Moving from Strategy to Project Project Management Software Joseph F. McLaughlin [email protected] www.nonproftech.info
Dec 22, 2015
Agenda
• A. “Six Views of PM (Project Management) Software"– Techsoup.org
(http://tinyurl.com/c3noeec)
• B. Some considerations• C. Software packages/vids
2
Agenda
• A. “Six Views of PM (Project Management) Software"– Techsoup.org
(http://tinyurl.com/c3noeec)
• B. Some considerations• C. Software packages/vids
3
A. 6 views of PM software
1. Planning projects2. Managing tasks3. Sharing/collaborating on
documents4. Sharing calendars/contact lists5. Managing issues/bugs6. Tracking time
4
A. 6 views of PM software1. Planning projects
• What planner must do:– define project schedule– understand critical path– assess/allocate resources
5
A. 6 views of PM software1. Planning projects
• What software must do for tasks:– details– assignments– time estimate: Gantt
charts– links between tasks:
visual maps
6
A. 6 views of PM software1. Planning projects
• Considerations:– high-level planning– probably requires dedicated staff–maybe not good for smaller orgs– TechSoup found no software that did it
all
• Possible software :–MS (Microsoft) Project (generally true for
#1-6)– DreamTeam (SalesForce)
7
A. 6 views of PM software1. Planning projects
• Possible software :–MS (Microsoft) Project (generally true for
#1-6)– DreamTeam (SalesForce)
8
A. 6 views of PM software
1. Planning projects2. Managing tasks3. Sharing/collaborating on
documents4. Sharing calendars/contact lists5. Managing issues/bugs6. Tracking time
9
A. 6 views of PM software2. Managing tasks
• What staff must do for task:– define– assign– create deadline– track to completion
• Most common approach/need
10
A. 6 views of PM software2. Managing tasks
• Considerations:– lower-level than 1. Planning Projects– typically a collaborative process
• Possible software:– Basecamp– Remember The Milk
11
A. 6 views of PM software
1. Planning projects2. Managing tasks3. Sharing/collaborating on
documents4. Sharing calendars/contact lists5. Managing issues/bugs6. Tracking time
12
A. 6 views of PM software3&4. Sharing/collaborating
• What staff must do:– share/collaborate on files, calendars,
contacts, etc.– keep track of revisions and attachments– possibly work from different locations
• collaboration planning
13
A. 6 views of PM software3&4. Sharing/collaborating
• Possible software:–MS: Office 365,
Outlook, Exchange, SharePoint, etc.
– Google: docs, spreadsheets, calendars, Google+, groups, sites, etc.
– DropBox
14
Agenda
• A. “Six Views of PM (Project Management) Software"– Techsoup.org
(http://tinyurl.com/c3noeec)
• B. Some considerations• C. Software packages/vids
15
B. Some considerations
• Email: probably a poor choice for communications in planning– everything else has learning curve
• Spreadsheets: a poor choice for storing/manipulating info– databases- steepest learning curve of all
16
B. Some considerations
• Spreadsheets: often a poor choice for storing/manipulating info– databases- steepest learning curve of all
17
B. Some considerations
• “To cloud” or “not to cloud”:– “cloud-based”= “web/browser-
based”– no installation req– otherwise on your server(s)– security issues:
• web companies’ reputations based on security
• stuff happens• if you have IT staff, maybe use server-
based• home office/ remote login may create
security threat
18
B. Some considerations
• “To cloud” or “not to cloud”:– security issues:
• web companies’ reputations based on security
• stuff happens• if you have IT staff, maybe
use server-based• home office/ remote login
may create security threat
19
B. Some considerations
• $$:– limited free (small), open-source– www.techsoup.org/stock: software for
admin $$ to qualifying NPOs– even most $$ software probably
affordable for most
20
Agenda
• A. “Six Views of PM (Project Management) Software"– Techsoup.org
(http://tinyurl.com/c3noeec)
• B. Some considerations• C. Software packages/vids
21
C. Software packages
• MS Project:–MANY features/ steep learning curve– develop the plans up-front– requires dedicated planner– best if already MS-based (Office,
Outlook, etc.)– probably gold-standard of planning–may be overkill for smaller orgs
22
C. Software packages
• Basecamp:– cloud-based– smaller teams, less complex planning– no calendars or Gantt charts, poor task
management– good file management/sharing– focused on dispersed teams– “Basecamp is built first and foremost for
speed.”
23
C. Software packages
• DreamTeam (SalesForce)– free for NPOs (10 licenses)– one notch down from MS Project
24
C. Software packages
• Google collaboration:
25
C. Software packages
• Google:– Gold standard of (free) online collaboration– Apps free for NPOs: Google services on
steroids– If you don’t see what you need, check back
tomorrow……• Useful for planning:
– Google groups are wiki-like- use instead of email– Google sites are a weak point– Gantt charts for spreadsheets– GroupCamp for Apps
26
C. Software packages
• Google:– Gold standard of (free) online collaboration– Apps free for NPOs: Google services on steroids– If you don’t see what you need, check back
tomorrow……• Useful for planning:
– Google groups are wiki-like- use instead of email– Google sites are a weak point– Gantt charts for spreadsheets– GroupCamp for Apps– Google docs upgraded collaboration tools
27
C. Software package vids
• MS Project 7 min
• Basecamp:– easy participation 2– peoples’ pages 2– calendar 2.5
– drag & drop 1
• DreamTeam 2• Google:
– Gantt chart 4.5
– real-time collaboration 2– GroupCamp 3
28
Other Links
• MS Project: www.microsoft.com/project/en-us/project-management.aspx
• Basecamp: basecamp.com
• DreamTeam: www.dreamfactory.com
• Remember The Milk: http://www.rememberthemilk.com/
• Dropbox: https://www.dropbox.com/home
• Google Apps for NPOs: www.google.com/apps/intl/en/nonprofit/index.html
29