Top Banner
Viability of Using DGT Passive Samplers to Measure Dissolved Trace Elements in Subtropical Freshwater and Estuarine Environments Master of Science Thesis Defense by Michael S. Tomlinson
90
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: MS Tomlinson Defense

Viability of Using DGT Passive Samplers to Measure Dissolved Trace Elements in Subtropical Freshwater

and Estuarine Environments

Master of ScienceThesis Defense by

Michael S. Tomlinson

Page 2: MS Tomlinson Defense

Acknowledgments (mahalo nui loa!)➟ Thesis Committee:

➟ Eric De Carlo (Chair)➟ Fred Mackenzie➟ David Karl➟ Khalil Spencer

➟ The Team:➟ Scott Narod➟ Vincent Todd➟ Norine Yeung➟ Sam Saylor➟ Vincent Beltran

➟ Others:➟ Dan Hoover➟ Hao Zhang (Lancaster Univ.)➟ Nancy Koike➟ Kathy Kozuma

➟ Funding/Other Support:➟ NOAA Sea Grant➟ USEPA➟ Hawai�i DOH & DLNR➟ NSF (ICP-MS)➟ USGS

Page 3: MS Tomlinson Defense

Outline➟ Motivation➟ Study Location➟ Methods➟ Results &

Discussion➟ Conclusions

Page 4: MS Tomlinson Defense

➟ To quantify dissolved trace element inputs to aquatic habitats:➟ Methods time consuming and expensive➟ Ambiguous, definitions of dissolved vary➟ Discrete water samples are snapshots in time➟ Relation between sediment/tissue

concentrations difficult to relate to water column concentrations

➟ Often trace element concentrations <MDL

Motivation for the study

Page 5: MS Tomlinson Defense

Nonpoint source pollution (after NPDES)➟ �Nonpoint source [NPS] pollution . . .

a significant factor in coastal water degradation� (U.S. Congress, 1990)

➟ �Stormwater linked to major coastal problems� (EPA, 1993)

➟ �May be greatest threat to marine ecosystems� (Clark, 1995)

➟ bioavailability can ultimately threaten human health through consumption of aquatic organisms

Page 6: MS Tomlinson Defense

Why dissolved trace elements?

➟ Dissolved phases considered bioavailable

➟ �Bioavailability�the fraction of total contaminant in surrounding medium which is correlated with a quantitative biological response such as biomagnification� (EPA, 1992)

➟ Definition of �dissolved� is operational & varies with filter pore size (typically 0.2 to 1 µm)

Page 7: MS Tomlinson Defense

What is �dissolved�?

Page 8: MS Tomlinson Defense

Measuring NPS pollution➟ Water column sampling

➟ Sediment sampling

➟ Bioaccumulation in resident & caged species (e.g., NS&T Mussel Watch)

➟ Passive samplers

Page 9: MS Tomlinson Defense

Water column sampling:➟ Concentrations may be <MDL➟ Snapshot in time➟ Sampling, containment, &

preservation can alter chemistry

➟ Filtering can alter chemistry➟ Ambiguity between dissolved

& particulate phases

Page 10: MS Tomlinson Defense

Sediment sampling:➟ Sediments tend to be patchy

requiring numerous replicates➟ Bioturbation & other disturbances

can confound results➟ Difficult to obtain undisturbed

sediment sample➟ Sampling, containment, &

preservation can alter chemistry➟ Concentration relation

[sediment] ≠ [water column]

Page 11: MS Tomlinson Defense

Organism bioaccumulation:➟ Difficult to locate suitable type/quantity of animals➟ May accumulate dissolved & particulate pollutants➟ Inter- & intra-specific comparisons difficult➟ Animals can metabolize or depurate pollutants➟ Non-sessile organisms can move in & out of area➟ Concentration relation [organism] ≠ [water column]

NOAA NS&T Mussel Watch Program

Ostrea sandvicensis (Hawai�i)Mytilus edulis (Maine to Delaware Bay &

US West Coast)

Page 12: MS Tomlinson Defense

Interspecies differences, an example

Page 13: MS Tomlinson Defense

Passive samplers:➟ Relatively recent development➟ Time integrating device➟ Accumulate bioavailable pollutants

(exclusive of ingestable particulate matter & larger colloids)

➟ Measure pollutants <MDL➟ Relatively inexpensive➟ SPMDs sample dissolved nonpolar

organics (e.g., PCBs, pesticides)➟ DGTs sample dissolved trace elements

DGT

SPMD

Page 14: MS Tomlinson Defense

DGT (Diffusive Gradients in Thin-films)➟ Developed by Davison and Zhang (1994) of

Lancaster University➟ Measures dissolved Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Zn, Co, Ni,

Ag, Mn, Fe, Al➟ Work in saltwater, freshwater, sediments & soils➟ Consists of membrane filter, diffusive hydrogel,

resin gel, and housing (see diagram)➟ Effective pore size generally 0.002-0.005 µm

& no >0.020 µm (�standard� DGT)➟ Inexpensive (£10 or ~$17, March 2002)

Page 15: MS Tomlinson Defense

Components of a DGT sampler➟ outer sleeve & piston➟ 0.45-µm, polysulfone membrane filter➟ polyacrylamide hydrogel (~95% water)➟ layer of Chelex-100® resin in hydrogel

Page 16: MS Tomlinson Defense

Cb = bulk solution concentrationDBL = diffusive boundary layerδ = DBL thickness∆g = diffusive gel thickness (ideally ≥10 × δ)

Howthe DGT works

Page 17: MS Tomlinson Defense

DGT facts➟ Generally only labile trace elements measured➟ Temperature-related effects are predictable➟ Diffusion coefficient independent of ionic

strength of receiving water (must be >1 mM)➟ Operating pH range of 5-10 for most elements➟ Not affected by hydrodynamic conditions➟ MDL for DGT after 1 day deployment is <4 pM

(concentration factor of ~300 times)➟ Analysis involves batch leaching (typically with

80 % recovery) followed by AAS or ICP-MS

Page 18: MS Tomlinson Defense

Flow effects on Cd accumulation

C�concentrationDGT�diffusive gradient in thin-filmsASV�anodic stripping voltammetry

Page 19: MS Tomlinson Defense

Cd accumulation with time &different gel thicknesses

Time (hours) 1/∆g (1/mm)

∆g = diffusive gel thickness

Mas

s C

d (n

g)

(Zhang & Davison, 1995)

Page 20: MS Tomlinson Defense

Effects of ionic strength & pH on Cd accumulation in DGTs

(Zhang & Davison, 1995)

Page 21: MS Tomlinson Defense

pH effects on accumu-lation of different

trace elements in DGTs

Page 22: MS Tomlinson Defense

Field tests of DGTs

Page 23: MS Tomlinson Defense

Field tests of DGTs & Cu speciation

Page 24: MS Tomlinson Defense

Ala Wai Canal Watershed,

O�ahu, Hawai�i

Environmental Setting

Page 25: MS Tomlinson Defense

The study area then (ca. 1865) . . .Mānoa Valley from Waikīkī, Painting by Enoch Wood Perry, 1865

Page 26: MS Tomlinson Defense

. . . and now!

Page 27: MS Tomlinson Defense

Dual personality of theAla Wai Canal

Page 28: MS Tomlinson Defense

Dredging the Ala Wai Canal

Page 29: MS Tomlinson Defense

Sampling & DGT stations

Page 30: MS Tomlinson Defense

Discrete sampling program➟ Manual quarterly sampling, typically near base

flow conditions (4 years)

➟ Automated storm sampling (4 years)

➟ Streamflow & water quality (T, C, pH, DO & turbidity) at 5-minute intervals (4 years)

➟ Estuarine grab samples collected & water quality measured in situ concurrently with DGT (8 months)

Page 31: MS Tomlinson Defense

Station WK (WaiakeakuaStream, upper

watershed)

Page 32: MS Tomlinson Defense

Lower Ala Wai Canal watershed

Page 33: MS Tomlinson Defense

Station KHS(Mānoa-Pālolo Stream, lower

watershed)

Page 34: MS Tomlinson Defense

Station YC(Yacht Club),

estuary

Page 35: MS Tomlinson Defense

Manual water quality sampling

Dipping

In situmeasurements

Pole sampler

Streamflowmeasurements

Page 36: MS Tomlinson Defense

Automatedstormwatersampling

Page 37: MS Tomlinson Defense

Grab sample processing & analysisFiltration

FIA-ICP-MS

Page 38: MS Tomlinson Defense

DGT study design

➟ Compare stream DGT results with data from discrete base-& storm-flow samples collected over 4 years

➟ Compare estuarine DGT results with discrete samples collected concurrently with DGT retrievals over 8 months

Page 39: MS Tomlinson Defense

DGT sampling locations

Page 40: MS Tomlinson Defense

Shallow water deployment schemesStreams Estuary

Page 41: MS Tomlinson Defense

TidbiT®

temperature logger

Page 42: MS Tomlinson Defense

DGT processing matériel

Page 43: MS Tomlinson Defense

DGT processingStep 1 - DGT disassembly

Step 2 - Removal of resin gel

Step 3 - Resin gel leaching

Step 4 -ICP-MSanalysisof DGT leachate

Page 44: MS Tomlinson Defense

Calculating mean concentration

where:Cw = mean metal concentration in waterM = mass diffused into DGT)g = diffusive hydrogel thickness +

membrane filter thicknessDT = diffusion coefficient at any temperaturet = deployment (exposure) timeA = area of DGT window

Page 45: MS Tomlinson Defense
Page 46: MS Tomlinson Defense

Watershed (comparing long-term data & DGTs)

Page 47: MS Tomlinson Defense

Rainfall & mean flow during DGT deployment periods in upper (WK) & lower (KHS) watershed

Page 48: MS Tomlinson Defense

Rain in upper watershed couldaffectDGT operation, but infrequently

Page 49: MS Tomlinson Defense
Page 50: MS Tomlinson Defense
Page 51: MS Tomlinson Defense

Special 3-month deployment at WK

Page 52: MS Tomlinson Defense

WK cumulative 3-month flow

Page 53: MS Tomlinson Defense
Page 54: MS Tomlinson Defense
Page 55: MS Tomlinson Defense

Stream results and why➟ Results of various methods for determining means

from discrete samples differed considerably➟ Rating curves were appropriate for upper but not

lower watershed (except for Pb)➟ DGT results generally comparable to, but less

than, grab sample means➟ DGTs measure the aquo ion, inorganic complexes,

and possibly small organic complexes & colloids➟ Grabs include larger colloids & organic complexes➟ No clear relation between flow & dissolved trace

element concentration

Page 56: MS Tomlinson Defense

Estuary (comparing concurrent grabs & DGTs)

Page 57: MS Tomlinson Defense

YC�fouling after1 weekand4 weeks

Page 58: MS Tomlinson Defense

YC�little foulingon DGT membrane, before& after cleaning

Page 59: MS Tomlinson Defense
Page 60: MS Tomlinson Defense
Page 61: MS Tomlinson Defense

YC DGT & sample comparison

Page 62: MS Tomlinson Defense

Estuary results & why➟ DGT deployments >2 weeks not recommended➟ Grab samples collected at different stages of tide &

under different streamflow & weather conditions➟ DGT results were significantly different (α = 0.05)

from concurrent grab results except for Co➟ DGT results were not consistently higher or lower

than results from concurrent grab samples➟ CuDGT > Cugrab & > chronic & acute HAR 11-54

standard (2.9 µg/L)➟ Need many more grab samples to accurately

characterize estuary

Page 63: MS Tomlinson Defense

Conclusions:➟ To date this study is the longest deployment

of DGTs in diverse aquatic environments➟ DGTs preconcentrate dissolved trace

elements & remove matrix interference for ICP-MS

➟ DGTs are a simpler, faster, economical way to measure dissolved trace elements

➟ DGTs provide mean concentrations but they also can show long-term variability

Page 64: MS Tomlinson Defense

Conclusions (continued):➟ Watershed DGT & sample mean trace

element concentrations were similar➟ DGT means, however, often were less than

means from discrete samples➟ DGTs measure aquo ions, inorganic

complexes, small organic complexes, & very small colloids

➟ DGTs do not measure trace elements in larger colloids or organic complexes & small particulates

Page 65: MS Tomlinson Defense

DGT vs. 0.2-µm filter

Page 66: MS Tomlinson Defense
Page 67: MS Tomlinson Defense

Conclusions (continued):➟ Except for Co, DGT & concurrent estuary

samples were significantly different➟ Estuarine DGT results were not consistently

less or greater than discrete sample results➟ Dynamics & complexity of estuary requires

far more samples to characterize chemistry➟ DGTs can be deployed for up to 3 months

in relatively clean, freshwater systems

Page 68: MS Tomlinson Defense

Conclusions (continued):➟ Biofouling limits DGT deployments

1-4 weeks in subtropical estuaries➟ Operational pH range for DGTs (5-10) is

normally not a problem➟ Ionic strength rarely < 1 mM (~0.2 % of the

time in the upper watershed during storms)➟ DGTs are viable method for measuring

dissolved trace elements in subtropical freshwater & estuarine environments

Page 69: MS Tomlinson Defense

Eric, a man who loves his work . . .

. . . maybe a little too much?

Page 70: MS Tomlinson Defense

Let it never be said that Eric . . .

. . . hides from his students!

Page 71: MS Tomlinson Defense
Page 72: MS Tomlinson Defense
Page 73: MS Tomlinson Defense
Page 74: MS Tomlinson Defense
Page 75: MS Tomlinson Defense

Examplerating curve

(flow vs. Cu)

Page 76: MS Tomlinson Defense
Page 77: MS Tomlinson Defense
Page 78: MS Tomlinson Defense
Page 79: MS Tomlinson Defense
Page 80: MS Tomlinson Defense

DGT and grab sample blanks

Page 81: MS Tomlinson Defense

Upper watershed trace elements

Page 82: MS Tomlinson Defense

Lower watershed trace elements

Page 83: MS Tomlinson Defense
Page 84: MS Tomlinson Defense
Page 85: MS Tomlinson Defense

Estuarine trace elements

Page 86: MS Tomlinson Defense

YC DGT & sample comparison

Page 87: MS Tomlinson Defense
Page 88: MS Tomlinson Defense
Page 89: MS Tomlinson Defense

Open water mooring scheme

Page 90: MS Tomlinson Defense

Revised Sampling Scheme➟ Multiple (>5) blank checks before deployment➟ Three replicate DGTs deployed at each site➟ Dilute leachate by no more than 4 times➟ Continue temperature recording with TidbiTs➟ Locate inexpensive conductivity recorder➟ Deploy mid-depth in deeper stream waters➟ Collect or locate OC & speciation data➟ Multiple depths & locations in estuary➟ Deploy short- and long-term DGTs in freshwater