,1 111,3 113,9 116,3
Italy Palletising Machinery Stepper Motors 16,6 14,0 15,7 17,3 18,0 18,5 19,0 19,4
Italy Palletising Machinery Stepper Drives 16,6 14,0 15,7 17,3 18,0 18,5 19,0 19,4
Italy Palletising Machinery Position Control 99,4 83,9 94,3 103,6 108,1 111,3 113,9 116,3
Italy Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Motors 211,8 178,7 200,9 220,6 230,3 237,0 242,7 247,8
Italy Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Drives 211,8 178,7 200,9 220,6 230,3 237,0 242,7 247,8
Italy Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Motors 35,3 29,8 33,5 36,8 38,4 39,5 40,4 41,3
Italy Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Drives 35,3 29,8 33,5 36,8 38,4 39,5 40,4 41,3
Italy Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Position Control 211,8 178,7 200,9 220,6 230,3 237,0 242,7 247,8
Italy Other Packaging Machinery Servo Motors 536,5 452,7 508,8 558,7 583,3 600,2 614,6 627,6
Italy Other Packaging Machinery Servo Drives 536,5 452,7 508,8 558,7 583,3 600,2 614,6 627,6
Italy Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Motors 89,4 75,4 84,8 93,1 97,2 100,0 102,4 104,6
Italy Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Drives 89,4 75,4 84,8 93,1 97,2 100,0 102,4 104,6
Italy Other Packaging Machinery Position Control 536,5 452,7 508,8 558,7 583,3 600,2 614,6 627,6
Netherlands Bottling Line Machinery Servo Motors 21,1 18,3 20,5 21,6 22,3 23,1 23,7 24,4
Netherlands Bottling Line Machinery Servo Drives 21,1 18,3 20,5 21,6 22,3 23,1 23,7 24,4
Netherlands Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Motors 3,5 3,0 3,4 3,6 3,7 3,8 4,0 4,1
Netherlands Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Drives 3,5 3,0 3,4 3,6 3,7 3,8 4,0 4,1
Netherlands Bottling Line Machinery Position Control 21,1 18,3 20,5 21,6 22,3 23,1 23,7 24,4
Netherlands Cartoning Machinery Servo Motors 106,4 92,2 103,2 109,0 112,6 116,2 119,6 122,9
Netherlands Cartoning Machinery Servo Drives 106,4 92,2 103,2 109,0 112,6 116,2 119,6 122,9
Netherlands Cartoning Machinery Stepper Motors 17,7 15,4 17,2 18,2 18,8 19,4 19,9 20,5
Netherlands Cartoning Machinery Stepper Drives 17,7 15,4 17,2 18,2 18,8 19,4 19,9 20,5
Netherlands Cartoning Machinery Position Control 106,4 92,2 103,2 109,0 112,6 116,2 119,6 122,9
Netherlands Closing Machinery Servo Motors 62,5 54,2 60,6 64,1 66,2 68,3 70,3 72,2
Netherlands Closing Machinery Servo Drives 62,5 54,2 60,6 64,1 66,2 68,3 70,3 72,2
Netherlands Closing Machinery Stepper Motors 10,4 9,0 10,1 10,7 11,0 11,4 11,7 12,0
Netherlands Closing Machinery Stepper Drives 10,4 9,0 10,1 10,7 11,0 11,4 11,7 12,0
Netherlands Closing Machinery Position Control 62,5 54,2 60,6 64,1 66,2 68,3 70,3 72,2
Netherlands Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Motors 35,2 30,5 34,2 36,1 37,3 38,5 39,6 40,7
Netherlands Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Drives 35,2 30,5 34,2 36,1 37,3 38,5 39,6 40,7
Netherlands Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Motors 5,9 5,1 5,7 6,0 6,2 6,4 6,6 6,8
Netherlands Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Drives 5,9 5,1 5,7 6,0 6,2 6,4 6,6 6,8
Netherlands Filling & Dosing Machinery Position Control 35,2 30,5 34,2 36,1 37,3 38,5 39,6 40,7
Netherlands Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Motors 72,0 62,4 69,8 73,8 76,2 78,6 81,0 83,2
Netherlands Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Drives 72,0 62,4 69,8 73,8 76,2 78,6 81,0 83,2
Netherlands Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Motors 12,0 10,4 11,6 12,3 12,7 13,1 13,5 13,9
Netherlands Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Drives 12,0 10,4 11,6 12,3 12,7 13,1 13,5 13,9
Netherlands Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Position Control 72,0 62,4 69,8 73,8 76,2 78,6 81,0 83,2
Netherlands Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Motors 24,8 21,5 24,1 25,4 26,3 27,1 27,9 28,7
Netherlands Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Drives 24,8 21,5 24,1 25,4 26,3 27,1 27,9 28,7
Netherlands Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Motors 4,1 3,6 4,0 4,2 4,4 4,5 4,7 4,8
Netherlands Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Drives 4,1 3,6 4,0 4,2 4,4 4,5 4,7 4,8
Netherlands Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Position Control 24,8 21,5 24,1 25,4 26,3 27,1 27,9 28,7
Netherlands Palletising Machinery Servo Motors 8,2 7,1 7,9 8,4 8,6 8,9 9,2 9,4
Netherlands Palletising Machinery Servo Drives 8,2 7,1 7,9 8,4 8,6 8,9 9,2 9,4
Page 105
Attachment 5 (8)
Revenues for sub-components
Revenues in k€
Genuine Revenues Predicted revenues 11/2011
Country sector 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Netherlands Palletising Machinery Stepper Motors 1,4 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,4 1,5 1,5 1,6
Netherlands Palletising Machinery Stepper Drives 1,4 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,4 1,5 1,5 1,6
Netherlands Palletising Machinery Position Control 8,2 7,1 7,9 8,4 8,6 8,9 9,2 9,4
Netherlands Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Motors 13,5 11,7 13,1 13,9 14,3 14,8 15,2 15,7
Netherlands Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Drives 13,5 11,7 13,1 13,9 14,3 14,8 15,2 15,7
Netherlands Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Motors 2,3 2,0 2,2 2,3 2,4 2,5 2,5 2,6
Netherlands Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Drives 2,3 2,0 2,2 2,3 2,4 2,5 2,5 2,6
Netherlands Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Position Control 13,5 11,7 13,1 13,9 14,3 14,8 15,2 15,7
Netherlands Other Packaging Machinery Servo Motors 69,8 60,5 67,7 71,5 73,9 76,3 78,5 80,6
Netherlands Other Packaging Machinery Servo Drives 69,8 60,5 67,7 71,5 73,9 76,3 78,5 80,6
Netherlands Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Motors 11,6 10,1 11,3 11,9 12,3 12,7 13,1 13,4
Netherlands Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Drives 11,6 10,1 11,3 11,9 12,3 12,7 13,1 13,4
Netherlands Other Packaging Machinery Position Control 69,8 60,5 67,7 71,5 73,9 76,3 78,5 80,6
Norway Bottling Line Machinery Servo Motors 4,8 5,0 5,2 5,5 5,8 6,0 6,2 6,3
Norway Bottling Line Machinery Servo Drives 4,8 5,0 5,2 5,5 5,8 6,0 6,2 6,3
Norway Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Motors 0,8 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,1
Norway Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Drives 0,8 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,1
Norway Bottling Line Machinery Position Control 4,8 5,0 5,2 5,5 5,8 6,0 6,2 6,3
Norway Cartoning Machinery Servo Motors 13,3 13,9 14,5 15,4 16,2 16,8 17,2 17,7
Norway Cartoning Machinery Servo Drives 13,3 13,9 14,5 15,4 16,2 16,8 17,2 17,7
Norway Cartoning Machinery Stepper Motors 2,2 2,3 2,4 2,6 2,7 2,8 2,9 2,9
Norway Cartoning Machinery Stepper Drives 2,2 2,3 2,4 2,6 2,7 2,8 2,9 2,9
Norway Cartoning Machinery Position Control 13,3 13,9 14,5 15,4 16,2 16,8 17,2 17,7
Norway Closing Machinery Servo Motors 13,7 14,2 14,8 15,8 16,7 17,2 17,7 18,1
Norway Closing Machinery Servo Drives 13,7 14,2 14,8 15,8 16,7 17,2 17,7 18,1
Norway Closing Machinery Stepper Motors 2,3 2,4 2,5 2,6 2,8 2,9 2,9 3,0
Norway Closing Machinery Stepper Drives 2,3 2,4 2,5 2,6 2,8 2,9 2,9 3,0
Norway Closing Machinery Position Control 13,7 14,2 14,8 15,8 16,7 17,2 17,7 18,1
Norway Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Motors 9,2 9,6 10,0 10,7 11,2 11,6 11,9 12,2
Norway Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Drives 9,2 9,6 10,0 10,7 11,2 11,6 11,9 12,2
Norway Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Motors 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,8 1,9 1,9 2,0 2,0
Norway Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Drives 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,8 1,9 1,9 2,0 2,0
Norway Filling & Dosing Machinery Position Control 9,2 9,6 10,0 10,7 11,2 11,6 11,9 12,2
Norway Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Motors 22,7 23,7 24,6 26,3 27,7 28,6 29,4 30,1
Norway Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Drives 22,7 23,7 24,6 26,3 27,7 28,6 29,4 30,1
Norway Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Motors 3,8 3,9 4,1 4,4 4,6 4,8 4,9 5,0
Norway Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Drives 3,8 3,9 4,1 4,4 4,6 4,8 4,9 5,0
Norway Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Position Control 22,7 23,7 24,6 26,3 27,7 28,6 29,4 30,1
Norway Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Motors 8,3 8,7 9,0 9,6 10,1 10,5 10,8 11,1
Norway Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Drives 8,3 8,7 9,0 9,6 10,1 10,5 10,8 11,1
Norway Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Motors 1,4 1,4 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,7 1,8 1,8
Norway Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Drives 1,4 1,4 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,7 1,8 1,8
Norway Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Position Control 8,3 8,7 9,0 9,6 10,1 10,5 10,8 11,1
Norway Palletising Machinery Servo Motors 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,0
Norway Palletising Machinery Servo Drives 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,0
Norway Palletising Machinery Stepper Motors 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2
Norway Palletising Machinery Stepper Drives 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2
Norway Palletising Machinery Position Control 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,0
Norway Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Motors 4,7 4,9 5,1 5,5 5,7 5,9 6,1 6,2
Norway Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Drives 4,7 4,9 5,1 5,5 5,7 5,9 6,1 6,2
Norway Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Motors 0,8 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,0
Norway Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Drives 0,8 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,0
Norway Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Position Control 4,7 4,9 5,1 5,5 5,7 5,9 6,1 6,2
Norway Other Packaging Machinery Servo Motors 21,5 22,3 23,3 24,8 26,1 27,0 27,7 28,4
Norway Other Packaging Machinery Servo Drives 21,5 22,3 23,3 24,8 26,1 27,0 27,7 28,4
Norway Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Motors 3,6 3,7 3,9 4,1 4,4 4,5 4,6 4,7
Norway Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Drives 3,6 3,7 3,9 4,1 4,4 4,5 4,6 4,7
Norway Other Packaging Machinery Position Control 21,5 22,3 23,3 24,8 26,1 27,0 27,7 28,4
Poland Bottling Line Machinery Servo Motors 2,4 1,2 1,3 1,5 1,7 1,8 2,0 2,1
Poland Bottling Line Machinery Servo Drives 2,4 1,2 1,3 1,5 1,7 1,8 2,0 2,1
Poland Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Motors 0,4 0,2 0,2 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,4
Poland Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Drives 0,4 0,2 0,2 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,4
Poland Bottling Line Machinery Position Control 2,4 1,2 1,3 1,5 1,7 1,8 2,0 2,1
Poland Cartoning Machinery Servo Motors 12,0 6,1 6,8 7,6 8,4 9,1 10,0 10,8
Poland Cartoning Machinery Servo Drives 12,0 6,1 6,8 7,6 8,4 9,1 10,0 10,8
Poland Cartoning Machinery Stepper Motors 2,0 1,0 1,1 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,7 1,8
Poland Cartoning Machinery Stepper Drives 2,0 1,0 1,1 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,7 1,8
Poland Cartoning Machinery Position Control 12,0 6,1 6,8 7,6 8,4 9,1 10,0 10,8
Poland Closing Machinery Servo Motors 2,7 1,4 1,5 1,7 1,9 2,0 2,2 2,4
Poland Closing Machinery Servo Drives 2,7 1,4 1,5 1,7 1,9 2,0 2,2 2,4
Page 106
Attachment 5 (9)
Revenues for sub-components
Revenues in k€
Genuine Revenues Predicted revenues 11/2011
Country sector 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Poland Closing Machinery Stepper Motors 0,4 0,2 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,4 0,4
Poland Closing Machinery Stepper Drives 0,4 0,2 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,4 0,4
Poland Closing Machinery Position Control 2,7 1,4 1,5 1,7 1,9 2,0 2,2 2,4
Poland Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Motors 5,5 2,8 3,1 3,5 3,8 4,2 4,6 4,9
Poland Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Drives 5,5 2,8 3,1 3,5 3,8 4,2 4,6 4,9
Poland Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Motors 0,9 0,5 0,5 0,6 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,8
Poland Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Drives 0,9 0,5 0,5 0,6 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,8
Poland Filling & Dosing Machinery Position Control 5,5 2,8 3,1 3,5 3,8 4,2 4,6 4,9
Poland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Motors 10,8 5,5 6,1 6,9 7,6 8,2 9,0 9,7
Poland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Drives 10,8 5,5 6,1 6,9 7,6 8,2 9,0 9,7
Poland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Motors 1,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,6
Poland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Drives 1,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,6
Poland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Position Control 10,8 5,5 6,1 6,9 7,6 8,2 9,0 9,7
Poland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Motors 4,0 2,0 2,3 2,5 2,8 3,0 3,3 3,6
Poland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Drives 4,0 2,0 2,3 2,5 2,8 3,0 3,3 3,6
Poland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Motors 0,7 0,3 0,4 0,4 0,5 0,5 0,6 0,6
Poland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Drives 0,7 0,3 0,4 0,4 0,5 0,5 0,6 0,6
Poland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Position Control 4,0 2,0 2,3 2,5 2,8 3,0 3,3 3,6
Poland Palletising Machinery Servo Motors 0,4 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3
Poland Palletising Machinery Servo Drives 0,4 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3
Poland Palletising Machinery Stepper Motors 0,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,1 0,1
Poland Palletising Machinery Stepper Drives 0,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,1 0,1
Poland Palletising Machinery Position Control 0,4 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3
Poland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Motors 1,8 0,9 1,0 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,6
Poland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Drives 1,8 0,9 1,0 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,6
Poland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Motors 0,3 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,3 0,3
Poland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Drives 0,3 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,3 0,3
Poland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Position Control 1,8 0,9 1,0 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,6
Poland Other Packaging Machinery Servo Motors 7,2 3,6 4,1 4,6 5,0 5,5 6,0 6,5
Poland Other Packaging Machinery Servo Drives 7,2 3,6 4,1 4,6 5,0 5,5 6,0 6,5
Poland Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Motors 1,2 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1
Poland Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Drives 1,2 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1
Poland Other Packaging Machinery Position Control 7,2 3,6 4,1 4,6 5,0 5,5 6,0 6,5
Portugal Bottling Line Machinery Servo Motors 0,3 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4
Portugal Bottling Line Machinery Servo Drives 0,3 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4
Portugal Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Motors 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Portugal Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Drives 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Portugal Bottling Line Machinery Position Control 0,3 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4
Portugal Cartoning Machinery Servo Motors 1,8 2,0 2,0 2,1 2,1 2,1 2,2 2,3
Portugal Cartoning Machinery Servo Drives 1,8 2,0 2,0 2,1 2,1 2,1 2,2 2,3
Portugal Cartoning Machinery Stepper Motors 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,4 0,4 0,4
Portugal Cartoning Machinery Stepper Drives 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,4 0,4 0,4
Portugal Cartoning Machinery Position Control 1,8 2,0 2,0 2,1 2,1 2,1 2,2 2,3
Portugal Closing Machinery Servo Motors 1,4 1,6 1,6 1,7 1,7 1,7 1,8 1,8
Portugal Closing Machinery Servo Drives 1,4 1,6 1,6 1,7 1,7 1,7 1,8 1,8
Portugal Closing Machinery Stepper Motors 0,2 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3
Portugal Closing Machinery Stepper Drives 0,2 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3
Portugal Closing Machinery Position Control 1,4 1,6 1,6 1,7 1,7 1,7 1,8 1,8
Portugal Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Motors 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,7 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,8
Portugal Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Drives 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,7 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,8
Portugal Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Motors 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Portugal Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Drives 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Portugal Filling & Dosing Machinery Position Control 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,7 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,8
Portugal Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Motors 2,7 3,1 3,1 3,2 3,2 3,2 3,3 3,4
Portugal Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Drives 2,7 3,1 3,1 3,2 3,2 3,2 3,3 3,4
Portugal Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Motors 0,4 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,6 0,6
Portugal Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Drives 0,4 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,6 0,6
Portugal Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Position Control 2,7 3,1 3,1 3,2 3,2 3,2 3,3 3,4
Portugal Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Motors 0,4 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,6
Portugal Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Drives 0,4 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,6
Portugal Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Motors 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Portugal Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Drives 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Portugal Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Position Control 0,4 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,6
Portugal Palletising Machinery Servo Motors 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Portugal Palletising Machinery Servo Drives 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Portugal Palletising Machinery Stepper Motors 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Portugal Palletising Machinery Stepper Drives 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Portugal Palletising Machinery Position Control 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
Portugal Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Motors 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,3 0,3 0,3
Portugal Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Drives 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,3 0,3 0,3
Page 107
Attachment 5 (10)
Revenues for sub-components
Revenues in k€
Genuine Revenues Predicted revenues 11/2011
Country sector 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Portugal Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Motors 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Portugal Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Drives 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Portugal Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Position Control 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,3 0,3 0,3
Portugal Other Packaging Machinery Servo Motors 1,1 1,2 1,2 1,3 1,3 1,3 1,3 1,4
Portugal Other Packaging Machinery Servo Drives 1,1 1,2 1,2 1,3 1,3 1,3 1,3 1,4
Portugal Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Motors 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2
Portugal Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Drives 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2
Portugal Other Packaging Machinery Position Control 1,1 1,2 1,2 1,3 1,3 1,3 1,3 1,4
Spain Bottling Line Machinery Servo Motors 44,5 34,4 32,9 35,0 36,5 38,2 39,5 41,1
Spain Bottling Line Machinery Servo Drives 44,5 34,4 32,9 35,0 36,5 38,2 39,5 41,1
Spain Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Motors 7,4 5,7 5,5 5,8 6,1 6,4 6,6 6,8
Spain Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Drives 7,4 5,7 5,5 5,8 6,1 6,4 6,6 6,8
Spain Bottling Line Machinery Position Control 44,5 34,4 32,9 35,0 36,5 38,2 39,5 41,1
Spain Cartoning Machinery Servo Motors 227,0 175,6 168,1 178,8 186,1 194,9 201,8 209,6
Spain Cartoning Machinery Servo Drives 227,0 175,6 168,1 178,8 186,1 194,9 201,8 209,6
Spain Cartoning Machinery Stepper Motors 37,8 29,3 28,0 29,8 31,0 32,5 33,6 34,9
Spain Cartoning Machinery Stepper Drives 37,8 29,3 28,0 29,8 31,0 32,5 33,6 34,9
Spain Cartoning Machinery Position Control 227,0 175,6 168,1 178,8 186,1 194,9 201,8 209,6
Spain Closing Machinery Servo Motors 181,3 140,2 134,2 142,8 148,7 155,7 161,1 167,4
Spain Closing Machinery Servo Drives 181,3 140,2 134,2 142,8 148,7 155,7 161,1 167,4
Spain Closing Machinery Stepper Motors 30,2 23,4 22,4 23,8 24,8 25,9 26,9 27,9
Spain Closing Machinery Stepper Drives 30,2 23,4 22,4 23,8 24,8 25,9 26,9 27,9
Spain Closing Machinery Position Control 181,3 140,2 134,2 142,8 148,7 155,7 161,1 167,4
Spain Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Motors 77,7 60,1 57,5 61,2 63,7 66,7 69,1 71,8
Spain Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Drives 77,7 60,1 57,5 61,2 63,7 66,7 69,1 71,8
Spain Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Motors 13,0 10,0 9,6 10,2 10,6 11,1 11,5 12,0
Spain Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Drives 13,0 10,0 9,6 10,2 10,6 11,1 11,5 12,0
Spain Filling & Dosing Machinery Position Control 77,7 60,1 57,5 61,2 63,7 66,7 69,1 71,8
Spain Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Motors 345,3 267,1 255,6 272,1 283,2 296,5 306,9 318,9
Spain Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Drives 345,3 267,1 255,6 272,1 283,2 296,5 306,9 318,9
Spain Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Motors 57,6 44,5 42,6 45,3 47,2 49,4 51,2 53,1
Spain Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Drives 57,6 44,5 42,6 45,3 47,2 49,4 51,2 53,1
Spain Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Position Control 345,3 267,1 255,6 272,1 283,2 296,5 306,9 318,9
Spain Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Motors 56,8 43,9 42,1 44,8 46,6 48,8 50,5 52,5
Spain Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Drives 56,8 43,9 42,1 44,8 46,6 48,8 50,5 52,5
Spain Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Motors 9,5 7,3 7,0 7,5 7,8 8,1 8,4 8,7
Spain Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Drives 9,5 7,3 7,0 7,5 7,8 8,1 8,4 8,7
Spain Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Position Control 56,8 43,9 42,1 44,8 46,6 48,8 50,5 52,5
Spain Palletising Machinery Servo Motors 10,7 8,2 7,9 8,4 8,7 9,2 9,5 9,8
Spain Palletising Machinery Servo Drives 10,7 8,2 7,9 8,4 8,7 9,2 9,5 9,8
Spain Palletising Machinery Stepper Motors 1,8 1,4 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,5 1,6 1,6
Spain Palletising Machinery Stepper Drives 1,8 1,4 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,5 1,6 1,6
Spain Palletising Machinery Position Control 10,7 8,2 7,9 8,4 8,7 9,2 9,5 9,8
Spain Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Motors 26,8 20,7 19,8 21,1 22,0 23,0 23,8 24,7
Spain Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Drives 26,8 20,7 19,8 21,1 22,0 23,0 23,8 24,7
Spain Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Motors 4,5 3,5 3,3 3,5 3,7 3,8 4,0 4,1
Spain Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Drives 4,5 3,5 3,3 3,5 3,7 3,8 4,0 4,1
Spain Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Position Control 26,8 20,7 19,8 21,1 22,0 23,0 23,8 24,7
Spain Other Packaging Machinery Servo Motors 137,7 106,5 102,0 108,5 113,0 118,3 122,4 127,2
Spain Other Packaging Machinery Servo Drives 137,7 106,5 102,0 108,5 113,0 118,3 122,4 127,2
Spain Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Motors 23,0 17,8 17,0 18,1 18,8 19,7 20,4 21,2
Spain Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Drives 23,0 17,8 17,0 18,1 18,8 19,7 20,4 21,2
Spain Other Packaging Machinery Position Control 137,7 106,5 102,0 108,5 113,0 118,3 122,4 127,2
Sweden Bottling Line Machinery Servo Motors 29,6 19,1 21,0 23,0 24,3 25,2 26,1 26,8
Sweden Bottling Line Machinery Servo Drives 29,6 19,1 21,0 23,0 24,3 25,2 26,1 26,8
Sweden Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Motors 4,9 3,2 3,5 3,8 4,0 4,2 4,3 4,5
Sweden Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Drives 4,9 3,2 3,5 3,8 4,0 4,2 4,3 4,5
Sweden Bottling Line Machinery Position Control 29,6 19,1 21,0 23,0 24,3 25,2 26,1 26,8
Sweden Cartoning Machinery Servo Motors 82,4 53,3 58,4 64,2 67,7 70,2 72,7 74,7
Sweden Cartoning Machinery Servo Drives 82,4 53,3 58,4 64,2 67,7 70,2 72,7 74,7
Sweden Cartoning Machinery Stepper Motors 13,7 8,9 9,7 10,7 11,3 11,7 12,1 12,5
Sweden Cartoning Machinery Stepper Drives 13,7 8,9 9,7 10,7 11,3 11,7 12,1 12,5
Sweden Cartoning Machinery Position Control 82,4 53,3 58,4 64,2 67,7 70,2 72,7 74,7
Sweden Closing Machinery Servo Motors 84,6 54,8 60,0 65,9 69,5 72,1 74,6 76,7
Sweden Closing Machinery Servo Drives 84,6 54,8 60,0 65,9 69,5 72,1 74,6 76,7
Sweden Closing Machinery Stepper Motors 14,1 9,1 10,0 11,0 11,6 12,0 12,4 12,8
Sweden Closing Machinery Stepper Drives 14,1 9,1 10,0 11,0 11,6 12,0 12,4 12,8
Sweden Closing Machinery Position Control 84,6 54,8 60,0 65,9 69,5 72,1 74,6 76,7
Sweden Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Motors 57,1 36,9 40,4 44,4 46,9 48,6 50,3 51,7
Sweden Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Drives 57,1 36,9 40,4 44,4 46,9 48,6 50,3 51,7
Page 108
Attachment 5 (11)
Revenues for sub-components
Revenues in k€
Genuine Revenues Predicted revenues 11/2011
Country sector 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sweden Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Motors 9,5 6,2 6,7 7,4 7,8 8,1 8,4 8,6
Sweden Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Drives 9,5 6,2 6,7 7,4 7,8 8,1 8,4 8,6
Sweden Filling & Dosing Machinery Position Control 57,1 36,9 40,4 44,4 46,9 48,6 50,3 51,7
Sweden Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Motors 140,5 90,9 99,5 109,3 115,4 119,7 123,9 127,3
Sweden Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Drives 140,5 90,9 99,5 109,3 115,4 119,7 123,9 127,3
Sweden Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Motors 23,4 15,1 16,6 18,2 19,2 19,9 20,6 21,2
Sweden Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Drives 23,4 15,1 16,6 18,2 19,2 19,9 20,6 21,2
Sweden Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Position Control 140,5 90,9 99,5 109,3 115,4 119,7 123,9 127,3
Sweden Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Motors 51,5 33,3 36,5 40,1 42,3 43,9 45,4 46,7
Sweden Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Drives 51,5 33,3 36,5 40,1 42,3 43,9 45,4 46,7
Sweden Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Motors 8,6 5,6 6,1 6,7 7,1 7,3 7,6 7,8
Sweden Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Drives 8,6 5,6 6,1 6,7 7,1 7,3 7,6 7,8
Sweden Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Position Control 51,5 33,3 36,5 40,1 42,3 43,9 45,4 46,7
Sweden Palletising Machinery Servo Motors 4,7 3,0 3,3 3,6 3,8 4,0 4,1 4,2
Sweden Palletising Machinery Servo Drives 4,7 3,0 3,3 3,6 3,8 4,0 4,1 4,2
Sweden Palletising Machinery Stepper Motors 0,8 0,5 0,6 0,6 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,7
Sweden Palletising Machinery Stepper Drives 0,8 0,5 0,6 0,6 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,7
Sweden Palletising Machinery Position Control 4,7 3,0 3,3 3,6 3,8 4,0 4,1 4,2
Sweden Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Motors 29,1 18,8 20,6 22,7 23,9 24,8 25,7 26,4
Sweden Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Drives 29,1 18,8 20,6 22,7 23,9 24,8 25,7 26,4
Sweden Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Motors 4,9 3,1 3,4 3,8 4,0 4,1 4,3 4,4
Sweden Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Drives 4,9 3,1 3,4 3,8 4,0 4,1 4,3 4,4
Sweden Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Position Control 29,1 18,8 20,6 22,7 23,9 24,8 25,7 26,4
Sweden Other Packaging Machinery Servo Motors 132,6 85,8 94,0 103,2 108,9 113,0 117,0 120,2
Sweden Other Packaging Machinery Servo Drives 132,6 85,8 94,0 103,2 108,9 113,0 117,0 120,2
Sweden Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Motors 22,1 14,3 15,7 17,2 18,2 18,8 19,5 20,0
Sweden Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Drives 22,1 14,3 15,7 17,2 18,2 18,8 19,5 20,0
Sweden Other Packaging Machinery Position Control 132,6 85,8 94,0 103,2 108,9 113,0 117,0 120,2
Switzerland Bottling Line Machinery Servo Motors 30,2 25,9 28,0 29,8 31,1 32,6 33,4 34,4
Switzerland Bottling Line Machinery Servo Drives 30,2 25,9 28,0 29,8 31,1 32,6 33,4 34,4
Switzerland Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Motors 5,0 4,3 4,7 5,0 5,2 5,4 5,6 5,7
Switzerland Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Drives 5,0 4,3 4,7 5,0 5,2 5,4 5,6 5,7
Switzerland Bottling Line Machinery Position Control 30,2 25,9 28,0 29,8 31,1 32,6 33,4 34,4
Switzerland Cartoning Machinery Servo Motors 209,8 180,0 194,6 207,5 216,1 226,3 232,3 238,9
Switzerland Cartoning Machinery Servo Drives 209,8 180,0 194,6 207,5 216,1 226,3 232,3 238,9
Switzerland Cartoning Machinery Stepper Motors 35,0 30,0 32,4 34,6 36,0 37,7 38,7 39,8
Switzerland Cartoning Machinery Stepper Drives 35,0 30,0 32,4 34,6 36,0 37,7 38,7 39,8
Switzerland Cartoning Machinery Position Control 209,8 180,0 194,6 207,5 216,1 226,3 232,3 238,9
Switzerland Closing Machinery Servo Motors 41,6 35,7 38,6 41,2 42,9 44,9 46,1 47,4
Switzerland Closing Machinery Servo Drives 41,6 35,7 38,6 41,2 42,9 44,9 46,1 47,4
Switzerland Closing Machinery Stepper Motors 6,9 6,0 6,4 6,9 7,1 7,5 7,7 7,9
Switzerland Closing Machinery Stepper Drives 6,9 6,0 6,4 6,9 7,1 7,5 7,7 7,9
Switzerland Closing Machinery Position Control 41,6 35,7 38,6 41,2 42,9 44,9 46,1 47,4
Switzerland Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Motors 71,1 61,0 65,9 70,3 73,2 76,7 78,7 80,9
Switzerland Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Drives 71,1 61,0 65,9 70,3 73,2 76,7 78,7 80,9
Switzerland Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Motors 11,8 10,2 11,0 11,7 12,2 12,8 13,1 13,5
Switzerland Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Drives 11,8 10,2 11,0 11,7 12,2 12,8 13,1 13,5
Switzerland Filling & Dosing Machinery Position Control 71,1 61,0 65,9 70,3 73,2 76,7 78,7 80,9
Switzerland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Motors 187,4 160,8 173,9 185,4 193,1 202,2 207,5 213,4
Switzerland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Drives 187,4 160,8 173,9 185,4 193,1 202,2 207,5 213,4
Switzerland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Motors 31,2 26,8 29,0 30,9 32,2 33,7 34,6 35,6
Switzerland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Drives 31,2 26,8 29,0 30,9 32,2 33,7 34,6 35,6
Switzerland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Position Control 187,4 160,8 173,9 185,4 193,1 202,2 207,5 213,4
Switzerland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Motors 45,6 39,2 42,3 45,2 47,0 49,2 50,5 52,0
Switzerland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Drives 45,6 39,2 42,3 45,2 47,0 49,2 50,5 52,0
Switzerland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Motors 7,6 6,5 7,1 7,5 7,8 8,2 8,4 8,7
Switzerland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Drives 7,6 6,5 7,1 7,5 7,8 8,2 8,4 8,7
Switzerland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Position Control 45,6 39,2 42,3 45,2 47,0 49,2 50,5 52,0
Switzerland Palletising Machinery Servo Motors 10,4 8,9 9,6 10,3 10,7 11,2 11,5 11,8
Switzerland Palletising Machinery Servo Drives 10,4 8,9 9,6 10,3 10,7 11,2 11,5 11,8
Switzerland Palletising Machinery Stepper Motors 1,7 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,8 1,9 1,9 2,0
Switzerland Palletising Machinery Stepper Drives 1,7 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,8 1,9 1,9 2,0
Switzerland Palletising Machinery Position Control 10,4 8,9 9,6 10,3 10,7 11,2 11,5 11,8
Switzerland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Motors 22,6 19,4 20,9 22,3 23,2 24,3 25,0 25,7
Switzerland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Drives 22,6 19,4 20,9 22,3 23,2 24,3 25,0 25,7
Switzerland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Motors 3,8 3,2 3,5 3,7 3,9 4,1 4,2 4,3
Switzerland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Drives 3,8 3,2 3,5 3,7 3,9 4,1 4,2 4,3
Switzerland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Position Control 22,6 19,4 20,9 22,3 23,2 24,3 25,0 25,7
Switzerland Other Packaging Machinery Servo Motors 94,9 81,4 88,0 93,9 97,7 102,4 105,0 108,0
Switzerland Other Packaging Machinery Servo Drives 94,9 81,4 88,0 93,9 97,7 102,4 105,0 108,0
Page 109
Attachment 5 (12)
Revenues for sub-components
Revenues in k€
Genuine Revenues Predicted revenues 11/2011
Country sector 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Switzerland Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Motors 15,8 13,6 14,7 15,6 16,3 17,1 17,5 18,0
Switzerland Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Drives 15,8 13,6 14,7 15,6 16,3 17,1 17,5 18,0
Switzerland Other Packaging Machinery Position Control 94,9 81,4 88,0 93,9 97,7 102,4 105,0 108,0
Turkey Bottling Line Machinery Servo Motors 57,8 51,8 60,6 68,2 74,2 81,1 88,8 96,7
Turkey Bottling Line Machinery Servo Drives 57,8 51,8 60,6 68,2 74,2 81,1 88,8 96,7
Turkey Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Motors 9,6 8,6 10,1 11,4 12,4 13,5 14,8 16,1
Turkey Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Drives 9,6 8,6 10,1 11,4 12,4 13,5 14,8 16,1
Turkey Bottling Line Machinery Position Control 57,8 51,8 60,6 68,2 74,2 81,1 88,8 96,7
Turkey Cartoning Machinery Servo Motors 38,0 34,0 39,8 44,8 48,8 53,3 58,4 63,5
Turkey Cartoning Machinery Servo Drives 38,0 34,0 39,8 44,8 48,8 53,3 58,4 63,5
Turkey Cartoning Machinery Stepper Motors 6,3 5,7 6,6 7,5 8,1 8,9 9,7 10,6
Turkey Cartoning Machinery Stepper Drives 6,3 5,7 6,6 7,5 8,1 8,9 9,7 10,6
Turkey Cartoning Machinery Position Control 38,0 34,0 39,8 44,8 48,8 53,3 58,4 63,5
Turkey Closing Machinery Servo Motors 16,6 14,9 17,5 19,6 21,4 23,3 25,6 27,8
Turkey Closing Machinery Servo Drives 16,6 14,9 17,5 19,6 21,4 23,3 25,6 27,8
Turkey Closing Machinery Stepper Motors 2,8 2,5 2,9 3,3 3,6 3,9 4,3 4,6
Turkey Closing Machinery Stepper Drives 2,8 2,5 2,9 3,3 3,6 3,9 4,3 4,6
Turkey Closing Machinery Position Control 16,6 14,9 17,5 19,6 21,4 23,3 25,6 27,8
Turkey Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Motors 46,2 41,4 48,4 54,5 59,3 64,8 71,0 77,2
Turkey Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Drives 46,2 41,4 48,4 54,5 59,3 64,8 71,0 77,2
Turkey Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Motors 7,7 6,9 8,1 9,1 9,9 10,8 11,8 12,9
Turkey Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Drives 7,7 6,9 8,1 9,1 9,9 10,8 11,8 12,9
Turkey Filling & Dosing Machinery Position Control 46,2 41,4 48,4 54,5 59,3 64,8 71,0 77,2
Turkey Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Motors 232,8 208,5 244,1 274,6 299,0 326,5 357,8 389,4
Turkey Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Drives 232,8 208,5 244,1 274,6 299,0 326,5 357,8 389,4
Turkey Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Motors 38,8 34,7 40,7 45,8 49,8 54,4 59,6 64,9
Turkey Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Drives 38,8 34,7 40,7 45,8 49,8 54,4 59,6 64,9
Turkey Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Position Control 232,8 208,5 244,1 274,6 299,0 326,5 357,8 389,4
Turkey Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Motors 49,8 44,6 52,2 58,8 64,0 69,9 76,6 83,3
Turkey Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Drives 49,8 44,6 52,2 58,8 64,0 69,9 76,6 83,3
Turkey Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Motors 8,3 7,4 8,7 9,8 10,7 11,6 12,8 13,9
Turkey Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Drives 8,3 7,4 8,7 9,8 10,7 11,6 12,8 13,9
Turkey Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Position Control 49,8 44,6 52,2 58,8 64,0 69,9 76,6 83,3
Turkey Palletising Machinery Servo Motors 9,2 8,2 9,7 10,9 11,8 12,9 14,2 15,4
Turkey Palletising Machinery Servo Drives 9,2 8,2 9,7 10,9 11,8 12,9 14,2 15,4
Turkey Palletising Machinery Stepper Motors 1,5 1,4 1,6 1,8 2,0 2,2 2,4 2,6
Turkey Palletising Machinery Stepper Drives 1,5 1,4 1,6 1,8 2,0 2,2 2,4 2,6
Turkey Palletising Machinery Position Control 9,2 8,2 9,7 10,9 11,8 12,9 14,2 15,4
Turkey Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Motors 8,3 7,4 8,7 9,7 10,6 11,6 12,7 13,8
Turkey Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Drives 8,3 7,4 8,7 9,7 10,6 11,6 12,7 13,8
Turkey Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Motors 1,4 1,2 1,4 1,6 1,8 1,9 2,1 2,3
Turkey Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Drives 1,4 1,2 1,4 1,6 1,8 1,9 2,1 2,3
Turkey Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Position Control 8,3 7,4 8,7 9,7 10,6 11,6 12,7 13,8
Turkey Other Packaging Machinery Servo Motors 58,3 52,2 61,1 68,8 74,9 81,8 89,6 97,6
Turkey Other Packaging Machinery Servo Drives 58,3 52,2 61,1 68,8 74,9 81,8 89,6 97,6
Turkey Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Motors 9,7 8,7 10,2 11,5 12,5 13,6 14,9 16,3
Turkey Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Drives 9,7 8,7 10,2 11,5 12,5 13,6 14,9 16,3
Turkey Other Packaging Machinery Position Control 58,3 52,2 61,1 68,8 74,9 81,8 89,6 97,6
UK & Ireland Bottling Line Machinery Servo Motors 81,6 50,3 56,3 60,3 62,8 64,0 65,0 66,0
UK & Ireland Bottling Line Machinery Servo Drives 81,6 50,3 56,3 60,3 62,8 64,0 65,0 66,0
UK & Ireland Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Motors 13,6 8,4 9,4 10,0 10,5 10,7 10,8 11,0
UK & Ireland Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Drives 13,6 8,4 9,4 10,0 10,5 10,7 10,8 11,0
UK & Ireland Bottling Line Machinery Position Control 81,6 50,3 56,3 60,3 62,8 64,0 65,0 66,0
UK & Ireland Cartoning Machinery Servo Motors 276,4 170,3 190,8 204,3 212,9 217,0 220,1 223,5
UK & Ireland Cartoning Machinery Servo Drives 276,4 170,3 190,8 204,3 212,9 217,0 220,1 223,5
UK & Ireland Cartoning Machinery Stepper Motors 46,1 28,4 31,8 34,0 35,5 36,2 36,7 37,3
UK & Ireland Cartoning Machinery Stepper Drives 46,1 28,4 31,8 34,0 35,5 36,2 36,7 37,3
UK & Ireland Cartoning Machinery Position Control 276,4 170,3 190,8 204,3 212,9 217,0 220,1 223,5
UK & Ireland Closing Machinery Servo Motors 118,5 73,0 81,8 87,6 91,3 93,1 94,4 95,8
UK & Ireland Closing Machinery Servo Drives 118,5 73,0 81,8 87,6 91,3 93,1 94,4 95,8
UK & Ireland Closing Machinery Stepper Motors 19,8 12,2 13,6 14,6 15,2 15,5 15,7 16,0
UK & Ireland Closing Machinery Stepper Drives 19,8 12,2 13,6 14,6 15,2 15,5 15,7 16,0
UK & Ireland Closing Machinery Position Control 118,5 73,0 81,8 87,6 91,3 93,1 94,4 95,8
UK & Ireland Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Motors 98,4 60,6 67,9 72,7 75,8 77,2 78,3 79,5
UK & Ireland Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Drives 98,4 60,6 67,9 72,7 75,8 77,2 78,3 79,5
UK & Ireland Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Motors 16,4 10,1 11,3 12,1 12,6 12,9 13,1 13,3
UK & Ireland Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Drives 16,4 10,1 11,3 12,1 12,6 12,9 13,1 13,3
UK & Ireland Filling & Dosing Machinery Position Control 98,4 60,6 67,9 72,7 75,8 77,2 78,3 79,5
UK & Ireland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Motors 386,7 238,3 267,0 285,8 297,9 303,7 308,0 312,7
UK & Ireland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Drives 386,7 238,3 267,0 285,8 297,9 303,7 308,0 312,7
Page 110
Attachment 5 (13)
Revenues for sub-components
Revenues in k€
Genuine Revenues Predicted revenues 11/2011
Country sector 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
UK & Ireland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Motors 64,5 39,7 44,5 47,6 49,6 50,6 51,3 52,1
UK & Ireland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Drives 64,5 39,7 44,5 47,6 49,6 50,6 51,3 52,1
UK & Ireland Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Position Control 386,7 238,3 267,0 285,8 297,9 303,7 308,0 312,7
UK & Ireland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Motors 106,5 65,6 73,5 78,7 82,0 83,6 84,8 86,1
UK & Ireland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Drives 106,5 65,6 73,5 78,7 82,0 83,6 84,8 86,1
UK & Ireland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Motors 17,7 10,9 12,3 13,1 13,7 13,9 14,1 14,4
UK & Ireland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Drives 17,7 10,9 12,3 13,1 13,7 13,9 14,1 14,4
UK & Ireland Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Position Control 106,5 65,6 73,5 78,7 82,0 83,6 84,8 86,1
UK & Ireland Palletising Machinery Servo Motors 24,1 14,9 16,7 17,8 18,6 18,9 19,2 19,5
UK & Ireland Palletising Machinery Servo Drives 24,1 14,9 16,7 17,8 18,6 18,9 19,2 19,5
UK & Ireland Palletising Machinery Stepper Motors 4,0 2,5 2,8 3,0 3,1 3,2 3,2 3,3
UK & Ireland Palletising Machinery Stepper Drives 4,0 2,5 2,8 3,0 3,1 3,2 3,2 3,3
UK & Ireland Palletising Machinery Position Control 24,1 14,9 16,7 17,8 18,6 18,9 19,2 19,5
UK & Ireland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Motors 46,6 28,7 32,2 34,5 35,9 36,6 37,1 37,7
UK & Ireland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Drives 46,6 28,7 32,2 34,5 35,9 36,6 37,1 37,7
UK & Ireland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Motors 7,8 4,8 5,4 5,7 6,0 6,1 6,2 6,3
UK & Ireland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Drives 7,8 4,8 5,4 5,7 6,0 6,1 6,2 6,3
UK & Ireland Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Position Control 46,6 28,7 32,2 34,5 35,9 36,6 37,1 37,7
UK & Ireland Other Packaging Machinery Servo Motors 193,4 119,2 133,5 142,9 148,9 151,8 154,0 156,4
UK & Ireland Other Packaging Machinery Servo Drives 193,4 119,2 133,5 142,9 148,9 151,8 154,0 156,4
UK & Ireland Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Motors 32,2 19,9 22,2 23,8 24,8 25,3 25,7 26,1
UK & Ireland Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Drives 32,2 19,9 22,2 23,8 24,8 25,3 25,7 26,1
UK & Ireland Other Packaging Machinery Position Control 193,4 119,2 133,5 142,9 148,9 151,8 154,0 156,4
Rest of Europe & CIS Bottling Line Machinery Servo Motors 76,8 67,3 73,4 80,2 85,8 90,7 95,0 99,2
Rest of Europe & CIS Bottling Line Machinery Servo Drives 76,8 67,3 73,4 80,2 85,8 90,7 95,0 99,2
Rest of Europe & CIS Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Motors 12,8 11,2 12,2 13,4 14,3 15,1 15,8 16,5
Rest of Europe & CIS Bottling Line Machinery Stepper Drives 12,8 11,2 12,2 13,4 14,3 15,1 15,8 16,5
Rest of Europe & CIS Bottling Line Machinery Position Control 76,8 67,3 73,4 80,2 85,8 90,7 95,0 99,2
Rest of Europe & CIS Cartoning Machinery Servo Motors 50,4 44,1 48,1 52,6 56,3 59,5 62,3 65,1
Rest of Europe & CIS Cartoning Machinery Servo Drives 50,4 44,1 48,1 52,6 56,3 59,5 62,3 65,1
Rest of Europe & CIS Cartoning Machinery Stepper Motors 8,4 7,4 8,0 8,8 9,4 9,9 10,4 10,8
Rest of Europe & CIS Cartoning Machinery Stepper Drives 8,4 7,4 8,0 8,8 9,4 9,9 10,4 10,8
Rest of Europe & CIS Cartoning Machinery Position Control 50,4 44,1 48,1 52,6 56,3 59,5 62,3 65,1
Rest of Europe & CIS Closing Machinery Servo Motors 86,6 75,9 82,7 90,4 96,7 102,3 107,1 111,9
Rest of Europe & CIS Closing Machinery Servo Drives 86,6 75,9 82,7 90,4 96,7 102,3 107,1 111,9
Rest of Europe & CIS Closing Machinery Stepper Motors 14,4 12,6 13,8 15,1 16,1 17,0 17,9 18,6
Rest of Europe & CIS Closing Machinery Stepper Drives 14,4 12,6 13,8 15,1 16,1 17,0 17,9 18,6
Rest of Europe & CIS Closing Machinery Position Control 86,6 75,9 82,7 90,4 96,7 102,3 107,1 111,9
Rest of Europe & CIS Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Motors 130,3 114,1 124,4 136,0 145,5 153,8 161,1 168,3
Rest of Europe & CIS Filling & Dosing Machinery Servo Drives 130,3 114,1 124,4 136,0 145,5 153,8 161,1 168,3
Rest of Europe & CIS Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Motors 21,7 19,0 20,7 22,7 24,2 25,6 26,9 28,0
Rest of Europe & CIS Filling & Dosing Machinery Stepper Drives 21,7 19,0 20,7 22,7 24,2 25,6 26,9 28,0
Rest of Europe & CIS Filling & Dosing Machinery Position Control 130,3 114,1 124,4 136,0 145,5 153,8 161,1 168,3
Rest of Europe & CIS Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Motors 247,2 216,5 236,1 258,2 276,1 291,9 305,7 319,3
Rest of Europe & CIS Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Servo Drives 247,2 216,5 236,1 258,2 276,1 291,9 305,7 319,3
Rest of Europe & CIS Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Motors 41,2 36,1 39,4 43,0 46,0 48,7 51,0 53,2
Rest of Europe & CIS Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Stepper Drives 41,2 36,1 39,4 43,0 46,0 48,7 51,0 53,2
Rest of Europe & CIS Form, Fill & Seal Machinery Position Control 247,2 216,5 236,1 258,2 276,1 291,9 305,7 319,3
Rest of Europe & CIS Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Motors 129,1 113,1 123,3 134,9 144,2 152,5 159,7 166,8
Rest of Europe & CIS Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Servo Drives 129,1 113,1 123,3 134,9 144,2 152,5 159,7 166,8
Rest of Europe & CIS Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Motors 21,5 18,9 20,6 22,5 24,0 25,4 26,6 27,8
Rest of Europe & CIS Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Stepper Drives 21,5 18,9 20,6 22,5 24,0 25,4 26,6 27,8
Rest of Europe & CIS Labelling, Decorating & Coding Machinery Position Control 129,1 113,1 123,3 134,9 144,2 152,5 159,7 166,8
Rest of Europe & CIS Palletising Machinery Servo Motors 12,2 10,7 11,7 12,8 13,6 14,4 15,1 15,8
Rest of Europe & CIS Palletising Machinery Servo Drives 12,2 10,7 11,7 12,8 13,6 14,4 15,1 15,8
Rest of Europe & CIS Palletising Machinery Stepper Motors 2,0 1,8 1,9 2,1 2,3 2,4 2,5 2,6
Rest of Europe & CIS Palletising Machinery Stepper Drives 2,0 1,8 1,9 2,1 2,3 2,4 2,5 2,6
Rest of Europe & CIS Palletising Machinery Position Control 12,2 10,7 11,7 12,8 13,6 14,4 15,1 15,8
Rest of Europe & CIS Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Motors 46,3 40,6 44,2 48,3 51,7 54,7 57,3 59,8
Rest of Europe & CIS Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Servo Drives 46,3 40,6 44,2 48,3 51,7 54,7 57,3 59,8
Rest of Europe & CIS Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Motors 7,7 6,8 7,4 8,1 8,6 9,1 9,5 10,0
Rest of Europe & CIS Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Stepper Drives 7,7 6,8 7,4 8,1 8,6 9,1 9,5 10,0
Rest of Europe & CIS Wrapping & Bundling Machinery Position Control 46,3 40,6 44,2 48,3 51,7 54,7 57,3 59,8
Rest of Europe & CIS Other Packaging Machinery Servo Motors 212,0 185,7 202,5 221,4 236,7 250,3 262,2 273,8
Rest of Europe & CIS Other Packaging Machinery Servo Drives 212,0 185,7 202,5 221,4 236,7 250,3 262,2 273,8
Rest of Europe & CIS Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Motors 35,3 30,9 33,7 36,9 39,5 41,7 43,7 45,6
Rest of Europe & CIS Other Packaging Machinery Stepper Drives 35,3 30,9 33,7 36,9 39,5 41,7 43,7 45,6
Rest of Europe & CIS Other Packaging Machinery Position Control 212,0 185,7 202,5 221,4 236,7 250,3 262,2 273,8
Page 111
Attachment 6 (1)
Respondent
Jukka Haapakoski, automation engineer
Elecster Ltd., Toijala, Finland
www.elecster.fi
Form, fill and seal machines, for pasteurized products
Existing concept in a packaging machine
1. The hierarchy of controlling products in existing machinery (PLC, servo drives, drives and
HMI) and the main suppliers?
A: Mitsubishi PLC controls the existing machine and we use compact and modular schemes in the
machines. A normal machine includes a HMI, few servo axes and few frequency converters. The
controlling data is fed from the PLC or from a separate motion controller. The HMI, motion
controller and servo drives are produced by Beijer and the frequency converter supplier is mainly
Vacon or Mitsubishi
2. The main reasons for selected suppliers?
A: The performance level with the present configuration is enough and it has been a reliable concept.
With a great volume we have been able to decrease the price level. One selection criteria is the
small size of the components.
3. What is/was the main reason for hierarchy selection?
A: The price-quality ratio is great and long experience with the present manufacturer saves time in the
programming and in the commissioning. At one time the main selection criteria was that Mitsubishi
was the only manufacturer providing fast counters and fast inputs integrated into the hardware.
The programming software was competitive in price and usability. We have an experience of
Siemens S5 and S7 logic controllers but Mitsubishi fits well into our scope.
4. What is the main fieldbus protocol in the existing machine?
A: A profibus fieldbus is used with few frequency converters but some of the drives are driven by
I/O:s. All components, like HMI’s, PLC’s and servo drives manufactured by Mitsubishi are linked
to each other via Ethernet. The target is to abandon profibus, but in the past it was the only
available fieldbus with wide range of desired features.
Page 112
Attachment 6 (2)
5. The range of average drive powers, minimum-maximum?
A: Servodrives starting from 200 W up to 400 W. Frequency converters less than 2,2 kW.
6. Most used supply voltage for the drives?
A: 1^230 and 3^400 VAC
7. Resistor or regenerative braking method?
A: Elecster has been manufacturing machines with both methods. In the past mainly the resistor
braking was used but today everything is done with units that can utilize the waste energy and feed
the extra energy back to the network.
8. Does your company or your customer have any targets regarding energy saving?
A: Motors that fulfill the IE-efficiency class. EU, EuP-directive.
9. Is the common DC supply method used in the existing machine?
A: Elecster has done also printing machines, which did have the solution where DC bus was linked.
There are several drives after one supply unit.
10. The average number of motor axis in a machine?
A: Each machine has 1-3 filling units and each unit includes one servo axis and 2-3 frequency
converters. The total amount can be up to 12 axes.
11. Main type of feedback from motor?
A: We have used resolvers in the printing machines and pulse encoders in the packaging lines.
12. Main tasks of the axes?
A: The servo drive is drawing the pouch to the desired length. Frequency converters are running the
sealing units, pumps, fans and film pulling rolls.
13. Are there any specialties in the controlling of the machine that other suppliers are unable to
provide?
A: The existing concept is rather old so there is no such a feature that drives over the other suppliers
or at least it is not an issue that a feature exists that cannot be found elsewhere.
Page 113
Attachment 6 (3)
14. Are there any desired features that the present supplier is unable to provide?
A: The present frequency converter model does not support any kind of safety feature and we are not
able to create a remote access connection.
15. Anything else related to controlling and multi-axis solution?
A: The main controlling system has to be compatible with several types of data handling like that it
has be able to read temperature sensors and other messages that base on some kind of standard.
Page 114
Attachment 6 (4)
Machines of the future or desired features under exploration
1. The desired hierarchy of controlling products
A: A possible future configuration could be Panel-PC, PC or PLC and I/O has to able to decentralize.
2. The main reason for multi-axis controlling selection?
A: If the axes are synchronized, or if the solution is position controlled or CAM-based application the
feature has to be integrated into the drive or into the main controller. The integration is a great
feature because of it can be enabled by using a ready programmed macro and the same unit can be
used if the application is changed during the designing. Our goal is to reach 1ms accuracy in
repeatability which drives the program loop time as low as 0,1 ms.
3. What will be the main fieldbus protocol?
A: An Ethernet-based fieldbus which enables several features through the Internet. There are certain
desired characteristics like remote access to the devices, monitoring ability and the possibility to
send software packages by using the Ethernet connection.
4. The range of average drive powers, minimum-maximum?
A: Drive powers starts from 100 watts.
5. Supply voltage for the drives?
A: 380-500V 50/60 Hz L1, L2, L3, PE. A drive has to be suitable for different regions.
6. Is the common DC supply method a desired feature in the future? If yes, why?
A: No, the common DC with intermediate circuit connected to each other is not going to be in focus.
7. Desired feature for waste energy braking? Regenerative supply units?
A: Regenerative drive units to feed the waste energy back to the network.
8. The importance of energy saving in machine design?
A: EU, EuP-directive and IE efficiency class in motors. It will be under same focus as it is nowadays
and the customers have not demanded any specialties according to the energy saving issue.
Page 115
Attachment 6 (5)
9. The average number of motor axis in a machine?
A: The maximum amount of axes per machine can be 16. Some of the used axes are going to be very
simple from the controlling point of view. These simple applications can be pumps, fans and
conveyors.
10. Main type of feedback from motor?
A: Absolute multi-turn encoder.
11. Main tasks of the axis?
A: In addition to the existing axes the sealing is planned to perform with a linear motor. The linear
motor has to be very accurate and fast in the positioning and the movement ends with the torque
controlling to finish the sealing with very smooth surface. One filling unit includes 2 linear motors.
12. Desired safety features integrated into the drive?
A: A normal emergency stop has to be possible to wire straight to the drive from the safety relay.
According to the standard EN415-3 it is required that a packaging machine has to stop during 1
second after the safety signal. It would make things easier if the connection could be straight to the
drive that includes integrated delay feature in input. Other desired feature could be that a safety-
stopped machine could understand to continue running until a certain task is finished. In general,
the safely limited speed would bring a huge help in the machine start-ups and stops when the speed
would be within the required level. Reduced speed in a machine decreases the needed safety level
and therefore some necessary maintenance functions, inspections and adjustments could be
adjusted during the machine is running.
13. Programming language and method?
A: Desired programming language could be IEC 1131
14. Are there any other desired features such as remote controlling etc.
A: One common control panel for each motor controller with an integrated feature that the software
can be accessed from one point. Future drives have to be equipped with a plug-in and plug-out type
memory unit for the software storing.
15. Specific features of the multi-axis controller?
A: Electrical axes applications in drives and in PLC, virtual axis application with master-follower
feature. Other desired control methods could be; CAM, position controlling and speed & torque
controlling.
Page 116
Attachment 7 (1)
Respondent
Automation engineer
Italy
Flow packaging
Existing concept in a packaging machine
1. The hierarchy of controlling products in existing machinery (PLC, servo drives, drives and
HMI) and the main suppliers.
A: The motion control is centralized in the PLC, the drives are just muscles, the main supplier for PLC
and servo is ABB
2. The main reasons for selected suppliers?
A: The ABB solution is very competitive in price and performance are comparable with the top
players
3. What is/was the main reason for hierarchy selection?
A: EtherCat allow to centralize the logic in the PLC having a very fast communication with many
drives
4. What is the main fieldbus protocol in the existing machine?
A: They have two solutions; one cheap with analog control and one flexible and configurable with
EtherCAt
5. The range of average drive powers, minimum-maximum?
A: from 1,4 Nm to 12 Nm?
6. Supply voltage for the drives?
A: 3x220V
7. Resistor or regenerative braking method?
A: resistor
8. Does your company or your customer have any targets regarding energy saving?
A: no
Page 117
Attachment 7 (2)
9. Is the common DC supply method used in the existing machine?
A: no
10. The average number of motor axis in a machine?
A: The version cheap one is 3 axis, the version configurable can be up to 8 axis
11. Main type of feedback from motor?
A: Serial encoder SSI
12. Main tasks of the axes?
A: The 3 main functions are: drive for In feed, End sealing and Tension control.
13. Are there any specialties in the controlling of the machine that other suppliers are unable to
provide?
A: No
14. Are there any desired features that the present supplier is unable to provide?
A: PTC control in the PLC
15. Anything else related to controlling and multi-axis solution?
A: no
Page 118
Attachment 7 (3)
Machines of the future or wanted features under exploration
1. The desired hierarchy of controlling products
A: Centralized in the PLC is still the best solution
2. The main reason for multi-axis controlling selection?
A: In case of standard machine dimension and price, it is a serious problem as regards flexibility
3. What will be the main fieldbus protocol in a machine?
A: EtherCAT
4. The range of average drive powers, minimum-maximum?
A: the same as today
5. Supply voltage for the drives?
A: 3x400V
6. Is the common DC supply method a desired feature in the future? If yes, why?
A: in the standard machine not, in some special application help to reduce energy waste in
temperature
7. Desired feature for waste energy braking? Regenerative supply units?
A:
8. The importance of energy saving in machine design?
A: not so much
9. The average number of motor axis in a machine?
A:
10. Main type of feedback from motor?
A: serial single or multiturn
11. Main tasks of the axes?
A:
Page 119
Attachment 7 (4)
12. Desired safety features integrated into the drive?
A: STO is an essential safety feature
13. Programming language and method?
A: text structured Codesys
14. Are there any other desired features such as remote controlling etc.
A: no
15. Specific features to the multi-axis controller?
A:
Page 120
Attachment 8 (1)
Respondents
Juha Kiiskinen, automation manager, Henri Hiisilä production manager
Jomet Ltd
www.jomet.fi
Other packaging machinery
Existing concept in a packaging machine
1. The hierarchy of controlling products in existing machinery (PLC, servo drives, drives and
HMI) and the main suppliers.
A: Hierarchy: HMI -> Ethernet/IP –> PLC -> EtherCAT -> servo drives. All components are
supplied by Omron
2. The main reasons for selected suppliers?
A: Since the beginning we have used ready-made solution provided by Omron.
3. What is/was the main reason for hierarchy selection?
A: -
4. What is the main fieldbus protocol in the existing machine?
A: The Ethernet/IP is integrated to the HMI’s so it is the most natural way to use it and
communication from PLC to drives Omron has selected EtherCAT for motion control fieldbus
5. The range of average drive powers, minimum-maximum?
A: Servo drives starting from 200 W up to 2000 W. In some cases even up to 3 kW
6. Supply voltage for the drives?
A: 50 % 1^230 VAC and the remaining 50 % 3^400 VAC
7. Resistor or regenerative braking method?
A: The present supplier doesn’t provide regenerative drives - > braking resistors
Page 121
Attachment 8 (2)
8. Does your company or your customer have any targets regarding energy saving?
A: No, we don’t have any. We have got one inquiry including targets for energy saving but
during the process that was left out from the priority list.
9. Is the common DC supply method used in the existing machine?
A: Yes, we use DC busses for drive supplying.
10. The average number of motor axis in a machine?
A: It varies a lot because of the wide range of machines which are customized quite often. But the
minimum is one and the other extremity even up to 20 pcs per machine
11. Main type of feedback from motor?
A: We have used resolvers in the printing machines and normal pulse encoders in the packaging
lines.
12. Main tasks of the axes?
A: The axes are used in actuators and the motion types are usually linear and belt or chain
conveyors.
13. Are there any specialties in the controlling of the machine that other suppliers are unable to
provide?
A: Omron provides a solution where it is possible to use the servo motor without a gearbox. With
the specified structure the motor is better in inertia ratio. The specified structure means that
the diameter is bigger and the output shaft is very thick. The programming environment is very
simplified excluding all unnecessary libraries which could be surcharged by other suppliers.
The programming environment is totally Omron’s own script.
14. Are there any desired features that the present supplier is unable to provide?
A: Servo drives mechanical structure is not the best possible which occurs when the drives are
installed into the electrical cabinet. The brake controlling and NPN connections could be on
better level. Present supplier does not provide drives that could run two or more motors
simultaneously (Too many drive+motor packages). DC bus connection is not possible to use at
all and the connection of safety inputs is not good.
15. Anything else related to controlling and multi-axis solution?
Page 122
Attachment 8 (3)
Machines of the future or desired features under exploration
1. The desired hierarchy of controlling products
A: The present hierarchy has been very good with the existing components and we are used to
design machines with that.
2. The main reason for multi-axis controlling selection?
A: In practice we could use any sufficient solution for the multi-axis solution but there is no sense
to think other alternatives especially when the present package is enough.
3. What will be the main fieldbus protocol?
A: We will keep the same solution. The constant feature of TCP/IP socket /UDP communication
enables the connectivity almost everywhere.
4. The range of average drive powers, minimum-maximum?
A: No known changes in drive powers at least in the near future.
5. Supply voltage for the drives?
A: The concept remains the same, 230 VAC and 400 VAC
6. Is the common DC supply method a desired feature in the future? If yes, why?
A: Yes it is because we already use it. In the future we would like to have a common bus for all
related to drive main supply, auxiliary supply and safety wiring. It would enable easier
installation.
7. Desired feature for waste energy braking? Regenerative supply units?
A: There no such an option available if we consider the current solution.
8. The importance of energy saving in machine design?
A: The importance level can be said to be low
9. The average number of motor axis in a machine?
A: Servo axes are going to be in the same level but the amount of induction motors is going rise.
Page 123
Attachment 8 (4)
10. Main type of feedback from motor?
A: Absolute multi-turn encoder.
11. Main tasks of the axes?
A: No known changes.
12. Desired safety features integrated into the drive?
A: The existing solution supports: Safe Torque Off (STO), which seems to be enough in the
future, unless there are some new inventions that must be used in the machines. But at the
moment there is no need to expand the range.
13. Programming language and method?
A: Ladder and structured text programming languages seems to be fine for us.
14. Are there any other desired features such as remote controlling etc.
A: Remote controlling that can record (camera or equivalent) events which causes harm on the
line, reporting everything to the PLC. The remote access to the main system. In general
everything is interesting what could reduce extra flights to the sites.
15. Specific features of the multi-axis controller?
A:-
Page 124
Attachment 9 (1)
Respondent
Technical Operations Manager
Food Industry
Existing concept in a packaging machine
1. The hierarchy of electrical controlling products in existing machinery (PLC, servo drives,
drives and HMI) and the main suppliers.
A: We have many different configurations in different machines but a typical one for a aseptic filling
machine uses a main PLC with HMI to control IO, Point IO over Devicenet and/or Ethernet,6-10
servos or uses a secondary PLC over Ethernet for servo control over sercos optical interface.
2. The main reasons for selected suppliers?
A: Complete solution for the whole company with mass software licenses and unified programming
architecture, the Rockwell platform is flexible enough even for our biggest machines and provides
expert servo profile simulation and testing tools.
3. What is/was the main reason for hierarchy selection?
A: There is no certain history where the hierarchy is based
4. What is the main fieldbus protocol in the existing machine?
A: Devicenet and Ethernet
5. The range of average drive powers, minimum-maximum?
A: Usually the average powers are between 5 - 7,5kW
6. Supply voltage for the drives?
A: ±280VDC, 400VAC
7. Resistor or regenerative braking method?
A: Resistor and mechanical, so we use both, depending on the customer demand
Page 125
Attachment 9 (2)
8. Does your company or your customer have any targets regarding the energy saving?
A: No, our concept is not designed to be as green as possible
9. Is the common DC supply method used in the existing machine?
A: Yes
10. The average number of motor axis in a machine?
A: 4-16 which means that the amount is changing according to the machinery type
11. Main type of feedback from motor?
A: Absolute encoder
12. Main tasks of the axes?
A: many different, like form, seal, conveying etc.
13. Are there any specialties in the controlling of the machine that other suppliers are unable to
provide?
A: With the present concept, probably not.
14. Are there any desired features that the present supplier is unable to provide?
A: No, we are quite satisfied with the current concept
15. Anything else related to controlling and multi-axis solution?
A: -
Page 126
Attachment 9 (3)
Machines of the future or desired features under exploration
1. The desired hierarchy of controlling products
A: Already available and implemented. There is no need make changes until the customers are more
demanding and if the current scheme is unable to manage desired requirements.
2. The main reason for multi-axis controlling selection?
A: Speed and precision. Packaging machinery is very demanding in simultaneous movements with
high accuracy.
3. What will be the main fieldbus protocol in a machine?
A: Devicenet and ethernet
4. The range of average drive powers, minimum-maximum?
A: The trend seems to be that the powers are going stay at the same level 5,5 – 7,5 kW
5. Supply voltage for the drives?
A: 400VAC
6. Is the common DC supply method a desired feature in the future? If yes, why?
A: why not
7. Desired feature for waste energy braking? Regenerative supply units?
A: none
8. The importance of energy saving in machine design?
A: Don’t know
9. The average number of motor axis in a machine?
A: 4-16
10. Main type of feedback from motor?
A: Absolute encoder
11. Main tasks of the axes?
A: Many different
Page 127
Attachment 9 (4)
12. Desired safety features integrated into the drive?
A: What’s available, and of course according to the safety directives.
13. Programming language and method?
A: Rockwell, Structured text, ladder and SFC.
14. Are there any other desired features like remote controlling etc.
A:
15. Specific features of the multi-axis controller?
A:
Page 128
Attachment 10 (1)
Respondent
Hannu Kantonen, CEO
Ideal Automation Ltd., Forssa, Finland
www.idealautomation.fi
Several types, not a focused sector
Existing concept in a packaging machine
1. The hierarchy of controlling products in existing machinery (PLC, servo drives, drives and
HMI) and the main suppliers.
A: B&R automation centralized controlling is based on PanelPC with an integrated user interface.
Servo drives position controlling is adjustable through the fast integrated synchronous bus or by
using decentralized position control with servo drives. In decentralized mode the synchronization
between different axes is done automatically through the integrated bus.
2. The main reasons for selected suppliers?
A: The main reason is that the existing supplier offers a centralized controlling solution together being
able to deliver all needed components. The variety of available components is broad starting from
the simple PLC and continuing up to heavy-duty CNC controller. Our experience of the current
supplier is that the products are technically good.
3. What is or was the main reason for hierarchy selection?
A: The flexibility of the system, there is no need to do mapping for extra variables. Everything can be
done by using manufacturers programming software. The programming software includes program
editor, user interface builder and the parameter input for axis.
4. What is the main fieldbus protocol in the existing machine?
A: Ethernet Powerlink which is supported by the existing product manufacturer
Page 129
Attachment 10 (2)
5. The range of average drive powers, minimum-maximum?
A: 0,8 – 12 Nm, ( 0,4 – 4 kW)
6. Supply voltage for the drives?
A: 1^230 and 3^400 VAC
7. Resistor or regenerative braking method?
A: The loss energy is automatically fed to the servo drives via DC bus. The drives are rack-mounted
including common intermediate circuit. The loss energy is supplied into 24 V system. In some cases
an external braking resistor is connected to the system if the loss energy cannot be feeded into
main network or if the main network is lost.
8. Does your company or your customer have any targets regarding energy saving?
A: Not with the existing concept.
9. Is the common DC supply method used in the existing machine?
A: Yes it is because of the used product type B&R Acoposmulti
10. The average number of motor axis in a machine?
A: 3-12 pcs per machine, depenging on the machinery type.
11. Main type of feedback from motor?
A: The main type is absolute multiturn encoder with Endat 2.2 or 2.1 protocols. The price difference
compared to the other types is low.
12. Main tasks of the axes?
A: Linear motor controlling, raketrack controlling and other CAM-based synchronized axes
controlling
13. Are there any specialties in the controlling of the machine that other suppliers are unable to
provide?
A: A single project with one program code can include several hardware definitions. Different kind of
PLC products/hardware configurations can be used without changing the code. These PLC
products can be standard DIN mounted PLC’s, Box PC’s or Panel PC’s.
Page 130
Attachment 10 (3)
14. Are there any desired features that the present supplier is unable to provide?
A: The present supplier product range doesn’t cover a low cost servo motors and drives. The
incompatibility with other suppliers.
15. Anything else related to controlling and multi-axis solution?
A: In multi-axis solution the present B&R product type is an effective solution with several integrated
features. Programming and parameterizing is done over B&R own controller where a user can
control all the axes from one the point. B&R servo drives are not possible to run with any other
supplier motion controller but B&R motion controller is able to run other manufacturer’s drives.
Page 131
Attachment 10 (4)
Machine of the future or desired features under exploration
1. The desired hierarchy of controlling products
A: The existing hierarchy seems to be well working but the compatibility with other devices could be
better. There are certain encoders and sub devices that could be connected straight to the
controller.
2. The main reason for multi-axis controlling selection?
A: Our projects are very demanding in speeds and communication and we are satisfied with the
existing 200 us bus.
3. What is the main fieldbus protocol in existing machine?
A: The fieldbus has to be Ethernet-based when the system becomes easier to connect to other devices
and it is not tied into certain commercial expensive and closed protocol.
4. The range of average drive powers, minimum-maximum?
A: The range is difficult to define by prediction, but the trend shows that drive powers are going stay
at the same level
5. Supply voltage for the drives?
A: Mainly 400 VAC
6. Is the common DC supply method a desired feature in the future? If yes, why?
A: Yes
7. Desired feature for waste energy braking? Regenerative supply units?
A:
8. The importance of energy saving in machine design?
A: The importance is low. The packaging machinery is not handling big inertias.
9. The average number of motor axis in a machine?
A:
Page 132
Attachment 10 (5)
10. Main type of feedback from motor?
A: After moving into absolute multiturn encoders there has to happen something radical in the
feedback field before considering changing into another type.
11. Main tasks of the axes?
A: In the future many hydraulic and pneumatic axes are going to be replaced with electrical
equipment’s. The price level in servo motors and drives has become more attractive in the past
years and if a section that is done with traditional way where the repeatability is low, it is not an
issue to replace it with a servo drive and motor. Roughly it can be explained that all you need to do
in commissioning can be done just by using a laptop to setup everything to make the machine run.
12. Desired safety features integrated into the drive?
A: The existing solution supports: Safe Torque Off (STO), Safe Operation Stop (SOS), Safe Stop 1
(SS1), Safe stop 2 (SS2), Safely Limited Speed (SLS), Safe Maximum Speed (SMS), Safe Direction
(SDI), Safe Limited Increment (SLI), Safe Brake Control (SBC)
13. Programming language and method?
A: We are open to all IEC-based programming languages and in addition to that we would like to use
a text based programming language for motion controlling programming.
14. Are there any other desired features such as remote controlling etc.
A:
15. Specific features of the multi-axis controller?
A: