MPTA Survey to membership on House of Delegates Motions May 2014 A survey was conducted by MPTA members (PTs, PTAs) to gain their feedback on motions to come before the 2014 APTA House of Delegates. This survey was conducted by email announcement and online survey in May 2014. These results are available to all membership and were sent out via an e‐news update to membership at the end of the survey. Questions may be directed to Cam Williams, MPTA Chief Delegates 2014 at [email protected]. Email that had gone out to introduce the survey: MPTA House of Delegates Survey: The APTA House of Delegates is the highest policy making body of the profession of physical therapy. The House meets annually for 3 successive days each spring, during which time delegates make decisions on issues that may have far‐reaching implications for the association and for the profession of physical therapy. Each year, the MPTA sends 13 delegates to the APTA House of Delegates to help determine the focus and scope of the profession of physical therapy. This year the House of Delegates will be in Charlotte, North Carolina June 8‐11. The Michigan Delegation is interested in your thoughts and feedback about the concepts of the motions. Please take the time to complete this survey to share your thoughts with your MPTA representatives. It is estimated that this survey should take approximately 20 minutes. You may wish to examine the motions in Packet 1 on the APTA House of Delegates web page prior to taking the survey as all the motion language is not included in the survey. https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/X6NS628 The Michigan Delegates to the APTA and the Michigan Physical Therapy Association thank you for your time and efforts in providing your thoughts and opinions to help guide our profession for the future. Please remember the best way you can support your profession is to remain a lifetime member of the APTA and encourage your colleagues to become members as well. For further information, please contact Cam Williams, Chief Delegate at [email protected]or visit http://communities.apta.org/communities/HoD/Pages/Default.aspx (requires member log in) For the results of the 2014 House of Delegates, please look to the Fall Shorelines, visit www.apta.org/HOD, or attend the MPTA Fall Membership Meeting and House of Delegates meeting at the Radisson Plaza in Kalamazoo, MI October 24‐25, 2014. Sincerely, The Michigan Delegates to the APTA House of Delegates
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
MPTASurveytomembershiponHouseofDelegatesMotions
May2014
A survey was conducted by MPTA members (PTs, PTAs) to gain their feedback on motions to come before the
2014 APTA House of Delegates. This survey was conducted by email announcement and online survey in May
2014. These results are available to all membership and were sent out via an e‐news update to membership at
the end of the survey. Questions may be directed to Cam Williams, MPTA Chief Delegates 2014 at
Temporary Jurisdictional Licensure and Credentialing (HOD P06-96-26-40)
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes I am in favor of this motion 60.9% 28
No, I am not in favor of this motion 6.5% 3
I am not sure 13.0% 6
I need more information 19.6% 9
Comments, concerns, or proposed amendments
6
answered question 46
skipped question 14
11 of 34
11. RC 11-14 MEMBERSHIP VALUE FOR THE PHYSICAL THERAPIST ASSISTANT Summary:
This motion charges the BoD to develop a plan to increase the value of membership to the
APTA for PTAs. That the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) create a plan for
increasing the value of APTA membership for the physical therapist assistant (PTA) and
present the plan to the 2015 House of Delegates by December 2014. Such a plan shall
include at least the following: • Designated positions on the APTA Board of Directors for
PTA members • Eligibility of PTA members to serve on the APTA Board of Directors
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes I am in favor of this motion 52.2% 24
No, I am not in favor of this motion 17.4% 8
I am not sure 17.4% 8
I need more information 13.0% 6
Comments, concerns, or proposed amendments
5
answered question 46
skipped question 14
12 of 34
12. RC 12-14 ADOPT: PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN PHYSICAL THERAPIST PROFESSIONAL
EDUCATION Summary: This RC identifies faculty and clinical site issues to promote
sustained and future excellence in physical therapist education. To sustain present and
promote future excellence in physical therapist education, APTA recommends adoption
and implementation of the following practices: 1. That physical therapists with an interest
in teaching in physical therapist entry-level programs seek advanced terminal degrees and
other credentials and experiences that qualify them to become faculty members. 2. That
people qualified to serve as program directors do so only when the program has adequate
resources and a commitment to innovation and excellence. 3. That people qualified to
serve as faculty members do so only when the program has adequate resources and a
commitment to innovation and excellence. 4. That clinical sites be creative in how they
provide clinical education experiences and commit to providing resources for clinical
education experiences only when the academic program commits to excellence in
education and ongoing improvement and when the program’s students meet the standards
for clinical performance. 5. That the Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy
Education (CAPTE) make the criteria for existing programs, expansion of existing
programs, and candidate for accreditation status for new programs more stringent to
reflect the needs for qualified faculty and program directors, access to sufficient clinical
education sites, and adequate infrastructure (eg, physical, fiscal, and personnel); and the
current and emerging needs of society.
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes I am in favor of this motion 72.3% 34
No, I am not in favor of this motion 10.6% 5
I am not sure 10.6% 5
I need more information 10.6% 5
Comments, concerns, or proposed amendments
7
answered question 47
skipped question 13
13 of 34
13. RC 13-14 BEST PRACTICE FOR PHYSICAL THERAPIST CLINICAL EDUCATION Summary:
This motion charges the APTA Board of Directors to examine and report back on “Best
Practice in Physical Therapist Clinical Education.” That the American Physical Therapy
Association, in collaboration with relevant stakeholders, identify best practice for physical
therapist clinical education, from professional level through postgraduate clinical training,
and propose potential courses of action for a doctoring profession to move toward practice
that best meets the evolving needs of society with a report to the 2017 House of Delegates.
This effort shall include but not be limited to the examination of: • Current models of
physical therapist clinical education from professional level through postgraduate clinical
training • Mandatory postgraduate clinical training • Stages of licensure • Findings from
related studies and conferences • Models and studies of clinical education in other health
care professions
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes I am in favor of this motion 73.3% 33
No, I am not in favor of this motion 2.2% 1
I am not sure 20.0% 9
I need more information 6.7% 3
Comments, concerns, or proposed amendments
3
answered question 45
skipped question 15
14 of 34
14. RC 14-14 ADOPT: DEFINITION OF AN UNDERREPRESENTED MINORITY IN PHYSICAL
THERAPY EDUCATION Summary: This RC defines “underrepresented” populations in PT
education. The American Physical Therapy Association defines "Underrepresented” in
physical therapy education as the racial and ethnic populations that are underrepresented
in physical therapy education relative to their numbers in the general population, as well as
individuals from geographically underrepresented areas, lower economic strata, and
educationally disadvantaged backgrounds.
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes I am in favor of this motion 59.1% 26
No, I am not in favor of this motion 18.2% 8
I am not sure 9.1% 4
I need more information 15.9% 7
Comments, concerns, or proposed amendments
4
answered question 44
skipped question 16
15 of 34
15. RC 15-14 MEMBERSHIP RETENTION OF EARLY-CAREER INDIVIDUALS Summary: This
motion charges the APTA BoD to develop a plan for “early career retention.” That the
American Physical Therapy Association develop and implement a comprehensive plan to
foster engagement, stimulate grassroots activity, and increase membership retention of
early-career individuals. The plan shall be based on a thorough review of previous and
current component efforts, data from membership statistics on early-career engagement
and retention, results of similar efforts in other professional organizations, and any other
relevant information. The plan shall be developed in collaboration with relevant
stakeholders. The plan and implementation status shall be reported to the 2016 House of
Delegates.
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes I am in favor of this motion 81.8% 36
No, I am not in favor of this motion 2.3% 1
I am not sure 9.1% 4
I need more information 9.1% 4
Comments, concerns, or proposed amendments
3
answered question 44
skipped question 16
16 of 34
16. RC 16-14 APTA WHITE PAPER ON PHYSICAL THERAPIST PRODUCTIVITY Summary: This
RC charges the APTA BoD to develop a white paper concerning physical therapist
productivity. That the American Physical Therapy Association develop a white paper to
comprehensively address physical therapist productivity in the context of budget
pressures, health care reform, and complex organizational dynamics within health care
institutions.
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes I am in favor of this motion 67.4% 31
No, I am not in favor of this motion 13.0% 6
I am not sure 2.2% 1
I need more information 23.9% 11
Comments, concerns, or proposed amendments
6
answered question 46
skipped question 14
17 of 34
17. RC 17-14 ADOPT: PHYSICAL THERAPISTS QUALIFIED TO DETERMINE MOBILITY STATUS
FOR PATIENTS AND CLIENTS APPLYING FOR DISABILITY PLACARDS OR LICENSE PLATES
Summary: This motion promotes the inclusion of the physical therapist in state law as a
qualified individual to determine the mobility status of a patient or client for the purposes of
disability parking placards and license plates. The American Physical Therapy Association
supports increased consumer access to mobility status certification. As movement
experts, physical therapists should be included in state law among the health care
professionals designated as able to determine the mobility status of a patient or client for
the purposes of disability parking placards and license plates.
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes I am in favor of this motion 91.1% 41
No, I am not in favor of this motion 4.4% 2
I am not sure 0.0% 0
I need more information 4.4% 2
Comments, concerns, or proposed amendments
1
answered question 45
skipped question 15
18 of 34
18. RC 18-14 ADOPT: ENDORSEMENT OF INTERPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION
COLLABORATIVE CORE COMPETENCIES1 Summary: This RC seeks endorsement of
Interprofessional education Collaborative Core Competencies. (Note: The language in
brackets is the only language open to amendment.) [APTA encourages team-based
interprofessional education and collaborative practice by endorsing the 4 Interprofessional
Education Collaborative (IPEC)* Core Competency1 domains and their respective general
competency statement. APTA and its members will endeavor to integrate these IPEC core
competencies into practice and education initiatives, where feasible:] • Competency 1:
Values/Ethics for Interprofessional Practice: Work with individuals of other professions to
maintain a climate of mutual respect and shared values. • Competency 2:
Roles/Responsibilities: Use the knowledge of one’s own role and those of other professions
to appropriately assess and address the healthcare needs of the patients and populations
served. • Competency 3: Interprofessional Communication: Communicate with patients,
families, communities, and other health professionals in a responsive and responsible
manner that supports a team approach to the maintenance of health and the treatment of
disease. • Competency 4: Teams and Teamwork: Apply relationship-building values and the
principles of team dynamics to perform effectively in different team roles to plan and
deliver patient-/population-centered care that is safe, timely, efficient, effective, and
equitable. *As of the date of this position’s adoption, the Interprofessional Education
Collaborative (IPEC) consists of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN),
the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM), the American
Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP), the American Dental Education Association
(ADEA), the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), and the Association of
Schools of Public Health (ASPH).
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes I am in favor of this motion 83.7% 36
No, I am not in favor of this motion 2.3% 1
I am not sure 4.7% 2
I need more information 14.0% 6
Comments, concerns, or proposed amendments
1
answered question 43
skipped question 17
19 of 34
19. RC 19-14 ELECTION TO HONORARY MEMBERSHIP IN THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY
ASSOCIATION: MICHAEL J. AXE, MD Summary: This motion seeks Honorary membership for
Dr. Michael J. Axe who has made significant contributions to the science and practice of
physical therapy. …Resolved, That Michael J. Axe, MD, be elected as an Honorary Member
of the American Physical Therapy Association.
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes I am in favor of this motion 51.1% 23
No, I am not in favor of this motion 6.7% 3
I am not sure 22.2% 10
I need more information 22.2% 10
Comments, concerns, or proposed amendments
2
answered question 45
skipped question 15
20 of 34
20. RC 20-14 AMEND: BYLAWS OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION,
ARTICLE VIII., HOUSE OF DELEGATES, SECTION 4: NONVOTING DELEGATES Summary: This
RC is a Bylaw amendment to allow PT or PTA students serving on the student assembly
that graduate before the house to serve on the student assembly until the close of the
house. That Bylaws of the American Physical Therapy Association, Article VIII., House of
Delegates, Section 4: Nonvoting Delegates, A. Qualifications of Nonvoting Delegates, (3), be
amended by adding a paragraph, so that it would read: ARTICLE VIII. HOUSE OF DELEGATES
Section 4: Nonvoting Delegates The nonvoting delegates of the House of Delegates shall be
the section delegates, PTA Caucus delegates, Student Assembly delegates, and the
members of the Board of Directors. A. Qualifications of Nonvoting Delegates * * * (3)
Student Assembly delegates: Only Student Physical Therapist and Student Physical
Therapist Assistant members who have been Association members in good standing for
the 4 months immediately preceding the start of the House session may serve as Student
Assembly delegates. For the purposes of this subparagraph (3), members who have
converted under Article XI, Section 3, from Student Physical Therapist to Physical Therapist
or from Student Physical Therapist Assistant to Physical Therapist Assistant shall be
deemed members of the Student Assembly until the close of the House of Delegates
meeting immediately following the date of graduation and shall be eligible to serve as
Student Assembly delegates during that period.
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes I am in favor of this motion 79.5% 35
No, I am not in favor of this motion 4.5% 2
I am not sure 6.8% 3
I need more information 9.1% 4
Comments, concerns, or proposed amendments 0
answered question 44
skipped question 16
21 of 34
21. RC 21-14 EFFORTS TO CURB FRAUD AND ABUSE Summary: This motion charges the
board to increase efforts in the area of fraud and abuse. That the American Physical
Therapy Association continue efforts to curb the incidence of fraud and abuse committed
by physical therapists. Efforts may include but are not limited to the following: •
Collaboration with the Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy (FSBPT) •
Amendment to or creation of APTA positions, standards, guidelines, policies, and
procedures to clearly delineate the association’s stance on these issues, for presentation
to the 2015 House of Delegates • Development of educational resources specific to fraud
and abuse issues for physical therapist and physical therapist assistant programs •
Evaluation of the strategies APTA adopts to curb fraud and abuse within the profession
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes I am in favor of this motion 88.9% 40
No, I am not in favor of this motion 4.4% 2
I am not sure 6.7% 3
I need more information 2.2% 1
Comments, concerns, or proposed amendments
3
answered question 45
skipped question 15
22. Do you have any other comments, questions, or concerns?
Response
Count
4
answered question 4
skipped question 56
22 of 34
Page 1, Q1. RC 1-14 AMENDS: STANDING RULE, 21. DEFINITION OF ASSOCIATION VIEWPOINTS ANDADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVES
Summary: This RC identifies the binding documents of the association and uses the terminology of policy andprocedure as consistent terminology for non-binding principles or positions that gui...
1 I am reluctant to sign off on a Procedure without the opportunity to review thatprocedure.
May 15, 2014 8:52 AM
Page 2, Q2. RC 2-14 RESCINDS: COVER THE UNINSURED CAMPAIGN: AWARENESS AND PROMOTION
Summary: This campaign closed in June 2011. Furthermore the Affordable Care Act has rendered it mute.
1 I think a motion to help promote the Affordable Care Act would be a nicereplacement to this RC
May 18, 2014 8:23 PM
2 Seems to be a mute point May 13, 2014 6:59 PM
Page 3, Q3. RC 3-14 AMEND: PHYSICAL THERAPIST RESPONSIBILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY FOR DELIVERYOF CARE, PROVISO TO RESOLVED CLAUSE (HOD P06-12-06-08)
Summary: This RC contains a more fully defined proviso to PHYSICAL THERAPIST RESPONSIBILITY ANDACCOUNTABILITY FOR DELIVERY OF CARE (HOD P06-12-06-08) to more...
1 The House of Delegates is voting yes or no on whether the APTA will NOTapprove a policy? Really?
May 15, 2014 8:56 AM
2 If we are to move into the direction of full direct access - we need full autonomyto be responsible & accountable. We don't need further assessment or reviewsof our capability to be autonomous!
May 14, 2014 10:02 PM
23 of 34
24 of 34
Page 4, Q4. RC 4-14 AMEND: PHYSICAL THERAPIST RESPONSIBILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY FOR DELIVERYOF CARE, RESOLVED CLAUSE (HOD P06-12-06-08)
Summary: This motion adds clarity to support personnel naming the PTA as the primary assistive personnel. Italso includes language that recognized support personnel may...
1 In general, I am not in favor of the existence of the Physical Therapist Assistantas a profession.
May 18, 2014 8:25 PM
2 In my practice I do not use PTA's as I feel great continuity of treatment andbetter outcomes are achieved using PT's to implement treatments andtechniques
May 15, 2014 11:42 AM
3 On the surface this sounds good. However, what are the ramifications forutilizing Physical Therapy Aides? While I am not concerned that a PT Aideshould ever be expected to perform "selected tests and measures", as those canbe completed by the Physical Therapist or PT Assistant. I am concerned aboutlimiting the Physical Therapist’s ability to utilize PT Aides/Techs. TheseAides/Techs can be trained to perform interventions that have already beeninstructed by the PT, based upon the Physical Therapist’s assessment, decisionmaking and plan development, and that are a valuable part of the delivery ofquality Physical Therapy care. A PT Aide can follow up on routine exercises oractivities that have been taught by the PT (to the Aide AND the patient), and aresupervised by the PT. A variety of such activities require the necessary repetitionto assure a positive learning curve on the part of the patient. That is still a part ofthe therapeutic process. The PT Aide can assist patients in utilizing equipment,providing for their safety AND assuring the completion of that therapeutic activity.Does it raise the level of our profession when these routine, but necessaryinterventions are only performed by the PT? Is it only an exercise if a PT countsthe repetitions? Is it only an ultrasound if delivered by a PT....or PT Assistant? Ihave to believe that it is when we, the highly trained Physical Therapists, utilizeour skills in Assessment, Critical Decision Making, Planning and Teaching, thatwe are performing at the highest level of our profession. I have seriousreservations that the restrictive language of this resolution will serve to waterdown the Physical Therapy profession and we will be tasked to perform even themost simple (but necessary) tasks, in order to claim them as our own. PhysicalTherapy is what we direct, not just what we do.
May 15, 2014 10:37 AM
4 This does not allow various management models to be utilized. It corners us intothe same old, same old model of care.
May 14, 2014 10:10 PM
5 I would add something about discussing/collaborating with the primary PT whenthe PTA performs selected tests/measures
May 14, 2014 5:31 PM
6 One, I believe we should hold with the PTA as the only recognized supportpersonnel. Two, I am concerned about adding the performance of selectedtests and measures by "recognized assistive personnel" within the examinationcomponent of the patient/client management model.
May 14, 2014 9:30 AM
7 this language is so confusing. don't we learn anything from reading the crapissued by congress that we need to just say what we want to say in non-lawyercrap talk?!
May 14, 2014 8:09 AM
8 Athletic trainers need it be recognized as equal to or more than the PTA. May 13, 2014 8:18 PM
25 of 34
Page 4, Q4. RC 4-14 AMEND: PHYSICAL THERAPIST RESPONSIBILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY FOR DELIVERYOF CARE, RESOLVED CLAUSE (HOD P06-12-06-08)
Summary: This motion adds clarity to support personnel naming the PTA as the primary assistive personnel. Italso includes language that recognized support personnel may...
9 This would have kept us out of trouble with LARA when the admin rules werewritten....this is a more realistic reflection of current, appropriate practices.
May 13, 2014 7:57 PM
Page 5, Q5. RC 5-14 AMEND: ACCESS TO, ADMISSION TO, AND PATIENT/CLIENT RIGHTS WITHIN PHYSICALTHERAPY SERVICES (HOD P06-03-16-13)
Summary: The RC adds the terminology of sex, gender identity, and gender expression to existing policy.
That Access to, Admission to, and Patient/Client Rights Within Physi...
1 Aren't sex and gender the same thing. One or the other term would be sufficientand not redundant. The same for gender identity and gender expression.
May 19, 2014 9:48 PM
2 The word gender is sufficient and to me, covers the other words, "sex, gender,gender identity, gender expression" and increased specificity in this case couldcreate more loopholes because it isn't expressly stated.
May 14, 2014 9:36 AM
3 Gender is a biological fact and needs no further explanation. Gender identity,gender expression and sexual orientation allows for subjective interpretation.Aside from public hype, this information is no more important than ones favoritecolor, political allegiance or any other variable that is based on ones opinion.
May 13, 2014 9:42 PM
4 Political correctness.... May 13, 2014 8:31 PM
5 It is a pity that such language is even necessary May 13, 2014 5:54 PM
6 It would seem that the new words encompass the term "sexual orientation". If itis consensus that such is true, then it would be best to remove "sexualorientation" from the list.
Summary: This RC adds the terminology of gender identity and gender expression to existing policy.
That Non-discrimination (HOD Y06-98-14-06), first paragraph, be amended by inserting the words “gender identity,gender expression” afte...
1 No for same reasons as above. May 19, 2014 9:48 PM
2 The term, "gender" is sufficient. May 14, 2014 9:36 AM
3 Bias is bias and should be avoided. There are hundreds, even thousands ofcharacter traits and personal viewpoints that are not specifically listed in the RC.Does that mean we can be biased towards people because they are not listed inthis RC. Of course not. These words need not be added other than to pacify themedias obsession and a special interest groups agenda. The APTA should bewho they are and not get sucked in to this political correctness contest. Theexisting RC can stand for itself without amendment.
May 13, 2014 9:42 PM
4 It is a pity that such language is even necessary May 13, 2014 5:54 PM
5 It would seem that the new words encompass the term "sexual orientation". If itis consensus that such is true, then it would be best to remove "sexualorientation" from the list.
May 13, 2014 5:05 PM
Page 6, Q7. RC 7-14 AMEND: ENTRY POINT INTO HEALTH CARE (HOD P06-02-23-45)
Summary: This motion amends language to ENTRY POINT INTO HEALTH CARE.
That Entry Point Into Health Care (HOD P06-02-23-45) be amended by substitution:
The American Physical Therapy Association supports physical therapists ...
1 "Primary care" services language should be altered to express a broader view. May 14, 2014 9:31 AM
Page 6, Q8. RC 8-14 ADOPT: TELEHEALTH
Summary: This motion identifies Telehealth as an appropriate method to provide physical therapy services.
TELEHEALTH…Resolved, It is the position of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) that telehealth is anappropriate model of service delivery for t...
1 Not sure exactly what constitutes telehealth. May 19, 2014 9:49 PM
27 of 34
28 of 34
Page 7, Q9. RC 9-14 PURSUIT OF DPT AS REGULATORY DESIGNATION OF PHYSICAL THERAPISTS
Summary: This motion promotes actions to standardize the regulatory designation of physical therapists acrossall jurisdictions to the DPT.
That the American Physical Therapy Association pursue a uniform change in the ...
1 I am a BSPT. Unless you plan to grandfather me in as a DPT, I object to the ideathat I might be out of a profession in the year 2020.
May 19, 2014 9:52 PM
2 The DPT is the degree. In 2020 we will still have PTs in practice who have notearned the DPT degree.
May 16, 2014 11:20 AM
3 How will this impact Physical Therapists who have not completed a DPTprogram? If there is an expectation that current non-DPT practitioners will obtaintheir DPT, a 2020 deadline does not allow enough time for existing non-DPTPhysical Therapists to transition to a DPT. Requiring a DPT designation shouldonly occur when regulatory and reimbursement agencies recognize a differentialin the care delivered by a DPT versus a non-DPT practitioner. As a matter ofprincipal, the APTA should provide factual data that indicates that the DPTTherapists provides a higher level and quality of care than a non-DPTpractitioner.
May 15, 2014 10:37 AM
4 Nothing changes... we need full direct access w/o limitations; we need to get ridof signed plans of care; we need full autonomy to delegate as we choose orcreate a business model/care model that is sustainable. The "title" doesn't solveanything....
May 14, 2014 10:23 PM
5 would that require everyone to have a DPT? I am not in favor of having to returnto school to get mine after 13 years of practice and multiple continuing edcourses, certifications.
May 14, 2014 5:34 PM
6 I do not favor grandfathering all PTs to the DPT May 14, 2014 1:39 PM
7 The language I have seen in relation to this would seem to be that you wouldhave to be a DPT to practice, or this is what it's leading to. As a non-doctoral PTand not planning on getting one, this language would seem to be very dividing inthe association. I fully support Con Ed requirements, etc., but do not believe theonly designation of a PT should be DPT.
May 14, 2014 10:52 AM
8 what happens to p.t.'s who went to school before the dpt? and are still practicing May 14, 2014 10:10 AM
9 Not sure if I will still be practicing at that time, but if I was, I'd have to begrandfathered in then...
May 14, 2014 9:38 AM
10 I would be concerned- does this mean that those who don't have a DPTacademic degree would automatically be given the 'DPT' credentials? Or wouldthis just be the minimum standard for entry into the profession? Where do thosewithout the DPT stand- do they have to get the DPT or would their years ofclinical experience or other higher academic degrees (PhD, DSc, EdD) beadequate?
May 13, 2014 9:44 PM
11 Simplification will help with public understanding. Confusion should be identifiedand removed when possible.
May 13, 2014 9:43 PM
12 Should be uniform although I am not a proponent of entry level DPT. May 13, 2014 8:33 PM
29 of 34
Page 7, Q9. RC 9-14 PURSUIT OF DPT AS REGULATORY DESIGNATION OF PHYSICAL THERAPISTS
Summary: This motion promotes actions to standardize the regulatory designation of physical therapists acrossall jurisdictions to the DPT.
That the American Physical Therapy Association pursue a uniform change in the ...
13 This could be very very difficult....permitting the use of the title "doctor" in allstates is one thing, but having the reg designation is a bit premature...there willbe issues related to grandfathering, and I don't think the proportions of thosewith and without DPT degrees is yet at a tipping point where this makessense...it is premature and will be very divisive within our membership. We justgot done healing from the change to a DPT.... BTW...this comment is from aDPT....
May 13, 2014 7:57 PM
14 What does this mean to PTs with a Bachelors or Masters degree? Willconsumers discriminate based on perceived level of ability based on education?
May 13, 2014 5:56 PM
15 Not sure if it is appropriate for use by individuals who do not have the actual DPTdegree/credential, including individuals with a PhD. Maybe needs to qualify thatthe DPT designation for individuals with a DPT degree.
May 13, 2014 5:10 PM
Page 8, Q10. RC 10-14 CONSUMER PROTECTION THROUGH LICENSURE OF PHYSICAL THERAPISTS ANDPHYSICAL THERAPIST ASSISTANTS
Summary: Consumer Protection Through PT and PTA Licensure has 2 parts-Part A Minimum Qualifications forLicense or Regulation, Part B item to rescind a selection of positions that would be ...
1 This is a state issue... the states are all different and it is not realistic forconsistency to be achieved at this point in time. The $$ it costs to change statepractice acts is not worth it.
May 14, 2014 10:27 PM
2 What is the minimum qualification - not clear from this text. In favor of all stateshaving licensure - is the same for all states?
May 14, 2014 11:04 AM
3 I am not sure why the use of the title 'Doctor' would be rescinded- if they havethe degree, they should be able to use it properly.
May 13, 2014 9:47 PM
4 Athletic trainers need to be recognized! May 13, 2014 8:20 PM
5 I am not sure exactly what this motion does, but rescinding te following does notseem wise: - Designation “PT,” “PTA,” “SPT,” and “SPTA” (HOD P06-03-17-14) •Protection of Term, Title, and Designation (HOD P06-03-18-15) •Use ofthe Title “Doctor” by Physical Therapists (HOD P06-06-21-14)
May 13, 2014 7:57 PM
6 There is a difference between "Mute" and "Moot". This question should read"Moot"
May 13, 2014 5:57 PM
30 of 34
Page 9, Q11. RC 11-14 MEMBERSHIP VALUE FOR THE PHYSICAL THERAPIST ASSISTANT
Summary: This motion charges the BoD to develop a plan to increase the value of membership to the APTA forPTAs. That the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) create a plan for increasing the value of APTAmembership fo...
1 If the number of PTA's that could be on the board were limited, I would support May 21, 2014 9:55 AM
2 What evidence do we presently have regarding the value of membership toPTAs?
May 16, 2014 11:25 AM
3 I've never been a fan of PTAs being part of APTA. PTAs should have no say orrole in shaping the physical therapist's profession.
May 14, 2014 10:29 PM
4 I believe the interests of Physical Therapists is best represented by PhysicalTherapists.
May 13, 2014 9:50 PM
5 Developing a plan is not a bad idea, but I don't think it is appropriate to tie thehands of the BOD by requiring that the plan include the specific bullets indicated...
Summary: This RC identifies faculty and clinical site issues to promote sustained and future excellence inphysical therapist education.
To sustain present and promote future excellence in physical therapist ...
1 Although I support the intent of this motion, I am uncertain if this is the bestmethod to obtain the desired outcome. I am sure much discussion will occur!
May 16, 2014 11:25 AM
2 I feel this is CAPTE's job. May 14, 2014 9:32 AM
3 This sounds good but my understanding is that getting qualified teachers for PTprograms is challenging and the demand outweighs the supply. This RC wouldseem to make it more difficult for programs to find and keep qualified teachers??
May 13, 2014 9:50 PM
4 I feel CAPTE taks care of this for us May 13, 2014 7:02 PM
5 There is already a steep barrier in terms of paperwork to taking a student. Thismust be implemented in a way that does not exacerbate the challenges of takinga student.
May 13, 2014 5:59 PM
6 The HOD cannot dictate to CAPTE ... I would like to know what the problems arethat this motion is trying to fix ... Programs don't get accredited already if theydon't have sufficient resources and institutional committment
May 13, 2014 5:19 PM
7 CAPTE needs to be careful in respecting the authority and autonomy ofuniversities in decision-making regarding physical therapy degree programs. PTfaculty and programs can't use CAPTE as a 'hammer' to solve problems thatthey create and perpetuate in their PT education programs. The reality ofstudent debt loads for PT education will begin to change the demographics ofwho applies to PT school and who considers PT as a career choice, and yet webuild bigger credit loads into existing programs to justify higher expecationstowards entry-level competence of graduates.
May 13, 2014 4:55 PM
Page 10, Q13. RC 13-14 BEST PRACTICE FOR PHYSICAL THERAPIST CLINICAL EDUCATION
Summary: This motion charges the APTA Board of Directors to examine and report back on “Best Practice inPhysical Therapist Clinical Education.”
That the American Physical Therapy Association, in collaboration with relevant st...
1 I would suggest that we use the terms clinical education and residency educationseparately- one is during the professional training, one is post professionaltraining. I would ask that the APTA establish a best practice including both.
May 13, 2014 9:50 PM
2 How is this going to be different than the two prior Clinical Education ConsensusConferences??? I attended both.....nothing yet resulted.....Not sure how thiswould be done differently again. The barriers to this effort being successful aremany...unless the end game is a recommended change to CAPTE...otherwise,programs will not change.....
May 13, 2014 7:57 PM
32 of 34
Page 10, Q13. RC 13-14 BEST PRACTICE FOR PHYSICAL THERAPIST CLINICAL EDUCATION
Summary: This motion charges the APTA Board of Directors to examine and report back on “Best Practice inPhysical Therapist Clinical Education.”
That the American Physical Therapy Association, in collaboration with relevant st...
3 It's time to change clinical education models... we have been doing the samething for more than 30 years without evaluation and consideration of bettermodels.
May 13, 2014 4:56 PM
Page 11, Q14. RC 14-14 ADOPT: DEFINITION OF AN UNDERREPRESENTED MINORITY IN PHYSICAL THERAPYEDUCATION
Summary: This RC defines “underrepresented” populations in PT education.
The American Physical Therapy Association defines "Underrepresented” in physical therapy education as theracial and ethnic popul...
1 Does this mean students or educators or both? May 18, 2014 8:30 PM
2 Do I understand that this resolution merely defines "underrepresented", and noother action is involved?
May 15, 2014 10:42 AM
3 Too narrow in scope only citing racial and ethnic populations. May 14, 2014 9:34 AM
4 Not sure of the context for application of this definition - is the population theentire US population, or the population primarily served by the educationalinstitution it would be applied to ... ?
May 13, 2014 5:28 PM
Page 11, Q15. RC 15-14 MEMBERSHIP RETENTION OF EARLY-CAREER INDIVIDUALS
Summary: This motion charges the APTA BoD to develop a plan for “early career retention.”
That the American Physical Therapy Association develop and implement a comprehensive plan to fosterengagement, stimulate grassroots activity, ...
1 The BoD has already done and is doing this. May 14, 2014 9:34 AM
2 I'm not sure what "early career retention" means in this context. Is the concernthat clinicians graduate, and quickly abandon the field?
May 13, 2014 6:01 PM
3 Summary says "early career retention" - is the motion to address individualsdropping out of the profession? Or is it to address individuals dropping theirAPTA membership early in their careers as physical therapists?
May 13, 2014 5:28 PM
33 of 34
Page 12, Q16. RC 16-14 APTA WHITE PAPER ON PHYSICAL THERAPIST PRODUCTIVITY
Summary: This RC charges the APTA BoD to develop a white paper concerning physical therapist productivity.
That the American Physical Therapy Association develop a white paper to comprehensively address physicaltherapist produc...
1 absolutely! May 21, 2014 9:57 AM
2 The current fee for service payment model will be obsolete. This is a waste oftime and money.
May 14, 2014 10:33 PM
3 90% productivity is impossible if you want to provide quality care and it seemsmost rehab companies are requiring 88-95%. This leads to poor and/orunethical tx
May 14, 2014 5:37 PM
4 What would be the cost involved with this. May 14, 2014 1:42 PM
5 Something like this, maybe not this exact wording, will be needed if the paymentstructure changes from it's current unit based to the proposed patientacuity/difficulty model.
May 14, 2014 9:44 AM
6 Definitely needed! May 13, 2014 6:16 PM
Page 12, Q17. RC 17-14 ADOPT: PHYSICAL THERAPISTS QUALIFIED TO DETERMINE MOBILITY STATUS FORPATIENTS AND CLIENTS APPLYING FOR DISABILITY PLACARDS OR LICENSE PLATES
Summary: This motion promotes the inclusion of the physical therapist in state law as a qualified individual todetermine the mobility status o...
1 There are far too many disability placards/license plates dispensed for noapparent mobility issues; perhaps PTs are the right profession to determine sucha status.
Summary: This RC seeks endorsement of Interprofessional education Collaborative Core Competencies.
(Note: The language in brackets is the only language open to amendment.)[APTA encourages team-base...
1 You might want to bury the hatchet and resume constructive conversations withthe National Athletic Trainers' Association. Just a thought.
May 15, 2014 10:46 AM
34 of 34
Page 13, Q19. RC 19-14 ELECTION TO HONORARY MEMBERSHIP IN THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPYASSOCIATION: MICHAEL J. AXE, MD
Summary: This motion seeks Honorary membership for Dr. Michael J. Axe who has made significantcontributions to the science and practice of physical therapy.
…Resolved, That Michael J. ...
1 what exactly did he do?? May 14, 2014 5:39 PM
2 Mike and I attended Jr/Sr high school together and I have been impressed withhis collaboration with U of Delaware PT faculty over the years... this honorary isdeserved.
May 13, 2014 5:02 PM
Page 13, Q21. RC 21-14 EFFORTS TO CURB FRAUD AND ABUSE
Summary: This motion charges the board to increase efforts in the area of fraud and abuse.
That the American Physical Therapy Association continue efforts to curb the incidence of fraud and abusecommitted by physical therapists. Efforts may include...
1 How many of APTA members have been involved in fraud & abuse? This is awaste of $ and time. Some of the fraud and abuse in PT isn't even done byphysical therapists! A "popular" topic, but doesn't apply to most members. If dataindicates majority of fraud & abuse done by members, then I'd agree.
May 14, 2014 10:38 PM
2 The BoD is already doing this. May 14, 2014 9:35 AM
3 Will this use resources that could be spent on other PT issues? This issue isimportant but would not be above many other issues that I feel are moreimportant to our profession.
May 13, 2014 9:55 PM
Page 14, Q22. Do you have any other comments, questions, or concerns?
1 Please share the results of survey with MI members. MI delegates need to showsome level of accountability if members follow tweets of video or sit in sessions.
May 14, 2014 10:39 PM
2 I am very concerned about the Marketing Driven trend in outpatient clinics topromote "PT only" services. This is marketing trend s devalueing the PTA, andinsurance companies are following suit. What is being done to promote andpreserve the function and value of the PTA
May 14, 2014 8:43 PM
3 can video be obtain somehow other than Twitter? via a website? Many of usdon't use Twitter
May 14, 2014 5:40 PM
4 Thank for the chance to provide feedback...GREAT idea!!! May 13, 2014 7:57 PM