Motivation: Why we do things and why we don’t? Dr. David De Cremer.

Motivation: Why we do things and why we don’t?

Dr. David De Cremer

Definition Performance Importance to Self The process of arousing, directing

and maintaining behavior toward a goal

Arousal: drive/energy behind actions Direction: choice of behavior Maintenance: people’s persistence

Overview Types of motivation: Intrinsic-

extrinsic Importance of human needs Expectancy theory Fairness: Equity/Procedural fairness Goal-setting theory Leadership: Charisma

Intrinsic-extrinsic motivation Why do we engage in activities? Intrinsic = enjoyment of engaging in the

activity itself (an end in itself) Extrinsic = focus on rewards (means to

an end) Self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan,

2000): autonomy, competence and relatedness

To express oneself by means of need fulfillment (= self-determination)

Intrinsic-extrinsic (continued) Psychological needs: specific

innate psychological nutriments that are essential for ongoing psychological growth, integrity and well-being.

Adaptation to environment (performance)

Fulfillment of these needs will enhance intrinsic motivation

Autonomy Freedom of choice, action is self-

determined Most important one (Deci & Ryan) Study on REWARDS (threats with noice,

surveillance, autonomous supported teachers)

Rewards undermine intrinsic motivation However, less so if rewards are non-task

contingent Overjustification effect

Competence The drive of being effective Positive feedback enhances

intrinsic motivation and negative feedback undermines it (if individuals feel responsible for the outcome)

Autonomy and competence work together to explain many results

Relatedness (need to belong) Intrinsic motivation more likely in contexts

of secure relatedness (groups to survive) Experiment (De Cremer, UM, 2001) Performance context: social dilemma Conflict personal and group’s interest

(contribute or not) I.V.: Respect and standing within the group Matter of inclusiveness

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Peripheral Core

RespectNo respect

Intrinsic-extrinsic motivation Cognitive effect: “If you do A then you

can do B” (preference activity) How to enhance intrinsic motivation?

Role model as source of intrinsic motivation (e.g. piano teacher)

Challenge, curiosity, feelings of control Fulfillment of needs

Expectancy Theory The role of expectations concerning success

(e.g. good grades) When do you put a lot of efforts in? Expectancy theory asserts that people are

motivated to exert effort if the belief exists that this will help to achieve desirable outcomes.

People as rational being: Expectancy: outcome is attainable by effort (training

required) Value: the meaning of the reward/outcome (e.g.

money, vacation, cafetaria benefits)

Expectancy theory (continued) Group level: social loafing/free-riding Reason for low/high productivity Individuals expected to put effort in:

If they value the behavior or the outcome (effect GROUP IDENTIFICATION)

If a contingency between behavior and outcome is perceived (effect SELF-EFFICACY)

Two experimental studies (De Cremer, 1999, 2001)

Experimental studies Experiment 1: Effect group identification Consequence: self-interest and group’s

interest are interchangeable (self-categorization processes)

Goal-transformation hypothesis Test: particularly for those with a pro-self

orientation or goal (social value orientations; De Cremer & van Lange, 2001)

Support for the value-assumption

0

50

100

150

200

250

Personal Collective

ProselfProsocial

Experimental studies Experiment 2: effect self-efficacy

and group identification Support for the expectancy-

assumption Value and expectancy are two

independent components and need both to be fulfilled to reveal optimal performance

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

Personal Collective

Low SEHigh SE

Fairness: Equity Review: fairness concerns are pervasive Equity concerns: people compare

themselves to others by focusing on outcomes (pay, prestige) and inputs (time worked, effort)

I other/O own vs. I other/ O other

3 different states: overpayment, underpayment equitable payment

Emotional consequences: injustice=negative emotional stateSpecific behaviors

Fairness (continued) How to restore inequity (actions)? People turn inequitable outcomes into

equitable (stealing, less effort etc.) E.g.: basketball, temporary pay cut Cognitive: altering thinking about own and

other’s outcomes Procedural fairness: procedures used to

determine outcomes Promotes OCB, commitment and performance Self-interest and Relational interest (Lind)

Goal-setting theory Focus on why individuals with similar

qualities may perform differently? Depends on PERFORMANCE GOALS 1. Assign specific goals (self-efficacy) 2. Use difficult, but attainable goals 3. Provide feedback Goal-setting facilitates self-regulation

(provides a path toward the desired outcome)

Leadership: charisma Is about exerting influence! Top 10 sayings of ineffective leaders 10. We don’t do it that way around here 9. I don’t care what they told you in that training class, this is the real world

(self-efficacy) 8. Drop what you are doing and get this to me as soon as possible 7. Don’t worry about WHY, just do it! 6. Don’t let me influence your decisions, but here’s my opinion 5. I want you to take risks, but remember our motto: DO it right the first time 4. You’re planning to work this weekend aren’t you? 3. You oughta, wanta do this. 2. We need teamwork. By the way, I’ll be doing your individual rankings this

weekend. 1. If and when I want your opinion, I’ll give it to you.

Autonomy, fairness, competence, self-efficacy are challenged

Leadership (continued) Transformational leadership: motivate

people to go beyond their self-interest Charisma: to appeal to group members’

motives, aspirations and preferences, articulation of a compelling vision. Provide a PATH (goal-setting)!!

“You can only lead others where you yourself are willing to go” (Lachlan Mclean)

Instill commitment and vision among employees

Leadership (continued) Experiment (De Cremer, in press,

UM) Self-sacrifice vs. benefiting Pro-selfs vs. pro-socials Transformation of motives Modeling behavior, path, trust,

fairness www.leaderx.com (leadership skills)

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

Sacrifice Benefit

ProselfProsocial