Top Banner
SOCIAL SECURITY CONCEPTS Rizaldy T. Capulong Deputy Chief Actuary & Vice President for Capital Markets
198
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: MSS Reviewer

SOCIAL SECURITY CONCEPTS

Rizaldy T. CapulongDeputy Chief Actuary & Vice President for Capital Markets

Page 2: MSS Reviewer

OUTLINE• PRINCIPLES OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAMS

• SOCIAL SECURITY CONCEPTS

• 5 PILLARS OF SOCIAL SECURITY PROTECTION• DEFINED CONTRIBUTIONS VS. DEFINED BENEFITS• TYPES OF MANDATORY SYSTEMS FOR RETIREMENT

INCOME• FINANCING A SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEME• ACTUARIAL VALUATION

Page 3: MSS Reviewer

DEFINITION OF SOCIAL SECURITY

• Social Security – any program of social protection established by legislation, or any mandatory arrangement, that provides individuals with a degree of income security when faced with the contingencies of old age, survivorship, incapacity, disability, unemployment, or rearing children; may offer access to curative or preventive medical care

Source: (ISSA/ILO)

Page 4: MSS Reviewer

OBJECTIVES OF SOCIAL SECURITY

To provide compensation for income loss To promote health and prevent illness To create living conditions that will satisfy

general needs of population and special needs of elderly, disabled and children

To redistribute income

Page 5: MSS Reviewer

TWO BASIC FUNCTIONS OF SOCIAL PROTECTION SYSTEM

A safety net function: ensures that each member of the society who is facing destitution is provided with a minimum level of cash income, health and social services which allow the member to lead a socially meaningful life;

An income maintenance function: permits economically active members of the society to build up entitlements to maintain decent standard of living during periods of contingencies

Page 6: MSS Reviewer

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAMS

Established by government law Generally provide individuals with cash

payments that replace at least part of the income loss

Principal methods of providing social security protection: social insurance employers liability scheme social assistance benefits funded from general revenues provident funds

Page 7: MSS Reviewer

METHODS OF PROVIDING SOCIAL SECURITY PROTECTION

• SOCIAL INSURANCE– financed by contributions– risks are shared and participation is compulsory– right to benefit is secured by contributions paid– contribution and benefit rates are related to

earnings– surplus funds that are not immediately

required are invested to earn additional income

Page 8: MSS Reviewer

METHODS OF PROVIDING SOCIAL SECURITY PROTECTION

• EMPLOYERS LIABILITY SCHEME– cover the risk of employment injury– employers directly responsible for the

provision of compensation and benefits– shortcomings:

• restricted protection of workers• modest level of cash payments• employers’ resistance to claims

– due to unsatisfactory features, many of these schemes have been converted into social insurance schemes

Page 9: MSS Reviewer

METHODS OF PROVIDING SOCIAL PROTECTION

• SOCIAL ASSISTANCE– based on the principle that individuals are entitled

to financial support from the state, should they be in need

– entire cost is met from state funds– benefits are paid as a legal right– also known as the “needs program”

Page 10: MSS Reviewer

METHODS OF PROVIDING SOCIAL PROTECTION

• BENEFITS FUNDED FROM GENERAL REVENUES– benefits payable to all qualified residents of

specific categories– no conditions exist concerning insurance or means

test– a period of residence is required

Page 11: MSS Reviewer

METHODS OF PROVIDING SOCIAL PROTECTION

• PROVIDENT FUNDS– employees and their employers pay regular

contributions into a central fund– contributions are credited to the individual

account of the member– upon contingency, total amount of credit in the

account is paid out in lump sum– some funds permit earlier partial withdrawals– no sharing of risks

Page 12: MSS Reviewer

IMPORTANCE OF SOCIAL INSURANCE

Promotes economic security for the individual and his family

Prevents individual from becoming a burden to relatives, friends and society

Attaining social security for everyone is one of the more important tasks of government

Page 13: MSS Reviewer

INDIVIDUAL EQUITY VERSUS SOCIAL ADEQUACY

• Individual Equity– a person who contributes to the system should

receive the level of benefit appropriate to his contributions and the risks involved

• Social Adequacy– benefits should be able to provide a certain

adequate standard of living to all contributors, downplaying the factors of number and amount of contribution

Page 14: MSS Reviewer

PRINCIPLES OF A SOCIAL INSURANCE SYSTEM

Must be generally compulsory Must be nearly universal in coverage Benefits should be related to earnings Provides only a minimum floor of income protection

against various risks covered Emphasizes the payment of benefits based on social

adequacy rather than individual equity

Page 15: MSS Reviewer

PRINCIPLES OF A SOCIAL INSURANCE SYSTEM

Benefits should replace lost earnings Benefits must be high enough to be effective and low

enough to encourage incentive and thrift There must be legal right to receive social insurance

benefits (right to benefit subject to contribution conditions)

Page 16: MSS Reviewer

PRINCIPLES OF A SOCIAL INSURANCE SYSTEM

Should embrace all contingencies in which an insured person is prevented from earning his living whether by inability to work or death

Should be financed by contributions, preferably with those who are protected and their employers jointly paying the bill

Self-employed persons should be insured against the contingencies of invalidity, old age and death under the same conditions as employed persons

Page 17: MSS Reviewer

INTERNATIONAL LABOR ORGANIZATION (ILO)

• tripartite organization (workers, employers and government)

• set up to bring government, employers and trade unions for united action in the cause of social justice and better living conditions everywhere

• important function is the adoption of International Labor Conference of Conventions and Recommendation which set International Labour Standards

Page 18: MSS Reviewer

ILO Convention No. 102• Multilateral agreement with regard to minimum

standards of social security• Nine (9) branches of social security

– Old-age– Survivor– Invalidity– Family allowances– Sickness– Maternity– Medical care– Unemployment– Employment-injury

Page 19: MSS Reviewer

ILO Convention No. 102

• Social Security System provides seven (7) out of nine (9) branches of social security– Old-age– Survivor– Disability– Sickness– Maternity– Medical Care– Employment-injury

Page 20: MSS Reviewer

ILO Convention No. 102

• Government Service Insurance System provides seven (7) out of nine (9) branches of social security– Old-age– Survivor– Disability– Sickness– Medical Care– Employment-injury– Unemployment

Page 21: MSS Reviewer

COMPARISON WITH PRIVATE INSURANCE

• Similarities– Based on risk transfer and the widespread pooling

of definite risks– Provide for specific and complete descriptions of all

conditions relating to coverage, benefits and financing

– Require precise mathematical calculations of benefit eligibility and amounts

Page 22: MSS Reviewer

COMPARISON WITH PRIVATE INSURANCE

• Similarities– Require contributions and the payment of premiums

sufficient to meet the estimated costs of the program

– Provide predetermined benefits not based upon demonstrated need

– Provide economic security

Page 23: MSS Reviewer

COMPARISON WITH PRIVATE INSURANCE

• Differences Social Insurance Private Insurance

1. Compulsory Voluntary

2. Minimum floor income Larger amounts available , protection depending on individual

desires and ability to pay

3.Emphasis on social Emphasis on individual adequacy equity

Page 24: MSS Reviewer

COMPARISON WITH PRIVATE INSURANCE

• Differences Social Insurance Private Insurance

4. Benefits prescribed by law Benefits established that can be changed by legal contract

5. Full funding not needed Must operate on fully because of compulsory funded basis without

contributions from new reliance on new entrants’ entrants and because the contributions

program is assumed to last indefinitely

Page 25: MSS Reviewer

COMPARISON WITH PRIVATE INSURANCE

• Differences Social Insurance Private Insurance

6. No underwriting Individual or group underwriting

Page 26: MSS Reviewer

COMPULSORY NATURE OF COVERAGE

• Makes it easier to protect the population against certain risks

• Both healthy and unhealthy people can be covered

Page 27: MSS Reviewer

CONSTRAINTS OF A VOLUNTARY COVERAGE

• Greater probability of adverse selection• More difficulty in achieving minimum economic

security• Those most in need of protection may seldom or

not participate (low income group) • Less coverage because some will be unwilling to

participate

Page 28: MSS Reviewer

ADVANTAGES OF COMPULSORY COVERAGE

• Greater coverage because both the low and high wage-earners are required to participate

• Both the socially poor and rich are protected against economic loss

• Provides certain advantages to lower income groups because the benefit formula is heavily weighted in their favor

• Makes the social insurance program truly viable

Page 29: MSS Reviewer

st 3rdPillar

Redistribute& income

replacement

1Pillar

DB or Notional DC, Earning-related

Contribution/Pay-as-you go/

Partially-funded

2ndPillar

DC, Benefits Equals

Cont + Earnings

Tax-Preferred Private savings /

Fully funded

Individual savings accountObjectives

Form

Financing

4thPillar

Informal intra-family Or inter-generational

sources

Financial and Other assets

Continuing protection

Tax preferred Private savings/

Fully Funded

DB or DC

Income Smoothing and enhanced savings

Mandatory Publicly Managed Pillar

Mandatory Privately Managed Pillar

Voluntary PrivatelyManaged Pillar

Voluntary Privately and Informally

Managed Pillar

THE FIVE PILLARS OF OLD AGE INCOME SECURITY

Demogrant or social pension

0Pillar

Means-tested, Minimum Benefits

Government

Mandatory Publicly Managed Pillar

Page 30: MSS Reviewer

30

DC VS DB*

• INVESTMENT RISK• BENEFIT ADEQUACY• PERCEIVED VALUE (EASE OF

UNDERSTANDING• EQUITY

*SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES: Course 5 Study Notes “Introduction to Retirement Income Security Systems” by Patricia Scahill & Steven McKay, 2002

Page 31: MSS Reviewer

31

INVESTMENT RISK

• DEFINED CONTRIBUTION

• Employee assumes investment risk

• DEFINED BENEFIT• Employer / gov’t

assumes investment risk

Page 32: MSS Reviewer

32

BENEFIT ADEQUACY

• DEFINED CONTRIBUTION• Adequate benefits

achieved if contribution level sufficient throughout working career & if investment performance is good

• DEFINED BENEFIT• Adequate benefits

achieved if benefit level is sufficient and employee has enough service, even if participation commences late

Page 33: MSS Reviewer

33

BENEFIT ADEQUACY

• DEFINED CONTRIBUTION• Benefit adequacy cannot be

achieved if individual starts contributing late

• Adequacy also jeopardized if employee earnings rise faster than the fund rate of return

• Main problem is limited capacity to improve past service benefits

• DEFINED BENEFIT• Benefits for employees who

change jobs frequently will likely be inadequate

• Great flexibility in improving past service benefits

Page 34: MSS Reviewer

34

BENEFIT ADEQUACY

• DEFINED CONTRIBUTION

• Benefit level directly affected by investment performance

• DEFINED BENEFIT• Investment

performance has indirect effect on benefit level in career earnings plans & for ad hoc pension increases

Page 35: MSS Reviewer

35

PERCEIVED VALUE (EASE OF UNDERSTANDING)

• DEFINED CONTRIBUTION

• Fairly easy to understand if employee statement is well designed

• DEFINED BENEFIT• Difficult for most

employees to understand until close to retirement, when they can relate the benefit to their expected income needs

Page 36: MSS Reviewer

36

PERCEIVED VALUE (EASE OF UNDERSTANDING)

• DEFINED CONTRIBUTION• High perceived value since

employee sees exactly what company is contributing, and the value of the accumulated contributions

• DEFINED BENEFIT• Value often perceived to

be low because it is not understood, because employees do not expect to stay until retirement, and because the value is low at younger ages

Page 37: MSS Reviewer

37

PERCEIVED VALUE (EASE OF UNDERSTANDING)

• DEFINED CONTRIBUTION• Harder to explain to those

near retirement who want to know how much they can afford to spend each year after retirement

• DEFINED BENEFIT• Greater need for good

communications

Page 38: MSS Reviewer

38

EQUITY

• DEFINED CONTRIBUTION

• Same value to any two employees with same earnings, regardless of age or gender (until they annuitize)

• DEFINED BENEFIT• Value of benefits

increases with age, especially if the employee stays until eligible for immediate retirement benefits

Page 39: MSS Reviewer

39

EQUITY

• DEFINED CONTRIBUTION• Same value for an

employee who quits before retirement as for an employee who stays until retirement

• DEFINED BENEFIT• Contributions are higher

for female employees because of longer life expectancy

• Benefits for early terminations can be subsidized by employer providing bigger benefits than pure actuarial equivalent

Page 40: MSS Reviewer

40

Pension funding around the worldMandatory schemes by type of financing

Partially-Funded

33%

Funded or mixed18% PAYG

49%

Number of Plans =115

Source: World Bank (Yvonne Sin)

Page 41: MSS Reviewer

41

EXAMPLES: DB & DCREGION DB DC

ASIA & PACIFIC

China, Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Taiwan

China, India, Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, Kazakhstan, Brunei, Fiji, Kiribati, Nepal

AMERICAS U.S., Brazil, Canada, Mexico, Argentina

Mexico, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Peru

AFRICAS Algeria, Benin, Egypt, Cameroon Kenya, Gambia, Nigeria, Swaziland, Uganda

EUROPE Germany, France, U.K., Italy, Russia, Spain, Netherlands, Switzerland, Sweden, Poland, Belgium, Norway, Austria

Russia, Switzerland, Sweden, Poland, Bulgaria, Croatia, Estonia, Latvia, Poland, Romania, Slovak Republic

Legend:2011 GDP: green (top 10); orange (top 11 to 20); blue (top 21 to 30); black (others)

Page 42: MSS Reviewer

42

TYPES OF MANDATORY SYSTEMS FOR RETIREMENT INCOME

• FLAT-RATE PENSION• EARNINGS-RELATED PENSION• MEANS-TESTED PENSION• FLAT-RATE UNIVERSAL PENSION• PROVIDENT FUNDS• OCCUPATIONAL RETIREMENT SCHEMES• INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT SCHEMES

Page 43: MSS Reviewer

43

FLAT-RATE PENSION

• A pension of uniform amount or one based on years of service or residence but independent of earnings

• Financed by payroll tax contributions from employees, employers, or both

Page 44: MSS Reviewer

44

EARNINGS-RELATED PENSION

• A pension based on earnings• Financed by payroll tax contributions from

employees, employers, or both

Page 45: MSS Reviewer

45

MEANS-TESTED PENSION

• A pension paid to eligible persons whose own or family income, assets , or both fall below designated levels

• Generally financed through government contributions, with no contributions from employers or employees

Page 46: MSS Reviewer

46

FLAT-RATE UNIVERSAL PENSION

• A pension of uniform amount normally based on residence but independent of earnings

• Generally financed through government contributions, with no contributions from employers or employees

Page 47: MSS Reviewer

47

PROVIDENT FUNDS

• Employee and employer contributions are set aside for each employee in publicly managed special funds.

• Benefits paid as a lump sum with accrued interest

Page 48: MSS Reviewer

48

OCCUPATIONAL RETIREMENT SCHEMES

• Employers required by law to provide private occupational retirement schemes financed by employer and, in some cases, employee contributions

• Benefits paid are lump-sum, annuity or pension

Page 49: MSS Reviewer

49

INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT SCHEMES

• Employees and, in some cases, employers must contribute a certain percentage of earnings to an individual account managed by a public or private fund manager chosen by the employee

• Accumulated capital in the individual account is used to purchase an annuity, make programmed withdrawals, or a combination of the two and may be paid as a lump sum

Page 50: MSS Reviewer

50

OVERVIEW

• SOCIAL SECURITY• BRANCHES OF SOCIAL SECURITY• TYPES OF RETIREMENT PROGRAMS• CONTRIBUTION/BENEFIT DESIGN BY BRANCH

– PENSIONS: OLD-AGE, DISABILITY, SURVIVORS– SICKNESS & MATERNITY– WORK INJURY– UNEMPLOYMENT– FAMILY ALLOWANCES

Page 51: MSS Reviewer

51

SOCIAL SECURITY

• PROGRAMS ESTABLISHED BY STATUTE THAT INSURE INDIVIDUALS AGAINST INTERRUPTION OR LOSS OF EARNING POWER AND FOR CERTAIN SPECIAL EXPENDITURES ARISING FROM MARRIAGE, BIRTH OR DEATH

• INCLUDES ALLOWANCES TO FAMILIES FOR THE SUPPORT OF CHILDREN

Page 52: MSS Reviewer

52

“PROTECTION” OF INSURED PERSON & DEPENDENTS

• THRU CASH PAYMENTS TO REPLACE AT LEAST A PORTION OF INCOME LOST AS A RESULT OF – OLD AGE– DISABILITY– DEATH– SICKNESS– MATERNITY– WORK INJURY– UNEMPLOYMENT

• THRU SERVICES PRIMARILY– HOSPITALIZATION– MEDICAL CARE– REHABILITATION

Page 53: MSS Reviewer

53

SOCIAL SECURITY

• INCOME MAINTENANCE PROGRAMS– PROVIDES CASH BENEFITS TO REPLACE LOST

INCOME• BENEFITS IN KIND

– FINANCE OR PROVIDE DIRECT SERVICES

Page 54: MSS Reviewer

54

3 APPROACHES TO INCOME MAINTENANCE PROGRAM COVERAGE

• EMPLOYMENT-RELATED– INSURED/DEPENDENTS/SURVIVORS CLAIM BENEFITS AS A MATTER OF

RIGHT– BENEFIT PROPORTIONATE TO SALARY OR YEARS OF EMPLOYMENT OR

SERVICE• UNIVERSAL

– INSURED/DEPENDENTS/SURVIVORS CLAIM BENEFITS AS A MATTER OF RIGHT

– FLAT BENEFITS• MEANS-TESTED

– BENEFITS BASED ON COMPARISON OF A PERSON’S INCOME OR RESOURCES AGAINST A STANDARD MEASURE

Page 55: MSS Reviewer

55

3 APPROACHES TO INCOME MAINTENANCE PROGRAM COVERAGE

• EXAMPLES– EARNINGS-RELATED: U.S., Brazil, Canada,

Argentina, Japan, South Korea, India, Denmark, Russia, Egypt, Libya

– UNIVERSAL: Bolivia, Canada, Brunei, Nepal, New Zealand, Denmark, Russia, Botswana, Mauritius, Hong Kong

– MEANS-TESTED: U.S., Brazil, Canada, Argentina, South Korea, India, New Zealand, Swaziland, Australia, Hong Kong

Page 56: MSS Reviewer

56

OTHER TYPES OF PROGRAMS

• PROGRAMS DELIVERED THRU FINANCIAL SERVICES PROVIDERS– MANDATORY INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT– MANDATORY OCCUPATIONAL PENSION– MANDATORY PRIVATE INSURANCE

• PROVIDENT FUNDS• EMPLOYER-LIABILITY SYSTEMS

Page 57: MSS Reviewer

57

TYPES OF MANDATORY SYSTEMS FOR RETIREMENT INCOME

• FLAT-RATE PENSION• EARNINGS-RELATED PENSION• MEANS-TESTED PENSION• FLAT-RATE UNIVERSAL PENSION• PROVIDENT FUNDS• OCCUPATIONAL RETIREMENT SCHEMES• INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT SCHEMES

Page 58: MSS Reviewer

58

EXAMPLES OF COUNTRIES WITH FLAT-RATE PENSION

• ALBANIA, CZECH REPUBLIC, ESTONIA, GERNSEY, IRELAND, ISLE OF MAN, JERSEY, LITHUANIA, LUXEMBOURG, MALTA, NETHERLANDS, NORWAY…

• ARMENIA, CHINA, GEORGIA, ISRAEL, JAPAN…• ANTIGUA, BERMUDA, JAMAICA, VENEZUELA• SEYCHELLES

Page 59: MSS Reviewer

59

EXAMPLES OF COUNTRIES WITH EARNINGS-RELATED PENSION

• ALBANIA, AUSTRIA, ANDORRA, BELARUS…• AZERBAIJAN, BAHRAIN, INDIA… • ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA, ARGENTINA, BAHAMAS,

BARBADOS, BELIZE…• ALGERIA, BENIN, BURKINA FASO…

Page 60: MSS Reviewer

60

EXAMPLES OF COUNTRIES WITH MEANS-TESTED PENSION

• AUSTRIA, BELARUS, BELGIUM, BULGARIA, CYPRUS, ESTONIA, FINLAND…

• ARMENIA, AUSTRALIA, AZERBAIJAN…• ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA, ARGENTINA, BAHAMAS,

BARBADOS, BELIZE...• LIBERIA

Page 61: MSS Reviewer

61

EXAMPLES OF COUNTRIES WITH FLAT-RATE UNIVERSAL PENSION

• DENMARK, RUSSIA• BRUNEI, NEPAL, NEW ZEALAND• BOLIVIA, CANADA• BOTSWANA, MAURITIUS

Page 62: MSS Reviewer

62

EXAMPLES OF COUNTRIES WITH PROVIDENT FUNDS

• BRUNEI, FIJI, INDIA, INDONESIA, KIRIBATI, NEPAL, MALAYSIA, SINGAPORE, SOLOMON ISLANDS, SRI LANKA, VANUATU, WESTERN SAMOA

• GAMBIA, KENYA, SWAZILAND, UGANDA

Page 63: MSS Reviewer

63

EXAMPLES OF COUNTRIES WITH OCCUPATIONAL RET. SCHEMES

• FRANCE, ICELAND, LIECHTENSTEIN, SWITZERLAND• AUSTRALIA, HONG KONG, PAPUA NEW GUINEA• BERMUDA

Page 64: MSS Reviewer

64

EXAMPLES OF COUNTRIES WITH INDIVIDUAL RET. SCHEMES

• BULGARIA, CROATIA, ESTONIA, HUNGARY, LATVIA, POLAND, ROMANIA, RUSSIA, SLOVAK REPUBLIC, SWEDEN

• CHINA, KAZAKHSTAN, BOLIVIA, CHILE, COLOMBIA, COSTA RICA, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC, EL SALVADOR, MEXICO, PANAMA, PERU, URUGUAY

• NIGERIA

Page 65: MSS Reviewer

65

SOURCES OF FUNDS

• PERCENTAGE OF COVERED WAGES OR SALARIES PAID BY THE WORKER

• PERCENTAGE OF COVERED PAYROLL PAID BY THE EMPLOYER

• GOVERNMENT CONTRIBUTION– GENERAL REVENUES– SPECIAL EARMARKED TAXES

Page 66: MSS Reviewer

66

PENSIONS

• OLD-AGE PENSION• DISABILITY PENSION• SURVIVORS PENSION• COVERAGE• SOURCES OF FUNDS• QUALIFYING CONDITIONS

Page 67: MSS Reviewer

67

SICKNESS & MATERNITY

• CASH SICKNESS BENEFITS• MEDICAL CARE BENEFITS• MATERNITY BENEFITS• COVERAGE• SOURCES OF FUNDS• QUALIFYING CONDITIONS

Page 68: MSS Reviewer

68

WORK INJURY

• COMPENSATION FOR WORK-CONNECTED INJURIES & OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESSES

• SHORT & LONG TERM BENEFITS• TYPES OF SYSTEMS

– SOCIAL INSURANCE– PRIVATE/SEMIPRIVATE ARRANGEMENTS

• COVERAGE, ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION

Page 69: MSS Reviewer

69

UNEMPLOYMENT

• COVERAGE• SOURCES OF FUNDS• QUALIFYING CONDITIONS

Page 70: MSS Reviewer

70

FAMILY ALLOWANCES

• TYPES OF SYSTEM & COVERAGE– UNIVERSAL– EMPLOYMENT-RELATED

• SOURCES OF FUNDS• ELIGIBILITY• BENEFITS• ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION

Page 71: MSS Reviewer

Cash Flow in a Typical Social Security Scheme

Contributions from employers

Contributions from insured persons

Penalty payments

Government subsidy

SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION

Benefit Payments

Administration Expenses

Investment Expenses

Investment income

Page 72: MSS Reviewer

FINANCIAL SYSTEMS: Pay-as-you-go vs. Full-funding

Pay-as-you-go scheme

Full-funding scheme??

SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION

Page 73: MSS Reviewer

PAY-AS-YOU-GO Financial System

– How does it work?

Collected are contributions only needed to fund current benefits, expenses and contingency fund

Contribution rates have to be increased periodically

No funds to investC

B

Page 74: MSS Reviewer

PAY-AS-YOU-GO Financial System

– How does it work?

No funds would be set aside in advance ahead of the times when benefits are payable

The benefits would be paid from current income of the scheme

Under this system, a social insurance scheme incurs steadily increasing annual benefit expenditures

Page 75: MSS Reviewer

– How does it work?

Given the pattern of rising annual expenditures in a pension scheme, the contribution rate would be low at the inception of the scheme and would increase annually for many years thereafter

PAY-AS-YOU-GO Financial System

Page 76: MSS Reviewer

– Where is this applicable?

PAY-AS-YOU-GO System

SHORT-TERM BENEFITS

Medical careSicknessMaternityUnemployment benefitsFuneral grants

PAY-AS-YOU-GO Financial System

Page 77: MSS Reviewer

– How does it work?

FULL FUNDING Financial System

– Collected are contributions needed to fund current and future benefits, expenses and contingency fund

– Stable contribution rate, lower in long term– Reserves are accumulated and invested,

ROI > Inflation– Guaranteed payment of

benefits during periods when benefits exceedcontributions

B

C

Page 78: MSS Reviewer

– How does it work?

Full funding of a social insurance scheme may be achieved by equating [1] the present value of estimated future expenditures on benefits and administration, to [2] a factor times the present value of estimated future insured earnings

Both of these elements are estimated for existing insured persons and for future new entrants

FULL FUNDING Financial System

Page 79: MSS Reviewer

– How does it work?

Solving [1] and [2] for the factor gives a level contribution rate (LCR) as a proportion of insured earnings, which would be adequate to meet the disbursements of the scheme for an indefinite period

This LCR is called the general average premium and the system of finance is referred to as the General Average Premium System

FULL FUNDING Financial System

Page 80: MSS Reviewer

– How about in social insurance pension schemes?

Since social security schemes are not subject to premature cessation, and since they normally have continuous flow of new entrants, it is not necessary to have a high level of funding to guarantee benefits

Full-funding is rarely used to finance social insurance pension schemes, other than being used principally to indicate the probable long-term cost of the pension scheme

FULL FUNDING Financial System

Page 81: MSS Reviewer

What Financial System Does A Social Insurance Pension Scheme Need?

– A financial system that has the following criteria: The contribution rate should not exceed the capacities of

insured persons, employers and the economy in general to support it

The reserves generated should not exceed the capacity of the country to effectively absorb the investments in a profitable manner

Contribution rates should remain relatively stable for extended periods of time, or any increases should be gradual

Page 82: MSS Reviewer

SCALED PREMIUM FINANCIAL SYSTEM: An Alternative System of Financing

The contribution rate is established so that, over a specified period of equilibrium (e.g., 5, 10 or 20 years), the contribution income and interest on the reserves of the scheme will be adequate to meet the expenditures on benefits and administration

A period of equilibrium is chosen which is of limited duration but is sufficiently long to guarantee a certain stability of the contribution rate

Page 83: MSS Reviewer

The contribution rate is determined in such a way that the expected receipts (contributions and investment income) of the scheme, during the period of equilibrium, will be equal to expected expenditures

The financial system does not provide for the use of the principal of the accumulated funds to cover current expenditure (only the interest on the accumulated funds is used)

SCALED PREMIUM FINANCIAL SYSTEM: An Alternative System of Financing

Page 84: MSS Reviewer

When current contributions plus investment income are no longer sufficient to cover expenditure, the premium is raised to the level required for a subsequent period of equilibrium

SCALED PREMIUM FINANCIAL SYSTEM: An Alternative System of Financing

Page 85: MSS Reviewer

25

20

15

10

5

GENERAL AVERAGE PREMIUM

SCALED PREMIUM (20-YR PERIOD OF

EQUILIBRIUM)

PAY-AS-YOU-GO (PAYG)

20 40 60 YEARS

CO

NT

RIB

UT

ION

RA

TE

As % of earnings

SCALED PREMIUM FINANCIAL SYSTEM: An Alternative System of Financing

Page 86: MSS Reviewer

Overview of Financing Schemes

A. Government-Financed Schemes B. Compulsory Contributory SchemesC. Voluntary Contributory Schemes

Page 87: MSS Reviewer

A. Government-Financed Schemes

• Financed by the government's general revenues

• Take the form of: 1. Public Assistance

• Provides assistance to those with less than a specified income and assets or wealth

• Objective is to relieve poverty rather than maintain income

Page 88: MSS Reviewer

A. Government-Financed Schemes

1. Public Assistance• Advantages

– Efficient since directs resources only to those who need it– Involves high degree of equity since it collects taxes according

to the ability to pay and redistributes them according to need

• Disadvantage: – Means tests are difficult to administer

Page 89: MSS Reviewer

A. Government-Financed Schemes

2. Universal Benefits Available to all who meet specific demographic, social

or health criteria, regardless of the beneficiaries' financial situation

Advantage:– Relatively simple arrangement to administer

Disadvantage:– Expansive coverage makes for high total expenditure

Page 90: MSS Reviewer

B. Compulsory Contributory Schemes

• Financed by mandatory contributions by employer and/or employee

• Take the form of:1. Provident Funds

• Defined contribution• Employers and employees contribute a fixed proportion of the

latter's wages to an individual account established for each employee

Page 91: MSS Reviewer

B. Compulsory Contributory Schemes

1. Provident Funds • Accumulated funds are available for withdrawal upon

reaching the statutory withdrawal age • Advantage:

– Encourages saving

• Disadvantages:– Sensitive to inflation– No mechanism for ensuring that everyone receives adequate

benefits – Makes no allowance for the different life spans of different

people

Page 92: MSS Reviewer

B. Compulsory Contributory Schemes

2. Social Insurance • Defined benefit• Pools contributions during the working life and pays

benefits when the contingency occurs• Usually funded on a pay-as-you-go (PAYG) basis • Advantages:

– Offers assistance as a matter of right– stabilizes income over the lifecycle

Page 93: MSS Reviewer

B. Compulsory Contributory Schemes

2. Social Insurance • Disadvantage:

– Contribution rates are often too low for the prescribed benefits. As a result, governments are brought into covering the scheme's deficits, thereby eroding its insurance character

3. Employer Liability Scheme• Require employers, when liable, to provide specified

payments or services directly to their employees

Page 94: MSS Reviewer

C. Voluntary Contributory Schemes

• Financed by voluntary contributions by employer and/or employee

• Advantage:– Provides additional pension benefits to those on higher income

• Disadvantage:– Expensive– Highly regressive because the higher one's income, the more one

can benefit from it

Page 95: MSS Reviewer

Overview of Financing Schemes• None of the schemes are by itself adequate to perform saving,

redistribution, and insurance functions• Because of this, the World Bank proposed establishment of

three tiers ('pillars') of schemes:1. A state-financed universal minimum pension; 2. A mandatory and fully-funded defined benefits scheme funded from

contributions and in which benefits will be closely tied to contribution;3. Voluntary individual and company saving and pension plans.

• All types of social security financing have their strength and weaknesses

• The challenge is to find the system which best matches national conditions, economic circumstances, demographic situation, needs, and preferences.

Page 96: MSS Reviewer

Financing Systems inSoutheast Asia

• Indonesia

Contribution Rate as a Percentage of Total Insurable Earnings

IP: Insured Person; SE:Self-Employed; ER:Employer; Gov: Government; Admin: Administrative Organization

Source: Social Security Programs Throughout the World: Asia and the Pacific, 2008

Old Age, Disability, and Survivors Sickness and Maternity Work Injury

Provident Fund IP : 2% SE : N/A ER : 3.7% Gov : NoneSocial Insurance System IP : None SE : 0.3% ER : None Admin: Employees Social Security System (Jamsostek)

Social Insurance System IP : None SE : N/A ER : 3-6% Gov : None Admin: Employees Social Security System (Jamsostek)

Social Insurance System IP : None SE : N/A ER : 0.24-1.74% Gov : None Admin: Employees Social Security System (Jamsostek)

Page 97: MSS Reviewer

Financing Systems in Southeast Asia

• PhilippinesOld Age, Disability, and

Survivors Sickness and Maternity Work Injury

Social Insurance System IP : 3.33% SE : 10.4% ER : 7.07% Gov : Any Deficit Admin: Social Security System

Social Insurance System 1. Cash Sickness & Maternity Funding Included in Old Age, Disability and Survivors Admin : Social Security System2. Medical Benefits IP : 1.25% SE : PhP100 ER : 1.25% Gov : Covers no or Low-Income persons; Any deficit Admin: Philippine Health Insurance Corporation

Social Insurance System IP : None SE : N/A ER : Php 10-0.2% Gov : Any deficit Admin: Social Security System, Employees’ Compensation Commission

Contribution Rate as a Percentage of Total Insurable Earnings

IP: Insured Person; SE:Self-Employed; ER:Employer; Gov: Government; Admin: Administrative Organization

Source: Social Security Programs Throughout the World: Asia and the Pacific, 2008

Page 98: MSS Reviewer

• Vietnam

Contribution Rate as a Percentage of Total Insurable Earnings

IP: Insured Person; SE:Self-Employed; ER:Employer; Gov: Government; Admin: Administrative Organization

Source: Social Security Programs Throughout the World: Asia and the Pacific, 2008

Financing Systems in Southeast Asia

Old Age, Disability, and Survivors Sickness and MaternitySocial Insurance System IP : 5% SE : N/A ER : 11% Gov : Subsidies as needed; Total cost of pensions for persons who retired before 1995 Admin: Vietnam Social Security

Social Insurance System1. Cash Sickness & Maternity IP : None SE : Voluntary ER : 5% Gov : None2. Medical Benefits IP : 2% SE : Voluntary ER : 2% Gov : Administrative Cost; Cost for low-income personsAdmin: Vietnam Social Security Ministry of Health

Page 99: MSS Reviewer

• Vietnam

Financing Systems in Southeast Asia

Contribution Rate as a Percentage of Total Insurable Earnings

IP: Insured Person; SE:Self-Employed; ER:Employer; Gov: Government; Admin: Administrative Organization

Source: Social Security Programs Throughout the World: Asia and the Pacific, 2008

Work Injury Unemployment

Social Insurance System IP : None SE : N/A ER : Included in Scikness and Maternity Gov : None Admin: Vietnam Social Security

Social Insurance System IP : 1% SE : N/A ER : 1% Gov : 1% Admin: Vietnam Social Security

Page 100: MSS Reviewer

• Burma (Myanmar)

Contribution Rate as a Percentage of Total Insurable Earnings

IP: Insured Person; SE:Self-Employed; ER:Employer; Gov: Government; Admin: Administrative Organization

Source: Social Security Programs Throughout the World: Asia and the Pacific, 2008

Financing Systems in Southeast Asia

Sickness and Maternity Work InjurySocial Insurance System IP : 1.5% SE : N/A ER : 1.5% Gov : Subsidies as needed Admin: Social Security Board

Social Insurance System IP : None SE : N/A ER : 1% Gov : None Admin: Social Security Board

Page 101: MSS Reviewer

• Malaysia

Financing Systems in Southeast Asia

Old Age, Disability, and Survivors Sickness and Maternity Work Injury

Provident Fund IP : 11% SE : M$50-M$5,000 ER : 12% Gov : None Admin: Employees’ Provident FundSocial Insurance System IP : 0.5% SE : N/A ER : 0.5% Gov : None Admin: Social Security Organization

Provident Fund Medical only - Funding included in Old Age, Disability, and Survivors - 10% of the total insured person and employer provident fund contributions finance certain medical expenses

Social Insurance System IP : None SE : N/A ER : 1.25% Gov : None Admin: Social Security Organization

Contribution Rate as a Percentage of Total Insurable Earnings

IP: Insured Person; SE:Self-Employed; ER:Employer; Gov: Government; Admin: Administrative Organization

Source: Social Security Programs Throughout the World: Asia and the Pacific, 2008

Page 102: MSS Reviewer

• Singapore

Financing Systems in Southeast Asia

Old Age, Disability, and Survivors Sickness and Maternity Work Injury

Provident Fund IP : 0-20% SE : 2.17-8.5% ER : 0-14.5% Gov : None Admin: Central Provident Fund

Employer Liability ER : Total Cost Admin : Ministry of PowerProvident Fund Funding included in Old Age, Disability, and Survivors Gov : Subsidy under certain wards Admin : Central Provident FundSocial Assistance Gov : Total Cost Admin : Ministry of Health

Employer Liability involving Compulsory Insurance IP : None SE : N/A ER : Total Cost Gov : None Admin: Ministry of Manpower, Commissioner for Labor

Contribution Rate as a Percentage of Total Insurable Earnings

IP: Insured Person; SE:Self-Employed; ER:Employer; Gov: Government; Admin: Administrative Organization

Source: Social Security Programs Throughout the World: Asia and the Pacific, 2008

Page 103: MSS Reviewer

• Thailand

Financing Systems in Southeast Asia

Contribution Rate as a Percentage of Total Insurable Earnings

IP: Insured Person; SE:Self-Employed; ER:Employer; Gov: Government; Admin: Administrative Organization

Source: Social Security Programs Throughout the World: Asia and the Pacific, 2008

Old Age, Disability, and Survivors Sickness and Maternity Work Injury

Social Insurance System IP : 3% SE : 3,360 baht flat rate ER : 3% Gov : 1% Admin: Social Security Office

Social Insurance System IP : 1.5% SE : Included in Old Age, Disability, and Survivors ER : 1.5% Gov : 1.5% Admin: Social Security Office

Employer Liability System involving Compulsory Insurance with a Private Carrier IP : None SE : N/A ER : 0.2-1% Gov : None Admin: Social Security Office

Page 104: MSS Reviewer

• Thailand

Financing Systems in Southeast Asia

Contribution Rate as a Percentage of Total Insurable Earnings

IP: Insured Person; SE:Self-Employed; ER:Employer; Gov: Government; Admin: Administrative Organization

Source: Social Security Programs Throughout the World: Asia and the Pacific, 2008

Unemployment Family AllowancesSocial Insurance System IP : 0.5% SE : N/A ER : 0.5% Gov : 0.25% Admin: Social Security Office

Social Insurance System Funding included in old age, disability, and survivors Admin : Social Security Office

Page 105: MSS Reviewer

• Laos

Financing Systems in Southeast Asia

Contribution Rate as a Percentage of Total Insurable Earnings

IP: Insured Person; SE:Self-Employed; ER:Employer; Gov: Government; Admin: Administrative Organization

Source: Social Security Programs Throughout the World: Asia and the Pacific, 2008

Old Age, Disability, and Survivors Sickness and Maternity Work Injury

Social Insurance System IP : 4.5% SE : N/A ER : 5% Gov : Administrative Cost Admin: Social Security Organization

Social Insurance System Funding included in old age, disability, and survivors Admin : Social Security Organization

Social Insurance System Funding included in old age, disability, and survivors Admin : Social Security Organization

Page 106: MSS Reviewer

Economical and Social Challenges & Strengthening Financing Systems

• Facing the challenge of ageing societies– Increase employment and economic growth– Greater labor force participation of women – Extending coverage to untapped informal sectors– Raising the retirement age– Increasing efficiency in collection of contributions– Consider shifting from pay-as-you-go funding to pre-funding

Page 107: MSS Reviewer

Economical and Social Challenges & Strengthening Financing Systems

• Social Security and the Economic Crisis– Social security benefits should be strengthened, and be included in

respective economic stimulus packages, • To alleviate the risk of poverty immediately for those who lose

their jobs or are not able to work, and• Stabilize the demand for goods and services produced by those

who still have jobs.

Page 108: MSS Reviewer

Economical and Social Challenges & Strengthening Financing Systems

– Social safety nets should be strengthened in countries of limited social security coverage and with no unemployment benefits or other income support schemes

– Longer term solutions should be sought that would help to correct the fundamental inequities in the global economy and society.

– Sound financing. Schemes should be financed to ensure to the furthest extent possible their long-term financial viability and sustainability

Page 109: MSS Reviewer

• Recognized importance of actuarial advice in the operation of the SSS

• SSS Charter requires a valuation every 4 years or more frequently as may be necessary

The Actuarial Tradition

Page 110: MSS Reviewer

• To know about the present financial status of the fund and likely future financial development of a scheme;

• To assess the financial sustainability of a social security scheme in relation to benefit provisions and the financing arrangement of the scheme under present law; and

• To advise and recommend possible amendments to the scheme’s provisions and financial arrangements.

Why do we conduct a valuation?

Page 111: MSS Reviewer

• Investments• Member Loans• Benefit Administrations

Other Uses of Actuarial Studies

Page 112: MSS Reviewer

• 1962 Valuation• 30 June 1977 Valuation• 31 December 1977 Valuation• 1979 Valuation• 1983 Valuation• 1990 Valuation• 1995 Valuation• 1999 Valuation• 2003 Valuation• 2007 Valuation

10 Major SSS Actuarial Valuations

Page 113: MSS Reviewer

• Increase in pension amounts• Across-the-board pension increases• Minimum monthly pension• 13th month pension• Supplemental monthly pension for disability

pensioners

Other Less Formal Valuation Studies

Page 114: MSS Reviewer

• Changes in pension formula– retirement pension: 10x– death pension: 8x– disability pension: 9x– dependents pension

• Lowering of retirement ages• Increase in salary ceiling• Unemployment insurance

Other Less Formal Valuation Studies

Page 115: MSS Reviewer

• Data collection and analysis• Model building and adjustments• Selection of assumptions and indicators• Feeding of the model• Base run and results analysis• Sensitivity testing• Additional simulations• Writing of the report• Presentation of findings and recommendations

Actuarial Valuation Process

Page 116: MSS Reviewer

• Membership Distribution– sex, age, salary

• Pensioners and Dependents• Compliance/Delinquency Rate

(Unemployment)• Benefits (Pension Increase/ Salary Increase)

Factors Affecting Valuation

Page 117: MSS Reviewer

• Investment (Real Rate of Return/ ROI)• Operating Expenses

Factors Affecting Valuation

Page 118: MSS Reviewer

• Programs must be financially viable and sustainable over the long term

VIABILITY AS A PROGRAM CONSIDERATION

Page 119: MSS Reviewer

• Full Projection Method– Matches inflow and outflow projections on a year-

to-year basis– Estimates the life of the funds

VALUATION METHOD

Page 120: MSS Reviewer

• Optimistic • Realistic• Conservative

SCENARIOS

Page 121: MSS Reviewer

• General Population Projections and Vital Statistics– National demographic projections– World Population Prospects (prepared by the UN

Population council)– Other demographic studies performed by regional

or international development institutions

SOURCES OF STATISTICAL INFORMATION

Page 122: MSS Reviewer

• Economic and Labor Market Statistics– National economic development plans for the

short and medium-term macroeconomic frame (developed by IMF and other bodies responsible for planning and finances)

– Labor force statistics compiled from labor market surveys

– Wage statistics– Household surveys

SOURCES OF STATISTICAL INFORMATION

Page 123: MSS Reviewer

• Scheme-Specific Information– A computer system containing the database on

registered employers, individual insured persons and beneficiaries

– Departments in charge of:• Planning and technical studies• Legal concerns • Accounting and finance• Investment• Inspection

SOURCES OF STATISTICAL INFORMATION

Page 124: MSS Reviewer

• Scheme-Specific Information– Departments in charge of: (continued)

• Collection of contributions• Taxation• Delivery of benefits

– Decentralized social security offices in charge of contribution collection and benefit delivery

– Alternative delivery systems (i.e. post offices and banks)

SOURCES OF STATISTICAL INFORMATION

Page 125: MSS Reviewer

• Actuary must have a understanding of:Social insurance coverageContingencies coveredEligibility conditions for benefitsCalculation of benefit amountsSources of financingDefinition of insurable earningsRules governing the determination of contribution rateRules governing investments

LEGAL PROVISIONS OF THE SCHEME

Page 126: MSS Reviewer

General Population Data (historical and future)• Population by sex and age group• Fertility rates and sex ratio of newborns• Mortality rates• Immigration and emigration• Marriage rate by sex and age group

GENERAL DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC DATA

Page 127: MSS Reviewer

Labor force, employment and unemployment (historical and future)• Labor force participation rate• Employment, average number of people• Self-employment, average number of persons• Unemployment, average number of persons• Unemployment rates

GENERAL DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC DATA

Page 128: MSS Reviewer

Wages, interest rates, inflation, GDP• Total compensation in nominal values (historical)• Wage share of GDP (historical)• Average wages for the economy and by the

sectors• GDP by economic sectors• GDP deflators by sector• GDP by expenditure components

GENERAL DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC DATA

Page 129: MSS Reviewer

Wages, interest rates, inflation, GDP (continued)

• GDP expenditure deflators• Primary factor income distribution• Inflation and interest rates• Exchange rates• National budget

GENERAL DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC DATA

Page 130: MSS Reviewer

• Appraisal of the institution’s data maintenance system

• Database on the insured population– Number of insured persons at the valuation date– New entrants and re-entrants to the insured

population– Level of earnings– Past accumulated credits– Density of contribution payments

SCHEME SPECIFIC DATA

Page 131: MSS Reviewer

• Database on beneficiaries- Number of pensioners

- Sex and age distribution of pensioners receiving a pension as of the valuation date

SCHEME SPECIFIC DATA

Page 132: MSS Reviewer

• Database on beneficiaries- Amount of pensions

- Total benefit expenditure by year- Reconciliation of total benefit expenditure- Average pensions and average replacement rates- Historical development of average pensions by age and

by number of years since inception- Historical development of minimum benefits in relation

to inflation and wage developments in the economy

SCHEME SPECIFIC DATA

Page 133: MSS Reviewer

133

DESIGNING/ ADMINISTERING/ MANAGING SOCIAL SECURITY

Page 134: MSS Reviewer

134

MAIN POINTS

• Social security is very important to any country because of the economic security it provides to individuals, families and the nation.

• Social security can be provided through 5 pillars a combination of which can be optimized for a particular individual or country depending on the situation. No one pillar can satisfy all the social security needs of an individual or country all the time because of the advantages and disadvantages of each pillar.

Page 135: MSS Reviewer

135

MAIN POINTS

• In particular, retirement income is an important branch of social security that must be carefully planned as it takes a long time to fund and there are again several schemes which can be combined and several ways for costs to be shared among individual workers, employers and government.

Page 136: MSS Reviewer

136

MAIN POINTS• Sources of funds for social security schemes are contributions

from employers, workers and/or government as well as investment income depending on the method of financing.

• On the other hand, level of costs may be affected by demographic and economic factors, as well as the design and strictness of implementation of the program.

• There are several methods to choose from in financing social security programs namely, pay-as-you-go, partial funding, full funding and terminal funding.

Page 137: MSS Reviewer

137

MAIN POINTS• Social security schemes must follow basic investment criteria

of safety, yield and liquidity however other goals have resulted in poorer returns for publicly managed funds compared to privately managed funds.

• For partially or fully funded pension schemes, successful investments delay the need to increase the contribution rate as investment income can be used to pay for benefits in excess of contributions net of operating expenses.

Page 138: MSS Reviewer

138

SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAMS AROUND THE WORLD

• Designing social security benefits• Designing social security contributions• International standards: ILO Convention

102• Global trends & reforms

Page 139: MSS Reviewer

139

DESIGNING SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS

• QUALIFYING CONDITIONS• FORMULA FOR AMOUNT OF BENEFITS• MAINTENANCE OF VALUE OF BENEFITS

Page 140: MSS Reviewer

140

DESIGNING SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS

• QUALIFYING CONDITIONS– Occurrence of contingencies

• Exclusions– Intensity of contingencies– Number of years of contributions– Number of contributions

– Continuous contributions– Recent contributions– Number of previous claims– Duration of previous claims– Age– Relationship to member– Relevant period

Page 141: MSS Reviewer

141

DESIGNING SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS

• FORMULA FOR AMOUNT OF BENEFITS– Fixed amount– Depends on salary– Depends on length of service– Depends on both salary & length of service– Minimum & maximum– Supplementary benefits– Duration– Frequency

Page 142: MSS Reviewer

142

DESIGNING SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS

• MAINTENANCE OF VALUE OF BENEFITS– No increases– Ad hoc increases

• When

– Indexed to inflation• How often

Page 143: MSS Reviewer

143

HIGHLIGHTS OF BENEFIT DESIGN AROUND THE WORLD

• PILLAR OF SOCIAL SECURITY– 135 out of 169 SSPs around the world are social

insurance schemes while the other 33 are provident funds, non-contributory universal schemes or means tested schemes.

Page 144: MSS Reviewer

144

HIGHLIGHTS OF BENEFIT DESIGN AROUND THE WORLD

• RETIREMENT AGE– 170 out of 172 countries around the

world follow a mandatory retirement age, with 57 countries allowing early pension.

Page 145: MSS Reviewer

145

HIGHLIGHTS OF BENEFIT DESIGN AROUND THE WORLD

• RETIREMENT AGE– 94% of SSPs that have different retirement ages for

males and females require a retirement age of 60 years old or older

– 67% of SSPs have different retirement age for females, require a retirement age lower than 60 year old

– 63% of SSPs that have universal retirement age, require a retirement age at 60 years old or older

Page 146: MSS Reviewer

146

HIGHLIGHTS OF BENEFIT DESIGN AROUND THE WORLD

• RETIREMENT PENSION– At least 73 SSPs have an earnings-related

pension (Afghanistan, Canada, China, France, USA, Croatia, Equador, Greece, etc.) while 12 have a fixed pension (Bermuda, Estonia, Georgia, Guernsey, Jamaica, Jersey, Seychelles, etc.)

Page 147: MSS Reviewer

147

HIGHLIGHTS OF BENEFIT DESIGN AROUND THE WORLD

• MATERNITY BENEFIT– 104 SSPs base maternity benefits on wage– SSPs pay 30 (Tunisia & Cape Verde) to 300

(Slovenia) days of maternity benefits at the rate of 45% to 100% of daily wage

Page 148: MSS Reviewer

148

HIGHLIGHTS OF BENEFIT DESIGN AROUND THE WORLD

• FUNERAL BENEFIT– 55 countries do not have a funeral benefit

program– 57 countries do not require any contribution to

qualify for funeral benefits

Page 149: MSS Reviewer

149

DESIGNING SOCIAL SECURITY CONTRIBUTIONS

• LEVEL OR DEGREE OF PARTICIPATION• DISTRIBUTION OF FINANCING OR SHARING

AMOUNG SOURCES OF FUNDS• FORMULA FOR CONTRIBUTION AMOUNT• METHOD OF FIXING

Page 150: MSS Reviewer

150

LEVEL OR DEGREE OF PARTICIPATION

• Compulsory• Voluntary• Portable• Only when employed• Additional• Advance• Delayed

Page 151: MSS Reviewer

151

DISTRIBUTION OF FINANCING OR SHARING AMONG

SOURCES OF FUNDS• Worker only• Employer only• Government only• Worker and employer• Worker and government• Employer and government• Government, worker and employer

Page 152: MSS Reviewer

152

FORMULA FOR CONTRIBUTION AMOUNT

• Fixed• Depends on salary• Depends on nature of employment• Depends on risk assessment• Variability of contribution rate• Frequency• Duration• Age

Page 153: MSS Reviewer

153

METHOD OF FIXING

• Regressive / fixed amount• Flat contribution rate• Progressive• Maximum salary base• Minimum salary base• Schedule of changes in contribution rate• Schedule of changes in salary limits

Page 154: MSS Reviewer

154

HIGHLIGHTS OF CONTRIBUTION DESIGN AROUND THE WORLD

• Out of 161 SSPs, 121 SSPs are DB, 10 are Provident Funds/DC, and 30 are dual (both DB and DC)

• 50% of South American countries have dual (both DB and DC) SSPs, the highest proportion among all continents. In all other continents, majority of SSPs are DB.

Page 155: MSS Reviewer

155

HIGHLIGHTS OF CONTRIBUTION DESIGN AROUND THE WORLD

• In Europe 34 SSPs are DB, and 7 are dual (both DB and DC), which represents the highest percentage of DB in any continent.

• 138 SSPs require monthly contributions, 20 weekly, 3 quarterly

Page 156: MSS Reviewer

156

HIGHLIGHTS OF CONTRIBUTION DESIGN AROUND THE WORLD

• URUGUAY: Higher contribution rate for higher salary• JAPAN: Higher contribution rate for miners and seamen

[8.224% vs. 7.852%]• KUWAIT: Retirement age is in the process of being

increased to 55 and is now at 50• BENIN & PHILIPPINES: Voluntary DC for overseas workers• CAMEROON: Contribution rate level depends on the risk

assessment

Page 157: MSS Reviewer

157

International standards: ILO CONVENTION 102

• Cost of benefits + cost of administration shall be borne collectively by way of insurance contributions or taxation or both in a manner which avoids hardship to persons of small means and takes into account economic situation of the Member (State) and of the classes of persons covered

Page 158: MSS Reviewer

158

International standards: ILO CONVENTION 102

• Contributions– Maximum limit for the contribution of

employees as a class– Total insurance contributions by employees

protected shall not exceed 50% of total financial resources allocated to protection of employees and their wives and children (except family benefit and, if separately administered, employment injury)

Page 159: MSS Reviewer

159

International standards: ILO CONVENTION 102

• Benefits– Minimum level of benefits by contingency– Sickness 45%– Unemployment 45%– Maternity 45%

– Old age 40%– Invalidity 40%– Survivors 40%– Employment injury

• Survivor 40%• Disability 50%

Page 160: MSS Reviewer

160

INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS: ILO CONVENTIONS

• MINIMUM STANDARDS OF SOCIAL SECURITY (CONVENTION 102)– Minimum coverage

• INVALIDITY, OLD-AGE & SURVIVOR BENEFITS (CONVENTION 128)

• MEDICAL CARE & SICKNESS BENEFITS (CONVENTION 130)

Page 161: MSS Reviewer

161

GLOBAL TRENDS & REFORMS

• Old age crisis• Increasing contributions• Phase out of DB• Multi-pillar: DB + DC• Migration from developing to developed

countries• Diseases: AIDS in Africa

Page 162: MSS Reviewer

162

Percentage of population aged 65 years and over, 1950-2050

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

1950 1970 1990 2010 2030 2050

Japan Germany Sweden UK France US

Page 163: MSS Reviewer

163

GLOBAL OLD AGE CRISIS• Aging world

– 1990: 0.5-B or 9% of world population over 60– 2030: 1.4-B or 16% of world population over 60

• Developing countries aging faster than industrial countries– 100 years for Belgium to double over 60 population– 34 years for China, 22 years for Venezuela

• Double whammy on govt budget: health & pension• Poor management

– Zambia public provident fund lost 23% per year between 1981 & 1988, ½ contributions in 1988 used for administrative expenses

Page 164: MSS Reviewer

164

GLOBAL OLD AGE CRISIS

• High payroll taxes distort labor markets & reduce growth– Hungary payroll taxes at 33%, ¼ population are pensioners, effective

retirement age falls to 54• Government pensions in developing countries rarely fully indexed to

inflation– Venezuela real value of pensions fell 60% in 1980s

• High government spending on old age security reduces funds for other important public goods and services– In 1989, Austria’s pension fund cost 15% of GDP, old age benefits

accounted for 40% of public spending• Higher subsidies for earlier generation of workers than later

generation– In Canada, Netherlands, Sweden and U.S., workers retiring in first 30

years of public pension scheme receive large positive lifetime transfers but future retirees may get less

*WORLD BANK: “Averting the Old Age Crisis” by Estelle James, 1994

Page 165: MSS Reviewer

165

SOME DESIGN HIGHLIGHTS OF PARTICULAR SOCIAL SECURITY

PROGRAMS AROUND THE WORLD

Page 166: MSS Reviewer

166

Armenia

• Lower retirement age for workers in more hazardous work.

• Age 63.5 (men) or age 58 (women) with at least 25 years of covered employment; age 58.5 (men) or age 53.5 (women) with at least 20 years of covered employment in hazardous work.

Page 167: MSS Reviewer

167

Benin

• Special system for public-sector employees• Special system for informal economy workers.• Voluntary provident fund for citizens working

abroad.

Page 168: MSS Reviewer

168

Burundi

• Old-age pension: age 60 (age 55 if prematurely aged or age 45 if working under arduous conditions) with 15 years of insurance.

• Retirement is not necessary.

Page 169: MSS Reviewer

169

Fiji

• Provident Fund system• for its old-age benefits, a couple may elect to

receive a monthly pension 2/3 of 22% of total employee and employer contributions plus accumulated interest for as long as either spouse lives.

Page 170: MSS Reviewer

170

Georgia

• Declining unemployment benefits• unemployment benefits are paid for 6 months

at a decreasing rate of 14 lari a month for the 1st 2 months, 12 lari a month for the 3rd and 4th month and 11 lari a month for the 5th and 6th month .

Page 171: MSS Reviewer

171

Hong Kong

• Universal old-age pension and means tested social assistance system with mandatory occupational individual accounts (mandatory provident fund schemes). (the schemes are privately run)

Page 172: MSS Reviewer

172

Kuwait

• Old-age pension Basic scheme: Age 50 with 15 years of contributions; if below age 50, 20 years of contributions.

• The minimum retirement age of 45 years is to increase gradually to 55 by 2017.

Page 173: MSS Reviewer

173

Saudi Arabia

• Shorter qualifying period for maternity benefits.

• Employed at least 18 working days or 120 working hours a month for 3 consecutive months

Page 174: MSS Reviewer

174

Uruguay

• Dual social insurance and private insurance system.

• Contributions are split between the social insurance and private insurance programs according to earnings ceilings.

Page 175: MSS Reviewer

175

Japan

• A two-tiered social insurance system involving a flat-rate benefit for all residents under the national pension program and earnings-related benefits under the employees' pension insurance program or other employment-related program.

Page 176: MSS Reviewer

176

Jordan

• Employees over age 16 in private establishments with five workers or more; government and public-sector employees not covered under civil or military pension laws; employees of universities, municipalities, and village councils; and Jordanians working at diplomatic missions and for international organizations.

Page 177: MSS Reviewer

177

Palau

• Coverage: Gainfully occupied persons, including some categories of self-employed persons; coverage is optional for self-employed persons with no employees and gross earnings under U.S.$10,000 a year but more than U.S.$300 per quarter.

• Exclusions: Casual labor and self-employed persons with no employees and annual gross income of less than U.S.$300 per quarter.

Page 178: MSS Reviewer

178

Pakistan

• Higher disability pensions if person is living in Punjab and Sindh.

• Sickness benefit: 75% of earnings; 100% in cases of tuberculosis and cancer (50% in the North-West Frontier Province and in Balochistan). Benefit is payable after a 2-day waiting period for up to 121 days (365 days for tuberculosis and cancer) in a 1-year period.

Page 179: MSS Reviewer

179

Thailand• Old-age pension: 15% of the average wage of the last 60 months. If the

insured person has paid contributions for over 180 months, the rate of the average wage will increase by 1% for each 12-month period of contributions over 180 months.

• Old-age lump sum: A refund of the employee's contribution is paid in a lump sum if the insured person has less than 12 months of contributions. If the insured person has more than 12 months but less than 180 months of contributions, a lump-sum refund consisting of the employer's and the employee's contributions plus interest is paid.

Page 180: MSS Reviewer

180

Turkey

• Social support supplement: All retirees receive a monthly flat-rate supplement of 4,690,000 liras.

• Benefit adjustment: Pensions are adjusted periodically according to changes in prices and wages.

Page 181: MSS Reviewer

181

Bahamas

• Benefits include hospitalization, general and specialist care, medicines, and transportation.

Page 182: MSS Reviewer

182

Costa Rica

• Benefit adjustment: Benefits are adjusted twice a year, in January and July.

• The basic benefit is increased by 0.0835% of average earnings for each month of contributions above 240.

Page 183: MSS Reviewer

183

Cuba

• Tuberculosis benefit: 100% of earnings until cured.

• Free burial services are provided by the government for all residents

Page 184: MSS Reviewer

184

Haiti

• Old-age pension: Age 55 with 20 years of contributions.

• In 1999, maternity benefits were introduced. Coverage for maternity benefits is being extended gradually. Medical benefits are provided through a clinic to all residents in exchange for a small token payment. Medical benefits include pediatric, dental, ophthalmic, and gynecology care and services; preventative care; health education; and surgery.

Page 185: MSS Reviewer

185

Mexico

• Christmas bonus: One month's pension.• Benefit adjustment: Pensions are adjusted according

to changes in the minimum wage.• Remarriage settlement: If a widow remarries, she

receives a final lump-sum settlement equal to 3 years' pension.

Page 186: MSS Reviewer

186

Saint Vincent & the Grenadines

• Maternity grant: The woman or her husband meets the qualifying conditions for cash sickness benefit.

• Benefits include medical, surgical, and hospital treatment; medicines; appliances; and transportation.

Page 187: MSS Reviewer

187

USA

• Benefit adjustment: Benefits are adjusted annually for cost-of-living changes.

• Pension increment: An increment is provided for each month the insured delays retirement at the full retirement age, up to age 69. The increment amount depends on the year the insured person reached age 62. In 2003, the increment is 7.5% a year for those aged 62.

Page 188: MSS Reviewer

188

Ireland

• Blind person's pension (means-tested): Residents with low vision and of limited means, aged 18 or older.

• Adoptive benefit: 39 weeks of paid contributions in the 12-month period immediately before placement date of adoptive child, or a total of 39 weeks of paid contributions with 39 weeks paid or credited in last fiscal year (self-employed, 52 weeks paid contribution in either of the last 2 fiscal years).

Page 189: MSS Reviewer

189

MAIN POINTS

• A social security actuary must be knowledgeable about various options in designing benefits & contributions of a social security program & must know how to change the design of the program to suite or influence the behavior of the covered population & other stakeholders or to come up with a program that will be relevant to the member needs but at the same time affordable and sustainable.

Page 190: MSS Reviewer

190

MAIN POINTS

• In designing a social security program, an actuary must consider both international standards as set forth in the International Labor Organization Conventions on social security as well as international practice and experience so as not to repeat mistakes of other countries and to help insure the sustainability and relevance of the program. It is not necessarily the case that the most frequently used design is the least problematic.

Page 191: MSS Reviewer

Trends in Social Security

Number of Years Number of Countries % Distributionbelow 5 6 4.3%5 - 9.99 11 7.9%10 - 14.99 38 27.3%15 - 19.99 38 27.3%20 and up 46 33.1%Total 139 100.00%

Distribution of Social Security Programs Around the WorldBased on the Required Number of Years of Contribution

to Qualify for Retirement Pensions

Asia and the Pacific Africa Americas Europe

No. of Years No. of Countries % Dist’n No. of

Countries % Dist’n No. of Countries % Dist’n No. of

Countries % Dist’n

below 5 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 2.86% 5 13.51%5 - 9.99 3 10.00% 4 10.81% 0 0.00% 4 10.81%10 - 14.99 9 30.00% 11 29.73% 12 34.29% 6 16.22%15 - 19.99 8 26.67% 13 35.14% 9 25.71% 8 21.62%20 and up 10 33.33% 9 24.32% 13 37.14% 14 37.84%Total 30 100.00% 37 100.00% 35 100.00% 37 100.00%

Distribution of Social Security Programs Per RegionBased on the Required Number of Years of Contribution to

Qualify for Retirement Pensions

Page 192: MSS Reviewer

Trends in Social SecurityDistribution of Social Security Programs Around the World

Death Benefit as Percentage of Retirement Benefit

Asia and the Pacific Africa Americas Europe

Percentage No. of Countries % Dist’n No. of

Countries % Dist’n No. of Countries % Dist’n No. of

Countries % Dist’n

50% and below 10 38.5% 26 78.8% 18 52.9% 10 34.5%51% - 60% 5 19.2% 1 3.0% 4 11.8% 10 34.5%61% - 70% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 11.8% 4 13.8%71% - 80% 1 3.8% 3 9.1% 4 11.8% 3 10.3%81% - 90% 0 0.0% 1 3.0% 1 2.9% 1 3.4%91% - 100% 10 38.5% 2 6.1% 3 8.8% 1 3.4%Total 26 100.00% 33 100.00% 34 100.00% 29 100.00%

Percentage Number of Countries % Distribution50% and below 64 52.5%51% - 60% 20 16.4%61% - 70% 8 6.6%71% - 80% 11 9.0%81% - 90% 3 2.5%91% - 100% 16 13.1%Total 122 100.00%

Distribution of Social Security Programs Per RegionDeath Benefit as Percentage of Retirement Benefit

Page 193: MSS Reviewer

Trends in Social Security

Distribution of Social Security Programs Around the WorldMaximum Dependent’s Benefit as Percentage of Retirement Pension

≤20%20% < x ≤ 40%40% < x ≤ 60%60% < x ≤ 80%

80% < x ≤ 100%100% < x ≤ 120%120% < x ≤ 140%140% < x ≤ 160%160% < x ≤ 180%180% < x ≤ 200%

fixed amountno limit

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80Number of Countries

Bene

fit A

mou

nt L

imit

, x

Countries with Express Limit on Number of Dependents

Country Limit on Numberof Dependents

Country Limit on Number

of DependentsBahamas 5 Cyprus 2Guyana 3 India 2Burkina Faso 6 Israel 2Côte d’Ivoire 3 Jordan 3Senegal 3 Philippines 5Albania 6

Note: Dependents herein refers exclusively to children dependents.

Page 194: MSS Reviewer

Trends in Social Security

Region Male FemaleAfrica 59.16 58.33 Americas 62.10 60.65 Asia & the Pacific 59.25 57.32 Europe 63.94 62.06

Average Statutory Retirement Age by Region(Weighted, by Sex)

Region Insured Employer Total

Africa 4.77% 12.76% 17.54%

Americas 6.83% 10.10% 17.00%

Asia & the Pacific 6.85% 11.86% 18.21%

Europe 10.34% 20.55% 30.89%

World 7.19% 13.95% 20.99%

Average Contribution Rate by Region

Page 195: MSS Reviewer

Trends in Social Security

Distribution of Social Security Programs Per Region by Type of Scheme

Region Flat-rate Earnings-related

Means-tested

Flat-rate universal

Providentfunds

Occupational

retirement schemes

Individual Retirementschemes

Total

Africa 0 37 3 3 4 1 1 49Americas 4 34 19 2 0 1 11 71Asia & the Pacific 9 26 14 5 12 3 4

73Europe 16 39 25 2 0 4 10 96Total 29 136 61 12 16 9 26 289

Page 196: MSS Reviewer

Asia Country* Men Women Programmed Increase in Age Requirement

Armenia 63 61.5 Increasing gradually to 63 for women by 2011

Australia 65 63 Increasing gradually to 65 for women by 2014; both increasing gradually to 67 from 2017 to 2023

Israel 67 62 To be raised gradually to 67 for women by 2017

South Korea 60 60 To be raised gradually to 65 from 2011 to 2033

Kuwait 50 50 Increasing gradually to age 55 by 2020

Taiwan 60 60 Will increase to 61 in 2018, increasing gradually to 67 by 2027

Turkey 60 58 Beginning 2036, increasing gradually to 65 by 2046 (men) and 2048 (women)

*as of 2010

Trends in Social Security

Countries with Programmed Increase in Statutory Retirement Age

Page 197: MSS Reviewer

Americas Country** Men Women Programmed Increase in Age Requirement

US 66 66 Increasing gradually to 67 by 2027** as of 2011 Europe

Country*** Men Women Programmed Increase in Age Requirement

Estonia 63 61 Increasing gradually to 63 for women by 2016; both increasing gradually to 65 from 2017 to 2026

Germany 65 65 If born before 1965, increasing gradually from age 65 to age 67

from 2012 to 202967 (if born after 1964)Isle of Man 65 60 Increasing gradually to 65 for women by 2020

Serbia 64 59 Increasing gradually by 6 months a year to 65 (men) or 60 (women) by 2011

United Kingdom 65 60 Increasing gradually to 65 for women from 2010 to 2020*** as of 2010

Countries with Programmed Increase in Statutory Retirement Age

Trends in Social Security

Page 198: MSS Reviewer

THANK YOU!!!