Top Banner
Moral Panic Theory
36

Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Dec 24, 2015

Download

Documents

Penelope Mosley
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Moral Panic Theory

Page 2: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

The Social Construction of Reality

• Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966

• Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction

• The meanings of anything are the product of human interpretations and are not in nature

• Our understandings of the world are produced by us, are socially constructed

Page 3: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Moral Panics

• Stanley Cohen (1972) Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and the Rockers

• A study of subculture and the media’s role in defining social problems

Page 4: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Cohen’s Case Study

• Conflict between Mods (Modernists) and Rockers, in Clacton on Easter Sunday, 1964

• Two groups fought, resulting in some vandalism and property damage

• In the end, 97 arrested• Followed by events in

Brighton and Margate

Page 5: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Conclusions

• The media's coverage of the episode was subject to exaggeration and distortion of the facts, giving the impression the event was more violent than it actually was.

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ud5vP0RwNy0

Page 6: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

The Who’s Quadrophenia

• Record released October 1973

• Film released 1979• http://www.youtube.co

m/watch?v=DYlSjawXzko

Page 7: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Moral Panics

Moral Panic, defined: “A condition, episode,person or group ofpersons emerges tobecome defined as athreat to societal valuesand interests”

Page 8: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

The Role of Media

• An 'amplification' takes place through the media

• It appeals to the public so that they concur with ready-made opinions about the course of action to be taken

Page 9: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Actors in the Moral Drama

• Experts, sometimes called “moral entrepreneurs,” both inform and are informed by media

• Politicians and policy makers• Law enforcement• Action groups• Agents of formal social

control• http://www.youtube.com/w

atch?v=YM8t29gD8J8

Page 10: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Social Control

Moral panics function to support and legitimize particular kinds of social control through:

1) Identifying a “social problem”;

2) Simplifying its cause;3) Stigmatizing those involved;4) Stirring up public

indignation or concern.

Page 11: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

The Disaster Analogy: Panic Parallels

• Warning• Sensitization to cues of

danger• Coping mechanisms• Overreactions• Institutionalization of

the threat• False alarms

Page 12: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Seven “Stations” of Moral Panic: Chas Critcher

• AIDS• Child Abuse• Drug Use• Immigration• Violence in the media• Street Crime• Youth “deviance”

Page 13: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Goode and Ben Yehuda (1994)Moral Panics:

The Social Construction of Deviance

1. Concern2. Hostility3. Consensus4. Disproportionality5. Volatility

Page 15: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Hostility

• Us versus Them• Good versus Evil• Morality play• Folk devils (villains) and

folk heroes• Hostility to others

expressed in stereotypes

Page 16: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Consensus

Fairly widespread recognition that a social problem existsIt need not include everyone, but enough to convey a general sense of concernConsensus can be built.• http://www.youtube.co

m/watch?v=OiYqFXmVAFg

Page 17: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Disproportion

• Miscalculation or overestimation of the size of the problem, including the number of people involved

• Fabrication of figures• Rumours or urban

legends• http://

www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTdmr5_tbfY

Page 18: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Volatility

• Moral panics appear suddenly and can disappear just as quickly

• CBC report on Dungeons & Dragons, 1980s

• http://archives.cbc.ca/lifestyle/leisure/clips/17284/

Page 19: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Overlapping domains

• Deviance (to which we can add constructions of norms and normalization)

• Social problems• Collective behaviours• Social movements

Page 20: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Three Theories of the Origins of Moral Panics:

• Marxist Theory• Moral Panics serve the

interests of the elite, who benefit from them in some way.

Page 21: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

The Grassroots Theory

• Moral Panics begin in and emerge out of the people.

• Moral panics are populist, they reflect the anxieties and fears of the people.

Page 22: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Interest- Group Theory

• Interest-groups, which reflect the middle level of power and are not to be confused with the elite, have their own agendas, including maximizing their own ideology and morality or seeking material or status advantages

Page 23: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Ideology and Hegemony?

• Goode and Ben Yehuda suggest that moral panics need not be “ideological,” while others suggest that they are always ideological.

• How should we conceive of ideology and hegemony as they are expressed in Moral Panics?

Page 24: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Case Study: Comic Books

• Frederic Wertham, Seduction of the Innocent, 1954

• Call for a Comic Code Authority

• http://www.comicartville.com/comicscode.htm

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xr62iKBwQTM

Page 25: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Erving Goffman (1974) Framing Theory

• The ways that stories are framed influences the meaning they will have

• Definitions of a situation are constructed in accordance with principles of organization which govern events and our subjective involvement in them

Page 26: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Frames Defined

• Frames are cognitive structures which guide perception and representations of reality

• They structure which parts of reality get noticed

• They are not necessarily consciously manufactured and are often unconsciously adopted

Page 27: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Todd Gitlin’s (1980) definition

• “Frames are principles of selection, emphasis and presentation composed of little tacit theories about what exists, what happens, and what matters.”

• In sort, frames structure our attention

Page 28: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Media Effects

• What effects does our consumption of media have on our understandings of the world?

Page 29: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Cultivation Theory – George Gerbner

• TV viewing has quantitatively observable effects on the perceptual worlds of audiences

• Watching violence on TV creates an exaggerated belief that the world is violent or, in his words, “mean and scary”

Page 30: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

The Hypodermic Model

• Also known as the “Magic Bullet theory”

• The passive audience is injected with ideas about the world by media

Page 31: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Agenda Setting Theory McComb and Shaw

• The agenda of the media and the public agenda are closely matched

• The media’s agenda setting function means that there is a high correlation between media and the public ordering of priorities

• People are more likely to attribute importance to an event, issue, or idea because of media exposure

Page 32: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Moral Panics Vs ....

How Risk is Defined in MPs:• Risk found in people• Risks are time limited and

infinitely substitutable• Risks lead to scape- goating• Risks are created by media• Moral outrage is the

outcome• Moral panics can create a

culture of fear

Page 33: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

...Vs Risk SocietyRisk Defined in Risk Society:• Risk found in our

environments• Risks are not bound to space

and time • Risks are defined not for

purposes of blame but for purposes of increased control

• Risks are created by science and knowledge

• Moral imperatives to risk aversion are the outcome

• Risk knowledges can create a culture of fear

Page 34: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

• What gets defined as a panic and what not depends on who is doing the defining.

• Political agendas and selectivity

• Pedagogies of fear

Page 35: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Technical explanations:

• Media amplification or attenuation of risk

• Most people get information by way of media

• Fear sells

Page 36: Moral Panic Theory. The Social Construction of Reality Peter Berger and Thomas Luckman, 1966 Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction.

Social explanations:

• Change is experienced as risk

• Concern about the future• Impossibility of knowing• Diminished humanity• Reconciling limits • All collect under the

umbrella of the last theme: Diminished sense of control