Top Banner
MPO 674 Lecture 20 3/26/15
15
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: MPO 674 Lecture 20 3/26/15. 3d-Var vs 4d-Var.

MPO 674 Lecture 20

3/26/15

Page 2: MPO 674 Lecture 20 3/26/15. 3d-Var vs 4d-Var.

3d-Var vs 4d-Var

Page 3: MPO 674 Lecture 20 3/26/15. 3d-Var vs 4d-Var.
Page 4: MPO 674 Lecture 20 3/26/15. 3d-Var vs 4d-Var.
Page 5: MPO 674 Lecture 20 3/26/15. 3d-Var vs 4d-Var.
Page 6: MPO 674 Lecture 20 3/26/15. 3d-Var vs 4d-Var.

Ensemble Kalman Filters

• Want flow-dependent, dynamical covariances• Several different types of Kalman filter exist, all of

which have a linear inference. Non-linear filters are too hard. Seek simple approximations ...

• Ensemble Kalman filters use Pf = Zf ZfT

Zf is an n x k matrix containing k ensemble perturbations (about a mean state) of length n.

Perturbation

Page 7: MPO 674 Lecture 20 3/26/15. 3d-Var vs 4d-Var.

Pf = Zf ZfT

(u’1)1 (u’1)2 (u’1)3

(v’1)1 (v’1)2 (v’1)3

(T’1)1 (T’1)2 (T’1)3

(p’1)1 (p’1)2 (p’1)3

(u’2)1 (u’2)2 (u’2)3

(v’2)1 (v’2)2 (v’2)3

(T’2)1 (T’2)2 (T’2)3

(p’2)1 (p’2)2 (p’2)3

(u’3)1 (u’3)2 (u’3)3

… … …

… … …

(u’1)1 (v’1)1 (T’1)1 (p’1)1 (u’2)1 (v’2)1 (T’2)1 (p’2)1 (u’3)1

(u’1)2 (v’1)2 (T’1)2 (p’1)2 (u’2)2 (v’2)2 (T’2)2 (p’2)2 (u’3)2

(u’1)3 (v’1)3 (T’1)3 (p’1)3 (u’2)3 (v’2)3 (T’2)3 (p’2)3 (u’3)3

1 2 3 Ensemble members

Page 8: MPO 674 Lecture 20 3/26/15. 3d-Var vs 4d-Var.

Pf = Zf ZfT

(u’1)1 (v’1)1 (T’1)1 (p’1)1 (u’2)1 (v’2)1 (T’2)1 (p’2)1 (u’3)1

(u’1)2 (v’1)2 (T’1)2 (p’1)2 (u’2)2 (v’2)2 (T’2)2 (p’2)2 (u’3)2

(u’1)3 (v’1)3 (T’1)3 (p’1)3 (u’2)3 (v’2)3 (T’2)3 (p’2)3 (u’3)3

(u’1)1 (u’1)2 (u’1)3

(v’1)1 (v’1)2 (v’1)3

(T’1)1 (T’1)2 (T’1)3

(p’1)1 (p’1)2 (p’1)3

(u’2)1 (u’2)2 (u’2)3

(v’2)1 (v’2)2 (v’2)3

(T’2)1 (T’2)2 (T’2)3

(p’2)1 (p’2)2 (p’2)3

(u’3)1 (u’3)2 (u’3)3

… … …

… … …

1 2 3 Ensemble members

Page 9: MPO 674 Lecture 20 3/26/15. 3d-Var vs 4d-Var.

Pf = Zf ZfT

(u’1)1 (v’1)1 (T’1)1 (p’1)1 (u’2)1 (v’2)1 (T’2)1 (p’2)1 (u’3)1

(u’1)2 (v’1)2 (T’1)2 (p’1)2 (u’2)2 (v’2)2 (T’2)2 (p’2)2 (u’3)2

(u’1)3 (v’1)3 (T’1)3 (p’1)3 (u’2)3 (v’2)3 (T’2)3 (p’2)3 (u’3)3

1 2 3 Ensemble members

(u’1)1 (u’1)2 (u’1)3

(v’1)1 (v’1)2 (v’1)3

(T’1)1 (T’1)2 (T’1)3

(p’1)1 (p’1)2 (p’1)3

(u’2)1 (u’2)2 (u’2)3

(v’2)1 (v’2)2 (v’2)3

(T’2)1 (T’2)2 (T’2)3

(p’2)1 (p’2)2 (p’2)3

(u’3)1 (u’3)2 (u’3)3

… … …

… … …

Page 10: MPO 674 Lecture 20 3/26/15. 3d-Var vs 4d-Var.

Sampling Errorand Covariance Localization

Page 11: MPO 674 Lecture 20 3/26/15. 3d-Var vs 4d-Var.

Petrie (1998, MS Thesis)

Page 12: MPO 674 Lecture 20 3/26/15. 3d-Var vs 4d-Var.

Example of covariance localization

Background-error correlations estimated from 25 members of a 200-member ensemble exhibit a large amount of structure that does not appear to have any physical meaning. Without correction, an observation at the dotted location would produce increments across the globe.

Proposed solution is element-wise multiplication of the ensemble estimates (a) with a smooth correlation function (c) to produce (d), which now resembles thelarge-ensemble estimate (b). This has been dubbed “covariance localization.”

from Hamill, Chapter 6 of “Predictability of Weather and Climate”

obslocation

Page 13: MPO 674 Lecture 20 3/26/15. 3d-Var vs 4d-Var.

Filter Divergence

Page 14: MPO 674 Lecture 20 3/26/15. 3d-Var vs 4d-Var.

Hamill et al. (2001, MWR)

Page 15: MPO 674 Lecture 20 3/26/15. 3d-Var vs 4d-Var.

Hamill et al. (2001, MWR)