2/22/2018 1 What’s My Next Line? Moving our Learners to Independence SWCOLT 2018 Greta Lundgaard [email protected]Learning Goals ▪I can explain the Gradual Release of Responsibility Instructional Framework ▪I can recognize routines and strategies that inhibit learner independence. ▪I can use the GRR to plan effective scaffolding & cueing to promote learner independence.
16
Embed
Moving our Learners to Independencetoolsfromtexas.wikispaces.com/file/view/Key Slides_What's...2/22/2018 5 Naming, Framing, Modeling: I Do Focused Instruction: Teacher as Model, Input
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
2/22/2018
1
What’s My Next Line?Moving our Learners to IndependenceSWCOLT 2018Greta [email protected]
Learning Goals
▪I can explain the Gradual Release of Responsibility Instructional Framework▪I can recognize routines and strategies that
inhibit learner independence.▪I can use the GRR to plan effective
scaffolding & cueing to promote learner independence.
2/22/2018
2
The Graduated Release of Responsibility
▪The gradual release of responsibility instructional framework purposefully shifts the cognitive load from teacher-as-model, to joint responsibility of teacher and learner, to independent practice and application by the learner ▫moves from teacher assuming all the responsibility for
performing a task to the students assuming all of the responsibility
I do → We do → You do → ReflectionNaming, Framing, & Modeling
Guided Practice
CollaborativeWork
Independent Work
Sharing & Reflection
Input:Focus LessonDemonstrate “in action”
Lead through PracticeShared & guided processing
Work together to use the skillCollaborative group practice
Use skill independently
Reflect on progress & where to go next
Adapted from The Gradual Release of Responsibility Model: A Learning Framework ( Pearson and Gallagher, 1983)
@ www.room21.com.au
2/22/2018
5
Naming, Framing, Modeling: I Do▪Focused Instruction: Teacher as Model, Input Provider▫Why are we doing this?▫What do we already know?▫Where does it fit with what we did in the previous
learning episode?▫What are the new “Know” elements?▫What is the “Do” task: How will it develop skill or
expertise?
Adapted from The Gradual Release of Responsibility Model: A Learning Framework ( Pearson and Gallagher, 1983)@
www.room21.com.au
Tips for I Do▪Be sure to have a clear learning purpose ▪Strive to cognitively engage learners with input▪Make sure the input is comprehensible
Cautions for I Do▪Too much input at one time: chunk input based on lesson can-do▪Not connecting the I Do phase to a specific lesson can-do
2/22/2018
6
Trying It Out together: We Do Guided▪Initial Guided Learning: Teacher as model: students imitate and expand▪Subsequent Guided Learning: Teacher as facilitator: Strong Support maintained by teacher▪Goal: Learners to work through new knowledge by using and doing; A low risk environment with opportunities to learn from mistakes
Adapted from The Gradual Release of Responsibility Model: A Learning Framework ( Pearson and Gallagher, 1983)@
www.room21.com.au
Scaffolding & Cueing
2/22/2018
7
Scaffolding:
▪All tasks build up to language goals or can-do statements▪Tasks are just above what students can do at the time▪Teacher assists until students’ knowledge & capabilities are meeting the task requirements
Adapted from Jessica Haxhi, Staying in the Target Language in the World Language Classroom:
Scaffolding, Tretyakovsky Proyezd, Moscow. Taken by Robert Broadie on 3 August 2005
Building up student capabilities Step-by Step
Scaffolding: Develop or Extend Skills
From a presentation by Laura Terrill
Create sentences that combine the ideas in both images. Include these words
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND
This
Photo
by U
nknow
n A
uth
or
is
licensed u
nder
CC
BY
-SA
Ask a classmate what he/she did last night. Ask a follow up question to get more details.
1. What was your opinion about . . .?2. Why did you . . . .?3. What did you think about . . .?4. Why do you like . . . . better than . . . ?5. Who do you regularly do . . . with and why?6. What other activities do you usually do?
Goal of Cueing: Get the learner to reliably respond to the prompting or imitate the cue in his language production or output
Adapted from MacDuff, Krantz, and McClannahan (1993)
What is Cueing or Prompting?
▪Cues or prompting are extra or artificial stimuli whose purpose is to get specific responses or behavior to occur.▪A cue or prompting is added to a situation in which the desired response or behavior is not yet natural. ▪Examples: verbal prompts, modeling, physical cues, visual or graphic cues, text cues
MacDuff, Krantz, and McClannahan (1993)
2/22/2018
10
Potential Pitfall: Cue Dependence
▪If a learner is Cue or Prompting Dependent, he responds to the prompting or cue instead of the task.▪Cues or prompting must be removed and the learner must respond as desired in “the natural environment”.▪The learner’s response in “the natural environment” is evidence of independent production or level of transfer.
Adapted from MacDuff, Krantz, and McClannahan (1993)
Solution: Cue or Prompt Fading▪Decreasing Assistance (from MOST assistance to LEAST assistance) tends to consistently produce fewer errors and more rapid skill acquisition (Demchak 1990)
▪Cues and prompting are useful initially in helping learners display new or desirable products or language output, but new skills are mastered (i.e., performed correctly and independently) only if cues and prompting can be removed.
MacDuff, Krantz, and McClannahan (1993)
2/22/2018
11
Think Turn and TalkHow do Step-by-Step Activities scaffold for success?What resonated with you about cueing and prompting?
Tips for We Do Guided▪Plan a series of guided instructional events▪Use Cues, Prompts, Questions to guide learners; SCAFFOLDING BEGINS HERE
Cautions for We Do Guided▪Anticipate misunderstandings & plan for them▪Don’t forget to Differentiate here!▪Increase or decrease scaffolding as needed
2/22/2018
12
You Support Each Other: We do Collaborative
▪Teacher as coach: intervening only as needed (differentiate level of support)▪Students take over the learning task and negotiate meaning▪Student-to-student work in pairs or small groups▪Teacher acts on feedback/correction of misconceptions or misunderstandings
Adapted from The Gradual Release of Responsibility Model: A Learning Framework ( Pearson and Gallagher, 1983)@
www.room21.com.au
Tips for We Do Collaborative▪Vary mode of communication▪Vary group size (partners, triads, quads)▪Plan for ability +1—with room for productive struggle
Cautions for We Do Collaborative
▪Don’t introduce new material here▪Don’t forget to reduce scaffolding & amount of cueing
2/22/2018
13
On My Own: You Do
Goal: Allow students to do as much as they can with as little scaffolding or cueing as
possible.
▪Teacher as observer, evaluator, monitor
▪Students independently use new learning to complete task with minimal cueing
Adapted from The Gradual Release of Responsibility Model: A Learning Framework ( Pearson and Gallagher,
1983)@ www.room21.com.au
Learners independently apply and extend from We Do tasks
Tips for You Do▪Make sure it aligns to the Can-Do/Learning Goal▪Can be a partner task, just not Collaborative
Cautions for You Do▪Make sure they are not replicating Teacher Model Lesson▪Don’t require 100% accuracy for success
2/22/2018
14
Making it Meaningful & Transparent: Reflection▪ Both Teacher and Students reflect on
progress and connection to Lesson Can-Dos.
▪ Opportunity to deliver individual and whole group feedback on progress toward Program or Lesson Can-Dos
▪ Connect this learning to past learning & next learning
Adapted from The Gradual Release of Responsibility Model: A Learning Framework ( Pearson and Gallagher,
1983)@ www.room21.com.au
TEACHER RESPONSIBILITY
STUDENT RESPONSIBILITY
Focus Lesson
Guided Instruction
“I do it”
“We do it”“You do it together”Collaborative
Independent “You do italone”
Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2008). Better learning through structured teaching: A framework for the gradual release of responsibility. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Gradual Release of Responsibility
2/22/2018
15
Scaffolding + Gradual Release▪I Do: Teacher Delivers Focus Lesson: input; strategy; description; purpose; models▪We Do Guided Practice: students use strategy/language/etc while teacher guides a very scaffolded task (Continue as necessary!) ▪We Do Collaborative Practice: students collaborate in pairs/groups to participate in scaffolded task with teacher facilitation (Continue as necessary!)▪You Do: Independent Practice: students independently use new learning with minimal to no teacher guidance or scaffolding