Journal of Leukocyte Biology Volume 61, May 1997 583 Monocytes from mobilized stem cells inhibit T cell function Kazuhiko Ino, Rakesh K. Singh, and James E. Talmadge Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha Abstract: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, mobilized peripheral blood stem cell (PSC) products, and peripheral blood leukocytes post- transplantation contain cells that cause allogeneic and autologous T cell apoptosis. Isolation and char- acterization ofthese cells demonstrated that they were low-density (Percoll fractionation) CD14’ monocytes. T cells in PSC products have a depressed phytohe- magglutinin (PHA) mitogenic response; however, pu- rifled CD4 or CD8 T cells exhibit a statistically normal mitogenic function. Furthermore, no T cell inhibitory activity was observed in CD14’, CD4, and CD8 cell-depleted fractions enriched in CD4CD8 TCRa/ T cells. Inhibition of T cell function by CD14 monocytes required cell-cell contact, and the analyses of DNA fragmentation by Southern and TUNEL analysis demonstrates an activation-induced T cell apoptosis in the presence ofCDl4’ monocytes. Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction studies suggested that high levels of interleukin-lO or tumor necrosis factor gene transcripts in the PSC prod- ucts may contribute to the inhibition of T cell func- lion. J. Leukoc. Riot. 61: 583-591; 1997. Key Words: traruplantation . peripheral blood stem cell trans- plantation . apoptosis INTRODUCTION Myeloablative, high-dose therapy (HDT) followed by autol- ogous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PSCT) is used for the treatment of advanced malignancies [1, 2]. Myeloid recovery is more rapid following PSCT compared with autologous bone marrow transplantation (AuBMT) when the peripheral blood stem cells (PSC) are collected after mobilization with hematopoietic growth factors, che- motherapy, or both [3]. In addition, PSCT results in an earlier reconstitution of the immune system compared with AuBMT, perhaps due to the large number of lymphocytes in the PSC product [4-7]. Although immune function re- turns to pretransplant levels, it remains signfficantly de- pressed compared with normal individuals [7]. Further- more, one retrospective study demonstrated that the failure-free survival (FF5) of lymphoma patients after PSCT using steady state PSC products was superior to that observed after AuBMT [2]. However, a high relapse rate is still observed after PSCT and only a minority of patients achieve long-term disease-free survival [1, 2]. Disease re- lapse following PSCT may be attributable not only to sub- optimal ablative chemotherapy or reinfusion of tumor cells but also to inadequate immunological restoration. Thus, strategies to enhance immune function and overcome im- mune tolerance after PSCT are needed to reduce relapse and prolong remission [8, 9]. Recently we found that granulocyte-macrophage co’ony- stimulating factor (GM-CSF) mobilized PSC products as well as peripheral blood (PB) leukocytes post-transplantation contain cells that can inhibit T cell functions [7, 10, 11]. Because immune function is a balance of positive and nega- tive regulators, this observation has potential clinical impor- tance. These cells, which can inhibit T cell function, are associated with hematopoiesis [12-22] and can be in- creased by tumor secretion or administration of hematopoi- etic growth factors [14, 15]. However, the cellular lineage and mechanism of this T cell inhibitory activity remains controversial [12-22]. These studies demonstrate that CD14 cells in PSC products can inhibit T cell function and lead to activation-induced T cell apoptosis. Further- more, when CD14 cells are depleted, isolated CD4 and CD8 T cells from PSC products demonstrate a normal proliferative response to phytohemagglutinin (PHA) com- pared with undepleted stem cell products. This provides one explanation for the immune dysfunction found post- transplantation and suggests that the manipulation of stem cell products could improve immune reconstitution after transplantation with mobilized PSC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients Between April and October, 1995, 21 patients with advanced malig- nancies who were candidates for HDT and autologous PSCT were Abbreviations: PSC, peripheral blood stem cells; PHA, phytohemag- glutinin; HDi high-dose therapy; PSCT, peripheral blood stem cell transplantation; AuBMT, autologous bone marrow transplantation; FF5, failure-free survival; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony- stimulating factor; PB, peripheral blood; WBC, white blood cell; FR, fraction; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; BSA, bovine serum albumin; Flit, fluorescein isothiocyanate; TdT, terminal deoxynucleotidyl trans- ferase; PE, phycoerythrin; APC, allophycocyanin; PFA, paraformalde- hyde; TCR, T cell receptor; IL-2, interleukin-2; IFN-y, interferon-y; TNF-a, tumor necrosis factor a; GBHD, graft versus host disease; NS, natural suppressor. Correspondence: James E. Talmadge, Ph.D., Department of Pathol- ogy and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 600 South 42nd Street, Omaha, NE 68198-5660. Received September 11, 1996; revised January 27, 1997; accepted January 31, 1997.
9
Embed
Monocytes from mobilized stem cells inhibit T cell function
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Journal of Leukocyte Biology Volume 61, May 1997 583
Monocytes from mobilized stem cells inhibit T cell functionKazuhiko Ino, Rakesh K. Singh, and James E. Talmadge
Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
apercent CD14+ cells found by fluorescence cytometry.
bAverage value ± SE.
Clnhibitory cell activity (I:R = 4:1).
d Ratio of each cytokine signal to the signal from the housekeeping gene 3 actin. Units were analyzed b�
digital autoradiographs of the Southern blots in the linear range using image quart software.
�PBL from normal donors.
‘Twenty-four-hour PHA-stimulated normal PBL.
�Significantly different from normal PBL.
such cellular inhibitory activities are disadvantageous in
autologous PSCT recipients based on their ability to de-
crease T cell functions. We suggest, therefore, that the re-
moval of CD14� cells from autologous PSC products
before infusion may be a reasonable therapeutic strategy
to facilitate immune recovery and reduce treatment failure
following autologous PSCT. Indeed, the inability of mobi-
lized PSCT [38] to replicate the retrospective observation
of superior failure-free survival of steady state PSCT com-
pared with BMT reported by Vose et al. [2] may be due
to the difference in the frequency of CD14� cells.
ACKNOWLEDGM ENTS
This research was supported in part by National Institutes
of Health Grant RO1-CA61593 and Nebraska Cancer and
Smoking Disease Research Program Grant 97-71.
We thank the individuals involved in the harvesting and
processing of the stem cell products. Our thanks also to
Drs. Howard Gendelman, Michael Hoffingsworth, John
Sharp, and Rita Young for their review of the manuscript
and helpful suggestions.
REFERENCES
1. Kessinger, A., Bierman, P. J., Vose, J. M.. Armitage, J. 0. (1991) High-dosecyclophosphamide, carmustine, and etoposide followed by autologous pe-
ripheral stem cell transplantation for patients with relapsed Hodgkin’s dis-
ease. Blood 77, 2322-2325.2. Vose, J. M.. Anderson, J. R., Kessinger, A., Bierman, P. J., Coccia, P. Reed,
E. C., Gordon, B., Armitage. J. 0. (1993) High-dose chemotherapy andautologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 11, 1846-1851.
3. To, L. B.. Roberts, M., Haylock, D. (1992) Comparison of haematologicalrecovery times and supportive care requirements of autologous recoveryphase peripheral blood stem cell transplants, autologous bone marrow trans-
plants and allogeneic bone marrow transplants. Bone Marrow Traruplant.
9, 277-284.
4. Henon, P. R.. Liang, H., Beck-Wirth. C., Eisenmann, J., Lepers, M.,
Wunder, E., Kandel, C. (1992) Comparison of hematopoietic and immunerecovery after autologous bone marrow or blood stem cell transplants. Bone
Marrow Tmnsplanz. 9, 285-291.5. Roberts, M. M., To, L. B, Gillis, D.. Mundy. J.. Rawling, C.. Ng, K.. Juttner.
C. (1993) Immune reconstitution following peripheral blood stem cell trans-plantation, autologous bone marrow transplantation and allogeneic bone
marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 12. 469-475.6. Kiesel, S., Pezzutto, A., Korbling, M., Haas, R., Schulz, R., Hunstein, W..
Dorken, B. (1989) Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation:
Analysis of autografted cells and lymphocyte recovery. Tmnsplant. Proc.
21, 3084-3088.7. Talmadge. J. E.. Reed, E., mo, K.. Kessinger, A.. Kuszynski. C.. Heimann.
D.. Varney, M., Jackson. J., Vose. J. M., Bierman. P. J. (1996) Rapid im-
munologic reconstitution following transplantation with mobilized peniph-
eral blood stem cells as compared to bone marrow. Bone Marrow Tmns-plant. in press.
8. Klingemann, H. C. (1995) Introducing graft-versus-leukemia into autolo-gous stem cell transplantation. .L Henzatother. 4, 261-267.
9. Verma. U. N.. Areman, E., Dickerson, S. A., Kotula. P. L., Sacher, R.,
Mazumder, A. (1995) Intenleukin-2 activation of chemotherapy and growthfactor-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells for generation ofcytotoxic effec-
tors. Bone Marrow Tran.splaru. 15. 199-206.10. Talmadge. J. E., Reed, E. C., Kessinger. A., Kuszynski, C. A., Perry.
C. A.. Gordy, C. L., Mills, K. C., Thomas, M. L., Pirruccello, S. J., Letheby.B. A.. Arneson, M. A., Jackson, J. D. (1996) Immunologic attributes of cyto-kine mobilized peripheral blood stem cells and recovery following transplan-
tation. Bone Marrow Tran.splani. 17, 101-109.1 1 . Mills. K. C., Gross, 1’. C., Varney, M. L.. Heimann. D. C.. Reed, E. C..
Kessinger, A., Talmadge, J. E. (1996) Immunologic phenotype and functionin human bone marrow, blood stem cells and umbilical cord blood. Bone
Strober, S. (1992) Studies of CD4CD8a�3� bone marrow T cells withsuppressor activity. J. ImmunoL 148, 373-380.
17. Maier, T., Holda, J. H., Claman, H. N. (1986) Natural suppressor (NS)cells: Members ofthe LGL regulatory family. immunol. Today 7. 312-315.
18. Oseroff, A., Okada, S., Strober, S. (1984) Natural suppressor (NS) cellsfound in the spleen of neonatal mice and adult mice given total lymphoidirradiation (TLI) express the null surface phenotype. J. ImmunoL 132,101-110.
mw ci a!. CD14� cells in mobilized PSC products 591
19. Mortani, F., Singhal, S. K. (1988) Production of human bone marrow-
derived suppressor factor. Effect on antibody synthesis and lectin-activatedcell proliferation. J. Immunol. 141. 3037-3042.
20. Maier, T., Holda, J. H., Claman. H. N. (1985) Graft-vs-host reactions(GVHR) across minor munine histocompatibility barriers. II. Developmentof natural suppressor cell activity. J. Immunol. 135, 1644-1651.
21. Maier, T., Holda, J. H., Claman, H. N. (1989) Munine natural suppressorcells in the newborn, in bone marrow, and after cyclophosphamide: Geneticvariations and dependence on IFN�gammat. J Immunol. 143. 491 -498.
22. Sykes. M.. Eisenthal, A., Sachs, D. H. (1988) Mechanism of protectionfrom graft-vs-host disease in munine mixed allogeneic chimeras. I. Devel-
opment of a null cell population suppressive of cell-mediated lympholysisresponses and derived from the syngeneic bone marrow component. J.Immunol. 140. 2903-2911.
23. Mollereau, B.. Deckert, M., Deas, 0.. Rieux-Laucat. F., Hirsch, F..Bernard. A.. Fischer. A., Lynch, H., Charpentier, R. LeDeist. F.. Senik.A. (1996) CD2-induced apoptosis in activated human peripheral T cells.
J. Immunol. 156. 3184-3190.24. Szabolcs, P.. Avigan. D., Gezelter. S.. Ciocon. D. H.. Moore, M. A. S.. Stein-
man, R. M., Young, J. W. (1996) Dendnitic cells and macrophages can ma-tune independently from a human bone marrow-derived. post-colony-forming unit intermediate. Blood 87, 4520-4530.
25. Wanebo. H. J.. Riley. T.. Katz. D.. Pace. R. C.. Johns. M. E.. Cantrell, R. W.(1988) Indomethacin sensitive suppressor-cell activity in head and neckcancer patients. The role of the adherent mononuclear cell. Cancer 61,462-474.
26. Farmnas, M. C., Rodniguez-Valverde� V.. Zarrabeitia, M. T., Parra-Blanco,
J. A., Sanz-Ortiz, J. (1991) Contribution of monocytes to the decreasedlymphoproliferative response to phytohemagglutinin in patients with lung
cancer. Cancer 68, 1279-1284.27. Hertel-Wulif. B.. Strober, S. (1988) Immunosuppressive lymphokine de-
nived from natural suppressor cells. J. Immunol. 140, 2633-2638.28. Vlasselaer, P. V., Niki, T., Strober, S. (1991) Identification of a factor(s) from
cloned murine natural suppressor cells that inhibits IL-2 secretion duringantigen-driven T cell activation. Cell. ImmunoL 138. 326-340.
29. Mills, C. D. (1991) Molecular basis of “suppressor” macrophages. Argininemetabolism via the nitric oxide synthetase pathway. J. ImmunoL 146.
2719-2723.
30. Schleifer, K. W., Mansfield, J. M. (1993) Suppressor macrophages in Afri-can trypanosomiasis inhibit T cell proliferative responses by nitric oxideand prostaglandins. J. ImmwsoL 151, 5492-5503.
31 . Tomioka, H.. Sato, K., Maw, W. W.. Saito, H. (1995) The role of tumor ne-crosis factor, interferon-y, transforming growth factor-a. and nitric oxide in
the expression of immunosuppressive functions of splenic macrophages in-duced by Mycobacterium avium complex infection. J. Leukoc. BiOL 58.704-712.
32. Munn, D. H.. Pressey, J., Beall. A. C.. Hudes. R.. Alderson, M. R. (1996)Selective activation-induced apoptosis of peripheral T cells imposed by
macrophages. 1 Immunol. 156, 523-532.33. Wu, M. X.. Daley, J. F., Rasmussen, R. A., Schlossman, S. F. (1995) Mono-
cytes are required to prime peripheral blood I cells to undergo apoptosis.
Proc. Nazi. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 1525-1529.34. Wu. M. X., Ao� Z., Hegen. M.. Monimoto, C., Schlosaman. S. F. (1996) Re-
quirement of Fas(CD9S), CD4S, and CD11a/CD18 in monocyte-dependentapoptosis of human T Cells�. J. Immunol. 157, 707-713.
35. Palathumpat, V., Dejbakhsh-Jones. S., HoIm. B.. Strober, S. (1992) Differ-ent subsets of T cells in the adult mouse bone marrow and spleen induceor suppress acute graft-versus-host disease. I ImmunoL 149, 808-817.
36. Korbling, M.. Przepiorka, D., Huh, Y. 0., Engel. H., Van Besien. K., Giralt,S.. Anderson. B.. Kleine, H. D.. Seong, D., Deisseroth, A. R (1995) ADo-
geneic blood stem cell transplantation for refractory leukemia and lym-phoma: Potential advantage of blood over marrow allografts. Blood 85,1659-1665.
37. Azevedo, W. M. (1995) Allogeneic transplantation with blood stem cells
mobilized by rhG-CSF for hematological malignancies. Bone Marrow Traas-plans. 16. 647-653.
38. Liberti. C., Pearce, R., Taghipour. C.. Majolino, I., Goldsione, A. H. (1994)
Comparison of peripheral blood stem-cell and autologous bone marrowtransplantation for lymphoma patients: A case-controlled analysis of the