MOPAC CHALLENGE QUARTERLY PEFORMANCE OF THE MPS APRIL 2013
Jan 16, 2016
MOPAC CHALLENGE
QUARTERLY PEFORMANCE OF THE MPSAPRIL 2013
2
After the successful launch of the Police and Crime Plan in March 2013, future quarterly performance MOPAC Challenges will review London crime figures against the targets set out in the Plan:
•Reduce key neighbourhood crimes by 20%, which means up to 250,000 fewer crimes.•Boost public confidence in the police by 20%, up to 75%.
POLICE AND CRIME PLAN
NEIGHBOURHOOD CRIME
NEIGHBOURHOOD CRIME REDUCTION TARGET
MOPAC’s challenge to the Metropolitan Police Service over the next four years is to cut seven key neighbourhood crimes by 20%
Category FY2012/13
Volume % change vs.
FY2011/12
Total MOPAC 7 384,474 -6%
Violence with Injury 57,836 -6%Robbery 34,764 -11%Burglary 92,644 -4%Vandalism (Criminal Damage)
59,910 -18%
Theft From the Person 49,265 +17%Theft of Motor Vehicle 22,139 -15%Theft From Motor Vehicle
67,916 -7%
3
MPS QUARTERLY CRIME FIGURESNEIGHBOURHOOD CRIME
3-month trend 12-month trend
Crime Category
Jan 12 – Mar 12
Jan 13 – Mar 13
TrendVolume Change
% change
Apr 11 – Mar 12
Apr 12 – Mar 13
TrendVolume Change
% change
Violence with Injury
14,077 13,027 -1,050 -7.5% 61,346 57,836 -3,510 -5.7%
Robbery 9,336 7,824 -1,512 -16.2% 38,914 34,764 -4,150 -10.7%
Burglary 25,068 23,882 -1,186 -4.7% 96,224 92,644 -3,580 -3.7%
Vandalism (Criminal Damage)
16,667 13,726 -2,941 -17.6% 72,928 59,910 -13,018 -17.9%
Theft From the Person
11,211 12,372 +1,161 +10.4% 42,081 49,265 +7,184 +17.1%
Theft of Motor Vehicle
5,669 5,103 -566 -10.0% 26,188 22,139 -4,049 -15.5%
Theft From Motor Vehicle
18,661 17,163 -1,498 -8.0% 73,352 67,916 -5,436 -7.4%
4
BURGLARYQUARTERLY BOROUGH PERFORMANCE JAN 2013–MAR 2013
10 Highest Boroughs (volume of offences)
Rank Borough Total OffencesRank Previous Quarter
(Oct 12 – Dec 12)
1 Barnet 1264 1
2 Croydon 1059 3
3 Ealing 1047 2
4 Lambeth 983 6
5 Lewisham 975 10
6 Brent 955 5
7 Enfield 929 4
8 Westminster 925 8
9 Redbridge 902 7
10 Bromley 882 11
10 Lowest Boroughs (volume of offences)Boroughs 11-22(volume of offences)
23 Greenwich 630 27
24 Hackney 630 21
25 Richmond 610 25
26 Islington 586 26
27 Merton 475 24
28 Bexley 456 31
29 K&C 414 29
30 H&F 357 32
31 Sutton 345 28
32 Kingston 332 30
11 Hounslow 808 12
12 Southwark 799 18
13 Newham 782 13
14 Havering 781 17
15 Wandsworth 779 9
16 Camden 775 20
17 B&D 761 22
18 Hillingdon 759 14
19 Tower Hamlets 745 19
20 Waltham Forest 728 16
21 Harrow 727 23
22 Haringey 680 15 5
The thematic map shows borough comparison for percentage change over the last 3 months (Jan 2013– Mar 2013) as compared with the same 3-month period last
year
BoroughRate per
1000 population
Westminster 4.22 B&D 4.09 Barnet 3.55 Lewisham 3.53 Camden 3.52 Havering 3.29 Richmond 3.26 Lambeth 3.24 Redbridge 3.23 Hounslow 3.18 Ealing 3.09 Brent 3.07 Harrow 3.04 Enfield 2.97 Tower
Hamlets 2.93 Croydon 2.91 Bromley 2.85 Islington 2.84 Waltham
Forest 2.82 Southwark 2.77 Hillingdon 2.77 Haringey 2.67 K&C 2.61 Hackney 2.56 Newham 2.54 Wandsworth 2.54 Greenwich 2.47 Merton 2.38
Kingston 2.07 Bexley 1.97 H&F 1.96 Sutton 1.81 MPS
Average 2.92
BURGLARYQUARTERLY BOROUGH PERFORMANCE JAN 2013–MAR 2013
The thematic map shows borough comparison for percentage change over the last 12 months (Financial Year 2012/13) as compared with the same 12-month period last year. The smaller triangles on the map represent percentage change over the last quarter (Jan 2013 – Mar 2013) as compared to the same period last year.
BURGLARYFINANCIAL YEAR 2012/13 BOROUGH PERFORMANCE
Long term trend: FY12/13, % change vs previous year
Short term trend: Q4 Jan 13 – Mar 13, % change vs same 3-month period previous year
7
BURGLARY NATIONAL COMPARISON
Crime in England and Wales, year ending December 2012
8
MPS % change
E & W % change
MPS rank in E & W (1=best/
largest reduction)
MPS rank in MSF(1=best/ largest
reduction)
-2.7% -8.6% 34th out of 43 4th out of 4
THEFT FROM THE PERSONQUARTERLY BOROUGH PERFORMANCE JAN 2013–MAR 2013
10 Highest Boroughs (volume of offences)
Rank Borough Total OffencesRank Previous Quarter
(Oct 12 – Dec 12)
1 Westminster 2599 1
2 Camden 1049 2
3 Lambeth 1025 3
4 Islington 910 4
5 Hackney 781 5
6 Southwark 763 6
7 Newham 565 7
8 K&C 468 10
9 Tower Hamlets 423 9
10 Wandsworth 351 8
10 Lowest Boroughs (volume of offences)Boroughs 11-22(volume of offences)
23 Greenwich 141 17
24 Kingston 130 23
25 Hillingdon 118 24
26 Merton 103 28
27 Havering 96 26
28 Bromley 93 27
29 Harrow 93 29
30 Richmond 77 31
31 Sutton 48 30
32 Bexley 43 32
11 Waltham Forest 280 16
12 H&F 276 12
13 Ealing 267 14
14 Haringey 266 11
15 Lewisham 217 20
16 Barnet 194 18
17 Brent 191 15
18 Croydon 183 13
19 Redbridge 182 19
20 Enfield 146 21
21 B&D 142 25
22 Hounslow 142 22 9
The thematic map shows borough comparison for percentage change over the last 3 months (Jan 2013– Mar 2013) as compared with the same 3-month period last
year
BoroughRate per
1000 population
Westminster 11.85 Camden 4.76 Islington 4.42 Lambeth 3.38 Hackney 3.17 K&C 2.95 Southwark 2.65 Newham 1.83 Tower
Hamlets 1.66 H&F 1.51 Wandsworth 1.14 Waltham
Forest 1.08 Haringey 1.04 Kingston 0.81 Ealing 0.79 Lewisham 0.79 B&D 0.76 Redbridge 0.65 Brent 0.61 Hounslow 0.56 Greenwich 0.55 Barnet 0.54 Merton 0.52 Croydon 0.50 Enfield 0.47 Hillingdon 0.43 Richmond 0.41 Havering 0.40
Harrow 0.39 Bromley 0.30 Sutton 0.25 Bexley 0.19 MPS
Average 1.51
THEFT FROM THE PERSONQUARTERLY BOROUGH PERFORMANCE JAN 2013–MAR 2013
THEFT FROM THE PERSONFINANCIAL YEAR 2012/13 BOROUGH PERFORMANCE
The thematic map shows borough comparison for percentage change over the last 12 months (Financial Year 2012/13) as compared with the same 12-month period last year. The smaller triangles on the map represent percentage change over the last quarter (Jan 2013 – Mar 2013) as compared to the same period last year.
Long term trend: FY12/13, % change vs previous year
Short term trend: Q4 Jan 13 – Mar 13, % change vs same 3-month period previous year
11
THEFT PERSON NATIONAL COMPARISON
Crime in England and Wales, year ending December 2012
12
MPS % change
E & W % change
MPS rank in E & W (1=best/
largest reduction)
MPS rank in MSF(1=best/ largest
reduction)
+19.7% +8.4% 38th out of 43 4th out of 4
PUBLIC CONFIDENCE
PUBLIC CONFIDENCE DRIVERS
MOPAC’s challenge to the MPS over the next four years is to boost public confidence in the MPS from 62% to 75% of Londoners thinking the MPS are
doing a good or excellent job.
The MPS have carried out robust analysis of their Public Attitude Survey and identified four key drivers of public confidence:
14
PUBLIC CONFIDENCE – TREND
CSEW Sep 2012: 62% of Londoners think the police do a good job in the local area
This places the MPS top of its MSF and 19th in the country on this measure.
MOPAC Challenge
Boost public
confidence to 75% in
CSEW
62 6365 65 66 67 66 66 65 64 64 64
60 60 60 60 5960 61 61 62 62 62
6466 66 67 68 69 68 68 67 66 66 65
63 64 64 65 66
60
56
52
46 47 47 45
1312 12 12 12
11 11 10 9 10 11
13
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
Q4 09-10
Q1 10-11
Q2 10-11
Q3 10-11
Q4 10-11
Q1 11-12
Q2 11-12
Q3 11-12
Q4 11-12
Q1 12-13
Q2 12.13
Q3 12.13
Pe
rce
nta
ge
(%
)
Quarter/year
Overall Public Confidence and a selection of key drivers(Rolling 12 months per point)
PAS Confidence(%Excellent/good)
CSEWConfidence (%Excellent/good)
Q62F Deal withthings that matter(% agree)
Q131 How wellinformed aboutpolice in thisarea (% wellinformed)
ASB compositemeasure (% highdisorder) *noteupward trend onASB is negative
15
PUBLIC CONFIDENCE – NATIONAL COMPARISON
16
CRIME AND CONFIDENCE TARGET
The graph below illustrates current MPS performance on the following targets:•Drive down crime in seven key neighbourhood crime categories by at least 20% over 4 years;•Boost confidence over the next four years from 62% to 75% of Londoners thinking the MPS are doing a good or excellent job.
17
VICTIM SATISFACTION – NATIONAL COMPARISON
The MPS performance in this area is poor (lowest across all 43 forces for victim satisfaction).
18
VICTIM SATISFACTION – TREND
User Satisfaction Survey Quarter 3 12/13:
Overall satisfaction has increased by 2% since the same time last year, as has 'ease of contact‘.
Overall Satisfaction & Service AreasRolling 12 months per point
92% 93% 93% 93% 93%
93% 93%92%
91% 91% 91%93% 93%
74% 74% 74%75%
74%73%
71%70% 69% 69%
71% 71%73%
67% 67% 67% 67%66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 65% 65% 66% 67%
87% 87% 87% 88% 87% 87% 87% 87% 87% 86% 87% 87% 88%
76%77% 77% 77% 77% 76% 75%
74% 74% 74% 75%76% 76%
50%
55%
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
Q4
09
/10
Q1
10
/11
Q2
10
/11
Q3
10
/11
Q4
10
/11
Q1
11
/12
Q2
11
/12
Q3
11
/12
Q4
11
/12
Q1
12
/13
Q2
12
/13
Q3
12
/13
Q4
12
/13
% C
VF
Sa
tisfi
ed
Ease of Contact Police Actions Follow Up Police Treatment Overall Satisfaction
19
OTHER CRIME
MPS QUARTERLY CRIME FIGURESOTHER KEY CRIME TYPES
3-month trend 12-month trend
Crime Category
Jan 12 – Mar 12
Jan 13 – Mar 13
TrendVolume Change
% change
Apr 11 – Mar 12
Apr 12 – Mar 13
TrendVolume Change
% change
Serious Youth Violence
1602 1214 -388 -24.2% 6899 4968 -1931 -28.0%
Rape Offences
818 786 -32 -3.9% 3342 3042 -300 -9.0%
Serious Sexual Offences
1858 1962 104 +5.6% 7983 7894 -89 -1.1%
Domestic Violence
11432 11268 -164 -1.4% 46401 48897 2496 +5.4%
Business Crime
14619 12520 -2099 -14.4% 61510 51326 -10184 -16.6%
Drugs Offences*
17746 17408 -338 -1.9% 73138 70370 -2768 -3.8%
*NB: Recorded crime figures for drugs offences will reflect police activity in an area
21
217
320340
376 372 381
432466
550570 561 573
592
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Mar-
12
Apr-
12
May-1
2
Jun-1
2
Jul-12
Aug-1
2
Sep-1
2
Oct-
12
Nov-1
2
Dec-1
2
Jan-1
3
Feb-1
3
Mar-
13
Nu
mb
ers
in
Cu
sto
dy
In custody (not top 2000)
In custody (top 2000)
Trend
Target
GANG-RELATED CRIME
22
Gang members in custody have increased from 217 to 803, an additional 586
nominals.
% change
Offence Offences SDs Offences SDs offences
Trident Murders 13 7 5 8 200.0% -61.5%
Violence with Injury 61346 1539 57836 1642 34.3% -5.7%
Knife Crime Offences 14169 3234 11376 2698 23.7% -19.7%
Knife used to injure 3968 1219 3218 973 30.2% -18.9%
Gun Crime 2404 595 1913 548 28.6% -20.4%
Gun Discharge Crime 496 94 397 89 22.4% -20.0%
Serious Youth Violence Victims
6899 - 4968 - -28.0%
Knife injury victims under 25, non-DV
1905 - 1380 - -28.0%
SD Rate
-
-
FY 11/12 FY 12/13(01 April - 31 Mar) (01 April - 31 Mar)
The thematic map shows borough comparison for percentage change over the last 12 months (Financial Year 2012/13) as compared with the same 12-month period last year. The smaller triangles on the map represent percentage change over the last quarter (Jan 2013 – Mar 2013) as compared to the same period last year.
SERIOUS YOUTH VIOLENCEFINANCIAL YEAR 2012/13 BOROUGH PERFORMANCE
Long term trend: FY12/13, % change vs previous year
Short term trend: Q4 Jan 13 – Mar 13, % change vs same 3-month period previous year
23
2012/13 target: increase the number of rape sanction detections by 6%
RECORDED RAPE OFFENCES
24
38
87
143
192
261
327
406
492537
575
643
588
458
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Apr 12 May 12 Jun 12 Jul 12 Aug 12 Sep 12 Oct 12 Nov 12 Dec 12 Jan 13 Feb 13 Mar 13
Target SD's MPS SD's achieved
Headlines
• Effective governance & partnership• Strategy to be published by end of 2013• Support & development of business crime reduction partnerships (West End pilot)• SPOC's at SLT level on all 32 boroughs for business crime• Better use of private sector resources (MSC – employer supported, Project Griffin, Oxford Street pilot with local BID)• Technology (Information & Intelligence Sharing) – various partners trialling apps and software at pilot sites• Strong relationship with British Retail Crime Consortium – MPS highlighted as best practice in national crime survey 2012• Crime reduction hub bringing together licensing, business partnership and crime prevention design advisors has been approved
Business Crime Hotspots
• Identified Top 10 Hotspots• Shared data and analysis with business community• 6 of Top 10 have seen reductions in crime (last six months of 2012)• Business crime down 1% in the last six months of 2012 (and 5% on 2011 levels)• One major retailer has seen a 20% reduction in shoplifting offences following effective crime prevention design and partnership activity• Ethos of "Every Opportunity, Every Tactic"
BUSINESS CRIME
25