Mugendi AG, BPharm, MPharm (Clin Pharm)
Dec 19, 2015
Mugendi AG,
BPharm, MPharm (Clin Pharm)
Comparison of the effects of losartan and enalapril on renal function in adults with chronic
kidney disease at Kenyatta National Hospital
Introduction Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a growing
health concern
Its prevalence is increasing at a rate of 8% per year worldwide
The renin angiotensin aldosterone system is strongly implicated in the progression of kidney failure
Introduction Angiotensin II converting enzyme inhibitors
and angiotensin II receptor blockers inhibit this system
They control blood pressure and retard the progression to end stage renal failure
Enalapril and losartan are commonly used at the renal and diabetic clinics in Kenyatta National Hospital
Study problemPrevious studies evaluated the adequacy of blood
pressure control in patients with CKD and hypertension
They did not investigate the state of renal function in patients who were on ACE inhibitors or ARBs
No comparisons were done between ACEi and ARBs
Paucity of local and regional data regarding the use of these drugs and renal outcomes
Objectives Broad objective To compare the effects of enalapril and
losartan on renal function in adults with chronic kidney disease at KNH
Specific objectives1. To compare the incidence of doubling of
baseline serum creatinine concentrations in patients using enalapril and losartan based regimens
Objectives Specific objectives 2. To compare the change in the level of
proteinuria in patients using enalapril and losartan based regimens
3. To compare the change in estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients using enalapril and losartan based regimens
Methodology Ethical approval was granted by the KNH UoN ERC
Retrospective analytic cohort at the Kenyatta National Hospital from January 2006-December 2012
Data collection was done between June and August 2013
Two arm study – enalapril and losartan
Male and female patients 18 years of age or older with hypertension and diabetic nephropathy were recruited
Results – doubling of serum creatinine Patients on losartan had a higher risk of doubling
of serum creatinine (Adjusted HR=1.572; 95% CI: (1.015-2.434); p=0.043) than those on enalapril
A significant difference in survival probabilities between the two arms – losartan 18 months, enalapril 36 month (p=0.046)- was noted
P=0.046Log Rank Test
Figure 1: Kaplan –Meir survival probability curve to first doubling of serum creatinine
Results – changes in eGFR Significant differences in the means of the
estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) rates between the two arms were observed at months 3 (p=0.045) and month 6 (p=0.046) of follow up
Univariate analysis of variance revealed that increased length of therapy with either agent was protective (p=0.007)
Figure 4: Plot of the mean eGFR from baseline at different time points between the two arms.
Discussion Both drugs inhibit the renin angiotensin
aldosterone system
However, there is differential stimulation of the kallikrein kinin system (KKS)
KKS activation causes inhibition of the progression of diabetic nephropathy
Postulated to be the main reason for the difference of effect
Conclusion Patients on enalapril are less likely to
experience a doubling of baseline serum creatinine
Renal function is better preserved in patients on enalapril
Prolonged duration of therapy is also renoprotective
Recommendation Enalapril should be first line therapy in
hypertensive patients with diabetic nephropathy
RAAS blockers should be initiated as soon as possible after diagnosis
Larger studies- prospective cohort or randomised clinical studies- are required
Challenges 1. Incomplete records was the biggest
challenge